Abstract
BACKGROUND
Suspected genetic causes for extracellular matrix (ECM) dysregulation in the ascending aorta in patients with bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) has influenced strategies and thresholds for surgical resection of BAV aortopathy. Using 4-dimensional (4D) flow cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), we have documented increased regional wall shear stress (WSS) in the ascending aorta of BAV patients.
OBJECTIVES
We assessed the relationship between WSS and regional aortic tissue remodeling in BAV patients to determine the influence of regional WSS on the expression of ECM dysregulation.
METHODS
BAV patients (n = 20) undergoing ascending aortic resection underwent preoperative 4D flow CMR to regionally map WSS. Paired aortic wall samples (i.e., within-patient samples obtained from regions of elevated and normal WSS) were collected and compared for medial elastin degeneration by histology and ECM regulation by protein expression.
RESULTS
Regions of increased WSS showed greater medial elastin degradation compared to adjacent areas with normal WSS: decreased total elastin (p = 0.01) with thinner fibers (p = 0.00007) that were farther apart (p = 0.001). Multiplex protein analyses of ECM regulatory molecules revealed an increase in transforming growth factor β-1 (p = 0.04), matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1 (p = 0.03), MMP-2 (p = 0.06), MMP-3 (p = 0.02), and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (p = 0.04) in elevated WSS regions, indicating ECM dysregulation in regions of high WSS.
CONCLUSIONS
Regions of increased WSS correspond with ECM dysregulation and elastic fiber degeneration in the ascending aorta of BAV patients, implicating valve-related hemodynamics as a contributing factor in the development of aortopathy. Further study to validate the use of 4D flow CMR as a noninvasive biomarker of disease progression and its ability to individualize resection strategies is warranted.
Keywords: aneurysm, imaging, remodeling
INTRODUCTION
Bicuspid aortic valves (BAVs) are associated with an increased predisposition towards dilation of the ascending aorta that could increase the rates of aortic complications such as aortic dissection, rupture, and/or sudden death (1,2). Although several dilation patterns have been proposed (2), considerable debate remains as to whether they are due to an inherent aortic wall defect (i.e., genetic aortopathy) or are secondary to valve-related changes in regional hemodynamics and shear stress (i.e., acquired etiology). A genetic etiology for BAV aortopathy is widely accepted and may prompt aggressive resection strategies to remove diseased tissues at risk of future complications (3,4). Increasingly, valve-related hemodynamics are believed to contribute to disease progression (5). Greater understanding of the pathophysiology of BAV aortopathy may facilitate improved surgical resection strategies, development of best practices and effective clinical guidelines, and in so doing, optimize clinical outcomes (6).
Flow sensitive cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) with full volumetric coverage of the ascending aorta (4-dimensional or 4D flow CMR) can measure and visualize complex aortic 3-dimensional (3D) blood flow patterns, such as flow jets, vortices, and helical flow. Using 4D flow CMR, we previously observed that normally functioning BAVs are associated with disturbed flow patterns in the ascending aorta with regional increases in wall shear stress (WSS) (7), a parameter known to be associated with vessel wall remodeling (8). We further established that the location of BAV cusp fusion is associated with different patterns of ascending aorta dilation (9). Recent studies have provided significant associative evidence that the pattern of cusp fusion corresponds with the expression of aortopathy (10,11), thus aligning with previous imaging findings implicating altered outflow patterns and the regional expression of elevated WSS with BAV morphology. To further investigate these findings, in this study we measured aortic WSS by 4D flow CMR in healthy normal volunteers and BAV patients to detect nonphysiological values and, for the first time, correlated valve-related changes in WSS to regional tissue architecture and remodeling in paired BAV aortic wall tissue samples.
METHODS
With internal review board approval and informed consent, 20 BAV patients referred for ascending aortic surgery were enrolled. Patients with prior ascending aortic surgery or evidence of other forms of connective tissue disease were excluded. Healthy age-matched controls (n = 10) with tricuspid aortic valves were enrolled to compute regionally resolved 95% confidence interval (CI) values for physiologically normal aortic WSS (12); these controls had no evidence of cardiovascular disease and did not undergo surgery. The degree of aortic stenosis was graded based on absolute systolic peak velocity by continuous wave Doppler ultrasound (mild: 2 to 3 m/s; moderate/severe: ≥3 m/s) and aortic regurgitation was graded based on regurgitant fraction (mild: <30%; moderate/severe: ≥30%) (13).
Participants received preoperative CMR at 1.5 T or 3 T (Magnetom Aera, Espree, Avanto, Skyra, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany) to assess presence and significance of suspected BAV. 4D flow CMR provided complete volumetric coverage of the thoracic aorta for quantification of temporally resolved 3D blood flow velocities. Data were acquired during free breathing using respiratory and prospective electrocardiographic gating (14), with imaging parameters as described previously (12). Velocity encoding ranged from 150 to 400 cm/s based on the severity of valve stenosis. If glomerular filtration rate was >30 ml/min, gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadofosveset trisodium, or gadobenate dimeglumine were administered intravenously and flip angle was set to 15°; otherwise, 7° was used. Patient-specific WSS heat maps of the BAV aorta were computed relative to a map of the population average for healthy age-matched controls as described in detail previously (12,15,16). WSS regions outside the healthy 95% CI were classified as abnormal. Intra-aortic regions of normal, depressed, and elevated WSS were mapped onto 3D visualizations of patient-specific aortas (Figure 1).
Aortic wall samples were collected as permitted by the extent of ascending aorta resection; surgeons were blinded to WSS heat maps. Samples were labeled according to preoperative zonal designations relative to the position of the right pulmonary artery (zones 1, 2, and 3 correspond to regions proximal, adjacent, and distal to the right pulmonary artery, respectively; Figure 1), and according to circumferential location (greater curvature, lesser curvature, anterior or posterior wall). Tissue samples were divided in 2 for histology and protein analysis, flash-frozen in optimal cutting temperature freezing compound (VWR International, Radnor, Pennsylvania) and liquid nitrogen within 15 min of resection and stored at −80° C until use. Paired samples of each patient's aorta from regions of normal and elevated WSS were compared.
Tissue designated for histology was thawed, sectioned circumferentially, and fixed in 10% buffered neutral formalin (VWR International) for a maximum of 1 week and paraffin-embedded. Sections of 6 μm were mounted for Verhoeff-Van Gieson staining of medial elastin fibers. Chromatic analysis of elastin abundance was performed (Aperio ePathology, Leica Biosystems Inc., Buffalo Grove, Illinois). Total elastin content was computed as the mean percent area of elastin staining relative to the total area analyzed of 6 representative fields of view (40X magnification) as selected by blinded observer. Distance between intact elastin fibers and their thicknesses were measured (ImageScope Viewing Software, Leica Biosystems Inc.) by blinded observer with a mean value computed for each sample taken from an average of 131 measurements per circumferentially sectioned slide (as described by Bauer and co-workers [17]).
Tissue designated for protein quantification was homogenized in 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.5, 0.5% Tween 20, 150 mM NaCl and Roche complete protease inhibitor 1:100) and centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. Supernatant containing 1.0 μg protein was assayed in duplicate for concentration of transforming growth factor β-1 (TGFβ-1), matrix metalloproteinases (MMP), and tissue inhibitors of MMPs (TIMP) using the multiplex fluorescent bead assay (Eve Technologies, Calgary, Alberta, Canada).
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
All group data are presented as mean ± SD if normally distributed or as median (interquartile range [IQR] 25th quartile - 75th quartile) if non-normally distributed. Normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Normally and non-normally distributed data were compared using a paired Student t test or the Wilcoxon signed rank test, respectively (both 2-tailed). Cohort-averages between 2 groups were compared using Student t test when normally distributed or the Mann-Whitney test when non-normally distributed. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 6.0, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Patient demographics are summarized in Table 1. Healthy controls were used to define physiologically normal WSS values and were age-matched to BAV patients (50 ± 14 years vs. 48 ± 15 years respectively; p = 0.83). BAV patients were predominantly male with type 1 fusion of the right and left coronary cusps. Surgery was primarily indicated for BAV dysfunction; all patients had moderate/severe stenosis or regurgitation. Mean aortic diameter was 4.4 ± 0.5 cm at the sinus of Valsalva and 4.7 ± 0.6 cm for the ascending aorta. Most patients underwent aortic valve replacement (1 patient underwent BAV repair). All patients had ascending aortic resection with most requiring concomitant root replacement and a few undergoing hemi-arch resection using deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Tissue corresponding to regions of normal and elevated WSS were primarily collected from zone 2 of the BAV aorta and from the anterior wall and greater curvature, respectively. Samples collected from patients are summarized in Online Table 1.
TABLE 1.
Variable | BAV Study Population (N = 20) |
---|---|
Age, yrs | 48 ± 15 |
Female | 2 (10) |
BAV classification | |
Type 0, lateral | 2 (10) |
Type 1, RN | 1 (5) |
Type 1, RL | 12 (60) |
Type 2, RL/RN | 5 (25) |
Aortic diameter, cm | |
Sinus of Valsalva | 4.4 ± 0.5 (range: 3.7-5.7) |
Mid ascending aorta | 4.7 ± 0.6 (range: 3.6-6.3) |
Aortic valve function | |
No AS, moderate/severe AR | 5 (25) |
Mild AS, moderate/severe AR | 1 (5) |
Moderate/severe AS, no AR | 5 (25) |
Moderate/severe AS, mild AR | 3 (15) |
Moderate/severe AS, moderate/severe AR | 6 (30) |
Hypertension | 7 (35) |
Surgical procedure: aortic valve | |
Repair | 1 (5) |
Replacement | 19 (95) |
AVR | 4 (20) |
Bentall | 14 (70) |
Ross | 1 (5) |
Surgical procedure: AsAo | |
AsAo replacement | 20 (100) |
Root replacement | 16 (80) |
Hemi-arch | 8 (40) |
Values are mean ± SD or n (%).
AR = aortic regurgitation; AS = aortic stenosis; AsAo = ascending aorta; AVR = aortic valve replacement; BAV = bicuspid aortic valve; RN = right coronary-non-coronary cusp fusion; RL = right-left coronary cusp fusion.
We quantified the total elastin content and architecture by histology image analysis. Aortic wall from regions of normal and elevated WSS demonstrated significantly decreased elastin content and architecture consistent with aortopathy (Figures 1A through 1C). Aortic wall exposed to elevated WSS showed reduced elastin abundance compared to aortic wall subjected to normal WSS within the same aorta (p = 0.01; Figure 2A). Similarly, the cohort-averaged percent area of elastin was significantly decreased in regions of elevated WSS among BAV aortas (36.61 ± 16.87% vs. 49.12 ± 16.53%; p = 0.04; Figure 2B). Compared to aortic wall subjected to normal WSS, regions of elevated WSS had elastin fibers that were significantly thinner among patient pairs (p = 0.00007; Figure 2C). The absolute mean thickness of elastin fibers also was significantly decreased in regions of elevated WSS compared to regions of normal WSS (2.72 ± 0.40 μm vs. 3.25 ± 0.27 μm; p = 0.00002; Figure 2D). The median distance between elastin fibers was significantly greater in regions of elevated WSS compared to normal WSS (p = 0.001; Figure 2E). Similarly, cohort-averaged median distance between elastin fibers was significantly increased in aortic wall subjected to elevated WSS (28.34 μm [IQR 22.03 -36.32] vs. 20.39 μm [IQR 18.35 - 24.43]; p = 0.01; Figure 2F).
Regions of elevated WSS had significantly higher concentrations of TGFβ-1 protein (p = 0.04; Figure 3) compared to paired regions of normal WSS in the same aortas.
Aortic wall subjected to normal and elevated WSS within each patient's aorta were profiled for MMP and TIMP protein concentrations (Table 2). The absolute levels of MMP and TIMP protein expression in the samples were highly variable. MMP-2 and TIMP-2 were the most highly expressed MMP and TIMP in the aorta. Compared to regions of normal WSS, aortic wall exposed to elevated WSS demonstrated significantly increased relative concentrations of MMP-1 (p = 0.03), MMP-3 (p = 0.02), and TIMP-1 (p = 0.04), and there was a trend (p = 0.06) for increased concentrations of MMP-2.
TABLE 2.
Median Concentration (pg/ml) | IQR (pg/ml) | Range (pg/ml) | p Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
MMP-1* | ||||
Elevated WSS | 11.04 | 5.8-20.5 | 2.4-148.2 | 0.027 |
Normal WSS | 8.84 | 3.5-14.7 | 1.3-19.3 | |
MMP-2 | ||||
Elevated WSS | 8093.00 | 5062.0-13691.0 | 293.3-185897.0 | 0.064 |
Normal WSS | 6060.00 | 2621.0-12910.0 | 197.1-119902.0 | |
MMP-3 | ||||
Elevated WSS | 85.28 | 51.6-162.8 | 29.2-485.1 | 0.019 |
Normal WSS | 58.46 | 43.4-115.9 | 6.8-363.8 | |
MMP-7* | ||||
Elevated WSS | 75.3† | 54.2‡ | 8.5-165.6 | 0.653 |
Normal WSS | 69.3† | 72.7‡ | 0.0-235.3 | |
MMP-8 | ||||
Elevated WSS | 2596.0 | 778.4-6258.0 | 22.4-22744.0 | 0.294 |
Normal WSS | 3594.0 | 1754.0-7706.0 | 404.5-37267.0 | |
MMP-9 | ||||
Elevated WSS | 4806.0 | 2377.0-19356.0 | 479.6-74046.0 | 0.596 |
Normal WSS | 6581.0 | 3582.0-11796.0 | 1588.0-126759.0 | |
MMP-10* | ||||
Elevated WSS | 14.2 | 7.2-17.7 | 1.8-45.9 | 0.229 |
Normal WSS | 10.5 | 8.1-13.1 | 0.7-36.1 | |
TIMP-1 | ||||
Elevated WSS | 21442.0 | 11499.0-36679.0 | 4022.0-151540.0 | 0.040 |
Normal WSS | 14546.0 | 8485.0-19629.0 | 4136.0-149919.0 | |
TIMP-2 | ||||
Elevated WSS | 24931.0 | 15476.0-48537.0 | 10399.0-171363.0 | 0.756 |
Normal WSS | 21721.0 | 14892.0-40513.0 | 6384.0-336986.0 | |
TIMP-3 | ||||
Elevated WSS | 4138.0† | 2991.0‡ | 0.0-11961.0 | 0.079 |
Normal WSS | 3272.0† | 2794.0‡ | 0.0-9862.0 | |
TIMP-4 | ||||
Elevated WSS | 92.2 | 47.9-148.0 | 14.7-1173.0 | 0.165 |
Normal WSS | 79.0 | 57.7-128.9 | 1.9-840.1 |
Number of samples outside range of detection: MMP-1 = 7, MMP-7 = 10, MMP-10 = 2.
Concentrations are reported as median [IQR] when non-normally distributed or mean (†) ± SD (‡) when normally distributed. P values denote paired analyses between regions of normal and elevated WSS in each BAV aorta.
IQR = interquartile range (25th quartile - 75th quartile); MMP = matrix metalloproteinase; TIMP = tissue inhibitor of MMP; WSS = wall shear stress; other abbreviations as in Table 1.
DISCUSSION
BAV is an inheritable disorder and a genetic theory for the associated aortopathy is widely held, positing that the aorta has an inherent genetic weakness and is prone to dilation and rupture from an underlying dysregulation of extracellular matrix (ECM) in the aortic medial layer (1,5). This perspective has encouraged more aggressive approaches towards aortic resection using strategies similar to those applied in patients with proven genetic aortopathies, such as Marfan syndrome. Recently, we and others have shown that valve-related hemodynamics may play an important role in disease progression, where altered flow in the aorta is consistent with patterns of aortic dilation (9-11,18,19). Recognizing that hemodynamics may be altered in different regions of the ascending aorta, regional differences have been documented in key ECM proteins and cell phenotypic expressions, focused primarily on the convexity versus the concavity of the BAV aorta (20,21). These translational tissue studies suggest that valve-related hemodynamics may influence disease progression.
There is mounting evidence that both theories may coexist (5,22). Valve-related hemodynamics may exacerbate disease progression in genetically susceptible aortas (6). Given the absence of data showing a mechanistic link between cusp fusion patterns, altered aortic flow, and expression of disease, considerable debate surrounds the role of hemodynamics in mediating BAV aortopathy (5). Recently, using 4D flow CMR, we observed that even normally functioning BAVs are associated with disturbed ascending aortic flow and regional WSS increases, beyond the hemodynamic derangements accounted for by measures of stenosis and regurgitation (7). We further established that the location of BAV cusp fusion was associated with different patterns of ascending aortic dilation (9), suggesting that valve-related hemodynamics may influence the expression of BAV aortopathy.
Despite well-documented changes of WSS in BAV patients, its role in the underlying aortopathy is unclear. In the current study, distinct regions of increased WSS were uniformly observed in BAV patients despite varied cusp fusion patterns and types or degrees of valve dysfunction. The significant relationship between WSS derived from 4D flow CMR and regional aortic tissue remodeling provides evidence, for the first time, of the role of valve-related hemodynamics in BAV aortopathy (Central Illustration).
WSS CORRESPONDS TO CHANGES RELATED TO AORTOPATHY
To validate the influence of regional WSS on tissue remodeling, we compared the medial matrix architecture between areas of high and normal WSS within each BAV aorta. This analysis is advantageous as each patient serves as his or her own control. Degeneration of the aortic media, particularly its elastic laminae, is the sine qua non of BAV aortopathy, with a hallmark of elastic fiber fragmentation (23). Bauer and colleagues also observed medial elastin degeneration characteristic of BAV aortopathy, documenting thinner elastic laminae and increased distances between laminae (17). In patients with BAV stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement, Girdauskas and colleagues documented qualitative differences in aortic histology at the level of aortotomy with different systolic transvalvular flow patterns (24).
We observed disrupted medial elastin fiber architecture in the aortic wall of our patient cohort, consistent with BAV aortopathy, coupled with the novel finding that elastin fiber fragmentation and architectural derangement was significantly increased in areas of high versus normal WSS within the same aortas. Areas of normal WSS also had evidence of medial matrix degradation consistent with BAV aortopathy, although less severe than corresponding areas of high WSS. Given that histologic abnormalities are diffuse within the BAV aorta and our study population had relatively mild levels of aortic dilation (most <5.0 cm), the increased elastin degradation observed in the areas of high WSS relative to adjacent areas with normal WSS is a striking observation that provides strong evidence implicating valve-related hemodynamics in medial matrix degradation in BAV aortopathy.
TGFβ is strongly implicated in the mechanotransduction of WSS upstream of flow-induced vascular remodeling (25). In animal models of human aortopathy, TGFβ signaling is implicated in vascular disease and progression as a critical mediator of aortopathy (26). Forte and colleagues showed that TGFβ and TGFβ receptor-2 are increased in BAV aorta, suggesting a role for TGFβ in mediating disease (20). In this study, we provide novel data linking aortic TGFβ protein expression to local increases in WSS, with ascending aortic TGFβ concentration significantly elevated in regions of high aortic WSS compared to adjacent regions with normal WSS. These data strongly implicate WSS as contributing to TGFβ expression in the BAV aorta.
MMPs can directly degrade elastic ECM components. Supporting a mechanistic role for valve-related hemodynamics in MMP expression, Ikonomidis and colleagues showed altered MMP profiles stratified by cusp fusion pattern in the BAV aorta (27). While many MMPs are expressed in the aorta, MMP-2 is highly implicated in aortic aneurysms and elastic matrix degeneration of remodeled arteries (28). Animal models provide proof of concept for WSS as a trigger for aortic wall MMP activation. For example, flow-mediated induction of MMP-2 expression was demonstrated in rabbit carotid arteries in association with medial matrix degeneration and vessel dilation (29). Furthermore, Atkins and colleagues modeled BAV-related elevated WSS in an ex vivo porcine aorta system, and found increased MMP-2 expression and activity (30). We previously reported evidence of MMP-2 elevations in the BAV aorta (31). The cumulative evidence by meta-analysis of all such studies confirms that MMP-2 is consistently elevated in human BAV aortopathy (32).
In the current study, we observed that aortic wall MMP-2 was the most highly expressed MMP in the BAV aorta, with a trend (p = 0.06) for greater expression in areas of high WSS as compared to adjacent areas with normal WSS in the same patients, and with significant increases in MMP-3 in the same areas. Importantly, the elevated levels of MMP-2, MMP-3, and TGFβ areas of increased WSS were associated with fragmented medial elastin fibers. This observation also strongly implicates WSS in mediating BAV aortic disease progression. In addition to a direct role in degrading elastic tissue, it is noteworthy that MMP-2 and MMP-3 can activate latent TGFβ and increase its activity. These factors may work synergistically to induce medial matrix remodeling.
The observed TIMP changes are complex and the substantial variability between patients and regions studied suggests that the regulatory control of TIMP expression is less influenced by WSS than specific MMPs and TGFβ. TIMP-1 levels were increased in areas of high WSS but no significant difference was observed between groups with respect to other TIMP species. The lack of increased compensatory TIMP-2 expression in areas of high WSS may result in heightened MMP-2 activity. Further study is required to better define and understand the influence of specific MMPs and TIMPs in BAV aortopathy and their expression and activities with respect to valve-related hemodynamics.
STUDY LIMITATIONS
In our study, 4D flow CMR was used as a research tool to obtain WSS maps in individual patient aortas to better understand whether blood flow patterns play a role in the expression of BAV aortopathy. Given the spatial and temporal resolution of 4D flow CMR, underestimation of WSS is known to occur (7); however, relative WSS values (i.e., high/low WSS) are retained between subjects when consistent imaging parameters are employed. Here, we used similar parameters to those of a prior study that demonstrated the robustness of WSS measurements (33). Additionally, same-patient samples ensured that the relative WSS measurements were obtained in the same subject and same exam. Therefore, resolution was not deemed a significant factor for the study protocol to detect elevated WSS. While the concentrations of specific proteins of interest were examined, further studies should investigate TGFβ and MMP-2 activities and other associated factors such as shifts in cell phenotype that may also mediate matrix remodeling. Additional comparison to patients with tricuspid valves and dilated aortas with areas of increased WSS should also be explored.
CONCLUSIONS
Regions of increased WSS correspond with ECM dysregulation and elastic fiber degeneration in the ascending aorta of BAV patients, implicating valve-related hemodynamics as a mediator of aortopathy. WSS as assessed by 4D flow CMR may serve as a noninvasive biomarker of regional aortic disease in patients with BAV aortopathy (deemed sufficiently severe to warrant operative intervention). Its utility in prediction of disease progression, particularly in earlier and less severe BAV aortopathy, awaits careful study, as does the efficacy of a targeted surgical approach incorporating regional aortic WSS.
Supplementary Material
PERSPECTIVES.
COMPETENCY IN MEDICAL KNOWLEDGE: Measurements made using 4-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography (4-D flow MRI) suggest that valve-related hemodynamics contribute to the development of aortopathy in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV).
TRANSLATIONAL OUTLOOK: Validation studies are needed to confirm the utility of 4D flow CMR as a noninvasive marker of disease progression, predictor of aortic dissection or rupture, and guide to the extent of surgical resection based on detailed measurements of regional aortic heamodynamics.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the recruitment and organizational efforts of Colleen Clennon (Chicago), the staff of Northwestern's Center for Translational Imaging, Drs. Amy Bromley (Calgary) and Yong-Xiang Chen (Calgary) for their histological expertise, and Thomas Kryton for histological database management (Calgary).
Funding Sources: Melman Bicuspid Aortic Valve Program, Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute (PWMF), AHA 14POST20460151 (PvO), NIH K25HL119608 (AJB), and NIH R01HL115828 (MM).
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
- 4D flow CMR
time-resolved velocity-encoded phase contrast cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
- BAV
bicuspid aortic valve
- ECM
extracellular matrix
- MMP
matrix metalloproteinase
- TGFβ
transforming growth factor beta
- TIMP
tissue inhibitor of MMP
- WSS
wall shear stress
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Disclosures: None.
REFERENCES
- 1.Fedak PW, Verma S, David TE, et al. Clinical and pathophysiological implications of a bicuspid aortic valve. Circulation. 2002;106:900–4. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000027905.26586.e8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Verma S, Siu SC. Aortic dilatation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1920–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1207059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Verma S, Yanagawa B, Kalra S, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and practice patterns in surgical management of bicuspid aortopathy: a survey of 100 cardiac surgeons. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;146:1033–40. e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.06.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rinewalt D, McCarthy PM, Malaisrie SC, et al. Effect of aortic aneurysm replacement on outcomes after bicuspid aortic valve surgery: Validation of contemporary guidelines. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148:2060–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.03.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Girdauskas E, Borger MA, Secknus MA, et al. Is aortopathy in bicuspid aortic valve disease a congenital defect or a result of abnormal hemodynamics? A critical reappraisal of a one-sided argument. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;39:809–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Della Corte A, Body SC, Booher AM, et al. Surgical treatment of bicuspid aortic valve disease: knowledge gaps and research perspectives. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147:1749–57. 1757, e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.01.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Barker AJ, Markl M, Burk J, et al. Bicuspid aortic valve is associated with altered wall shear stress in the ascending aorta. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:457–66. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.973370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lehoux S, Tedgui A. Cellular mechanics and gene expression in blood vessels. J Biomech. 2003;36:631–43. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(02)00441-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mahadevia R, Barker AJ, Schnell S, et al. Bicuspid aortic cusp fusion morphology alters aortic three-dimensional outflow patterns, wall shear stress, and expression of aortopathy. Circulation. 2014;129:673–82. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kang JW, Song HG, Yang DH, et al. Association between bicuspid aortic valve phenotype and patterns of valvular dysfunction and bicuspid aortopathy: comprehensive evaluation using MDCT and echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:150–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Della Corte A, Bancone C, Dialetto G, et al. Towards an individualized approach to bicuspid aortopathy: different valve types have unique determinants of aortic dilatation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;45:e118–24. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt601. discussion e124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.van Ooij P, Potters WV, Collins J, et al. Characterization of Abnormal Wall Shear Stress Using 4D Flow MRI in Human Bicuspid Aortopathy. Ann Biomed Eng. 2015;43(6):1385–97. doi: 10.1007/s10439-014-1092-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:e57–185. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Markl M, Harloff A, Bley TA, et al. Time-resolved 3D MR velocity mapping at 3T: improved navigator-gated assessment of vascular anatomy and blood flow. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;25:824–31. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.van Ooij P, Potters WV, Nederveen AJ, et al. A methodology to detect abnormal relative wall shear stress on the full surface of the thoracic aorta using four-dimensional flow MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2015;73:1216–27. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Potters WV, van Ooij P, Marquering H, van Bavel E, Nederveen AJ. Volumetric arterial wall shear stress calculation based on cine contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;41:505–16. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bauer M, Pasic M, Meyer R, et al. Morphometric analysis of aortic media in patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:58–62. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03650-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bissell MM, Hess AT, Biasiolli L, et al. Aortic dilation in bicuspid aortic valve disease: flow pattern is a major contributor and differs with valve fusion type. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:499–507. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.000528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hope MD, Hope TA, Meadows AK, et al. Bicuspid aortic valve: four-dimensional MR evaluation of ascending aortic systolic flow patterns. Radiology. 2010;255:53–61. doi: 10.1148/radiol.09091437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Forte A, Della Corte A, Grossi M, et al. Early cell changes and TGFbeta pathway alterations in the aortopathy associated with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis. Clin Sci. 2013;124:97–108. doi: 10.1042/CS20120324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cotrufo M, Della Corte A, De Santo LS, et al. Different patterns of extracellular matrix protein expression in the convexity and the concavity of the dilated aorta with bicuspid aortic valve: preliminary results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;130:504–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Della Corte A. The conundrum of aortic dissection in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: the tissue, the mechanics and the mathematics. Q3 Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;48:150–1. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.de Sa M, Moshkovitz Y, Butany J, David TE. Histologic abnormalities of the ascending aorta and pulmonary trunk in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease: clinical relevance to the Ross procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;118:588–94. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(99)70002-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Girdauskas E, Rouman M, Disha K, et al. Correlation between systolic transvalvular flow and proximal aortic wall changes in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;46:234–9. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt610. discussion 239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ohno M, Cooke JP, Dzau VJ, Gibbons GH. Fluid shear stress induces endothelial transforming growth factor beta-1 transcription and production. Modulation by potassium channel blockade. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:1363–9. doi: 10.1172/JCI117787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Holm TM, Habashi JP, Doyle JJ, et al. Noncanonical TGFbeta signaling contributes to aortic aneurysm progression in Marfan syndrome mice. Science. 2011;332:358–61. doi: 10.1126/science.1192149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ikonomidis JS, Ruddy JM, Benton SM, Jr, et al. Aortic dilatation with bicuspid aortic valves: cusp fusion correlates to matrix metalloproteinases and inhibitors. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93:457–63. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.09.057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Chung AW, Au Yeung K, Sandor GG, et al. Loss of elastic fiber integrity and reduction of vascular smooth muscle contraction resulting from the upregulated activities of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 in the thoracic aortic aneurysm in Marfan syndrome. Circ Res. 2007;101:512–22. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.157776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tronc F, Mallat Z, Lehoux S, et al. Role of matrix metalloproteinases in blood flow-induced arterial enlargement: interaction with NO. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20:E120–6. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.20.12.e120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Atkins SK, Cao K, Rajamannan NM, Sucosky P. Bicuspid aortic valve hemodynamics induces abnormal medial remodeling in the convexity of porcine ascending aortas. Biomech Model Mechan. 2014;13:1209–25. doi: 10.1007/s10237-014-0567-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Fedak PW, de Sa MP, Verma S, et al. Vascular matrix remodeling in patients with bicuspid aortic valve malformations: implications for aortic dilatation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126:797–806. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5223(03)00398-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Rabkin SW. Differential expression of MMP-2, MMP-9 and TIMP proteins in thoracic aortic aneurysm - comparison with and without bicuspid aortic valve: a meta-analysis. VASA Zeitschrift fur Gefasskrankheiten. 2014;43:433–42. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Markl M, Wallis W, Harloff A. Reproducibility of flow and wall shear stress analysis using flow-sensitive four-dimensional MRI. J Magn Res Imaging. 2011;33:988–94. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.