Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2015 Aug 19;81(18):6098–6107. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00883-15

Diversity, Structures, and Collagen-Degrading Mechanisms of Bacterial Collagenolytic Proteases

Yu-Zhong Zhang 1, Li-Yuan Ran 1, Chun-Yang Li 1, Xiu-Lan Chen 1,
Editor: F E Löffler
PMCID: PMC4542243  PMID: 26150451

Abstract

Bacterial collagenolytic proteases are important because of their essential role in global collagen degradation and because of their virulence in some human bacterial infections. Bacterial collagenolytic proteases include some metalloproteases of the M9 family from Clostridium or Vibrio strains, some serine proteases distributed in the S1, S8, and S53 families, and members of the U32 family. In recent years, there has been remarkable progress in discovering new bacterial collagenolytic proteases and in investigating the collagen-degrading mechanisms of bacterial collagenolytic proteases. This review provides comprehensive insight into bacterial collagenolytic proteases, especially focusing on the structures and collagen-degrading mechanisms of representative bacterial collagenolytic proteases in each family. The roles of bacterial collagenolytic proteases in human diseases and global nitrogen cycling, together with the biotechnological and medical applications for these proteases, are also briefly discussed.

INTRODUCTION

Collagen is the most abundant and ubiquitous material that occurs in the extracellular matrices of animals. Nearly 30% of the total proteins in mammalian bodies are various types of collagens, which are essential structural components of all connective tissues (1). Collagen serves as an important nitrogen source in the global nitrogen cycle, primarily due to its tremendous distribution in the animal kingdom all over the world. Collagens are a large family consisting of 28 different members, which share a helical structure made up of three polypeptide chains (1). The polypeptide chains are mostly composed of repeating Gly-X-Y triplets, where X and Y are frequently proline and hydroxyproline, respectively. Each polypeptide chain is composed of triple-helical domains, which are flanked by nonhelical regions (2). Nonhelical regions are present in all procollagens (1). Type I collagen has one major helical domain, but there are 21 to 26 interruptions in the helix structure of type IV collagen (3). For type I and III collagens, a large part of each nonhelical region in procollagens, which is called propeptide, is proteolytically removed when procollagens are processed into mature molecules, and the remaining parts at the N and C termini of each mature collagen molecule are called telopeptides, which are capable of forming intramolecular and intermolecular cross-links to enhance the tensile strength of collagen fibrils (4). In type VI collagen, the C-terminal nonhelical domain is kept during posttranslational processing (5).

Collagens can be classified into several subgroups when they are organized into supramolecular assemblies. Fibril-forming collagen, such as type I or III collagen, forms the structural basis of connective tissues in all mammals. The molecules of this type of collagen axially polymerize to form a microfibril, and then further aggregate structures, fibrils and fascicles, are successively formed (6). The individual molecules in fibrillar collagens are staggered from each other by approximately 67 nm, allowing covalent bonds with adjacent molecules that extend beyond their individual ends (7). Type IV collagen, a major constituent of mammalian basement membranes, represents another type of supramolecular organization which forms three-dimensional networks (3). Other major subgroups include fibril-associated collagens with interrupted triple helices, beaded-filament-forming collagens, anchoring fibril collagens, and transmembrane collagens (8).

Because of its special structure, collagen is resistant to most common proteases and can be degraded only by a few types of proteases from mammals or bacteria. These proteases that can degrade one or more types of collagens are regarded as collagenolytic proteases, and these include mammalian matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), mammalian cysteine proteases, and some bacterial proteases. MMPs have been widely studied for their importance in mammal development and for their involvement in human diseases, and they have been introduced in other reviews (911). Bacterial collagenolytic proteases include some metalloproteases and serine proteases. The bacterial collagenolytic metalloproteases reported so far are some members of the M9 family in the MEROPS database (http://merops.sanger.ac.uk) (12), which are Clostridium collagenases and Vibrio collagenases. Bacterial collagenolytic serine proteases are distributed in the S1, S8, and S53 families. In addition, some members of the U32 family, mainly from pathogenic bacteria, are also reported to be collagenolytic proteases.

In recent years, there has been remarkable progress in identifying new bacterial collagenolytic proteases and their degradation mechanisms on collagen. In this paper, a comprehensive introduction of various bacterial collagenolytic proteases is presented, with a focus on the structures and collagen-degrading mechanisms of representative bacterial collagenolytic proteases. In addition, the roles of bacterial collagenolytic proteases in human diseases and global nitrogen cycling, as well as their biotechnological and medical applications, are also briefly discussed.

Before further discussing bacterial collagenolytic proteases, it is necessary to discuss the relationship between bacterial collagenolytic proteases and bacterial collagenases to avoid confusion. Bacterial collagenases are usually considered to be enzymes that cleave helical regions of fibrillar collagen molecules under physiological conditions (13). However, this concept of bacterial collagenase is not always used in such a strict standard in publications. Bacterial proteases which can only hydrolyze denatured collagen or type IV collagen are sometimes called collagenases. Here, we suggest that the term “bacterial collagenolytic proteases” be used to refer to all proteases that can degrade at least one type of collagen. Bacterial collagenolytic proteases include true collagenases and other proteases with collagenolytic activity.

CLOSTRIDIUM COLLAGENASES FROM THE M9 FAMILY

Diversity.

The collagenase secreted by Clostridium histolyticum reported first by MacLennan et al. in 1953 was the first bacterial collagenase to be discovered and studied (14). Since then, the collagenases from Clostridium histolyticum have been studied in detail and extensively used in basic science laboratories and for medical treatment. These Clostridium collagenases are divided into two classes, I and II, with class I being encoded by the gene colG and class II by colH. The C. histolyticum genome contains both genes. colG encodes a 1,118-amino-acid precursor, and colH encodes a 1,021-amino-acid precursor. ColG is secreted as a 1,000-amino-acid protein (Y119 to K1118), and ColH is secreted as a 981-amino-acid protein (V41 to R1021) (1517). In addition to collagenases ColG and ColH, at least five gelatinases were identified from C. histolyticum (16, 17). The N-terminal amino acid sequences of these gelatinases coincide with that of either ColG or ColH, indicating that these gelatinases are produced from a full-length collagenase by the proteolytic removal of C-terminal fragments (17). Collagenases from other Clostridium species, such as ColA from Clostridium perfringens (18) and ColT from Clostridium tetani (19), have also been reported. All Clostridium collagenases are members of the M9B subfamily in the MEROPS database (12).

Structure.

A Clostridium collagenase molecule is composed of two parts: the N-terminal collagenase unit (or module) and the C-terminal recruitment domains (20, 21). The collagenase unit contains an N-terminal activator domain and a C-terminal peptidase domain that contains a conserved zinc-binding motif and functions as a catalytic domain. The collagenase unit is able to independently show collagenolytic activity (20). The recruitment domains usually contain one or two collagen-binding domains (CBDs) and one or two polycystic kidney disease (PKD)-like domains, but ColT, which has no PKD-like domain, is an exception (1821). The recruitment domains are not needed for degradation of triple-helical collagen but are most likely needed for larger collagen entities such as fibrils (20, 22). Clostridium collagenases usually show differences in their C-terminal recruitment domains and/or their zinc-binding motifs (Fig. 1).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Schematic diagrams of the domain organization of typical collagenolytic proteases from bacteria. The domain structures of mature clostridial collagenases ColG (BAA77453), ColH (BAA34542), and ColT (AAO37456) were drawn with reference to a paper by Eckhard et al. (21), and the others were deduced from the sequences of mature ColA (BAA02941) secreted by Clostridium perfringens, VMC (AAC23708) from Vibrio mimicus, VAC (CAA44501) from Vibrio alginolyticus, VHC (BAK39964) from Grimontia (Vibrio) hollisae, SOT (BAI44325) from Streptomyces omiyaensis, MO-1 (BAF30978) from Geobacillus collagenovorans MO-1, MCP-01 (ABD14413) from Pseudoalteromonas sp. SM9913, myroicolsin (AEC33275) from Myroides profundi D25, kumamolisin-As (BAC41257) from Alicyclobacillus sendaiensis, and PrtC (AAA25650) from Porphyromonas gingivalis. Both Clostridium and Vibrio collagenases are gluzincins with Glu as the third proteinaceous zinc ligand.

Although the overall structure of Clostridium collagenases is still not completely known, the crystal structures of the collagenase unit of ColG (20), the peptidase domains of ColH and ColT (21), the PKD-like domains of ColG and ColH (22, 23), and the CBDs of ColG and ColH (24, 25) have been solved. The N-terminal activator domain and the C-terminal peptidase domain in the collagenase unit of ColG form a saddle-shaped architecture. The activator domain, the left saddle flap, comprises an array of 12 parallel α-helices, and the peptidase domain, the right saddle flap, adopts a thermolysin-like peptidase fold (Fig. 2) (20). In addition to an active zinc ion, a calcium ion is also seen in the active site of Clostridium collagenases. Both ions are required for the full enzymatic activity (21). The three PKD-like domains from ColG and ColH are structurally similar, adopting a V-set Ig-like fold. Each PKD-like domain contains a calcium ion, which is likely involved in interdomain alignment and aids the domain stability. However, some structural differences between the ColG and ColH PKD-like domains have also been found. There are surface aromatic residues in the ColH PKD-like domains but not in the ColG PKD-like domain (23). The CBDs from ColG and ColH adopt a β-sheet sandwich fold, in which a collagen-binding cleft is seen. Two calcium ions are coordinated in a CBD molecule, and these are critical for maintaining the function and stability of the CBDs (24, 25). It has not yet been determined whether the CBD can function as a helicase to unwind the collagen triple helix.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Structures of ColG (M9), ColH (M9), MCP-01 (S8), and kumamolisin-As (S53). For ColG, the activator domain and the peptidase domain of the collagenase unit (PDB accession number 2Y50) (20) are colored in purple and gray, respectively, and the PKD (PDB accession number 4AQO) (21) and the CBD (PDB accession number 1NQD) (24) are colored in yellow and orange, respectively. For ColH, the peptidase domain (PDB accession number 4AR1) (21), the PKD (PDB accession number 4U7K) (23), and the CBD (PDB accession number 3JQW) (25) are colored in gray, yellow, and orange, respectively. The catalytic domains of both MCP-01 (PDB accession number 3VV3) (65) and kumamolisin-As (PDB accession number 1SN7) (72) are shown in gray. The catalytic triads of serine collagenolytic proteases MCP-01 (Asp49, His104, and Ser269) and kumamolisin-As (Ser278, Glu78, and Asp82) are shown in stick representation. The Zn2+ in ColG and ColH is shown in orange, and Ca2+ is colored in green for all enzymes.

Collagenolytic mechanism.

The class I and II collagenases are true endopeptidases. ColG is suggested to have two states for collagen hydrolysis. The activator domain and the catalytic domain in the collagenase module remain mostly closed during collagen cleavage but relax to the open ground state once the collagen is degraded (20). Unlike MMPs, which cleave native collagens into characteristic three-quarter and one-quarter fragments, the collagenases from Clostridium histolyticum hydrolyze native collagens into a mixture of small peptides (26, 27). The class I and II collagenases initially attack distinct hyperreactive sites at Y-Gly bonds in the repeating Gly-X-Y collagen sequence (27). The amino acid preference at P1 to P3 and P1′ to P3′ of both classes of collagenases has been determined with synthetic peptides (28, 29), and this has been comprehensively described by Van Wart (30). In recent years, new materials and techniques, such as immobilized positional peptide libraries and proteomic identification of protease cleavage sites, have been used to study the substrate specificity of Clostridium collagenases, and new profiles of the prime and nonprime cleavage site specificities and their molecular bases have been illustrated (31, 32). The two classes of collagenases bind to different portions of the collagen and have different specificities for cutting native collagens, showing synergy in collagen degradation (33, 34).

VIBRIO COLLAGENASES FROM THE M9 FAMILY

Diversity and structure.

The extracellular proteases from Vibrio spp. have been widely studied because of their important roles in virulence. Vibrio extracellular proteases are divided into three classes based on their structure and function (35, 36). The class I proteases, which are members of the M4 family, are not discussed in this article, because they have no collagenolytic activity. The proteases in class II and class III all have collagenolytic activity and are all members of subfamily M9A in the MEROPS database (12, 36). However, the enzymes in these two classes have significant differences in structure and function (Fig. 1 and Table 1). Notably, the class II proteases have a zinc-binding motif (HEYTH), contain no C-terminal domain, and cannot hydrolyze casein (37, 38), while the class III proteases have a zinc-binding motif (HEYVH), contain a PKD-like domain and a prepetidase C-terminal (PPC) domain at their carboxyl terminus, and can hydrolyze casein (36, 39, 40). However, the collagenase from Grimontia hollisae 1706B, which was first named Vibrio hollisae 1706B in 1982 (41) and reclassified in 2003 (42), is an exception among the class III proteases (43). Although it has the same zinc-binding motif as the other class III members, this enzyme does not have a C-terminal PKD-like domain and cannot hydrolyze casein. It has been suggested that it represents a new group of Vibrio collagenases (43). Thus far, no crystal structure of a Vibrio collagenase or its domain has been solved.

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of representative collagenolytic proteases

Family Class Name Origin Mol mass (kDa) Motif/catalytic triad GenBank accession no. Substrates
M9B I ColG Clostridium histolyticum 116 HEYTH BAA77453 Type I, II, and III collagens (15, 28)
I ColA Clostridium perfringens type C NCIB 10662 116 HEFTH BAA02941 Type I collagen, Pz peptide, azocoll (18)
II ColH Clostridium histolyticum 98 HEYTH BAA34542 Type I, II, and III collagens (16)
M9A II VMC Vibrio mimicus ATCC 33653 62 HEYTH AAC23708 Type I, II, and III collagens, gelatin, Cbz-GPLGP, Cbz-GPGGPA (37)
II PrtVp Vibrio parahaemolyticus 93 62 HEYTH CAA86734 Type I, II, III, and IV collagens, FALGPA (38)
III VAC Vibrio alginolyticus 82 HEYVH CAA44501 Gelatin, casein, collagen, synthetic substrate (39)
III VPPC Vibrio parahaemolyticus 04 90 HEYVH AAG59883 Type I collagen, gelatin, casein, Cbz-GPGGPA (36)
III VPM Vibrio parahaemolyticus FYZ8621.4 90 HEYVH ABF19104 Type I, II, III, and IV collagens, gelatin, casein, Cbz-GPGGPA (40)
S1 SOT Streptomyces omiyaensis 23 His75, Asp120, Ser210 BAI44325 Type I and IV collagens (50)
SGT Streptomyces griseus ATCC 10137 23 His73, Asp118, Ser208 AAA26820 Type I collagen (50)
S8 Geobacillus collagenovorans MO-1 105 Asp196, His260, Ser590 BAF30978 Type I and IV collagens (52)
MCP-01 Pseudoalteromonas sp. SM9913 66 Asp49, His104, Ser269 ABD14413 Type I, II, and IV collagens, gelatin, casein, Pz peptide (63)
Myroicolsin Myroides profundi D25 56 Asp129, His174, Ser378 AEC33275 Type I collagen, gelatin (66)
S53 Kumamolisin-As Alicyclobacillus sendaiensis NTAP-1 37 Glu78, Asp82, Ser278 BAC41257 Gelatin, relaxed collagen (69)
U32 PrtC Porphyromonas gingivalis ATCC 53977 70 (dimer) AAA25650 Reconstituted type I collagen, heat-denatured type I collagen, azocoll (78)

Collagenolytic mechanism.

Vibrio collagenases cleave triple-helical collagen in a manner similar to MMPs in the first step of degradation. They attack at a point three-quarters of the way from the N terminus by hydrolyzing the preferential peptide bond, Xaa—Gly. Vibrio collagenase cleaves native collagen at a much higher rate than vertebrate MMP1 (44, 45). Vibrio collagenase hydrolyzes the Pz (4-phenylazobenzyloxycarbonyl) peptide (Pz-Pro-Leu-Gly-Pro-d-Arg) by cleaving the same peptide bond (Leu—Gly) as Clostridium collagenase (44, 45). Because the crystal structure of Vibrio collagenase is not solved, it is still unclear how Vibrio collagenase recognizes and degrades collagen. Although the class II proteases do not contain a C-terminal extension, it is reported that the FAXWXXT motif in the carboxyl terminus of Vibrio mimicus collagenase is involved in binding to collagen (46). In contrast, neither the PKD-like domain nor the PPC domain of the class III proteases is yet demonstrated to function as a collagen-binding domain.

BACTERIAL SERINE COLLAGENOLYTIC PROTEASES FROM THE S1 FAMILY

Of the reported collagenolytic serine proteases in the S1 family, most are from invertebrate animals. The protease isolated from a fiddler crab (Uca pugilator) was the first serine protease found to be capable of cleaving native type I triple-helical collagen. The crystal structure of this protease was solved in 1997, and structural analysis showed that it has no collagen-binding domain and that the substrate-binding pocket is enlarged relative to that of trypsin, owing to the insertion of several amino acids (47). Its cleavage pattern on collagen is similar to that of MMPs (47, 48). Fewer reports on the S1 collagenolytic serine proteases from bacteria exist. Uesugi et al. (50) purified an S1 collagenolytic protease, SOT (Streptomyces omiyaensis trypsin), from Streptomyces omiyaensis, and it has 77% identity with the trypsin SGT (Streptomyces griseus trypsin) from S. griseus in the primary structure (49, 50). SOT and SGT show similar pH and temperature optima, thermostabilities, and substrate preferences. Both SOT and SGT greatly hydrolyze type I collagen, showing much higher activities than commercial C. histolyticum collagenase type I (Sigma). SOT also has a high activity towards type IV collagen, but the ability of SGT to hydrolyze type IV collagen is poor. A comparison of the substrate specificities of the constructed chimeras of SOT and SGT indicates that the N-terminal domains of these enzymes are associated with their specificity toward structural protein substrates (50). Because SOT and SGT can degrade type I collagen at 37°C, these S1 collagenolytic proteases can be regarded as bacterial collagenases.

BACTERIAL SERINE COLLAGENOLYTIC PROTEASES FROM THE S8 FAMILY

Diversity.

The S8 family, also known as the subtilisin or subtilase family, is the second-largest family of serine proteases. Proteases in this family are all characterized by an Asp/His/Ser catalytic triad and an alpha/beta-fold catalytic center containing a seven-stranded parallel β-sheet (51). While most proteases in the S8 family have no collagenolytic activity, some S8 proteases have been reported in recent years to be collagenolytic proteases. The thermostable protease from Geobacillus collagenovorans MO-1 was the first reported S8 collagenolytic protease. This enzyme has a C-terminal collagen-binding domain, and its cleavage sites on collagen are varied but specific (52, 53). Several more S8 proteases with collagenolytic activity have been reported from environmental bacteria and archaea (5459) and from human pathogens (6062). Recently, two S8 proteases from deep-sea bacteria, deseasin MCP-01 from Pseudoalteromonas sp. strain SM9913 and myroicolsin from Myroides profundi D25, were characterized as collagenolytic proteases, and their actions toward collagen degradation were also revealed (6366).

Structure and collagenolytic mechanism.

Deseasin MCP-01 contains an S8 catalytic domain, a linker, a proprotein convertase domain (P domain), and a PKD-like domain (Fig. 1) (67). Its C-terminal PKD-like domain is responsible for collagen binding, and Try36 in the PKD-like domain plays a key role in collagen binding (63). The PKD-like domain of MCP-01 can swell collagen but cannot unwind the collagen triple helix (64). The structure of the catalytic domain of MCP-01 has been solved (65), and this showed that it adopts a fold similar to subtilisin Carlsberg, the protype of the S8 family, which has no collagenolytic activity. The catalytic triad of MCP-01 is composed of Asp49, His104, and Ser269 (Fig. 2 and Table 1). Structural and mutational analyses indicated that compared to subtilisin Carlsberg, MCP-1 has an enlarged substrate-binding pocket, which is necessary for collagen recognition. The substrate-binding pocket is composed of three loops, and the acidic and aromatic residues on these loops form a negatively charged, hydrophobic environment for collagen binding. The catalytic domain of MCP-01 alone can degrade type I collagen, but with a lower efficiency than the intact MCP-01, suggesting that the PKD domain in MCP-01 is helpful for collagen degradation (65).

MCP-01 cleaves type I, II, and IV collagens, gelatin, and fish collagen (63). Atomic force microscopy observation and biochemical analysis of the action of MCP-01 on bovine type I collagen fibers confirmed that both MCP-01 and its catalytic domain progressively release single fibrils from collagen fibers and release collagen monomers from fibrils mainly by hydrolyzing proteoglycans and telopeptides in the collagen fibers (65). The catalytic domain can further degrade type I triple-helical collagen and cleave collagen chains with multiple sites (63, 65). MCP-01 displayed a nonstrict preference for peptide bonds with Pro or basic residues at the P1 site and/or Gly at the P1′ site in collagen. His211 in the S1 pocket is the key residue responsible for the preference of MCP-01 for the P1 basic residues (65).

The S8 protease myroicolsin from Myroides profundi D25 also has a C-terminal domain, a β-jelly roll domain (Fig. 1) (66), which, however, has no collagen-binding ability. Myroicolsin had broad specificity toward several types of collagens, including types I, II, and IV collagens, gelatin, and fish collagen. Scanning electron microscope and atomic force microscope observations combined with biochemical analyses confirmed that myroicolsin exerts a similar action on collagen fiber disassembly as MCP-01. Myroicolsin showed different cleavage patterns on native collagen and denatured collagen. On native collagen, the P1 position is often occupied by Gly, Arg, Pro, or Phe, and the P1′ position is occupied by Gly. On denatured collagen, the P1 position is always a basic residue (Lys and Arg), and the P1′ position is Gly. Ran et al. proposed a collagen degradation model of myroicolsin based on their results (Fig. 3) (66). Myroicolsin could firstly break the interfibrillar proteoglycan bridges, leading to disassembly of the tight structure of collagen fiber and exposure of collagen fibrils. Then, telopeptides at the molecular ends are hydrolyzed by myroicolsin, which leads to the breaking of cross-links between collagen monomers and the release of monomers. Thus, myroicolsin gains access to the attack sites on collagen monomers. Finally, the fibrillar structure of collagen is completely destroyed, and collagen monomers are degraded into peptides and free amino acids (66).

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Schematic model for stepwise collagen degradation by the S8 protease myroicolsin from Myroides profundi D25. Black arrows indicate the collagenolytic process of myroicolsin from collagen fiber to peptides and amino acids. Green arrows indicate the cross-links or bonds destroyed by myroicolsin in each step. Red arrows indicate the cleavage sites of myroicolsin on synthetic peptides. T1, T2, and T3 are the three polypeptide chains in a collagen monomer, and dotted lines indicate the hydrogen bonds between the polypeptide chains in a collagen monomer. (Adapted from reference 66 with permission of the publisher [copyright 2014, the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.]).

Bacterial collagenolytic proteases in the S8 family, including MCP-01, myroicolsin, and the thermostable protease from Geobacillus collagenovorans MO-1, can degrade native type I collagen at 37°C and below, though they have high temperature optima (50 to 60°C). Therefore, these S8 collagenolytic proteases can be regarded as bacterial collagenases.

BACTERIAL SERINE COLLAGENOLYTIC PROTEASES FROM THE S53 FAMILY

Diversity and structure.

The proteases of the S53 family, or the sedolisin family, have been identified recently and found in a wide variety of organisms (12, 68). These enzymes usually exhibit maximum activity at low pH and high temperature. Crystal structures of some members of this family are available, and these adopt a fold that resembles subtilisin but is significantly larger. However, the enzymes of the S53 family have a unique catalytic triad, Ser-Glu-Asp, distinct from that of subtilisin-like proteases (Asp-His-Ser) (68).

Kumamolisin-As, originally named ScpA, is the only known member with collagenolytic activity in the sedolisin family (69). Kumamolisin-As was originally identified in the culture filtrate of a thermoacidophilic soil bacterium, Alicyclobacillus sendaiensis strain NTAP-1 (70, 71). Mature kumamolisin-As contains 361 amino acid residues. Crystal structures of the uninhibited enzyme and its complex with a covalently bound inhibitor, N-acetyl-isoleucyl-prolyl-phenylalaninal, have been solved (72). The catalytic triad is composed of Ser278, Glu78, and Asp82 (Fig. 2). In recent years, the catalytic mechanism of kumamolisin-As has been elucidated by quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical molecular dynamics and free energy simulations and site-directed mutations (7377).

Collagenolytic mechanism.

Specificity analyses showed that kumamolisin-As is highly specific for collagen under thermal and acidic conditions and has maximum collagenolytic activity at pH 4.0 and 60°C (69, 71). Collagen is denatured under these conditions, and thus, kumamolisin-As actually acts on denatured collagen. Because strain NTAP-1 is a thermoacidophilic bacterium (70), collagen should be relaxed under the bacterial growth conditions before proteolysis can occur (71). These analyses suggest that kumamolisin-As may not be a true bacterial collagenase. Structural and docking studies have also shown that a groove that encompasses the active site provides a sufficient space for binding a relaxed collagen molecule and that the negative charges clustered on the surface of this groove facilitate the binding of the positively charged collagen. The low-pH activity of kumamolisin-As may be due to the presence of Asp164 in the oxyanion hole. Kumamolisin-As shows a strong preference for arginine at the P1 position on collagen, due to the presence of a negatively charged residue (Asp179) in the S1 pocket of the enzyme (72).

BACTERIAL COLLAGENOLYTIC PROTEASES FROM THE U32 FAMILY

Diversity and structure.

The U32 family contains several collagenolytic proteases of unknown catalytic type (12). Most of these proteases are the virulence factors of human-pathogenic bacteria. Protease PrtC from Porphyromonas gingivalis ATCC 53977 (which is no longer available from the ATCC) was the first reported and is also the most studied U32 protease (78). The other members of this family are from Helicobacter pylori, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, Clostridium beijerinckii, Escherichia coli, and Bacillus subtilis (7982). The prtC gene from Porphyromonas gingivalis ATCC 53977 contains 1,002 bp and encodes a 333-residue PrtC protein (78). The structure of the 10-kDa C-terminal domain of a putative U32 protease from Geobacillus thermoleovorans has been solved. This C-terminal domain shows a compact distorted open β-barrel made up of eight β-strands and may function in protein binding based on structure similarity analysis (83). If this is true, it can be concluded that the N-terminal domain of U32 proteases should function as a catalytic domain (Fig. 1).

Collagenolytic mechanism.

PrtC degraded soluble and reconstituted fibrillar type I collagen, heat-denatured type I collagen, and azocoll at temperatures below 37°C but not gelatin or the Pz peptide (78). This characteristic indicates that PrtC is likely a true bacterial collagenase. The activity of PrtC was enhanced by Ca2+ and inhibited by EDTA, sulfhydryl-blocking agents, and the salivary peptide histatin (78). The substrate specificity of other U32 proteases has not been characterized in detail. Due to the lack of structural information, the protein fold and active site residues of the catalytic domain for any member of this family are unclear. However, because most U32 proteases are the virulence factors of human-pathogenic bacteria, it is important to understand the structures and collagen degradation mechanisms of these virulent proteases, as such information is helpful for the development of therapies for the diseases caused by relevant pathogenic bacteria.

ROLES IN HUMAN DISEASES AND ENVIRONMENTAL NITROGEN CYCLING AND BIOTECHNOLOGICAL AND MEDICAL APPLICATIONS

Roles in human diseases.

Bacterial collagenolytic proteases from pathogens have been of concern mainly because they are potential virulence factors. The collagenases from several pathogenic Clostridium species are suggested to be involved in the degradation of specific cell membrane or extracellular matrix components, which have been documented in a 2009 review by Popoff and Bouvet (84). The collagenase of Vibrio vulnificus, a pathogen which can cause cellulitis or septicemia, was reported to have a potential contribution to the invasiveness of the bacteria into human tissue through open wounds (85, 86). Many collagenases from Clostridium and Vibrio pathogens are supposed to have similar roles. Some S8 proteases with high collagenolytic activity that are secreted by the pathogens Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (opportunistic agent of hemorrhagic pneumonia) and Acanthamoeba spp. (causative agent of amebic keratitis and granulomatous amebic encephalitis) probably function as important pathogenic factors and may serve as targets for the development of therapeutic agents (6062).

The U32 family collagenolytic proteases from several human pathogens, such as Porphyromonas gingivalis, Aeromonas veronii, and Helicobacter pylori, are also suggested to be virulence factors (78, 81, 87). Although a lot of pathogens are found to secrete collagenolytic proteases, the roles and mechanisms of the proteases involved in their pathogenic processes are still largely unknown. The exploration of the mechanisms of human pathogen collagenolytic proteases on collagen degradation is essential for establishing treatments for related human diseases. More detailed information on bacterial collagenases related to human diseases can be found in a recent review (88).

Roles in environmental nitrogen cycling.

Besides pathogens, a lot of collagenolytic-protease-secreting bacteria have been isolated from terrestrial soil and marine sediments. Thus, it is reasonable to believe that collagen degradation by extracellular collagenolytic proteases from various environmental bacteria is an important biological process for the release of fixed nitrogen into the global nitrogen cycle. It is well known that Clostridium spp. are involved in carcass putrefaction, and their collagenases play obvious roles in this process. Collagenolytic proteases from other environmental bacteria can be supposed to play similar roles in degrading various collagens from dead or even living animals. Revealing the mechanisms of environmental bacteria on collagen degradation is helpful for the study of the global nitrogen cycle. Moreover, bacterial collagenases have shown much biotechnological potential, which is documented in detail in the following section.

Biotechnological and medical applications.

Clostridium collagenase has been used in laboratories to dissociate tissues and isolate cells (89) and used as a therapeutic drug for the removal of necrotic wound tissues for several decades (90, 91). It is successfully applied in the treatment of third-degree burns (92, 93), soft tissue and pressure ulcers (9497), diabetic ulcers (98), ischemic arterial ulcers (99101), and Dupuytren's disease (102). Recently, clostridial collagenases (Xiaflex/Xiapex) were approved by both the FDA (December 2013) and the European Union (February 2015) to be used as nonsurgical treatment for Peyronie's disease. It has been shown that both Clostridium collagenase itself and its collagen degradation products can promote cell migration (103). In addition, the serine collagenolytic protease from Pseudoalteromonas sp. SM9913 has shown good potential in meat taste improvement (104) and meat tenderization (105). These examples indicate that bacterial collagenolytic proteases may have wide applications in research, medicine, and food processing in the future.

SUMMARY AND PROSPECTS

Summary.

Due to their essential role in global nitrogen cycling and/or their vital virulent role in some diseases, bacterial collagenolytic proteases have drawn increasing attention. During the last decade, the intact or partial structures of some bacterial collagenolytic proteases, including ColG, ColH, and ColT from M9, deseasin MCP-01 from S8, and kumamolisin-As from S53, have been solved, and their mechanisms for collagen degradation have been revealed by structural and biochemical studies. Several kinds of noncatalytic domains, including PKD-like domains, PPC domains, and CBDs, are found at the C termini of some bacterial collagenolytic proteases. Unlike PKD-like domains and PPC domains, which are identified by sequence homology, CBD is a functional name of the domains in bacterial collagenolytic proteases that have collagen-binding ability. The CBDs from different bacterial collagenolytic proteases may have little sequence homology. Except for the M9 Vibrio collagenase and the S1 protease SOT, whose cleavage patterns on collagen are similar to those of MMPs, the other bacterial collagenolytic proteases (the M9 Clostridium collagenase, the S8 protease, and the S53 protease) have multiple cleavage sites on collagen and can degrade collagen into small peptides and amino acids. Therefore, these bacterial proteases are very effective at environmental collagen degradation.

With more and more serine collagenolytic proteases being studied, common characteristics of these proteases from different families can be observed. The catalytic domains of serine collagenolytic proteases have activity toward collagen, independently of whether they have a collagen-binding domain. Serine collagenolytic proteases have an enlarged and negatively charged substrate-binding pocket for collagen recognition compared to their homologs that have no collagenolytic activity. Serine collagenolytic proteases usually have a preference for basic residues at the P1 position on collagen. The basic residue Arg is abundant in human collagens. The numbers of Arg residues in the sequences of chains α1 and α2 of human type I collagen are 71/1,464 and 72/1,366, respectively, and the numbers of Arg residues in the sequences of subunits α1 to α6 of collagen IV are 45/1,669, 79/1,721, 65/1,672, 70/1,690, 37/1,685, and 47/1,691, respectively. The peptide bonds with a C-terminal Arg residue in human collagens are all potential cleavage sites for serine collagenolytic proteases with a strong specificity for Arg at P1.

Prospects.

It is most likely that there are still many undiscovered bacterial collagenolytic proteases hidden in various environmental or pathogenic bacteria. Some of these proteases may have novel structures and collagenolytic mechanisms. The exploration of these proteases could provide further understanding of bacterial degradation of collagen globally and could uncover promising proteases with biotechnological potential. In addition, understanding the structures and collagen degradation mechanisms of the collagenolytic proteases from human pathogens, such as Vibrio proteases and the U32 proteases, will be helpful for the development of therapies for the diseases caused by relevant pathogenic bacteria.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 31290230, 31290231, 91228210, and 41276149), the Hi-Tech Research and Development Program of China (grant 2014AA093509), and the China Ocean Mineral Resources R & D Association (COMRA) Special Foundation (grant DY125-15-T-05).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Ricard-Blum S. 2011. The collagen family. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 3:a004978. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a004978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gordon MK, Hahn RA. 2010. Collagens. Cell Tissue Res 339:247–257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Khoshnoodi J, Pedchenko V, Hudson BG. 2008. Mammalian collagen IV. Microsc Res Tech 71:357–370. doi: 10.1002/jemt.20564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ricard-Blum S, Ruggiero F. 2005. The collagen superfamily: from the extracellular matrix to the cell membrane. Pathol Biol (Paris) 53:430–442. doi: 10.1016/j.patbio.2004.12.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Khoshnoodi J, Cartailler JP, Alvares K, Veis A, Hudson BG. 2006. Molecular recognition in the assembly of collagens: terminal noncollagenous domains are key recognition modules in the formation of triple helical protomers. J Biol Chem 281:38117–38121. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R600025200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kadler KE, Holmes DF, Trotter JA, Chapman JA. 1996. Collagen fibril formation. Biochem J 316:1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Brodsky B, Persikov AV. 2005. Molecular structure of the collagen triple helix. Adv Protein Chem 70:301–339. doi: 10.1016/S0065-3233(05)70009-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kadler KE, Baldock C, Bella J, Boot-Handford RP. 2007. Collagens at a glance. J Cell Sci 120:1955–1958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Visse R, Nagase H. 2003. Matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases: structure, function, and biochemistry. Circ Res 92:827–839. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000070112.80711.3D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lauer-Fields JL, Juska D, Fields GB. 2002. Matrix metalloproteinases and collagen catabolism. Biopolymers 66:19–32. doi: 10.1002/bip.10201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fields GB. 2013. Interstitial collagen catabolism. J Biol Chem 288:8785–8793. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R113.451211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rawlings ND, Barrett AJ, Bateman A. 2010. MEROPS: the peptidase database. Nucleic Acids Res 38:D227–D233. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Harrington DJ. 1996. Bacterial collagenases and collagen-degrading enzymes and their potential role in human disease. Infect Immun 64:1885–1891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.MacLennan JD, Mandl I, Howes EL. 1953. Bacterial digestion of collagen. J Clin Invest 32:1317–1322. doi: 10.1172/JCI102860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yoshida E, Noda H. 1965. Isolation and characterization of collagenases I and II from Clostridium histolyticum. Biochim Biophys Acta 105:562–574. doi: 10.1016/S0926-6593(65)80239-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yoshihara K, Matsushita O, Minami J, Okabe A. 1994. Cloning and nucleotide sequence analysis of the colH gene from Clostridium histolyticum encoding a collagenase and a gelatinase. J Bacteriol 176:6489–6496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Matsushita O, Jung CM, Katayama S, Minami J, Takahashi Y, Okabe A. 1999. Gene duplication and multiplicity of collagenases in Clostridium histolyticum. J Bacteriol 181:923–933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Matsushita O, Yoshihara K, Katayama S, Minami J, Okabe A. 1994. Purification and characterization of a Clostridium perfringens 120-kilodalton collagenase and nucleotide sequence of the corresponding gene. J Bacteriol 176:149–156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Brüggemann H, Baumer S, Fricke WF, Wiezer A, Liesegang H, Decker I, Herzberg C, Martinez-Arias R, Merkl R, Henne A, Gottschalk G. 2003. The genome sequence of Clostridium tetani, the causative agent of tetanus disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:1316–1321. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0335853100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Eckhard U, Schönauer E, Nüss D, Brandstetter H. 2011. Structure of collagenase G reveals a chew-and-digest mechanism of bacterial collagenolysis. Nat Struct Mol Biol 18:1109–1114. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Eckhard U, Schönauer E, Brandstetter H. 2013. Structural basis for activity regulation and substrate preference of clostridial collagenases G, H, and T. J Biol Chem 288:20184–20194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Eckhard U, Brandstetter H. 2011. Polycystic kidney disease-like domains of clostridial collagenases and their role in collagen recruitment. Biol Chem 392:1039–1045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bauer R, Janowska K, Taylor K, Jordan B, Gann S, Janowski T, Latimer EC, Matsushita O, Sakon J. 2015. Structures of three polycystic kidney disease-like domains from Clostridium histolyticum collagenases ColG and ColH. Acta Cryst D 71:565–577. doi: 10.1107/S1399004714027722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wilson JJ, Matsushita O, Okabe A, Sakon J. 2003. A bacterial collagen-binding domain with novel calcium-binding motif controls domain orientation. EMBO J 22:1743–1752. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bauer R, Wilson JJ, Philominathan STL, Davis D, Matsushita O, Sakon J. 2013. Structural comparison of ColH and ColG collagen-binding domains from Clostridium histolyticum. J Bacteriol 195:318–327. doi: 10.1128/JB.00010-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mallya SK, Mookhtiar KA, Van Wart HE. 1986. Accurate quantitative assays for the hydrolysis of soluble type I, II and III 3H-acetylated collagens by bacterial and tissue collagenases. Anal Biochem 158:334–345. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(86)90558-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.French MF, Bhown A, Van Wart HE. 1992. Identification of Clostridium histolyticum collagenase hyperreactive sites in type I, II, and III collagens: lack of correlation with local triple helical stability. J Protein Chem 11:83–97. doi: 10.1007/BF01025095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mookhtiar KA, Steinbrink DR, Van Wart HE. 1985. Mode of hydrolysis of collagen-like peptides by class I and class II Clostridium histolyticum collagenases: evidence for both endopeptidase and tripeptidylcarboxypeptidase activities. Biochemistry 24:6527–6533. doi: 10.1021/bi00344a033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Van Wart HE, Steinbrink DR. 1985. Complementary substrate specificities of class I and class II collagenases from Clostridium histolyticum. Biochemistry 24:6520–6526. doi: 10.1021/bi00344a032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Van Wart HE. 2004. Clostridium collagenase, p 416–419. In Barrett AJ, Rawlings ND, Woessner JF (ed), Handbook of proteolytic enzymes, 2nd ed Elsevier, London, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hu Y, Webb E, Singh J, Morgan BA, Gainor JA, Gordon TD, Siahaan TJ. 2002. Rapid determination of substrate specificity of Clostridium histolyticum β-collagenase using an immobilized peptide library. J Biol Chem 277:8366–8371. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111042200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Eckhard U, Huesgen PF, Brandstetter H, Overall CM. 2014. Proteomic protease specificity profiling of clostridial collagenases reveals their intrinsic nature as dedicated degraders of collagen. J Proteomics 100:102–114. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2013.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.French MF, Mookhtiar KA, Van Wart HE. 1987. Limited proteolysis of type I collagen at hyperreactive sites by class I and II Clostridium histolyticum collagenases: complementary digestion patterns. Biochemistry 26:681–687. doi: 10.1021/bi00377a004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Breite AG, McCarthy RC, Dwulet FE. 2011. Characterization and functional assessment of Clostridium histolyticum class I (C1) collagenases and the synergistic degradation of native collagen in enzyme mixtures containing class II (C2) collagenase. Transplant Proc 43:3171–3175. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.09.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Shinoda S, Miyoshi S. 2011. Proteases produced by vibrios. Biocontrol Sci 16:1–11. doi: 10.4265/bio.16.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kim SK, Yang JY, Cha J. 2002. Cloning and sequence analysis of a novel metalloprotease gene from Vibrio parahaemolyticus 04. Gene 283:277–286. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(01)00882-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lee JH, Kim GT, Lee JY, Jun HK, Yu JH, Kong IS. 1998. Isolation and sequence analysis of metalloprotease gene from Vibrio mimicus. Biochim Biophys Acta 1384:1–6. doi: 10.1016/S0167-4838(97)00205-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lee CY, Su SC, Liaw RB. 1995. Molecular analysis of an extracellular protease gene from Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Microbiology 141:2569–2576. doi: 10.1099/13500872-141-10-2569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Takeuchi H, Shibano Y, Morihara K, Fukushima J, Inami S, Keil B, Gilles AM, Kawamoto S, Okuda K. 1992. Structural gene and complete amino acid sequence of Vibrio alginolyticus collagenase. Biochem J 281:703–708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Luan X, Chen J, Zhang XH, Li Y, Hu G. 2007. Expression and characterization of a metalloprotease from a Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolate. Can J Microbiol 53:1168–1173. doi: 10.1139/W07-085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hickman FW, Farmer JJ, Hollis DG, Fanning GR, Steigerwalt AG, Weaver RE, Brenner DJ. 1982. Identification of Vibrio hollisae sp. nov. from patients with diarrhea. J Clin Microbiol 15:395–401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Thompson FL, Hoste B, Vandemeulebroecke K, Swings J. 2003. Reclassification of Vibrio hollisae as Grimontia hollisae gen. nov., comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53:1615–1617. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02660-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Teramura N, Tanaka K, Iijima K, Hayashida O, Suzuki K, Hattori S, Irie S. 2011. Cloning of a novel collagenase gene from the Gram-negative bacterium Grimontia (Vibrio) hollisae 1706B and its efficient expression in Brevibacillus choshinensis. J Bacteriol 193:3049–3056. doi: 10.1128/JB.01528-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lecroisey A, Keil-Dlouha V, Woods DR, Perrin D, Keil B. 1975. Purification, stability and inhibition of the collagenase from Achromobacter iophagus. FEBS Lett 59:167–172. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(75)80367-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lecroisey A, Keil B. 1979. Differences in the degradation of native collagen by two microbial collagenases. Biochem J 179:53–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lee JH, Ahn SH, Lee EM, Jeong SH, Kim YO, Lee SJ, Kong IS. 2005. The FAXWXXT motif in the carboxyl terminus of Vibrio mimicus metalloprotease is involved in binding to collagen. FEBS Lett 579:2507–2513. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.03.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Perona JJ, Tsu CA, Craik CS, Fletterick RJ. 1997. Crystal structure of an ecotin-collagenase complex suggests a model for recognition and cleavage of the collagen triple helix. Biochemistry 36:5381–5392. doi: 10.1021/bi9617522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Tsu CA, Perona JJ, Fletterick RJ, Craik CS. 1997. Structural basis for the broad substrate specificity of fiddler crab collagenolytic serine protease 1. Biochemistry 36:5393–5401. doi: 10.1021/bi961753u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kim JC, Cha SH, Jeong ST, Oh SK, Byun SM. 1991. Molecular cloning and nucleotide sequence of Streptomyces griseus trypsin gene. Biochem J Biophys Res Commun 181:707–713. doi: 10.1016/0006-291X(91)91248-B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Uesugi Y, Arima J, Usuki H, Iwabuchi M, Hatanaka T. 2008. Two bacterial collagenolytic serine proteases have different topological specificities. Biochim Biophys Acta 1784:716–726. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2008.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Rawlings ND, Barrett AJ. 2004. Introduction: serine peptides and their clans, p 1425–1427. In Barrett AJ, Rawlings ND, Woessner JF (ed), Handbook of proteolytic enzymes, 2nd ed Elsevier, London, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Okamoto M, Yonejima Y, Tsujimoto Y, Suzuki Y, Watanabe K. 2001. A thermostable collagenolytic protease with a very large molecular mass produced by thermophilic Bacillus sp. strain MO-1. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 57:103–108. doi: 10.1007/s002530100731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Itoi Y, Horinaka M, Tsujimoto Y, Matsui H, Watanabe K. 2006. Characteristic features in the structure and collagen-binding ability of a thermophilic collagenolytic protease from the thermophile Geobacillus collagenovorans MO-1. J Bacteriol 188:6572–6579. doi: 10.1128/JB.00767-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Petrova DH, Shishkov SA, Vlahov SS. 2006. Novel thermostable serine collagenase from Thermoactinomyces sp. 21E: purification and some properties. J Basic Microbiol 46:275–285. doi: 10.1002/jobm.200510063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Catara G, Ruggiero G, La Cara F, Digilio FA, Capasso A, Rossi M. 2003. A novel extracellular subtilisin-like protease from the hyperthermophile Aeropyrum pernix K1: biochemical properties, cloning, and expression. Extremophiles 7:391–399. doi: 10.1007/s00792-003-0337-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ohara T, Makino K, Shinagawa H, Nakata A, Norioka S, Sakiyama F. 1989. Cloning, nucleotide sequence, and expression of Achromobacter protease I gene. J Biol Chem 264:20625–20631. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Jang H, Kim B, Pyun Y, Kim Y. 2002. A novel subtilisin-like serine protease from Thermoanaerobacter yonseiensis KB-1: its cloning, expression, and biochemical properties. Extremophiles 6:233–243. doi: 10.1007/s00792-001-0248-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Wan MY, Wang HY, Zhang YZ, Feng H. 2009. Substrate specificity and thermostability of the dehairing alkaline protease from Bacillus pumilus. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 159:394–403. doi: 10.1007/s12010-008-8497-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kurata A, Uchimura K, Shimamura S, Kobayashi T, Horikoshi K. 2007. Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences of a subtilisin-like serine protease from a deep-sea bacterium, Alkalimonas collagenimarina AC40T. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 77:311–319. doi: 10.1007/s00253-007-1164-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Windhorst S, Frank E, Georgieva DN, Genov N, Buck F, Borowski P, Weber W. 2002. The major extracellular protease of the nosocomial pathogen Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: characterization of the protein and molecular cloning of the gene. J Biol Chem 277:11042–11049. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109525200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kim HK, Ha YR, Yu HS, Kong HH, Chung DI. 2003. Purification and characterization of a 33 kDa serine protease from Acanthamoeba lugdunensis KA/E2 isolated from a Korean keratitis patient. Korean J Parasitol 41:189–196. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2003.41.4.189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kim WT, Kong HH, Ha YR, Hong YC, Jeong HJ, Yu HS, Chung DI. 2006. Comparison of specific activity and cytopathic effects of purified 33 kDa serine proteinase from Acanthamoeba strains with different degree of virulence. Korean J Parasitol 44:321–330. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2006.44.4.321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Zhao GY, Chen XL, Zhao HL, Xie BB, Zhou BC, Zhang YZ. 2008. Hydrolysis of insoluble collagen by deseasin MCP-01 from deep-sea Pseudoalteromonas sp. SM9913: collagenolytic characters, collagen-binding ability of C-terminal polycystic kidney disease domain, and implication for its novel role in deep-sea sedimentary particulate organic nitrogen degradation. J Biol Chem 283:36100–36107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Wang YK, Zhao GY, Li Y, Chen XL, Xie BB, Su HN, Zhang YZ. 2010. Mechanistic insight into the function of the C-terminal PKD domain of the collagenolytic serine protease deseasin MCP-01 from deep sea Pseudoalteromonas sp. SM9913: binding of the PKD domain to collagen results in collagen swelling but does not unwind the collagen triple helix. J Biol Chem 285:14285–14291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Ran LY, Su HN, Zhao GY, Gao X, Zhou MY, Wang P, Zhao HL, Xie BB, Zhang XY, Chen XL, Zhang YZ. 2013. Structural and mechanistic insights into collagen degradation by a bacterial collagenolytic serine protease in the subtilisin family. Mol Microbiol 90:997–1010. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Ran LY, Su HN, Zhou MY, Wang L, Chen XL, Zhang XY, Xie B-B, Song XY, Shi M, Qin QL, Zhou BC, Zhang YZ. 2014. Characterization of a novel subtilisin-like protease myroicolsin from deep-sea bacterium Myroides profundi D25 and molecular insight into its collagenolytic mechanism. J Biol Chem 289:6041–6053. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.513861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Chen XL, Xie BB, Lu JT, He HL, Zhang YZ. 2007. A novel type of subtilase from the psychrotolerant bacterium Pseudoalteromonas sp. SM9913: catalytic and structural properties of deseasin MCP-01. Microbiology 153:2116–2125. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2007/006056-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Wlodawer A, Li M, Gustchin A, Oyama H, Dunn BM, Oda K. 2003. Structural and enzymatic properties of the sedolisin family of serine-carboxyl peptidases. Acta Biochim Pol 50:81–102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Tsuruoka N, Nakayama T, Ashida M, Hemmi H, Nakao M, Minakata H, Oyama H, Oda K, Nishino T. 2003. Collagenolytic serine-carboxyl proteinase from Alicyclobacillus sendaiensis strain NTAP-1: purification, characterization, gene cloning, and heterologous expression. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:162–169. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.1.162-169.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Tsuruoka N, Isono Y, Shida O, Hemmi H, Nakayama T, Nishino T. 2003. Alicyclobacillus sendaiensis sp. nov., a novel acidophilic, slightly thermophilic species isolated from soil in Sendai, Japan. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53:1081–1084. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02409-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Nakayama T, Tsuruoka N, Akai M, Nishino T. 2000. Thermostable collagenolytic activity of a novel thermophilic isolate, Bacillus sp. strain NTAP-1. J Biosci Bioeng 89:612–614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Wlodawer A, Li M, Gustchina A, Tsuruoka N, Ashida M, Minakata H, Oyama H, Oda K, Nishino T, Nakayama T. 2004. Crystallographic and biochemical investigations of kumamolisin-As, a serine-carboxyl peptidase with collagenase activity. J Biol Chem 279:21500–21510. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M401141200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Guo H, Wlodawer A, Guo H. 2005. A general acid-base mechanism for the stabilization of a tetrahedral adduct in a serine-carboxyl peptidase: a computational study. J Am Chem Soc 127:15662–15663. doi: 10.1021/ja0520565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Okubo A, Li M, Ashida M, Oyama H, Gustchina A, Oda K, Dunn BM, Wlodawer A, Nakayama T. 2006. Processing, catalytic activity and crystal structures of kumamolisin-As with an engineered active site. FEBS J 273:2563–2576. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05266.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Guo H, Wlodawer A, Nakayama T, Xu Q, Guo H. 2006. Catalytic role of proton transfers in the formation of a tetrahedral adduct in a serine carboxyl peptidase. Biochemistry 45:9129–9137. doi: 10.1021/bi060461i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Xu Q, Guo HB, Wlodawer A, Nakayama T, Guo H. 2007. The QM/MM molecular dynamics and free energy simulations of the acylation reaction catalyzed by the serine-carboxyl peptidase kumamolisin-As. Biochemistry 46:3784–3792. doi: 10.1021/bi061737p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Xu Q, Li L, Guo H. 2010. Understanding the mechanism of deacylation reaction catalyzed by the serine carboxyl peptidase kumamolisin-As: insights from QM/MM free energy simulations. J Phys Chem B 114:10594–10600. doi: 10.1021/jp102785s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Kato T, Takahashi N, Kuramitsu HK. 1992. Sequence analysis and characterization of the Porphyromonas gingivalis prtC gene, which expresses a novel collagenase activity. J Bacteriol 174:3889–3895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Carlson SA, McCuddin ZP, Wu MT. 2005. SlyA regulates the collagenase-mediated cytopathic phenotype in multiresistant Salmonella. Microb Pathog 38:181–187. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2005.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Wu Q, Li C, Li C, Chen H, Shuliang L. 2010. Purification and characterization of a novel collagenase from Bacillus pumilus Col-J. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 160:129–139. doi: 10.1007/s12010-009-8673-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Han HJ, Taki T, Kondo H, Hirono I, Aoki T. 2008. Pathogenic potential of a collagenase gene from Aeromonas veronii. Can J Microbiol 54:1–10. doi: 10.1139/W07-109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Xiong N, Brewer MT, Anderson KL, Weeks KE, Carlson SA. 2011. Expression of a collagenase that enables blood-brain barrier penetration for Salmonella implicated in bovine encephalopathies. Microb Pathog 51:230–232. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2011.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Trillo-Muyo S, Jasilionis A, Domagalski MJ, Chruszcz M, Minor W, Kuisiene N, Arolas JL, Solà M, Gomis-Rüth FX. 2013. Ultratight crystal packing of a 10 kDa protein. Biol Crystal 69:464–470. doi: 10.1107/S0907444912050135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Popoff MR, Bouvet P. 2009. Clostridial toxins. Future Microbiol 4:1021–1064. doi: 10.2217/fmb.09.72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Smith GC, Merkel JR. 1982. Collagenolytic activity of Vibrio vulnificus: potential contribution to its invasiveness. Infect Immun 35:1155–1156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Miyoshi N, Shimizu C, Miyoshi S-I, Shinoda S. 1987. Purification and characterization of Vibrio vulnificus protease. Microbiol Immunol 31:13–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1987.tb03064.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Kavermann H, Burns BP, Angermüller K, Odenbreit S, Fischer W, Melchers K, Haas R. 2003. Identification and characterization of Helicobacter pylori genes essential for gastric colonization. J Exp Med 197:813–822. doi: 10.1084/jem.20021531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Duarte AS, Correia A, Esteves AC. 2014. Bacterial collagenases—a review. Crit Rev Microbiol doi: 10.3109/1040841X.2014.904270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Suggs W, Van WH, Sharefkin JB. 1992. Enzymatic harvesting of adult human saphenous vein endothelial cells: use of a chemically defined combination of two purified enzymes to attain viable cell yields equal to those attained by crude bacterial collagenase preparations. J Vasc Surg 15:205–213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Mandl I. 1972. Collagenase comes of age, p 1–16. In Mandl I. (ed), Collagenase. Gordon & Breach Science Publishers, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Mandl I. 1982. Bacterial collagenases and their clinical applications. Arzneimittelforschung 32:1381–1384. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Vrabec R, Moserova J, Konickova Z, Behounkova E, Blaha J. 1974. Clinical experience with enzymatic debridement of burned skin with the use of collagenase. J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol 18:496–498. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Hansbrough JF, Achauer B, Dawson J, Himel H, Luterman A, Slater H, Levenson S, Salzberg CA, Hansbrough WB, Dore C. 1995. Wound healing in partial-thickness burn wounds treated with collagenase ointment versus silver sulfadiazine cream. J Burn Care Rehabil 16:241–247. doi: 10.1097/00004630-199505000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Varma AO, Bugatch E, German FM. 1973. Debridement of dermal ulcers with collagenase. Surg Gynecol Obstet 136:281–282. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Lee LK, Ambrus JL. 1975. Collagenase therapy for decubitus ulcers. Geriatrics 30:91–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Vetra H, Whittaker D. 1975. Hydrotherapy and topical collagenase for decubitus ulcers. Geriatrics 30:53–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Rao DB, Sane PG, Georgiev EL. 1975. Collagenase in the treatment of dermal and decubitus ulcers. J Am Geriatr Soc 23:22–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1975.tb00376.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Altman MI, Goldstein L, Horowitz S. 1978. Collagenase: an adjunct to healing trophic ulcerations in the diabetic patient. J Am Podiatry Assoc 68:11–15. doi: 10.7547/87507315-68-1-11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Boxer AM, Gottesman N, Bernstein H, Mandl I. 1969. Debridement of dermal ulcers and decubiti with collagenase. Geriatrics 24:75–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Záruba F, Lettl A, Brozkova L, Skrdlantova H, Krs V. 1974. Collagenase in the treatment of ulcers in dermatology. J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol 18:499–500. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Haimovici H, Strauch B. 1972. Use of collagenase in the management of stasis and ischemic ulcers of the lower extremities, p 177–183. In Mandl I. (ed), Collagenase. Gordon & Breach Science Publishers, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Badalamente MA, Hurst LC. 2000. Enzyme injection as nonsurgical treatment of Dupuytren's disease. J Hand Surg Am 25:629–636. doi: 10.1053/jhsu.2000.6918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Shi L, Ermis R, Garcia A, Telgenhoff D, Aust D. 2010. Degradation of human collagen isoforms by Clostridium collagenase and the effects of degradation products on cell migration. Int Wound J 7:87–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2010.00659.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.He HL, Chen XL, Li JW, Zhang YZ, Gao PJ. 2004. Taste improvement of refrigerated meat treated with cold-adapted protease. Food Chem 84:307–311. [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Zhao GY, Zhou MY, Zhao HL, Chen XL, Xie BB, Zhang XY, He HL, Zhou BC, Zhang YZ. 2012. Tenderization effect of cold-adapted collagenolytic protease MCP-01 on beef meat at low temperature and its mechanism. Food Chem 134:1738–1744. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.03.118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES