Skip to main content
HHS Author Manuscripts logoLink to HHS Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 17.
Published in final edited form as: Chem Res Toxicol. 2015 Jul 30;28(8):1616–1626. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5b00190

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in the Mainstream Smoke of Popular U.S. Cigarettes

An T Vu , Kenneth M Taylor †,*, Matthew R Holman , Yan S Ding , Bryan Hearn , Clifford H Watson
PMCID: PMC4540633  NIHMSID: NIHMS710937  PMID: 26158771

Abstract

The mainstream smoke yields of 14 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were determined for 50 commercial U.S. cigarettes using a validated GC/MS method with the International Organization of Standardization (ISO) and Canadian Intense (CI) smoking machine regimens. PAH mainstream smoke deliveries vary widely among the commercial cigarettes with the ISO smoking regimen primarily because of differing filter ventilation. The more abundant, lower molecular weight PAHs such as naphthalene, fluorene, and phenanthrene predominantly comprise the total PAH yields. In contrast, delivery yields of high molecular weight PAHs such as benzo[b]fluoranthene, benzo[e]pyrene, benzo[k]fluoranthene, and benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) are much lower. Comparative analysis of PAHs deliveries shows brand specific differences. Correlation analysis shows strong positive associations between BaP and most of the other PAHs as well as total PAHs. The results suggest that BaP may be a representative marker for other PAH constituents in cigarette smoke generated from similarly blended tobacco, particularly those PAHs with similar molecular weights and chemical structures.

Keywords: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, benzo[a]pyrene, PAH correlations, mainstream cigarette smoke

INTRODUCTION

Tobacco use continues to be the leading cause of preventable death, accounting for approximately six million mortalities and more than one-half trillion dollars of economic damage worldwide each year.1 In the United States, cigarette smoking alone causes nearly one-half million adults to die prematurely each year.2 Cigarette smoke is an extremely complex chemical composition and contains numerous toxic and carcinogenic substances, including many polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). PAHs are a class of compounds composed of two or more fused benzenoid rings known for their carcinogenic and mutagenic properties. There are more than five hundred different PAHs in tobacco smoke.3 According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), some of the PAHs are possible or known human carcinogens.4 The IARC lists benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) as a Group 1 carcinogen, classifying it as the most potent carcinogen among the PAHs.4 Its induction of lung tumors upon local administration or inhalation is well documented.5

PAHs do not naturally occur in the tobacco plant, but are formed primarily by incomplete combustion of tobacco and other organic components during smoking. PAHs are present in some unburned tobacco products, particularly those containing fire-cured tobacco varieties.67 During fire curing, PAHs in combustion fumes generated by smoldering wood are deposited on the tobacco leaves.8

In 2012, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) identified and published a list of 93 harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs) in tobacco products and tobacco smoke in the Federal Register.9 Sixteen of these compounds are PAHs. The FDA requires tobacco product manufacturers to test and report the quantities of HPHCs, including BaP, in several tobacco matrices.10 In this study, we report the levels of 14 PAHs in the mainstream smoke of 50 commercial U.S. cigarette products under non-intense and intense smoking machine regimens using a validated gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) analytical method. We also examined potential correlations between BaP and other individual PAHs to determine if BaP may be an appropriate surrogate for other PAHs in cigarette smoke, including some of those that FDA has listed as HPHCs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials

The cigarettes selected for this study consisted of 35 top-selling U.S. cigarette brands that represented approximately 54 percent of the total U.S. cigarette market share based on sales volume.11 An additional 15 cigarettes were randomly selected to include some off-brands with low market share or unique characteristics. The 50 cigarettes consisted of 23 brands with various sub-brands, lengths (king or 100s), sizes (regular, slim, or super slim) and package types (hard pack or soft pack). They were regular, menthol, or Turkish flavored, and all contained a cellulose acetate filter. Most cigarette products (48) were produced by three major tobacco product manufacturers, R. J. Reynolds, Philip Morris, and Lorillard. American Spirit Blue King was manufactured by Natural American Spirit, and USA Gold 100s was manufactured by Commonwealth Brands. All cigarettes were purchased in November 2011 from retail outlets in the greater metropolitan Atlanta area in Georgia, USA. The cigarette packs were assigned unique identification numbers, and logged into a database. Samples were stored at −80 °C in their original packaging until needed. The 3R4F reference cigarettes were obtained from the University of Kentucky, Kentucky Tobacco Research and Development Center (Lexington, KY).

Neat PAHs used for calibration were obtained from Aldrich Chemical Co. (Milwaukee, WI). A 14-PAH standard (13C, 99%, 5 µg/mL) stock, used as a labeled internal standard, was purchased from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc. (Andover, MA). All dilutions were prepared in methanol. Cambridge filter pads (CFPs) used to collect mainstream smoke particulate matter were obtained from Whatman (Maidstone, United Kingdom).

Smoke Particulate Matter Collection

Cigarettes and CFPs were conditioned at 22 °C and 60% relative humidity for at least 48 h prior to smoking according to the International Organization of Standardization (ISO) method 3402.12 Mainstream smoke total particulate matter (TPM) was generated by following the ISO smoking regimen (60-s puff interval, 2-s puff duration, and 35-mL puff volume, unblocked ventilation),13 or Canadian Intense (CI) smoking regimen (30-s puff interval, 2-s puff duration, and 55-mL puff volume, 100% blocked ventilation)14 and were collected on individual CFPs using a Cerulean ASM500 16-port smoking machine (Milton Keynes, United Kingdom). The cigarettes were smoked to a butt length of 23 mm or to the length of the filter overwrap plus 3 mm, whichever was longer. Three cigarettes were smoked per CFP for the ISO regimen, and one cigarette was smoked per CFP for the CI regimen. Cigarettes were smoked to obtain the average smoke particulate level for each of the 14 PAHs measured in this study (Figure 1). During each smoking run, 3R4F cigarettes were smoked as quality control (QC) samples. After a group of cigarettes were smoked, each CFP was spiked with 20 µL of the 13C PAH internal standard solution prior to sample preparation and cleanup.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Chemical structure, molecular weight, and boiling point of 14 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon analytes.

Sample Preparation and GC/MS Analysis

The sample preparation and GC/MS analysis scheme was based on a method previously developed and validated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),15 modified to use a Gilson 215 automated solid phase extraction (SPE) system (Middleton, WI) and Varian C-18 SPEC cartridges (Lake Forest, CA).16 An Agilent GC model 6890 and an Agilent single quadruple MS model 5973 were used for analysis with Chem Station software for data acquisition in selected ion monitoring mode (SIM). Reconstructed ion chromatograms used for quantification were processed using Xcalibur software (Thermo Electron), and results were exported to an Excel spreadsheet. Each quantitation ion peak area was automatically selected and integrated. Integrations were manually inspected for errors and reintegrated if needed. Individual levels of the 14 PAHs were calculated from the means of seven replicates and reported as ng analyte per cigarette (Tables 12).

Table 1.

PAH Levels in Mainstream Smoke of 50 Commercial U.S. Cigarette Products Measured by ISO Smoking Regimen

cigarette producta PAHb (ng/cigarette)

NAP ACL ACT FLU ANT PHE FLR PYR BAA CHR BBF BEP BKF BAP total PAHc
American Spirit Blue King HP 804 ± 186 272 ± 88 52 ± 5.4 534 ± 66 158 ± 37 431 ± 39 119 ± 15 70 ± 13 39 ± 4.4 61 ± 6.8 22 ± 1.3 11 ± 1.2 3.7 ± 0.3 22 ± 0.8 2599 ± 224
Winston Red 100s HP 774 ± 60 210 ± 36 34 ± 11 321 ± 54 91 ± 20 288 ± 45 103 ± 23 60 ± 14 29 ± 1.4 44 ± 3.2 20 ± 1.3 13 ± 1.1 3.6 ± 0.3 17 ± 0.9 2006 ± 105
Winston Red King HP 518 ± 41 235 ± 28 48 ± 6.3 401 ± 33 92 ± 16 288 ± 18 102 ± 25 60 ± 9.4 27 ± 1.0 42 ± 2.6 20 ± 1.6 10 ± 0.9 3.8 ± 0.5 16 ± 1.0 1862 ± 70
Kool Green King Menthol SP 467 ± 51 201 ± 33 35 ± 5.7 308 ± 26 85 ± 17 265 ± 19 89 ± 16 52 ± 3.7 26 ± 2.9 38 ± 5.5 20 ± 1.4 10 ± 1.5 3.6 ± 0.5 16 ± 1.6 1615 ± 73
Kool Green King Menthol HP 474 ± 61 188 ± 19 39 ± 5.0 297 ± 29 85 ± 16 260 ± 22 85 ± 11 54 ± 10 25 ± 1.7 38 ± 2.4 19 ± 1.3 8.6 ± 0.6 3.6 ± 0.3 15 ± 0.6 1591 ± 77
Camel Filters King Turkish HP 443 ± 62 198 ± 42 40 ± 6.2 289 ± 26 75 ± 12 244 ± 32 82 ± 6.4 60 ± 6.3 25 ± 2.1 38 ± 3.7 19 ± 1.8 8.9 ± 1.3 3.5 ± 0.6 16 ± 1.6 1540 ± 88
Winston Gold King HP 398 ± 34 189 ± 40 43 ± 5.0 298 ± 32 77 ± 20 235 ± 22 87 ± 12 47 ± 5.8 22 ± 1.4 33 ± 1.6 16 ± 0.8 7.6 ± 0.4 2.8 ± 0.1 12 ± 0.6 1468 ± 70
Pall Mall Blue King HP 320 ± 31 176 ± 21 40 ± 5.3 245 ± 23 76 ± 11 237 ± 21 87 ± 12 56 ± 8.9 24 ± 1.8 38 ± 2.9 18 ± 1.4 8.7 ± 0.7 3.7 ± 0.3 14 ± 0.8 1343 ± 53
Marlboro Gold 100s HP 509 ± 87 159 ± 26 24 ± 6.4 212 ± 36 59 ± 11 178 ± 24 67 ± 7.4 42 ± 6.6 18 ± 1.3 28 ± 3.7 11 ± 0.8 6.6 ± 0.8 1.9 ± 0.4 10 ± 0.7 1325 ± 102
Salem Green King Menthol HP 420 ± 50 161 ± 20 21 ± 2.6 242 ± 22 65 ± 7.9 196 ± 19 79 ± 7.8 45 ± 3.8 22 ± 2.2 33 ± 4.6 13 ± 1.5 11 ± 2.6 2.8 ± 0.7 12 ± 2.0 1322 ± 63
Vantage Multi Color King SP 448 ± 41 159 ± 25 20 ± 2.6 204 ± 19 63 ± 7.8 186 ± 16 76 ± 12 48 ± 3.9 22 ± 2.9 30 ± 4.4 14 ± 2.0 12 ± 2.0 3.2 ± 0.5 13 ± 2.5 1297 ± 57
USA Gold 100s Menthol SP 474 ± 124 159 ± 30 26 ± 8.9 218 ± 49 68 ± 15 168 ± 23 67 ± 6.2 39 ± 5.0 15 ± 1.8 24 ± 2.6 11 ± 0.8 7.3 ± 0.5 1.9 ± 0.4 9.3 ± 1.0 1287 ± 140
Newport Green King Menthol SP 374 ± 63 147 ± 11 29 ± 5.0 225 ± 21 66 ± 9.0 175 ± 13 74 ± 5.3 47 ± 4.4 18 ± 1.5 28 ± 2.8 16 ± 1.1 7.9 ± 0.9 3.2 ± 0.3 12 ± 1.0 1222 ± 70
Marlboro Red King HP 444 ± 91 119 ± 24 29 ± 5.7 223 ± 49 75 ± 13 138 ± 34 55 ± 7.6 49 ± 10 21 ± 2.8 30 ± 3.3 13 ± 1.7 6.2 ± 0.8 2.4 ± 0.3 11 ± 1.2 1216 ± 113
Marlboro Red 100s SP 396 ± 39 130 ± 19 26 ± 5.6 249 ± 25 84 ± 10 137 ± 35 61 ± 7.7 53 ± 16 19 ± 0.8 29 ± 1.9 13 ± 0.9 5.8 ± 0.3 2.3 ± 0.2 11 ± 0.7 1216 ± 64
Marlboro Red 100s HP 365 ± 38 121 ± 16 25 ± 3.2 232 ± 32 74 ± 14 159 ± 38 55 ± 8.7 50 ± 8.0 20 ± 1.5 31 ± 3.4 14 ± 1.0 6.1 ± 1.0 2.4 ± 0.2 11 ± 1.8 1164 ± 67
Salem Gold King Menthol HP 329 ± 60 161 ± 33 35 ± 1.3 208 ± 12 59 ± 7.3 177 ± 15 73 ± 8.7 45 ± 8.8 17 ± 1.7 25 ± 1.8 13 ± 1.4 5.9 ± 0.8 2.4 ± 0.2 10 ± 1.0 1160 ± 73
Camel Blue King Turkish HP 306 ± 59 163 ± 23 34 ± 2.4 203 ± 22 64 ± 8.2 181 ± 17 70 ± 7.6 48 ± 8.2 19 ± 2.5 28 ± 3.3 15 ± 1.8 7.0 ± 1.1 2.8 ± 0.5 12 ± 1.5 1152 ± 71
Marlboro Red King SP 391 ± 71 115 ± 18 26 ± 3.7 214 ± 23 79 ± 9.2 136 ± 32 53 ± 2.7 45 ± 10 19 ± 1.1 29 ± 1.7 13 ± 0.8 5.6 ± 0.4 2.2 ± 0.1 11 ± 0.9 1137 ± 85
Maverick Gold 100s HP 378 ± 63 145 ± 18 21 ± 6.1 185 ± 43 55 ± 6.4 154 ± 20 66 ± 4.6 41 ± 6.8 17 ± 2.2 26 ± 4.2 13 ± 1.5 8.4 ± 0.7 2.0 ± 0.3 10 ± 1.6 1121 ± 82
Basic Gold 100s SP 383 ± 57 135 ± 18 21 ± 5.0 187 ± 36 58 ± 11 161 ± 21 60 ± 7.4 41 ± 3.5 17 ± 0.9 25 ± 2.0 11 ± 0.8 7.5 ± 0.7 2.0 ± 0.2 11 ± 0.8 1120 ± 74
Doral Gold King HP 375 ± 44 133 ± 12 17 ± 1.4 159 ± 12 56 ± 6.4 161 ± 12 75 ± 7.7 50 ± 7.0 19 ± 0.8 28 ± 1.6 14 ± 0.8 12 ± 0.8 3.2 ± 0.5 12 ± 0.9 1113 ± 50
Parliament Blue King HP 458 ± 55 132 ± 17 19 ± 4.4 165 ± 26 53 ± 12 144 ± 28 51 ± 6.4 35 ± 5.1 13 ± 1.5 20 ± 3.1 8.5 ± 1.5 5.5 ± 1.1 1.3 ± 0.4 7.5 ± 1.3 1113 ± 70
Benson & Hedges Green 100s Menthol HP 288 ± 61 146 ± 25 19 ± 2.8 204 ± 24 60 ± 11 175 ± 21 74 ± 10 45 ± 4.9 20 ± 2.3 30 ± 2.6 12 ± 1.4 10 ± 1.5 2.4 ± 0.5 12 ± 1.3 1098 ± 75
Basic Gold 100s HP 389 ± 66 141 ± 23 19 ± 4.9 172 ± 20 51 ± 7.1 150 ± 23 58 ± 6.5 41 ± 3.8 15 ± 1.4 23 ± 2.9 11 ± 1.1 7.2 ± 0.6 1.9 ± 0.3 10 ± 0.8 1089 ± 77
Benson & Hedges Luxury Gold 100s SP 245 ± 57 138 ± 18 29 ± 3.9 197 ± 14 61 ± 11 177 ± 16 66 ± 6.7 45 ± 5.6 18 ± 1.4 28 ± 1.8 12 ± 0.9 5.9 ± 0.8 2.2 ± 0.3 10 ± 1.2 1035 ± 65
Marlboro Red Label King HP 358 ± 40 129 ± 32 22 ± 4.0 189 ± 23 66 ± 10 112 ± 28 49 ± 4.4 43 ± 9.4 15 ± 2.0 23 ± 3.1 11 ± 1.4 4.8 ± 0.6 1.9 ± 0.3 9.2 ± 1.4 1032 ± 65
Misty Blue Slims HP 298 ± 67 130 ± 26 19 ± 6.4 171 ± 26 56 ± 5.2 165 ± 22 66 ± 6.3 44 ± 6.0 17 ± 2.5 28 ± 4.0 13 ± 1.7 8.5 ± 2.0 2.5 ± 0.9 11 ± 2.0 1027 ± 80
Newport Green 100s Menthol HP 210 ± 36 117 ± 13 28 ± 3.8 210 ± 37 80 ± 7.4 148 ± 36 66 ± 6.3 55 ± 14 21 ± 0.9 33 ± 1.2 18 ± 0.4 7.9 ± 0.3 3.5 ± 0.1 13 ± 0.7 1010 ± 66
Marlboro Green King Menthol HP 240 ± 32 108 ± 12 28 ± 6.1 229 ± 45 80 ± 10 139 ± 23 54 ± 7.6 49 ± 6.3 19 ± 1.2 28 ± 2.4 13 ± 1.1 5.7 ± 0.7 2.5 ± 0.5 11 ± 1.0 1005 ± 63
Kent Golden King SP 382 ± 66 130 ± 18 19 ± 3.9 150 ± 26 45 ± 7.4 120 ± 22 51 ± 2.8 33 ± 5.1 11 ± 1.6 18 ± 2.8 8.8 ± 1.2 6.0 ± 0.6 1.5 ± 0.2 6.9 ± 0.8 981 ± 77
Merit Gold King SP 337 ± 65 131 ± 17 17 ± 5.7 150 ± 25 52 ± 7.5 145 ± 25 49 ± 6.4 34 ± 6.0 14 ± 2.7 20 ± 4.0 8.6 ± 1.3 5.4 ± 1.0 1.4 ± 0.4 8.1 ± 2.2 974 ± 77
Winston White 100s HP 328 ± 79 130 ± 32 19 ± 5.1 159 ± 29 51 ± 8.7 140 ± 28 49 ± 5.7 33 ± 4.0 12 ± 1.9 19 ± 3.8 8.3 ± 1.5 5.5 ± 1.0 1.6 ± 0.4 7.2 ± 1.1 963 ± 95
Newport Green King Menthol HP 226 ± 40 121 ± 14 29 ± 7.1 199 ± 31 71 ± 8.8 127 ± 19 58 ± 4.0 45 ± 4.6 18 ± 1.7 28 ± 3.1 15 ± 1.7 6.6 ± 0.7 3.0 ± 0.3 11 ± 1.5 958 ± 57
Capri Magenta Super Slims HP 275 ± 42 133 ± 21 31 ± 4.1 186 ± 13 46 ± 8.2 135 ± 17 52 ± 4.4 34 ± 5.4 12 ± 0.9 18 ± 1.7 9.2 ± 0.8 4.4 ± 0.7 1.7 ± 0.2 6.9 ± 0.5 944 ± 53
Marlboro Gold King HP 304 ± 34 101 ± 15 24 ± 4.2 177 ± 14 53 ± 6.2 105 ± 18 43 ± 2.0 39 ± 5.9 14 ± 1.2 22 ± 2.1 10 ± 1.0 4.4 ± 0.5 1.8 ± 0.2 8.3 ± 0.8 920 ± 60
Salem Gold 100s Menthol HP 200 ± 21 117 ± 17 34 ± 2.6 181 ± 17 53 ± 9.3 155 ± 14 63 ± 4.4 40 ± 6.3 16 ± 0.9 24 ± 1.6 11 ± 0.9 5.7 ± 0.7 2.1 ± 0.3 9.2 ± 0.9 910 ± 37
Marlboro Gold King SP 297 ± 54 101 ± 12 25 ± 2.4 183 ± 13 62 ± 6.6 106 ± 16 45 ± 4.4 38 ± 6.7 15 ± 0.9 23 ± 2.0 10 ± 0.8 4.5 ± 0.3 1.8 ± 0.2 8.5 ± 0.5 905 ± 45
Virginia Slims Gold HP 281 ± 53 116 ± 18 18 ± 4.9 144 ± 19 47 ± 7.3 124 ± 22 50 ± 6.2 34 ± 2.3 12 ± 2.5 19 ± 3.6 8.1 ± 1.4 5.6 ± 1.3 1.3 ± 0.3 7.2 ± 1.2 866 ± 64
Marlboro Gold King Menthol HP 221 ± 74 92 ± 13 25 ± 2.1 187 ± 33 59 ± 8.8 108 ± 26 46 ± 4.6 38 ± 8.2 15 ± 0.8 23 ± 2.3 10 ± 0.7 4.7 ± 0.5 1.8 ± 0.1 8.6 ± 0.6 839 ± 87
Basic Green 100s Menthol HP 207 ± 21 106 ± 11 15 ± 1.6 142 ± 8.0 49 ± 6.2 139 ± 12 60 ± 6.0 35 ± 4.6 16 ± 1.1 23 ± 3.2 10 ± 0.3 8.4 ± 0.4 2.3 ± 0.4 10 ± 0.9 822 ± 30
Marlboro Gold 100s SP 220 ± 23 84 ± 11 23 ± 1.9 162 ± 24 55 ± 9.0 102 ± 24 39 ± 3.2 36 ± 4.9 13 ± 0.5 20 ± 1.1 8.8 ± 0.3 3.9 ± 0.1 1.6 ± 0.04 7.6 ± 0.4 776 ± 44
True Silver King SP 173 ± 21 116 ± 22 27 ± 3.0 124 ± 18 34 ± 4.6 98 ± 12 44 ± 6.7 28 ± 4.5 10 ± 1.4 16 ± 2.4 7.6 ± 0.9 3.6 ± 0.5 1.6 ± 0.2 5.8 ± 0.8 687 ± 39
Doral Silver 100s HP 142 ± 18 83 ± 16 12 ± 4.1 110 ± 12 42 ± 6.1 114 ± 17 52 ± 6.3 36 ± 5.9 13 ± 1.5 21 ± 2.6 10 ± 1.1 6.2 ± 0.7 1.8 ± 0.2 7.8 ± 1.9 650 ± 34
Salem Silver 100s Menthol HP 147 ± 54 83 ± 20 14 ± 3.2 123 ± 14 38 ± 4.7 106 ± 14 46 ± 5.6 33 ± 5.6 11 ± 1.8 17 ± 3.0 7.3 ± 0.7 4.8 ± 0.8 1.3 ± 0.3 6.4 ± 1.3 638 ± 62
Basic Blue 100s HP 117 ± 12 84 ± 13 12 ± 1.7 101 ± 10 41 ± 4.3 102 ± 8.1 40 ± 4.5 28 ± 3.8 12 ± 1.6 17 ± 2.6 6.7 ± 0.7 5.7 ± 0.8 1.6 ± 0.1 6.3 ± 1.3 572 ± 23
Marlboro Silver King HP 153 ± 25 64 ± 8.6 19 ± 2.3 114 ± 9.3 40 ± 4.6 74 ± 8.3 32 ± 2.7 25 ± 2.8 10 ± 0.7 15 ± 1.2 6.7 ± 0.5 3.0 ± 0.3 1.2 ± 0.1 5.6 ± 0.5 563 ± 30
Marlboro Silver 100s HP 108 ± 27 56 ± 7.8 17 ± 1.8 107 ± 10 39 ± 5.9 75 ± 13 28 ± 2.8 24 ± 2.3 9.2 ± 0.6 14 ± 0.9 6.0 ± 0.3 2.8 ± 0.2 1.1 ± 0.1 5.2 ± 0.4 492 ± 33
NOW Gold 100s SP 62 ± 20 57 ± 13 8.0 ± 1.3 58 ± 9.2 24 ± 2.8 61 ± 7.9 25 ± 5.0 17 ± 2.3 6.2 ± 1.3 8.4 ± 1.0 3.7 ± 0.4 2.4 ± 0.9 1.2 ± 0.1 3.3 ± 1.3 336 ± 27
Carlton White 100s HP 14 ± 1.9 23 ± 2.4 3.8 ± 0.4 24 ± 3.3 12 ± 1.0 28 ± 2.2 12 ± 1.3 8.1 ± 0.9 3.7 ± 0.1 4.5 ± 0.3 1.9 ± 0.3 1.2 ± 0.5 0.7 ± 0.2 2.1 ± 1.0 139 ± 5
Mean 329 ± 59 133 ± 25 25 ± 4.6 199 ± 28 62 ± 11 159 ± 23 61 ± 8.6 42 ± 7.1 17 ± 1.8 26 ± 3.0 12 ± 1.2 6.7 ± 1.0 2.3 ± 0.3 10 ± 1.2 1084 ± 76
3R4Fd 287 ± 36 80 ± 7.6 19 ± 3.3 153 ± 18 51 ± 5.2 117 ± 15 42 ± 4.7 32 ± 3.3 13 ± 1.4 17 ± 1.8 8.3 ± 1.0 4.0 ± 0.4 1.6 ± 0.3 7.0 ± 0.8 833 ± 45
a

Cigarettes are sorted by total PAH quantity. Cigarette description abbreviations: HP, hard pack; SP, soft pack; King, king size (approximately 84 mm cigarette length); 100s, 100mm cigarette length.

b

See Figure 1 for PAH abbreviations. PAH constituents are sorted by molecular weight followed by boiling point. Individual PAH quantities were determined from 7 replicates.

c

Sum of quantities of the 14 individual PAHs.

d

PAH values are average of 25 replicates.

Table 2.

PAH Levels in Mainstream Smoke of 50 Commercial U.S. Cigarette Products Measured by CI Smoking Regimen

cigarette productsa PAHb (ng/cigarette)

NAP ACL ACT FLU ANT PHE FLR PYR BAA CHR BBF BEP BKF BAP total PAHc
American Spirit Blue King HP 2120 ± 174 428 ± 39 74 ± 19 792 ± 124 288 ± 29 611 ± 92 189 ± 32 172 ± 25 59 ± 3.4 97 ± 6.4 37 ± 2.0 19 ± 1.5 5.6 ± 0.5 38 ± 2.3 4929 ± 242
Camel Filters King Turkish HP 1790 ± 346 339 ± 34 68 ± 8.1 529 ± 69 178 ± 22 377 ± 34 152 ± 17 106 ± 21 44 ± 2.4 65 ± 4.1 33 ± 1.6 16 ± 0.4 6.3 ± 0.5 26 ± 1.8 3728 ± 358
Winston Red King HP 1550 ± 173 350 ± 89 74 ± 15 593 ± 85 180 ± 25 428 ± 78 167 ± 29 115 ± 26 45 ± 5.9 64 ± 7.7 35 ± 4.3 17 ± 2.1 6.2 ± 0.7 27 ± 3.6 3651 ± 232
Winston Red 100s HP 1510 ± 206 308 ± 31 54 ± 12 461 ± 81 144 ± 15 378 ± 63 173 ± 31 104 ± 31 39 ± 6.8 60 ± 8.9 31 ± 4.8 21 ± 3.1 4.1 ± 1.1 24 ± 3.6 3312 ± 237
Winston Gold King HP 1340 ± 191 304 ± 34 66 ± 18 492 ± 33 152 ± 9.0 350 ± 33 148 ± 20 92 ± 13 38 ± 5.0 54 ± 7.0 30 ± 3.4 14 ± 1.9 5.2 ± 0.7 23 ± 3.0 3108 ± 202
Marlboro Red 100s SP 1360 ± 187 254 ± 64 66 ± 15 489 ± 59 173 ± 32 366 ± 52 132 ± 19 109 ± 16 39 ± 2.0 55 ± 4.9 26 ± 2.1 12 ± 0.8 4.5 ± 0.4 23 ± 2.6 3108 ± 217
Marlboro Red King HP 1560 ± 377 204 ± 34 61 ± 10 422 ± 69 153 ± 22 321 ± 35 121 ± 24 99 ± 16 38 ± 5.8 56 ± 10 26 ± 4.6 12 ± 1.9 4.8 ± 1.0 23 ± 3.7 3100 ± 388
Marlboro Red 100s HP 1290 ± 238 236 ± 55 62 ± 11 476 ± 104 176 ± 25 314 ± 69 132 ± 21 113 ± 18 41 ± 4.7 61 ± 7.9 28 ± 3.7 12 ± 1.5 5.1 ± 0.9 25 ± 2.9 2970 ± 277
Pall Mall Blue King HP 1260 ± 202 275 ± 45 59 ± 6.8 422 ± 32 151 ± 10 346 ± 36 138 ± 12 104 ± 13 45 ± 2.9 66 ± 6.4 34 ± 2.7 17 ± 1.9 6.9 ± 0.8 26 ± 2.2 2950 ± 214
Marlboro Red King SP 1430 ± 363 191 ± 31 54 ± 7.5 389 ± 102 159 ± 23 311 ± 34 130 ± 23 104 ± 27 41 ± 8.1 61 ± 8.1 27 ± 3.6 12 ± 1.8 4.8 ± 1.0 23 ± 2.6 2937 ± 382
Kool Green King Menthol HP 1120 ± 327 293 ± 69 64 ± 19 478 ± 70 158 ± 23 352 ± 56 139 ± 25 100 ± 19 40 ± 4.6 59 ± 8.3 32 ± 4.0 15 ± 1.1 5.9 ± 0.8 24 ± 2.3 2881 ± 349
Capri Magenta Super Slims HP 1410 ± 194 272 ± 36 64 ± 8.7 406 ± 59 119 ± 24 271 ± 41 100 ± 18 67 ± 5.7 27 ± 3.0 36 ± 5.2 21 ± 1.9 10 ± 1.0 4.0 ± 0.4 16 ± 1.5 2822 ± 212
Kool Green King Menthol SP 1110 ± 347 289 ± 58 57 ± 9.4 455 ± 42 140 ± 15 340 ± 32 140 ± 15 89 ± 6.2 40 ± 3.1 58 ± 5.2 31 ± 2.8 15 ± 1.4 5.6 ± 0.6 24 ± 2.2 2792 ± 357
Vantage Multi Color King SP 1230 ± 319 251 ± 17 40 ± 8.1 327 ± 25 140 ± 10 360 ± 10 160 ± 21 106 ± 12 40 ± 3.8 57 ± 10 27 ± 2.7 23 ± 2.7 5.9 ± 0.6 24 ± 4.8 2790 ± 322
Benson & Hedges Green 100s Menthol HP 870 ± 431 308 ± 42 46 ± 7.1 443 ± 51 172 ± 27 441 ± 87 174 ± 19 114 ± 15 43 ± 4.7 61 ± 5.6 24 ± 2.5 20 ± 3.4 5.3 ± 0.7 26 ± 3.3 2748 ± 446
Winston White 100s HP 1230 ± 209 283 ± 40 46 ± 10 370 ± 85 123 ± 24 302 ± 43 130 ± 14 85 ± 14 31 ± 3.8 44 ± 7.3 25 ± 1.1 16 ± 1.6 3.6 ± 0.8 20 ± 1.2 2708 ± 235
Marlboro Gold 100s HP 1310 ± 292 269 ± 56 48 ± 7.1 328 ± 27 118 ± 13 279 ± 53 124 ± 18 85 ± 16 29 ± 4.1 42 ± 5.8 20 ± 2.4 13 ± 1.6 2.6 ± 0.9 17 ± 1.6 2685 ± 305
Camel Blue King Turkish HP 1190 ± 396 246 ± 48 56 ± 5.1 358 ± 53 129 ± 20 287 ± 59 114 ± 8.6 81 ± 6.9 35 ± 6.0 50 ± 8.2 26 ± 3.2 13 ± 1.7 4.7 ± 0.4 21 ± 2.6 2610 ± 408
Salem Green King Menthol HP 981 ± 710 278 ± 53 47 ± 11 392 ± 32 142 ± 10 340 ± 50 154 ± 25 104 ± 14 40 ± 6.2 57 ± 10 25 ± 3.3 21 ± 4.6 5.6 ± 0.9 23 ± 4.0 2610 ± 715
Maverick Gold 100s HP 1200 ± 168 241 ± 20 48 ± 12 362 ± 55 107 ± 12 259 ± 43 135 ± 22 90 ± 12 30 ± 2.3 47 ± 3.4 27 ± 2.8 17 ± 1.2 4.6 ± 1.7 20 ± 1.6 2586 ± 185
Newport Green 100s Menthol HP 935 ± 324 212 ± 38 55 ± 11 437 ± 86 156 ± 27 330 ± 50 139 ± 15 107 ± 15 43 ± 3.1 64 ± 3.8 35 ± 3.7 16 ± 1.6 7.0 ± 0.9 26 ± 2.8 2562 ± 343
Marlboro Green King Menthol HP 1020 ± 309 213 ± 59 57 ± 16 436 ± 84 156 ± 22 306 ± 54 122 ± 10 94 ± 15 35 ± 2.8 50 ± 4.4 23 ± 2.3 11 ± 1.3 4.2 ± 0.5 21 ± 3.2 2547 ± 332
Marlboro Red Label King HP 1190 ± 313 189 ± 23 52 ± 10 335 ± 66 132 ± 12 269 ± 43 111 ± 11 91 ± 19 32 ± 4.1 46 ± 5.8 23 ± 3.1 10 ± 1.3 4.0 ± 0.6 19 ± 2.5 2502 ± 325
Parliament Blue King HP 1380 ± 111 221 ± 19 37 ± 5.1 266 ± 37 92 ± 8.8 221 ± 13 94 ± 18 74 ± 13 24 ± 2.0 35 ± 4.5 17 ± 1.7 11 ± 2.0 2.0 ± 0.6 14 ± 1.5 2489 ± 122
Misty Blue Slims HP 1150 ± 191 249 ± 51 43 ± 5.2 307 ± 45 110 ± 22 261 ± 31 136 ± 14 93 ± 18 30 ± 3.9 44 ± 5.6 26 ± 2.0 16 ± 2.1 4.8 ± 1.1 19 ± 1.8 2488 ± 208
Doral Gold King HP 1100 ± 226 209 ± 18 34 ± 7.8 273 ± 38 116 ± 32 306 ± 64 141 ± 24 100 ± 19 36 ± 7.9 52 ± 9.0 24 ± 5.5 21 ± 4.6 6.0 ± 1.3 23 ± 7.1 2441 ± 243
Benson & Hedges Luxury Gold 100s SP 969 ± 101 228 ± 27 55 ± 5.8 400 ± 32 135 ± 15 279 ± 30 113 ± 15 84 ± 8.0 34 ± 2.8 49 ± 5.2 25 ± 2.0 12 ± 1.2 4.4 ± 0.5 21 ± 1.8 2407 ± 116
Basic Gold 100s SP 1140 ± 238 239 ± 36 38 ± 5.6 312 ± 34 108 ± 6.2 240 ± 27 108 ± 23 76 ± 14 29 ± 3.5 43 ± 4.8 22 ± 3.0 15 ± 1.8 3.5 ± 0.6 18 ± 2.6 2392 ± 246
Doral Silver 100s HP 1090 ± 195 218 ± 18 36 ± 4.7 294 ± 36 108 ± 9.0 259 ± 25 132 ± 25 89 ± 14 32 ± 3.1 47 ± 1.9 26 ± 3.1 17 ± 2.9 4.9 ± 1.5 19 ± 1.6 2373 ± 203
Marlboro Gold 100s SP 984 ± 139 204 ± 39 53 ± 9.2 367 ± 26 133 ± 10 292 ± 36 112 ± 14 89 ± 13 31 ± 1.3 43 ± 2.7 21 ± 1.0 9.3 ± 0.6 3.7 ± 0.3 18 ± 1.8 2359 ± 153
True Silver King SP 1020 ± 197 222 ± 31 52 ± 5.9 353 ± 21 113 ± 18 225 ± 14 111 ± 12 79 ± 12 28 ± 2.6 43 ± 2.8 24 ± 2.2 12 ± 1.3 4.9 ± 0.9 18 ± 2.0 2305 ± 203
Basic Gold 100s HP 1090 ± 198 223 ± 48 42 ± 6.2 311 ± 49 108 ± 6.5 234 ± 25 100 ± 14 72 ± 13 27 ± 3.0 40 ± 5.9 22 ± 3.1 13 ± 0.8 2.8 ± 0.9 17 ± 2.1 2302 ± 212
Carlton White 100s HP 1080 ± 605 218 ± 56 33 ± 6.6 251 ± 45 98 ± 18 251 ± 73 116 ± 19 72 ± 7.3 27 ± 8.5 35 ± 8.0 17 ± 4.2 13 ± 5.5 3.9 ± 0.9 17 ± 6.3 2232 ± 614
Salem Gold 100s Menthol HP 772 ± 172 202 ± 43 56 ± 10 418 ± 55 138 ± 20 297 ± 45 118 ± 13 83 ± 11 33 ± 3.2 49 ± 4.2 25 ± 2.6 12 ± 1.2 4.3 ± 0.5 20 ± 2.2 2227 ± 193
USA Gold 100s Menthol SP 975 ± 119 238 ± 30 40 ± 5.6 334 ± 55 104 ± 8.2 220 ± 31 107 ± 18 72 ± 13 21 ± 2.6 30 ± 5.1 18 ± 1.2 11 ± 1.1 2.5 ± 0.5 13 ± 1.6 2187 ± 140
Newport Green King Menthol SP 847 ± 80 216 ± 24 55 ± 7.0 357 ± 55 117 ± 13 244 ± 25 117 ± 18 86 ± 14 30 ± 3.6 46 ± 7.6 26 ± 3.7 12 ± 1.7 5.3 ± 0.7 19 ± 3.0 2176 ± 107
Salem Gold King Menthol HP 852 ± 179 224 ± 42 54 ± 7.0 343 ± 24 112 ± 11 257 ± 18 101 ± 13 84 ± 5.4 31 ± 1.7 45 ± 3.1 23 ± 2.6 11 ± 1.5 4.3 ± 0.6 18 ± 1.6 2158 ± 187
Newport Green King Menthol HP 806 ± 134 179 ± 14 49 ± 9.1 366 ± 74 129 ± 20 263 ± 47 120 ± 12 90 ± 11 31 ± 2.7 49 ± 6.3 25 ± 2.9 12 ± 1.2 5.1 ± 0.7 20 ± 3.3 2143 ± 163
NOW Gold 100s SP 978 ± 239 215 ± 37 32 ± 4.9 269 ± 35 97 ± 12 249 ± 40 115 ± 16 72 ± 8.5 27 ± 5.4 34 ± 6.6 17 ± 3.2 12 ± 3.0 3.9 ± 1.0 15 ± 2.9 2135 ± 249
Marlboro Gold King SP 956 ± 153 159 ± 13 47 ± 7.9 316 ± 63 116 ± 13 243 ± 35 90 ± 8.7 76 ± 7.4 29 ± 3.8 41 ± 4.7 19 ± 2.5 8.6 ± 1.2 3.4 ± 0.6 16 ± 3.1 2120 ± 171
Basic Blue 100s HP 896 ± 144 207 ± 24 35 ± 3.1 277 ± 39 106 ± 10 258 ± 25 119 ± 15 81 ± 8.8 31 ± 2.8 39 ± 4.3 19 ± 2.0 16 ± 2.1 4.5 ± 0.6 19 ± 3.1 2107 ± 155
Basic Green 100s Menthol HP 612 ± 269 226 ± 26 38 ± 2.6 333 ± 28 127 ± 11 306 ± 20 142 ± 7.6 92 ± 14 36 ± 4.3 49 ± 6.5 21 ± 1.8 18 ± 3.1 4.7 ± 0.4 20 ± 2.7 2024 ± 273
Merit Gold King SP 977 ± 386 198 ± 46 37 ± 6.5 245 ± 41 92 ± 18 206 ± 50 99 ± 13 63 ± 5.2 24 ± 6.7 35 ± 7.6 17 ± 4.0 11 ± 2.3 2.1 ± 0.7 14 ± 3.8 2020 ± 395
Marlboro Gold King HP 858 ± 192 152 ± 26 44 ± 8.9 296 ± 39 116 ± 17 246 ± 37 93 ± 5.8 83 ± 12 29 ± 3.0 40 ± 4.6 18 ± 3.2 8.6 ± 0.8 3.5 ± 0.3 17 ± 2.0 2004 ± 203
Marlboro Gold King Menthol HP 760 ± 205 164 ± 31 50 ± 11 334 ± 38 128 ± 9.4 259 ± 40 108 ± 16 79 ± 9.0 29 ± 1.8 40 ± 2.7 19 ± 0.3 8.7 ± 0.8 3.3 ± 0.2 17 ± 3.5 2000 ± 216
Kent Golden King SP 989 ± 199 202 ± 15 36 ± 5.7 250 ± 23 81 ± 4.9 174 ± 24 96 ± 24 72 ± 10 21 ± 2.7 31 ± 4.2 19 ± 2.2 12 ± 1.7 2.8 ± 0.9 13 ± 1.3 1998 ± 204
Virginia Slims Gold HP 909 ± 84 221 ± 15 35 ± 3.2 267 ± 25 91 ± 16 201 ± 30 97 ± 16 65 ± 11 21 ± 3.2 33 ± 7.6 16 ± 1.0 11 ± 2.4 2.3 ± 0.7 13 ± 1.1 1983 ± 97
Salem Silver 100s Menthol HP 766 ± 79 218 ± 25 38 ± 5.1 289 ± 13 107 ± 11 242 ± 22 106 ± 14 77 ± 7.9 25 ± 2.9 38 ± 4.9 20 ± 2.4 12 ± 1.4 2.9 ± 0.7 15 ± 2.5 1956 ± 89
Marlboro Silver 100s HP 608 ± 201 143 ± 15 45 ± 6.1 285 ± 26 101 ± 18 233 ± 30 86 ± 8.1 71 ± 13 25 ± 2.6 35 ± 4.9 16 ± 2.6 8.3 ± 1.4 2.9 ± 0.4 15 ± 2.5 1675 ± 207
Marlboro Silver King HP 678 ± 129 141 ± 16 36 ± 6.2 236 ± 21 88 ± 9.3 187 ± 25 74 ± 7.6 60 ± 7.0 22 ± 1.6 30 ± 3.0 15 ± 1.1 6.8 ± 0.6 2.5 ± 0.3 13 ± 2.1 1590 ± 135
Mean 1105 ± 269 235 ± 39 49 ± 9.4 371 ± 56 130 ± 18 292 ± 44 123 ± 18 89 ± 15 33 ± 4.2 48 ± 6.2 24 ± 2.9 14 ± 2.1 4.3 ± 0.8 20 ± 2.9 2538 ± 283
3R4Fd 926 ± 149 160 ± 25 45 ± 9.1 324 ± 36 114 ± 15 251 ± 32 100 ± 13 76 ± 11 30 ± 3.9 39 ± 4.9 19 ± 2.8 9.2 ± 0.9 3.6 ± 0.5 16 ± 2.1 2112 ± 160
a

Cigarettes products are sorted by total PAH quantity. Cigarette description abbreviations: HP, hard pack; SP, soft pack; King, king size (approximately 84 mm cigarette length); 100s, 100mm cigarette length.

b

See Figure 1 for PAH abbreviations. PAH constituents are sorted by molecular weight followed by boiling point. Individual PAH quantities were determined from 7 replicates.

c

Sum of quantities of the 14 individual PAHs.

d

PAH values are average of 25 replicates.

Statistical Analysis

Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients (r) were calculated using Microsoft Excel 2010 software with the correlation data analysis function. P-values, which measure statistical significance of correlation, were calculated using the mathematical formula for correlation critical value t, followed by Excel tdist function. Correlations are considered statistically significant when p-values are less than 0.05. Coefficients of determination (r2), which measure the goodness of fit between the smoke deliveries of BaP and other PAHs on the regression lines, were calculated using Microsoft Excel 2010 software with the linear regression analysis function.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

PAH Yields in Reference Cigarettes

For data quality control, we measured the levels of 14 PAHs in mainstream smoke from 3R4F reference cigarette (University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY) using both ISO and CI smoking regimens. Results are provided in Tables 12. The 3R4F cigarettes are constructed to represent typical American blended cigarettes consisting of mainly bright, burley, oriental, and reconstituted tobaccos.17 As depicted in Figure 2, the levels of 14 PAHs in the mainstream smoke of 3R4F are similar to those of 2R4F reference cigarette measured previously using the same GC/MS method.15 Moreover, a comparison to the 3R4F PAH data reported previously by Roemer17 shows comparable levels of pyrene, benz[a]anthracene, benzo[b]fluoranthene, benzo[k]fluoranthene and BaP with both smoking regimens (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

PAH Levels in 3R4F and 2R4F reference cigarettes. PAHs are arranged by ascending molecular weight and boiling point. Y-axis depicts PAH yield on a log-2 scale.

Figure 3 shows the coefficients of variance (CV) for each PAH yield of the 3R4F cigarette. They are based on 25 analytical determinations and range from 9.5% to 17.1% for ISO smoking and from 10% to 20.2% for CI smoking. As shown, the CI regimen has slightly higher variability than the ISO regimen for most PAH constituents. This is also shown by the overall CV of 13.9% compared to 12.0% for the ISO regimen. The higher CV of the CI regimen may be in part due to the sampling difference between the two smoking regimens (1 cigarette per pad for CI versus 3 cigarettes per pad for ISO).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Coefficients of variance of 3R4F PAH yields.

PAH Levels in U.S. Cigarettes

The yields of 14 PAHs in smoke particulate of 50 U.S. cigarette products measured by both ISO and CI smoking regimens are provided in Tables 12 respectively. We also calculated the total PAH yields by adding the amounts of the 14 individual PAHs. All 14 PAHs were detected in the 50 cigarette products ranging from sub-nanogram to microgram levels.

As shown in Figure 4, the PAH yields with the ISO smoking regimen vary widely among the commercial cigarettes with the amount of total mainstream smoke PAHs ranging from 0.139 to 2.6 µg per cigarette. Except for pyrene and benzo[k]fluoranthene, total and individual PAH yields differ more than 10-fold between highest and lowest delivery cigarettes (Table 1). Yield difference for naphthalene is nearly 60-fold.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Total PAH yields measured under ISO and CI smoking regimens. Cigarette abbreviation: ASB, American Spirit Blue.

With the CI smoking regimen, individual PAH levels are higher than those from using the ISO smoking regimen (Table 2). Figure 4 also shows greater total CI PAH levels compared to total ISO PAH levels. However, consistent with previous observation,15 PAH yield increase is disproportional and is more dramatic for cigarettes with low total ISO PAH smoke yields (Figure 4) because of filter ventilation. The difference in PAH yields between highest and lowest delivery cigarettes from the CI smoking regimen is 2- to 3-fold (Table 2). The wide range of deliveries under ISO is primarily a function of the wide range of filter ventilation levels for this set of products. Under CI conditions, the filter holes are blocked and the differences observed are more due to tobacco mass, filter length, paper porosity, and possibly filler nitrate content as a source of free radical scavengers18 that thwart PAH formation.

As shown in Figure 4, American Spirit Blue displays the highest total PAH yields measured by both ISO (2.6 µg/cigarette) and CI (4.9 µg/cigarette) smoking regimens. It also exhibits the highest yields of most of the 14 PAH constituents analyzed (Tables 1 and 2). Moreover, it delivered from 60% to 170% higher PAH yields than the average PAH yields of all 50 cigarettes with the ISO smoking regimen (Table 1). The highest PAH smoke yields of American Spirit Blue are in part attributable to its highest tobacco mass of 881 mg/cig, which is 216 mg more than the average tobacco mass of the other 49 cigarettes (665 mg/cig). Moreover, American Spirit cigarettes have been indicated to contain 100% Virginia tobacco which is flue-cured.19 Flue-cured tobaccos are known to generate higher levels of PAHs than other tobacco types, particularly those PAHs with high molecular weight.1516,20 Along with American Spirit Blue, Winston Red and Winston Red 100s are among the top five products with highest total PAH yields measured by both ISO and CI smoking regimens (Tables 1 and 2).

In contrast, among the test cigarettes, Carlton White 100s had the lowest total (139 ng/cigarette) and individual PAH yields with the ISO regimen (Figure 4), whereas Marlboro Silver had the lowest total PAH yields with the CI smoking regimen (1.6 µg/cigarette). The lower PAH smoke yields of Carlton White 100s and Marlboro Silver are in part attributable to their very low tobacco mass of 585 mg/cig. Moreover, Carlton White 100s has a high filter ventilation (62.3%) which also contributes to its lower ISO PAH deliveries.

As depicted in Figure 5, the average yields of individual PAHs for all 50 commercial cigarettes measured for ISO and CI smoking regimens are similar to those of 3R4F reference cigarette. Low molecular weight PAHs such as naphthalene, fluorene, and phenanthrene dominate the total PAH yields. Naphthalene is the most abundant PAH. In contrast, yields of high molecular weight PAHs such as benzo[b]fluoranthene, benzo[e]pyrene, benzo[k]fluoranthene and benzo[a]pyrene are much lower. These trends are consistent with previous studies.1516 With exception of a few PAHs, there is an overall inverse trend between PAH yield and molecular weight. Yield of benzo[k]fluoranthene was lowest among the PAH constituents tested.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Average yields of individual PAHs for all 50 commercial cigarettes. Y-axis depicts PAH yield on a log-2 scale.

We also examined correlations among PAH yields. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) and p-values were calculated using Microsoft Excel 2010 software and are provided in Tables 34. For the ISO smoking regimen (Table 3), except for the association between acenaphthene and benzo[e]pyrene, correlations among the 14 PAHs and total PAH range from moderate (r > 0.61) to strongly positive linear relationships (r > 0.95). All show high statistical significance with p-values below 0.001. Strongest associations exist for benz[a]anthracene, chrysene, and BaP with many r values greater than 0.9, whereas weaker correlations appear among naphthalene, acenaphthene, and benzo[e]pyrene. For the CI smoking regimen, correlations between the PAH constitutents are generally weaker than the ISO regimen (Table 4). However, strong associations remain with benz[a]anthracene, chrysene, and BaP with many r values greater than 0.9. In contrast, very weak correlations are observed among naphthalene, acenaphthene, and benzo[e]pyrene with a number of r values below 0.5. Notably, no correlation exists between acenaphthene and benzo[e]pyrene with the CI smoking regimen.

Table 3.

Pearson Coefficients and P-Values for Correlations between PAH levels in Mainstream Smoke of 50 Commercial U.S. Cigarette Products Measured by ISO Smoking Regimen

NAP ACL ACT FLU ANT PHE FLR PYR BAA CHR BBF BEP BKF BAP
ACL 0.867
<0.001
ACT 0.616
<0.001
0.811
<0.001
FLU 0.828
<0.001
0.903
<0.001
0.877
<0.001
ANT 0.783
<0.001
0.800
<0.001
0.800
<0.001
0.952
<0.001
PHE 0.826
<0.001
0.953
<0.001
0.806
<0.001
0.931
<0.001
0.858
<0.001
FLR 0.799
<0.001
0.950
<0.001
0.777
<0.001
0.883
<0.001
0.807
<0.001
0.955
<0.001
PYR 0.753
<0.001
0.838
<0.001
0.789
<0.001
0.885
<0.001
0.895
<0.001
0.843
<0.001
0.890
<0.001
BAA 0.804
<0.001
0.883
<0.001
0.794
<0.001
0.940
<0.001
0.930
<0.001
0.936
<0.001
0.932
<0.001
0.948
<0.001
CHR 0.804
<0.001
0.885
<0.001
0.810
<0.001
0.951
<0.001
0.945
<0.001
0.941
<0.001
0.929
<0.001
0.947
<0.001
0.993
<0.001
BBF 0.721
<0.001
0.856
<0.001
0.835
<0.001
0.886
<0.001
0.869
<0.001
0.873
<0.001
0.912
<0.001
0.956
<0.001
0.947
<0.001
0.945
<0.001
BEP 0.718
<0.001
0.783
<0.001
0.453
<0.001
0.669
<0.001
0.629
<0.001
0.790
<0.001
0.886
<0.001
0.777
<0.001
0.821
<0.001
0.797
<0.001
0.782
<0.001
BKF 0.613
<0.001
0.791
<0.001
0.745
<0.001
0.792
<0.001
0.770
<0.001
0.816
<0.001
0.886
<0.001
0.903
<0.001
0.901
<0.001
0.886
<0.001
0.960
<0.001
0.826
<0.001
BAP 0.794
<0.001
0.892
<0.001
0.794
<0.001
0.932
<0.001
0.919
<0.001
0.936
<0.001
0.940
<0.001
0.954
<0.001
0.994
<0.001
0.989
<0.001
0.963
<0.001
0.834
<0.001
0.921
<0.001
Total PAH 0.936
<0.001
0.958
<0.001
0.803
<0.001
0.959
<0.001
0.906
<0.001
0.957
<0.001
0.931
<0.001
0.887
<0.001
0.942
<0.001
0.946
<0.001
0.882
<0.001
0.780
<0.001
0.794
<0.001
0.938
<0.001

Pearson coefficients are shown in larger font and p-values in smaller font

Table 4.

Pearson Coefficients and P-Values for Correlations between PAH levels in Mainstream Smoke of 50 Commercial U.S. Cigarette Products Measured by CI Smoking Regimen

NAP ACL ACT FLU ANT PHE FLR PYR BAA CHR BBF BEP BKF BAP
ACL 0.720
<0.001
ACT 0.586
<0.001
0.565
<0.001
FLU 0.670
<0.001
0.778
<0.001
0.882
<0.001
ANT 0.643
<0.001
0.687
<0.001
0.783
<0.001
0.945
<0.001
PHE 0.636
<0.001
0.799
<0.001
0.671
<0.001
0.894
<0.001
0.937
<0.001
FLR 0.548
<0.001
0.797
<0.001
0.463
<0.001
0.722
<0.001
0.743
<0.001
0.880
<0.001
PYR 0.622
<0.001
0.679
<0.001
0.619
<0.001
0.842
<0.001
0.929
<0.001
0.928
<0.001
0.850
<0.001
BAA 0.599
<0.001
0.687
<0.001
0.694
<0.001
0.853
<0.001
0.918
<0.001
0.936
<0.001
0.859
<0.001
0.930
<0.001
CHR 0.623
<0.001
0.695
<0.001
0.706
<0.001
0.877
<0.001
0.933
<0.001
0.925
<0.001
0.837
<0.001
0.949
<0.001
0.980
<0.001
BBF 0.604
<0.001
0.699
<0.001
0.748
<0.001
0.817
<0.001
0.762
<0.001
0.770
<0.001
0.786
<0.001
0.788
<0.001
0.864
<0.001
0.888
<0.001
BEP 0.353
0.012
0.641
<0.001
0.060
0.678
0.347
0.013
0.377
0.007
0.600
<0.001
0.847
<0.001
0.592
<0.001
0.608
<0.001
0.586
<0.001
0.591
<0.001
BKF 0.331
0.019
0.481
<0.001
0.547
<0.001
0.599
<0.001
0.618
<0.001
0.660
<0.001
0.732
<0.001
0.697
<0.001
0.816
<0.001
0.778
<0.001
0.842
<0.001
0.614
<0.001
BAP 0.614
<0.001
0.714
<0.001
0.675
<0.001
0.863
<0.001
0.918
<0.001
0.939
<0.001
0.875
<0.001
0.947
<0.001
0.986
<0.001
0.984
<0.001
0.884
<0.001
0.642
<0.001
0.816
<0.001
Total PAH 0.913
<0.001
0.858
<0.001
0.744
<0.001
0.893
<0.001
0.873
<0.001
0.882
<0.001
0.776
<0.001
0.845
<0.001
0.839
<0.001
0.856
<0.001
0.795
<0.001
0.501
<0.001
0.558
<0.001
0.852
<0.001

Pearson coefficients are shown in larger font and p-values in smaller font

As stated, BaP has been extensively studied among the PAHs because of its efficacy in inducing lung tumors.5 In analytical studies, BaP has often been used as a surrogate for other PAHs.5 In effect, many studies reported only BaP levels in cigarette smoke.2123 Accordingly, part of this study focused on the correlations of BaP to determine if it can be a surrogate to estimate the levels of other PAHs in smoke particulate. As shown in Figure 6, BaP displays moderate linear relationships with small PAHs such as naphthalene and acenaphthene (r = 0.79) for the ISO smoking regimen. However, it correlates well with most other PAHs and total PAHs (r ≥ 0.9). Correlations appear strengthened as the size of PAHs increases. Significant correlations exist for pyrene and benzo[b]fluoranthene with r values greater than 0.95. In particular, BaP strongly correlates to benz[a]anthracene and chrysene with r values ≥ 0.98. Note that the chemical structures of benz[a]anthracene and chrysene resemble that of BaP (Figure 1). Surprisingly, correlation with larger benzo[e]pyrene is lower (r = 0.83). As shown in Figure 1, although having the same molecular weight, the backbone structure of BaP differs from that of benzo[e]pyrene, suggesting there may be different precursors or pyrosynthetic pathways to high molecular weight PAHs with different chemical structures. Correlations between BaP and other PAHs weaken under the CI smoking regimen (Figure 6) which may be attributable to its higher coefficients of variance (Figure 3).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Spider-chart showing BaP correlation with individual and total PAHs. Individual PAHs are arranged clockwise by ascending molecular weight and boiling point.

To evaluate the utility of using BaP levels to estimate smoke yields of other PAHs from the ISO smoking regimen, we plotted yields of other PAHs with high correlation coefficients (r ≥ 0.9) versus BaP yields, and performed simple linear regression analysis. As shown in Figure 7, the data fit regression lines without outliers, thus confirming proportional linear relationships of BaP with total and other PAHs. In particular, the high coefficients of determination for pyrene and benzo[b]fluoranthene (r2 > 0.91) show low variability for estimating their smoke deliveries using BaP yields (Figure 7b–c). Moreover, the very high r2 values (r2 ≥ 0.97) for benz[a]anthracene and chrysene (Figure 7c) indicate an excellent prediction of benz[a]anthracene and chrysene levels using BaP.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Linear relationships between BaP yields with other PAHs using the ISO smoking regimen.

We also plotted the yields of several high molecular weight PAHs versus BaP yields measured under the CI smoking regimen. As shown in Figure 8, while linear regression lines show excellent correlation between BaP and benz[a]anthracene and chrysene (r2 > 0.96), linear relationships with benzo[b]fluoranthene and benzo[k]fluoranthene are weaker, indicating lower prediction reliability under the CI smoking regimen.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Linear relationships between BaP yields and other high molecular weight PAHs using the CI smoking regimen.

The results of the correlation and linear regression analyses demonstrate possible quantitative relationships between BaP and other specific PAH compounds in cigarette smoke measured for both ISO and CI smoking regimens. In particular, very strong correlations exist between BaP and those with similar molecular weight and chemical structures.

In summary, this study provides a survey of PAH mainstream smoke yields for popular U.S. cigarettes having a wide range of machine generated smoke deliveries. The results serve as a useful reference for comparing relative smoke PAH deliveries among different cigarettes as well as a baseline to determine if changes occur with time. The study identifies substantial differences in PAH levels in the mainstream smoke of different commercial cigarettes. Highest PAH levels were found in Virgina blended American Spirit Blue. Correlation analysis reveals strong associations between BaP and most of the other PAHs under the ISO smoking regimen. Correlations from the CI smoking regimen are generally weaker, but remain significant. Linear regression analysis suggests that BaP has potential as a surrogate marker for other PAHs in cigarette smoke, particularly those with similar molecular weights and chemical structures. Further studies are necessary to extend BaP correlation to other PAHs, particularly those of tetracyclic and higher PAHs on IARC’s carcinogen list and FDA’s HPHC list that were not included in this study.

Acknowledgments

Funding

This research was funded by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Tobacco Products.

ABBREVIATIONS

ACL

acenaphthylene

ACT

acenaphthene

ANT

anthracene

BAA

benz[a]anthracene

BAP

benzo[a]pyrene

BBF

benzo[b]fluoranthene

BEP

benzo[e]pyrene

BKF

benzo[k]fluoranthene

CDC

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

CHR

chrysene

FLR

fluoranthene

FLU

fluorene

GC/MS

gas chromatography/mass spectrometry

NAP

naphthalene

PHE

phenanthrene

PYR

pyrene

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

DISCLAIMER

This report is not a formal dissemination of information by the FDA or CDC, nor does it represent position or policy of FDA. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors only.

REFERENCES

  • 1.World Health Organization. WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic 2013: Enforcing Bans on Tobacco Advertising, Promotion and Sponsorship. [accessed June 2015];2013 http://www.who.int/tobacco/global_report/2013/en/
  • 2.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Smoking—50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General, Atlanta GA. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2014. [accessed June 2015]. http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/sgr/50th-anniversary/index.htm. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rodgman A, Perfetti TA. The chemical components of tobacco and tobacco smoke. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2009. pp. 1–110. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Vol. 92. Lyon, France: IARC; 2010. Some Non-heterocyclic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Some Related Exposures; p. 773. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hecht SS. Tobacco smoke carcinogens and lung cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1999;91:1194–1210. doi: 10.1093/jnci/91.14.1194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Stepanov I, Villalta PW, Knezevich A, Jensen J, Hatsukami D, Hecht SS. Analysis of 23 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Smokeless Tobacco by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2010;23:66–73. doi: 10.1021/tx900281u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.McAdam KG, Faizi A, Kimpton H, Porter A, Rodu B. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in US and Swedish smokeless tobacco products. Chem. Cent. J. 2013;7:151. doi: 10.1186/1752-153X-7-151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bentley HR, Burgan JG. Polynuclear hydrocarbons in tobacco and tobacco smoke Part 1 3:4-Benzopyrene. Analyst. 1960;385:723–727. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Food and Drug Administration. Harmful and potentially harmful constituents in tobacco products and tobacco smoke; Established list. Fed. Regist. 2012;77(64):20034–20037. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Food and Drug Administration. Draft guidance for industry: Reporting harmful and potentially harmful constituents in tobacco products and tobacco smoke under section 904(a)(3) of the federal food, drug, and cosmetic act. [accessed June 2015];2012 http://www.fda.gov/TobaccoProducts/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/ucm297752.htm.
  • 11.Maxwell JC., Jr . In: The Maxwell Report: Year End & Fourth Quarter 2007 Sales Estimates for the Cigarette Industry. Maxwell John C., Jr, editor. Richmond, VA: 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.International Organization for Standardization. Standard 3402: Tobacco and tobacco products – Atmosphere for conditioning and testing. 1999 [Google Scholar]
  • 13.International Organization for Standardization. Standard 3308: Routine analytical cigarette-smoking machine - Definitions and standard conditions. 2000 [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Health Canada. Official Method T-115: Determination of “tar”, nicotine and carbon monoxide in mainstream smoke. 1999 [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ding YS, Trommel JS, Yan XJ, Ashley D, Watson CH. Determination of 14 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in mainstream smoke from domestic cigarettes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005;39:471–478. doi: 10.1021/es048690k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ding YS, Yan XJ, Jain RB, Lopp E, Tavakoli A, Polzin GM, Stanfill SB, Ashley DL, Watson CH. Determination of 14 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in mainstream smoke from U.S. brand and non-U.S. brand cigarettes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006;40:1133–1138. doi: 10.1021/es0517320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Roemer E, Schramke H, Weiler H, Buettner A, Kausche S, Weber S, Berges A, Stueber M, Muench M, Trelles-Sticken E, Pype J, Kohlgrueber K, Voelkel H, Wittke S. Mainstream smoke chemistry and in vitro and in vivo toxicity of the reference cigarettes 3R4F and 2R4F. Contrib. Tobacco Res. 2012;25:316–335. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hoffmann D, Hoffmann I. The changing cigarette, 1950–1995. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health. 1977;50:307–364. doi: 10.1080/009841097160393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Natural American Spirit, Bates No. 2051835191–2051835206 [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ding YS, Zhang L, Jain RB, Jain N, Wang RY, Ashley DL, Watson CH. Levels of tobacco-specific nitrosamines and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in mainstream smoke from different tobacco varieties. Cancer Epidem. Biomar. 2008;17:3366–3371. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Risner CH. The determination of benzo[a]pyrene in the total particulate matter of cigarette smoke. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 1998;26:113–120. doi: 10.1093/chromsci/26.3.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dumont J, Larocque-Lazure F, Iorio C. An Alternative Isolation Procedure for the Subsequent Determination of Benzo[a]pyrene in Total Particulate Matter of Cigarette Smoke. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 1993;31:371–374. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kayali MN, Rubiobarroso S. Determination of Benzo[a]pyrene in Total Particulate Matter of Virginia and Black Tobacco-Smoke by Hplc with Fluorometric Detection. J. Liq. Chromatogr. 1995;18:1617–1632. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES