Abstract
We discuss an 18-year-old girl, diagnosed with tuberous sclerosis complex and known to have renal angiomyolipomas (AMLs) but having no regular urological follow-up, who presented with left-sided abdominal pain and haematuria on urine dipstick testing at the out-of-hours General Practitioner (GP) service. She was diagnosed as having urinary tract infection/pyelonephritis and discharged with simple analgesia and antibiotics. Subsequent imaging of her renal tract demonstrated multiple large AMLs with evidence of recent bleeding, which required arterial embolisation.
Background
In patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), apparently innocent urinary tract infection (UTI)/pyelonephritis/ureteric colic-like symptoms may in fact belie a more serious pathology. Angiomyolipomas (AMLs), rare in the general population, are common in patients with TSC and can lead to potentially life-threatening haemorrhage. These patients should be monitored closely with regular imaging and urological follow-up. Moreover, such patients with acute symptoms should be considered for urgent radiological investigation, preferably as inpatients, and be reviewed by a urology team.
Case presentation
We present an 18-year-old girl, known to have tuberous sclerosis, referred to our urology outpatient department by her GP. One month before, she had presented to the out-of-hours GP service with left-sided abdominal pain and was found to have haematuria on urine dipstick testing. She was discharged at that time with simple analgesia and antibiotics for a suspected urinary tract infection/pyelonephritis. Her GP arranged an ultrasound, prior to her outpatient appointment, which showed a 5.5 cm lesion in her right kidney and an 8.9 cm lesion in her left, both of which had appearances consistent with AMLs.
Diagnosed at age 6 with TSC following a referral to a dermatologist for skin lesions from birth (ash leaf macules and angiofibromas), she was being managed on Lamotrigine for epilepsy but was otherwise well, studying at college. A screening renal tract ultrasound soon after diagnosis was found to be normal, but a subsequent routine scan at age 12 showed multiple small AMLs. Despite the identification of these AMLs, her next ultrasound was 4 years later. This ultrasound at age 16 demonstrated a 5.5 cm AML; however, she had no further imaging arranged and was only seen by a Urologist following acute presentation 2 years later.
Investigations
An urgent CT scan was arranged at the time of her outpatients appointment (figures 1 and 2), which demonstrated various lesions in the right kidney (the largest of which measured 52×60×58 mm) and two large lesions in the left kidney (73×42×74 and 43×28×40 mm), one of which appeared to have a feeding artery, showing evidence of a recent bleed.
Figure 1.

Axial CT scan, highlighting a lesion in the left kidney with mixed attenuation.
Figure 2.

Coronal CT scan demonstrating anatomical distortion of both kidneys by large lesions, again showing mixed attenuation.
Treatment
This particular lesion in her left kidney was thought to be the source of her symptoms and so she underwent arterial embolisation to that AML (figures 3 and 4). The procedure was performed successfully, with no immediate complications.
Figure 3.

Radiograph pre-embolisation showing disorganised vasculature of the left AML with tiny aneurysmal-like lesions.
Figure 4.

Radiograph postembolisation showing reduced vascular flow in the AML.
Outcome and follow-up
She has since had no further loin pain or bleeding and is being discussed at our multidisciplinary team meetings with regard to her remaining lesions. She is due for a DMSA scan to assess renal function to inform further nephron-sparing management decision.
Discussion
TSC is a rare autosomal dominant neurocutaneous condition (though 60–70% of cases are sporadic) leading to the growth of non-malignant congenital tumours in the brain, kidneys, heart, eyes, lung and skin, occurring in around 1 in 6000 to 1 in 12 000.1 It is caused by mutations in either the TSC1 gene (chromosome 9q34) coding the protein harmatin or the TSC2 gene (chromosome 16p13) coding the protein tuberin.2 These proteins are involved in regulating cell cycle progression including apoptosis via the mTOR pathway. As such, mutations in these two proteins lead to unregulated cell proliferation, manifesting as the non-malignant tumours described above.
Classically, tuberous sclerosis presents clinically as a triad of mental retardation, epilepsy and adenoma sebaceum (Vogt's triad). Dermatological lesions, such as ashleaf macules, facial angiofibromas and shagreen patches,3 in combination with neurological involvement, in particular the presence of cortical tubers on brain MRI,4 are often the first step towards diagnosis, as was the case with our patient. New diagnostic criteria reflect the recognised phenotypical variability and multisystem nature of TSC, using major and minor criteria.5 By age 11, 80% of patients will demonstrate some form of renal manifestation.6 7 Renal cell carcinomas remain rare, seen in around 1% of cases, Renal cysts in 17–35% but by far the most common are AMLs seen in 50–75% of cases.8–10
AMLs are neoplasms derived from perivascular epithelioid cells containing blood vessels, smooth muscles and mature adipose cells.11 AMLs can also be found in the general population but remain rare. They are often found incidentally on radiological investigation and the symptoms are varied. A review by Nelson et al8 found the most common presenting symptoms to include flank pain (41%), palpable renal mass (11%) and haematuria (11%). Twenty per cent of patients with AMLs have tuberous sclerosis.12 Significantly, AMLs in patients with TSC behave differently to AMLs seen in the general population. They are typically larger, more often multiple, occur at a younger age and are more likely to grow and/or haemorrhage.13 14 The patient in our report had AMLs recognised on ultrasound at age 12 but had never been referred to a urologist. Subsequent ultrasounds arranged sporadically during her teenage years showed the lesions to be growing, yet she had not been referred.
As described above, the main concern with AMLs is the risk of rupture, which in severe cases can lead to cardiovascular shock, with 20–30% of patients presenting in this manner.8 The main predictor for haemorrhage is tumour size and specifically tumours greater than 4 cm in size. Steiner et al14 found that lesions with an initial diameter of 4 cm or more were more likely to grow than lesions smaller than 4 cm (46% vs 27%) and were more likely to require surgical intervention (53% vs 7%).15 The ultrasound of our patients 2 years ago demonstrated a lesion of over 5 cm in size.
Generally, the indications for intervention include acute haemorrhage and pain or size greater than 4 cm even when asymptomatic. Arterial embolisation allows nephron sparing while remaining minimally invasive and has thus become the preferred method of treating AMLs. Retrospective reviews have found the procedure to be safe and well tolerated,16 17 though AMLs in the TSC population appear to have a high recurrence rate, requiring repeat intervention.18 Moreover, recent studies, while supporting arterial embolisation as a first line therapy, advocate the role of conservative management for asymptomatic lesions, particularly if they are slow growing.19 20 Medical therapy has previously been unavailable for the treatment of AMLs but mTOR inhibitors potentially pave the way for an alternative to surgical interventions and will hopefully prove a useful management option in the near future,21 particularly in cases such as this, where there are multiple large lesions. For the patient described in our report, there is no doubt that she will require lifelong surveillance and follow-up.
Owing to the rare nature of the condition, predicting prognosis for our patient is somewhat difficult. Without doubt though, caution should be used with TSC patients with renal problems. Early specialist input should be sought as soon as renal lesions are identified, demonstrated to be growing (particularly after reaching the 4 cm threshold) and certainly when they present acutely.
Learning points.
Clinicians should be especially vigilant of seemingly innocent urinary tract infection-like symptoms in patients with tuberous sclerosis as they could represent a life-threatening event.
Early specialist input should be sought as soon as possible, particularly when lesions are identified and/or known to be growing.
The management of multiple renal lesions may prove difficult but the priority should be the lesion causing acute symptoms.
Acknowledgments
Dr Gaurang Ubhayakar (Consultant Radiologist).
Footnotes
Competing interests: None.
Patient consent: Obtained.
References
- 1.Orlova KA, Crino PB. The tuberous sclerosis complex. Ann NY Acad Sci 2010;1184:87–105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cheadle JP, Reeve MP, Sampson JR, et al. Molecular genetic advances in tuberous sclerosis. Hum Genet 2000;107:97–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Leung AKC, Robson WLM. Tuberous sclerosis complex: a review. J Pediatr Health Care 2007;21:108–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tassel PV, Curé JK, Holden KR. Cystlike white matter lesions in tuberous sclerosis. Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1367–73. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Roach ES, Sparagana SP. Diagnosis of tuberous sclerosis complex. J. Child Neurol 2004;19:643–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.O'Hagan AR, Ellsworth R, Secic M, et al. Renal manifestatións of tuberous sclerosis complex. Clin Pediatr 1996;35:483–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ewalt DH, Sheffield E, Sparagana SP, et al. Renal lesion growth in children with tuberous sclerosis complex. J Urol 1998;160:141–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nelson CP, Sanda MG. Contemporary diagnosis and management of renal angiomyolipoma. J Urol 2002;168:1315–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bissler JJ, Kingswood JC. Renal angiomyolipomata. Kidney Int 2004;66:924–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.O'Callaghan FJ, Noakes MJ, Martyn CN, et al. An epidemiological study of renal pathology in tuberous sclerosis complex. BJU Int 2004;94:853–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Eble JN. Angiomyolipoma of kidney. Semin Diagn Pathol 1998;15:21–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Logue LG, Acker RE, Sienko AE. Angiomyolipomas in tuberous sclerosis. Radiographics 2003;23:241–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Oesterling E, Fishman EK, Goldman SM, et al. The management of renal angiomyolipoma . New York: Elsevier, 1986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Steiner MS, Goldman SM, Fishman EK, et al. The natural history of renal angiomyolipoma. J Urol 1993;150:1782–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dickinson M, Ruckle H, Beaghler M, et al. Renal angiomyolipoma: optimal treatment based on size and symptoms. Clin Nephrol 1998;49:281–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Soulen MC, Faykus MH, Jr, Shlansky-Goldberg RD, et al. Elective embolization for prevention of hemorrhage from renal angiomyolipomas. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1994;5:587–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ewalt DH, Diamond N, Rees C, et al. Long-Term outcome of transcatheter embolization of renal angiomyolipomas due to tuberous sclerosis complex. J Urol 2005;174:1764–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kothary N, Soulen MC, Clark TWI, et al. Renal angiomyolipoma: long-term results after arterial embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005;16:45–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Harabayashi T, Shinohara N, Katano H, et al. Management of renal angiomyolipomas associated with tuberous sclerosis complex. J. Urol 2004;171:102–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hadley DA, Bryant LJ, Ruckle HC. Conservative treatment of renal angiomyolipomas in patients with tuberous sclerosis. Clin. Nephrol 2006;65:22–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Franz DN. Everolimus: an mTOR inhibitor for the treatment of tuberous sclerosis. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2011;11:1181–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
