Abstract
A novel New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase, NDM-13, was identified in a carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli clinical isolate obtained from the urine of a patient in Nepal. The enzymatic activity of NDM-13 against β-lactams was similar to that of NDM-1. However, NDM-13 displayed significantly higher kcat/Km ratios for cefotaxime. The genetic environment of blaNDM-13 was determined to be tnpA-IS30-blaNDM-13-bleMBL-trpF-dsbC-cutA-groES-groL, with blaNDM-13 located within the chromosome.
TEXT
The emergence of metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) and increased carbapenem resistance among Gram-negative pathogens has become a serious problem worldwide (1). MBLs, which are produced by many Gram-negative bacterial species (1) and by Gram-positive Bacillus spp. (2, 3), confer resistance or reduce bacterial susceptibility to carbapenems, cephalosporins, and penicillins, except for monobactams (1). NDM-1 was initially isolated in Sweden from Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli in 2008 (4). Subsequently, 16 NDM variants (www.lahey.org/studies) have been reported in several countries (5–17).
E. coli IOMTU558 was isolated from a urine sample obtained from an inpatient at a university hospital in Nepal in 2013. The bacterial species was identified by biochemical analysis and confirmed by 16S rRNA sequencing (18). MICs were determined using the microdilution method (19). The MBL genes (blaDIM, blaGIM, blaIMP, blaNDM, blaSIM, blaSPM, and blaVIM) were amplified by PCR (20, 21), and the sequence of the entire genome was determined by MiSeq (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Sequences of all drug resistance genes registered at the Lahey Clinic website (www.lahey.org/studies), including MBL genes, were determined using CLC genomics workbench version 5.5. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was performed according to protocols appropriate for E. coli sequences in the MLST database (http://mlst.warwick.ac.uk/mlst/dbs/Ecoli). E. coli transformants expressing blaNDM genes were constructed as described previously (22), with blaNDM-1, which originated from Pseudomonas aeruginosa IOMTU9 (17), used as the reference gene. Recombinant NDMs were purified as described previously (22), with β-lactamase activities during the purification process monitored using nitrocefin (Oxoid, Ltd., Basingstoke, United Kingdom). Initial rates of β-lactamase activities were determined as described previously (22), with some modifications. In the modified protocol, the substrate solutions were prewarmed to 37°C in a water bath to minimize fluctuations in the temperature of the reaction mixture. Km values, kcat values, and kcat/Km ratios were determined by analyzing β-lactam hydrolysis using Lineweaver-Burk plots. Previously reported wavelengths and extinction coefficients were used for analysis of β-lactam substrates (23–25). Km and kcat values were determined using triplicate analyses. A DNA plug, digested for 3 h with I-CeuI, was separated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and subjected to Southern hybridization as described previously (26). Probes for 16S rRNA and blaNDM were prepared as described previously (27, 28).
The MICs of β-lactams for E. coli IOMTU558 are listed in Table 1. The MICs of the other antibiotics were as follows: amikacin, 16 μg/ml; arbekacin, 32 μg/ml; ciprofloxacin, >1,024 μg/ml; colistin, 1 μg/ml; fosfomycin, 8 μg/ml; gentamicin, 256 μg/ml; kanamycin, 256 μg/ml; levofloxacin, 32 μg/ml; minocycline, 4 μg/ml; tigecycline, 2 μg/ml; and tobramycin, 128 μg/ml. PCR showed that the isolate was positive for blaNDM and negative for the other genes. Sequencing of the PCR product showed that it was a novel blaNDM variant. This new variant was designated blaNDM-13, and the sequence was deposited in GenBank. IOMTU558 belonged to sequence type 101 (ST101). Based on the predicted amino acid sequence, NDM-13 had two amino acid substitutions (D95N and M154L) compared to NDM-1 and one amino acid substitution each compared to NDM-3 (M154L) and NDM-4 (D95N). The isolate harbored blaCTX-M-15, blaTEM-166, and ampC. The promoter region of ampC (nucleotides [nt] −42 to −1) included a mutation at nt −18 (G to A), but there were no other mutations or nucleotide insertions compared with E. coli strain K-12. The isolate harbored ompC and ompF and their positive regulator, ompR. The ompR gene had no mutation compared with that of the K-12 strain. IOMTU588 harbored efflux pump genes (the acrAB-tolC operon), the marR repressor gene, and the gene (yedS) encoding the putative outer membrane protein. The marR gene had a mutation resulting in an amino acid substitution (Y137H).
TABLE 1.
MICs of various β-lactams for E. coli strain IOMTU558 and E. coli DH5α transformed with plasmids encoding NDM-1 or NDM-13
| Antibiotic(s) | MIC (μg/ml) for: |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IOMTU558 | DH5α(pHSG398/NDM-1) | DH5α(pHSG398/NDM-13) | DH5α(pHSG398) | |
| Ampicillin | >1,024 | 256 | 512 | 4 |
| Ampicillin-sulbactam | >1,024 | 256 | 256 | 4 |
| Aztreonam | >1,024 | ≤0.063 | ≤0.063 | ≤0.063 |
| Cefepime | >1,024 | 1 | 1 | ≤0.063 |
| Cefoselis | >1,024 | 16 | 16 | ≤0.063 |
| Cefotaxime | >1,024 | 16 | 64 | ≤0.063 |
| Cefoxitin | >1,024 | 64 | 64 | ≤0.063 |
| Cefpirome | >1,024 | 4 | 4 | ≤0.063 |
| Ceftazidime | >1,024 | 256 | 512 | ≤0.063 |
| Ceftriaxone | >1,024 | 16 | 32 | ≤0.063 |
| Cephradine | >1,024 | 512 | 256 | 16 |
| Doripenem | 128 | 0.25 | 0.25 | ≤0.063 |
| Imipenem | 32 | 1 | 2 | 0.125 |
| Meropenem | 128 | 0.25 | 0.25 | ≤0.063 |
| Moxalactam | >1,024 | 32 | 32 | 0.25 |
| Penicillin G | >1,024 | 256 | 256 | 32 |
E. coli DH5α expressing blaNDM-1 or blaNDM-13 showed a significant reduction in susceptibility to all tested β-lactams, except for aztreonam, compared with the DH5α strain expressing a vector control (Table 1). E. coli DH5α expressing blaNDM-13 showed a 4-fold-higher MIC of cefotaxime than E. coli DH5α expressing blaNDM-1 (Table 1).
The recombinant NDM-1 and NDM-13 hydrolyzed all tested β-lactams, except for aztreonam (Table 2). The enzymatic activity profiles of NDM-13 against the tested β-lactams were similar to those of NDM-1; however, NDM-13 showed a higher kcat/Km ratio for cefotaxime, which may have been due to NDM-13 having a lower Km value than NDM-1 (Table 2). The kinetic parameters for NDM-1 (Table 2) differed from those of our previous report (22). The modified protocol utilized in this study may have affected the results of the kinetic assays.
TABLE 2.
Kinetic parameters of NDM-1 and NDM-13 enzymes
| β-Lactam | Result fora: |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDM-1 |
NDM-13 |
|||||
| Km (μM) | kcat (s−1) | kcat/Km (μM−1 s−1) | Km (μM) | kcat (s−1) | kcat/Km (μM−1 s−1) | |
| Ampicillin | 76 ± 6 | 30 ± 0.6 | 0.40 | 140 ± 26 | 52 ± 3 | 0.38 |
| Aztreonam | NHb | NH | NH | NH | NH | NH |
| Cefepime | 129 ± 8 | 9.9 ± 0.4 | 0.077 | 83 ± 11 | 8.2 ± 0.6 | 0.099 |
| Cefotaxime | 49 ± 6 | 41 ± 2 | 0.85 | 22 ± 2 | 38 ± 1 | 1.7 |
| Cefoxitin | 13 ± 3 | 1.0 ± 0.03 | 0.076 | 12 ± 2 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 0.093 |
| Ceftazidime | 54 ± 4 | 8.5 ± 0.2 | 0.16 | 30 ± 3 | 7.5 ± 0.3 | 0.25 |
| Cephradine | 14 ± 3 | 23 ± 1 | 1.8 | 28 ± 4 | 27 ± 1 | 0.98 |
| Doripenem | 39 ± 2 | 13 ± 0.3 | 0.34 | 49 ± 4 | 15 ± 1 | 0.31 |
| Imipenem | 56 ± 7 | 14 ± 1 | 0.26 | 71 ± 6 | 17 ± 1 | 0.24 |
| Meropenem | 21 ± 4 | 21 ± 1 | 1.1 | 37 ± 6 | 26 ± 1 | 0.73 |
| Penicillin G | 19 ± 6 | 19 ± 1 | 1.1 | 37 ± 5 | 49 ± 2 | 1.3 |
The proteins were initially modified by a His tag, which was removed after purification. The Km and kcat values are means ± standard deviations from 3 independent experiments.
NH, no hydrolysis was detected under conditions with substrate concentrations up to 1 mM and enzyme concentrations up to 700 nM.
The genomic environment of blaNDM-13 was tnpA-IS30-blaNDM-13-bleMBL-trpF-dsbC-cutA-groES-groL, and the sequence was deposited in GenBank. This genomic structure, except for blaNDM-13, was identical to that of pPMK1 expressed by K. pneumoniae PMK1 (isolated in Nepal) (29), an Enterobacter hormaechei CCHB10892 plasmid (from Brazil) (30), pKPX-1 from K. pneumoniae KPX (from Taiwan) (31), and pNDM-MAR isolated from K. pneumoniae (from Morocco) (32, 33). However, the blaNDM-13 gene was located on the chromosome (Fig. 1).
FIG 1.

Localization of the blaNDM-13 gene on the chromosome of E. coli strain IOMTU558, separated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Lanes: A, contour-clamped homogeneous electric field (CHEF) DNA size marker (Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA); B, I-CeuI-digested total DNA of E. coli IOMTU558; C, lambda ladder pulsed-field gradient (PFG) marker (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA); D, hybridization of I-Ceu-I-digested total DNA of IOMTU558 with a 16S rRNA-specific probe; and E, hybridization of I-Ceu-I-digested total DNA of IOMTU558 using a blaNDM-13-specific probe.
The two substitutions in NDM-13 compared to NDM-1 (i.e., D95N and M154L) increased the affinity of the enzyme for cefotaxime and affected the catalytic activity of the enzyme against this drug (Table 2). The D95N amino acid substitution was reported to reduce the kcat values of NDM-3 compared with NDM-1 for all β-lactamases tested (28). An NDM-4 mutant containing M154L was found to have increased hydrolytic activity toward carbapenems and several cephalosporins compared with that of NDM-1 (12). NDM-13 with the D95N and M154L substitutions did not show increased hydrolytic activity against the tested carbapenems, cephalosporins, and penicillins, except for cefotaxime. Among the known NDM variants (NDM-1 to NDM-13), amino acid substitutions were observed at 13 amino acid positions: 28, 32, 36, 69, 74, 88, 95, 130, 152, 154, 200, 222, and 233. Positions 28, 32, and 36 are located in the signal peptide region. Positions 95, 130, and 154 have been reported to affect β-lactam hydrolyzing activity (12, 17, 28), although they are not located at the active site of NDM-1 or in amino acid residues that bind to zinc ions (34, 35). The effects of the remaining 10 substitutions on hydrolyzing activity have not yet been reported. Determination of the hydrolyzing activities of all NDM variants is critical to understanding the mechanisms underlying the molecular evolution of the NDMs.
The profile of β-lactam resistance in IOMTU558 (Table 1) could be explained by the presence of blaNDM-13, as well as blaCTX-M-15, blaTEM-166, and ampC. Among these genes, blaCTX-M-15 confers high resistance against most β-lactams (except carbapenems), including aztreonam, cefepime, cefotaxime, and ceftriaxone (36). ampC could not be overexpressed in the isolate. The β-lactam-susceptible E. coli wild-type strain has been found to express ampC at low levels due to degenerated promoter boxes upstream of ampC (37). Two mutations in the ampC promoter sequence, at positions −42 (C to T) and −18 (G to A), generate two alternative promoter boxes, resulting in high-level expression of ampC (37). IOMTU558 had a mutation at position −18 (G to A) but not at position −42. It is unclear whether the mutation at position −18 alone could affect the ampC expression level in IOMTU558. The other mechanisms of β-lactam resistance are decreased cell permeability due to loss or alteration of the ompC and ompF porins and activation of efflux systems (38). Loss or alteration of porins was not detected in IOMTU558. The marR repressor gene of marAB and the yedS gene encoding a putative outer membrane protein were reported to be involved in carbapenem resistance via downregulation of efflux pump genes (the acrAB-tolC operon). The marR mutation and yedS could contribute to carbapenem resistance in IOMTU558 (39).
NDM-producing E. coli belonging to ST101 seems to be an epidemic strain in several regions of the world, although ST101 E. coli strains are not recognized as a cause of pandemics, as is E. coli clone ST131 producing CTX-M types of β-lactamases (40). NDM-1-producing E. coli isolates belonging to ST101 have been reported in Bulgaria (41), Canada (42), England (43), India (44), Pakistan (43), South Korea (45), and the United States (46).
This is the first report describing an NDM-13-producing E. coli isolate. NDM-type MBLs have evolved under the pressure of antibiotic usage. Therefore, NDM-producing pathogens must be monitored.
Nucleotide sequence accession number.
The sequence of blaNDM-13 has been deposited in GenBank under accession no. LC012596.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Institute of Medicine at Tribhuvan University (reference no. 6-11-E) and the Biosafety Committee at the National Center for Global Health and Medicine (approval no. 26-D-088 and 26-D-089).
The study was supported by grants from the Kanae Foundation for Asia-Oceania Collaborative Research and International Health Cooperation Research (24-S-5 and 26-A-103, respectively) and a grant from the Research Program on Emerging and Re-Emerging Infectious Diseases from Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, AMED.
REFERENCES
- 1.Bush K. 2001. New beta-lactamases in Gram-negative bacteria: diversity and impact on the selection of antimicrobial therapy. Clin Infect Dis 32:1085–1089. doi: 10.1086/319610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Queenan AM, Bush K. 2007. Carbapenemases: the versatile beta-lactamases. Clin Microbiol Rev 20:440–458. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00001-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Schlesinger SR, Kim SG, Lee JS, Kim SK. 2011. Purification development and characterization of the zinc-dependent metallo-beta-lactamase from Bacillus anthracis. Biotechnol Lett 33:1417–1422. doi: 10.1007/s10529-011-0569-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yong D, Toleman MA, Giske CG, Cho HS, Sundman K, Lee K, Walsh TR. 2009. Characterization of a new metallo-beta-lactamase gene, blaNDM-1, and a novel erythromycin esterase gene carried on a unique genetic structure in Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 14 from India. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:5046–5054. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00774-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cornaglia G, Giamarellou H, Rossolini GM. 2011. Metallo-beta-lactamases: a last frontier for beta-lactams? Lancet Infect Dis 11:381–393. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70056-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pillai DR, McGeer A, Low DE. 2011. New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase-1 in Enterobacteriaceae: emerging resistance. CMAJ 183:59–64. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.101487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kaase M, Nordmann P, Wichelhaus TA, Gatermann SG, Bonnin RA, Poirel L. 2011. NDM-2 carbapenemase in Acinetobacter baumannii from Egypt. J Antimicrob Chemother 66:1260–1262. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Espinal P, Fugazza G, Lopez Y, Kasma M, Lerman Y, Malhotra-Kumar S, Goossens H, Carmeli Y, Vila J. 2011. Dissemination of an NDM-2-producing Acinetobacter baumannii clone in an Israeli rehabilitation center. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:5396–5398. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00679-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Poirel L, Bonnin RA, Boulanger A, Schrenzel J, Kaase M, Nordmann P. 2012. Tn125-related acquisition of blaNDM-like genes in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:1087–1089. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05620-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ghazawi A, Sonnevend A, Bonnin RA, Poirel L, Nordmann P, Hashmey R, Rizvi TA, Hamadeh MB, Pal T. 2012. NDM-2 carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter baumannii in the United Arab Emirates. Clin Microbiol Infect 18:E34–E36. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03726.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rogers BA, Sidjabat HE, Silvey A, Anderson TL, Perera S, Li J, Paterson DL. 2013. Treatment options for New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase-harboring Enterobacteriaceae. Microb Drug Resist 19:100–103. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2012.0063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nordmann P, Boulanger AE, Poirel L. 2012. NDM-4 metallo-beta-lactamase with increased carbapenemase activity from Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:2184–2186. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05961-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hornsey M, Phee L, Wareham DW. 2011. A novel variant, NDM-5, of the New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase in a multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli ST648 isolate recovered from a patient in the United Kingdom. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:5952–5954. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05108-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Williamson DA, Sidjabat HE, Freeman JT, Roberts SA, Silvey A, Woodhouse R, Mowat E, Dyet K, Paterson DL, Blackmore T, Burns A, Heffernan H. 2012. Identification and molecular characterisation of New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase-1 (NDM-1)- and NDM-6-producing Enterobacteriaceae from New Zealand hospitals. Int J Antimicrob Agents 39:529–533. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2012.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cuzon G, Bonnin RA, Nordmann P. 2013. First identification of novel NDM carbapenemase, NDM-7, in Escherichia coli in France. PLoS One 8:e61322. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gottig S, Hamprecht AG, Christ S, Kempf VA, Wichelhaus TA. 2013. Detection of NDM-7 in Germany, a new variant of the New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase with increased carbapenemase activity. J Antimicrob Chemother 68:1737–1740. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tada T, Miyoshi-Akiyama T, Dahal RK, Sah MK, Ohara H, Kirikae T, Pokhrel BM. 2013. NDM-8 metallo-beta-lactamase in a multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli strain isolated in Nepal. Antimicrob Agents Chemother doi: 10.1128/AAC.02553-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Suzuki MT, Taylor LT, DeLong EF. 2000. Quantitative analysis of small-subunit rRNA genes in mixed microbial populations via 5′-nuclease assays. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:4605–4614. doi: 10.1128/AEM.66.11.4605-4614.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2015. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 25th informational supplement, M100-S25. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ellington MJ, Kistler J, Livermore DM, Woodford N. 2007. Multiplex PCR for rapid detection of genes encoding acquired metallo-beta-lactamases. J Antimicrob Chemother 59:321–322. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Poirel L, Walsh TR, Cuvillier V, Nordmann P. 2011. Multiplex PCR for detection of acquired carbapenemase genes. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 70:119–123. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tada T, Shrestha B, Miyoshi-Akiyama T, Shimada K, Ohara H, Kirikae T, Pokhrel BM. 2014. NDM-12, a novel New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase variant from a carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli clinical isolate in Nepal. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:6302–6305. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03355-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Boschi L, Mercuri PS, Riccio ML, Amicosante G, Galleni M, Frere JM, Rossolini GM. 2000. The Legionella (Fluoribacter) gormanii metallo-beta-lactamase: a new member of the highly divergent lineage of molecular-subclass B3 beta-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44:1538–1543. doi: 10.1128/AAC.44.6.1538-1543.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Crowder MW, Walsh TR, Banovic L, Pettit M, Spencer J. 1998. Overexpression, purification, and characterization of the cloned metallo-beta-lactamase L1 from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 42:921–926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Queenan AM, Shang W, Flamm R, Bush K. 2010. Hydrolysis and inhibition profiles of beta-lactamases from molecular classes A to D with doripenem, imipenem, and meropenem. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:565–569. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01004-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Liu SL, Hessel A, Sanderson KE. 1993. Genomic mapping with I-Ceu I, an intron-encoded endonuclease specific for genes for ribosomal RNA, in Salmonella spp.,Escherichia coli, and other bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90:6874–6878. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.14.6874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wachino J, Yoshida H, Yamane K, Suzuki S, Matsui M, Yamagishi T, Tsutsui A, Konda T, Shibayama K, Arakawa Y. 2011. SMB-1, a novel subclass B3 metallo-beta-lactamase, associated with ISCR1 and a class 1 integron, from a carbapenem-resistant Serratia marcescens clinical isolate. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:5143–5149. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05045-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tada T, Miyoshi-Akiyama T, Shimada K, Kirikae T. 2014. Biochemical analysis of the metallo-beta-lactamase NDM-3 from a multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli strain isolated in Japan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 58:3538–3540. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02793-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Stoesser N, Giess A, Batty EM, Sheppard AE, Walker AS, Wilson DJ, Didelot X, Bashir A, Sebra R, Kasarskis A, Sthapit B, Shakya M, Kelly D, Pollard AJ, Peto TE, Crook DW, Donnelly P, Thorson S, Amatya P, Joshi S. 2014. Genome sequencing of an extended series of NDM-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from neonatal infections in a Nepali hospital characterizes the extent of community- versus hospital-associated transmission in an endemic setting. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:7347–7357. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03900-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Carvalho-Assef AP, Pereira PS, Albano RM, Beriao GC, Tavares CP, Chagas TP, Marques EA, Timm LN, Da Silva RC, Falci DR, Asensi MD. 2014. Detection of NDM-1-, CTX-M-15-, and qnrB4-producing Enterobacter hormaechei isolates in Brazil. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:2475–2476. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02804-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Huang TW, Chen TL, Chen YT, Lauderdale TL, Liao TL, Lee YT, Chen CP, Liu YM, Lin AC, Chang YH, Wu KM, Kirby R, Lai JF, Tan MC, Siu LK, Chang CM, Fung CP, Tsai SF. 2013. Copy number change of the NDM-1 sequence in a multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolate. PLoS One 8:e62774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Villa L, Poirel L, Nordmann P, Carta C, Carattoli A. 2012. Complete sequencing of an IncH plasmid carrying the blaNDM-1, blaCTX-M-15 and qnrB1 genes. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:1645–1650. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Poirel L, Benouda A, Hays C, Nordmann P. 2011. Emergence of NDM-1-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in Morocco. J Antimicrob Chemother 66:2781–2783. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wang JF, Chou KC. 2011. Insights from modeling the 3D structure of New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamse and its binding interactions with antibiotic drugs. PLoS One 6:e18414. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zhang H, Hao Q. 2011. Crystal structure of NDM-1 reveals a common beta-lactam hydrolysis mechanism. FASEB J 25:2574–2582. doi: 10.1096/fj.11-184036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Rossolini GM, D'Andrea MM, Mugnaioli C. 2008. The spread of CTX-M-type extended-spectrum beta-lactamases. Clin Microbiol Infect 14(Suppl 1):S33–S41 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01867.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Pfeifer Y, Cullik A, Witte W. 2010. Resistance to cephalosporins and carbapenems in Gram-negative bacterial pathogens. Int J Med Microbiol 300:371–379. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2010.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Jacoby GA. 2009. AmpC beta-lactamases. Clin Microbiol Rev 22:161–182. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00036-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Warner DM, Yang Q, Duval V, Chen M, Xu Y, Levy SB. 2013. Involvement of MarR and YedS in carbapenem resistance in a clinical isolate of Escherichia coli from China. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:1935–1937. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02445-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Rogers BA, Sidjabat HE, Paterson DL. 2011. Escherichia coli O25b-ST131: a pandemic, multiresistant, community-associated strain. J Antimicrob Chemother 66:1–14. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Poirel L, Savov E, Nazli A, Trifonova A, Todorova I, Gergova I, Nordmann P. 2014. Outbreak caused by NDM-1- and RmtB-producing Escherichia coli in Bulgaria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:2472–2474. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02571-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Peirano G, Ahmed-Bentley J, Woodford N, Pitout JD. 2011. New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase from traveler returning to Canada. Emerg Infect Dis 17:242–244. doi: 10.3201/eid1702.101313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mushtaq S, Irfan S, Sarma JB, Doumith M, Pike R, Pitout J, Livermore DM, Woodford N. 2011. Phylogenetic diversity of Escherichia coli strains producing NDM-type carbapenemases. J Antimicrob Chemother 66:2002–2005. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Castanheira M, Deshpande LM, Farrell SE, Shetye S, Shah N, Jones RN. 2013. Update on the prevalence and genetic characterization of NDM-1-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Indian hospitals during 2010. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 75:210–213. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yoo JS, Kim HM, Koo HS, Yang JW, Yoo JI, Kim HS, Park HK, Lee YS. 2013. Nosocomial transmission of NDM-1-producing Escherichia coli ST101 in a Korean hospital. J Antimicrob Chemother 68:2170–2172. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Pannaraj PS, Bard JD, Cerini C, Weissman SJ. 2015. Pediatric carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in Los Angeles, California, a high-prevalence region in the United States. Pediatr Infect Dis J 34:11–16. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
