Skip to main content
HHS Author Manuscripts logoLink to HHS Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 20.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2014 Jul 18;47(4):467–475. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.06.013

Gender Differences in Smoking Among U.S. Working Adults

Girija Syamlal 1, Jacek M Mazurek 1, Shanta R Dube 1
PMCID: PMC4542001  NIHMSID: NIHMS715941  PMID: 25049215

Abstract

Background

Cigarette smoking remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Although gender differences in cigarette smoking in the U.S. population have been documented, information on these differences among working adults is limited.

Purpose

To describe the current smoking prevalence by gender among working U.S. adults and examine gender differences in smoking by occupation.

Methods

The 2004–2011 National Health Interview Survey data for adults aged ≥18 years that were working in the week prior to the interview (N=132,215) were analyzed in 2013. Current cigarette smokers were those who smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their lifetime and currently smoke every day or some days.

Results

During 2004–2011, an estimated 22.8% of men workers and 18.3% of women workers were current smokers. Of the current smokers, women workers had higher odds of being an everyday smoker (prevalence OR [POR]=1.17, 95% CI=1.09, 1.26); having poor self-rated emotional health (POR=1.28, 95% CI=1.15, 1.41); and having chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (POR=2.45, 95% CI=2.14, 2.80), heart disease (POR=1.27, 95% CI=1.12, 1.45), and current asthma (POR=2.21, 95% CI=1.96, 2.49) compared with men workers. Women in “supervisors, construction, and extraction” (38.9%) occupations and men in “extraction” (40.5%) occupations had the highest smoking prevalence.

Conclusion

Among working adults, women had lower prevalence of smoking than men, yet women who smoke were more likely than men to have adverse health outcomes, including self-rated poorer physical and emotional health.

Introduction

Cigarette smoking remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality.14 In 2011, 21.6% of men and 16.5% of women were current smokers in the U.S.2 Similar patterns were observed among working adults (21.5% of men and 17.4% of women).5 Women who smoke have higher burden of smoking-related diseases than men who smoke.611 Women smokers have a 25% increased risk of developing coronary heart disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and a high incidence of lung cancer compared to men who smoke.6,10 The percentage of women in the workforce has also increased from 38% in 1970 to 47% in 2010.12

Furthermore, previous studies1317 have demonstrated the additive effect of cigarette smoking on adverse health outcomes and certain occupational exposures. Understanding occupational factors, socioeconomic characteristics, and smoking behavior of working men and women may guide targeted gender-specific interventions and more effective policies, smoking-cessation programs, and counseling strategies.11,18 This study estimates gender-specific cigarette smoking prevalence by occupation and examines the association between smoking behaviors, select socioeconomic characteristics, and health status among working men and women.

Methods

The National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) collects health information from the U.S. civilian non-institutionalized population.19,20 The survey response rates ranged from 72.5% in 2004 to 66.3% in 2011.19,20

Data on current occupation were collected from adults who were working in the week prior to the interview.20 Because of small sample sizes, 94 available detailed occupations were collapsed into 45 occupations using National Center for Health Statistics criteria20 and into four major occupational categories using criteria of Ham et al.21 Current cigarette smokers were those who smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their lifetime and currently smoke “every day” or “some days.”19

Data from the 2004–2011 NHIS were combined to improve precision and reliability of the estimates.19 Bivariable logistic regression was used to calculate prevalence ORs (PORs) and multivariable logistic regression to calculate PORs adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, education, and combined family income.10,18,19,21 The referent group was all other currently employed adults who were not in the occupation of interest. All tests were two-sided, and differences were considered significant at α=0.05. Prevalence estimates with relative SE (RSE, calculated as SE of the estimate divided by the estimate) >30% and <50% are reported but may be unreliable. Estimates with RSE ≥50% were considered unreliable and are not reported.19 Analyses were conducted in 2013 using SAS, version 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary NC).

Results

During 2004–2011, of the 141 million U.S. adults working the week prior to the interview, 53.5% were men, 46.5% were women, and 20.7% were current cigarette smokers. Smoking prevalence was highest among non-Hispanic whites and those with education ≤high school, income <$35,000, no health insurance, and living in the Midwest (Table 1). Smoking declined among working men (3.0%, p<0.0001) and women (2.8%, p<0.0001) during 2004–2011.

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics and prevalence of cigarette smoking by gender among working U.S. adults

Characteristics Number in samplea
Estimatedb currently working population (in 1,000s)
Current smokers (prevalence % [95% CI])
Men Women Men Women Men Women
Age group (years)

 18–24 6,817 7,115 9,302 8,604 26.9 (25.5, 28.4) 19.4 (18.2, 20.6)

 25–44 31,564 31,054 35,246 28,865 23.7 (23.1, 24.3) 19.7 (19.1, 20.3)

 45–64 24,071 25,475 27,733 25,418 21.7 (21.0, 22.4) 17.3 (16.7, 17.9)

 >65 3,071 3,048 3,008 2,447 10.2 (8.9, 11.5) 9.2 (8.0, 10.4)

Race/ethnicity

 Hispanic 13,233 11,279 11,865 7,587 18.6 (17.7, 19.5) 10.1 (9.4, 10.8)

 Non-Hispanic white 40,318 40,104 52,016 45,862 24.0 (23.4, 24.6) 20.9 (20.4, 21.5)

 Non-Hispanic black 7,836 11,453 7,367 8,332 22.7 (21.5, 23.9) 15.3 (14.4, 16.1)

 Other 4,136 3,856 4,040 3,552 19.9 (18.4, 21.5) 9.7 (8.4, 10.9)

Education

 <High school 9,126 6,744 9,340 5,496 32.5 (31.1, 33.9) 26.0 (25.4, 28.2)

 High school graduate 17,290 16,277 20,489 16,256 31.7 (30.9, 32.6) 25.7 (24.8, 26.6)

 >High school 38,631 43,240 44,911 43,173 16.8 (16.2, 17.3) 14.5 (14.1, 15.0)

 Unknown 476 431 549 407 c c

Household income ($)

 0–34,999 18,155 22,125 15,943 16,113 32.3 (31.4, 33.3) 26.1 (25.2, 26.9)

 35,000–74,999 21,118 20,578 24,131 20,318 25.1 (24.4, 25.8) 19.7 (19.0, 20.4)

 ≥75,000 19,035 17,026 26,676 21,742 15.8 (15.1, 16.5) 12.1 (11.5, 12.7)

 Unknown 7,215 6,963 8,540 7,160 20.8 (19.5, 22.0) 16.0 (15.0, 17.0)

Health insurance

 Not insured 14,279 10,995 14,866 9,663 35.2 (34.2, 36.3) 28.2 (27.1, 29.4)

 Insured 51,038 55,484 60,135 55,436 19.7 (19.2, 20.3) 16.6 (16.2, 17.0)

 Unknown 206 213 288 234 c c

Region

 Northeast 14,279 10,995 12,924 12,192 20.9 (19.6, 22.2) 17.5 (16.7, 18.4)

 Midwest 51,038 55,484 18,226 16,447 25.3 (24.3, 26.3) 21.4 (20.5, 22.3)

 South 23,610 24,436 26,950 23,099 24.4 (23.6, 25.1) 19.2 (18.5, 19.8)

 West 16,547 15,276 17,190 13,595 19.3 (18.4, 20.2) 13.9 (13.1, 14.6)

Total 65,523 66,692 75,289 65,333 22.8 (22.4, 23.3) 18.3 (17.9, 18.7)
a

The 2004–2011 National Health Interview Survey respondents aged ≥18 years, working in the week prior to the survey

b

Estimated average annual populations are weighted to represent current U.S. men and women workers aged 18 years who were employed in the week prior to the interview.

c

Relative SE for the estimated number of people who currently smoke >30%; estimate suppressed.

After adjusting for covariates, women who smoked had significantly higher odds of being an everyday smoker (POR=1.16); making an attempt to quit smoking (POR=1.10); having poor self-rated physical health (POR=1.20); having poor self-rated emotional health (POR=1.28); missing work for >7 days at a job or business because of illness or injury (POR=1.76); and having COPD (POR=2.45), any cancer (POR=2.57), heart disease (POR=1.27), or current asthma (POR=2.21) than men who smoked (Table 2).

Table 2.

Smoking behavior and health characteristics of current smokers by gender among working U.S. adults

Characteristics Men (% [95% CI]) Women (% [95% CI]) Women compared with men (PORa [95% CI])
Frequency of smoking
 Every day 76.8 (75.9, 77.7) 79.4 (78.5, 80.3) 1.16 (1.08, 1.24)
 Some days 23.2 (22.3, 24.1) 20.6 (19.7, 21.5) 0.86 (0.81, 0.93)
Attempted to quit smoking
 Yes 43.9 (42.8, 45.0) 46.2 (45.0, 47.3) 1.10 (1.03, 1.17)
 No 56.1 (55.0, 57.2) 53.8 (52.7, 55.0) 0.91 (0.86, 0.97)
Number of cigarettes/dayb
 ≤14 51.9 (50.9, 53.0) 62.4 (61.3, 63.4) 1.55 (1.46, 1.65)
 >14 48.1 (47.0, 49.1) 37.6 (36.6, 38.7) 0.65 (0.61, 0.68)
Age first started to smoke (years)
 ≤18 69.4 (68.4, 70.4) 68.0 (66.9, 69.0) 1.03 (0.97, 1.11)
 >18 30.6 (29.7, 31.2) 32.0 (31.0, 33.1) 0.97 (0.91, 1.03)
Self-rated physical health
 Excellent/good 92.0 (91.5, 92.5) 90.6 (90.0, 91.2) 0.83 (0.75, 0.92)
 Poor/fair 8.0 (7.5, 8.5) 9.4 (8.8, 10.0) 1.20 (1.09, 1.33)
Self-rated emotional health
 Good 42.5 (40.7, 44.4) 37.0 (35.4, 38.6) 0.78 (0.71, 0.87)
 Poor 57.3 (55.4, 59.1) 63.0 (61.4, 64.6) 1.28 (1.15, 1.41)
Chronic diseases
 COPD 3.8 (3.4, 4.2) 8.9 (8.4, 9.5) 2.45 (2.14, 2.80)
 Heart disease 4.3 (3.9, 4.7) 5.4 (5.0, 5.9) 1.27 (1.12, 1.45)
 Any cancerf 2.6 (2.3, 2.9) 6.4 (5.8, 6.9) 2.57 (2.23, 2.96)
 Lung cancer 3.9 (1.3, 6.5) 1.1 (0.22, 1.89) 0.35 (0.11, 1.05)
 Current asthma 4.4 (3.9, 4.8) 9.1 (8.4, 9.7) 2.21 (1.96, 2.49)
 Asthma attack 40.4 (35.4, 45.5) 51.1 (47.4, 55.8) 1.45 (1.13, 1.87)
Seen/talked to a physician
 Yes 51.4 (50.4, 52.4) 66.0 (64.9, 67.1) 1.81 (1.70, 1.93)
 No 48.6 (47.6, 49.6) 34.0 (32.9, 35.1) 0.55 (0.52, 0.59)
Light/moderate physical activity
 Yes 50.6 (49.5, 51.8) 55.1 (53.9, 56.3) 1.18 (1.11, 1.25)
 No 49.4 (48.2, 50.5) 44.9 ( 43.7, 46.1) 0.85 (0.79, 0.90)
Lost work days
 0 56.7 (55.7, 57.7) 45.9 (44.8, 47.0) 0.67 (0.63, 0.71)
 1–7 34.6 (33.6, 35.9) 41.6 (40.5, 42.7) 1.50 (1.41, 1.59)
 >7 8.7 (8.1, 9.3) 12.5 (11.7, 13.2) 1.76 (1.59, 1.96)

Note: Boldface indicates statistical significance; estimates are weighted to represent the U.S. working population.

a

POR represents the odds of women who are current smokers with specific smoking behaviors or health outcome compared with men who are current smokers with specific smoking behaviors or health outcome. PORs were adjusted for age, race, education, and income.

b

Overall average number of cigarettes smoked among working population who currently smoked was 14.

COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; POR, prevalence OR.

Men working in “precision production, craft, construction, repair operators, fabricators, and laborers” (POR=1.94) occupations had the highest odds of being a current smoker. Among detailed occupations, “vehicle and mobile equipment mechanics, installers, and repairers” (POR=1.88) had the highest POR (Table 3), and “legal” (0.33) occupations had the lowest POR.

Table 3.

Cigarette smoking prevalence and PORs by occupation and gender among working U.S. adults

Occupation group Men
Women
Women compared with men PORc (95% CI)
Estimateda workers (in 1000’s) Prevalence % (95% CI) PORb (95% CI) Estimateda workers (in 1000’s) Prevalence % (95% CI) PORb (95% CI)
Managerial and professional specialty technical, sales, and administrative support 35,548 16.6 (16.0, 17.1) 0.55 (0.52, 0.58) 44,433 15.9 (15.5, 16.4) 0.73 (0.69, 0.77) 0.90 (0.86, 0.94)

 Chief executives, general and operations managers, and legislators 1,447 12.8 (10.5, 15.1) 0.62 (0.50, 0.76) 481 10.4 (7.7, 13.2) 0.62 (0.46, 0.84) 0.72 (0.50, 1.03)

 Advertising, marketing, promotions, public relations, and sales managers 503 13.2 (9.4, 17.1) 0.60 (0.42, 0.85) 366 16.4 (12.2, 20.5) 0.96 (0.71, 1.30) 1.09 (0.68, 1.75)

 Operations specialties managers and other management 6,357 16.9 (15.6, 18.2) 0.75 (0.68, 0.82) 3,964 16.1 (14.6, 17.7) 1.00 (0.89, 1.12) 0.93 (0.80, 1.09)

 Business and financial operations 2,739 13.7 (12.1, 15.3) 0.64 (0.56, 0.74) 3,213 15.0 (13.5, 16.6) 0.94 (0.83, 1.06) 1.06 (0.89, 1.27)

 Computer and mathematical 2,767 13.2 (11.5, 14.8) 0.57 (0.49, 0.66) 950 11.4 (9.2, 13.6) 0.67 (0.53, 0.84) 0.81 (0.61, 1.08)

 Entertainers and performers, sports and related 376 15.0 (10.3, 19.6) 0.65 (0.45, 0.95) 384 10.2 (6.6, 13.7) 0.53 (0.38, 0.84) 0.53 (0.33, 0.84)

 Life, physical, and social science 729 10.2 (7.7, 12.7) 0.48 (0.36, 0.63) 655 9.4 (6.7, 12.1) 0.57 (0.41, 0.78) 0.90 (0.58, 1.40)

 Community and social services 905 9.7 (7.5, 11.9) 0.41 (0.32, 0.53) 1,410 12.8 (10.8, 14.8) 0.78 (0.65, 0.94) 1.37 (1.00, 1.90)

 Legal 792 7.1 (5.0, 9.1) 0.33 (0.24, 0.45) 841 13.0 (10.0, 16.1) 0.78 (0.60, 1.02) 1.53 (0.99, 2.37)

 Postsecondary teachers 710 8.9 (6.5, 11.2) 0.38 (0.28, 0.52) 672 7.0 (4.9, 9.1) 0.40 (0.29, 0.56) 0.77 (0.48, 1.23)

 Primary, secondary, and special education school teachers 1,433 9.4 (7.5, 11.2) 0.40 (0.32, 0.49) 4,675 7.6 (6.7, 8.5) 0.39 (0.34, 0.44) 0.74 (0.57, 0.95)

 Librarians, curators, and archivists and other education-related 152 16.4 (9.8, 23.0) 0.72 (0.45, 1.16) 1,192 11.1 (8.8, 13.4) 0.57 (0.45, 072) 0.55 (0.31, 0.96)

 Art and design 523 17.8 (13.2, 22.3) 0.93 (0.65, 1.27) 494 14.7 (10.8, 18.6) 0.93 (0.67, 1.27) 0.78 (0.49, 1.24)

 Architecture and engineering 2,299 15.0 (12.9, 17.0) 0.71 (0.61, 0.84) 228 14.2 (9.1, 19.4) 0.79 (0.52, 1.20) 0.95 (0.54, 1.67)

 Media and communication 552 16.3 (12.7, 19.9) 0.79 (0.60, 1.05) 510 11.0 (8.2, 13.9) 0.65 (0.48, 0.89) 0.62 (0.41, 0.92)

 Healthcare practitioners and technical 1,810 8.8 (7.2, 10.3) 0.37 (0.30, 0.45) 5,320 13.7 (12.6, 14.8) 0.82 (0.74, 0.91) 1.56 (1.25, 1.94)

 Supervisors, sales 2,242 24.0 (21.7, 26.2) 1.14 (1.00, 1.29) 1,505 24.7 (21.8, 27.6) 1.42 (1.21, 1.67) 0.88 (0.72, 1.07)

 Retail sales 2,418 25.2 (23.1, 27.4) 1.05 (0.93, 1.20) 3,622 23.2 (21.5, 25.0) 1.12 (1.01, 1.24) 0.78 (0.66, 0.91)

 Sales representatives, services, wholesale, and manufacturing 2,813 17.3 (15.3, 19.3) 0.84 (0.73, 0.97) 1,917 17.8 (15.9, 19.8) 1.06 (0.92, 1.22) 0.93 (0.76, 1.14)

 Supervisors, office and administrative support, and communication equipment operators 1,057 20.0 (16.8, 23.1) 0.86 (0.70, 1.05) 3,216 17.2 (15.6, 18.8) 0.92 (0.83, 1.04) 0.77 (0.61, 0.97)

 Administrative support 3,827 23.2 (21.5, 24.9) 0.95 (0.85, 1.05) 10,230 19.5 (18.6, 20.5) 1.08 (1.00, 1.16) 0.79 (0.71, 0.89)

Services 10,664 24.6 (23.4, 25.7) 1.00 (0.93, 1.07) 14,442 24.0 (23.1, 24.9) 1.34 (1.27, 1.42) 0.90 (0.83, 0.97)

 Healthcare support 389 20.9 (16.0, 25.8) 0.83 (0.60, 1.14) 2,719 26.3 (24.3, 28.3) 1.43 (1.29, 1.59) 1.22 (0.86, 1.72)

 Protective service 2,167 15.5 (13.6, 17.4) 0.63 (0.54, 0.74) 597 22.8 (18.7, 26.9) 1.26 (0.99, 1.60) 1.46 (1.09, 1.95)

 Supervisors, food preparation, and serving 479 33.9 (28.5, 39.3) 1.72 (1.31, 2.25) 424 30.3 (24.9, 35.7) 1.69 (1.30, 2.20) 0.75 (0.52, 1.10)

 Cooks and food preparation 1,322 36.0 (32.2, 39.8) 1.45 (1.22, 1.74) 1,237 24.7 (21.7, 27.7) 1.11 (0.93, 1.32) 0.53 (0.42, 0.68)

 Food and beverage serving and related 1,233 34.3 (30.2, 38.3) 1.48 (1.22, 1.80) 2,325 34.0 (31.5, 36.5) 1.91 (1.70, 2.15) 0.92 (0.75, 1.13)

 Supervisors, building and grounds cleaning and maintenance 364 23.3 (17.6, 29.0) 1.05 (0.74, 1.50) 122 33.9 (24.2, 43.6) 2.10 (1.29, 3.56) 1.43 (0.78,2.63)

 Building cleaning and pest control 1,753 25.3 (22.5, 28.1) 0.92 (0.79, 1.08) 2,048 21.0 (18.8, 23.2) 0.83 (0.72, 0.96) 0.69 (0.56, 0.85)

 Grounds maintenance 1,160 27.3 (23.8, 30.8) 1.00 (0.82, 1.22) 81 34.4 (22.5, 46.4) 2.57 (1.40, 4.69) 1.55 (0.84, 2.83)

 Personal care and service 893 23.3 (20.0, 26.7) 0.93 (0.76, 1.14) 3,480 20.3 (18.5, 22.0) 1.03 (0.92, 1.15) 0.80 (0.63, 1.01)

Farming, fishing, and forestry 765 23.9 (19.8, 28.0) 0.79 (0.62, 1.02) 209 13.3 (8.0, 18.5) 0.47 (0.30, 0.75) 0.37 (0.22, 0.63)

Precision production, craft, construction, repair operators, fabricators, and laborers 25,818 31.3 (30.6, 32.1) 1.94 (1.83, 2.06) 4,473 27.2 (25.5, 28.8) 1.46 (1.33, 1.61) 0.68 (0.62, 0.74)

 Supervisors, construction, and extraction 792 31.4 (27.1, 35.7) 1.48 (1.20, 1.83) 24 38.9 (16.2, 61.6) 3.00 (1.07, 8.44) 1.46 (0.49, 4.35)

 Construction trade workers and helpers 7,064 34.1 (32.5, 35.7) 1.62 (1.49, 1.77) 176 36.3 (28.0, 44.5) 2.38 (1.62, 3.51) 0.96 (0.64, 1.43)

 Extraction 159 40.5 (28.8, 52.2) 1.83 (1.13, 2.95) 0 nc nc 0.58 (0.31, 1.09)

 Supervisors of installation, maintenance, and repair 301 24.2 (17.7, 30.8) 1.27 (0.86, 1.89) 25 33.3 (6.6, 60.0) 2.41 (0.66, 8.75) 1.35 (0.34, 5.44)

 Electrical and electronic equipment mechanics, installers, and repairers 720 23.5 (19.6, 27.4) 1.19 (0.94, 1.50) 75 25.8 (14.2, 37.5) 1.99 (1.08, 3.65) 1.21 (0.63, 2.33)

 Vehicle and mobile equipment mechanics, installers, and repairers 3,851 31.3 (29.4, 33.1) 1.88 (1.43, 1.75) 106 33.7 (24.3, 43.2) 1.86 (1.18, 2.94) 0.86 (0.54, 1.37)

 Supervisors, production 633 28.7 (24.1, 33.2) 1.52 (1.20, 1.94) 157 25.8 (17.9, 33.7) 1.46 (0.92, 2.31) 0.68 (0.42, 1.13)

 Assemblers and fabricators 794 27.6 (23.4, 31.8) 1.11 (0.89, 1.40) 521 28.4 (23.6, 33.1) 1.42 (1.10, 1.83) 0.88 (0.64, 1.22)

 Food processing 341 29.7 (23.4, 35.9) 1.07 (0.77, 1.48) 228 30.7 (22.6, 38.8) 1.48 (1.00, 2.18) 0.92 (0.57, 1.49)

 Metal and plastic workers 1,552 35.7 (32.6, 38.8) 1.77 (1.52, 2.06) 232 26.5 (19.9, 33.2) 1.35 (0.93, 1.96) 0.53 (0.35, 0.80)

 Printing workers 261 31.7 (24.4, 39.0) 1.60 (1.10, 2.34) 84 19.6 (9.2, 30.0) 1.13 (0.56, 2.29) 0.50 (0.24, 1.03)

 Textile, apparel, and furnishings 246 24.7 (18.3, 31.2) 0.92 (0.63, 1.36) 454 18.8 (14.9, 22.7) 0.75 (0.58, 0.98) 0.59 (0.37, 0.93)

 Wood workers, plant and system operators, other production 2,383 28.2 (26.0, 30.4) 1.21 (1.07, 1.37) 1,042 26.4 (22.9, 29.8) 1.28 (1.07, 1.55) 0.77 (0.61, 0.95)

 Transportation and material moving 6,720 30.5 (29.1, 32.0) 1.35 (1.25, 1.46) 1,347 28.3 (25.6, 31.1) 1.48 (1.28, 1.72) 0.77 (0.65, 0.90)

Refused, not ascertained, do not know 2,494 15.9 (13.5, 18.3) nc 1,728 10.4 (8.6, 12.1) nc 0.59 (0.46, 0.77)

Total 75,289 22.8 (22.4, 23.3) nc 65,333 18.3 (17.9, 18.7) nc 0.71 (0.69, 0.74)

Note: Boldface indicates statistical significance.

a

Estimated annual average populations are weighted to represent current U.S. male/female workers aged ≥18 years by 45 regrouped occupations.

b

PORs represent the odds of workers that are current smokers belonging to a specific occupation of interest compared with the odds of all other workers. Analysis was done separately for men and women; PORs are adjusted for age, race, education, and income.

c

PORs represent the odds of women being a current smoker in a specific occupation of interest, as compared with the same odds of men being current smokers in the same occupation group of interest. nc, not calculated; POR, prevalence OR.

Women working in “services” (POR=1.34) occupations had the highest odds of being a current smoker. Among detailed occupations, “supervisors, construction, and extraction” (POR=3.00) had the highest POR and “primary, secondary, and special education school teachers” (POR=0.39) had the lowest POR. After adjusting for age, race, education and income, women in “healthcare practitioners and technical” (POR=1.56); “protective service” (POR=1.46); and “community and social services” (POR=1.37) occupations had significantly higher smoking prevalence than men (Table 3).

Discussion

During 2004–2011, significantly more men (22.8%) than women (18.3%) were current smokers. Women smokers were more likely to report poor physical and mental health, COPD, heart disease, cancer, and current asthma than men who smoke. Factors associated with smoking and adverse health outcomes in women (e.g., biological factors, genetic and hormonal factors, socioeconomic factors, occupational exposure, job stress, personal lifestyles, secondhand smoke exposure, or a combination of these factors) have been reported previously.10,11,2325

In both men and women, cigarette smoking prevalence varied widely by occupational group. In certain occupations, the prevalence of smoking was three times greater than the Healthy People 2020 goal that aims to reduce cigarette smoking prevalence to ≤12%.26 Similar findings have been previously documented.21,22,27

Women in health care–related occupations had higher smoking prevalence than men. This finding is underscored by the fact that more women than men work in this sector and that healthcare providers are critical in the delivery of clinical preventive services for reducing tobacco use. Social or cultural factors related to the occupation may be associated with higher smoking prevalence.21

Holahan and colleagues28 found that presence of smokers in the workplace and at home was significantly associated with higher odds of being a current smoker. Our findings of lowest prevalence among women in teaching-related occupations and among men in “legal” occupations are supported by previous reports.6,21,29 The observed differences of smoking prevalences by job type could be explained, in part, by occupational and environmental factors, such as low educational level, increased job stressors, workplace culture, exposure to dusts and chemicals, and low rates of tobacco control programs and policies.21,27,29

Although the NHIS data did not include measures to assess workplace policies or exposures to secondhand smoke, other national surveys21,27,29 have shown that the proportion of smoke-free worksites are lower in mining, production, food services, and construction occupations than in professional and related services occupations, and the current results show that smoking prevalences are higher among these occupations. Detailed description of current smoking among working men and women by occupation will inform interventions that can be targeted to specific worksite settings. These interventions may include a combination of effective strategies such as tobacco-free policies, cessation programs, and educational campaigns.3033

Study limitations include the use of self-reported smoking information that was not validated by biochemical tests.34,35 Cross-sectional analysis of NHIS data does not assess the long-term health effects of smoking or causal inferences between smoking and health outcomes. The study only included currently employed adults; however, additional analyses examining longest-held job found similar results in both men and women.

Smoking is the most important modifiable risk factor associated with various health outcomes. Women had lower prevalence of smoking, yet a higher prevalence of adverse health outcomes when compared with men. For some occupations, women smoked more than men. Future studies should explore methods to include indicators on individual’s industry and occupation, smoking behaviors, gender, and health outcomes for designing targeted intervention programs specific to the group. Targeting occupations with high smoking prevalence while considering gender differences may further reduce smoking and improve overall well-being. Results of this study can be used to implement existing, effective tobacco control strategies in coordination with gender-specific interventions.27,28,3033

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Cecil M. Burchfiel, PhD, Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, and Robert B. Gerzoff, MS, Office on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, for their helpful comments.

Footnotes

No financial disclosures were reported by the authors of this paper.

References

  • 1.CDC. The health consequences of smoking—50 years of progress: a report of the surgeon general. Atlanta GA: USDHHS, CDC, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2014. www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/reports/50-years-of-progress/exec-summary.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.CDC. Current cigarette smoking among adults—U.S. 2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012;61(44):889–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.CDC. Smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and productivity losses—U.S. 2000–2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008;57(45):1226–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.USDHHS. Health consequences of smoking: a report of the Surgeon General. cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/sgr/2004/
  • 5.CDC. Current cigarette smoking prevalence among working adults—U.S. 2004–2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60(38):1305–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Freedman ND, Leitzmann MF, Hollenbeck AR, Schatzkin A, Abnet CC. Cigarette smoking and subsequent risk of lung cancer in men and women: analysis of a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(7):649–56. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70154-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.CDC. Curent cigarette smoking among adults—U.S. 2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007;56(44):1157–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chen Y, Dales R, Krewski D, Breithaupt K. Increased effects of smoking and obesity on asthma among female Canadians: the National Population Health Survey, 1994–1995. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;150(3):255–62. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kennedy SM, Chambers R, Du W, Dimich-Ward H. Environmental and occupational exposures: do they affect chronic obstructive pulmonary disease differently in women and men? Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2007;4(8):692–4. doi: 10.1513/pats.200707-094SD. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Huxley RR, Woodward M. Cigarette smoking as a risk factor for coronary heart disease in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Lancet. 2011;378(9799):1297–5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60781-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kirkland S, Greaves L, Devichand P. Gender differences in smoking and self-reported indicators of health. BMC Womens Health. 2004;(4S1):S7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-4-S1-S7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.U.S. Census Bureau. How do we know? America’s changing labor force. Washington DC: U.S. Census Bureau; 2011. www.census.gov/how/pdf/EEO_infographic.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Markowitz SB, Levin SM, Miller A, Morabia A. Asbestos, asbestosis, smoking, and lung cancer. New findings from the North American Insulator Cohort. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188(1):90–6. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201302-0257OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kurihara N, Wada Silicosis and smoking strongly increase lung cancer risk in silica-exposed workers. Industrial Health. 2004;42(3):303–14. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.42.303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Blanc PD, Iribarren C, Trupin L, et al. Occupational exposures and the risk of COPD: dusty trades revisited. Thorax. 2009;64(1):6–12. doi: 10.1136/thx.2008.099390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Matheson MC, Benke G, Raven J, et al. Biological dust exposure in the workplace is a risk factor for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax. 2005;60(8):645–51. doi: 10.1136/thx.2004.035170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sunyer J, Zock JP, Kromhout H, et al. Lung function decline, chronic bronchitis, and occupational exposures in young adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;172(9):1139–45. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200504-648OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Recommendations for worksite-based interventions to improve workers’ health. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38(2S):S232–S236. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.10.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.CDC. Data file documentation, National Health Interview Survey. Hyattsville MD: CDC, National Center for Health Statistics; 2010. ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/Dataset_Documentation/NHIS/2010/srvydesc.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.CDC. Data file documentation, National Health Interview Survey. Hyattsville MD: CDC, National Center for Health Statistics; 2004–2009. ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/Datasets/NHIS/2004_2009_IO_note_to_users.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ham DC, Przybeck T, Strickland JR, Luke DA, Bierut LJ, Evanoff BA. Occupation and workplace policies predict smoking behaviors: analysis of national data from current population survey. J Occup Environ Med. 2011;53(11):1337–45. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3182337778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bang KM, Kim JH. Prevalence of cigarette smoking by occupation and industry in the U. S Am J Ind Med. 2001;40(3):233–9. doi: 10.1002/ajim.1094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Denton M, Prus S, Walters V. Gender differences in health: a Canadian study of the psychosocial, structural and behavioral determinants of health. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58(12):2585–600. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kouvonen A, Kivimäki M, Virtanen M, Pentti J, Vahtera J. Work stress, smoking status, and smoking intensity: an observational study of 46,190 employees. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59(1):63–9. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.019752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ng DM, Jeffery RW. Relationships between perceived stress and health behaviors in a sample of working adults. Health Psychol. 2003;22(6):638–42. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.22.6.638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.USDHHS. Healthy People 2020. Objective TU-1.1: Cigarette smoking. healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/objectiveslist.aspx?topicId=41#285350.
  • 27.Chin DL, Hong O, Gillen M, Bates MN, Okechukwu CA. Cigarette smoking in building trades workers: the impact of work environment. Am J Ind Med. 2012;55(5):429–39. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Holahan CK, Holahan CJ, Li X, Jung S. Social influences on smoking in American workers: the role of the presence of smokers in the workplace and in the home. Am J Health Promot. 2013;28(2):105–7. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.120604-ARB-283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shopland DR, Anderson CM, Burns DM, Gerlach KK. Disparities in smoke-free workplace policies among food service workers. J Occup Environ Med. 2004;46(4):347–56. doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000121129.78510.be. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.CDC. Best practices for comprehensive tobacco control programs—2007. Atlanta GA: USDHHS, CDC, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cahill K, Moher M, Lancaster T. Workplace interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(4):CD003440. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003440.pub3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Fiore MC, Jaen CR, Baker TB, et al. Clinical practice guideline. Rockville MD: USDHHS, Public Health Service; 2008. Treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 update. www.surgeongeneral.gov/tobacco/treating_tobacco_use08.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Farrelly MC, Evans WN, Sfekas AE. The impact of workplace smoking bans: results from a national survey. Tob Control. 1999;8(3):272–7. doi: 10.1136/tc.8.3.272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Caraballo RS, Giovino GA, Pechacek TF, Mowery PD. Factors associated with discrepancies between self-reports on cigarette smoking and measured serum cotinine levels among person aged 17 years or older: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;153(8):807–14. doi: 10.1093/aje/153.8.807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Patrick DL, Cheadle A, Thompson DC, Diehr P, Koepsell T, Kinne S. The validity of self-reported smoking: a review and meta-analysis. Am J Public Health. 1994;84(7):1087–93. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.7.1086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES