Significance
We provide the first (to our knowledge) observation-based acidification trends in the water masses of the Atlantic basin over the past two decades and compare them with climate model results. Observations and model output confirm that pH changes in surface layers are dominated by the anthropogenic component. In mode and intermediate waters, the anthropogenic and natural components are of the same order of magnitude and sign. Large changes in the natural component of newly formed mode and intermediate waters are associated with latitudinal shifts of these water masses caused by the Southern Annular Mode in the South Atlantic and by changes in the rates of water mass formation in the North Atlantic.
Keywords: ocean acidification, pH, anthropogenic carbon, water masses, climate model
Abstract
Global ocean acidification is caused primarily by the ocean’s uptake of CO2 as a consequence of increasing atmospheric CO2 levels. We present observations of the oceanic decrease in pH at the basin scale (50°S–36°N) for the Atlantic Ocean over two decades (1993–2013). Changes in pH associated with the uptake of anthropogenic CO2 (ΔpHCant) and with variations caused by biological activity and ocean circulation (ΔpHNat) are evaluated for different water masses. Output from an Institut Pierre Simon Laplace climate model is used to place the results into a longer-term perspective and to elucidate the mechanisms responsible for pH change. The largest decreases in pH (∆pH) were observed in central, mode, and intermediate waters, with a maximum ΔpH value in South Atlantic Central Waters of −0.042 ± 0.003. The ΔpH trended toward zero in deep and bottom waters. Observations and model results show that pH changes generally are dominated by the anthropogenic component, which accounts for rates between −0.0015 and −0.0020/y in the central waters. The anthropogenic and natural components are of the same order of magnitude and reinforce one another in mode and intermediate waters over the time period. Large negative ΔpHNat values observed in mode and intermediate waters are driven primarily by changes in CO2 content and are consistent with (i) a poleward shift of the formation region during the positive phase of the Southern Annular Mode in the South Atlantic and (ii) an increase in the rate of the water mass formation in the North Atlantic.
The uptake of anthropogenic CO2 (Cant) by the ocean has lowered seawater pH since preindustrial times. This large-scale and long-term change is referred to as “ocean acidification,” a process that has led to changes in seawater carbonate chemistry (1–3) with impacts on the chemical speciation of seawater and biogeochemical cycles. A predominant effect is the decrease of carbonate ions in seawater that impacts calcareous marine organisms (4–6). The uptake of Cant is the main cause for the gradual reduction of seawater pH, but biological, physical, and chemical “natural” changes in the ocean, such as changes in the oxidation of organic matter, impact pH as well (7, 8).
Several studies have focused on ocean acidification in the last decade. Model-based studies have examined pH changes on a global scale (2, 9), and observation-based studies have focused on time-series stations (10–13) and specific regions such as the North Pacific (7, 14) and North Atlantic (8). However, investigations of basin-wide pH changes throughout the water column from direct measurements are sparse (15), in large part because of a dearth of quality referenced pH measurements.
In this study, we present the first (to our knowledge) measurement-based changes in pH along meridional lines in the Atlantic from 50°S–36°N using observations from three cruises: OACES/CO2 (1993), CITHER-II (1994), and FICARAM-XV (2013) (Fig. 1A and SI Appendix, Table S1). We investigate the total change in pH and refer to it as acidification. The change in pH is separated into anthropogenic (ΔpHCant) and natural (ΔpHNat) components and is evaluated for the water masses along the section over two decades (1993–2013). Both components are related to Cant uptake and to processes such as the remineralization of organic matter and changes in water mass. The observed pH changes are compared with outputs from an Institut Pierre Simon Laplace (IPSL) climate model to place the observations into context and to elucidate the mechanisms controlling anthropogenic and natural pH changes, which are clearly discerned in climate models.
Fig. 1.
(A, Left) Tracks of the OACES/CO2 (1993), CITHER-II (1994), and FICARAM-XV (2013) cruises used in this study. (Right) The vertical distribution of salinity along the FICARAM-XV cruise in 2013. (B, Left) IPSL model profile. (Right) The vertical distribution of salinity of the model. The horizontal white lines are the selected isopycnals used to delimit the main water masses. For the model, the isopycnals were chosen according to their thermohaline characteristics (SI Appendix, Table S1). The vertical white lines divide the study area into three regions: southern (50°S–14°S), equatorial (14°S–18°N), and northern (18°N–36°N). Water mass acronyms: AABW, Antarctic Bottom Water; AAIW, Antarctic Intermediate Water; CDW, Circumpolar Deep Water; NACW, North Atlantic Central Water; NADW, North Atlantic Deep Water; SACW, South Atlantic Central Water; SAMW, Subantarctic Mode Water. The lowercase first letters “u” and “l” denote the “upper” and “lower” varieties of some of the water masses. Ocean Data View was used for mapping.
Results
More than 4,000 pH measurements referenced to the seawater scale (SWS) at 25 °C in the Atlantic Ocean (50°S–36°N) were examined to estimate the changes in oceanic pH between 1993 and 2013. We used pH measurements referenced to the SWS at 25 °C throughout this discussion, because the thermodynamic temperature effect over pH did not affect the interpretation of the results. Changes in pH were evaluated for the major water masses identified along the section based on their hydrographic properties (16). We differentiated five water masses in the North Atlantic following Talley et al. (17) and six water masses in the South Atlantic following Mémery et al. (18). Potential density (σθ, σ3, σ4) intervals were used as a reference (Fig. 1 and SI Appendix, Table S2). Furthermore, we divided the study area into three regions: southern (50°S–14°S), equatorial (14°S–18°N), and northern (18°N–36°N) (Fig. 1).
The overall patterns in pH distribution along this section in the Atlantic were similar in 1993–94 and 2013 (Fig. 2A and SI Appendix, Fig. S1). The highest pH values were found in South Atlantic Central Water (SACW) and upper North Atlantic Central Water (uNACW), with values up to 8.05 in the south and 7.9 in the north. The upper water values in the equatorial region were below 7.6. Along the southern region, the mixing of Antarctic Intermediate Water (AAIW), Subantarctic Mode Water (SAMW), and upper Circumpolar Deep Water (uCDW) in frontal zones led to intermediate pH values of ∼7.7–7.6. The lowest pH values (<7.5) were in the AAIW layer of the equatorial region. The zonal circulation of the Equatorial Intermediate Current and the branches of the Northern South Equatorial Current and South Equatorial Countercurrent (19) were associated with pH minima. These pH minima were located in regions of high remineralization of organic matter, coinciding with oxygen minima centered at 13°S and 10°N (20). The Circumpolar Deep Water (CDW) and Antarctic Bottom Water (AABW) in the Southern Ocean were characterized by low pH values (∼7.6).
Fig. 2.
Vertical distributions of (A) pH at 25 °C on the seawater scale (SWS) along 2013 and (B) pHSWS changes (ΔpH) between 2013 and 1993–94. Ocean Data View was used for mapping. Note that the depth scale is not linear.
Small but discernable changes in pH were observed over the two decades, especially in the layers above a depth of 2,000 m. These changes in pH (ΔpH), with negative values indicating a decrease in pH, were revealed by decreases throughout most of the water column (Fig. 2B). The greatest acidification was detected in the southern region from the surface to depths greater than 1,000 m. In this area, the average ΔpH reached −0.042 in the SACW, −0.037 in the SAMW, and −0.029 in the AAIW (Fig. 2B and Table 1). The northern region showed relatively strong acidification with average ΔpH values of −0.033 in the uNACW, −0.040 in the lower North Atlantic Central Water (lNACW), and −0.012 in the AAIW. Acidification was much weaker in the upper water column in the equatorial region. For example, ΔpH in the uCDW−uNADW layer was about two times higher in the southern and northern regions than in the equatorial region (−0.010 versus −0.005). Deeper in the water column, ΔpH values were similar along the transect, ranging from −0.006 to −0.007 in the lower Circumpolar Deep Water (lCDW)–lower North Atlantic Deep Water (lNADW) layer and up to −0.008 in the AABW layer.
Table 1.
Average values and SDs of each variable in each layer and region
| Region | Layer | N | ΔpH⋅103 | ΔpHCant⋅103 | ΔpHNat⋅103 | ΔCant, μmol/kg | ΔCant-TTD, μmol/kg | ΔNO3, μmol/kg | ΔpHCant-IPSL⋅103 | 3.92xstd(pHNat) IPSL⋅103 |
| Southern 50°S–14°S | SACW | 80 | −42.1 ± 24.5 | −38.8 ± 4.2 | −5.5 ± 18.0 | 20.7 ± 2.6 | 19.2 ± 1.7 | -0.04 ± 1.21 | −34.2 ± 5.7 | 13.7 ± 5.0 |
| SAMW | 132 | −36.5 ± 23.4 | −33.2 ± 11.4 | -0.4 ± 20.9 | 14.5 ± 5.5 | 13.9 ± 2.8 | -0.14 ± 1.41 | −32.5 ± 8.4 | 20.0 ± 5.5 | |
| AAIW | 230 | −28.9 ± 13.9 | −18.0 ± 9.4 | −13.3 ± 13.1 | 6.8 ± 3.6 | 9.7 ± 3.3 | 0.32 ± 0.86 | −12.2 ± 8.1 | 18.3 ± 11.5 | |
| uCDW | 401 | −8.5 ± 13.7 | −9.8 ± 6.7 | -0.1 ± 9.5 | 3.8 ± 2.6 | 2.6 ± 1.2 | −0.27 ± 0.77 | 0.3 ± 2.5 | 8.9 ± 7.1 | |
| lCDW | 48 | −5.6 ± 13.3 | −7.3 ± 6.6 | 5.2 ± 3.9 | 3.0 ± 2.6 | 1.9 ± 0.5 | −0.53 ± 0.51 | −2.0 ± 4.0 | 15.3 ± 7.5 | |
| AABW | 181 | −7.9 ± 7.0 | −7.7 ± 5.5 | 3.0 ± 3.8 | 2.9 ± 2.1 | 2.8 ± 0.6 | −0.57 ± 0.65 | −4.4 ± 6.4 | 17.7 ± 3.5 | |
| Equatorial 14°S–18°N | SACW | 27 | −19.7 ± 41.1 | −30.0 ± 10.3 | 0.2 ± 30.8 | 14.7 ± 5.9 | 15.1 ± 2.7 | 0.54 ± 2.49 | −27.6 ± 4.9 | 14.4 ± 7.2 |
| SAMW | 64 | −24.2 ± 30.0 | −16.2 ± 10.7 | −9.2 ± 31.7 | 6.3 ± 4.2 | 8.5 ± 1.6 | 0.30 ± 1.58 | −20.2 ± 2.2 | 12.7 ± 4.9 | |
| AAIW | 118 | −13.6 ± 18.6 | −3.8 ± 7.7 | −12.2 ± 17.1 | 1.4 ± 2.7 | 3.6 ± 1.1 | 0.30 ± 0.96 | −12.5 ± 3.0 | 6.6 ± 1.5 | |
| uCDW | 205 | −4.7 ± 10.2 | −3.0 ± 6.7 | −1.9 ± 7.4 | 1.3 ± 2.7 | 1.7 ± 0.5 | 0.04 ± 0.72 | −4.4 ± 2.5 | 5.1 ± 1.6 | |
| lCDW | 78 | −4.4 ± 6.4 | −3.0 ± 4.4 | -0.7 ± 5.2 | 1.3 ± 1.8 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 0.25 ± 0.56 | −1.5 ± 3.0 | 6.3 ± 3.0 | |
| AABW | 41 | −6.4 ± 6.2 | −2.9 ± 6.4 | 1.7 ± 6.7 | 1.2 ± 2.5 | 1.4 ± 0.4 | −0.28 ± 0.34 | −9.0 ± 1.1 | 10.3 ± 1.0 | |
| Northern 18°N–36°N | uNACW | 38 | −33.3 ± 29.5 | −30.6 ± 6.6 | −13.4 ± 18.6 | 15.8 ± 4.4 | 16.9 ± 2.2 | 1.18 ± 1.73 | −33.3 ± 7.3 | 19.1 ± 6.1 |
| lNACW | 23 | −39.5 ± 21.8 | −15.4 ± 8.1 | −19.9 ± 18.5 | 6.4 ± 3.4 | 9.1 ± 3.1 | 1.03 ± 0.81 | −19.3 ± 3.4 | 9.9 ± 3.0 | |
| AAIW | 35 | −12.1 ± 13.8 | −8.4 ± 7.0 | −7.1 ± 12.0 | 3.4 ± 2.8 | 3.7 ± 2.1 | 0.08 ± 0.70 | −13.9 ± 3.4 | 4.6 ± 1.2 | |
| uNADW | 63 | −11.2 ± 8.9 | −7.4 ± 6.4 | −3.8 ± 7.0 | 3.1 ± 2.7 | 1.9 ± 1.3 | -0.02 ± 0.48 | −8.4 ± 3.8 | 5.3 ± 1.2 | |
| lNADW | 52 | −6.9 ± 5.5 | −3.4 ± 3.6 | −3.6 ± 4.3 | 1.4 ± 1.5 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 0.26 ± 0.33 | 0.0 ± 1.6 | 3.8 ± 1.9 |
Average values and SDs for each layer and region of pH change (ΔpH); the anthropogenic component of ΔpH (ΔpHCant); the natural component of ΔpH (ΔpHNat); the anthropogenic CO2 change estimated by the φCT0 method (ΔCant) and by the TTD method (ΔCant-TTD); the change in nitrate (ΔNO3) between 1993–94 and 2013 from observations; and ΔpHCant and ΔpHNat [= 3.92xstd(pHNat)] from the IPSL model. Italics indicate values that are not statistically significant (Student’s t test <0.05). Column N indicates the number of values within each layer. See Fig. 1 for water mass acronyms.
The ΔpH was separated into changes associated with the increase in Cant in the ocean (ΔpHCant) and those associated with a modification in total inorganic carbon (CT) resulting from the remineralization of organic matter and changes in ocean circulation (ΔpHNat). To separate the anthropogenic and natural components of ΔpH, a pH value (pH2013-ant) was computed for 2013 from thermodynamic equations that included total alkalinity (AT) and the nonanthropogenic changes in CT (CT − ΔCant). This computation yielded the anthropogenic CT component of the pH change (ΔpHCant = pH2013 − pH2013-ant), where pH2013 is the measured pH. The natural component (ΔpHNat) equaled ΔpH − ΔpHCant over the 20-y timespan. Cant concentrations were determined by the carbon-based φCT0 method (21, 22), with an SD in the changes in Cant (ΔCant) of ±2.7 μmol/kg. This SD translates into an uncertainty of 0.005 in ΔpHCant and ΔpHNat (SI Appendix, SI Text). To avoid biases in ΔpHNat caused by water mass mixing, the ΔpHNat was corrected for these effects using changes in potential temperature (Δθ) in the water masses from 1993 to 2013 (SI Appendix, Table S3).
Based on this analysis, the uptake of Cant by the ocean has been the main contributor to ΔpH over the last two decades (Table 1). As expected, ΔpHCant and ΔCant distributions showed similar patterns (Fig. 3 A and D), with the highest changes located in the upper layer in contact with the atmosphere. There is a clear south-to-north gradient, with ΔpHCant values in the southern region being about twice as large as in the equatorial and northern regions. In the surface layers, ΔpHCant reached values up to −0.039 in the southern region (SACW) and −0.030 in the equatorial and northern regions (SACW–uNACW), coinciding with the highest ΔCant values of 21 and 15 µmol/kg, respectively (Table 1). In the subsurface layer (SAMW–lNACW), ΔpHCant also showed higher absolute average values in the southern region (−0.033) than in the equatorial and northern regions (0.016), in agreement with the ΔCant values of 15 and 6 µmol/kg, respectively (Fig. 3 A and D and Table 1). Deeper in the ocean, ΔpHCant values dropped from around −0.018 (ΔCant ∼7 µmol/kg) in the southern AAIW layer to between −0.003 and −0.010 (ΔCant ∼1–4 µmol/kg) in the CDW and AABW layers. ΔpHCant and ΔCant were strongly correlated because ΔpHCant is caused directly by anthropogenic CO2 entering the ocean and because ΔpHCant is computed from ΔCant (see above). Determining ΔCant by an independent method [transit time distribution (TTD)] in which no CO2 measurements were used (23) yielded the same results (SI Appendix, Fig. S2).
Fig. 3.
Vertical distributions of changes between 1993/94 and 2013 in (A) the anthropogenic component of ΔpH (ΔpHCant), (B) the natural component of ΔpH (ΔpHNat), (C) ΔpHNat variability in the IPSL model [3.92 × std(pHNat)], (D) anthropogenic CO2 (ΔCant) expressed in micromoles per kilogram, (E) nitrate (ΔNO3) expressed in micromoles per kilogram, and (F) the absolute value in B [abs(ΔpHNat)] to show the magnitude of variability. Ocean Data View was used for mapping. Note that the depth scale is not linear.
ΔpHNat includes changes in pH related to changes in ocean circulation and/or biological activity, which are driven by natural variability and climate change. The pH changes associated with climate change were estimated to be less than 0.0001/y, i.e., <0.002 over the past two decades (9). We corrected ΔpHNat for mixing between the water masses by using the changes in potential temperature (Δθ) (SI Appendix, Table S3). ΔpHNat, therefore, primarily captured the natural interannual and decadal variability of the ocean’s circulation and carbon cycle. This interannual-to-decadal variability was particularly pronounced in the higher latitudes of the North Atlantic (12, 24) and South Atlantic (25–28). ΔpHNat was generally lower than ΔpHCant, except in mode and intermediate waters (i.e., SAMW, lNACW, and AAIW), where ΔpHNat and ΔpHCant had similar magnitudes with rates up to −0.0010 ± 0.0002/y (Fig. 4A and Table 1). ΔpHNat patterns closely matched the patterns of changes in nitrate (ΔNO3) corrected for mixing using Δθ (Fig. 3 B and E). The correlation coefficient (r2) obtained between ΔpHNat and ΔNO3 for all the water masses was 0.63, with a slope of −0.012 ± 0.002 and P < 0.01 (Fig. 4B). The relationship between ΔpHNat and ΔNO3 is attributed to remineralization. The slope indicates that 0.012 units of pH change correspond to 1 µmol of NO3. Thus a change of 0.001 units of pH is equivalent to 0.52 µmol of CO2, from which a stoichiometric C:N ratio of 6.2, close to the Redfield ratio of 6.6, was obtained (29). Central and mode waters showed the largest changes in ΔpHNat (±0.030) and ΔNO3 (±3 µmol/kg), findings that are in agreement with the spatial and temporal variability of the ocean’s circulation and biology being stronger in the upper waters (Fig. 3 B and E). The intermediate water class with the largest change was the AAIW, with ΔpHNat up to −0.013 and ΔNO3 up to 0.32 µmol/kg. The smallest changes occurred in the deep and bottom waters (±0.005 pH units and changes in NO3 of ±0.5 µmol/kg) (Fig. 3 B and E and Table 1).
Fig. 4.

(A) Observed ΔpHNat versus ΔpHCant, (B) Observed ΔpHNat versus ΔNO3 (expressed in micromoles per kilogram ) in the different layers of the three regions. ΔpHNat*1000 = −11.55 ± 2.26·ΔNO3 = − 0.1 ± 1.1; r2 = 0.63; P < 0.01. (C) ΔpHCant-PSL versus ΔpHCant-Observations. ΔpHCant = 0.92 ± 0.11·ΔpHCant-IPSL − 0.0009 ± 0.0019; r2 = 0.83; P < 0.01. Error bars represent the SEM. Layers: Surface (SACW, uNACW), mode and intermediate (SAMW, lNACW, AAIW), deep (uCDW, uNADW, lCDW, lNADW), and bottom (AABW). (See Fig. 1 for water mass acronyms).
Discussion
The observed changes in pH in near-surface/upper waters were in general agreement with changes expected because of anthropogenic CO2. However, there was an appreciable signal resulting from natural variability that was particularly pronounced in the intermediate waters and near-frontal systems. Surface layers showed acidification rates up to −0.0021 ± 0.0012/y in the South Atlantic, and high acidification rates also were observed in the water masses along the ventilation pathways, namely, mode waters with rates up to −0.0018 ± 0.0012/y in the South Atlantic and −0.0017 ± 0.0015/y in the North Atlantic. Intermediate waters showed changes up to −0.0014 ± 0.0007/y, whereas deep waters in the South Atlantic showed smaller changes of approximately −0.0004 ± 0.0003/y. Although, on average, acidification rates were higher in near-surface waters, the highest local values were observed in subsurface mode waters between the depths of 200 and 500 m. Higher acidification rates (i.e., more negative pH) in subsurface waters were in agreement with the high acidification rates observed in the subsurface waters at the ALOHA (A Long-term Oligotrophic Habitat Assessment) and BATS (Bermuda Atlantic Time-Series) time-series stations (12, 14) in the South Atlantic (30) and along a North Pacific section (7), respectively.
For the first time, to our knowledge, our observations confirm the major role of mode and intermediate waters (MW–IW) at the basin scale in the acidification of the ocean interior, which also was evidenced in the climate models (9). The high rates of acidification are attributed to the lower buffering capacity of mode waters compared with surface waters, because mode waters have a lower temperature and AT/CT ratio and therefore are more sensitive to increasing oceanic CT (9, 10). In addition, mode waters have a larger exposure to the atmosphere, with a surface area-to-volume ratio five to 10 times larger than that of deeper waters, thus enabling a larger uptake of atmospheric CO2 and, hence, stronger acidification (9).
The observed changes in pH in surface waters were largely of anthropogenic origin (Fig. 4A). The rates associated with anthropogenic forcing, ranging from −0.0015 to −0.0020/y, were found throughout the Atlantic surface waters from 50°S–36°N and are similar to rates previously reported in the South Atlantic (30) and by the European Station for Time Series in the Ocean in the North Atlantic (11). Modeling studies have confirmed the dominant role of atmospheric anthropogenic forcing on pH changes in the surface layers (2, 31). We found larger values of ΔpHCant, associated with larger ΔCant, in the South Atlantic than in the North Atlantic. The larger ΔCant in the south compared with the north is attributed partly to the southern transects of the cruises having been located in the western Atlantic, whereas the northern transects were located in the eastern Atlantic. Mode and deep water formation are concentrated in the western Atlantic in both hemispheres. Water masses in the northeastern region of the section are expected to be older than in the southwestern region and to have lower ΔCant values. However, another process probably explains why ΔCant and ΔpHCant were weaker in the North Atlantic. In the subpolar region of the North Atlantic, a weakening in the formation of Labrador Sea Water led to a decrease in the relative Cant inventory of North Atlantic Deep Water (NADW) from 1997 to 2003 (32) and to a smaller change in ΔpHCant. In contrast, a larger increase in the Cant inventory was found in the South Atlantic compared with the North Atlantic from 1989 to 2005 (33), possibly related to the Southern Annular Mode (SAM) affecting the uptake of Cant in the South Atlantic and to the North Atlantic Oscillation shift impacting ΔpHCant in the North Atlantic (34).
Our observations show that the anthropogenic and natural components had a similar magnitude in the MW–IW (Fig. 4A), indicating that changes in ocean circulation and biological activity contributed significantly to pH variability in the subsurface waters of the Atlantic Ocean over this time period. The observations were placed in the context of changes occurring in a larger space and time domain by comparing them with pH changes from the IPSL Earth System Model. This model objectively assessed the separation of ∆pH into ΔpHCant and ΔpHNat. The distribution of ΔpHCant in IPSL, referred to as “ΔpHCant-IPSL,” followed the distribution obtained from the observations, with the largest changes in surface, mode, and intermediate waters associated with water mass ventilation and anthropogenic CO2 uptake (Fig. 4C). The good correspondence between the model and the observations is reflected by a correlation between ΔpHCant-IPSL and ΔpHCant of 0.92 ± 0.11 and an intercept of −0.0009 ± 0.0019 (r2 = 0.83, P < 0.01).
The IPSL simulations spanned the period from 1850 to 2014 and included the entire Atlantic Ocean, allowing the interannual-to-decadal variability of ΔpHNat determined during the 1993–94 and 2013 cruises to be placed in a larger context. Because climate models statistically represent the natural variability of the ocean–atmosphere system but not necessarily its exact timing (28), the variability patterns of ΔpHNat-IPSL are described in terms of the SD of the values along the cruise transect and are compared with the amplitude of the observed ΔpHNat [abs(ΔpHNat)] (Fig. 3 C and F). The comparison between the model and the observations therefore was not exact, because one is an SD over 164 y and the other is the difference between two sections over 20 y. The observed changes and modeled ΔpHNat variability presented similar patterns, with large changes in the surface layers and in the MW–IW of the southern and northern regions (Fig. 3 B and E). The ΔpHNat in the equatorial region was smaller in the model than in the observations. However, the observed ΔpHNat was uncertain in surface, mode, and intermediate waters in the equatorial region, because these water masses are compressed into a thin layer of about 120 m with few measurements.
The model output was used to elucidate the controls of the large ΔpHNat in the MW–IW of the northern and southern regions. The observations showed a strong relationship between ΔpHNat and ΔNO3 (Fig. 3 B and E) and between ΔpHNat and the apparent oxygen utilization (AOU) (SI Appendix, Fig. S3), which suggests that pHNat changes were mostly the result of changes in CT from biological remineralization. The strong relationship between ΔpHNat and ΔNO3 also was found in the MW–IW of the IPSL model, with 0.013 units of pH change per micromole of NO3 (r2 = 0.93). The model showed that 80% of the ΔpHNat could be explained by changes in CT, whereas AT accounted for 15–20% of the changes, and salinity accounted for less than 10% of the changes (Fig. 5A). For the pHNat variations attributed to CT changes, 50–65% corresponded to the physical transport of CT by ocean circulation, and 15–30% corresponded to in situ biological remineralization of organic matter within the water mass (Fig. 5A). The strong correlation between ΔpHNat and ΔNO3 supports the notion that the increase in CT controlled the observed pHNat changes but that transport of respired carbon was the main contributor, rather than local biological remineralization.
Fig. 5.

ΔpHNat in mode and intermediate waters (MW–IW) over the Atlantic Ocean (80°S–65°N) in the IPSL model. (A) Contribution to ΔpHNat associated with changes in salinity (S, cyan), changes in normalized AT (nAT, red), and changes in normalized CT (nCT) caused by physical transport (blue) and biological activity (green). (B and C) ΔpHNat time-series in newly formed MW–IW in the South Atlantic (B) and North Atlantic (C). Anomalies in latitude, volume of formed waters, AOU, SAM index, and North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) index also are shown with their correlation coefficient to ΔpHNat.
The largest observed and modeled pHNat changes in the MW–IW occurred where the water masses were formed and subjected to variability in surface forcing south of 40°S (Fig. 3 C and F). In the South Atlantic, the modeled ΔpHNat in newly formed water depended on the latitude where the formation occurred (Fig. 5B). Formation at higher latitudes led to the subduction of higher-CT/lower-AT waters, thereby decreasing ΔpHNat, with the opposite holding true if formation occurred at lower latitudes. In agreement with previous studies (35, 36), the model results suggest that the SAM might explain part of the latitudinal shift. The positive phase of the SAM shifts westerly winds and the MW–IW subduction poleward (Fig. 5B). Additionally, the positive phase of SAM increases the upwelling, northward Ekman transport, and subduction of CT-enriched CDW into the MW–IW (37), thereby making ΔpHNat more negative. This mechanism was supported further by the higher AOU found in association with lower pHNat in both the observations (SI Appendix, Fig. S3) and the model (Fig. 5B). It explains the large observed decrease in pHNat in the MW–IW south of 40°S between 1993 and 2013 (Fig. 3C), because in this period the SAM trended positive.
In the North Atlantic, at the mode and intermediate outcrop, ΔpHNat variability in the model depended on the volume of newly formed water (Fig. 5C). When larger volumes of MW–IW were formed, a larger proportion of the deeper CO2- and AOU-rich waters of northern origin were subducted (SI Appendix, Fig. S4), leading to more negative ΔpHNat. There is observational evidence that the winter-mixed layer depth (38), volume, and AOU content (39) of the MW–IW in the North Atlantic have increased over the past decades. This mechanism could explain the decrease in pHNat observed in the MW–IW in the North Atlantic between 1993 and 2013.
In summary, the observations and model show that decreases in the pH of near-surface waters are dominated by the contribution of Cant. In the MW–IW, anthropogenic and natural components are of the same order of magnitude and are in the same direction from 1993 to 2013, with natural changes reinforcing the anthropogenic acidification signal. The observations and model output confirm that, although carbonate chemistry and geochemical properties of the water masses are crucial for explaining long-term changes in pH and oxygen levels (3, 9), changes in ocean circulation and biological production (13, 14, 40) also exert a large impact on pH on interannual-to-decadal time scales in subsurface waters. Based on projections of future increases in atmospheric CO2 and the associated penetration of Cant into intermediate and deep waters, the contribution of anthropogenic forcing to the acidification of subsurface waters will increase with time and eventually will exceed natural variability and trends.
Materials and Methods
Data Processing.
To obtain the changes in the variables (pH, Cant, Cant-TTD, θ, and NO3) between 1993–94 and 2013, we used the position and depth of the 100 stations of the FICARAM-XV line as a base. Data from the 94 stations of CITHER-II and the 42 stations of OACES/CO2 that coincided with the FICARAM-XV line were interpolated to the station positions and depths of FICARAM-XV using a Delaunay triangulation to obtain an interpolated dataset with the same grid for both periods. This interpolated dataset allowed us to determine differences in the variables over the 20-y time period. For Table 1, we determined an average and SD for all of the values in a particular water mass (“layer”) for each region. More details on the datasets can be found in SI Appendix, Table S1.
Uncertainties.
The uncertainty of ΔpH amounted to 0.0035 based on the analytical uncertainty of each pH dataset (0.001, 0.003, and 0.0015 for OACES/CO2, CITHER-II, and FICARAM-XV, respectively). The uncertainty of Cant was based on a propagation of error for each of the variables used in the calculation that yielded an SD of ΔCant of 2.7 μmol/kg. This calculation translates to an uncertainty of 0.005 in ∆pHCant and ΔpHNat, which is the maximum error for ΔpHCant as shown in SI Appendix, SI Text.
The IPSL Climate Model.
The low-resolution (LR) IPSL climate model (IPSL-CM5A-LR), which participated in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (10) was used. The IPSL simulations covered the period from 1850 to 2014. They included sensitivity experiments separating anthropogenic perturbations from natural variability and climate-induced feedbacks. Four IPSL simulations were investigated: (i) the historical run from 1850 to 2005, with increasing CO2 concentrations and changes in radiative forcing such as volcanoes and aerosols; (ii) an “intermediate” representative concentration pathway (RCP4.5) for the period 2006–2014, characterized by an additional radiative forcing of 4.5 W/m2 and corresponding to a CO2 atmospheric concentration of 538 ppm in 2100; (iii) a sensitivity experiment (esmFdbk2) from 1850 to 2014 that included the increased radiative forcing of scenario RCP4.5 but with no increase in atmospheric CO2 (this scenario represents climate change and variability without Cant entering the ocean and corresponding to ∆pHCant); and (iv) a control simulation (piControl) from 1850 to 2014 that included only internal variability in the model with no changes in forcing or atmospheric CO2. This simulation was used to correct for possible model drift. The esmFdbk2 simulation was used to isolate pHNat, that is, the contribution of natural variability and climate change feedbacks, such as changes in ocean circulation and biological activity, from the chemical effects of increasing CO2 concentration. Once the pHNat contribution was removed from the historical run, ΔpHCant-IPSL was computed from the difference between 2013 and 1993.5 at the 111 profiles of the FICARAM-XV section using the model pixel closest to the station location (Fig. 1B). The ΔpHNat-IPSL was estimated using the interannual anomaly of pHNat over the 164 y of the simulation, and std(ΔpHNat-IPSL) was based on the 95% confidence interval of ΔpHNat-IPSL (±1.96 × SD, i.e., 3.92 × SD). Although the model results were compared with observations along the cruise transect (Fig. 1B), the processes regulating ΔpHNat in the MW–IW were computed for the entire Atlantic basin (80°S–65°N). The SAM index was computed based on sea-level pressure.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank the officers and crews of the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) ship Malcolm Baldrige, Research Vessel (R/V) Maurice Ewing, and R/V Hespérides, along with the scientific and technical teams, for their support during the OACES/CO2, CITHER-II, and FICARAM-XV cruises; Gail Derr of the Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory of the NOAA for copyediting the manuscript; and the editor and two anonymous reviewers for their critical reading and constructive comments. This research was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Sciences and Innovation and was cofunded by the European Regional Development Fund 2007–2012 (FEDER) through the Carbon Transport and Acidification Rates in the North Atlantic Project (CTM2010-17141/MAR), by the European Union Seventh Framework Programme CARBOCHANGE project under Grant Agreement 264879, and by the Office of Atmospheric and Oceanic Research of the NOAA.
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1504613112/-/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.Caldeira K, Wickett ME. Oceanography: Anthropogenic carbon and ocean pH. Nature. 2003;425(6956):365. doi: 10.1038/425365a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Orr JC, et al. Anthropogenic ocean acidification over the twenty-first century and its impact on calcifying organisms. Nature. 2005;437(7059):681–686. doi: 10.1038/nature04095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Orr JC. Recent and future changes in ocean carbonate chemistry. In: Gatuso JP, Hansson L, editors. Ocean Acidification. Oxford Univ Press; Oxford, UK: 2011. pp. 41–66. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Feely RA, et al. Impact of anthropogenic CO2 on the CaCO3 system in the oceans. Science. 2004;305(5682):362–366. doi: 10.1126/science.1097329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Doney SC, Fabry VJ, Feely RA, Kleypas JA. Ocean acidification: The other CO2 problem. Annu Rev Mar Sci. 2009;1:169–192. doi: 10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hofmann GE, et al. The effects of ocean acidification on calcifying organisms in marine ecosystems: An organism to ecosystem perspective. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2010;41:127–147. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Byrne RH, Mecking S, Feely RA, Liu X. Direct observations of basin-wide acidification of the North Pacific Ocean. Geophys Res Lett. 2010;37:L02601. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Vázquez-Rodríguez M, Pérez FF, Velo A, Ríos AF, Mercier M. Observed trends of anthropogenic acidification in North Atlantic water masses. Biogeosciences. 2012;9:5217–5230. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Resplandy L, Bopp L, Orr JC, Dunne JP. Role of mode and intermediate waters in future ocean acidification: Analysis of CMIP5 models. Geophys Res Lett. 2013;40:1–5. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Olafsson J, et al. Rate of Iceland Sea acidification from time series measurements. Biogeosciences. 2009;6:2661–2668. [Google Scholar]
- 11.González-Dávila M, Santana-Casiano JM, Rueda M-J, Llinás O. The water column distribution of carbonate system variables at the ESTOC site from 1995 to 2004. Biogeosciences. 2010;7:3067–3081. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bates NR, et al. Detecting anthropogenic carbon dioxide uptake and ocean acidification in the North Atlantic Ocean. Biogeosciences. 2012;9:2509–2522. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wakita M, et al. Ocean acidification from 1997 to 2011 in the subarctic western North Pacific Ocean. Biogeosciences. 2013;10:7817–7827. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dore JE, Lukas R, Sadler DW, Church MJ, Karl DM. Physical and biogeochemical modulation of ocean acidification in the central North Pacific. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(30):12235–12240. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906044106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lauvset SK, Gruber N, Landschützer P, Olsen A, Tjiputra J. Trends and drivers in global surface ocean pH over the past three decades. Biogeosciences. 2015;12:1285–1298. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ríos AF, Velo A, Pardo PC, Hoppema M, Pérez FF. An update of anthropogenic CO2 storage rates in the western South Atlantic basin and the role of Antarctic Bottom Water. J Mar Syst. 2012;94:197–203. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Talley LD, Pickard GL, Emery WJ, Swift JH. Atlantic Ocean. In: Talley LD, Pickard GL, Emery WJ, Swift JH, editors. Descriptive Physical Oceanography: An Introduction. Academic; Boston: 2011. pp. 245–301. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mémery L, et al. The water masses along the western boundary of the south and equatorial Atlantic. Prog Oceanogr. 2000;47:69–98. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Stramma L, England M. On the water masses and main circulation of the South Atlantic Ocean. J Geophys Res. 1999;104(C9):20863–20883. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wienders N, Arhan M, Mercier H. Circulation at the western boundary of the South and Equatorial Atlantic: Exchanges with the ocean interior. J Mar Res. 2000;58:1007–1039. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Vázquez-Rodríguez M, et al. Anthropogenic carbon distributions in the Atlantic Ocean: Data-based estimates from the Arctic to the Antarctic. Biogeosciences. 2009;6:4527–4571. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Vázquez-Rodríguez M, Padín XA, Ríos AF, Pérez FF. The subsurface layer memory of water mass formation conditions in the Atlantic: A reliable reference to estimate preformed properties and air-sea CO2 disequilibria. J Mar Syst. 2012;92:52–63. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Waugh D, Hall TM, McNeil BI, Key R, Matear RJ. Anthropogenic CO2 in the oceans estimated using transit time distributions. Tellus B Chem Phys Meterol. 2006;58:376–389. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Keller K, et al. Variability of the ocean carbon cycle in response to the North Atlantic Oscillation. Tellus B Chem Phys Meterol. 2012;64:18738. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lenton A, Matear RJ. Role of the Southern Annular Mode (SAM) in Southern Ocean CO2 uptake. Global Biogeochem Cycles. 2007;21:GB2016. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lovenduski NS, Gruber N, Doney SC. Toward a mechanistic understanding of the decadal trends in the Southern Ocean carbon sink. Global Biogeochem Cycles. 2008;22:GB3016. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Dufour CO, et al. Eddy compensation and controls of the enhanced sea-to-air CO2 flux during positive phases of the Southern Annular Mode. Global Biogeochem Cycles. 2013;27:950–961. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Levine NM, Doney SC, Wanninkhof R, Lindsay K, Fung IY. The impact of ocean carbon system variability on the detection of temporal increases in anthropogenic CO2. J Geophys Res. 2008;113:C03019. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Redfield AC, Ketchum BH, Richard FA. The influence of organisms on the composition of sea-water. In: Hill MN, editor. The Sea. Vol 2. J Wiley and Sons; New York: 1963. pp. 26–77. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Salt LA, van Heuven SMAC, Claus ME, Jones EM, de Baar HJW. Rapid acidification of mode and intermediate waters in the southwest Atlantic Ocean. Biogeosciences. 2015;12:1387–1401. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Friedrich T, et al. Detecting regional anthropogenic trends in ocean acidification against natural variability. Nat Clim Chang. 2012;2:167–171. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Steinfeldt R, Rhein M, Bullister JL, Tanhua T. Inventory changes in anthropogenic carbon from 1997–2003 in the Atlantic Ocean between 20°S and 65°N. Global Biogeochem Cycles. 2009;23:GB3010. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wanninkhof R, et al. Detecting anthropogenic CO2 changes in the interior Atlantic Ocean between 1989 and 2005. J Geophys Res. 2010;115:C11028. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Levine NM, et al. The impact of the North Atlantic Oscillation on the uptake and accumulation of anthropogenic CO2 by North Atlantic Ocean mode waters. Global Biogeochem Cycles. 2011;25:GB3022. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Oke PR, England MH. Oceanic response to changes in the latitude of the Southern Hemisphere subpolar westerly winds. J Clim. 2004;17:1040–1054. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Saenko OA, Fyfe JC, England MH. On the response of the oceanic wind-driven circulation to atmospheric CO2 increase. Clim Dyn. 2005;25:415–416. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ayers JM, Strutton PG. Nutrient variability in Subantarctic Mode Waters forced by the SAM and ENSO. Geophys Res Lett. 2013;40:3419–3423. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Carton JA, Grodsky SA, Liu H. Variability of the oceanic mixed layer, 1960–2004. J Clim. 2008;21:1029–1047. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Stendardo I, Kieke D, Rhein M, Gruber N, Steinfeldt R. Interannual to decadal oxygen variability in the mid-depth water masses of the eastern North Atlantic. Deep Sea Res Part I Oceanogr Res Pap. 2015;95:85–98. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Deutsch C, Emerson S, Thompson L. Physical-biological interactions in North Pacific oxygen variability. J Geophys Res. 2006;111:C09S90. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



