Skip to main content
Turkish Journal of Urology logoLink to Turkish Journal of Urology
. 2013 Sep;39(3):181–187. doi: 10.5152/tud.2013.037

The role of epigenetics in spermatogenesis

Sezgin Güneş 1,, Tuba Kulaç 1
PMCID: PMC4548616  PMID: 26328105

Abstract

Male germ cells have a unique morphology and function to facilitate fertilization. Sperm deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is highly condensed to protect the paternal genome during transfer from male to oocyte. Sperm cells undergo extensive epigenetic modifications during differentiation to become a mature spermatozoon. Epigenetic modifications, including DNA methylation, histone modifications, and chromatin remodeling are substantial regulators of spermatogenesis. DNA hypermethylation is associated with gene silencing. Meanwhile, hypomethylation is associated with gene expression. In sperm cells, promoters of developmental genes are highly hypomethylated. Proper DNA methylation is essential for embryo development. Histone modifications are chemical modifications that change the DNA-binding capacity of histones and the accessibility of regulatory factors to the DNA, thereby altering gene expression. Phosphorylation, methylation, acetylation, and ubiquitination are primary modifications of lysine and serine residues on histone tails. In addition to somatic histones, testis-specific histone variants are expressed, including histone H2B in mature sperm. The replacement of histones with protamines is a crucial step in spermatogenesis. Histone hyper-acetylation induces a loose chromatin structure and facilitates topoisomerase-induced DNA strand breaks. As a result, histones are replaced with transition proteins. Next, the transition proteins are replaced with protamines that induce compaction of sperm DNA. This review provides an overview of epigenetic changes during spermatogenesis.

Keywords: Chromatin remodeling, DNA methylation, epigenetics, histone modification, spermatogenesis


Epigenetics is defined as stable changes which can be inherited through mitotic or meiotic division, but alter gene expression without modifying DNA sequences.[1] In antique Greek epi-, prefix means over, above, and beyond. Therefore it means over, and beyond genetics.

Epigenetic mechanisms mediate interactions between DNA, and miscellaneous proteins which have regulatory roles in replication, and gene expression processes at various stages of development during the life of an organism, with DNA. Each cell type has a specific epigenetic signature. This signature reflects developmental history, and environmental effects in the phenotype of the cell, and the organism.[2]

Epigenetic changes involve histone proteins which function in the packaging of DNA, and also a series of DNA modifications.DNA encircles histone proteins, and constitutes fundamental structural unit of the chromatin, namely nucleosome. It regulates DNA methylation, and also via modifications of histone, and chromatin it also controls gene expression under varying temporal, and environmental conditions.[3,4] During development epigenetic profile of the germ cells changes.[5,6] During post-implantation embryonic phase, pluripotent cells of epiblasts ensure development of primordial germ cells (PGCs). In women PGCs are suppressed during prophase of meiosis I, in men it enters into the phase of mitotic arrest. Epigenetic profiles of germ cells undergo transformations during different phases of meiotic division.[7]

In this article we will review methylation of sperm DNA, sperm histone, and chromatin modifications occurring during spermatogenesis.

1. Sperm DNA methylation

DNA methylation is a biochemical procedure where a methyl group is added to the 5. carbon of the pyrimidine ring of the cytosine nucleotide located in the CpG islands.[8] CpG islands are 500 bp long-genomic regions which contain very condensed CG dinucleotides (CG/GC >55%).[9] These sequences are found in the promoter regions of nearly 40% of mammalian genes. DNA methylation seen in CpG islads in the promoter region leads to inheritable silencing at the transciption level. DNA methylation seen in CpG islands plays an important role in the regulation of gene expression. In the regulation of gene expression, methylation especially in the promoter regions of genes, induces changes in the recognition regions of transcription factors with resultant prevention of these factors. This process plays a role in the suppression of gene expression.[10]

DNA methylation occurs under the impact of DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) enzyme. One of DNA methyltransferases [one DNMT1, one DNMT2, three DNMT3 (DNMT3a/3b and DNMT3L)] catalyze transfer of one methyl group from S-adenosyl methionine to cytosine.[10] DNMT1 is responsible from maintenance of methylation motif during DNA replication, and termed as maintenance methyltransferase. DNMT3s mediate de novo methylation of unmethylated cytosines, and methylates genomic DNA during early phase of embryonic development. Though the role of DNMT2 has not been fully elucidated, as suggested by researchers, it might exert an impact as a tRNA methyltransferase.[1012]

These acquired changes are perpetual, and permanent.[4,13] Hypo-, and hypermethylation can occur spontaneously in different regions of the genome.[14]

In a recent study, sperm methylation maps of human beings, and chimpanzees have been determined. In this study, it was reported that promoters of the genes responsible from development were hypomethylated, and manifested stronger hypomethylation when compared with promoters of the somatic cells. Besides, recurrent regions of the sperm genome reportedly demonstrate high degrees of methylation, while transposons manifest weaker methylation.[15]

2. Sperm Histone Modification

Histones are basic proteins rich in lysine, and arginine. They are located in the nuclei of eukaryotic cells, and induce packaging of DNA within lysosomes. H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 histone proteins are found in the nuclei of nucleosomes. Nucleosomes contain octameric proteins formed by combination of two H3-H4 dimers, and two H2A-H2B dimers, and they are bound by H1 histone proteins.[16] Via simple chemical modifications, histones change DNA –binding capacities, and interaction of other regulatory factors with DNA, and thus lead to alterations in gene activation. Histone modifications are linked to specific enzymes.[17] Histone modifications are realized by acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, and ubiquitination. Generally, acetylation of histone H3, and H4 leads to open chromatin configuration, and active transcription which facilitates binding of transcription factors.[18] However deacetylation is related to inactivation of transcription, and generally correlates with methylation. Generally, histone acetylation is seen in regions of active transcription, hypoacetylated histones are localized in euchromatic, and heterochromatic regions.[19] Another regulatory mechanism is methylation of lysine found in histone tails. Chemical changes as conversion of lysine in histone tails to serine are realized through methylation, acetylation and ubiquitination.[20,21] H3K9,and H3K27 histones are generally associated with inactivation.[22] However methylation of histones take place both in active, and inactive chromatin sites. Methylation of 9. lysine on amino terminal of histone (H3-9K) leads to DNA silencing, and also involves heterochromatic regions. On the other hand, methylation of the 4. lysine of H3 protein (H3-4K) is associated with activation, and mainly it takes place in promoter regions of active genes. During spermatogenesis, methylation of histone tails is achieved by H3-K4, and H3-K9 methyltransferases.[23]

Modifications between H3 and H4 histone protein tails lead to various interactions. Some of them regulate transitions between active, and inactive chromatin states through a reverse mechanism called histone code.[24]

Premeiotic PGCs, and spermatogonia demonstrate specific histone H3K9me3 modification model.[25,26] However, with the onset of meiotic process in male germ cells these models change (Figure 1).[27] Histone modification, and changes in its composition play important roles in chromatin modifications required for normal meiotic process, and later maturation of gametes.[6] Both female, and male gamete cells undergo developmental changes following termination of meiotic division. Some histones on X chromosome, label, and retain H3K9me2, global remodelling in haploid spermatids occur at a lower rate.[28,29] Variants of H2A, H2B, H3, and H1are expressed in testis. Compared with standard histones, histone variants have a lower degrees of stability.[30] In testis, in addition to testis-specific histone variants, somatic histone variants are also expressed. In mature sperm, the most frequently testis-specific histone H2B is found.[31] Ion channels, and genes involving spermatogenesis are rich in testis-specific histone H2B contrary to genes responsible from development. Testis-specific H1T2- binding histone variant has an important role in the condensation of chromatin during spermatogenesis.[32] As demonstrated in immunohistochemical studies, histone variant H2AZ which is found in some certain cell types condenses in pericentromeric regions of hemochromatins.[33,34] H3K4me3 condenses in genes involving in spermatogenesis, while H3K4me2 is found in regions rich in developmental genes. Hyperacetylation of histone H4 is responsible from replacement of histones with protamines in haploid spermatids.. HI1s1-binding histone variant (histone-1-like protein in spermatids 1) is expressed in elongated spermatids.[35,36] As a consequence, histone packaging is an evolutional, and developmental procedure for spermatogenesis.[33]

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Spermatogenesis, and epigenetic changes during spermatogenesis

These two epigenetic regulatory mechanisms, ie. DNA methylation, and histone modification are closely related to each other in the process of gene expression. Successful regulation, and control of gene expression requires close cooperation, and interaction of both of these mechanisms.[1]

3. Modification of chromatin during spermatogenesis

Fertilization requires realization of many physiological events including movement of sperm cells all along the female reproductive system, their attachment to zona pellucida, and penetration into oocyte.[37] For the accomplishment of all these phases, a regulatory mechanism involving striking modifications which require replacement of 90–95% histones by protamines becomes effective.[38] Protamines are small molecules rich in arginine. They are located in nuclei, and synthetized during advanced stages of spermatogenesis.[39] Protamination of sperm chromatin facilitates compaction of nucleus required for sperm motility, and also protects sperm genome from oxidation, and harmful molecules within the female reproductive system. Extensive packaging of DNA following protamination prevent transcription. Protamination is an epigenetic regulatory process specific to sperm cells.[38] Before fertilization, paternal haploid genome carried by mature sperm is packaged tightly by protamines, maternal genome which is suppressed in metaphase II is packaged by histone proteins. After fertilization, protamines are rapidly translocated with histones, and oocyte passes through metaphase II, and polar body is thrown out. H3, and H4 histones found in paternal chromatin are more effectively acetylated when compared with those contained in maternal chromatin.[40,41]

Translocation mechanism taking place between histone proteins, and protamines which ensures packaging of sperm DNA is still a partially understood multistep process Early modification processes involve replacement of histone variants by selected histones which are expressed during spermatogenesis. In mature sperm mostly testis-specific histone 2B protein variant is found which attracts attention because of its unique expression characteristic. Characteristic in that it does not undergo polyadenilation at its 3 terminal, and it is localized in telomeres of sperm chromosomes.[42] Acetylation of some histones accelerates due to their replacement by their variants.

Acetylation is regulated by acetylase, and deacetylase enzymes. Hyperacetylation of histones leads to loosening of chromatin structure. Loose protein structure stimulates DNA strand breaks caused by topoisomerase enzyme, and facilitates separation of histones, and their replacement by transition proteins (TPs).[43,44] Hyperacetylation triggers chain of events with resultant replacement of histones by protamines.[45] Transition proteins 1, and 2 demonstrate moderately basic non-histone proteins. They involve in 12., and 13. stages of spermatogenesis, but leave the process at 14. stage.[30] These proteins stick to DNA, and thus play critical roles in separation of histone variants, and later condensation by protamine.[46] Then TPs are totally replaced by protamines. Two protamines (P1, and P2) are nearly equally expressed in human beings. TP, and protamine expressed genes are considerably overlap (Figure 2).[47] These also have a unique translational regulatory mechanism.[48] This important posttranslational mechanism involves phosphorylation required for appropriate chromatin condensation.[49] In mice where one of these transition proteins was intentionally mutated (knockout mice), despite DNA-packaging, though inadequate, could be made with the aid of the other transition protein. and protamine with resultant infertile mice.[50] Histones break after their replacement by protamine. Incorporation of protamines into sperm chromatin induces tighter DNA-packaging. Thus during configuration, and transfer of spermatozoa, safe conditions are created for the genome. Oakes et al.[51] reported that the characteristic features of DNA methylation change only a little bit during evolution of genome after pachytene stage of spermatocytes. In fertile men, ratio of P1/P2 protamines equal to one. Erroneous processing of protamine transcripts leads to increase in the production of immature P2 precursors associated with subfertility.[52,53] Subfertility is also associated with derangement of P1/P2 ratio.[38,54] Despite controversial publications, deviations in protamine ratio has been associated with various phenotypic features including decreased sperm counts, and function, and poor embryonic quality.[48,55,56] Besides variations were detected in average P1/P2 ratio in ejaculate at different measurement time points.[57,58] In conclusion, abnormal protamination is seen prevalently in men with abnormal sperm parameters contrary to fertile men with normal sperm parameters.[53,59] In many studies abnormal replacement of histones by protamines have been associated with reduced semen quality, decreased success rates of IVF, and pregnancy rates.[56,58,60,61]

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Replacement of histones localized in sperm chromatin by protamines

Appropriate protamine levels cause firmly packaging of chromatin leading to tighter compaction of sperm nuclei. Mammalian sperm chromatin constitutes of three parts. These components include protamine-bound DNA, histone-bound DNA, and sperm nuclear matrix bound-DNA.[62] Packaging of DNA with protamine is realized via formation of disulfide bonds between protamines, and toroidal structure of the chromatin subunit.[63] In each tororidal subunit nearly 50 kb DNA is packaged.[39] Recently Ward has proposed a specific model of DNA-packaging by protamines. According to this donut loop model, each toroid links, loop domains of DNA and matrix attachment regions.[62,64] This model demonstrates that protamine-bound DNA is protected from damage, by compressing, and packing toroids, while toroid-linker, and histone-bound DNA regions are exposed to DNA damage induced by endonucleases.[65]

On the other hand, nearly 5–10% of DNAs of fertile, and a higher percentage of DNAs in infertile men are bound to histones.[66,67] It has been reported that the presence of somatic cell like-chromatins in the sperm nuclei can induce transmission of divergent genetic information to offsprings. Up to recent times, we were ignorant about the function of histones which translocate with protamines in the sperm nuclei, and mostly inadequate protaminations were thought to be the source of these histones. Two important studies have determined the location of histones which do not replace with protamines, and also retained all along the sperm genome. Arpanahi et al. cut human, and rat sperm chromatin with endonucleases, and determined endonuclease-sensitive regions.[68] They reported that endonuclease-sensitive regions are mainly bound to histones, and harbour regulatory genomic regions which also contain promoters. Hammoud et al.[66] used a different method. They used micrococcal nuclease digestion, and gel purification procedures to differentiate chromatin-bound histone from protamine-bound histone. This protein purification is followed by microarray analysis, and sequencing procedure so as to identify histone-bound DNA, and protein-bound DNA. In this study, sperms of fertile, and normospermic men were used. It has been shown that histones concentrate in the promoters of required genes to ensure their development, and this process is not interrupted in miRNA, and genes undergoing imprinting. This study demonstrates that protamines do not concentrate in any gene family. In conclusion, these two studies demonstrate that the retained histones might have a potential epigenetic role in the embryonic development. As reported by Hammoud et al. epigenetic role of the variants of retained histones might be directed to a certain goal. Indeed, their more recent studies have demonstrated that both genes responsible for the development of embryonic stem cells, and H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 in critical genes responsible for the development were bivalently marked. These bivalently marked DNA regions are also methylated. They are also situated between regions which ensure creation of balanced state for genome.[66,69] Recent studies indicate that histones have an important role in the determination of the epigenetic position of the sperm. They do not distribute in the genome randomly, and specific histone modifications regulate activation, and silencing of the genome.[6971] These data have shown that sperm chromatin can transfer inheritable epigenetic characteristics which might exert an effect on post-fertilization transcriptional regulation.[72]

Despite numerous studies performed on male infertility within last years, still substantial number of cases of infertility remain unexplained. Various studies have demonstrated critical roles of epigenetic factors in spermatogenesis. Thorough understanding of these factors, and their mechanisms of action may contribute to the determination of the causes of male infertility, and also ways of controlling these mechanisms.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Mert Nahir for drawing of figure.

Footnotes

Author Contributions: Concept - S.G., T.K.; Design - S.G., T.K.; Supervision - S.G.; Funding - S.G.; Materials - S.G., T.K.; Data Collection and/or Processing - S.G., T.K.; Analysis and/or Interpretation - S.G., T.K.; Literature Review - S.G., T.K.; Writer - S.G., T.K.; Critical Review - S.G.

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.

References

  • 1.Carrell DT. Epigenetics of the male gamete. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:267–74. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.12.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Angers B, Castonguay E, Massicotte R. Environmentally induced phenotypes and DNA methylation: how to deal with unpredictable conditions until the next generation and after. Mol Ecol. 2010;19:1283–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04580.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Li E. Chromatin modification and epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Nat Rev Genet. 2002;3:662–73. doi: 10.1038/nrg887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Richardson BC. Role of DNA methylation in the regulation of cell function autoimmunity, aging and cancer. J Nutr. 2002;132:2401–5. doi: 10.1093/jn/132.8.2401S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Surani MA, Hayashi K, Hajkova P. Genetic and epigenetic regulators of pluripotency. Cell. 2007;128:747–62. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kimmins S, Sassone-Corsi P. Chromatin remodelling and epigenetic features of germ cells. Nature. 2005;434:583–9. doi: 10.1038/nature03368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dada R, Kumar M, Jesudasan R, Fernández JL, Gosálvez J, Agarwal A. Epigenetics and its role in male infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29:213–23. doi: 10.1007/s10815-012-9715-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Talbert PB, Henikoff S. Spreading of silent chromatin: inaction at a distance. Nat Rev Genet. 2006;7:793–803. doi: 10.1038/nrg1920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Takai D, Jones PA. Comprehensive analysis of CpG islands in human chromosomes 21 and 22. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:3740–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.052410099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yi SV, Goodisman MA. Computational approaches for understanding the evolution of DNA methylation in animals. Epigenetics. 2009;4:551–6. doi: 10.4161/epi.4.8.10345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Okano M, Xie S, Li E. Cloning and characterization of a family of novel mammalian DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferases. Nat Genet. 1998;19:219–20. doi: 10.1038/890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gabor Miklos GL, Maleszka R. Epigenomic communication systems in humans and honey bees: from molecules to behavior. Horm Behav. 2011;59:399–406. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wilson VL, Jones PA. DNA methylation decreases in aging but not in immortal cells. Science. 1983;220:1055–7. doi: 10.1126/science.6844925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Issa JP. CpG-island methylation in aging and cancer. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2000;249:101–18. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-59696-4_7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Molaro A, Hodges E, Fang F, Song Q, McCombie WR, Hannon GJ, et al. Sperm methylation profiles reveal features of epigenetic inheritance and evolution in primates. Cell. 2011;146:1029–41. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Campos EI, Reinberg D. Histones: annotating chromatin. Annu Rev Genet. 2009;43:559–99. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.032608.103928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cairns BR. The logic of chromatin architecture and remodelling at promoters. Nature. 2009;461:193–8. doi: 10.1038/nature08450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Liu Y, Lu C, Yang Y, Fan Y, Yang R, Liu CF, et al. Influence of histone tails and H4 tail acetylations on nucleosome-nucleosome interactions. J Mol Biol. 2011;14:749–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.10.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Peng L, Seto E. Deacetylation of nonhistone proteins by HDACs and the implications in cancer. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2011;206:39–56. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-21631-2_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kouzarides T. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell. 2007;128:693–705. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Handy DE, Castro R, Loscalzo J. Epigenetic modifications: basic mechanisms and role in cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2011;123:2145–56. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.956839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Werner M, Ruthenburg AJ. The united states of histone ubiquitylation and methylation. Mol Cell. 2011;43:5–7. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Carrell DT, Emery BR, Hammoud S. The aetiology of sperm protamine abnormalities and their potential impact on the sperm epigenome. Int J Androl. 2008;31:537–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2008.00872.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lachner M, O’Sullivan RJ, Jenuwein T. An epigenetic road map for histone lysine methylation. Cell Sci. 2003;116:2117–24. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.McLaren A. Primordial germ cells in the mouse. Dev Biol. 2003;262:1–15. doi: 10.1016/s0012-1606(03)00214-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Payne C, Braun RE. Histone lysine trimethylation exhibits a distinct perinuclear distribution in Plzf-expressing spermatogonia. Dev Biol. 2006;293:461–72. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Peters AH, O’Carroll D, Scherthan H, Mechtler K, Sauer S, Schofer C, et al. Loss of the Suv39h histone methyltransferases impairs mammalian heterochromatin and genome stability. Cell. 2001;107:323–37. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00542-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Namekawa SH, Park PJ, Zhang LF, Shima JE, McCarrey JR, Griswold MD, et al. Postmeiotic sex chromatin in the male germline of mice. Curr Biol. 2006;16:660–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.01.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Turner JM, Mahadevaiah SK, Ellis PJ, Mitchell MJ, Burgoyne PS. Pachytene asynapsis drives meiotic sex chromosome inactivation and leads to substantial postmeiotic repression in spermatids. Dev Cell. 2006;10:521–9. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gaucher J, Reynoird N, Montellier E, Boussouar F, Rousseaux S, Khochbin S. From meiosis to postmeiotic events: the secrets of histone disappearance. FEBS J. 2010;277:599–604. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07504.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.van Roijen HJ, Ooms MP, Spaargaren MC, Baarends WM, Weber RF, Grootegoed JA, et al. Immunoexpression of testis-specific histone 2b in human spermatozoa and testis tissue. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:1559–66. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.6.1559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Martianov I, Brancorsini S, Catena R, Gansmuller A, Kotaja N, Parvinen M, et al. Polar nuclear localization of H1T2, a histone H1 variant, required for spermatid elongation and DNA condensation during spermiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:2808–13. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0406060102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Carrell DT, Hammoud SS. The human sperm epigenome and its potential role in embryonic development. Mol Hum Reprod. 2010;16:37–47. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gap090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rangasamy D, Berven L, Ridgway P, Tremethick DJ. Pericentric heterochromatin becomes enriched with H2a.Z during early mammalian development. EMBO J. 2003;22:1599–607. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Meistrich ML, Trostle-Weige PK, Lin R, Bhatnagar YM, Allis CD. Highly acetylated H4 is associated with histone displacement in rat spermatids. Mol Reprod Dev. 1992;31:170–81. doi: 10.1002/mrd.1080310303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sonnack V, Failing K, Bergmann M, Steger K. Expression of hyperacetylated histone H4 during normal and impaired human spermatogenesis. Andrologia. 2002;34:384–90. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0272.2002.00524.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Yamauchi Y, Shaman JA, Ward WS. Non-genetic contributions of the sperm nucleus to embryonic development. Asian J Androl. 2011;13:31–5. doi: 10.1038/aja.2010.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Oliva R. Protamines and male infertility. Hum Reprod Update. 2006;12:417–35. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dml009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Balhorn R. A model for the structure of chromatin in mammalian sperm. J Cell Biol. 1982;93:298–305. doi: 10.1083/jcb.93.2.298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Santos F, Hendrich B, Reik W, Dean W. Dynamic reprogramming of DNA methylation in the early mouse embryo. Dev Biol. 2002;241:172–82. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2001.0501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Adenot PG, Mercier Y, Renard JP, Thompson EM. Differential H4 acetylation of paternal and maternal chromatin precedes DNA replication and differential transcriptional activity in pronuclei of 1-cell mouse embryos. Development. 1997;124:4615–25. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.22.4615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Churikov D, Siino J, Svetlova M, Zhang K, Gineitis A, Morton Bradbury E, et al. Novel human testis-specific histone H2B encoded by the interrupted gene on the X chromosome. Genomics. 2004;84:745–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2004.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Rousseaux S, Boussouar F, Gaucher J, Reynoird N, Montellier E, Curtet S, et al. Molecular models for post-meiotic male genome reprogramming. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2011;57:50–3. doi: 10.3109/19396368.2010.498076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Song N, Liu J, An S, Nishino T, Hishikawa Y, Koji T. Immunohistochemical analysis of histone H3 modifications in germ cells during mouse spermatogenesis. Acta Histochem Cytochem. 2011;44:183–90. doi: 10.1267/ahc.11027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rousseaux S, Gaucher J, Thevenon J, Caron C, Vitte AL, Curtet S, et al. Spermiogenesis: histone acetylation triggers male genome reprogramming. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2009;37:519–22. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2009.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Meistrich ML, Mohapatra B, Shirley CR, Zhao M. Roles of transition nuclear proteins in spermiogenesis. Chromosoma. 2003;111:483–8. doi: 10.1007/s00412-002-0227-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Corzett M, Mazrimas J, Balhorn R. Protamine 1: protamine 2 stoichiometry in the sperm of eutherian mammals. Mol Reprod Dev. 2002;61:519–27. doi: 10.1002/mrd.10105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Carrell DT, Emery BR, Hammoud S. Altered protamine expression and diminished spermatogenesis: what is the link? Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13:313–27. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dml057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Aoki VW, Carrell DT. Human protamines and the developing spermatid: their structure, function, expression and relationship with male infertility. Asian J Androl. 2003;5:315–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Shirley CR, Hayashi S, Mounsey S, Yanagimachi R, Meistrich ML. Abnormalities and reduced reproductive potential of sperm from Tnp1- and Tnp2-null double mutant mice. Biol Reprod. 2004;71:1220–9. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.104.029363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Oakes CC, La Salle S, Smiraglia DJ, Robaire B, Trasler JM. A unique configuration of genome-wide DNA methylation patterns in the testis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:228–33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0607521104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.de Mateo S, Ramos L, de Boer P, Meistrich M, Oliva R. Protamine 2 precursors and processing. Protein Pept Lett. 2011;18:778–85. doi: 10.2174/092986611795713998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Carrell DT, Liu L. Altered protamine 2 expression is uncommon in donors of known fertility, but common among men with poor fertilizing capacity, andmay reflect other abnormalities of spermiogenesis. J Androl. 2001;22:604–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Aoki VW, Liu L, Jones KP, Hatasaka HH, Gibson M, Peterson CM, et al. Sperm protamine 1/protamine 2 ratios are related to in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates and predictive of fertilization ability. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:1408–15. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.04.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Torregrosa N, Dominguez-Fandos D, Camejo MI, Shirley CR, Meistrich ML, Ballesca JL, et al. Protamine 2 precursors, protamine 1/protamine 2 ratio, DNA integrity and other sperm parameters in infertile patients. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:2084–9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Simon L, Castillo J, Oliva R, Lewis SE. Relationships between human sperm protamines, DNA damage and assisted reproduction outcomes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;23:724–34. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Huser T, Orme CA, Hollars CW, Corzett MH, Balhorn R. Raman Spectroscopy of DNA packaging in individual human sperm cells distinguishes normal from abnormal cells. J Biophotonics. 2009;2:322–32. doi: 10.1002/jbio.200910012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Aoki VW, Emery BR, Liu L, Carrell DT. Protamine levels vary between individual sperm cells of infertile human males and correlate with viability and DNA integrity. J Androl. 2006;27:890–8. doi: 10.2164/jandrol.106.000703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Nanassy L, Liu L, Griffin J, Carrell DT. The clinical utility of the protamine 1/protamine 2 ratio in sperm. Protein Pept Lett. 2011;18:772–7. doi: 10.2174/092986611795713934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Soteriadou KP, Remoundos MS, Katsikas MC, Tzinia AK, Tsikaris V, Sakarellos C, et al. The Ser-Arg-Tyr-Asp region of the major surface glycoprotein of Leishmania mimics the Arg-Gly-Asp-Ser cell attachment region of fibronectin. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:13980–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Haidl G, Schill WB. Assessment of sperm chromatin condensation: an important test for prediction of IVF outcome. Arch Androl. 1994;32:263–6. doi: 10.3109/01485019408987794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Ward WS. Function of sperm chromatin structural elements in fertilization and development. Mol Hum Reprod. 2010;16:30–6. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gap080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Cree LH, Balhorn R, Brewer LR. Single molecule studies of DNA-protamine interactions. Protein Pept Lett. 2011;18:802–10. doi: 10.2174/092986611795713943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Yanagimachi R. Male gamete contributions to the embryo. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005;1061:203–7. doi: 10.1196/annals.1336.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Dominguez K, Arca CDR, Ward WS. The relationship between chromatin structure and DNA damage in mammalian spermatozoa. In: Zini A, Agarwal A, editors. Sperm chromatin: biological and clinical applications in male infertility and assisted reprod. 2011. pp. 61–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Hammoud SS, Nix DA, Zhang H, Purwar J, Carrell DT, Cairns BR. Distinctive chromatin in human sperm packages genes for embryo development. Nature. 2009;460:473–8. doi: 10.1038/nature08162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Hammoud SS, Nix DA, Hammoud AO, Gibson M, Cairns BR, Carrell DT. Genome-wide analysis identifies changes in histone retention and epigenetic modifications at developmental and imprinted gene loci in the sperm of infertile men. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:2558–69. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Arpanahi A, Brinkworth M, Iles D, Krawetz SA, Paradowska A, Platts AE, et al. Endonuclease-sensitive regions of human spermatozoal chromatin are highly enriched in promoter and CTCF binding sequences. Genome Res. 2009;19:1338–49. doi: 10.1101/gr.094953.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Gan Q, Yoshida T, McDonald OG, Owens GK. Concise review: epigenetic mechanisms contribute to pluripotency and cell lineage determination of embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells. 2007;25:2–9. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Hammoud S, Liu L, Carrell DT. Protamine ratio and the level of histone retention in sperm selected from a density gradient preparation. Andrologia. 2009;41:88–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.2008.00890.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Li Y, Lalancette C, Miller D, Krawetz SA. Characterization of nucleohistone and nucleoprotamine components in the mature human sperm nucleus. Asian J Androl. 2008;10:535–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7262.2008.00410.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Miller D, Brinkworth M, Iles D. Paternal DNA packaging in spermatozoa: more than the sum of its parts? DNA, histones, protamines and epigenetics. Reproduction. 2010;139:287–301. doi: 10.1530/REP-09-0281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Turkish journal of urology are provided here courtesy of Turkish Association of Urology

RESOURCES