Skip to main content
HHS Author Manuscripts logoLink to HHS Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 21.
Published in final edited form as: J Asthma. 2014 Mar 6;51(6):610–617. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2014.892966

Assessing asthma severity among children and adults with current asthma

Hatice S Zahran 1, Cathy M Bailey 1, Xiaoting Qin 1, Jeanne E Moorman 1
PMCID: PMC4544862  NIHMSID: NIHMS714886  PMID: 24506700

Abstract

Background

Asthma severity is a key indicator to assess asthma care and management. Severity status may vary over time. Assessing asthma severity periodically is important for monitoring the health and well-being of people with asthma.

Objective

To assess population-based asthma severity and to identify related-risk factors among children and adults with asthma.

Methods

We used the 2006–2010 BRFSS child and adult Asthma Call-back Survey. Asthma severity was classified as intermittent or persistent. We performed multivariate logistic regression to identify related-risk factors.

Results

Overall, 63.8% of persons with asthma had persistent asthma. Persistent asthma was more prevalent among children aged 0–4 years (71.8%; prevalence rate ratio [PR] = 1.3). Among adults with current asthma, persistent asthma was more prevalent among those who were 45 years or older (aged 45–54: 69.4%; PR = 1.1, aged 55–64: 72.6%; PR = 1.2, and aged 65+: 77.8%; PR = 1.3); annual household incomes of <$15 000 (74.1%; PR = 1.1); and first diagnosed at age 55 years or older (first diagnosed at age 55–64: 80.4%; PR = 1.1, at age 65 + : 81.5%; PR = 1.1). The prevalence of persistent asthma was also higher among current smokers who were also exposed to secondhand smoke (SHS) (74.7%; PR = 1.1); and among those with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (77.1%; PR = 1.2).

Conclusions

Nearly two-thirds of children and adults with asthma had persistent asthma. Identifying related-risk factors could help improve targeted interventions or strategies to reduce modifiable predictors (low income, smoking, and SHS) of increased asthma severity. Such strategies could improve asthma care and quality of life.

Keywords: Asthma control, current asthma, demographic characteristics, intermittent asthma, low income, persistent asthma, risk factors

Introduction

Asthma is a chronic lung disease that inflames and narrows the airways. Asthma affects nearly 26 million people, including 7.0 million children [1] who may experience recurring episodes of wheezing, chest tightness, shortness of breath, and coughing. These recurring episodes cause sleeplessness, daytime fatigue, reduced activity levels, school and work absenteeism, and increased health care use [1,2]. These, in turn, increase the economic burden on patients and society [3]. Although asthma cannot be cured, with effective asthma care and management, most persons with asthma can be free of symptoms and have a better quality of life. One of the key components of effective asthma care and management is assessing asthma severity to select appropriate therapy and to monitor the health and well-being of people with asthma [4,5].

Although the causes of asthma and the determinants of asthma severity remain poorly understood, multiple environmental and genetic factors play an important role in the development of asthma and the exacerbation of asthma symptoms [68]. Asthma severity is the inherent intensity of the disease process while asthma control refers to the degree that symptoms are successfully managed. Disease progression and symptoms can vary among individuals and within an individual’s experience over time. Although we do not know the factors that determine these variations and the underlying asthma severity, knowing asthma severity status is important to determining the type of treatment, its duration, and its effects on the level of asthma control that minimizes the frequency and intensity of symptoms and functional limitations [4,5].

Assessing the health and economic burden of the disease requires that one take both asthma severity and control into account. Several population-based studies have assessed the level of asthma control and examined the factors associated with asthma control [912]. However, to the best of our knowledge, limited population-based studies attempt to assess asthma severity [13,14]. One major issue in classifying asthma severity after treatment has started is that the severity of disease is most accurately assessed in patients before the initiation of long-term control medication and once a therapy has been started, the focus is on monitoring the level of control, not the level of severity [4]. Many respondents are already receiving long-term control medication at the time of the survey, further complicating the classification of asthma severity. Other issues impeding the population-based assessment of asthma severity is the varying measures used to classify severity, and the confusion between the underlying severity of disease and the current level of symptom control [15,16].

To evaluate population-based asthma severity, Fuhlbrigge and colleagues [13] defined asthma severity using the NAEPP 2003 guidelines. They showed that 77.3% of the study population (both children and adults with asthma) had moderate to severe persistent asthma. Colice and colleagues [14] used the NAEPP 2007 guidelines (EPR-3) to define asthma severity by using measures for current impairments and risk for future exacerbations among adolescents (aged 12–17 years) and adults (aged ≥18 years). They showed that 79% of patients had persistent asthma. For this study, we used the NAEPP 2007 guidelines for asthma severity classification for clinical research and population-based evaluations—that is, severity can be inferred from the least amount of treatment required to maintain asthma control [4]. We assessed asthma severity and determined the factors associated with it among children and adults with asthma in the states that participated in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) Asthma Call-back Survey (ACBS).

Methods

Survey data description

We analyzed 2006–2010 data from the BRFSS Asthma Call-back Survey (ACBS) for children (aged 0–17 years) and adults (aged 18 years and older). We combined 5 years of survey data to provide more stable estimates. During the 2006–2010 survey years, 35 states and the District of Columbia participated in the Child ACBS, while 40 states and the District of Columbia participated in the Adult ACBS.

The BRFSS ACBS is developed and funded by the Air Pollution and Respiratory Health Branch (APRHB) in the National Center for Environmental Health (NCEH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). It has been implemented as a follow-up survey to the BRFSS since 2006. The BRFSS ACBS is conducted approximately 2 weeks after the BRFSS telephone interview. Although BRFSS is a state-based, random-digit-dialed telephone survey of non-institutionalized U.S. adults, the BRFSS survey contains a Random Child Selection module and a Child Asthma Prevalence module, both of which were used in participating states to identify households with a child who had asthma in order to administer the Child ACBS. BRFSS respondents who report ever being diagnosed with asthma are eligible for the ACBS. Only one adult or one child per household could participate in the ACBS. An adult family member served as a proxy respondent for the child. The ACBS collects in-depth information about asthma symptoms and episodes/attacks, self-management education, healthcare utilization and access, medication use, comorbidities, and environmental allergens and irritants [17]. The ACBS response rate for children and adults varies by state and year. The median ACBS response rates for children (via adult proxies) ranged from 47.6% to 53.7% and for adults ranged from 47.5% to 54.3% during 2006–2010. More information on participating states, weight calculation, and the response rate can be found in the ACBS Summary Data Quality Report for each year at http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/acbs [17]. The data include sample weights to adjust for the unequal probability of selection, the disproportionate selection of population subgroups relative to the state’s population distribution, and disproportionate non-response.

Variables

We evaluated asthma severity status among children and adults with current asthma. Consistent with the methodology used with previous CDC publications, respondents were considered to have current asthma if they answered “yes” to both questions “Have you ever been told by a doctor, nurse, or other health professional that you had asthma?” and “Do you still have asthma?” [1,2].

Asthma severity was classified according to the severity classification for clinical research and population-based evaluations that was stated in EPR-3 [4]. Severity was inferred from the least amount of treatment required to maintain control. This way of defining severity depends on whether a respondent is receiving treatment and how well that treatment achieves a satisfactory level of control. To classify asthma severity, we first classified respondents as well controlled, not well controlled, and very poorly controlled using three impairment measures: daytime symptoms during the past 30 d, nighttime symptoms during the past 30 d, and use of short-acting β2-agonists (SABA) during the past 3 months for symptom control (not for prevention of exercise-induced bronchospasm) (Table 1). This is a modified version of the 2007 NAEEP guidelines because the ACBS did not include all required measures for current impairment (e.g. pulmonary function measures) and for future risk assessment (e.g. asthma exacerbations, progressive decline in lung function in adults, or reduced lung growth in children). We did not include one of the impairment measures, interference with normal activities, because the reference time for the question was the past 12 months and should only include more recent experiences [18]. Long-term asthma control medications (e.g. inhaled corticosteroids, systemic corticosteroids, long-acting beta2 agonist, Leukotriene receptor antagonists, methylxanthines, and immunomodulators) are used daily on a long-term basis to achieve and maintain control of persistent asthma [4]. Using asthma control status and long-term control medication status, we classified asthma severity into two categories: intermittent and persistent. Intermittent asthma includes those with current asthma whose asthma is well-controlled without being on long-term control medications. Persistent asthma includes those on long-term control medications, regardless of asthma control status, and those not on long-term control medications whose asthma is not well controlled or is very poorly controlled (Table 2). We did not sub-categorize persistent asthma as mild, moderate, or severe to avoid misclassification because of the absence of detailed information on long-term control medication use in the data.

Table 1.

Classification of asthma control modified from the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Expert Panel Report 3 guidelines.

Measures for current impairment Well controlled Not well controlled Very poorly controlled
Symptoms ≤2 d/week >2 d/week Throughout the day
Nighttime awakenings ≤1×/month (aged 0–4 yrs)
≤1×/month (aged 5–11 yrs)
≤2×/month (aged ≥12 yrs)
>1×/month (aged 0–4 yrs)
≥2×/month (aged 5–11 yrs)
1–3×/week (aged ≥12 yrs)
>1×/week (aged 0–4 yrs)
≥2×/week (aged 5–11 yrs)
≥4×/week (aged ≥12 yrs)
Short-acting β2-agonists used
 for symptom control
≤2 d/week >2 d/week   Several times/day

Table 2.

Classification of asthma severity for research and population-based estimates from the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Expert Panel Report 3 guidelines.

Asthma severity
status
Long-term control
medication use
Asthma control status
Intermittent asthma No
  • Well controlled

Persistent asthma Yes
  • Well controlled,

  • Not well controlled, or

  • Very poorly controlled asthma

No
  • Not well controlled or

  • Very poorly controlled asthma

In addition, for both children and adults, variables for demographic characteristics (age, sex, race/ethnicity), annual household income, age at the time asthma was first diagnosed, time since asthma was diagnosed, and environmental factors (secondhand smoking, pets allowed in bedroom, saw cockroach inside home in past 30 d, and saw or smelled mold in the past 30 d) were included in the analysis. For adults only, body mass index (BMI) (defined as weight in kilograms divided by height in square meters; obese = BMI ≥ 30), the presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), depression, and smoking status were also included in the analysis. Depression variable includes responses to the question: “ever been told by a doctor or other professional that you were depressed?” and the COPD variable includes responses to the questions: “ever been told by a doctor or other professional that you have emphysema,” “ever been told by a doctor or other professional that you have COPD,” or “ever been told by a doctor or other professional that you have chronic bronchitis.”

Statistical analysis

We used SAS-callable SUDAAN (version 10.0.0, RTI International, NC) to account for the complex sampling design of the BRFSS ACBS. Data from the participating states for each year were reweighted to account for the differences in sample size by year. We used sample weights to produce estimates that were generalizable to a participating state’s population. In addition to calculating descriptive statistics, we used the chi-square test and multivariate logistic regression to test for group differences and association between persistent asthma status and independent variables of interest. We presented weighted percent estimates, adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) (predicted marginal risk ratio), and 95% confidence intervals (CI). All prevalence ratios for both children and adults were adjusted (aPR) for sex, age, annual household income, age at first asthma diagnosis, time since asthma diagnosis, and environmental factors. In addition, prevalence ratios for adults were also adjusted for BMI, COPD, and depression. We did not find any multi-collinearity between independent variables since all tolerance estimates were ≥0.73, and only tolerance estimates below 0.40 are a concern [19]. Statistical significance was determined as a p value<0.05 by a non-directional z-test or by non-overlapping 95% CIs. Relative standard error (RSE = standard error/prevalence estimate) was used as a measure of an estimate’s reliability (a RSE of <0.30 indicates a “reliable” estimate) [20].

Results

All persons with current asthma

Overall, 63.8% of persons with current asthma had persistent asthma, 36.2% had intermittent asthma, 42.5% were on long-term control medication, and 47.5% had uncontrolled asthma.

Children with current asthma

Characteristics

In the combined 2006 through 2010 BRFSS ACBS sample, 9697 children met the definition of current asthma and were included in this analysis. Of children with current asthma, 60.3% met the definition for persistent asthma and 39.7% for intermittent asthma. Forty-six percent of children with current asthma were on long-term control medications and 38.4% had uncontrolled asthma (either not well controlled or very poorly controlled asthma) (Table 3).

Table 3.

Asthma severity, long-term control medication, and uncontrolled asthma status among children and adults with current asthmaa: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Asthma Call-back Survey, 2006–2010.

All persons
with asthma
Children with asthma
(aged 0–17 years) (n=9697)
Adults with asthma
(aged 18 years or older) (n=52 210)
% (95% CIb) Sample sizec % (95% CIb) Sample sizec % (95% CIb)
Asthma severity status
Intermittent Asthma 36.2 (35.2–37.1) 4013 39.7 (37.4–41.9) 15 680 35.2 (34.1–36.2)
Persistent Asthma 63.8 (62.9–64.8) 5684 60.3 (58.1–62.6) 36 530 64.8 (63.8–65.9)
Long-term control medication 42.5 (41.6–43.4) 4332 46.0 (43.7–48.3) 24 786 41.5 (40.5–42.5)
Uncontrolled asthma (Not well- or
 very poorly controlled asthma)
47.5 (46.6–48.5) 3518 38.4 (36.2–40.8) 27 832 50.0 (49.0–51.1)

Data source: CDC/BRFSS. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System: Child and Adult Asthma Call-Back Survey, 2006–2010.

a

Includes persons who answered “yes” to the questions: “Have you ever been told by a doctor, nurse, or other health professional that you had asthma?” and “Do you still have asthma?”

b

Weighted and unadjusted percentage and 95% confidence interval.

c

Unweighted pooled sample size, 2006–2010. Due to item non-response, individual characteristic categories may not sum to total.

Most of the children with current asthma were non-Hispanic white (57%) and male (57%). By age, 18.3% of children with asthma were aged 0–4 years, 43% were aged 5–11 years and 38% were aged 12–17 years. More than 50% of the children with asthma were in homes with annual household income of $50 000 or more. More than 65% had their asthma initially diagnosed when they were between ages 0 and 4 years. About 10% had been diagnosed with asthma within the past 12 months, and 41% were diagnosed 1–5 years ago, while 48% were diagnosed more than 5 years ago. The birth weight of most children with asthma was 2500 g or more (not low birth weight). Sixty-six percent had pets, and for 33% of the children, the pet was allowed in the child’s bedroom. Between 8% and 10% of the children with asthma were exposed to secondhand smoke (SHS) (9.9%), lived where a cockroach was seen (8.0%), or where mold was seen or smelled inside the home in the past 30 d (9.0%) (Table 4).

Table 4.

Asthma severity status among children (aged 0–17 years) with current asthmaa: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Asthma Call-back Survey, 2006–2010.

Survey respondents
(children with current asthma)
Persistent asthma prevalence
(n=5684)
Adjusted prevalence
rate ratio
Characteristics Sample sizeb % (95% CIc) % (95% CIc) aPR
Total 9697 60.3 (58.1–62.6)
Sex p=0.3628
 Male 5536 57.0 (54.7–59.3) 61.2 (58.2–64.1) Referent
 Female 4126 43.0 (40.7–45.4) 59.0 (55.5–62.5) 1.0 (0.9–1.1)
Age, year range p<0.0001
 0–4 1213 18.3 (16.4–20.4) 71.8 (66.3–76.8) 1.3 (1.1–1.5)
 5–11 3746 43.5 (41.2–45.9) 62.1 (58.6–65.4) 1.1 (1.0–1.3)
 12–17 4738 38.2 (36.0–40.4) 52.9 (49.4–56.3) Referent
Race/ethnicityd p=0.0515
 White 6472 57.2 (54.7–59.6) 61.3 (58.7–63.8) Referent
 Black 991 15.9 (14.2–17.9) 62.4 (56.1–68.3) 1.0 (0.9–1.1)
 Hispanic 971 16.9 (15.0–19.1) 63.2 (56.3–69.5) 1.0 (0.9–1.1)
 Other race 904 10.0 (8.5–11.6) 49.0 (40.9–57.1) 0.8 (0.6–0.9)
Household income p=0.6349
 <$15 000 811 11.7 (9.9–13.9) 65.2 (56.9–72.7) 1.1 (0.9–1.2)
 $15 000–$24 999 1223 14.5 (12.9–16.3) 56.7 (50.0–63.2) 0.9 (0.8–1.1)
 $25 000–$49 999 2103 21.0 (19.3–22.9) 60.4 (55.6–64.9) 1.0 (0.9–1.1)
 $50 000–$74 999 1684 16.6 (14.9–18.5) 59.7 (54.0–65.2) 1.0 (0.9–1.1)
 ≥$75 000 3351 36.1 (34.0–38.3) 60.9 (57.3–64.3) Referent
Age at asthma diagnosis p<0.0001
 0–4 5633 65.8 (63.7–67.9) 63.9 (61.1–66.6) 1.2 (1.0–1.5)
 5–11 3120 28.5 (26.5–30.5) 54.7 (50.6–58.7) 1.2 (0.9–1.4)
 12–17 751 5.7 (4.8–6.7) 47.1 (38.5–55.8) Referent
Time since asthma diagnosis p<0.001
 Within the past 12 months 810 9.9 (8.6–11.4) 73.8 (66.5–80.0) 1.2 (1.0–1.4)
 1–5 years ago 3698 41.5 (39.2–43.8) 60.2 (56.5–63.7) 1.0 (0.9–1.1)
 More than 5 years ago 5156 48.6 (46.3–51.0) 57.8 (54.7–61.0) Referent
Birth weight p=0.3099
 Low birth weight (less than 2500 g) 1059 14.0 (12.5–15.7) 57.4 (51.1–63.5) 0.9 (0.8–1.0)
 Not low birth weight 8070 86.0 (84.3–87.5) 60.9 (58.4–63.3) Referent
Secondhand Smoke exposuree p=0.6409
 Yes 877 9.9 (8.3–11.8) 58.5 (49.8–66.8) 1.0 (0.9–1.1)
 No 8796 90.1 (88.2–91.7) 60.6 (58.3–62.9) Referent
Pets allowed in bedroom p=0.0228
 Pets allowed 3754 33.3 (31.2–35.5) 56.1 (52.4–59.8) 0.9 (0.9–1.0)
 Pets NOT allowed 2226 22.7 (20.9–24.7) 63.3 (58.4–67.9) 1.1 (1.0–1.2)
 No pets 3710 44.0 (41.7–46.3) 62.0 (58.5–65.4) Referent
Saw cockroach inside home past 30 d p=0.5452
 Yes 721 8.0 (6.9–9.3) 62.8 (54.6–70.3) 1.0 (0.9–1.2)
 No 8945 92.0 (90.7–93.1) 60.3 (57.9–62.6) Referent
Saw or smelled mold past 30 d p=0.0293
 Yes 929 9.1 (7.8–10.6) 68.0 (61.2–74.2) 1.1 (1.0–1.3)
 No 8720 90.9 (89.4–92.2) 59.7 (57.3–62.1) Referent

Data source: CDC/BRFSS. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System: Child Asthma Call-Back Survey, 2006–2010.

a

Includes persons who answered “yes” to the questions: “Have you ever been told by a doctor, nurse, or other health professional that you had asthma?” and “Do you still have asthma?”

b

Unweighted pooled sample size, 2006–2010. Due to item non-response, individual characteristic categories may not sum to total.

c

Weighted and unadjusted percentage and 95% confidence interval.

d

Race categories “white, non-Hispanic”, “black, non-Hispanic”, include persons who indicated only a single race group. “Other races, non-Hispanic” includes Asian, American Indian Alaskan Native, Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander, persons reporting more than one race, and persons reporting their race as something other than those listed here.

e

Second-hand smoke exposure (SHS) status: includes children whose caregivers answered “yes” to the questions: “In the past week, has anyone smoked inside [his/her] home?”

Asthma severity and related risk factors among children with asthma

Persistent asthma prevalence was significantly higher among children with asthma aged 0–4 years (71.8%; aPR = 1.3[1.1–1.5]) than among those aged 12–17 years (52.9%), and was significantly lower among members of other races (49.0%; aPR = 0.8[0.6–0.9]) than among whites (61.3%). Unadjusted persistent asthma prevalence was also significantly higher among those who had been diagnosed with asthma at 0–4 years of age (63.9%) than among those who had been diagnosed at 12–17 years of age (47.1%). It was also higher if the time since asthma was first diagnosed was within the past 12 months (73.8%) than if it was diagnosed more than 5 years ago (57.8%); however, after adjustment for other variables in the model, these associations were no longer statistically significant. Regardless of adjustment, no association was observed with sex, household income, birth weight, and all environmental factors (SHS, saw cockroach inside home in past 30 d, or saw or smelled mold in past 30 d) (Table 4).

Adults with current asthma

Characteristics

In the combined 2006 through 2010 BRFSS ACBS sample 52210 adults classified as having current asthma were included in this analysis. Of adults with current asthma, 64.8% met the definition of persistent asthma and 35.2% met the definition of intermittent asthma. About 41% of adults with current asthma were on long-term control medications and 50% had uncontrolled asthma (either not well controlled or very poorly controlled asthma) (Table 3).

The majority of adults with current asthma were non-Hispanic whites (74.6%), and female (63.1%). About 31% of adults with current asthma were aged 18–34 years, 18.5% were aged 35–44 years, 19.6% were aged 45–54 years, 15.9% were aged 55–64, and 15.3% were aged 65+ years. Nearly 45% of adults with asthma had annual household incomes of $50 000 or more. Forty-five percent had child-onset asthma and 55% had adult-onset asthma. Most of the adults with current asthma were diagnosed more than 5 years ago (85.7%). Thirty-nine percent were obese. About 50.4% were smokers (current or former) or exposed to SHS. One-third had COPD (34.6%) and 34.7% had depression. Sixty percent had pets, and 44% of adults with asthma allowed the pets in their bedroom. About 10% saw a cockroach inside the home in the past 30 d (9.7%) or saw/smelled mold in the past 30 d (11.6%) (Table 5).

Table 5.

Asthma severity status among adults (aged 18 years or older) with current asthmaa: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Asthma Call-back Survey, 2006–2010.

Survey respondents
(adults with current asthma)
Persistent asthma
prevalence (n=36 530)
Adjusted prevalence
rate ratio
Characteristics Sample sizeb %c (95% CIc) %c (95% CIc) aPR
Total 52 210 64.8 (63.8–65.9)
Sex p<0.001
 Male 13 760 36.9 (35.9–38.0) 62.2 (60.2–64.3) Referent
 Female 38 450 63.1 (62.0–64.1) 66.3 (65.2–67.5) 1.0 (1.0–1.1)
Age, year range p<0.0001
 18–34 5617 30.7 (29.5–31.9) 53.4 (50.8–56.0) Referent
 35–44 6821 18.5 (17.8–19.3) 61.4 (59.1–63.7) 1.1 (1.0–1.1)
 45–54 11 416 19.6 (18.9–20.3) 69.4 (67.8–71.0) 1.1 (1.1–1.2)
 55–64 13 509 15.9 (15.4–16.5) 72.6 (71.1–74.1) 1.2 (1.1–1.2)
 65+ 14 643 15.3 (14.8–15.8) 77.8 (76.5–79.1) 1.3 (1.2–1.3)
Race/ethnicityd p=0.2426
 White 42 517 74.6 (73.6–75.6) 65.5 (64.3–66.6) Referent
 Black 3236 9.7 (9.0–10.3) 63.8 (60.1–67.4) 1.0 (0.9–1.1)
 Hispanic 2342 9.0 (8.3–9.7) 61.6 (57.2–65.8) 1.0 (0.9–1.0)
 Other race 3656 6.7 (6.2–7.4) 62.8 (57.8–67.5) 1.0 (0.9–1.0)
Household income p<0.0001
 <$15 000 8146 14.7 (14.0–15.5) 74.1 (71.5–76.5) 1.1 (1.1–1.2)
 $15 000–$24 999 8967 16.7 (15.8–17.5) 69.5 (66.6–72.3) 1.1 (1.0–1.1)
 $25 000–$49 999 12 351 23.8 (23.0–24.7) 65.7 (63.7–67.7) 1.0 (1.0–1.1)
 $50 000–$74 999 7143 15.1 (14.4–15.8) 63.0 (60.4–65.6) 1.0 (1.0–1.1)
 ≥$75 000 10 428 29.7 (28.7–30.7) 58.1 (55.9–60.2) Referent
Age at asthma diagnosis p<0.0001 Not included
 Child-onset asthma 15 033 44.9 (43.8–46.0) 57.5 (55.6–59.3)
 Adult-onset asthma 34 303 55.1 (54.0–56.2) 71.4 (70.2–72.5)
Age at asthma diagnosis p<0.0001
 0–4 4262 12.4 (11.7–13.2) 63.8 (60.5–67.0) 1.1 (1.0–1.1)
 5–11 6347 18.8 (17.9–19.8) 55.8 (52.9–58.7) 0.9 (0.9–1.0)
 12–17 4424 13.6 (12.8–14.5) 54.0 (50.5–57.4) 0.9 (0.9–1.0)
 18–24 4329 10.4 (9.8–11.1) 63.2 (59.9–66.3) Referent
 25–34 6915 13.5 (12.8–14.2) 66.1 (63.2–68.9) 1.0 (1.0–1.1)
 35–44 7817 12.7 (12.1–13.3) 72.9 (70.5–75.2) 1.1 (1.0–1.2)
 45–54 7109 9.2 (8.8–9.7) 76.6 (74.6–78.5) 1.1 (1.0–1.2)
 55–64 4849 5.6 (5.3–6.0) 80.4 (78.0–82.6) 1.1 (1.1–1.2)
 65+ 3284 3.7 (3.4–3.9) 81.5 (78.8–83.9) 1.1 (1.1–1.2)
Time since asthma diagnosis p<0.0001
 Within the past 12 months 1471 3.0 (2.7–3.4) 75.5 (69.9–80.4) 1.1 (1.0–1.2)
 1–5 years ago 6088 11.3 (10.6–12.0) 68.0 (64.4–71.3) 1.0 (0.9–1.1)
 More than 5 years ago 44 466 85.7 (84.9–86.4) 64.1 (63.0–65.2) Referent
Body Mass Index (BMI) p<0.0001
 Obese 20 714 39.4 (38.4–40.4) 68.4 (66.7–70.1) 1.1 (1.0–1.1)
 Non-obese 29 539 60.6 (59.6–61.6) 62.3 (61.0–63.7) Referent
Smoking status and SHSe p<0.0001
 Current smoker & SHS 6353 11.9 (11.2–12.6) 74.7 (71.7–77.6) 1.1 (1.1–1.2)
 Current smoker & No SHS 3138 7.6 (7.1–8.2) 65.2 (61.5–68.8) 1.0 (1.0–1.1)
 Former smoker & SHS 1341 2.6 (2.3–2.9) 74.2 (68.6–79.2) 1.1 (1.0–1.2)
 Former smoker & No SHS 16 247 24.6 (23.8–25.4) 69.3 (67.3–71.2) 1.0 (1.0–1.1)
 Non-smoker & SHS 1143 3.8 (3.3–4.3) 61.3 (53.9–68.3) 1.0 (0.9–1.1)
 Non-smoker &No SHS 23 667 49.6 (48.6–50.7) 60.1 (58.6–61.6) Referent
COPDf p<0.0001
 Yes 21 539 34.6 (33.7–35.5) 77.1 (75.6–78.6) 1.2 (1.1–1.2)
 No 30 480 65.4 (64.5–66.4) 58.4 (57.1–59.7) Referent
Depression p<0.0001
 Yes 19 734 34.7 (33.7–35.6) 70.5 (68.9–72.1) 1.1 (1.0–1.1)
 No 32 133 65.3 (64.4–66.3) 62.0 (60.6–63.3) Referent
Pets allowed in bedroom p=0.2233
 Pets allowed 22 711 44.3 (43.3–45.3) 65.6 (64.1–67.1) 1.1 (1.0–1.1)
 Pets NOT allowed 6950 15.2 (14.4–16.0) 65.5 (62.6–68.4) 1.0 (1.0–1.1)
 No pets 22 542 40.5 (39.5–41.5) 63.7 (62.1–65.3) Referent
Saw cockroach inside home past 30 d p=0.4950
 Yes 4098 9.7 (9.1–10.3) 66.0 (62.5–69.4) 1.0 (0.9–1.1)
 No 47 972 90.3 (89.7–90.9) 64.8 (63.7–65.8) Referent
Saw or smelled mold past 30 d p<0.01
 Yes 6017 11.6 (11.0–12.2) 69.1 (66.2–71.8) 1.1 (1.0–1.1)
 No 45 844 88.4 (87.8–89.0) 64.3 (63.2–65.4) Referent

Data source: CDC/BRFSS. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System: Child Asthma Call-Back Survey, 2006–2010.

a

Includes persons who answered “yes” to the questions: “Have you ever been told by a doctor, nurse, or other health professional that you had asthma?” and “Do you still have asthma?”

b

Unweighted pooled sample size, 2006–2010. Due to item non-response, individual characteristic categories may not sum to total.

c

Weighted and unadjusted percent and 95% confidence interval.

d

Race categories “white, non-Hispanic”, “black, non-Hispanic”, include persons who indicated only a single race group. “Other races, non-Hispanic” includes Asian, American Indian Alaskan Native, Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander, persons reporting more than one race, and persons reporting their race as something other than those listed here.

e

Includes adults who smoke and answered “yes” to the questions: “In the past week, has anyone smoked inside your home [secondhand smoke exposure (SHS)]?”.

f

Includes adults with emphysema or chronic bronchitis.

Asthma severity and related risk factors among adults with current asthma

Persistent asthma prevalence was significantly higher among adults with current asthma who were 45 years or older (45–54: 69.4%; aPR = 1.1[1.1–1.2]; 55–64: 72.6%; aPR = 1.2[1.1–1.2]; 65 + : 77.8%; aPR = 1.3[1.2–1.3]) than among those aged 18–34 years (53.4%). Persistent asthma prevalence was higher among adults with household income less than $15 000 (74.1%; aPR = 1.1[1.1–1.2]) than among those with income of $75 000 or more (58.1%). Persistent asthma prevalence was higher for those with older age at first diagnosis. Rates were significantly higher for those with an age at first diagnosed of 55–64 (80.4%; aPR = 1.1[1.1–1.2]) and 65+: 81.5%; aPR = 1.1[1.1–1.2]. In contrast, persistent asthma prevalence for those diagnosed at age 18–24 years was 63.2%. Also significantly associated with higher rates of persistent asthma were having COPD (77.1%; aPR = 1.2[1.1–1.2]) and smokers who were also exposed to SHS (74.7%; aPR = 1.1[1.1–1.2]). The corresponding reference levels were 58.4% and 60.1% respectively. Unadjusted persistent asthma prevalence was significantly higher among females (66.3%) than among males (62.2%) and among adults whose time since asthma diagnosis was within the past 12 months (75.5%) than if initial diagnosis was more than 5 years ago (64.1%). The unadjusted persistent asthma prevalence was higher among the obese (68.4%) than among the non-obese (62.3%) and it was higher among those who were depressed (70.5%) than among those who were not (62.0%). However, after adjustment for other variables in the model, the associations with sex, time since diagnosis, obesity, and depression were no longer statistically significant. Regardless of adjustment, neither race/ethnicity nor any of the environmental factors (pets allowed in bedroom, saw cockroach inside home in past 30 d, or saw or smelled mold in past 30 d) were associated with persistent asthma status (Table 5).

Discussion

The purpose of this population-based study was to assess asthma severity and identify related potential risk factors among children and adults with current asthma who participated in the ACBS in the years 2006 through 2010. Similar to the findings of previous studies [13,14], persistent asthma prevalence was high among this study population (63.8%); the rate was 60.3% among children and 64.8% among adults with current asthma. However, the rate was not as high as that reported by Fuhlbrigge et al. 2002 (77.3%) [13] and Colice et al. 2012 (79%) [14]. The difference in the rates reported by those studies could be attributable to differences in study methods and the population characteristics. In addition, our analysis finds that 42.5% of those with current asthma were on long-term control medications (higher for children [46%] than adults [41%]), and 47.5% had uncontrolled asthma (higher for adults [50.0%] than children [38.4%]).

Multiple extraneous factors (e.g. inadequate treatment, non-adherence to treatment regimens, reduced responsiveness to therapy, uncontrolled environmental triggers and irritants, and comorbid conditions) could contribute to these findings [6,9,2125]. However, many of these factors were either not examined because of a lack of data or else examined but did not show an association. In this study, we were able to identify some of the predictors of persistent asthma. Age was a strong predictor of asthma severity for both children and adults. Persistent asthma was more prevalent among children aged 0–4 years and among adults aged 45 years or older. Children, especially preschoolers, are at greater risk of developing illness because of developing immune system, hand-to-mouth behavior, lower body weight and higher intake rate, resulting in a greater dose of hazardous substance per unit of body weight, and dependence on others to meet basic needs such as housing, medical care and protection from hazardous environmental conditions [26]. These characteristics make children prone to frequent upper respiratory infections (common cold, ear infections, and epiglottitis) and make them susceptible to environmental allergens and irritants that may lead to exacerbation of asthma symptoms [24,26]. Although we did not observe the association, asthma duration (time since diagnosed) is associated with having persistent asthma (lower lung function, greater airway responsiveness, more asthma symptoms, and greater use of quick-relief asthma medications) among children [27,29].

As with previous studies [21,22,25,28,29], our study indicates that factors associated with persistent asthma among adults were being 45 years or older, having a household income of less than $15 000, older age at first diagnosis (aged 55 years or older), smoking and also exposure to SHS, and having COPD. However, for both children and adults, none of the known environmental risk factors for symptom exacerbations (cockroaches, mold, pets, and SHS [children only]) were significantly associated with persistent asthma [5,6]. Ours is not an unusual result, since a study of the same population at different time periods or a study of different populations can produce different results [30] and also because of social desirability bias associated with self-report surveys that is over-reporting desirable behaviors (exercise, not smoking) or under-reporting less desirable behaviors (smoking, mold, and cockroaches) [31]. Additional studies can be helpful in identifying additional modifiable predictors of uncontrolled asthma and determining contributing factors for persistent asthma. These efforts can lead to developing targeted interventions, producing strategies that reduce the health risks and economic impact of asthma and improving the health and well-being of people with asthma.

The strength of this study is that we analyzed a large sample size of children and adults with current asthma and assessed asthma severity status and symptom control in states that participated in the ACBS; the ACBS is the only survey providing most of the indicators that allow classification of asthma severity and asthma control by use of the NAEPP guidelines (EPR-3) and can be used to evaluate population-based asthma severity and symptom control.

There are also limitations to our study. One limitation is that the indicators available in the ACBS which can be used to classify asthma control and severity circumscribed our findings. Because of the content of the ACBS questionnaire, we were unable to include all of the required elements in the NAEPP guidelines (e.g. activity limitation, pulmonary function measures, asthma exacerbations that require oral corticosteroid and lung growth status in children) [4]. This limitation may lead to underestimation of persistence asthma prevalence. However, the definition of asthma control and severity in this analysis is consistent with the definition in other reports of population-based estimates [9,13,14]. Another limitation is that the ACBS response rates for the participating states were around 50%. Low response rates may affect the results by introducing non-response bias, if survey respondents differed from non-responders on the characteristics studied. However, the BRFSS sampling procedures and varying response rates among states over the 5-year study period can minimize non-response effects on the results [20,30]. In addition, because of the cross-sectional nature of the survey data, we could not generally determine the temporal sequence or causality. Finally, the findings cannot be generalized to the people with current asthma in states that did not participate in the ACBS.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that nearly two-third of children and adults with current asthma had persistent asthma. Moreover, despite national guidelines for asthma control and available advanced medical treatments, 38% of children and 50% of adults had uncontrolled asthma. Age (being aged 0–4 or 45 years or older), having a household income of less than $15 000, the age at which asthma is initially diagnosed (if aged 55 years or older), smoking and exposure to SHS, and COPD were significantly associated with having persistent asthma. There is a need for further studies to identify additional modifiable contributing factors for persistent asthma, because asthma severity determines the level of asthma control and responsiveness to therapy. Such additional studies can lead to development of targeted interventions or strategies that will reduce modifiable predictors of increased asthma severity and poor asthma control and, in turn, improve asthma care and quality of life.

Footnotes

Declaration of interest

The authors, H.S. Zahran, C. Bailey, X. Qin, and J.E. Moorman declare no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the article.

References

  • 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics [last accessed 8 Apr 2013];National Surveillance of Asthma: United States, 2001–2010. National Center for Health Statistics Data brief. No. 94. 2012 May; Available from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_03/sr03_035.pdf.
  • 2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Vital signs: asthma prevalence, disease characteristics, and self-management education — United States, 2001–2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60(17):547–552. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Barnett SBL, Nurmagambetov TA. Costs of asthma in the United States: 2002–2007. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127:145–152. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.10.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.US Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) [last accessed 8 Apr 2013];Expert panel report 3: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. 2007 Available from http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/asthma/asthgdln.pdf.
  • 5.Bousquet J, Mantzouranis E, Cruz AA, Aït-Khaled N, Baena-Cagnani CE, Bleecker ER, Brightling CE, et al. Uniform definition of asthma severity, control, and exacerbations: document presented for the World Health Organization Consultation on severe asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;123(5):926–938. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hannaway PJ. Asthma—an emerging epidemic: a manual for patients with asthma, parents of children with asthma, asthma educators, health-care providers, school nurses and coaches. Lighthouse Press; Marblehead (MA): 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Institute of Medicine Committee on the Assessment of Asthma and Indoor Air, Division of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention . “Front Matter.” Clearing the Air: Asthma and Indoor Air Exposures. The National Academies Press; Washington (DC): 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Willemsen G, van Beijsterveldt TC, van Baal CG, Postma D, Boomsma DI. Heritability of self-reported asthma and allergy: a study in adult Dutch twins, siblings and parents. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2008;11:132–142. doi: 10.1375/twin.11.2.132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nguyen K, Zahran HS, Iqbal S, Peng J, Boulay E. Factors associated with asthma control among adults in five New England states, 2006–2007. J Asthma. 2011;48(6):581–588. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2011.576744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bloomberg GR, Banister C, Sterkel R, Epstein J, Bruns J, Swerczek L, Wells S, et al. Socioeconomic, family, and pediatric practice factors that affect level of asthma control. Pediatrics. 2009;123(3):829–835. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-0504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Soriano JB, Rabe KF, Vermeire PA. Predictors of poor asthma control in European adults. J Asthma. 2003;40(7):803–813. doi: 10.1081/jas-120023572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Williams SA, Wagner S, Kannan H, Bolge SC. The association between asthma control and health care utilization, work productivity loss and health-related quality of life. J Occup Environ Med. 2009;51(7):780–785. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181abb019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fuhlbrigge AL, Adams RJ, Guilbert TW, Grant E, Lozano P, Janson SL, Martinez F, et al. The burden of asthma in the United States: level and distribution are dependent on interpretation of the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Guidelines. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:1044–1049. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2107057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Colice GL, Ostrom NK, Geller DE, Anolik R, Blaiss M, Marcus P, Schwartz J, et al. The CHOICE survey: high rates of persistent and uncontrolled asthma in the United States. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2012;108(3):157–162. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2011.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Osborn ML, Vollmer WM, Pedula KL, Wilkins J, Buist S, O’Hollaren M. Lack of correlation of symptoms with specialist-assessed long-term asthma severity. Chest. 1999;115(1):85–91. doi: 10.1378/chest.115.1.85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Spahn J, Calhoun WJ. Challenges in assessing asthma severity in clinical practice. Adv Stud Med. 2003;3(5A):S372–S378. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [last accessed 6 May 2013];BRFSS call-back surveys, 2006–2010 Asthma call-back survey History and Analysis Guidance. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/acbs.
  • 18.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Asthma Control Analysis Workgroup Measuring the impairment construct of asthma control from ERP-3 using the Asthma call-back Survey data. 2010. Unpublished data.
  • 19.Allison PD. Logistic regression using SAS system: theory and application. SAS Institute Inc.; Cary (NC): 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [last accessed 8 May 2013];Adult asthma data. Technical information. 2007 Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/asthma/brfss/07/brfsstechinfo.htm#anal.
  • 21.Barns PJ. Corticosteroid resistance in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;131(3):636–645. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.12.1564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dixon AE, Holguin F, Sood A, Salome CM, Pratley RE, Beuther DA, Celedón JC, et al. An official American Thoracic Society workshop report: obesity and asthma. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2010;7:325–335. doi: 10.1513/pats.200903-013ST. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bender BG. Overcoming barriers to nonadherence in asthma treatment. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002;109(6 Suppl):S554–S559. doi: 10.1067/mai.2002.124570. [Review] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Halterman JS, Auinger P, Conn KM, Lynch K, Lynch K, Yoos HL, Szilagyi PG. Inadequate therapy and poor symptom control among children with asthma: findings from a multistate sample. Ambul Pediatr. 2007;7(2):153–159. doi: 10.1016/j.ambp.2006.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pearlman AN, Chandra RK, Chang D, Conley DB, Tripathi-Peters A, Grammer LC, Schleimer RT, et al. Relationships between severity of chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyposis, asthma, and atopy. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2009;23(2):145–148. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2009.23.3284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.CDC [last accessed 6 Jan 2014];The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) public health assessments and health consultations: child health considerations. Available from: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/HAC/PHA/index.asp.
  • 27.Zeiger RS, Dawson C, Weiss S. Relationships between duration of asthma and asthma severity among children in the Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP) J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;103(3 Pt 1):376–387. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(99)70460-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ho G, Tang H, Robbins JA, Tong EK. Biomarkers of tobacco smoke exposure and asthma severity in adults. Am J Prev Med. 2013;45(6):703–709. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gibeon D, Chung KF. The investigation of severe asthma to define phenotypes. Clin Exp Allergy. 2012;42(5):678–692. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2012.03959.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kelsey JL, Whittemore AS, Evans AS, Thompson WD. In: Methods in observational epidemiology. 2nd ed Kelsey JL, Whittemore AS, Evans AS, Thompson WD, editors. Oxford University Press; New York: 1996. p. 17. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gendall P, Hoek J, Blakeley M. Estimating a socially undesirable behaviour. Market Bull. 1992;3:1–8. Article 1. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES