SUMMARY
Chlamydia trachomatis is the most common bacterial sexually transmitted pathogen worldwide. Infection can result in serious reproductive pathologies, including pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy, and infertility, in women. However, the processes that result in these reproductive pathologies have not been well defined. Here we review the evidence for the human disease burden of these chlamydial reproductive pathologies. We then review human-based evidence that links Chlamydia with reproductive pathologies in women. We present data supporting the idea that host, immunological, epidemiological, and pathogen factors may all contribute to the development of infertility. Specifically, we review the existing evidence that host and pathogen genotypes, host hormone status, age of sexual debut, sexual behavior, coinfections, and repeat infections are all likely to be contributory factors in development of infertility. Pathogen factors such as infectious burden, treatment failure, and tissue tropisms or ascension capacity are also potential contributory factors. We present four possible processes of pathology development and how these processes are supported by the published data. We highlight the limitations of the evidence and propose future studies that could improve our understanding of how chlamydial infertility in women occurs and possible future interventions to reduce this disease burden.
INTRODUCTION
Chlamydia trachomatis infection is one of the most common bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) worldwide, with the WHO's most recent estimates indicating approximately 100 million new infections annually (1); in the United States alone, approximately 1.4 million Chlamydia infections occurred in 2013 (2). C. trachomatis is a Gram-negative, obligate intracellular bacterial pathogen with a unique biphasic developmental cycle (3). The organism has been characterized by using biology and genomics as a highly evolved or ancient pathogen with evidence of a reduced genome that is tailored for the obligate intracellular human niche (4). The infection can result in serious reproductive consequences, including pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), ectopic pregnancy, and infertility, in women. Genital Chlamydia infection is asymptomatic in over 70% of the cases, and as a result, few population-based prevalence or incidence estimates are available (5). Available population-based data from the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom suggest that between 3 and 5% of people under 30 years of age will have a Chlamydia infection at any point in time (6–10). Estimates of the incidence of disease sequelae (specifically, PID, ectopic pregnancy, and infertility in women) are lacking, largely because there are very few natural-history studies of Chlamydia infections in humans. A systematic review attempting to establish the attributable risk of infertility among women following genital Chlamydia infection concluded that there is currently not sufficient evidence to accurately determine the population attributable risk (11). Surveillance of infertility on a population level is very limited, and thus it is difficult to ascertain whether an increased incidence of Chlamydia infection (or indeed the increased detection and treatment of infections) is associated with concurrent trends in infertility.
However, there is robust evidence that women who have experienced PID are more likely to develop infertility and robust evidence that Chlamydia infection causes PID. Specifically, a longitudinal cohort study was conducted by Weström et al. (12) to evaluate PID and fertility outcomes. The study followed 1,844 women with abnormal laparoscopic findings upon suspicion of acute PID (case subjects; not limited to Chlamydia infection) and 657 women who had normal findings (controls). Follow-up found that upon attempting to become pregnant, 16.5% of the case subjects and 2.7% of the controls failed to conceive (12). Further investigations demonstrated that 141 (10.8%) of the PID case subjects and none of the controls had developed tubal factor infertility (TFI) (12). In addition, the ectopic pregnancy rate was also higher in the PID case subjects, with 9.1% of the case subjects and 1.4% of the controls experiencing ectopic pregnancy (12). However, this study did not detail the infectious agent underlying the initial PID.
A randomized controlled trial to evaluate if chlamydial screening can prevent PID (prevention of pelvic infection trial) found that the risk of PID among women whose Chlamydia infections were left untreated was 9.5%, considerably higher than the 1.6% risk of PID among women whose infections were treated (13). Mathematical modeling suggested that PID can occur at any time point during the natural history of an infection; therefore, annual chlamydial screening programs may reduce the incidence of PID (14). A separate model concluded that annual screening could prevent 61% (95% credible interval, 55 to 67%) of Chlamydia-associated PID (15).
The risk of infertility due to Chlamydia infection is much lower than that of PID; for example, in Sweden, using a retrospective hospital record review process, it was found that women who had a positive Chlamydia test had an adjusted hazards ratio of 1.31 (95% confidence interval, 1.09 to 1.57; P < 0.0001) of having infertility compared to women who tested negative for Chlamydia, although there was no significant difference in ectopic pregnancy outcomes (16). The performance of the serological tests that are commonly used in conjunction with gynecological investigation to attribute infertility to Chlamydia is one of the limitations of the assessment of the burden of chlamydial infertility. However, a meta-analysis conducted in 2011 compared micro-immunofluorescence (MIF) tests and several enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and found that MIF tests had the highest accuracy (area under the curve) for a positive reaction in women with tubal pathology (P < 0.001; P = 0.01 for bilateral occlusion) (17). Regardless of test performance, numerous studies have identified a correlation of Chlamydia serology positivity (Chlamydia antibody testing) with diagnosed TFI (18–24). Analysis of these published data by using a model estimated that the proportion of tubal infertility caused by Chlamydia is 45% (credible interval, 28 to 62%) (25).
In spite of the considerable worldwide burden of chlamydial disease, the host and pathogen determinants that result in infertility are still not known. It is possible that identification of the risk factors for the development of serious sequelae could be used to implement additional targeted screening and treatment of at-risk women to reduce the burden of this disease. Furthermore, recent exciting advances have been made in the development of a chlamydial vaccine (26); however, it will be critical to establish that any vaccine will not have unwanted consequences for reproductive pathology in some women. Therefore, in order to inform future developments in the field, we have chosen to focus this review specifically on infertility in women. Infertility is defined as the inability to have a healthy live baby after 12 months of unprotected timed intercourse. The majority of the studies reviewed for this report state their definition of infertility as inability to achieve successful pregnancy after >12 months of unprotected sex. Some studies refer to subfertility, which is defined as reduced fertility with a prolonged time of unwanted nonconception, and we consider this compatible with infertility for the purpose of this review. PID and ectopic pregnancy are also reviewed here, with ectopic pregnancy defined as tubal development of the embryo. In order to identify what is known and what is not known about the host and pathogen factors that result in the development of infertility in women, we used PUBMED searches to identify and review the relevant literature to generate this review (focusing on direct human evidence). Our aim is to highlight the most solid or consistently identified factors that are known already and to identify the gaps in our knowledge of the risk factors that could predict or determine infertility outcomes in women that should be addressed in future studies to ensure optimal vaccine design and inform improved diagnostics.
CHLAMYDIAL FACTORS THAT MAY INFLUENCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF PATHOLOGY
Chlamydial Serovars Can Associate with Repeat Infection and Symptoms That May Also Relate to a Propensity To Cause Pathology and Infertility
Chlamydial serovars are assigned on the basis of the immune response to the major outer membrane protein and typically in more recent work by sequencing this locus (27). Serovars E and F are generally found to be predominant in most countries, including Australia, Netherlands, and Sweden (28–32). Using omp1 PCR-based restriction fragment length polymorphism genotyping, Lan et al. (33) reported that in women <30 years old, serovars D (4/21 asymptomatic women) and I (4/21 asymptomatic women) were associated with asymptomatic infection, while serovar G was associated with symptomatic infection (4/30 symptomatic cases). Similarly, Gao et al. (30) also reported the predominance of serovar G in symptomatic infection, particularly lower abdominal pain (18/33 patients), compared to asymptomatic patients (P < 0.001) among female sex workers and sexually transmitted disease (STD) patients in China. Of the asymptomatic patients, 47.5% (28/59) had serovar E (30). Verweij et al. reported that different serovars induced differential serological responses in 510 women with PCR-confirmed C. trachomatis infection (34). Their study showed that serovars D (n = 45) and E (n = 217) from serogroup B elicited the highest IgG responses (median IgG titer of 200), followed by serovar H (n = 20) (34). Women with persisting infections were found to have twice as may serovar E infections (67%, 8/12) than women who naturally cleared their infections (33% 3/9) in a longitudinal study of women with asymptomatic C. trachomatis infections; however, this was not a significant difference (35). However, several design flaws in the study done by Morré et al. in 2002 have been pointed out and therefore it may not be appropriate to draw conclusions from these data (e.g., see references 36 and 37). It is important to note that some infected women do not launch a detectable serological response against elementary bodies (EBs) from several serovars or antigens (independent of the infecting serovar), suggesting that not all infections result in a detectable humoral immune response (38). While not linked directly to infertility, the majority of the evidence from these studies supports the idea that different serovars do have different associations with symptoms, the immune response, reinfection, or infection duration, all of which may contribute to pathology development.
Chlamydial Genotypes Can Mediate Tissue Tropism and May Be a Factor in Pathology Development
There are several published reports of C. trachomatis genotypic differences associating with tissue tropism but no data yet aligning chlamydial genotypes with pathology development and infertility. The best-known genotype that mediates tissue tropism is polymorphism in the trpAB operon, which disables the synthesis of tryptophan from indole in C. trachomatis ocular strains but not in genital strains (39, 40). It is mentioned here because of the significance of this finding to the field even though this review is focused on infertility. There is also evidence of positively selected genotypes that align with tissue tropism (ocular, genital, mononuclear/invasive). For example, in a review of 59 C. trachomatis genome sequences, it was reported that the Tarp gene and the pmp genes have positively selected polymorphisms that cluster significantly with tissue niches (41). Polymorphisms in three distinct open reading frames have been found to associate with rectal but not cervical serovar G isolates, and two further open reading frame polymorphisms were found to associate with rectal and cervical tropism of serovars E, F, and J (42). These studies do not identify tissue pathology-associated polymorphisms; however, they do support the theoretical potential for chlamydial genotypes to exist that either increase the frequency of ascension or enhance upper reproductive tract survival or polymorphisms that alter the immune response. Determination of an association a chlamydial genotype with pathology development would be possible only by a longitudinal study of a large group of women throughout their reproductive years with continual sampling and analysis of infecting chlamydial strains.
IMMUNE RESPONSES ASSOCIATED WITH C. TRACHOMATIS IN WOMEN
Insight into the immunological factors that may be involved in C. trachomatis infertility in women has been obtained through various human studies, including local secretions (cervical and vaginal lavages), human tissues, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), as well as through in vitro cell culture models. However, while numerous studies are mentioned here (but not all, because of space limitations), many of these were on relatively small numbers of patients or immune factors, and in fact, there is very sparse evidence on the host immune response in women with chlamydial infertility. The innate response to infection is clearly critical for the infection outcome and, as outlined in the cellular paradigm process (discussed below), could be the major determinant of either a pathological result or resolution of the infection. A framework commonly used to categorize the adaptive immune response is the Th1-Th2 paradigm (reviewed in reference 43). This paradigm suggests that the immune response can polarize toward a cytotoxic response (Th1) or a humoral antibody-mediated response (Th2). The profiles of these responses include the Th1 subset of T helper (Th) lymphocytes and the production of cytokines such as interleukin-2 (IL-2), IL-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α), and gamma interferon (IFN-γ) (44, 45), and Th2 responses involve IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, and IL-13 (44). In addition to Th1-Th2, regulatory immune profiles typified by IL-17 or IL-23 have also recently been described (reviewed in reference 46). Here we summarize the existing evidence on the human immune response to C. trachomatis and how this evidence fits four different possible processes of infertility development (presented at the end of this review) by using these immune categories.
Immune Responses from Reproductive Sites and Tissues
Genital secretions have been used to reveal the immunological responses that occur at the site of infection, although it is not possible to link these with subsequent pathology. IFN-γ levels were found to be five times as high in the endocervical secretions of women with C. trachomatis infection detected by culture (n = 47) as in those of uninfected women (n = 52) (47). Analysis of immune factors by a multiplex immunoassay in cervical-vaginal lavage fluids of women with acute C. trachomatis infection (n = 5) attending an STD clinic compared to those of controls with no infections (n = 13) revealed significantly higher levels of IL-1β, lactoferrin, TNF-α, IL-8, vascular endothelial growth factor, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (CSF), IL-10, IL-3, IL-7, IL-12, and IL-6 (48). In another study in India, IFN-γ levels were significantly higher only in women with recurrent C. trachomatis infections than in controls but not higher than in those with primary infections (49). IL-17 and IL-22 were five and three times as high in the cervical secretions of C. trachomatis-positive women (n = 27) as in negative controls (n = 17) (50). Titers of IgG and IgA antibodies to C. trachomatis EBs were higher in the cervical washes of C. trachomatis-positive fertile women during primary infection than during recurrent infection (49). However, the cervical titer of IgG to specific chlamydial antigens (cHSP60 and cHSP10) was higher in a recurrent infection than in a primary infection, which is what would be expected (49). Flow cytometric analysis of lymphocytes present at the cervixes of C. trachomatis-infected women identified the increased presence of a unique cell type, α4β7+ CLA+ memory T cells (51). Stimulation of cervical monocytes with chlamydial EBs showed increased expression of Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) and TLR4, and both receptors were also found to be expressed at higher levels in cervical cells from infected women than in those from uninfected women (52). The levels of IL-1β, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, and IL-10 were reported to be significantly higher in enriched cervical T cells stimulated with chlamydial inclusion (Inc) membrane proteins from women with C. trachomatis-related infertility (n = 18) than in those from C. trachomatis-positive fertile women (n = 14) (53). While ectopic pregnancy is not only a Chlamydia-related pathology, a study by Balasubramaniam et al. that found that levels of the cytokines IL-8 and IL-6 were significantly upregulated in the fallopian tubes immediately at the location of implantation of ectopic pregnancy but not in the fallopian tubes of women undergoing benign hysterectomy (54). A very recent study found that differences in IFN-γ levels correlated with differences in the chlamydial cellular morphologies at the cervix when comparing two patients (55). In summary, the consistent findings of these studies are that IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-1, IL-8, and high antibody responses to some antigens are associated with chlamydial responses in the reproductive tracts of infertile women and Chlamydia-infected women (a notable caveat being that much of the evidence is from uncomplicated infections).
Examination of the effects of chlamydial infection in human tissue ex vivo has provided a controlled insight into the cellular responses that likely occur in vivo immediately upon primary infection. Through ex vivo fallopian tube studies, Hvid et al. (56) showed that the addition of IL-1 receptor antagonists blocked the IL-1 and IL-8 induced in response to Chlamydia and this prevented the pathology from chlamydial infection (56). This confirms that IL-1 and IL-8 are likely major factors in tubal pathology (56), supporting the cellular paradigm of pathology development and not supporting the hypersensitivity model. This study further implicates the innate immune response as a possible determinant of infection outcome.
Fallopian tube explants from women with ectopic pregnancy who were C. trachomatis seropositive were used to demonstrate that C. trachomatis induced higher expression of a prokineticin receptor via TLR2 binding (57). The prokineticin pathway impacts smooth muscle contraction and intrauterine implantation, as well as angiogenesis, which may imply a mechanism for C. trachomatis damage leading to ectopic pregnancy (57). T lymphocytes from endometrial and salpingeal tissues cultured ex vivo in the presence of Chlamydia or cHSP60 showed induction of lymphocyte proliferation and IFN-γ secretion from PID or ectopic pregnancy cases compared to cell lines (58). In the same patients, higher levels of IFN-γ mRNA expression and lower levels of IL-5 in fallopian tube and peritoneal cavity specimens from PID patients who had T cells proliferating in response to the organism ex vivo further implicated Th1 cytokine production in C. trachomatis-related pathology (58). However, it is important to note that these Th1 responses may be required to resolve the infection, and the clearance compared to the tissue pathology results from a Th1 profile immune response are not well understood. Primary endocervical cell cultures infected with C. trachomatis also demonstrated a proinflammatory cytokine response, with abundant production of IL-8, IL-1α, and TNF-α, all of which were maximally detected during live infection with active bacterial protein synthesis (59). These primary endocervical cultures indicate that the innate immune response to Chlamydia is typically proinflammatory, which is what may be required to successfully resolve the infection. Combined, these data predominantly support the cellular paradigm and ascending infection models of pathology and link to a Th1 profile of immunity. However, given that a cytotoxic response is needed to resolve an infection, differentiation between a successful Th1 profile or response associated with resolution of infection and one that results in tissue damage is not possible in the absence of longitudinal data.
Immune Responses in PBMC in Women
PBMC are often used to provide insight into how immune cell responses to Chlamydia relate to the patient infection or disease status. PBMC proliferation induced by purified C. trachomatis EBs showed prominent secretion of IFN-γ in women with genital infections (60). In a separate study, PBMC from healthy donors were incubated with C. trachomatis serovar K, leading to the finding that proinflammatory gene expression (measured by microarray and validated by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR) was sustained for up to 7 days, especially for IFN-γ, and IL-2 receptor γ (61). However, in one report, cHSP60-stimulated PBMC production of IFN-γ was lower in women with PID or repeat infections than in women with current infections (62, 63). Dendritic cells prepared from human PBMC were infected with C. trachomatis serovar E or L2, which induced the production of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12p70, IL-18, and TNF-α (64). Production of IL-12 and TNF-α by human PBMC-sourced dendritic cells infected with C. trachomatis L2 was reported (65). Hook et al. (66) showed that stimulation of PBMC with chlamydial EBs elicited IFN-γ production by natural killer cells. Cohen et al. (67) showed that IFN-γ production from PBMC stimulated with cHSP60 correlated with patients who were protected from acquisition of infection in a longitudinal study of 143 female patients (67). This study also showed that the PBMC production of IL-13 in response to chlamydial EBs also correlated with a reduced risk of infection (67). Our own research has demonstrated IL-6 production from endometrial and endocervical primary ex vivo cultures from live infections with C. trachomatis (68).
Immune Pathway Elucidated by In Vitro Culture Models
Epithelial cell cultures are most commonly used for in vitro growth and characterization of C. trachomatis infection (69). C. trachomatis infection of HeLa cells, SiHa human cervical carcinoma epithelial cells, and HEp2 human epithelial cells was used to demonstrate that IL-1α regulates IL-8 production in these cell lines during infection (70). Similarly, mRNA measurement of cytokine expression after C. trachomatis infection of HeLa cells, SiHa cervix squamous carcinoma cells, and HT-29 colon adenocarcinoma cells showed increased levels of IL-8, GROα, granulocyte-macrophage CSF, IL-6, and IL-1α (59). A HeLa–THP-1 coculture model attempting to recapitulate the in vivo cellular cross talk also identified IL-6 and IL-8 cytokine secretion that was sustained during C. trachomatis infection with IL-1β transiently detected (71). IL-6 and IL-8 were also detected by using cervical and epithelial cell infection models (59). A HeLa and THP-1 (mononuclear cell) coculture model found that there are distinct profiles of innate immune responses to C. trachomatis serovars E and L2. The results also showed a difference between the two serovars in the effectiveness with which monocyte-released innate cytokines (such as TNF-α) controlled the infection in an epithelial cell model (72). Using a similar coculture model, our team also demonstrated sustained IL-6 production in response to C. trachomatis L2 infection (59). Examination of host and chlamydial gene expression by a high-throughput RNA sequencing method enabled the investigators to identify a fibrotic profile of gene expression being induced in infected HEP-2 cells (73), although it would be interesting to see the outcome of the same experiment with a reproductive tract cell line or primary ex vivo studies. The role of TNF-α in the inhibition of chlamydial development was evaluated by the addition of recombinant TNF-α to Hep2 cells prior to infection, which resulted in smaller inclusion bodies (74). Furthermore, addition of IFN-γ to the cell line showed that, in combination with TNF-α, chlamydial replication was inhibited (74). Lu et al. (75) showed that chlamydial infection of several epithelial cell lines resulted in the secretion of mature IL-18. IL-18 is known to potentiate the Th1 immune response and enhance the production of IFN-γ (75).
Recently, two teams demonstrated important links among apoptosis, cell survival, and carcinogenesis for Chlamydia (76, 77). They demonstrated that sustained p53 downregulation is the key event that prevents apoptosis in Chlamydia-infected cells and that this is actively mediated by Chlamydia via the p53-MDM2 axis and ubiquitination (76, 77). These important in vitro findings demonstrate that it is not just via innate immune and pathogen defense pathways that Chlamydia impacts the cell, but other central host cell pathways are also fundamentally required for the pathogen's survival. These studies support the ideas that IFN-γ has a central role in the immune response and quite probably infection clearance or prevention of infection and that, potentially, the level or combination of the immune response may modulate the resolution or pathological outcome of infection.
Conclusion
Overwhelmingly, the studies of in vivo responses, ex vivo cultures, and laboratory cell culture models all support a higher level or predominance of a Th1 or cytotoxic profile of immune response to chlamydial infection, with IFN-γ, IL-8, IL-1, and IL-6 findings featuring almost universally in the studies (although IFN-γ was also associated with protection against a repeat infection). However, it is not clear if the type or level of pathological response is moderated or different between women who develop pathology and those who resolve the infection without pathology. Longitudinal sampling and analysis of correlates of the local immune response, the PMBC response, and infection clearance relative to the initial infection burden with the development of upper reproductive tract pathology is one possible study design that could help to clarify the contribution of proinflammatory primary immunity.
HOST/HUMAN FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH CHLAMYDIAL INFERTILITY IN WOMEN
Repeat Infection and Infertility
Repeat infection represents a substantial proportion of the chlamydial infections detected annually (reinfection review in reference 78). It is likely that these repeat infections are made up of reinfections, treatment failures, and persistent infections (79). Batteiger et al. studied a longitudinal cohort of 210 adolescent women (14 to 17 years old) in the United States and found that 121 experienced repeat infections (79). In a longitudinal cohort in Australia, 1,116 women (16 to 25 year old) were followed up and 14 reinfections were observed in a total of 81 women who were at risk of repeat infection (3 of these had two episodes of reinfection) (cumulative risk over 12 months of 20.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 13.2 to 37.6%) (32). Interestingly, in this study in Australia, the organism load was lower in reinfections than in prevalent infections detected at the study baseline (32) but there were no associations between patient characteristics and reinfection (32) (possibly because the study was underpowered to detect an effect). However, careful consideration of the study design is needed when evaluating repeat infection; the studies of Batteiger et al. and Walker et al. tested quarterly for Chlamydia, and PCR may detect residual DNA from dead organisms causing a false positive (i.e., increased frequency or timing of specimen collection can overestimate repeat infection). A study conducted in Vancouver, Canada, showed that repeat infections occurred in 8 of 42 patients in a longitudinal study (both genders), indicating a cumulative incidence of 29% (95% CI, 12 to 46%), although the study was confounded by the immediate retesting of some patients (80). A study in the United Kingdom showed that the reinfection rate was 29.9 (range, 19.7 to 45.4) per 100 person years in a general practice clinic setting (81). Interestingly, it appears that women who resolve their infections spontaneously between diagnosis and returning for treatment are more protected from a repeat infection (82). As we would expect, infection and repeat infection are significantly associated with sexual behavior risk factors such as new partners or failure to use condoms (32). These repeat infection rates appear to be higher than the reported infertility outcome rates of women who had a positive Chlamydia test in the retrospective cohort study of Low et al. (16), suggesting that repeat infection is not the sole determinant of infertility or pathology. However, there is evidence that repeat infection increases the risk of developing infertility. A retrospective cohort study by Hillis and coworkers in Wisconsin examined the risk of hospitalization for ectopic pregnancy or PID in women who had one or more chlamydial infections (n = 11,000). They identified higher risks of ectopic pregnancy in women who had two (odds ratio [OR], 2.1; 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.4) or three or more (OR, 4.5; 95% CI, 1.8 to 5.3) chlamydial infections (83). The PID risk was also higher for women who had two (OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.6 to 9.9) or three or more (OR, 6.4; 95% CI, 2.2 to 18.4) chlamydial infections (83). Therefore, repeat infection is likely to be a significant contributing factor in at least some cases of chlamydial infertility.
Treatment failures induced by antibiotics have also been proposed to contribute to repeat infection rates (reviewed in reference 84). Batteiger et al. (79) showed that repeat infections in 13.7% of their patients were due to possible or probable treatment failures. Additionally, in vitro studies have shown that azithromycin induces chlamydial persistence or heterotrophic resistance (84–87). Therefore, treatment failure or perhaps indirect failure via persistence could be a contributing factor in the development of infertility in some women via all of the proposed mechanisms.
The rise of repeat infections detected over time has resulted in the proposal that increased public health investment in chlamydial screening and treatment is preventing the development of natural immunity to the infection (arrested-immunity hypothesis) (88, 89). Furthermore, the authors propose that these repeat infections may be the source of pathological sequelae that may not occur in women who have protective immunity from a naturally resolved infection (88, 89).
Do Coinfections or the Microbiome Play a Role in Chlamydial Pathology?
Coinfections with other STIs are common; for example, 46% of female patients positive for Neisseria gonorrhoeae were also positive for Chlamydia in a family planning clinic in the United States (90). However, a serology study in Zimbabwe demonstrated that women with antibodies to either C. trachomatis or N. gonorrhoeae were significantly more at risk of having PID, ectopic pregnancy, or abnormal fallopian tubes than were women with antibodies to both pathogens (91), suggesting that infection with both pathogens is not necessary for reproductive pathology. But this study needs to be interpreted with caution, as the antibody tests for the gonococcus are not sufficiently sensitive. Numerous studies have implicated bacterial vaginosis in chlamydial infection (92–96). Patients with bacterial vaginosis who had recent contact with a male with chlamydial urethritis had an OR of 3.4 (95% CI, 1.5 to 7.8) to test positive for chlamydial infection. The presence of H2O2-producing lactobacilli in the vagina were protective against the acquisition of infection (OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2 to 0.8) (93). Recently an in vitro model was used to demonstrate that it is actually the acid or pH-lowering impact of lactobacilli that confers antichlamydial activity (97). It has been hypothesized that indole-producing organisms that increase in the microbiome during or subsequent to bacterial vaginosis enable C. trachomatis to synthesize tryptophan from indole (98), consequently evading the activity of IFN-γ at the infected site, and thus may facilitate infection (40, 98). Bacterial vaginosis during C. trachomatis or N. gonorrhoeae infection was recently found to be associated with a risk of PID, although the authors conclude that it is difficult to determine if the bacteria underlying the vaginosis facilitated ascension and PID caused by the STIs or, alternatively, if the bacteria responsible for vaginosis cause the PID (99). Clearly, there is an increased chlamydial infection risk associated with coinfection or bacterial vaginosis and also evidence of an association with PID, supporting the idea that coinfections could therefore result in an increased likelihood of development of infertility.
Sexual Behavior and Age of Sexual Contact
Age is a risk factor in the likelihood of contracting a chlamydial infection, with younger people at higher risk (10, 100). Cross-national studies from 1999 to 2008 in Denmark, Australia, and Sweden showed that increasing PID rates were associated with increasing age (15 to 19 year olds generally had the lowest number of cases per 100,000 women, while 30 to 34 or 35 to 39 year olds had the highest number of cases per 100,000 women), with the exception of New Zealand, where the rates were higher in women 15 to 19 years old (101). The highest incidence of C. trachomatis infection is in women 16 to 24 years old (32). Consistent with these studies, being under 20 years old and presenting with cervical symptoms were risk factors for endocervical chlamydial infection in women, and the organism burden was also higher in younger women when measured by viable culture counts (102).
Sexual behavior (new partners or a higher number of partners) is often significantly associated with an increased risk of C. trachomatis infection (7, 103). As shown in the study by Skjeldestad et al. (104), where there was a 37% probability of a woman acquiring C. trachomatis infection if she has had three or more partners within 42 months. A younger age at first coitus, a higher number of sexual partners, and a self-reported history of medically diagnosed STI were all significantly associated with tubal infertility, in contrast to fertile controls (P < 0.01) (105). However, as these are also known to be significant factors in the increased likelihood of acquisition of chlamydial infection, it is not certain if they directly influence the likelihood of pathology outcomes from the infection.
Hormonal Status at Time of Infection
Oral contraceptive use was found to be a risk factor for C. trachomatis infection (P = 0.006), and the organism burden was found to be higher in oral contraceptive users (P < 0.001) (102). Prospective recruitment of young female patients (≤17 years of age) attending genitourinary medicine clinics in the United Kingdom found that those who had a Chlamydia infection were also more likely to have elevated progesterone concentrations (P = 0.05) (106). In contrast, oral contraceptive use has been linked to protection from subsequent infertility or conception problems by two different studies (12, 107). However, it would be extremely difficult to link hormone status at time of infection with subsequent pathological outcomes such as infertility, even in a longitudinal study, given the high numbers of oral contraceptive users and the independent importance of these factors in the risk of acquiring an infection.
Human Genotypic Factors Associated with C. trachomatis Infertility in Women
The development of C. trachomatis-related infertility in only some women may be a consequence of a genotypic predisposition (reviewed comprehensively in reference 108). These studies are described below; however, for the sake of brevity, we have documented the sample sizes, statistics, and details of the alleles in Table 1. Note that since a comprehensive review of this topic (mentioned above) has recently been published, this section is brief (108).
TABLE 1.
Locus | Study parameters | Significance | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
TLR1 (rs5743618), TT | Prospective recruitment in PEACH PID study; 111 women with PID confirmed C. trachomatis negative by PCR, 94 women with PID confirmed C. trachomatis positive by PCR | TT genotype, increased risk of PID with chlamydial infection (adjusted OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.3–6.2; P = 0.008) | 112 |
TLR2-16934 (T>A [rs4696480], +2477 G>A [rs5743708]) | Fertility clinic, 17 C. trachomatis IgG-negative women with tubal pathology, 13 C. trachomatis-positive women without tubal pathology, 26 C. trachomatis IgG-positive women with tubal pathology (C. trachomatis status: MIF test titer, >1:32); sexual health clinic, 147 C. trachomatis IgG-positive women, 81 C. trachomatis IgG-positive asymptomatic women, 66 C. trachomatis IgG-positive symptomatic women, 321 C. trachomatis IgG-negative women | Individual SNPs not significantly associated with infection, risk, symptom, or infertility; haplotype, −16934A with +2477G; higher in women with C. trachomatis but not tubal pathology (P = 0.015; OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.1–0.75); decreased proportion when women ranked from asymptomatic to symptomatic infections to C. trachomatis positive and tubal infertility | 111 |
TLR4 (rs1927911 CC allele) | Prospective recruitment in PEACH PID study, 111 C. trachomatis-negative (PCR) women with PID, 94 women with PID C. trachomatis positive by PCR | CC allele significantly associated with Chlamydia positivity in PID participants (P = 0.002) | 112 |
CD14 (−260C>T) | Whole blood from 44 healthy females, distribution of TNF-α allele among male and female participants in Taiwan (26 with TT, 36 with C. trachomatis, 22 with CC) | TT allele associated with significantly higher TNF-α production when whole blood stimulated with C. trachomatis (P < 0.05; relatively minor differences in actual concn) | 124 |
Dutch women of Caucasian origin C. trachomatis positive by MIF test with titer of ≥1:32; STD clinic, 135 C. trachomatis IgG positive, 49 C. trachomatis IgG negative, n = 49; subfertility clinic, 41 C. trachomatis IgG positive, 212 C. trachomatis IgG negative, 28 C. trachomatis IgG positive with tubal pathology, 22 C. trachomatis IgG negative with tubal pathology, 170 healthy controls | No significant difference in distribution of CD14 polymorphism in STD or infertility cohort | 153 | |
NLRP3 (AG or AA at SNP [rs12065526]) | Sexual health clinic; 99 C. trachomatis-positive women, 44 C. trachomatis-positive symptomatic women, 219 C. trachomatis-negative women,, 75 C. trachomatis-negative symptomatic women, 93 healthy fertile controls | Those with AG or AA at SNP rs12065526 were at significant risk of developing abdominal pain when C. trachomatis infected (P = 0.047; OR 2.9; 95% CI, 1.8–8.0; not significantly associated with infection risk or tubal pathology) | 114 |
MBL (high-MBL2-producing genotypes [HYA/HYA, HYA/LYA]) | 76 C. trachomatis IgG-positive women with TFI (total n = 157), 71 C. trachomatis IgG-positive women without TFI (total n = 398) | High-MBL2-producing genotypes HYA/HYA (P = 0.054; OR 3.72; 95% CI, = 1.07–12.78) and HYA/LYA (P = 0.019; OR = 0.28; 95% CI, = 0.11–0.75) higher in C. trachomatis-positive women than in C. trachomatis-positive women with TFI; MBL2 genotypes LXA/LXA higher in C. trachomatis-positive women with TFI than in C. trachomatis-positive women without TFI (P = 0.025; OR 2.34; 95% CI, 1.17–4.69) | 110 |
HLA class II allele (DRB1*1503, DRB5*0101) | Infertility clinic in Kenya; 33 C. trachomatis IgG-positive women with TFI (MIF titers, ≥1:16), 37 C. trachomatis IgG-negative women with TFI | DRB1*1503 detected in 7 women with TFI who were C. trachomatis negative and absent in C. trachomatis-positive women with TFI (P = 0.01; OR 0.05; 95% CI, = 0–0.7); DRB5*0101 more common in C. trachomatis-seronegative women with TFI than in C. trachomatis-seropositive women with TFI (P = 0.05; OR = 0.2; 95% CI, 0.02–1) | 116 |
Cytokines IL-10 (1083AA), TNF-α (−308A), IL-12B (rs3212227, AC), IL-10 1082A | 114 infertile women at Helsinki infertility clinic, 176 fertile controls, 96 C. trachomatis IgG-positive women with TFI (MEDAC ELISA kits) | IL-10 increased risk of tubal damage in C. trachomatis-positive women (OR, 7.3; 95% CI, 1.3–4.2); TNF-α increased risk of tubal damage in C. trachomatis-positive women (OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.0–16) | 120 |
100 women with TFI, 125 pregnant fertile controls, 94 C. trachomatis IgG-positive women with TFI, 69 C. trachomatis IgG-negative women with TFI, 90 C. trachomatis cHSP60 IgG-positive women with TFI, 73 C. trachomatis cHSP60 IgG-negative women with TFI | IL-12B AC heterozygote increased risk of chlamydial TFI (OR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.23–4.87) | 121 | |
47 women with TFI at IVF clinic in Helsinki, 23 women with C. trachomatis IgG antibodies | IL-10 1082A allele frequency higher in C. trachomatis-positive TFI cases than in C. trachomatis-negative TFI cases (0.72 vs 0.46; P = 0.01) | 118 | |
MICAa | 63 women with TFI at infertility clinic in China, 151 women without TFI, 42 C. trachomatis IgG-positive (determined by commercial immunoassay kits) women with TFI, 59 C. trachomatis IgG-positive women without TFI | MICA*008 higher in infertile patients without C. trachomatis infection than in infertile women with C. trachomatis infection (P = 0.00367; OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.4–3.28); MICA allele protects against C. trachomatis tubal infertility | 154 |
MICA, major histocompatibility complex class I chain-related A.
TLRs recognize and bind to antigens of a pathogen and signal to upregulate an immune response. Ten TLRs have been identified in the human body, and TLR1 to TLR4 are expressed in the female genital tract (109). TLR2 and TLR4 are also expressed on various cells (110). In a prospective genotypic study with female patients attending a sexual health clinic and a fertility clinic in Amsterdam, Netherlands, Karimi et al. (111) demonstrated a possible protective role for a TLR2 haplotype. The haplotype, consisting of two distinct single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), was found to be present in a significantly higher proportion of women with a history of Chlamydia infection who did not have tubal pathology and in sexual health clinic attendees and was present in a higher proportion of women who were asymptomatic (111). In the PEACH PID study TLR1 and TLR4 polymorphisms were found to be significantly associated with chlamydial PID (112), while SNPs from TLR2 (SNPs different from those included in the study of Karimi et al.), TLR6, Myd88, and TIRAP were not significantly associated with chlamydial PID (112).
den Hartog et al. (113) found that the risk of tubal pathology was higher in C. trachomatis IgG-positive women with multiple TLR polymorphisms. That study also showed a trend toward the association of various individual polymorphisms in TLR9 and TLR4 with an increased risk of tubal pathology in C. trachomatis IgG-positive women (113). However, the small sample size in that study makes it difficult to draw a correlation between the polymorphisms and the level of risk of female infertility.
NLRP3, a component of the inflammasome that activates a proinflammatory response, has been found to have polymorphisms reported to result in altered secretion of IL-1β (a proinflammatory cytokine) (114). Several NLRP3 polymorphisms were tested in women prospectively recruited at a sexual health clinic and fertility clinics in Amsterdam; women heterozygous or homozygous with the one of the NLRP3 polymorphisms were at significant risk of developing abdominal pain during C. trachomatis infection (114).
Mannose-binding lectin (MBL) is a proinflammatory protein that activates complement and is locally synthesized in the vagina (115). MBL and MBL promoter polymorphisms have been previously demonstrated to alter the levels of MBL produced (115). It was found that women with TFI who were Chlamydia seropositive more frequently had the low-MBL-producing genotypes than did healthy controls (115). However, this was not the case in an ectopic pregnancy group, who were less likely to have the MBL-deficient genotypes (115). The latter finding sheds some doubt on the role of MBL genotypes, given that it seems likely that the pathology associated with chlamydial ectopic pregnancy is similar to that resulting in chlamydial tubal infertility.
Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II molecules (DR, DQ, and DP) present peptides to CD4 T cells and induce adaptive immunity. DQ polymorphisms were more frequent in women with tubal infertility who were also C. trachomatis seropositive (116), while another polymorphism was negatively associated with C. trachomatis tubal infertility (116). Wang et al. (117) showed that in adolescent females with recurrent chlamydial infections, certain HLA polymorphisms were significantly associated with recurrent infections. A recent study attempted to link different immune genotypes to immunological outcomes by testing a functional role for HLA DQ alleles combined with an IL-10 allele both for frequency in a TFI (Chlamydia-positive) cohort compared to controls and for a lymphocyte proliferative response to cHSP60 (118). The HLA alleles and IL-10 allele were more frequently identified in the chlamydial tubal factor cohort than in the controls; however, the lymphocyte proliferation in response to cHSP60 was not significantly different in relation to the alleles (118). However, in a different study, distinct IL-10 and IFN-γ polymorphisms were found to have a significant impact on lymphocyte proliferation in response to chlamydial antigens (119).
A range of cytokine polymorphisms have been shown to significantly associate with women with C. trachomatis tubal infertility, including IL-10 (120), TNF-α (120), and IL-12 (121). Polymorphisms in IL-1β and receptor genes were not associated with C. trachomatis-related tubal pathology (122). Adolescent females with recurrent chlamydial infections had a lower frequency of three IL-10 promoter polymorphisms (117). Eng et al. (123) demonstrated that a CD14 allele (TLR-4 coreceptor) was associated with increased TNF-α production when whole blood was stimulated with C. trachomatis and C. pneumoniae (124).
While none of these studies were able to account for all chlamydial tubal infertility cases, they are a convincing body of evidence that the human genotype may be a factor in pathology development. It is interesting that most of the studies done to date have focused on immune factors, yet as an obligate intracellular pathogen, Chlamydia has key nutritional, inclusion vacuole, and structural requirements, and therefore, the ability to ascend and cause pathology may, in fact, be independently determined by an as-yet-unknown host genotype that could relate to these nutritional and structural requirements.
PROPOSED MECHANISMS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF INFERTILITY FOLLOWING C. TRACHOMATIS INFECTION IN WOMEN
We describe what we consider to be four mechanisms or processes of host-pathogen interaction that are commonly referred to in the field to explain the process that underlies the development of infertility following Chlamydia infection. The processes are not exclusive of each other, and there is evidence for and against a role for each process. We will briefly summarize these processes so that the host and pathogen data we have reviewed can be considered in the context of each process or mechanism (Fig. 1).
Ascension
It is often suggested or assumed that infection ascends to the upper reproductive tract in only some women, and if it is unchecked, once it is in the upper reproductive tract, it results in the development of tubal pathology. There is considerable direct evidence that a chlamydial infection can ascend beyond the cervix; however, it is not known if ascension occurs without development of tubal pathology. Evidence of ascension includes the detection of Chlamydia DNA in salpingectomy specimens from one woman with ectopic pregnancy and in several endometrial and cervix specimens from women with subsequent ectopic pregnancy although not in their ectopic salpingectomy specimens (125). C. trachomatis DNA was detected in tubal specimens from women with ectopic pregnancy in Myanmar (126). C. trachomatis DNA was detected in the endometrium, fallopian tubes, and ovaries of as many as 56% of women with ectopic pregnancy or TFI (127). The presence of C. trachomatis organisms was associated with endometritis (plasma cell influx in the endometrium) (128, 129). A small study in the United Kingdom identified the presence of C. trachomatis in the upper genital tracts of 4 of 10 women, all of whom had no symptoms (130).
It seems possible or even likely that ascension is independently moderated by numerous other factors that could explain the low frequency of pathology development, supporting the idea that it occurs only in some women. These moderating factors could include host factors such as cycle stage or hormone status at the time of infection, as chlamydial or gonococcal endometritis was found to be more likely to be detected in women in the proliferative phase (94). Equally important moderating factors could include immune status, genotypic factors, other coinfections, or reproductive tract microbiome composition. Unfortunately, there is no published evidence on these factors or direct evidence that ascension does or does not occur. Furthermore, pathogen factors could also moderate the likelihood of ascension, such as the infectious burden (although it has not been possible to significantly associate the chlamydial serovar alone with pathogenic potential or clinical manifestations [131]). Certainly, it seems widely agreed upon that ascension and presence of the pathogen, rather than an indirect process such as molecular mimicry, are involved in pathology development. Yet it seems that ascension of the infection may also occur without pathology, so ascension may not be the primary determinant of pathology.
Persistence
Chlamydia persistence, or the presence of viable but nonculturable chlamydial organisms (visualized as aberrant forms), develops in response to various conditions and can remain dormant for considerable lengths of time (reviewed in reference 132). In this review, we refer to in vivo correlates of the in vitro chlamydial persistent forms that remain indefinitely associated with cells and dormant and able to be reactivated. This is not the same as infections with other microbes that are referred to as “persistent” because the infection failed to respond to antimicrobial treatment. Persistence in vivo has been proposed as a model where this continued presence of the organism in aberrant body forms may drive a long-term pathological immune response resulting in tissue damage to the fallopian tube (certainly, the high expression of the dominant antigen cHSP60 has been detected in laboratory persistence models) (reviewed in reference 133). There are studies that have presented evidence of C. trachomatis DNA or antigens being present in the tubal material of women with tubal infertility or ectopic pregnancy or salpingitis, supporting the idea that organism persistence in some form occurs in vivo (127, 134–136). Recently, morphologies consistent with laboratory models of persistence were observed in endocervix samples associated with IFN-γ, further supporting the likely in vivo relevance of laboratory models of persistence (55). It is difficult to determine if chlamydial persistence leading to pathology has always occurred. Persistent infection may resolve at any time after pathology develops and prior to detection, and given the difficulties of specimen collection from the upper genital tract, the evidence is reasonably compelling that chlamydial persistence (consistent with either the lab models or a distinct in vivo form) is a relevant factor in pathology.
It is important to note a recent review that suggested that some forms of persistence may be “colonization” and in fact not associated with “pathogenesis” and disease (137). Our suggestion is that perhaps the two are distinct and that pathology-associated persistence (given the evidence reviewed here) and separate cases of nondamaging colonization occur. Specifically, the evidence that (i) chlamydial persistence is induced by a range of relevant conditions in vitro (reviewed in references 132 and 133) and (ii) persistence-like morphology and/or chlamydial antigen/DNA detection in the absence of active infection has been observed in clinical samples leads us to feel confident enough to suggest that persistence may be a relevant physiological status in vivo, particularly in the case of ascension to the upper reproductive tract tissues, and therefore likely a factor in a pathological outcome of infection.
Cellular Paradigm
The cellular paradigm mechanism proposes that the Chlamydia-infected epithelium immediately responds to the presence of the Chlamydia or specific antigens from Chlamydia in a proinflammatory manner, typified by proinflammatory cytokines and growth factors, which in turn induces a proinflammatory secondary immune cell activation and migration to form a local lymphoid follicle, resulting in cell damage and fibrosis or scarring (comprehensively presented and reviewed in reference 138). It is important to note that a proinflammatory response is also needed for clearance of the infection, given that the organisms is an intracellular pathogen (139). This mechanism is widely supported by the published evidence of human epithelial and immune cell responses to Chlamydia and a primary tissue ex vivo model that is discussed in more detail below. This mechanism also presumes that chlamydial ascension is associated with pathology and also mutually allows the persistence of Chlamydia in the upper reproductive tract (138). A pathological adaptive memory response proposed as the secondary component of this mechanism is also supported by the existing data that repeat infections increase the likelihood of pathological outcomes in women (83) and by numerous immunological results (as discussed here). However, it is also important to note that repeat infections would induce new acute or innate inflammatory responses that could drive the pathology independent of the secondary phase of the cellular paradigm mechanism.
cHSP60-Induced Delayed Hypersensitivity
There has been considerable focus on a mechanism that involves delayed hypersensitivity and/or molecular mimicry in response to specific chlamydial antigens (reviewed in reference 140). This has largely resulted from a body of literature demonstrating high-titer human antibody responses to cHSP60 in patients with tubal pathology and additionally that, in several animal models, tissue pathology developed after repeated inoculations with cHSP60 protein (reviewed in reference 138). However, this mechanism is a subject of considerable controversy because of inconsistencies between the different published findings, i.e., problems with protein preparations that involved a hypersensitive detergent being used in some animal models and cross-reactivity or poor specificity of some of the antibody tests (141–147). On the other hand, there is no doubt that cHSP60 is a predominant chlamydial antigen that does frequently elicit an immune response. Furthermore, in human trachoma cases, it is frequently possible to observe ongoing follicles present and disease pathology in the absence of PCR-detectable Chlamydia, suggesting that there is continuing immune activity in the absence of the organism during pathology development (148).
Interestingly, one group has proposed that cHSP60 antibodies detected in the follicular fluid of female in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients may induce early destruction of the embryo by cross-reacting to embryo human HSP60 and result in lower transfer success (149). They observed 74.1% cHSP60 seropositivity in women without embryo implantation (n = 47) and 47.9% seropositivity in women with successful embryo implantation (n = 91) (P = 0.0004). However, this observation directly contradicts a finding of a separate and much larger study (n = 1,279) that cumulative IVF cycle pregnancy rates are the same for women who are Chlamydia seropositive and those who are seronegative (150). A study in France also contradicted a possible role for antichlamydial immunity in embryo implantation failure, as it was found that the semen characteristics and IVF pregnancy rate of men and women with either PCR or serological evidence of Chlamydia (n = 52) were not different from those of controls who were negative by chlamydial testing (n = 119) (151).
CONCLUSIONS
A better understanding of the pathogenesis of Chlamydia-associated infertility and the risk factors associated with C. trachomatis infertility would enable specific screening for at-risk women and inform the development of a vaccine designed to prevent the progress of infection to infertility or pathology. While there are several convincing mechanisms that have been presented to explain how the disease pathology occurs, each with some supporting evidence from the human data reviewed here, the actual process or host and pathogen factors that result in infertility remain uncertain and require further investigation. It is clear that a proinflammatory response is largely elicited in response to chlamydial infection. Whether this response or the extent of this response is the primary determinant of pathology remains unclear. Certainly, it is essential to have at least IFN-γ (considered a proinflammatory cytokine) and other proinflammatory activity for successful resolution of the infection. Furthermore, while there are tantalizing associations, there are not yet definitive correlates of the contributions of many host and pathogen factors to pathology risk, including human genetic polymorphisms, C. trachomatis serovar- and genotype-specific distinctions, coinfection or microbiome parameters, and risk behaviors like repeat infections or age at sexual debut (summarized in Fig. 2). A comprehensive and extended longitudinal analysis of each of these factors in a study of a very large cohort of women prior to any infection from the early teen years until postpregnancy age (with adequate statistical power) would be the most robust way to monitor disease factors and pathology outcomes for women (although such a study many not be feasible). Certainly, there is sufficient evidence that primary chlamydial screening is important to prevent PID and TFI. Identification of the major contributing factors to disease pathology would better inform the design of future vaccines and would also enable the design of molecular diagnostics for early detection of women at risk of pathology development.
In the absence of such comprehensive knowledge and subsequent preventive interventions (enhanced diagnosis or vaccine), there is a real opportunity to alleviate some of the risks and costs associated with the pathological outcome of infection by improving guidelines for screening, as recently proposed in the United Kingdom (152). In addition to this, we propose that the improved use of a serological diagnosis of pathology risk, expediting infertility diagnosis for women and also as a tool to predict the risk of ectopic pregnancy or PID in women (20, 150) who have had chlamydial infections, should also be rigorously evaluated and considered for routine implementation in both fertility and general practice clinic settings.
Biographies
Shruti Menon received her B.Sc. (Honors) in Biotechnology from Monash University, Malaysia, in 2011. She is currently pursuing her Ph.D. in microbiology at the Queensland University of Technology. Her project focuses on developing a novel peptide-based serological diagnostic for women with C. trachomatis-related infertility. Her current interests involve chlamydial diagnostics and mechanisms that lead to C. trachomatis-related infertility in women.
Peter Timms obtained his Ph.D. from the University of Queensland, Australia, in 1989 and was made a fellow of the Australian Society for Microbiology in 1991. He joined the Queensland University of Technology in 1991 and rose to the level of full professor in 2003. He moved from the Queensland University of Technology to the University of Sunshine Coast, Australia, where he is a professor of microbiology, in 2014. He has spent 25 years working on all aspects of Chlamydia in both humans and animals. His team has made major discoveries in chlamydial genomics, evolution, vaccine development, and basic mechanisms of pathogenesis.
John A. Allan obtained his M.B.B.S. from the University of Queensland in 1973 and his fellowship in obstetrics and gynecology in 1984. Associate professor John Allan was Director of Reproductive Medicine from 1988 until 2014 at The Wesley Hospital in Brisbane, Australia, and is currently head of the UnitingCare Health Clinical School and Director of Gynecology at The Wesley Hospital. Dr. Allan is a member of the Society of Pelvic Surgeons, and his areas of research have been advanced laparoscopic surgery and investigation of the microbiome of the endometrium, fallopian tubes, and follicular fluid. Dr. Allan developed a technique for freezing spermatozoa in the seminiferous tubule.
Kimberly Alexander is a senior lecturer in the School of Nursing at the Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. She is a registered nurse with a clinical background in oncology. She has a Bachelor of Nursing, a Bachelor of Health Science (Public Health), a Graduate Certificate in Academic Practice, a Masters of Education (Higher Education), and a Ph.D. in epidemiology. Kim has cross-disciplinary research experience in epidemiology, genetics, and nursing with a particular interest in patient-reported outcomes such as symptoms and quality of life.
Luk Rombauts was awarded a Ph.D. in 1993 from the University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, and completed his general obstetrics and gynecology training in 1996. He relocated to Australia in 1999 and successfully completed his subspecialty training in reproductive endocrinology and infertility in 2001. He was appointed Monash IVF Research Director in 2001 and was the Clinical Director of Monash IVF (2003 to 2008) and a Monash IVF Company board member (2010 to 2012). He is an adjunct clinical associate professor in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Monash University. His main research interests include endometriosis and embryo implantation. He is an associate editor of Human Reproduction. Associate professor Rombauts has been a board member of the World Endometriosis Society since 2008 and is the editor of the World Endometriosis Society's electronic journal. In 2011, he was appointed to the World Endometriosis Research Foundation Board of Trustees and to the Board of the Fertility Society of Australia. He is also a member of the RANZCOG Grants and Scholarship Committee.
Paddy Horner has been a consultant at Bristol in genitourinary medicine since 1994 and works at the Bristol Sexual Health Centre. In 2007, he was awarded a Walport Clinical Senior Lectureship at the School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol. He has long-standing research interests in the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of C. trachomatis, Mycoplasma genitalium, and nongonococcal urethritis, on which he has published widely in peer-reviewed journals.
Martin Keltz is a board-certified endocrinologist who established WESTMED Reproductive Services in 2015. Dr. Keltz graduated from Harvard College in 1985 and the NYU School of Medicine in 1989 and completed his obstetrics and gynecology residency at NYU/Bellevue in 1993. Since completing his fellowship in reproductive endocrinology at Yale University in 1995, Dr. Keltz has been director of reproductive endocrinology at St. Luke's and Roosevelt Hospitals, where he is now an associate professor at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai. He cares for couples challenged by infertility and recurrent miscarriage, as well as women suffering with fibroids, endometriosis, or any reproductive disorder. His busy practice focuses on in vitro fertilization, sonohysterography, intrauterine insemination, and minimally invasive hysteroscopy and laparoscopy. Dr. Keltz has been named the top reproductive endocrinologist by New York Magazine for the years 2012, 2013, and 2014. He has authored over 40 peer-reviewed articles and 50 abstracts in reproductive medicine.
Jane S. Hocking is an epidemiologist with a particular interest in the epidemiology and control of genital C. trachomatis infection. Dr. Hocking is a professor at the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, where she is head of the Sexual Health Unit in the Melbourne School of Population and Global Health. She obtained a Master of Public Health in 1998 and a Ph.D. in 2005, both from the University of Melbourne. As part of her Ph.D., she generated Australia's first population-based estimates of genital chlamydia prevalence among young women aged 18 to 25 years. She has subsequently provided Australia's first estimates of chlamydia incidence and reinfection rates among young women. She is currently leading a world first chlamydia screening randomized controlled trial of a chlamydia testing intervention in general practice that aims to determine whether chlamydia screening is cost-effective and should be introduced in Australia. She is also interested in the efficacy of treatment for chlamydia.
Wilhelmina (Willa) M. Huston is a senior lecturer at the Queensland University of Technology. Her Ph.D. was completed at the University of Queensland (conferred in 2004). She held a postdoctoral fellowship in the United Kingdom at the University of York from 2003 to 2005 and returned to Australia in 2005 as a postdoctoral fellow at the Queensland University of Technology in the field of Chlamydia research (2005 to 2007). She has received an NHMRC Peter Doherty fellowship (2007 to 2010) and held lecturer (2011) and senior lecturer (2012) positions at the Queensland University of Technology. Dr. Huston is interested in the molecular microbiology of the human intracellular pathogen Chlamydia and how we can better understand the pathogenesis mechanisms of this organism, leading to better treatment and diagnosis. Dr. Huston has been in the Chlamydia research field since 2005.
REFERENCES
- 1.WHO. 2005. Prevalence and incidence of selected sexually transmitted infections. Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, syphilis and Trichomonas vaginalis: methods and results used by WHO to generate 2005 estimates. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789241502450_eng.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 2.CDC. 2013. Incidence, prevalence, and cost of sexually transmitted infections in the United States. http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats/sti-estimates-fact-sheet-feb-2013.pdf CDC, Atlanta, GA. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Land JA, Evers J. 2002. Chlamydia infection and subfertility. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 16:901–912. doi: 10.1053/beog.2002.0319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Horn M, Collingro A, Schmitz-Esser S, Beier CL, Purkhold U, Fartmann B, Brandt P, Nyakatura GJ, Droege M, Frishman D, Rattei T, Mewes HW, Wagner M. 2004. Illuminating the evolutionary history of chlamydiae. Science 304:728–730. doi: 10.1126/science.1096330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Peipert JF. 2003. Clinical practice. Genital chlamydial infections. N Engl J Med 349:2424–2430. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp030542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lewis D, Newton DC, Guy RJ, Ali H, Chen MY, Fairley CK, Hocking JS. 2012. The prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Australia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis 12:113. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sonnenberg P, Clifton S, Beddows S, Field N, Soldan K, Tanton C, Mercer CH, da Silva FC, Alexander S, Copas AJ, Phelps A, Erens B, Prah P, Macdowall W, Wellings K, Ison CA, Johnson AM. 2013. Prevalence, risk factors, and uptake of interventions for sexually transmitted infections in Britain: findings from the national surveys of sexual attitudes and lifestyles (Natsal). Lancet 382:1795–1806. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61947-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Datta SD, Sternberg M, Johnson RE, Berman S, Papp JR, McQuillan G, Weinstock H. 2007. Gonorrhea and chlamydia in the United States among persons 14 to 39 years of age, 1999 to 2002. Ann Intern Med 147:89–96. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-2-200707170-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Datta SD, Torrone E, Kruszon-Moran D, Berman S, Johnson R, Satterwhite CL, Papp J, Weinstock H. 2012. Chlamydia trachomatis trends in the United States among persons 14 to 39 years of age, 1999–2008. Sex Transm Dis 39:92–96. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31823e2ff7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Price MJ, Ades AE, de Angelis D, Welton NJ, Macleod J, Turner K, Horner PJ. 2014. Incidence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women in England: two methods of estimation. Epidemiol Infect 142:562–576. doi: 10.1017/S0950268813001027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wallace LA, Scoular A, Hart G, Reid M, Wilson P, Goldberg DJ. 2008. What is the excess risk of infertility in women after genital chlamydia infection? A systematic review of the evidence. Sex Transm Infect 84:171–175. doi: 10.1136/sti.2007.026047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Weström L, Joesoef R, Reynolds G, Hadgu A, Tompson SE. 1992. Pelvic inflammatory disease and fertility. A cohort study of 1844 women with laparoscopically verified disease and 657 control women with normal laparoscopic results. Sex Transm Dis 19:185–192. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Oakeshott P, Kerry S, Aghaizu A, Atherton H, Hay S, Taylor-Robinson D, Simms I, Hay P. 2010. Randomised controlled trial of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease: the POPI (prevention of pelvic infection) trial. BMJ 340:c1642. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Herzog SA, Althaus CL, Heijne JC, Oakeshott P, Kerry S, Hay P, Low N. 2012. Timing of progression from Chlamydia trachomatis infection to pelvic inflammatory disease: a mathematical modelling study. BMC Infect Dis 12:187. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Price MJ, Ades AE, De Angelis D, Welton NJ, Macleod J, Soldan K, Simms I, Turner K, Horner PJ. 2013. Risk of pelvic inflammatory disease following Chlamydia trachomatis infection: analysis of prospective studies with a multistate model. Am J Epidemiol 178:484–492. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Low N, Egger M, Sterne JA, Harbord RM, Ibrahim F, Lindblom B, Herrmann B. 2006. Incidence of severe reproductive tract complications associated with diagnosed genital chlamydial infection: the Uppsala Women's Cohort Study. Sex Transm Infect 82:212–218. doi: 10.1136/sti.2005.017186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Broeze KA, Opmeer BC, Coppus SF, Van Geloven N, Alves MF, Anestad G, Bhattacharya S, Allan J, Guerra-Infante MF, den Hartog JE, Land JA, Idahl A, Van der Linden PJ, Mouton JW, Ng EH, Van der Steeg JW, Steures P, Svenstrup HF, Tiitinen A, Toye B, Van der Veen F, Mol BW. 2011. Chlamydia antibody testing and diagnosing tubal pathology in subfertile women: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 17:301–310. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmq060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Eggert-Kruse W, Rohr G, Demirakca T, Rusu R, Naher H, Petzoldt D, Runnebaum B. 1997. Chlamydial serology in 1303 asymptomatic subfertile couples. Hum Reprod 12:1464–1475. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.7.1464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Akande VA, Hunt LP, Cahill DJ, Caul EO, Ford WC, Jenkins JM. 2003. Tubal damage in infertile women: prediction using chlamydia serology. Hum Reprod 18:1841–1847. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Keltz MD, Gera PS, Moustakis M. 2006. Chlamydia serology screening in infertility patients. Fertil Steril 85:752–754. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.08.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Muvunyi CM, Dhont N, Verhelst R, Temmerman M, Claeys G, Padalko E. 2011. Chlamydia trachomatis infection in fertile and subfertile women in Rwanda: prevalence and diagnostic significance of IgG and IgA antibodies testing. Hum Reprod 26:3319–3326. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Coppus SF, Opmeer BC, Logan S, van der Veen F, Bhattacharya S, Mol BW. 2007. The predictive value of medical history taking and Chlamydia IgG ELISA antibody testing (CAT) in the selection of subfertile women for diagnostic laparoscopy: a clinical prediction model approach. Hum Reprod 22:1353–1358. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Claman P, Honey L, Peeling RW, Jessamine P, Toye B. 1997. The presence of serum antibody to the chlamydial heat shock protein (CHSP60) as a diagnostic test for tubal factor infertility. Fertil Steril 67:501–504. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)80077-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tiitinen A, Surcel HM, Halttunen M, Birkelund S, Bloigu A, Christiansen G, Koskela P, Morrison SG, Morrison RP, Paavonen J. 2006. Chlamydia trachomatis and chlamydial heat shock protein 60-specific antibody and cell-mediated responses predict tubal factor infertility. Hum Reprod 21:1533–1538. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Price MJ, Ades AE, Welton NJ, Macleod J, Turner K, Simms I, Horner PJ. 2012. How much tubal factor infertility is caused by Chlamydia? Estimates based on serological evidence corrected for sensitivity and specificity. Sex Transm Dis 39:608–613. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3182572475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Stary G, Olive A, Radovic-Moreno AF, Gondek D, Alvarez D, Basto PA, Perro M, Vrbanac VD, Tager AM, Shi J, Yethon JA, Farokhzad OC, Langer R, Starnbach MN, von Andrian UH. 2015. VACCINES. A mucosal vaccine against Chlamydia trachomatis generates two waves of protective memory T cells. Science 348:aaa8205. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa8205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mylonas I. 2012. Female genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection: where are we heading? Arch Gynecol Obstet 285:1271–1285. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2240-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Xiong L, Kong F, Zhou H, Gilbert GL. 2006. Use of PCR and reverse line blot hybridization assay for rapid simultaneous detection and serovar identification of Chlamydia trachomatis. J Clin Microbiol 44:1413–1418. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.4.1413-1418.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Jurstrand M, Falk L, Fredlund H, Lindberg M, Olcen P, Andersson S, Persson K, Albert J, Backman A. 2001. Characterization of Chlamydia trachomatis omp1 genotypes among sexually transmitted disease patients in Sweden. J Clin Microbiol 39:3915–3919. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.11.3915-3919.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gao X, Chen XS, Yin YP, Zhong MY, Shi MQ, Wei WH, Chen Q, Peeling RW, Mabey D. 2007. Distribution study of Chlamydia trachomatis serovars among high-risk women in China performed using PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism genotyping. J Clin Microbiol 45:1185–1189. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02076-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Quint KD, van Doorn LJ, Kleter B, de Koning MN, van den Munckhof HA, Morre SA, ter Harmsel B, Weiderpass E, Harbers G, Melchers WJ, Quint WG. 2007. A highly sensitive, multiplex broad-spectrum PCR-DNA-enzyme immunoassay and reverse hybridization assay for rapid detection and identification of Chlamydia trachomatis serovars. J Mol Diagn 9:631–638. doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2007.070011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Walker J, Tabrizi SN, Fairley CK, Chen MY, Bradshaw CS, Twin J, Taylor N, Donovan B, Kaldor JM, McNamee K, Urban E, Walker S, Currie M, Birden H, Bowden F, Gunn J, Pirotta M, Gurrin L, Harindra V, Garland SM, Hocking JS. 2012. Chlamydia trachomatis incidence and re-infection among young women—behavioural and microbiological characteristics. PLoS One 7:e37778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lan J, Melgers I, Meijer CJ, Walboomers JM, Roosendaal R, Burger C, Bleker OP, van den Brule AJ. 1995. Prevalence and serovar distribution of asymptomatic cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infections as determined by highly sensitive PCR. J Clin Microbiol 33:3194–3197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Verweij SP, Lanjouw E, Bax CJ, Quint KD, Oostvogel PM, Dorr PJ, Pleijster J, de Vries HJ, Peters RP, Ouburg S, Morre SA. 2014. Serovar D and E of serogroup B induce highest serological responses in urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infections. BMC Infect Dis 14:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Morré SA, van den Brule AJ, Rozendaal L, Boeke AJ, Voorhorst FJ, de Blok S, Meijer CJ. 2002. The natural course of asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infections: 45% clearance and no development of clinical PID after one-year follow-up. Int J STD AIDS 13(Suppl 2):S12–S18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Risser WL, Risser JM. 2007. The incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease in untreated women infected with Chlamydia trachomatis: a structured review. Int J STD AIDS 18:727–731. doi: 10.1258/095646207782212351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Simms I, Horner P. 2008. Has the incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease following chlamydial infection been overestimated? Int J STD AIDS 19:285–286. doi: 10.1258/ijsa.2007.007316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Geisler WM, Morrison SG, Doemland ML, Iqbal SM, Su J, Mancevski A, Hook EW III, Morrison RP. 2012. Immunoglobulin-specific responses to Chlamydia elementary bodies in individuals with and at risk for genital chlamydial infection. J Infect Dis 206:1836–1843. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Morrison RP. 2000. Differential sensitivities of Chlamydia trachomatis strains to inhibitory effects of gamma interferon. Infect Immun 68:6038–6040. doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.10.6038-6040.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Nelson DE, Virok DP, Wood H, Roshick C, Johnson RM, Whitmire WM, Crane DD, Steele-Mortimer O, Kari L, McClarty G, Caldwell HD. 2005. Chlamydial IFN-gamma immune evasion is linked to host infection tropism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:10658–10663. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504198102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Borges V, Nunes A, Ferreira R, Borrego MJ, Gomes JP. 2012. Directional evolution of Chlamydia trachomatis towards niche-specific adaptation. J Bacteriol 194:6143–6153. doi: 10.1128/JB.01291-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Jeffrey BM, Suchland RJ, Quinn KL, Davidson JR, Stamm WE, Rockey DD. 2010. Genome sequencing of recent clinical Chlamydia trachomatis strains identifies loci associated with tissue tropism and regions of apparent recombination. Infect Immun 78:2544–2553. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01324-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Muraille E, Leo O. 1998. Revisiting the Th1/Th2 paradigm. Scand J Immunol 47:1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Mascellino MT, Boccia P, Oliva A. 2011. Immunopathogenesis in Chlamydia trachomatis infected women. ISRN Obstet Gynecol 2011:436936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Perry LL, Feilzer K, Caldwell HD. 1997. Immunity to Chlamydia trachomatis is mediated by T helper 1 cells through IFN-gamma-dependent and -independent pathways. J Immunol 158:3344–3352. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Khader SA, Gopal R. 2010. IL-17 in protective immunity to intracellular pathogens. Virulence 1:423–427. doi: 10.4161/viru.1.5.12862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Arno JN, Ricker VA, Batteiger BE, Katz BP, Caine VA, Jones RB. 1990. Interferon-gamma in endocervical secretions of women infected with Chlamydia trachomatis. J Infect Dis 162:1385–1389. doi: 10.1093/infdis/162.6.1385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Spear GT, Kendrick SR, Chen HY, Thomas TT, Bahk M, Balderas R, Ghosh S, Weinberg A, Landay AL. 2011. Multiplex immunoassay of lower genital tract mucosal fluid from women attending an urban STD clinic shows broadly increased IL1β and lactoferrin. PLoS One 6:e19560. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Agrawal T, Vats V, Salhan S, Mittal A. 2007. Mucosal and peripheral immune responses to chlamydial heat shock proteins in women infected with Chlamydia trachomatis. Clin Exp Immunol 148:461–468. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2007.03357.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Jha R, Srivastava P, Salhan S, Finckh A, Gabay C, Mittal A, Bas S. 2011. Spontaneous secretion of interleukin-17 and -22 by human cervical cells in Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Microbes Infect 13:167–178. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2010.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kelly KA, Wiley D, Wiesmeier E, Briskin M, Butch A, Darville T. 2009. The combination of the gastrointestinal integrin (α4β7) and selectin ligand enhances T-cell migration to the reproductive tract during infection with Chlamydia trachomatis. Am J Reprod Immunol 61:446–452. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2009.00705.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Agrawal T, Bhengraj AR, Vats V, Salhan S, Mittal A. 2011. Expression of TLR 2, TLR 4 and iNOS in cervical monocytes of Chlamydia trachomatis-infected women and their role in host immune response. Am J Reprod Immunol 66:534–543. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2011.01064.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gupta R, Vardhan H, Srivastava P, Salhan S, Mittal A. 2009. Modulation of cytokines and transcription factors (T-Bet and GATA3) in CD4 enriched cervical cells of Chlamydia trachomatis infected fertile and infertile women upon stimulation with chlamydial inclusion membrane proteins B and C. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 7:84. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-7-84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Balasubramaniam ES, Van Noorden S, El-Bahrawy M. 2012. The expression of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8 and their receptors in fallopian tubes with ectopic tubal gestation. Fertil Steril 98:898–894. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Lewis ME, Belland RJ, AbdelRahman YM, Beatty WL, Aiyar AA, Zea AH, Greene SJ, Marrero L, Buckner LR, Tate DJ, McGowin CL, Kozlowski PA, O'Brien M, Lillis RA, Martin DH, Quayle AJ. 2014. Morphologic and molecular evaluation of Chlamydia trachomatis growth in human endocervix reveals distinct growth patterns. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 4:71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Hvid M, Baczynska A, Deleuran B, Fedder J, Knudsen HJ, Christiansen G, Birkelund S. 2007. Interleukin-1 is the initiator of fallopian tube destruction during Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Cell Microbiol 9:2795–2803. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.00996.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Shaw JL, Wills GS, Lee KF, Horner PJ, McClure MO, Abrahams VM, Wheelhouse N, Jabbour HN, Critchley HO, Entrican G, Horne AW. 2011. Chlamydia trachomatis infection increases fallopian tube PROKR2 via TLR2 and NFkappaB activation resulting in a microenvironment predisposed to ectopic pregnancy. Am J Pathol 178:253–260. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2010.11.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Kinnunen A, Molander P, Laurila A, Rantala I, Morrison R, Lehtinen M, Karttunen R, Tiitinen A, Paavonen J, Surcel HM. 2000. Chlamydia trachomatis reactive T lymphocytes from upper genital tract tissue specimens. Hum Reprod 15:1484–1489. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.7.1484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Rasmussen SJ, Eckmann L, Quayle AJ, Shen L, Zhang Y-X, Anderson DJ, Fierer J, Stephens RS, Kagnoff MF. 1997. Secretion of proinflammatory cytokines by epithelial cells in response to Chlamydia infection suggests a central role for epithelial cells in chlamydial pathogenesis. J Clin Invest 99:77–87. doi: 10.1172/JCI119136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kinnunen A, Surcel HM, Halttunen M, Tiitinen A, Morrison RP, Morrison SG, Koskela P, Lehtinen M, Paavonen J. 2003. Chlamydia trachomatis heat shock protein-60 induced interferon-gamma and interleukin-10 production in infertile women. Clin Exp Immunol 131:299–303. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2003.02048.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Schrader S, Klos A, Hess S, Zeidler H, Kuipers JG, Rihl M. 2007. Expression of inflammatory host genes in Chlamydia trachomatis-infected human monocytes. Arthritis Res Ther 9:54–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Debattista J, Timms P, Allan J. 2002. Reduced levels of gamma-interferon secretion in response to chlamydial 60 kDa heat shock protein amongst women with pelvic inflammatory disease and a history of repeated Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Immunol Lett 81:205–210. doi: 10.1016/S0165-2478(02)00036-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Debattista J, Gazzard CM, Wood R, Allan JA, Allan JM, Scarman A, Mortlock M, Timms P, Knox CL. 2004. Interactions of microbiology and pathology in women undergoing investigations for infertility. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 12:135–145. doi: 10.1080/10647440400020703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Gervassi A, Alderson MR, Suchland R, Maisonneuve JF, Grabstein KH, Probst P. 2004. Differential regulation of inflammatory cytokine secretion by human dendritic cells upon Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Infect Immun 72:7231–7239. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.12.7231-7239.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Matyszak MK, Young JL, Gaston JS. 2002. Uptake and processing of Chlamydia trachomatis by human dendritic cells. Eur J Immunol 32:742–751. doi:. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Hook CE, Telyatnikova N, Goodall JC, Braud VM, Carmichael AJ, Wills MR, Gaston JS. 2004. Effects of Chlamydia trachomatis infection on the expression of natural killer (NK) cell ligands and susceptibility to NK cell lysis. Clin Exp Immunol 138:54–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2004.02596.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Cohen CR, Koochesfahani KM, Meier AS, Shen C, Karunakaran K, Ondondo B, Kinyari T, Mugo NR, Nguti R, Brunham RC. 2005. Immunoepidemiologic profile of Chlamydia trachomatis infection: importance of heat-shock protein 60 and interferon-gamma. J Infect Dis 192:591–599. doi: 10.1086/432070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Cunningham K, Stansfield SH, Patel P, Menon S, Kienzle V, Allan JA, Huston WM. 2013. The IL-6 response to Chlamydia from primary reproductive epithelial cells is highly variable and may be involved in differential susceptibility to the immunopathological consequences of chlamydial infection. BMC Immunol 14:50. doi: 10.1186/1471-2172-14-50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Wyrick PB, Davis CH, Knight ST, Choong J, Raulston JE, Schramm N. 1993. An in vitro human epithelial cell culture system for studying the pathogenesis of Chlamydia trachomatis. Sex Transm Dis 20:248–256. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199309000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Cheng W, Shivshankar P, Zhong Y, Chen D, Li Z, Zhong G. 2008. Intracellular interleukin-1alpha mediates interleukin-8 production induced by Chlamydia trachomatis infection via a mechanism independent of type I interleukin-1 receptor. Infect Immun 76:942–951. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01313-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Mpiga P, Mansour S, Morisset R, Beaulieu R, Ravaoarinoro M. 2006. Sustained interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 expression following infection with Chlamydia trachomatis serovar L2 in a HeLa/THP-1 cell co-culture model. Scand J Immunol 63:199–207. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2006.01734.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Dessus-Babus S, Darville TL, Cuozzo FP, Ferguson K, Wyrick PB. 2002. Differences in innate immune responses (in vitro) to HeLa cells infected with nondisseminating serovar E and disseminating serovar L2 of Chlamydia trachomatis. Infect Immun 70:3234–3248. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.6.3234-3248.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Humphrys MS, Creasy T, Sun Y, Shetty AC, Chibucos MC, Drabek EF, Fraser CM, Farooq U, Sengamalay N, Ott S, Shou H, Bavoil PM, Mahurkar A, Myers GS. 2013. Simultaneous transcriptional profiling of bacteria and their host cells. PLoS One 8:e80597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Shemer-Avni Y, Wallach D, Sarov I. 1988. Inhibition of Chlamydia trachomatis growth by recombinant tumor necrosis factor. Infect Immun 56:2503–2506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Lu H, Shen C, Brunham RC. 2000. Chlamydia trachomatis infection of epithelial cells induces the activation of caspase-1 and release of mature IL-18. J Immunol 165:1463–1469. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.3.1463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.González E, Rother M, Kerr MC, Al-Zeer MA, Abu-Lubad M, Kessler M, Brinkmann V, Loewer A, Meyer TF. 2014. Chlamydia infection depends on a functional MDM2-p53 axis. Nat Commun 5:5201. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Siegl C, Prusty BK, Karunakaran K, Wischhusen J, Rudel T. 2014. Tumor suppressor p53 alters host cell metabolism to limit Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Cell Rep 9:918–929. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Hosenfeld CB, Workowski KA, Berman S, Zaidi A, Dyson J, Mosure D, Bolan G, Bauer HM. 2009. Repeat infection with Chlamydia and gonorrhea among females: a systematic review of the literature. Sex Transm Dis 36:478–489. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181a2a933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Batteiger BE, Tu W, Ofner S, Van Der Pol B, Stothard DR, Orr DP, Katz BP, Fortenberry JD. 2010. Repeated Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections in adolescent women. J Infect Dis 201:42–51. doi: 10.1086/648734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Brunham RC, Pourbohloul B, Mak S, White R, Rekart ML. 2005. The unexpected impact of a Chlamydia trachomatis infection control program on susceptibility to reinfection. J Infect Dis 192:1836–1844. doi: 10.1086/497341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Scott Lamontagne D, Baster K, Emmett L, Nichols T, Randall S, McLean L, Meredith P, Harindra V, Tobin JM, Underhill GS, Graham Hewitt W, Hopwood J, Gleave T, Ghosh AK, Mallinson H, Davies AR, Hughes G, Fenton KA, Chlamydia Recall Study Advisory Group. 2007. Incidence and reinfection rates of genital chlamydial infection among women aged 16–24 years attending general practice, family planning and genitourinary medicine clinics in England: a prospective cohort study by the Chlamydia Recall Study Advisory Group. Sex Transm Infect 83:292–303. doi: 10.1136/sti.2006.022053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Geisler WM, Lensing SY, Press CG, Hook EW III. 2013. Spontaneous resolution of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women and protection from reinfection. J Infect Dis 207:1850–1856. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Hillis SD, Owens LM, Marchbanks PA, Amsterdam LF, Mac Kenzie WR. 1997. Recurrent chlamydial infections increase the risks of hospitalization for ectopic pregnancy and pelvic inflammatory disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 176:103–107. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(97)80020-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Horner PJ. 2012. Azithromycin antimicrobial resistance and genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection: duration of therapy may be the key to improving efficacy. Sex Transm Infect 88:154–156. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2011-050385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Dreses-Werringloer U, Padubrin I, Zeidler H, Kohler L. 2001. Effects of azithromycin and rifampin on Chlamydia trachomatis infection in vitro. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45:3001–3008. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.11.3001-3008.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Suchland RJ, Geisler WM, Stamm WE. 2003. Methodologies and cell lines used for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Chlamydia spp. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47:636–642. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.2.636-642.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Bhengraj AR, Vardhan H, Srivastava P, Salhan S, Mittal A. 2010. Decreased susceptibility to azithromycin and doxycycline in clinical isolates of Chlamydia trachomatis obtained from recurrently infected female patients in India. Chemotherapy 56:371–377. doi: 10.1159/000314998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Brunham RC, Rekart ML. 2008. The arrested immunity hypothesis and the epidemiology of Chlamydia control. Sex Transm Dis 35:53–54. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31815e41a3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Brunham RC, Rey-Ladino J. 2005. Immunology of Chlamydia infection: implications for a Chlamydia trachomatis vaccine. Nat Rev Immunol 5:149–161. doi: 10.1038/nri1551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Dicker LW, Mosure DJ, Berman SM, Levine WC. 2003. Gonorrhea prevalence and coinfection with chlamydia in women in the United States, 2000. Sex Transm Dis 30:472–476. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200305000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.De Muylder X, Laga M, Tennstedt C, Van Dyck E, Aelbers GN, Piot P. 1990. The role of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis in pelvic inflammatory disease and its sequelae in Zimbabwe. J Infect Dis 162:501–505. doi: 10.1093/infdis/162.2.501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Shimano S, Nishikawa A, Sonoda T, Kudo R. 2004. Analysis of the prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and Chlamydia trachomatis infection in 6083 pregnant women at a hospital in Otaru, Japan. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 30:230–236. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2004.00181.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Wiesenfeld HC, Hillier SL, Krohn MA, Landers DV, Sweet RL. 2003. Bacterial vaginosis is a strong predictor of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Clin Infect Dis 36:663–668. doi: 10.1086/367658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Korn AP, Hessol NA, Padian NS, Bolan GA, Donegan E, Landers DV, Schachter J. 1998. Risk factors for plasma cell endometritis among women with cervical Neisseria gonorrhoeae, cervical Chlamydia trachomatis, or bacterial vaginosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 178:987–990. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70536-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Joesoef MR, Wiknjosastro G, Norojono W, Sumampouw H, Linnan M, Hansell MJ, Hillis SE, Lewis J. 1996. Coinfection with chlamydia and gonorrhoea among pregnant women and bacterial vaginosis. Int J STD AIDS 7:61–64. doi: 10.1258/0956462961917096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.da Silva CS, Adad SJ, Hazarabedian de Souza MA, Macedo Barcelos AC, Sarreta Terra AP, Murta EF. 2004. Increased frequency of bacterial vaginosis and Chlamydia trachomatis in pregnant women with human papillomavirus infection. Gynecol Obstet Invest 58:189–193. doi: 10.1159/000079822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Gong Z, Luna Y, Yu P, Fan H. 2014. Lactobacilli inactivate Chlamydia trachomatis through lactic acid but not H2O2. PLoS One 9:e107758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Caldwell HD, Wood H, Crane C, Bailey R, Jones RB, Mabey D, Maclean I, Mohammed Z, Peeling R, Roshick C, Schachter J, Solomon AW, Stamm WE, Suchland RJ, Taylor L, West SK, Quinn TC, Belland RJ, McClarty G. 2003. Polymorphisms in Chlamydia trachomatis tryptophan synthase genes differentiate between genital and ocular isolates. J Clin Invest 111:1757–1769. doi: 10.1172/JCI17993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Taylor BD, Darville T, Haggerty CL. 2013. Does bacterial vaginosis cause pelvic inflammatory disease? Sex Transm Dis 40:117–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Arno JN, Katz BP, McBride R, Carty GA, Batteiger BE, Caine VA, Jones RB. 1994. Age and clinical immunity to infections with Chlamydia trachomatis. Sex Transm Dis 21:47–52. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199401000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Bender N, Herrmann B, Andersen B, Hocking JS, van Bergen J, Morgan J, van den Broek IV, Zwahlen M, Low N. 2011. Chlamydia infection, pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy and infertility: cross-national study. Sex Transm Infect 87:601–608. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2011-050205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Barnes RC, Katz BP, Rolfs RT, Batteiger B, Caine V, Jones RB. 1990. Quantitative culture of endocervical Chlamydia trachomatis. J Clin Microbiol 28:774–780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Macleod J, Salisbury C, Low N, McCarthy A, Sterne JA, Holloway A, Patel R, Sanford E, Morcom A, Horner P, Davey Smith G, Skidmore S, Herring A, Caul O, Hobbs FD, Egger M. 2005. Coverage and uptake of systematic postal screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis and prevalence of infection in the United Kingdom general population: cross sectional study. BMJ 330:940. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38413.663137.8F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Skjeldestad FE, Marsico MA, Sings HL, Nordbo SA, Storvold G. 2009. Incidence and risk factors for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection: a 4-year prospective cohort study. Sex Transm Dis 36:273–279. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181924386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Okumu CV, Kamau RK, Rogo KO. 1990. Past reproductive and sexual characteristics of women with tubal infertility at Kenyatta National Hospital. East Afr Med J 67:864–872. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Brabin L, Fairbrother E, Mandal D, Roberts SA, Higgins SP, Chandiok S, Wood P, Barnard G, Kitchener HC. 2005. Biological and hormonal markers of chlamydia, human papillomavirus, and bacterial vaginosis among adolescents attending genitourinary medicine clinics. Sex Transm Infect 81:128–132. doi: 10.1136/sti.2004.010223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Farrow A, Hull MG, Northstone K, Taylor H, Ford WC, Golding J. 2002. Prolonged use of oral contraception before a planned pregnancy is associated with a decreased risk of delayed conception. Hum Reprod 17:2754–2761. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.10.2754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Lal JA, Malogajski J, Verweij SP, de Boer P, Ambrosino E, Brand A, Ouburg S, Morre SA. 2013. Chlamydia trachomatis infections and subfertility: opportunities to translate host pathogen genomic data into public health. Public Health Genomics 16:50–61. doi: 10.1159/000346207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Yu L, Wang L, Chen S. 2009. Toll-like receptors, inflammation and tumor in the human female reproductive tract. Am J Reprod Immunol 62:1–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2009.00712.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Laisk T, Peters M, Saare M, Haller-Kikkatalo K, Karro H, Salumets A. 2010. Association of CCR5, TLR2, TLR4 and MBL genetic variations with genital tract infections and tubal factor infertility. J Reprod Immunol 87:74–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2010.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Karimi O, Ouburg S, de Vries HJ, Pena AS, Pleijster J, Land JA, Morre SA. 2009. TLR2 haplotypes in the susceptibility to and severity of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in Dutch women. Drugs Today (Barc) 45(Suppl B):67–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Taylor BD, Darville T, Ferrell RE, Kammerer CM, Ness RB, Haggerty CL. 2012. Variants in Toll-like receptor 1 and 4 genes are associated with Chlamydia trachomatis among women with pelvic inflammatory disease. J Infect Dis 205:603–609. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.den Hartog JE, Ouburg S, Land JA, Lyons JM, Ito JI, Pena AS, Morre SA. 2006. Do host genetic traits in the bacterial sensing system play a role in the development of Chlamydia trachomatis-associated tubal pathology in subfertile women? BMC Infect Dis 6:122. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-6-122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Wang W, Stassen FR, Surcel HM, Ohman H, Tiitinen A, Paavonen J, de Vries HJ, Heijmans R, Pleijster J, Morre SA, Ouburg S. 2009. Analyses of polymorphisms in the inflammasome-associated NLRP3 and miRNA-146A genes in the susceptibility to and tubal pathology of Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Drugs Today (Barc) 45(Suppl B):95–103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Laisk T, Peters M, Salumets A. 2011. Mannose-binding lectin genotypes: potential role in tubal damage and adverse IVF outcome. J Reprod Immunol 92:62–67. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2011.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Cohen CR, Gichui J, Rukaria R, Sinei SS, Gaur LK, Brunham RC. 2003. Immunogenetic correlates for Chlamydia trachomatis-associated tubal infertility. Obstet Gynecol 101:438–444. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(02)03077-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Wang C, Tang J, Geisler WM, Crowley-Nowick PA, Wilson CM, Kaslow RA. 2005. Human leukocyte antigen and cytokine gene variants as predictors of recurrent Chlamydia trachomatis infection in high-risk adolescents. J Infect Dis 191:1084–1092. doi: 10.1086/428592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Kinnunen AH, Surcel HM, Lehtinen M, Karhukorpi J, Tiitinen A, Halttunen M, Bloigu A, Morrison RP, Karttunen R, Paavonen J. 2002. HLA DQ alleles and interleukin-10 polymorphism associated with Chlamydia trachomatis-related tubal factor infertility: a case-control study. Hum Reprod 17:2073–2078. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.8.2073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Ohman H, Tiitinen A, Halttunen M, Paavonen J, Surcel HM. 2011. Cytokine gene polymorphism and Chlamydia trachomatis-specific immune responses. Hum Immunol 72:278–282. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2010.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Ohman H, Tiitinen A, Halttunen M, Lehtinen M, Paavonen J, Surcel HM. 2009. Cytokine polymorphisms and severity of tubal damage in women with Chlamydia-associated infertility. J Infect Dis 199:1353–1359. doi: 10.1086/597620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Ohman H, Bailey R, Natividad A, Ragoussis J, Johnson LL, Tiitinen A, Halttunen M, Paavonen J, Surcel HM. 2012. Effect of IL12A and IL12B polymorphisms on the risk of Chlamydia trachomatis-induced tubal factor infertility and disease severity. Hum Reprod 27:2217–2223. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Murillo LS, Land JA, Pleijster J, Bruggeman CA, Pena AS, Morre SA. 2003. Interleukin-1B (IL-1B) and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RN) gene polymorphisms are not associated with tubal pathology and Chlamydia trachomatis-related tubal factor subfertility. Hum Reprod 18:2309–2314. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Eng HL, Wang CH, Chen CH, Chou MH, Cheng CT, Lin TM. 2004. A CD14 promoter polymorphism is associated with CD14 expression and Chlamydia-stimulated TNF alpha production. Genes Immun 5:426–430. doi: 10.1038/sj.gene.6364100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Eng HL, Chen CH, Kuo CC, Wu JS, Wang CH, Lin TM. 2003. Association of CD14 promoter gene polymorphism and Chlamydia pneumoniae infection. J Infect Dis 188:90–97. doi: 10.1086/375744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Lan J, van den Brule AJ, Hemrika DJ, Risse EK, Walboomers JM, Schipper ME, Meijer CJ. 1995. Chlamydia trachomatis and ectopic pregnancy: retrospective analysis of salpingectomy specimens, endometrial biopsies, and cervical smears. J Clin Pathol 48:815–819. doi: 10.1136/jcp.48.9.815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Khin-Nwe-Oo, Wah-Wah-Aung, Moe-Thida, Khin-Thet-Wai, Hta-Hta-Yi, Win-Win-Mya. 2011. Case-control study of ectopic pregnancies in Myanmar: infectious etiological factors. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 42:347–354. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Barlow RE, Cooke ID, Odukoya O, Heatley MK, Jenkins J, Narayansingh G, Ramsewak SS, Eley A. 2001. The prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis in fresh tissue specimens from patients with ectopic pregnancy or tubal factor infertility as determined by PCR and in-situ hybridisation. J Med Microbiol 50:902–908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Mårdh PA, Moller BR, Ingerselv HJ, Nussler E, Weström L, Wolner-Hanssen P. 1981. Endometritis caused by Chlamydia trachomatis. Br J Vener Dis 57:191–195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Mårdh PA, Wolner-Hanssen P. 1982. Three novel manifestations of Chlamydia trachomatis infection-endometritis, perihepatitis and meningoencephalitis. Infection 10(Suppl 1):S57–S60. doi: 10.1007/BF01640716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Tait IA, Duthie SJ, Taylor-Robinson D. 1997. Silent upper genital tract chlamydial infection and disease in women. Int J STD AIDS 8:329–331. doi: 10.1258/0956462971920037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Persson K, Osser S. 1993. Lack of evidence of a relationship between genital symptoms, cervicitis and salpingitis and different serovars of Chlamydia trachomatis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 12:195–199. doi: 10.1007/BF01967111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Wyrick PB. 2010. Chlamydia trachomatis persistence in vitro: an overview. J Infect Dis 201(Suppl 2):S88–S95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Hogan R, Mathews SA, Mukhopadhyay S, Summersgill JT, Timms P. 2004. Chlamydial persistence: beyond the biphasic paradigm. Infect Immun 72:1843–1855. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.4.1843-1855.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Bjartling C, Osser S, Persson K. 2000. The frequency of salpingitis and ectopic pregnancy as epidemiologic markers of Chlamydia trachomatis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 79:123–128. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2000.079002123.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Campbell LA, Patton DL, Moore DE, Cappuccio AL, Mueller BA, Wang SP. 1993. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis deoxyribonucleic acid in women with tubal infertility. Fertil Steril 59:45–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Patton DL, Askienazy-Elbhar M, Henry-Suchet J, Campbell LA, Cappuccio A, Tannous W, Wang SP, Kuo CC. 1994. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in fallopian tube tissue in women with postinfectious tubal infertility. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171:95–101. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(94)70084-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Bavoil PM. 2014. What's in a word: the use, misuse, and abuse of the word “persistence” in Chlamydia biology. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 4:27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Stephens RS. 2003. The cellular paradigm of chlamydial pathogenesis. Trends Microbiol 11:44–51. doi: 10.1016/S0966-842X(02)00011-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Geisler WM. 2010. Duration of untreated, uncomplicated Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection and factors associated with chlamydia resolution: a review of human studies. J Infect Dis 201(Suppl 2):S104–S113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Yang X. 2001. Distinct function of Th1 and Th2 type delayed type hypersensitivity: protective and pathological reactions to chlamydial infection. Microsc Res Tech 53:273–277. doi: 10.1002/jemt.1093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Witkin SS, Askienazy-Elbhar M, Henry-Suchet J, Belaisch-Allart J, Tort-Grumbach J, Sarjdine K. 1998. Circulating antibodies to a conserved epitope of the Chlamydia trachomatis 60 kDa heat shock protein (hsp60) in infertile couples and its relationship to antibodies to C. trachomatis surface antigens and the Escherichia coli and human HSP60. Hum Reprod 13:1175–1179. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.5.1175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Spandorfer SD, Neuer A, LaVerda D, Byrne G, Liu HC, Rosenwaks Z, Witkin SS. 1999. Previously undetected Chlamydia trachomatis infection, immunity to heat shock proteins and tubal occlusion in women undergoing in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 14:60–64. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.1.60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Witkin SS, Linhares IM. 2002. Chlamydia trachomatis in subfertile women undergoing uterine instrumentation—an alternative to direct microbial testing or prophylactic antibiotic treatment. Hum Reprod 17:1938–1941. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.8.1938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Hjelholt A, Christiansen G, Johannesson TG, Ingerslev HJ, Birkelund S. 2011. Tubal factor infertility is associated with antibodies against Chlamydia trachomatis heat shock protein 60 but not human HSP60. Hum Reprod 26:2069–2076. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Morrison RP, Lyng K, Caldwell HD. 1989. Chlamydial disease pathogenesis. Ocular hypersensitivity elicited by a genus-specific 57-kD protein. J Exp Med 169:663–675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Rank RG, Dascher C, Bowlin AK, Bavoil PM. 1995. Systemic immunization with Hsp60 alters the development of chlamydial ocular disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 36:1344–1351. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Watkins NG, Hadlow WJ, Moos AB, Caldwell HD. 1986. Ocular delayed hypersensitivity: a pathogenetic mechanism of chlamydial-conjunctivitis in guinea pigs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 83:7480–7484. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.19.7480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Javaloy J, Ferrer C, Vidal MT, Alio JL. 2003. Follicular conjunctivitis caused by Chlamydia trachomatis in an infant Saharan population: molecular and clinical diagnosis. Br J Ophthalmol 87:142–146. doi: 10.1136/bjo.87.2.142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Jakus S, Neuer A, Dieterle S, Bongiovanni AM, Witkin SS. 2008. Antibody to the Chlamydia trachomatis 60 kDa heat shock protein in follicular fluid and in vitro fertilization outcome. Am J Reprod Immunol 59:85–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2007.00539.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Keltz MD, Sauerbrun-Cutler MT, Durante MS, Moshier E, Stein DE, Gonzales E. 2013. Positive Chlamydia trachomatis serology result in women seeking care for infertility is a negative prognosticator for intrauterine pregnancy. Sex Transm Dis 40:842–845. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.de Barbeyrac B, Papaxanthos-Roche A, Mathieu C, Germain C, Brun JL, Gachet M, Mayer G, Bebear C, Chene G, Hocke C. 2006. Chlamydia trachomatis in subfertile couples undergoing an in vitro fertilization program: a prospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 129:46–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Akande V, Turner C, Horner P, Horne A, Pacey A. 2010. Impact of Chlamydia trachomatis in the reproductive setting: British Fertility Society guidelines for practice. Hum Fertil (Camb) 13:115–125. doi: 10.3109/14647273.2010.513893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Ouburg S, Spaargaren J, den Hartog JE, Land JA, Fennema JS, Pleijster J, Pena AS, Morre SA. 2005. The CD14 functional gene polymorphism −260 C>T is not involved in either the susceptibility to Chlamydia trachomatis infection or the development of tubal pathology. BMC Infect Dis 5:114. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-5-114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Mei B, Luo Q, Du K, Huo Z, Wang F, Yu P. 2009. Association of MICA gene polymorphisms with Chlamydia trachomatis infection and related tubal pathology in infertile women. Hum Reprod 24:3090–3095. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]