Abstract
Neuroblastoma is a childhood malignancy that has not yet benefitted from the rapid progress in development of small molecule therapeutics for cancer. An opportunity to take advantage of pharmaceutical innovation in this area arose when the identification of ALK fusion proteins in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) occurred in parallel to the discovery of point mutations of ALK in neuroblastomas. ALK is now known to be a marker of poor outcome in neuroblastoma and therefore urgent development of specific ALK inhibitors to treat this devastating disease is a necessity. However, the translation of small molecules from adult directly into pediatric practice has thus far been challenging, due to mutation specific structural variances in the ALK kinase domain. We discuss how the most recent structural and biological characterizations of ALK are directing preclinical and clinical studies of ALK inhibitors for both NSCLC and neuroblastoma.
Keywords: Neuroblastoma, ALK, therapeutics, preclinical, lung cancer
Introduction
The ALK gene is found on chromosome 2p23 and encodes a receptor tyrosine kinase originally identified in anaplastic large-cell lymphoma, where it occurs as an oncogenic fusion protein with nucleophosmin due to the chromosomal translocation t(2;5) (1). ALK protein consists of 1620 amino acids with an extracellular domain, a transmembrane sequence, and intracellular region containing juxtamembrane and kinase domains (2). ALK came into the limelight following the discovery that in roughly 5% of NSCLC, it exists as an oncoprotein, due to a translocation event that results in the fusion of the echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4) gene (3). In the childhood malignancy, neuroblastoma, for which the current treatment of intermediate and high-risk disease depends upon intensive multi-modal therapy, mutations of ALK can occur, allowing constitutive phosphorylation and activation of downstream signaling. The differential activity of each individual ALK mutant found in neuroblastoma impacts upon the sensitivity of this signaling pathway to structurally different ALK inhibitors (4). This strongly suggests that genomically stratified medicine will be crucial to improve the outcome of this subset of children with neuroblastoma.
Crizotinib resistance in NSCLC
The rapid FDA approval of the first-generation ALK inhibitor, crizotinib, for front-line treatment of ALK-positive NSCLC in 2011 was a milestone in the history of clinical development of small molecular inhibitors to treat cancer. However, resistance to crizotinib was anticipated, and between 2010 and 2013 no fewer than 40 patent applications were received for the next generation of ALK inhibitors. These have widely varying structural motifs and currently seven are in clinical trials for adult disease. Not necessarily anticipated, however, was the variety of mechanisms of drug resistance seen in relapsing patients (5). The first documented crizotinib resistance mutation in NSCLC is the “gatekeeper” mutation, L1196M (figure 1bi) (6). However there are multiple additional ALK mutations that can occur in response to crizotinib treatment together accounting for about 30% of the resistance cases seen in NSCLC (6,7). This large number of reported secondary mutations in the ALK kinase domain following crizotinib treatment poses a great challenge to those working in the drug discovery field, as it is apparent that no two mutations will result in the same sensitivity to a particular non-crizotinib ALK inhibitor. The work done by Ceccon et al (8) was among the first to illustrate this point through the use of ALK positive cell lines grown in increasing concentrations of crizotinib. Subsequently cells acquired either a substitution at L1196, which conferred resistance to crizotinib, but not to AP26113 and NVP-TAE694; or the neuroblastoma-associated I1171N mutation, which was resistant to all tested inhibitors.
Figure 1.

a. Illustrates the downstream signaling pathways of ALK and highlights where therapeutic inhibition may be possible, in combination with direct inhibitors of ALK.
b. Schematic diagram of the chemical structure of ALK. i. Arrows point to three mutation sites found in crizotinib-resistant NSCLC, including the gatekeeper residue L1196 and the G1202 mutation flanking the ATP-binding domain. ii. Illustrates the mutation “hotspots” identified in the pediatric malignancy neuroblastoma, all found at residues distant from the ATP-binding domain.
The neuroblastoma story
In 2008 a series of primary mutations in full-length ALK were identified in neuroblastoma, the pediatric malignancy that originates in the neural crest (9-12). It is now clear that three “hot spot” residues in the kinase domain account for 85% of mutations: R1275, F1174 and F1245, each of which render ALK constitutively activated (figure 1bii) (4). Substitutions at R1275 are oncogenic drivers in the majority of familial neuroblastomas and the results of the phase I study of crizotinib in pediatric patients suggests that these patients will benefit from treatment with this inhibitor (9-11,13). In contrast, the most predominant change in sporadic neuroblastoma, F1174L, defines relative resistance to crizotinib in the clinical setting (12,13). The largest cohort of neuroblastoma patients studied to date, has found that not only mutations of ALK, but also any ALK aberration, including copy number gain or amplification, are a marker of worse overall survival, underlining the urgent need to evaluate ALK inhibitors for the treatment of this group of patients (4). ALK mutations may also be acquired upon disease relapse, so it is anticipated that even more patients could potentially benefit from therapeutic ALK inhibition (14).
The most common somatic ALK mutation, F1174L, has been extensively characterized as a mutation that is transforming in vitro that (12), and that can accelerate development of neuroblastoma tumors in animal models, in conjunction with expression of the most common neuroblastoma genetic aberration, MYCN (15-17). Characterization of the signaling pathways activated downstream of ALK in neuroblastoma has shown that there is overlap with those described in the context of adult ALK tumors (Fig. 1a). Important mediators of cell proliferation and survival activated following ALK phosphorylation are the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK1/2/5 pathway, the JAK/STAT (Janus activated kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription) pathway, the PI3K(phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase)/Akt pathway and the PLC (phospholipase C)-γ pathway (figure 1a) (15,18,19).
Following the recognition that children with aberrations of both ALK and MYCN have an especially poor outcome, it became a priority to understand the nature of the synergism between these two oncoproteins. Both the zebrafish and the ALKF1174L;DBHiCre mouse models of neuroblastoma have shown that tumor development is either dependent upon, or greatly enhanced with co-expression of mycn (16,17). In vitro studies have also shown that constitutively activated ALK up-regulates the transcription of mycn (20). Our Th-ALKF1174L/MYCN transgenic model of high-risk neuroblastoma, conclusively provided the in vivo evidence of a cooperative relationship between MYCN and ALK, and further demonstrated the downstream signaling pathways activated due to an ALK mutation (15). It is essential to fully characterize the complex signaling pathways maintaining cellular proliferation in mutant ALK neuroblastoma, because if single-agent inhibition of ALK is insufficient to treat this disease, combinational therapeutic targeting can be explored.
Therapeutic inhibition of ALK to treat neuroblastoma
Efforts to produce next-generation ALK inhibitors have been directed towards designing molecules that target the EML4-ALK mutant variants found in crizotinib-resistant NSCLC, including the gatekeeper mutation, L1196M, whilst optimizing bioavailability. Designs that mimic the crizotinib-ALK binding elements are popular, whilst alternative compounds have been identified from high-throughput screens. Of particular note are the Novartis agent ceritinib, now FDA approved, and the Ariad agent AP26113, which has been granted FDA breakthrough therapy designation, for their success in treating both crizotinib naïve and crizotinib resistant patients with NSCLC (21,22). However, interrogation of crizotinib-resistant mutations in NSCLC has found that a small proportion of acquired mutations, including those at the F1174 residue, also exhibit resistance to ceritinib (23).
The first clinical trial of crizotinib in pediatric patients, whilst successful in demonstrating responses in a number of patients with tumors harboring ALK aberrations, suggested that ALK F1174L defined relative resistance to this inhibitor (13). The sensitivity of ALK F1174L to crizotinib inhibition is complex, as co-crystallization of this inhibitor within the ALK F1174L catalytic domain predicts an adequate fit to impinge upon access to the ATP binding site (24) and in vitro studies demonstrate that crizotinib can inhibit ALK F1174L, albeit at greater doses than required for the other neuroblastoma ALK mutants most likely due to the increased affinity of ALK F1174L for ATP (25,26).
A mutation at F1174 is particularly intriguing, as it results in quite a subtle change to the chemical structure of ALK yet has a significant biological effect. The F1174 residue lies at the C terminus of the αC helix within the hydrophobic spine of the kinase domain, but distinct from the ATP-binding domain (Fig. 1bii). This is in contrast to other multi-inhibitor resistant mutations, such as G1202R, which is found at the ATP-binding site (figure 1bi) (23). The F1174L mutation, which results in the replacement of the large phenylalanine side chain with a smaller leucine residue, changes the geometry of the αC helix and overall the kinase domain of ALK adopts a catalytically active conformation (27). Moreover, the switch to a smaller residue at F1174 is likely to have an impact on the ability of the neighboring DFG motif to coordinate a magnesium ion, which is essential for the kinase activity (26).
Steady-state kinetic parameters of wild type ALK and ALK F1174L were compared by Bresler et al. (26). They found that phosphorylation of the wild type protein leads to a 45-fold activation, and that unphosphorylated F1174L had 86% of the activity of the phosphorylated wild-type enzyme. This group went further to investigate the ability of neuroblastoma ALK mutants within the kinase domain to phosphorylate a peptide corresponding to the ALK activation loop, in order to predict the transforming ability of individual mutants (4). Mutations at the F1174 and the F1245 residues, both within the hydrophobic core, promoted the strongest activation of ALK coupled with the greatest transforming ability. Sensitivity or resistance to crizotinib correlated with IC50 values generated using transformation assays, rather than biochemical indices in several cases, suggesting that a thorough biological evaluation of next-generation inhibitors to target individual crizotinib-resistant ALK mutations will be required. Indeed, further experimental interrogation of the second-generation ALK inhibitor, ceritinib, has revealed that it was unable to inhibit ALK harboring the crizotinib-resistant F1174C mutation, which would structurally have a similar impact upon the kinase domain of ALK to F1174L (22).
The resistance of an F1174 mutation to two structurally diverse ALK inhibitors emphasizes the urgent need to evaluate alternative compounds, in order to treat patients with neuroblastoma who are resistant to currently available ALK inhibitors. There are seven ALK inhibitors in clinical use available to adult patients, including those with crizotinib resistant NSCLC (table one). This is in stark contrast to only two that are in clinical trials for pediatric patients. However, the recently reported potency of the Pfizer compound, PF6463922, against F1174L in vitro clearly suggests that it could show efficacy against F1174L in vivo and warrants further investigation (28). It is clear that tackling ALK resistance will require very careful molecularly personalized medicine, with transparent collaborations between pharmaceutical companies, academia and clinicians, to select the appropriate agent, or combinations, for the specific resistant mutation or mutations acquired.
Table 1.
The eight selective ALK inhibitors currently in clinical trials are shown alongside the data available to demonstrate their potency in cells expressing wild-type ALK and the most frequent ALK mutations found in NSCLC and neuroblastoma, L1196 and F1174 respectively. The corresponding IC50 in the same experiment for crizotinib is shown in brackets.
| Compound | Chemical Structure | IC50 of Compound in cells (nM) | Stage of clinical development | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALK | ALK L1196 | ALK F1174 | Ref. | Adults | Children | ||
| Crizotinib |
|
FDA approved | Phase I/II | ||||
| Ceritinib |
|
0.6 (19) | 7.5 (319) | 50 (100) | (23) | FDA approved | Phase I/II |
| AP26113 | Data not available | FDA breakthrough therapy designation | n/a | ||||
| Alectinib |
|
Data not available | Phase III | n/a | |||
| PF06463922 |
|
1.3 (80) | 0.7 (843) | 0.2 (165) | (28) | Phase I/II | n/a |
| X-396 | 22 (250) | 106 (1815) | 68 (338) | (30) | Phase I | n/a | |
| RXDX-101 | Data not available | Phase I/II | n/a | ||||
| TSR-011 | Data not available | Phase I/II | n/a | ||||
Preclinical models of neuroblastoma: predicting the most potent compounds for clinical use
Evaluation of next-generation ALK inhibitors to treat neuroblastoma using a rational methodology will allow selection of the most appropriate compounds to be taken forward into the clinic. To achieve this aim we have developed a transgenic model of neuroblastoma, where tyrosine hydroxylase drives expression of ALK F1174L and MYCN (Th-ALKF1174L/MYCN); serving as an invaluable platform for the evaluation of novel therapeutics (15). In this transgenic ALK F1174L expression upregulates the transcription of native Mycn, which further increases the relevance of the model to clinical cases of neuroblastoma. Transgenic models are superior to human xenograft models for translational pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling due to spontaneous tumor onset in an immunologically competent animal, which allows the study of a comparable tumor microenvironment to the human disease equivalent. Indeed, through Th-ALKF1174L/MYCN we were able to predict that neuroblastomas harboring ALK F1174L would not respond to crizotinib treatment in the clinic (13).
Despite the on-going efforts to bring next-generation ALK inhibitors into clinical practice, it may be that some crizotinib-resistant mutants will require a combinational therapeutic approach to achieve tumor response. We have already demonstrated tumor regression in Th-ALKF1174L/MYCN model when crizotinib is combined with the mTOR inhibitor, Torin2 (15). As a direct result of this preclinical study the combination is now being pursued clinically in pediatrics, with a trial planned to include crizotinib combined with temsirolimus, an agent known to be well-tolerated in the combinational therapeutic setting. Further potential for combinational drug therapy to overcome crizotinib resistance in dual ALK-positive, MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma might include crizotinib with an ERK5 inhibitor, as ALK-induced transcription of MYCN and subsequent stimulation of cell proliferation requires signaling through this pathway (19).
Conclusion
Resistance to crizotinib whether acquired, as in NSCLC, or intrinsic, as in neuroblastoma, requires a complex clinical strategy due to the wide range of resistance mechanisms. Preclinical models of neuroblastoma in which there is targeted expression of a resistant ALK mutation have a crucial role to play in the development of next-generation ALK inhibitors. Their relevance is not only towards the pediatric population, as results generated with novel compounds could provide rationale for the treatment of adult patients with multi-drug resistant ALK mutations.
Traditionally, successful drug development requires that a large volume of patients be treated to see a small effect. As genomically-personalized medicine becomes a reality, developing drugs to treat specific molecular aberrations, a small population is targeted but the benefit will be of greater magnitude (29). This is especially poignant for pediatric drug development, as the comparative rarity of childhood cancer to adult malignancies suggests that pharmaceutical companies will not be incentivized to concentrate funding in this area. However, we believe in this case that a deeper understanding of the biology of ALK mutants seen in neuroblastoma will aid the development of ALK inhibitors to treat both adult and pediatric disease.
Acknowledgments
Financial Support
E.R Tucker is supported by a Medical Research Council/SPARKS Clinical Research Training Fellowship
L.S. Danielson is supported by a Neuroblastoma Society Project Grant
L Chesler is supported by a Cancer Research UK Project Grant and a Neuroblastoma Society Project Grant
Footnotes
Conflicts of Interest: none
References
- 1.Morris SW, Naeve C, Mathew P, James PL, Kirstein MN, Cui X, et al. ALK, the chromosome 2 gene locus altered by the t(2;5) in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, encodes a novel neural receptor tyrosine kinase that is highly related to leukocyte tyrosine kinase (LTK) Oncogene. 1997;14(18):2175–88. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1201062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Morris SW, Kirstein MN, Valentine MB, Dittmer KG, Shapiro DN, Saltman DL, et al. Fusion of a kinase gene, ALK, to a nucleolar protein gene, NPM, in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Science. 1994;263(5151):1281–4. doi: 10.1126/science.8122112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Soda M, Choi YL, Enomoto M, Takada S, Yamashita Y, Ishikawa S, et al. Identification of the transforming EML4-ALK fusion gene in non-small-cell lung cancer. Nature. 2007;448(7153):561–6. doi: 10.1038/nature05945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bresler SC, Weiser DA, Huwe PJ, Park JH, Krytska K, Ryles H, et al. ALK Mutations Confer Differential Oncogenic Activation and Sensitivity to ALK Inhibition Therapy in Neuroblastoma. Cancer cell. 2014;26(5):682–94. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2014.09.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Katayama R, Shaw AT, Khan TM, Mino-Kenudson M, Solomon BJ, Halmos B, et al. Mechanisms of acquired crizotinib resistance in ALK-rearranged lung Cancers. Science translational medicine. 2012;4(120):120ra17. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Choi YL, Soda M, Yamashita Y, Ueno T, Takashima J, Nakajima T, et al. EML4-ALK mutations in lung cancer that confer resistance to ALK inhibitors. The New England journal of medicine. 2010;363(18):1734–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1007478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yu HA, Arcila ME, Rekhtman N, Sima CS, Zakowski MF, Pao W, et al. Analysis of tumor specimens at the time of acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI therapy in 155 patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(8):2240–7. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ceccon M, Mologni L, Bisson W, Scapozza L, Gambacorti-Passerini C. Crizotinib-resistant NPM-ALK mutants confer differential sensitivity to unrelated Alk inhibitors. Molecular cancer research : MCR. 2013;11(2):122–32. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-12-0569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mosse YP, Laudenslager M, Longo L, Cole KA, Wood A, Attiyeh EF, et al. Identification of ALK as a major familial neuroblastoma predisposition gene. Nature. 2008;455(7215):930–5. doi: 10.1038/nature07261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Janoueix-Lerosey I, Lequin D, Brugieres L, Ribeiro A, de Pontual L, Combaret V, et al. Somatic and germline activating mutations of the ALK kinase receptor in neuroblastoma. Nature. 2008;455(7215):967–70. doi: 10.1038/nature07398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chen Y, Takita J, Choi YL, Kato M, Ohira M, Sanada M, et al. Oncogenic mutations of ALK kinase in neuroblastoma. Nature. 2008;455(7215):971–4. doi: 10.1038/nature07399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.George RE, Sanda T, Hanna M, Frohling S, Luther W, 2nd, Zhang J, et al. Activating mutations in ALK provide a therapeutic target in neuroblastoma. Nature. 2008;455(7215):975–8. doi: 10.1038/nature07397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mosse YP, Lim MS, Voss SD, Wilner K, Ruffner K, Laliberte J, et al. Safety and activity of crizotinib for paediatric patients with refractory solid tumours or anaplastic large-cell lymphoma: a Children’s Oncology Group phase 1 consortium study. The lancet oncology. 2013;14(6):472–80. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70095-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Schleiermacher G, Javanmardi N, Bernard V, Leroy Q, Cappo J, Rio Frio T, et al. Emergence of new ALK mutations at relapse of neuroblastoma. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2014;32(25):2727–34. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.0674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Berry T, Luther W, Bhatnagar N, Jamin Y, Poon E, Sanda T, et al. The ALK(F1174L) mutation potentiates the oncogenic activity of MYCN in neuroblastoma. Cancer cell. 2012;22(1):117–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Heukamp LC, Thor T, Schramm A, De Preter K, Kumps C, De Wilde B, et al. Targeted Expression of Mutated ALK Induces Neuroblastoma in Transgenic Mice. Science translational medicine. 2012;4(141):141ra91. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhu S, Lee JS, Guo F, Shin J, Perez-Atayde AR, Kutok JL, et al. Activated ALK collaborates with MYCN in neuroblastoma pathogenesis. Cancer cell. 2012;21(3):362–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.02.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sattu K, Hochgrafe F, Wu J, Umapathy G, Schonherr C, Ruuth K, et al. Phosphoproteomic analysis of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) downstream signaling pathways identifies signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 as a functional target of activated ALK in neuroblastoma cells. The FEBS journal. 2013;280(21):5269–82. doi: 10.1111/febs.12453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Umapathy G, El Wakil A, Witek B, Chesler L, Danielson L, Deng X, et al. The kinase ALK stimulates the kinase ERK5 to promote the expression of the oncogene MYCN in neuroblastoma. Science signaling. 2014;7(349):ra102. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2005470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Schonherr C, Ruuth K, Kamaraj S, Wang CL, Yang HL, Combaret V, et al. Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) regulates initiation of transcription of MYCN in neuroblastoma cells. Oncogene. 2012 doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Marsilje TH, Pei W, Chen B, Lu W, Uno T, Jin Y, et al. Synthesis, Structure-Activity Relationships, and in Vivo Efficacy of the Novel Potent and Selective Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Inhibitor 5-Chloro-N2-(2-isopropoxy-5-methyl-4-(piperidin-4-yl)phenyl)-N4-(2-(isopropylsulf onyl)phenyl)pyrimidine-2,4-diamine (LDK378) Currently in Phase 1 and Phase 2 Clinical Trials. Journal of medicinal chemistry. 2013;56(14):5675–90. doi: 10.1021/jm400402q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mehra R, Camidge D, Sharma S, Felip E, Tan D, Vansteenkiste J. First-in-human phase 1 study of the ALK inhibitor LDK378 in ALK+ solid tumours. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2012;30 [Google Scholar]
- 23.Friboulet L, Li N, Katayama R, Lee CC, Gainor JF, Crystal AS, et al. The ALK inhibitor ceritinib overcomes crizotinib resistance in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer discovery. 2014;4(6):662–73. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bossi RT, Saccardo MB, Ardini E, Menichincheri M, Rusconi L, Magnaghi P, et al. Crystal structures of anaplastic lymphoma kinase in complex with ATP competitive inhibitors. Biochemistry. 2010;49(32):6813–25. doi: 10.1021/bi1005514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Schonherr C, Ruuth K, Yamazaki Y, Eriksson T, Christensen J, Palmer RH, et al. Activating ALK mutations found in neuroblastoma are inhibited by Crizotinib and NVP-TAE684. Biochem J. 2011 doi: 10.1042/BJ20101796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bresler SC, Wood AC, Haglund EA, Courtright J, Belcastro LT, Plegaria JS, et al. Differential inhibitor sensitivity of anaplastic lymphoma kinase variants found in neuroblastoma. Science translational medicine. 2011;3(108):108ra14. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lee CC, Jia Y, Li N, Sun X, Ng K, Ambing E, et al. Crystal structure of the ALK (anaplastic lymphoma kinase) catalytic domain. Biochem J. 2010;430(3):425–37. doi: 10.1042/BJ20100609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Johnson TW, Richardson PF, Bailey S, Brooun A, Burke BJ, Collins MR, et al. Discovery of (10R)-7-amino-12-fluoro-2,10,16-trimethyl-15-oxo-10,15,16,17-tetrahydro-2H-8,4-(m etheno)pyrazolo[4,3-h][2,5,11]-benzoxadiazacyclotetradecine-3-carbonitrile (PF-06463922), a macrocyclic inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) with preclinical brain exposure and broad-spectrum potency against ALK-resistant mutations. Journal of medicinal chemistry. 2014;57(11):4720–44. doi: 10.1021/jm500261q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Moreno L, Pearson AD. How can attrition rates be reduced in cancer drug discovery? Expert opinion on drug discovery. 2013;8(4):363–8. doi: 10.1517/17460441.2013.768984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lovly CM, Heuckmann JM, de Stanchina E, Chen H, Thomas RK, Liang C, et al. Insights into ALK-driven cancers revealed through development of novel ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Cancer Res. 2011;71(14):4920–31. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
