Abstract
Actinomycosis is a rare chronic infection caused by species of Actinomyces and characterised by abscess formation, tissue fibrosis, suppurative lesions and fistulas with purulent discharge containing sulphur granules. Owing to its multiform manners of presentation and non-specificity from its clinical features, it has been considered as a challenging diagnosis. Periapical actinomycosis is one of the rarest forms of actinomycosis occurring in the maxillofacial region. In its occurrence it presents in the form of persistent and recurrent draining fistula in the periapical region. We report a case of periapical actinomycosis occurred in endodontically treated teeth and accidentally found to be actinomycosis during histopatological examination. An insight towards the portal of entry of the organisms into the periapical region is also discussed. The practice of sending even a tiny bit of tissues to histopathology obtained from periapical surgery will very well demonstrate this disease and help in rapid resolution through appropriate antibiotic therapy.
Background
Actinomycosis is a rare chronic infection caused by species of Actinomyces and characterised by abscess formation, tissue fibrosis, suppurative lesions and fistulas with purulent discharge containing sulphur granules. Owing to its multiform manners of presentation and non-specificity from its clinical features, it has been considered as a challenging diagnosis. Periapical actinomycosis is one of the rarest forms of actinomycosis occurring in the maxillofacial region. In its occurrence it presents in the form of persistent and recurrent draining fistula in the periapical region.
We report a case of periapical actinomycosis occurred in endodontically treated teeth and accidentally found to be actinomycosis during histopatological examination. An insight towards the portal of entry of the organisms into the periapical region is also discussed.
Case presentation
A 30-year-old gentleman, with pain and pus discharge in the periapical region of lower central incisors persisting for 3 months, reported to our department. He underwent endodontic treatment 1 year before in both the lower central incisors in a different hospital. Intraoral examination revealed discoloured mandibular central incisors (figure 1) along with presence of sinus in the periapical region. Pus drainage was also noted through the sinus tract. Tenderness on percussion was present in both the central incisors.
Figure 1.
Discoloured mandibular central incisors.
An intraoral periapical radiograph was taken and it showed a 1×2 cm diffuse irregular radiolucency in the periapical region of both mandibular central and lateral incisors (figure 2). Teeth vitality test was carried out that showed both the lateral incisors to be vital. A provisional diagnosis of infected periapical granuloma was made.
Figure 2.

Radiograph showing diffuse irregular periapical radiolucency.
As the radiograph reveals satisfactory obturation in both the central incisors periapical surgery was planned. Since the patient had draining sinus, it was decided to advise him empiric antibiotic therapy of amoxicillin 500 mg, 8 h for 5 days. The surgery included periapical curettage and apicoetomy in both the central incisors. During surgery, excessive destruction of bone especially in between the buccal and the lingual cortex noted and a mass of dirty white necrotic material was found and curetted that is quite unusual in routine periapical surgery. Curetted soft tissues were sent for histopathology examination.
Investigations
Postoperative examination of the specimen revealed multiple greyish white to greyish brown soft tissue bits amounting to 1 gm. Microscopically, sections showed granulation tissue with foci of necrotic acellular material with bacterial colonies. The background showed fragments of squamous epithelium and bone. The necrotic material is bordered by pinkish eosinophilic material (figure 3). The Splendore-Hoeppli phenomenon (asteroid bodies) is found, which is the in vivo formation of intensely eosinophilic material (radiate, star-like, asteroid or club-shaped configurations) around microorganisms (fungi, bacteria and parasites) or biologically inert substances (figure 4).
Figure 3.
H&E stain: foci of necrotic acellular material with bacterial colonies (×40).
Figure 4.
Splendore-Hoeppli phenomenon (×40).
On the basis of these presentations, actinomycosis was suspected and periodic acid Schiff (PAS) stain was done which clearly demonstrated multiple actinomycotic colonies (figure 5). Gram Brown-Brenn stain was also done and showed clusters of radiated, filamentous, branching, Gram-positive actinomyces microorganisms (figure 6). Gomori methenamine-silver nitrate stain demonstrated sulphur granules in the microbial colonies (figure 7). Acid-fast staining was negative which can be used to distinguish Actinomyces spp., which are acid-fast negative, from Nocardia spp., which are variably acid-fast positive (figure 8).
Figure 5.
Periodic acid Schiff stain: multiple actinomycotic colonies (×40).
Figure 6.
Gram Brown-Brenn stain: clusters of radiated, filamentous, branching, Gram-positive actinomyces microorganisms (×40).
Figure 7.
Gomori methenamine-silver nitrate stain: sulphur granules (×40).
Figure 8.
Acid-fast stain: negative (×40).
Differential diagnosis
Peripapical abscess, periapical granuloma and periapical cyst.
Outcome and follow-up
A follow-up radiograph taken after 3 months showed healing bone defect (figure 9).
Figure 9.

Follow-up radiograph: healing bone defect.
Discussion
Actinomyces spp. are normal commensals of the human oropharynx, gastrointestinal tract and genitourinary tract. Six of 14 species have been implicated to be pathogenic in humans.1–3 Actinomyces israelli is most commonly incriminated in human disease.4 Since actinomycosis is a chronic, suppurative and granulomatous infection caused by anaerobic Gram-positive bacilli, it requires implantation into deep tissues. Puncture wounds, compound fractures and dental extractions are some of the possible routes of infection. The incidence of actinomycosis in cervicofacial is 55%, followed by 20% in abdominopelvic, 15% in thoracic and 10% in mixed organs, including skin, brain, pericardium and extremities.1–3 5
Cervicofacial actinomycosis is further classified into central and peripheral types, of which the central variety is very rare in nature with the incidence of 1–2%.6 Periapical actinomycosis falls under central type which itself is very uncommon among central varieties.7
There is dearth of literature supporting the mode of entry of actinomycosis into the periapical region. However, it is believed that during root canal treatment the organisms are displaced from the oral cavity to the periapical region. Since majority of actinomycosis cases reported in the literature till date occurred in edodontically treated teeth which is in accordance with the above-mentioned hypothesis.7–10 Entry of these organisms through the periodontium can also be suspected, but in our case the gingival and the periodontal regions were apparently normal both clinically and radiologically. Another route of entry is endogenous in nature, which cannot be ruled out in all the cases. The belief that infection may be from endogenous sources is further confirmed by the fact that A israelli has never been demonstrated in soil, plants or any other object outside the body.11
In our case amoxicillin was administered (500 mg orally every 8 h) for 2 weeks and the symptoms subsided uneventfully. Actinomyces israelli is sensitive to antibiotics that are effective against Gram-positive organisms such as penicillin, sulphonamides, streptomycin, tetracyclines, erythromycin and rifampicin, but high doses of long-term penicillin is the treatment of choice.12 13 A follow-up radiograph taken after 3 months showed healing bone defect (figure 9).
Learning points.
Owing to its multiform manners of presentation and non-specificity from its clinical features, periapical actinomysis has been considered a challenging diagnosis.
Periapical actinomycosis although rare should be included in the list of periapical pathology.
Successful diagnosis and management of this case reaffirm the importance of examining every bit of tissue recovered from a lesion.
Footnotes
Competing interest: None.
Patient consent: Obtained.
References
- 1.Smego RA, Foglia G. Actinomycosis. Clin Infect Dis 1998;26:1255–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bennhoff DF. Actinomycosis: diagnostic and therapeutic considerations and a review of 32 cases. Laryngoscope 1984;94:1198–217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Brown JR. Human actinomycosis: a study of 181 subjects. Hum Pathol 1973;4:319–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mabeza GF, Macfarlane J. Pulmonary actinomyosis. Eur Respir J 2003;21:545–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Weese WC, Smith IM. A study of 57 cases of actinomycosis over a 36-year period. A diagnostic ‘failure’ with good prognosis after treatment. Arch Intern Med 1975;135:1562–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lancella A, Abbate G, Foscolo AM, et al. Two unusual presentations of cervicofacial actinomycosis and review of the literature. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2008;28:89–93. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jeansonne BG. Periapical actinomycosis: a review. Quintessence Int 2005;36:149–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ricucci D, Siqueira JF., Jr Apical actinomycosis as a continuum of intraradicular and extraradicular infection: case report and critical review on its involvement with treatment failure. J Endod 2008;34:1124–9. Epub 2008 Jul 24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hirshberg A, Tsesis I, Metzger Z, et al. Periapical actinomycosis: a clinicopathologic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;95:614–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Oppenheimer S, Miller GS, Knopf K, et al. Periapical actinomycosis. An unusual case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1978;46:101–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mehta V, Balachandran C. Primary cutaneous actinomycosis on the chest wall. Dermatol Online J 2008;14:13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Warren NG. Actinomycosis, nocardiosis, and actinomycetoma. Dermatol Clin 1996;14(1):85–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sudhakar SS, Ross JJ. Short-term treatment of actinomycosis: two cases and a review. Clin Infect Dis 2004;38:444–7. (ISSN: 1537-6591). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]







