Skip to main content
Public Health Action logoLink to Public Health Action
. 2014 Jun 21;4(2):102–104. doi: 10.5588/pha.14.0001

HIV testing and retention in care of infants born to HIV- infected women enrolled in ‘Option B+’, Thyolo, Malawi

G Martínez Pérez 1, C Metcalf 1, D Garone 1,, R Coulborn 1, A D Harries 2,3, B Hedt-Gauthier 4, M Murowa 5, G S Mwenelupembe 1, R Van den Bergh 1, L Triviño Durán 1
PMCID: PMC4539033  PMID: 26399207

Abstract

Prevention of mother-to-child transmission ‘Option B+’ originated in Malawi in 2011 to prevent new infections in infants exposed to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). We assessed 12-month programme retention and HIV testing uptake among infants born to HIV-infected mothers from September 2011 to June 2012 in Thyolo District Hospital. Of 513 infants, 368 (71.7%) remained in care at 12 months. Altogether, 412 (80.3%) underwent HIV DNA polymerase chain reaction testing, with 267 (52.0%) tested at 6–12 weeks, and 255 (49.7%) underwent rapid HIV testing, with 144 (28.1%) tested at 12 months. Eighty-eight (17.2%) infants had both tests as scheduled. Measures are needed to improve adherence to national testing protocols.

Keywords: HIV guidelines, children's health, HIV testing, operational research, PMTCT


In 2012, 260 000 new cases of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in children occurred in sub-Saharan Africa, primarily due to mother-to-child transmission of HIV.1 However, childhood HIV infection can be prevented by the implementation of prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) strategies.

PMTCT ‘Option B+’ originated in Malawi in July 2011.2–5 With Option B+, all pregnant and breastfeeding women are offered HIV testing and counselling, and those who are HIV-infected are offered life-long antiretroviral treatment (ART) with tenofovir/lamivudine/efavirenz.2,6 HIV-exposed infants receive nevirapine from birth until 6 weeks of age.2,6 National guidelines recommend that all HIV-exposed infants undergo HIV DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing 6–8 weeks after birth and rapid HIV testing (RHT) at 12–24 months of age, and that those with HIV infection be started on ART immediately.4,6

Option B+ was endorsed by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2012 and included in the 2013 WHO ART guidelines.3 By June 2013, 588 health facilities were offering Option B+ in Malawi.7

A seven-fold increase in the number of women initiated on ART in the first year of Option B+ in Malawi was documented, with 77% retained in care at 12 months.8 More evidence, however, is needed on the management of HIV-exposed infants under routine conditions of Option B+ implementation.2,3,9 The aim of this study was to evaluate programme retention and uptake and timing of HIV testing among infants born to HIV-infected mothers enrolled in Option B+ at Thyolo District Hospital (TDH).

ASPECTS OF INTEREST

This was a retrospective study of routinely collected programme data. At TDH, the Ministry of Health (MoH) introduced Option B+ in October 2011, with support from Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF). Information on infants enrolled in Option B+ was abstracted from patient cards and entered into an MS Access® (Microsoft Corp, Redmond, WA, USA) database. All infants born at TDH to women in the Option B+ programme from October 2011 to June 2012 were included in the study. A descriptive analysis was performed using EpiData version 2.2.2.182 (EpiData Association, Odense, Denmark) to assess programme retention at 12 months and the uptake and timing of HIV testing.

Ethics approval for the study was granted by the Malawi National Health Sciences Research Committee, the MSF Ethics Review Board, and the Ethics Advisory Group of the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France.

There were 513 infants, of whom 277 (53.9%) were female. Programme retention at 12 (±1) months is shown in Table 1. Altogether, 368 (71.7%) infants were retained in care at TDH, 86 (16.8%) were lost to follow-up, 48 (9.4%) were transferred out and 4 (0.8%) died.

TABLE 1.

12-month outcomes in children born to HIV-infected mothers in Thyolo District Hospital, Malawi, October 2011–June 2012

graphic file with name i2220-8372-4-2-102-t01.jpg

Uptake of HIV testing is shown in Table 2. Of the 513 infants, 412 (80.7%) had a record of PCR testing, with 267 (52.0%) tested at 6–12 weeks; 255 (49.7%) had a record of RHT, with 144 (28.1%) tested at 12 (±1) months. Eighty-eight (17.2%) infants received both tests as specified in the national guidelines.

TABLE 2.

HIV testing performed according to national guidelines in children born to HIV-infected mothers in Thyolo District Hospital, Malawi, October 2011–June 2012

graphic file with name i2220-8372-4-2-102-t02.jpg

Twenty-one (4.1%) infants were documented as HIV-infected, and all had been started on ART by the age of 12 months. Of the 21 infants, HIV infection was diagnosed by PCR in 13 (2.5%) and by RHT in eight (1.5%).

DISCUSSION

This is the first study to report on 12-month programme retention and adherence to HIV testing recommendations in infants enrolled in Option B+ in TDH. Over 70% of children remained in care at 12 months, but <20% of infants were recorded as having received both HIV tests at specified times. There is therefore room for improvement in the uptake of PCR testing at 6–12 weeks and RHT at 12 months. An ongoing Option B+ programme evaluation in Thyolo District found that between April and June 2013, 80% of infants born to HIV-infected mothers who had enrolled in Option B+ during pregnancy had undergone PCR testing between 5 and 13 weeks.5

More emphasis is needed to address the programmatic challenges that prevent health providers from offering HIV testing to infants according to protocol. This includes building human resource capacity, addressing health staff and testing kit shortages, ensuring that no opportunities for testing are missed, that all tests are recorded on the infant′s clinic card at the time of sample collection, and follow-up of unreported test results with the laboratory. In addition, qualitative research would help to identify reasons for lack of adherence to HIV testing protocols so that current deficiencies can be addressed and to understand mothers′ barriers to accessing Option B+.

A limitation of this study is the completeness of routinely collected programme data: 236 results of PCR testing at 6–8 weeks were not captured. It was not possible to ascertain whether infants without PCR results were not tested, were tested but the result not received, or were tested and the result was received but not documented. In addition, the HIV status of the 125 infants who were transferred to another facility or lost to follow-up before the age of 12 months was not documented. Registers to log infant PCR results were introduced nationally by the MoH at the beginning of 2013. As these registers only record test results and do not identify infants due for PCR testing or those awaiting test results, additional measures are needed to ensure that all HIV-exposed infants are tested.

Option B+ was conceived with the vision of eliminating new cases of HIV infection among children. Early results show adequate uptake and retention of pregnant and breastfeeding women in Option B+,8,9 and this study shows good results for programme retention among HIV-exposed infants. It is likely that HIV infections in infants will decrease and that follow-up of exposed infants will improve over time, as, by removing the gating CD4 step from the HIV care cascade, more mothers will receive ART.2,10 It is important to perform HIV testing according to schedule, to keep a record of all specimens sent for PCR testing to the Central Laboratory in Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Blantyre, and to follow up on missing results. It would also be useful to conduct further research to ascertain the reasons for the high proportion of infants with missing HIV test results, and the reasons for loss to follow-up.

Acknowledgments

The authors are greatly indebted to all persons from Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) and from Thyolo District Hospital involved in collecting data in the field to make the preparation of this study possible.

This research was supported through an operational research course that was jointly developed and run by the Operational Research Unit (LUXOR), Médecins Sans Frontières, Brussels Operational Centre, Luxembourg; the Centre for Operational Research, International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union), Paris, France; and The Union South-East Asia Office, Delhi, India. Additional support for running the course was provided by the Institute for Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium; the Centre for International Health, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; the University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya, and Partners In Health, Rwanda. This course is under the umbrella of the World Health Organization (WHO-TDR) SORT IT (Structured Operational Research and Training Initiative) programme for capacity building in low- and middle-income countries.

Funding for the course was provided by MSF Luxembourg, Brussels Operational Centre, Luxembourg, the Bloomberg Philanthropies and the Department for International Development (DFID), UK. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: none declared.

References


Articles from Public Health Action are provided here courtesy of The International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease

RESOURCES