Skip to main content
Toxins logoLink to Toxins
. 2015 Aug 20;7(8):3309–3329. doi: 10.3390/toxins7083309

Presence of Multiple Mycotoxins and Other Fungal Metabolites in Native Grasses from a Wetland Ecosystem in Argentina Intended for Grazing Cattle

María J Nichea 1, Sofia A Palacios 1, Stella M Chiacchiera 2, Michael Sulyok 3, Rudolf Krska 3, Sofia N Chulze 1, Adriana M Torres 1, María L Ramirez 1,*
Editor: Paola Battilani
PMCID: PMC4549752  PMID: 26308052

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of several fungal metabolites, including mycotoxins in natural grasses (Poaceae) intended for grazing cattle. A total number of 72 and 77 different metabolites were detected on 106 and 69 grass samples collected during 2011 and 2014, respectively. A total of 60 metabolites were found across both years. Among the few mycotoxins considered toxic for ruminants, no samples of natural grasses were contaminated with aflatoxins, ochratoxin A, ergot alkaloids, and gliotoxin, among others. However, we were able to detect important metabolites (toxic to ruminants) such as type A trichothecenes, mainly T-2 toxin and HT-2 toxin (up to 5000 µg/kg each), and zearalenone (up to 2000 µg/kg), all at very high frequencies and levels. Other fungal metabolites that were found to be prevalent were other Fusarium metabolites like beauvericin, equisetin and aurofusarin, metabolites produced by Alternaria spp., sterigmatocystin and its precursors and anthrachinone derivatives. It is important to point out that the profile of common metabolites was shared during both years of sampling, and also that the occurrence of important metabolites is not a sporadic event. Considering that this area of temperate grassland is used for grazing cattle all year long due to the richness in palatable grasses (Poaceae), the present work represents a starting point for further studies on the occurrence of multi-mycotoxins in natural grasses in order to have a complete picture of the extent of cattle exposure. Also, the present study shows that the presence of zeranol in urine of beef cattle may not be a consequence of illegal use of this banned substance, but the product of the natural occurrence of zearalenone and α-zearalenol in natural grasses intended for cattle feeding.

Keywords: Poaceae, grasses, mycotoxins, Fusarium, cattle feed, bacterial and fungal metabolites

1. Introduction

Extensive beef production is a distinctive feature of Argentina. Beef production is generally based on grazing native grasses and cultivated pastures [1]. Nearly all the cattle are raised through grazing, with only 1.2% finished in corrals. Grazing throughout the year produces leaner beef cuts with less cholesterol and greater polyunsaturated fatty acids than beef finished on a high grain diet in feedlot [2]. Conventional cattle grazing in Argentina provides a desirable product for internal and external markets [3]. The prospects for Argentinean beef exports are promising, mainly due to the country’s recent advancements in sanitary status. Argentina has been declared free of foot and mouth disease with vaccination, and also has been assigned the best possible status for a low Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) risk. These achievements, together with the fertile soil and climate characteristics for beef production, are driving forces for the increase in the country’s beef exports [1].

Mycotoxins are naturally occurring compounds or secondary metabolites produced by fungi growing on plants in the field or during storage. Mycotoxins can contaminate raw agricultural products before and/or after harvest. Numerous mycotoxins can be produced by fungi invading plant material; however, only few mycotoxins have been recognized as toxic to ruminants. Mycotoxins relevant for ruminant’s health are aflatoxins, ochratoxin A, zearalenone, fumonisins (B1 and B2), trichothecenes, ergot alkaloids, and gliotoxin among others [4].

The negative effect of mycotoxins on the growth and health of livestock makes them a major problem for many production systems. Mycotoxicosis symptoms depend on the type of mycotoxin, the amount and duration of the exposure, the age, health and sex of the exposed individual, as well as on the dietary status and interactions among toxins. Low levels of mycotoxins may cause reduction decrease in food intake and performance, such as lowered milk production or decrease in body weight gain. Moderate levels of feed contamination frequently result in impaired resistance to infections, increased susceptibility to stress and reduced fertility. High levels of contamination may produce clinical disease, liver and kidney damage, oedema, increased blood clotting time and haemorrhaging, as well as altered digestion, absorption and metabolism of nutrients. Ruminants are less sensitive to the negative mycotoxin effects since rumen microbiota can effectively degrade and deactivate mycotoxins, hence protecting the animal [5,6].

Beef animals in Argentina are finished either solely on natural grasses or pastures, on pastures with supplemented feeding (in most cases corn or sorghum silage) or in feedlots [7]. In Argentina, several reports showed mycotoxin contamination in cattle feed ingredients such as corn grains, mixed rations (corn, protein concentrate, etc.), corn silage, soybean pellet, wheat bran, etc. all used in feedlot rearing practice [8]. However, there is little information on the natural occurrence of mycotoxins in natural grasses (uncultivated) devoted to cattle grazing.

Of particular concern to the Argentinean livestock industry is that zearalenone is chemically similar to the growth promoting α-zearalanol (zeranol), which is banned in Argentina as well as in the EU. In the last five years, zeranol has been detected in bovine urine during the routine analysis of beef cattle farms (enrolled as EU exporter) as part of a national residue control plan by the central governing authority, the National Service for Health and Food Quality (SENASA). It is important to remark that on those cattle farms, the cattle were raised through grazing of natural grasses, without any external inputs. The present research was primarily undertaken to ascertain if zearalenone was present in natural grasses on two beef cattle farms, in which a positive urine sample for zeranol from cattle had been previously found. It is well known that zeranol can be formed from α-zearalenol and zearalenone in vivo in cattle [9]. Several reports from New Zealand and Northern Ireland have shown that zeranol might occur naturally in urine and bile from sheep and cattle, following metabolism of the mycotoxins zearalenone and α-zearalenol that can contaminate animal feedstuffs [9,10]. Thus, the finding of zeranol in an animal might, on its own, be insufficient proof that malicious abuse of zeranol has occurred. As natural grasses (Poaceae) were the unique feed source for the cattle raising in the aforementioned cattle farming, we wanted to probe for the first time in Argentina that natural grasses were contaminated with zearalenone and that it was the possible source of zeranol. The two farms in this study were located at a Ramsar Wetland site (27°20'S 58°50'W, Ramsar site No. 1366) in Chaco province, Argentina [11]. This wetland ecosystem is one of the three most biodiverse biomes of Argentina and it covers part of the Parana and Paraguay rivers floodplain complex at the eastern border of Chaco Province. The landscape consists of complex open water, aquatic vegetation, grasslands and gallery forests. This temperate grassland is used for grazing cattle all year long due to the richness of palatable grasses (Poaceae).

Based on what has been mentioned above, the aims of this study were to evaluate the occurrence of several fungal metabolites including mycotoxins in natural grasses intended for cattle grazing and to determine the co-occurrence of toxins that may be relevant to impairing cattle growth and health.

2. Results

2.1. Performance of the Applied Analytical Method

The performance characteristics of the analytical method obtained from five spiked blank samples are presented in Table 1 (only those analytes that have later been detected in the survey are shown). The limits of detection (LOD) ranged between 0.03 (averufin and festuclavine) and 20 µg/kg (kojic acid). Spiking experiments using five individual samples at two concentration levels revealed that the apparent recoveries are in general lower than those obtained with other (grain-based) matrices [12,13].

Table 1.

Performance characteristics of the analytical method for all analytes detected in the investigated grass samples.

Analyte Apparent Recovery (%) LOD a (µg/kg)
3-Nitropropionic acid 63.3 ± 9.5 0.40
Agroclavine 59.5 ± 5.1 0.08
Altenuene 157.8 ± 40.0 2.00
Alternariol 100.0 ± 9.5 0.50
Alternariol methyl ether 96.6 ± 8.8 0.05
Altertoxin-I 77.9 ± 6.5 0.80
Aspinolid B 75.5 ± 13.2 0.80
Asterric acid 140.0 ± 9.6 3.00
Aurofusarin 75.3 ± 4.7 4.00
Averantin 76.5 ± 0.9 0.04
Averufanin b n.d. d -
Averufin 54.50 ± 2.50 0.03
Beauvericin 41.8 ± 6.0 0.04
Brefeldin A 66.5 ± 6.2 2.00
Brevianamid F 76.2 ± 2.1 0.40
Chanoclavin 73.5 ± 31.2 0.05
Chrysophanol 114.8 ± 11.8 1.50
Clonostachydiol 80.0 ± 21.0 0.80
Curvularin 127.6 ± 15.8 0.40
Cytochalasin B 66.8 ± 7.1 1.50
Cytochalasin C 66.8 ± 6.1 0.40
Cytochalasin D 62.5 ± 4.1 0.20
Cytochalasin H 57.2 ± 5.6 15.00
Cytochalasin J 59.2 ± 7.9 2.00
Dechlorogriseofulvin 73.7 ± 9.1 1.50
Diacetoxyscirpenol 61.0 ± 9.8 0.25
Dihydrogriseofulvin 69.7 ± 8.8 1.00
Emodin 131.3 ± 28.2 0.08
Enniatin B 77.7 ± 42.9 0.01
Equisetin 215.0 ± 38.7 0.08
Festuclavine 73.1 ± 17.3 0.03
Fumonisin B1 59.8 ± 8.1 3.00
Griseofulvin 69.7 ± 4.8 0.80
HT-2 toxin 68.3 ± 1.0 4.00
Kojic acid 83.4 ± 12.2 20.00
Macrosporin 125.8 ± 5.2 0.20
Moniliformin 113.7 ± 6.7 1.00
Monocerin 73.8 ± 3.0 0.40
Neosolaniol 79.2 ± 3.5 0.50
Nidurufin b n.d. -
Nivalenol 41.3 ± 12.0 0.80
Norsolorinic acid 47.0 ± 15.1 0.40
Penicillide 110.9 ± 16.3 1.50
Physcion 114.3 ± 16.6 8.00
Pseurotin A 73.7 ± 48.7 0.50
Radicicol 117.0 ± 12.0 0.40
Secalonic acid D 79.1 ± 8.6 4.00
Skyrin 76.1 ± 4.6 0.20
Sterigmatocystin 69.6 ± 4.0 0.30
Sulochrin 89.7 ± 14.9 1.50
T-2 toxin 64.1 ± 3.6 0.80
Tentoxin 56.2 ± 11.9 0.20
Tenuazonic acid 407.4 ± 108.9 3.00
Tryptophol 79.7 ± 6.4 15.0
Versicolorin A 103.7 ± 3.6 0.40
Versicolorin C c n.d. -
Zearalenone 124.6 ± 10.9 0.30
Zearalenone-4-sulfate 143.1 ± 16.1 0.40
α-zearalenol 120.6 ± 17.2 0.80
β-zearalenol 109.3 ± 15.6 0.80

a LOD, limit of detection; b No standard available, estimation of concentration based on response and recovery of averufin; c No standard available, estimation of concentration based on response and recovery of versicolorin A; d n.d.: not determined.

2.2. Occurrence of Fungal Metabolites in Natural Grass Samples

A total number of 72 and 77 different metabolites were detected on grass samples collected during 2011 and 2014 years, respectively. A total of 60 metabolites were shared on both years evaluated. Data on shared mycotoxin prevalence between both sampling years as well as related median and maximum concentration in the positive samples are compiled in Table 2. The list of the most prevalent metabolites was similar between both years; despite this, there was a lower prevalence/or lower concentration in the grass samples from 2014. It was noticeable that, all the non-shared metabolites found in a particular year were detected in very few samples, these being unimportant metabolites in terms of toxicity for ruminants (Data not shown). The only exception was the presence of deoxynivalenol in grass samples collected during 2011. As an example, Figure 1 shows contamination levels of 16 Fusarium mycotoxins detected in both years of sampling (except deoxynivalenol), and significant differences (p < 0.05) were found in the levels between both years in deoxynivelenol, beauvericin, enniantin B and equisetin, which appeared to be lower during 2014 in comparison with those collected during 2011.

Table 2.

Occurrence and concentrations of the positive identified analytes in natural grass samples during 2011 and 2014.

Analyte N° of Positives Concentration of Positive Samples from 2011 (µg/kg d.m.) N° of Positives Concentration in Positive Samples from 2014 (µg/kg d.m.)
Median 75 Percentile 90 Percentile Max Median 75 Percentile 90 Percentile Max
T-2 toxin 67/106 37.8 218 1375 5438 39/69 47.2 243 559 1095
HT-2 toxin 52/106 110 474 1149 5651 29/60 66.5 117 205 783
Diacetoxyscirpenol 2/106 13.6 21.5 21.5 21.5 2/69 6.49 10.5 10.5 10.5
Neosolaniol 36/106 10.4 39.0 94.5 187 11/69 19.4 38.1 39.6 39.9
Nivalenol 15/106 21.0 44.3 63.6 66.9 2/69 422 832 832 831
Zearalenone 95/106 7.20 50.3 203 2120 56/69 2.50 10.0 80.2 712
Zearalenone-4-sulfate 67/106 3.10 13.0 99.4 303 17/69 6.81 35.7 87.4 111
α-zearalenol 53/106 10.7 39.4 181 464 12/69 9.37 45.1 154 360
β-zearalenol 28/106 10.9 34.9 53.9 245 7/69 8.35 24.2 47.5 52.8
Fumonisin B1 11/106 57.2 97.0 442 566 2/69 64.0 98.7 98.7 98.7
Moniliformin 12/106 13.5 56.2 152 313 3/69 4.38 5.3 5.64 5.64
Beauvericin 106/106 13.5 33.2 95.1 624 43/69 2.23 9.1 18.5 63.4
Enniatin B 74/106 0.09 0.17 0.47 43.2 4/69 0.05 0.10 0.14 0.14
Aurofusarin 96/106 71.4 231 508 13238 25/69 80.7 195 365 409
Equisetin 106/106 118 624 2841 17264 63/69 2.21 12.8 54.8 297
Sterigmatocystin 96/106 4.15 16.5 42.6 733 41/69 6.78 15.1 53.8 147
Averantin 85/106 1.60 5.07 19.4 499 65/69 1.16 2.60 25.3 319
Averufanin 51/106 0.70 1.55 4.44 17.5 21/69 0.20 0.54 3.73 4.65
Averufin 67/106 3.80 8.57 20.4 173 67/69 2.78 8.00 49.3 401
Versicolorin A 20/106 0.65 1.35 27.4 46.5 38/69 3.08 11.9 103 719
Versicolorin C 33/106 1.50 2.42 4.22 25.3 47/69 3.36 10.1 43.9 209
Nidurufin 41/106 0.60 41.2 91.1 228 30/69 0.87 3.58 10.1 28.3
Norsolorinic acid 59/106 3.60 23.4 93.6 257 44/69 3.55 6.76 23.7 63.1
Kojic acid 39/106 206 329 404 522 66/69 103 127 139 187
3-nitropropionic acid 32/106 2.70 5.70 9.94 28.8 37/69 3.77 1.91 28.0 102
Aspinolid B 40/106 39.2 82.6 186 602 27/69 10.0 25.0 43.7 423
Asterric acid 44/106 33.6 58.8 141 346 26/69 22.9 58.3 140.2 223
Sulochrin 42/106 23.7 62.6 90.1 198 30/69 18.3 52.7 283 172
Pseurotin A 31/106 4.70 8.37 13.4 15.2 10/69 7.88 23.4 148 29.5
Agroclavine 2/106 11.2 14.0 14.0 14.0 1/69
Chanoclavin 69/106 2.60 49.1 180.6 2259 31/69 2.44 45.1 439 815
Festuclavine 5/106 32.1 93.6 98.4 98.4 5/69 7.63 75.6 215 215
Secalonic acid 28/106 72.9 116 229 1431 7/69 36.5 202 230 236
Griseofulvin 30/106 18.9 150 594 5880 4/69 23.4 75.0 123 123
Dechlorogriseofulvin 18/106 16.2 124 270 3904 2/69 20.0 32.5 32.5 32.5
Dihydrogriseofulvin 20/106 17.4 119 333 5720 3/69 14.2 55.6 69.4 69.4
Curvularin 73/106 9.30 39.7 358 5362 14/69 5.10 8.62 121 934
Brefeldin A 2/106 1648 2988 2988 2988 2/69 745 874 874 875
Penicillide 7/106 5.70 10.1 14.1 14.9 1/69 15.4
Tenuazonic acid 28/106 31.4 59.4 141 222 27/69 2.43 4.67 11.3 178
Alternariol 105/106 65.3 160. 349 1036 61/69 17.4 58.0 136 1021
Alternariol methyl ether 67/106 12.6 33.3 69.2 377 67/69 10.5 20.2 39.2 160
Tentoxin 90/106 1.60 4.30 12.8 324 21/69 3.76 21.3 136 252
Altenuene 23/106 10.3 15.5 19.8 28.4 2/69 14.3 18.7 18.7 18.7
Altertoxin-I 75/106 5.00 9.40 15.6 383 5/69 1.43 1.86 2.72 2.72
Macrosporin 60/106 2.85 8.90 21.8 50.4 17/69 1.95 4.53 19.2 76.2
Clonostachydiol 13/106 11.5 21.4 53.0 121 3/69 9.97 71.9 92.6 92.6
Cytochalasin B 10/106 90.0 136 925 1616 6/69 32.6 42.6 91.6 97.0
Cytochalasin C 14/106 27.9 64.6 264 412 3/69 33.6 38.1 39.5 39.5
Cytochalasin D 10/106 24.6 67.2 87.6 106 6/69 9.28 10.3 24.1 25.6
Cytochalasin H 9/106 368 1152 1802 2003 4/69 163 638 1064 1064
Cytochalasin J 20/106 40.8 133 215 434 4/69 122 436 677 677
Monocerin 106/106 66.7 215 1916 6745 65/69 20.7 46.9 642 7289
Brevianamid F 33/106 8.00 11.2 17.1 34.3 18/69 32.3 36.1 49.0 62.5
Tryptophol 75/106 73.1 113 217 466 67/69 67.3 226.8 1070 2513
Emodin 106/106 177 471 1551 3725 67/69 62.1 95.4 282 5401
Chrysophanol 104/106 41.1 77.8 142 15952 63/69 15.5 24.8 47.6 120
Physcion 74/106 69.9 166 391 17752 7/69 31.7 35.4 45.9 48.4
Skyrin 105/106 5.90 14.2 38.3 241 55/69 1.93 2.67 5.42 13.7
Radicicol 50/106 33.2 95.0 182 380 20/69 17.5 56.5 75.0 210

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Box-plot for Fusarium mycotoxin concentration in grass samples during both years of study. (* for a particular toxin denotes significant differences between both years evaluated according to Tukey Test (p < 0.001)).

In respect to Fusarium mycotoxins present in natural grass samples during both years evaluated, it was observed that during 2011, beauvericin and equisetin were present in all the samples and monocerin, zearalenone and aurofusariun were present in ≥90% of the samples. Other Fusarium mycotoxins detected at a prevalence of 40%–70% were HT-2 toxin, α-zearalenol, zearalenone-4 sulfate, T-2 toxin and enniantin B. Neosolaniol, β-zearalenol, nivalenol, moniliformin and fumonisin B1 were detected at frequencies of 36%, 28%, 15%, 12% and 11%, respectively. Deoxynivalenol, enniantin A and A1, culmorin and diacetoxyscirpenol were found in low abundance ≤10%.

During 2014, monocerin and equisetin were also present in ≥90% whereas zearalenone was present in 81% of the samples analyzed. Other Fusarium mycotoxins detected at a prevalence of 40%–70% were T-2 toxin, HT-2 toxin and beauvericin. Aurofusarin, zearalenone-4 sulfate, α-zearalenol and neosolaniol were detected at frequencies of 36%, 25%, 17% and 16%, respectively. β-zearalenol, enniantin B, moniliformin, diacetoxyscirpenol, nivalenol and fumonisin B1 were found in low abundance ≤10%.

In particular, out of 106 natural grass samples collected during 2011, 95 were contaminated with zearalenone in concentrations ranging from 0.7–2120 µg/kg d.m. (mean = 84.5 µg/kg). Also, 52 grass samples were co-contaminated with zearalenone and α-zearalenol, both precursors of zeranol, while 22 samples showed co-occurrence of zearalenone, α-zearalenol and β-zearalenol. In the 2014 grass samples, 56 out of 69 samples contaminated with zearalenone in concentrations ranging from 0.3–711.80 µg/kg d.m. (mean = 41.40 µg/kg d.m.) were found. Also, seven grass samples were co-contaminated with zearalenone and α-zearalenol, both precursors of zeranol, and seven samples showed co-occurrence of zearalenone, α-zearalenol and β-zearalenol.

Alternariol was the most frequent (99%) Alternaria mycotoxin found on natural grasses during 2011. Tentoxin, altertoxin-1, alternariol monomethyl ether and macrosporin were detected in frequencies ranging from 85% to 57%. Tenuazonic acid was detected in 26% of the samples analysed.

Alternariol monomethyl ether was the most frequent (97%) Alternaria mycotoxin found on natural grasses during 2014. Alternariol, tenuazonic acid, tentoxin and macrosporin were detected in frequencies ranging from 88% to 25%. Altertoxin-I was detected at very low frequency (7%) in the samples analysed.

Aflatoxin was not detected in any grass sample analysed during both years evaluated, but sterigmatocystin and some of its precursors exhibited a very high prevalence (sterigmatocystin: 90% in 2011 and 60% in 2014; averantin; 80% in 2011 and 99% in 2014). Averufin, norsolorinic acid, averufanin, versicolorin C, nidurufin and versicolorin A were detected in frequencies >20% during both years.

Chanoclavin and curvularin were the most frequent Penicillium mycotoxin found on natural grass during both those years analyzed. Another eight metabolites (agroclavine, festuclavine, secalonic acid, dihydrogriseofulvin, dechlorogriseofulvin, brefeldin A and penicillide) produced by Penicillium species were also detected, but in low abundance ≤27% (see Table 1). Although some metabolites such as griseofulvin, dihydrogriseofulvin, dechlorogriseofulvin among others were found in low frequency, the maximum concentrations detected were very high in some samples.

Anthraquinones such as chrysophanol, emodin and skyrin that may be produced both by fungi and plants, were detected in high frequency (>80%) during both years and also at very high levels in some samples. However, physcion was detected in high frequency just in 2011 samples.

Cytochalasin B, C, D, H and J were detected in low frequency (≤20%), but some of them such as cytochalasin B was found in high concentration in some samples (1616 µg/kg).

The bacterial metabolite monactin was found at low prevalence (≤10%) and also at low levels only in grass samples collected during 2011 (data not shown).

3. Discussion

To our knowledge, the present study represents the first survey on multi-mycotoxin contamination occurrence in natural grasses used for beef animal production. It was noticeable that the LC-MS/MS method applied possessed the performance characteristics required to obtain accurate results. Out of the 175 natural grass samples analysed, all showed contamination, being co-occurrence the rule. The use of the multi-metabolites LC-MS/MS method allowed us to ascertain the extent of the natural grasses’ contamination. It is important to remark that the beef cattle grazing on both farms evaluated during 2011 and 2014 did not show any symptoms of mycotoxicosis. Since our main goal was to demonstrate that the farmers did not abuse the use of zeranol, we obtained samples in 2011, a year after the finding of zeranol in urine among cattle from both farms, in the paddocks where the cattle were grazing the year before. As we used a multi-toxin analytical method, we were able to detect co-occurrence of zearalenone and several metabolites for the first time in natural grasses. We conducted other sampling during 2014 in order to probe that our first findings were not a sporadic event, and to probe that it is normal to find zearalenone and other mycotoxins on natural grasses (uncultivated).

Numerous mycotoxins can be produced by fungi invading plant material; however, only few mycotoxins have been recognized as toxic to ruminants. The toxins detected in the present survey included the major mycotoxins of concern for ruminant health such as zearalenone, and trichothecenes, and others still not evaluated [4].

Common knowledge on animal mycotoxicosis indicates that ruminant animals are among the least susceptible animal species, as the rumen microflora effectively degrade and inactivate mycotoxins, hence protecting the animal [5]. Some microbes from the rumen have been identified for their ability to degrade mycotoxins or plant toxins. Among the first mycotoxins shown to be detoxified by ruminants were ochratoxin A [14], and aflatoxin B1 [15,16]. The metabolism of different mycotoxins potentially encountered by ruminants has also been investigated, and it has been found that the mycotoxins zearalenone, T-2 toxin, diacetoxyscirpenol and deoxynivalenol were well metabolized by whole rumen fluid, whereas aflatoxin B1 and ochratoxin A were not [17]. Kennedy et al. [9] reported that 90% of zearalenone was hydrolyzed to α-zearalenol by rumen microbes. Although the α form of zearalenone is more estrogenic than its parent form, due to the low rate of absorption, ruminants are less susceptible to zearalenone toxicity [18].

Among the few mycotoxins considered toxic for ruminants, none of the natural grass samples collected in both years were contaminated with aflatoxins, ochratoxin A, ergot alkaloids, gliotoxin among others. However, we were able to detect important metabolites such as trichothecenes type A, and B, sterigmatocistin and zearalenone.

Data on zearalenone and derivates detected during the present study are of concern if we consider, as an example, that beef cattle need to eat 10% of their weight body per day; an animal of 400 kg needs to eat 40 kg of natural grasses a day. Considering our results, 40 kg of natural grasses will result in an average daily intake of 3.38 mg of zearalenone and 2.0 mg α-zearalenol per animal. Kleinova et al. [19] when feeding heifers with similar amounts of zearalenone (oat contaminated with 2.74 mg zearalenone per animal) and a control group with zeranol implant (25 mg), found in urine samples of the treated and control animals similar concentrations of zeranol (α-zearalanol) and taleranol (β-zearalanol). In addition, in the heifers that have consumed oat contaminated with zearalenone, zearalenone, α-zearalenol and β-zearalenol in urine were also found. The present study showed that the presence of zeranol in urine of beef cattle could be not a consequence of illegal use of this banned substance, but the product of the natural occurrence of zearalenone and α-zearalenol in natural grasses intended for cattle feeding. The high prevalence of these metabolites during both years is remarkable being that their presence is not a sporadic event.

It is important to highlight the presence of zearalenone-4-sulfate in natural grass samples during both years. Sulfo-conjugation is part of the phase II detoxification process that plants and animals use to inactivate mycotoxins and other xenobiotics. It has also been demonstrated by Berthiller et al. [20] that Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings treated with zearalenone produced also zearalenone-4-sulfate. Zearalenone-4-sulfate formation seems to be a mechanism of self-protection. Despite its chemical alteration, there is evidence that the above mentioned metabolite has a similar toxic potential to those of their precursors when ingested with food, as attached functional groups like sulfate residues are likely to be enzymatically cleaved during digestion [21].

Among the type A trichothecenes, T-2 toxin, HT-2 toxin, neosolaniol and diacetoxyscirpenol were found in 2011 and 2014 and we did not find any significant differences in this group of mycotoxins between both years analysed. Some grass samples from 2011 showed very high concentration of T-2 toxin and HT-2 toxin, up to 5000 µg/kg d.m. each during 2011. T-2 and HT-2 toxin, the most prominent type A trichothecenes, often found together in plants, are some of the most toxic trichothecene detected in feed for cattle. Ruminants can rapidly de-acetylate T-2 toxin to HT-2 [22]. It is often difficult to distinguish the effects of T-2 toxin from HT-2 toxin in vivo; therefore, it is reasonable to sum up the concentrations of these toxins to evaluate clinical effects. T-2 toxin ingestion results in a severe irritation of the upper digestive tract, including a hemorrhagic ruminitis, due to its cytotoxic effects. The T-2 toxin is also believed to induce immune-suppression in cattle by decreasing serum concentrations of IgM, IgG and IgA, neutrophil functions and lymphocyte blastogenesis. Bovine infertility and abortion in the final trimester of gestation have also resulted from the consumption of feed contaminated with T-2 [6]. With the exception of T-2 toxin, cattle have not been adversely affected by others trichothecenes. The high levels of type A trichothecenes (especially T-2 and HT-2 toxins) can be explained due to the Fusarium species contamination. This assertion is supported by the mycological analysis of 2011 grass samples, which revealed that 100% of the samples were contaminated with Fusarium, being F. armeniacum the most common species found. Also, we have demonstrated that 50 selected F. armeniacum isolates were able to produce a broad range of type A trichothecenes (including T-2, HT-2, neosolaniol among others) [23]. Consequently, F. armeniacum could be responsible for the high prevalence of type A trichotheces on natural grasses analysed during the present study.

Deoxynivalenol and nivalenol were the only trichothecene type B found in natural grasses, at very low frequencies and levels during 2011. Deoxynivalenol was not present in 2014, while nivalenol was found at very low frequency but at higher concentrations than in 2011. Deoxynivalenol, the most prominent type B trichothecene present in cattle feed worldwide, is not considered to be acutely toxic; it is considered to be a major cause of economic loss due to reduced performance. Clinical signs include gastrointestinal problems, soft stools, diarrhea, increased susceptibility to other diseases and decreased performance. Cattle are resistant to the emetic effects of deoxynivalenol, but reduced food intake was observed at 10–20 mg/kg in ruminants [24]. During the present work, deoxynivalenol was detected in few samples (n = 9) and at concentrations lower than the guidance value provided by the European Commission for bovine feed. Nivalenol was found in low prevalence (22% and 3%) with all sample values below 831.80 µg/kg d.m., thereby presenting contamination levels within the range of surveys conducted elsewhere [25,26,27,28,29]. The risk associated with chronic exposure to low levels of nivalenol in animal feed is difficult to evaluate due to the limited data available in farm animals.

It is generally assumed that within the rumen the protozoal population has the highest capacity to detoxify ingested myctoxins, but this may vary between different classes of mycotoxins. The contribution of bacteria and other rumen organisms might have been underestimated, as generally only the overall capacity to degrade a given mycotoxin has been tested [27]. Several mycotoxins are, however, able to modify the rumen microbiota as they exert antimicrobial, anti-protozoal and antifungal activity; typical examples are patulin, fusaric acid, beauvericin and enniantins. The findings that mycotoxins impair the rumen microbiota correspond to the observation in clinical practice where, following a period of feeding mould contaminated silage to dairy cows, a reduced filling of the rumen, poor feed conversion, and mild diarrhea are observed [30,31]. The co-occurrence of mycotoxins observed in the present study is relevant considering their potential effects on the rumen microbiota.

Enniatins and beauvericin are cytotoxic cyclic hexadepsipeptides produced by several Fusarium species and are known to be toxic to insects, bacteria and fungi [32]. Enniatin B was the most prevalent enniatin mycotoxin, present in 70% of the samples during 2011, but all the enniatins were found in very low concentrations. In 2014 samples, enniantin B was the only one enniantin detected at very low frequency and levels. Beauvericin was present in all analysed grass samples in 2011 and in 43 during 2014, at levels within the concentration range reported by other studies [33,34]. There are no data that indicate that beauvericin has potential toxicity to cattle.

The occurrence of alternariol, alternariol methyl ether, tentoxin and altertoxin I was high in the analysed samples (99%–70%) during 2011. Although, in samples from 2014, alternariol and alternariol methyl ether were present at very high frequencies (88% and 97%), tentoxin and altertoxin I were found at lower frequencies than in 2011. Overall, maximum levels of alternariol were higher than those reported in the literature with the exception of sunflower. Alternaria species produce more than 70 phytotoxins, but a small proportion of them has been chemically characterized and reported to act as mycotoxins to humans and animals. Some toxins such as alternariol, alternariol methyl ether, tenuazonic acid and altertoxins are described to induce harmful effects in animals, including fetotoxic and teratogenic effects. At present, knowledge of the possible effects of Alternaria toxins on farm and companion animals as well as the database describing the occurrence of these mycotoxins in feedstuffs are scarce and insufficient to assess the risk regarding Alternaria toxins for animal health [35].

Occurrence data on equisetin and monocerin on animal feed are very limited [36]. Both mentioned metabolites were found at very high frequencies in both years (>90%) and at very high concentration in some samples analysed in the present study. Equisetin was reported as a metabolite of F. equiseti and F. semitectum with weak activity against gram-positive bacteria and other cytotoxic activities [37]. Equisetin has been found as a natural contaminant in corn, wheat silage and corn silage but at concentrations lower than those obtained during the present study [36,38]. Monocerin is a polyketide fungal metabolite that exhibits antifungal, insecticidal, and plant pathogenic properties. It has been isolated from several fungal species [39]. Monocerin was present in all grass samples under study, at relatively high concentrations comparable with those found by Shimshoni et al. [36] on corn silage. The toxic effect of this metabolite on ruminants is still unknown.

Aflatoxins were not detected during the present study, although we were able to detect several precursors (some at very high frequencies) in the biosynthetic aflatoxin (AF) pathway. This suggests Aspergillus versicolor as the fungal producer The general accepted AF biosynthetic pathway scheme is: A hexanol CoA precursor → norsolorinic acid, NOR → averantin, AVN → hydroxyaverantin, HAVN → Oxoaverantin, OAVN → averufin, AVF → Hydroxyversicolorone, HVN → versiconal hemicetal acetate, VHA → versiconal, VAL → versicolorin B, VERB → versicolorin A, VERA → demethyl-sterigmatocystin, DMST → sterigmatocystin , ST O-methylsterigmatocystin, OMST → aflatoxin B1, AFB1 and aflatoxin G1, AFG1. After the VHA step, there is a branch point in the pathway that leads to AFB1 and AFG1 formation as well as AFB2 and AFG2 [40]. In particular ST, the penultimate precursor of AF, is produced by more than 50 fungal species, including Aspergillus flavus, A. parasiticus, A. versicolor and A. nidulans, of which A. versicolor is the most common source. ST shares its biosynthetic pathway with aflatoxins. A. nidulans and A. versicolor are apparently unable to biotransform ST into OMST, the direct precursor of AFB1 and AFG1. Consequently, substrates colonized by these fungi can contain high amounts of ST, while substrates invaded by A. flavus and A. parasiticus contain only low amounts of ST as most of it is converted into AFs. ST was detected in 90% and 60% of the grass samples analysed during 2011 and 2014, respectively. Owing to the structural similarities, AFs and ST share prominent toxic effects, including genotoxicity and carcinogenicity, being the AFs considered 150–200 times more potent than ST [41]. However, in contrast to AFs, only limited information on occurrence and toxicity of ST is available. Only limited data are available for other ruminants, but a case report describes haemorrhages and bloody diarrhea in cattle following exposure to ST [42]. Some grass samples showed very high levels of contamination with ST (up to 730 µg/kg d.m.) if we consider the guidance of the European Parliament [43] for feed, the concentration of ST must be regarded as significant.

Among the Penicillium metabolites, we were unable to detect in any samples patulin, mycophenolic acid, roquefortine C and PR toxin that are common mycotoxins found in grass silage around the world [44].

Several infrequently reported anthraquinone derivates produced by fungi and plants were found during the present research, such as emodin, its methy-derivate physcion and chrysophanol and its respective dimer skyrin. The high maximum concentration detected of the above mentioned metabolites is also remarkable, mainly in samples from 2011. All these anthraquinones are commonly found on plants belonging to the Poligonaceae family, and have been reported as antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, antiviral anti-ulcerogenic and anticancer agents. Also, all these compounds play well-documented roles as chemopreventive effects [45].

During this study we have detected one bacterial metabolite with antibiotic activity: monactin at very low frequency (<10%) and concentrations in 2011 grass samples. This metabolite is a member of the macrotetrolide complex produced by a range of Streptomyces species [46]. At present, no data are available regarding the effect of this antibiotic present in grasses on ruminants.

We did not detect any of the indole-diterpenoid alkaloids in the natural grasses under study. These compounds are produced by species of the Claviceps genus within the Hypocreales that can infest plant species belonging to Poaceae (family of the true grasses). In Argentina, mycotoxicosis among cattle has been reported due to the presence of indol-diterpenoid tremorgens, produced by Claviceps paspali present in grasses such as Paspalum dilatatum and P. notatum and by Claviceps cynodontis present on Cynodon dactylon. Also, ryegrass staggers caused by the endophytic fungi Neotyphodium lolii (that produce indol-diterpenoid alkaloids) in Lolium perenne occurs frequently in cattle in Argentina. Gangrenous ergotism caused by C. purpurea and Festuca elation has also been observed [47].

This study showed new and original data on the presence of multi-fungal and bacterial metabolites on natural grasses (non-cultivated) used for grazing cattle. Only few studies have investigated the presence of mycotoxins but just on cultivated grasses used as forage (mainly silage) for cattle feeding, most of them focus on few mycotoxins such as deoxynivalenol, zearalenone, fumonisins and aflatoxins [48,49,50].

4. Experimental Section

4.1. Sampling

Natural grass samples were obtained from two beef cattle farms located in the Chaco province of Argentina, included in the Ramsar site. One hundred and six grass samples (53 from each farm) were collected during July 2011, and 69 during July 2014. On each farm, a paddock of around 1000 ha was chosen for sampling. Each sample, corresponding to one plant, was cut at ground level and transported to the laboratory in a paper bag. The aerial harvested portions of plants, including leaf and stems, were immediately oven dried at 60 °C for 48 h or until constant weight, indicating that the entire aqueous portion was extracted from plant tissues. Since the sampling was done during winter, it was not possible to identify the grasses up to species level due to the absence of inflorescence but we can confirm that all belong to the Poaceae family.

The two cattle farms were located in the wetland of Chaco region in Argentina. This region covers part of the Parana and Paraguay rivers floodplain complex in the eastern border of Chaco Province and it is limited to the north by the Bermejo River which surrounds the city of Resistencia. The hydrological regimes of each river give rise to different pulses of flood and drought in these wetlands, regulating flood downstream and retaining waters in times of drought. The landscape is complex open water, aquatic vegetation, grasslands and gallery forests. The annual temperature ranges between 20 and 24 °C. Maximum absolute temperatures can peak at 46.5 °C. Mean annual rainfall is 1300 mm, concentrated in spring and summer. The most common species of grasses in the area under study are Leersia hexandra, Luziola peruviana, Sorghastrum setosum, Spartina argentinensis, Cynodon dactylon between others [51].

4.2. Mycotoxin Analysis

4.2.1. Chemicals and Reagents

Methanol (LC gradient grade) and glacial acetic acid (p.a.) were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), acetonitrile (LC gradient grade) from VWR (Leuven, Belgium), and ammonium acetate (MS grade) from Sigma-Aldrich (Vienna, Austria). Water was purified successively by reverse osmosis and an Elga Purelab ultra analytic system from Veolia Water (Bucks, UK) to 18.2 MΩ.

Standards of fungal and bacterial metabolites were obtained either as gifts from various research groups or from the following commercial sources: Romer Labs® Inc. (Tulln, Austria), Sigma-Aldrich (Vienna, Austria), Iris Biotech GmbH (Marktredwitz, Germany), Axxora Europe (Lausanne, Switzerland) and LGC Promochem GmbH (Wesel, Germany). Stock solutions of each analyte were prepared by dissolving the solid substance in acetonitrile (preferably), acetonitrile/water 1:1 (v/v), methanol, methanol/water 1:1 (v/v) or water. Thirty-four combined working solutions were prepared by mixing the stock solutions of the corresponding analytes for easier handling, and were stored at −20 °C. The final working solution was freshly prepared prior to spiking experiments by mixing the combined working solutions.

4.2.2. Extraction and Estimation of Apparent Recoveries

Three grams of each grass sample, previously pulverized in a mill with a 1 mm2 mesh (Cyclotech, Foss Tecator, Höganäs, Sweden), were weighed into a 50 mL polypropylene tube (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany) and 20 mL of the extraction solvent (acetonitrile/water/acetic acid 79:20:1, v/v/v) were added. For spiking experiments, 0.25 g sample was used for extraction. Samples were extracted for 90 min on a GFL 3017 rotary shaker (GFL, Burgwedel, Germany) and diluted 1 + 1 with dilution solvent (acetonitrile/water/acetic acid 20:79:1, v/v/v). Five microliters of the diluted extracts were subsequently injected [13].

4.2.3. LC-MS/MS Parameters

The LC-MS/MS has been previously described by Vishwanath et al. [52], but has been transformed to a more sensitive mass spectrometer and has been further extended [12]. Analysis was performed with a QTrap 5500 LC-MS/MS System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) equipped with TurboIonSpray electrospray ionization (ESI) source and a 1290 Series HPLC System (Agilent, Waldbronn, Germany). Chromatographic separation was performed at 25 °C on a Gemini C18-column, 150 × 4.6 mm i.d., 5 μm particle size, equipped with a C18 4 × 3 mm i.d. security guard cartridge (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA).

ESI-MS/MS was performed in the time-scheduled multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode both in positive and negative polarities in two separate chromatographic runs per sample by scanning two fragmentation reactions per analyte. The MRM detection window of each analyte was set to its expected retention time ±27 s and ±48 s in the positive and the negative modes, respectively. Confirmation of positive analyte identification was obtained by the acquisition of two MRMs per analyte (with the exception of moniliformin and 3-nitropropionic acid, that exhibited only one fragment ion). This yielded 4.0 identification points according to the European Union Commission decision 2002/657 [53]. In addition, the LC retention time and the intensity ratio of the two MRM transitions agreed with the related values of an authentic standard within 0.1 min and 30%, respectively.

Quantification was performed using external calibration based on serial dilution of a multi-analyte stock solution. Results were corrected by apparent recoveries that had been determined by spiking five different blank samples at two concentration levels.

4.3. Statistical Analysis

Each particular metabolite concentration was evaluated by analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine any differences between the years of sampling. The data were Log10 transformed to create a normal distribution. When the analysis was statistically significant, the post hoc Tukey’s multiple comparison procedure was used for separation of the means. Statistical significance was judged at the level p ≤ 0.01. All the analyses were done using SigmaStat for Windows Version 2.03 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

5. Conclusions

A broad range (up to 77) of fungal metabolites was present in natural grasses (Poaceae) during two different years, and co-occurrence was the rule. It is important to point out that the profile of common metabolites was shared during both years of sampling, and also that the occurrence of important metabolites is not an exceptional phenomenon but seems to be very common. Some metabolites present such as type A trichothecenes (T-2 and HT-2), zearalenone and derivates are of concern for ruminants. Partial degradation in the rumen does mean that they are less toxic to cattle than to other animals, but some of these degradation products can be more toxic than the original mycotoxin. There are some studies on synergistic effects and only a few of them include those metabolites that were the most prevalent in our study. So, it cannot be ruled out that low levels of several mycotoxins might be more problematic than high levels of an individual mycotoxin, due to their synergistic relationship.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from SECyT-UNRC and CONICET grant N° 112 201201 005525 CO (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas). Nichea M.J. and Palacios S.A. are CONICET fellows and Ramirez M.L., Torres A.M., Chulze S.N. and Chiacchiera S.M. are members of the Research Career of CONICET. The LC-MS/MS system was funded by the Federal Country Lower Austria and co-financed by the European regional development fund of the European Union.

Author Contributions

M.J.N. and S.A.P. performed the samples collection and preparation, S.M.C., M.S. and R.K. performed the metabolites analysis. M.L.R., A.M.T. and S.N.C. conceived and designed the experiments. M.L.R. and M.J.N. analysed the data and wrote the paper. M.S., S.N.C. and A.M.T. revised the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Arelovich H.M., Bravo R.D., Martinez M.F. Development, characteristic, and trends for beef cattle production in Argentina. Anim. Front. 2011;1:37–45. doi: 10.2527/af.2011-0021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Garcia P.T., Pensela N.A., Sancho A.M., Latimori N.J., Kloster A.M., Amigone M.A., Casal J.J. Beef lipids in relation to animal breed and nutrition in Argentina. Meat Sci. 2008;79:500–508. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rotolo G.C., Rydberg T., Lieblein G., Francis C. Emergy evaluation of grazing cattle in Argentina’s Pampas. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2007;119:383–395. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2006.08.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mostrom M., Jacobsen B. Ruminant mycotoxicosis. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2011;27:315–344. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2011.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fink-Gremmels J. Mycotoxins in cattle feeds and carry-over to dairy milk: A review. Food Addit. Contam. Part A. 2008;25:172–180. doi: 10.1080/02652030701823142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zain M. Impact of mycotoxins on humans and animals. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2011;15:129–144. doi: 10.1016/j.jscs.2010.06.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mathews K.H., Vanderveer M. Economic Research Service, USDA; [(accessed on 20 February 2015)]. Beef Production, Markets, and Trade in Argentina and Uruguay: An Overview. Available online: http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/ldpm-livestock,-dairy,-and-poultry-outlook/ldpm-15901.aspx. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Alonso V.A., Pereyra C.M., Keller L.A.M., Dalcero A.M., Rosa C.A.R., Chiacchiera S.M., Cavaglieri L.R. Fungi and mycotoxins in silage: An overview (Review) J. Appl. Microbiol. 2013;115:637–643. doi: 10.1111/jam.12178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kennedy D.G., Hewitt S.A., McEvoy J.D., Currie J.W., Cannavan A., Blanchflower W.J., Elliot C.T. Zeranol is formed from Fusarium sp. toxins in cattle in vivo. Food Adit. Contam. 1998;15:393–400. doi: 10.1080/02652039809374658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Smith J.F., Morris C.A. Review of zearalenone studies with sheep in New Zealand. Proc. N. Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 2006;66:306–310. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ramsar Convention Secretariat . The Ramsar Convention Manual: A Guide to the Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar, Iran, 1971) 6th ed. Ramsar Convention Secretariat; Gland, Switzerland: 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Malachova A., Sulyok M., Beltrán E., Berthiller F., Krska R. Optimization and validation of a quantitative liquid chromatography — Tandem mass spectrometric method covering 295 bacterial and fungal metabolites including all relevant mycotoxins in four model food matrices. J. Chromatogr. A. 2014;1362:145–156. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.08.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sulyok M., Berthiller F., Kraska R., Shhuhmacher R. Development and validation of a liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometric method for the determination of 39 mycotoxins in wheat and maize. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2006;20:2649–2659. doi: 10.1002/rcm.2640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hult K., Telling A., Gatenbeck S. Degradation of ochratoxin A in ruminants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1976;32:443–444. doi: 10.1128/aem.32.3.443-444.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Allcroft R., Robert B.A., Lloyd M.K. Excretion of aflatoxin in a lactating cow. Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 1968;6:619–625. doi: 10.1016/0015-6264(68)90311-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Engel V.G., Hagemeister H. Untersuchungenueber den verblieb von aflatoxin B1 im Verdaaundtarkt von Kuehen. Milchwissenschaft. 1978;33:21–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kiessling K.H., Pettersson H., Sandholm K. Metabolism of aflatoxin, ochratoxin, zearalenone, and three trichothecenes by intact rumen fluid, rumen protozoa, and rumen bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1984;47:1070–1073. doi: 10.1128/aem.47.5.1070-1073.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Seeling K., Lebzien P., Danicke S., Spilke J., Sudekum K.H., Flachowsky G. Effects of level of feed intake and Fusarium toxin contaminated wheat on rumen fermentation as well as on blood and milk parameters in cows. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2006;90:103–110. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2005.00570.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kleinova M., Zöllner P., Kahlbacher H., Hochsteiner W., Lindner W. Metabolic profiles of the mycotoxin zearalenone and of the growth promoter zeranol in urine, liver, and muscle of heifers. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002;50:4769–4776. doi: 10.1021/jf020160p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Berthiller F., Werner U., Sulyok M., Krska R., Hauser M.T., Schuhmacher R. Liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) determination of phase II metabolites of the mycotoxin zearalenone in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Food Addit. Contam. 2006;23:1194–1200. doi: 10.1080/02652030600778728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Plasencia J., Mirocha C.J. Isolation and characterization of zearalenone sulfate produced by Fusarium spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1991;57:146–150. doi: 10.1128/aem.57.1.146-150.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhou T., He J., Gong J. Microbial transformation of trichothecene mycotoxins. World Mycotoxin J. 2008;1:23–30. doi: 10.3920/WMJ2008.x003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nichea M.J., Cendoya E., Zachetti V.G.L., Chiacchiera S.M., Sulyok M., Krska R., Torres A.M., Chulze S.N., Ramirez M.L. Mycotoxin profile of Fusarium armeniacum isolated from natural grasses intended for cattle feed. World Mycotoxin J. 2015;8:451–457. doi: 10.3920/WMJ2014.1770. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Osweiler G.D. Mycotoxins-contemporary issues of food animal health and productivity. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2000;16:511–530. doi: 10.1016/s0749-0720(15)30084-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Eckard S., Wettstein F.E., Forrer H.R.Y., Vogelsang S. Incidence of Fusarium species and mycotoxins in silage maize. Toxins. 2011;3:949–967. doi: 10.3390/toxins3080949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Schollenberger M., Müller H.M., Rüfle M., Suchy S., Plank S., Drochner W. Natural occurrence of 16 Fusarium toxins in grains and feedstuffs of plant origin from Germany. Mycopathologia. 2006;161:43–52. doi: 10.1007/s11046-005-0199-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Streit E., Schatzmayr G., Tassis P., Tzika E., Marin D., Taranu I., Tabuc C., Nicolau A., Aprodu I., Puel O., et al. Current situation of mycotoxin contamination and co-occurrence in animal feed-focus on Europe. Toxins. 2012;4:788–809. doi: 10.3390/toxins4100788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sulyok M., Krska R., Schuhmacher R. A liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometric multi-mycotoxin method for the quantification of 87 analytes and its application to semiquantitative screening of moldy food samples. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2007;389:1505–1523. doi: 10.1007/s00216-007-1542-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Van Asselt E.D., Azambuja W., Moretti A., Kastelein P., De Rijk T.C., Stratakou I., van der Fels-Klerx H.J. A Dutch field study on fungal infection and mycotoxin concentrations in maize. Food Addit. Contam. 2012;29:1556–1565. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2012.689997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hadley G., Wolf C., Harsh S. Dairy cattle culling patterns, explanations, and implications. J. Dairy Sci. 2006;89:2286–2296. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72300-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wenz J., Jensen S., Lombard J., Wagner B., Dinsmore R. Herd management practices and their association with bulk tank somatic cell count on United States dairy operations. J. Dairy Sci. 2007;90:3652–3659. doi: 10.3168/jds.2006-592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wang Q., Xu L. Beauvericin, a bioactive compound produced by fungi: A short review. Molecules. 2012;17:2367–2377. doi: 10.3390/molecules17032367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sulyok M., Krska R., Schuhmacher R. Application of an LC-MS/MS based multi-mycotoxin method for the semi-quantitative determination of mycotoxins occurring in different types of food infected by moulds. Food Chem. 2010;119:408–416. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.07.042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Warth B., Parich A., Atehnkeng J., Bandyopadhyay R., Schuhmacher R., Sulyok M., Krska R. Quantitation of mycotoxins in food and feed from Burkina Faso and Mozambique using a modern LC-MS/MS multitoxin method. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012;60:9352–9363. doi: 10.1021/jf302003n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.European Food Safety Authority Scientific Opinion on the risks for animal and public health related to the presence of Alternaria toxins in feed and food. EFSA J. 2011;9:2407–2497. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shimshoni J.A., Cuneah O., Sulyok M., Krska R., Galon N., Sharir B., Shlosberg A. Mycotoxins in corn and wheat silage in Israel. Food Addit. Contam. Part A. 2013;30:1614–1625. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2013.802840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Desjardins A. Fusarium Mycotoxins: Chemistry, Genetics and Biology. APS Press; St. Paul, MN, USA: 2006. pp. 79–108. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mogensen J.M., Sørensen S.M., Sulyok M., van der Westhuizen L., Shephard G.S., Frisvad J.C., Thrane U., Krska R., Nielsen K.F. Single kernel analysis of fumonisins and other fungal metabolites in maize from South African subsistence farmers. Food Addit. Contam. Part A. 2011;28:1724–1734. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2011.611823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Axford L., Simpson T., Willis C. Synthesis and incorporation of the first polyketide synthase free intermediate in monocerin biosynthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004;43:727–730. doi: 10.1002/anie.200352652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yu J. Current understanding on aflatoxin biosynthesis and future perspective in reducing aflatoxin contamination. Toxins. 2012;4:1024–1057. doi: 10.3390/toxins4111024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Versilovskis A., de Saeger S. Sterigmatocystin: Occurrence in foodstuffs and analytical methods-an overview. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2010;54:136–147. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.200900345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.European Food Safety Authority Scientific Opinion on the risk for public and animal health related to the presence of sterigmatocystin in food and feed. EFSA J. 2013;11 doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3254. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.European Parliament Directive 2002/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 May 2002 on undesirable substances in animal feed. Off. J. L. 2002;140:10–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.O’Brien M., Nielsen K.F., O’Kiely P., Forristal P.D., Fuller H.T., Frisvad J.C. Mycotoxins and other secondary metabolites produced in vitro by Penicillium paneum Frisvad and Penicillium roqueforti Thom isolated from baled grass silage in Ireland. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006;54:9268–9276. doi: 10.1021/jf0621018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hsu S.-C., Chung J.-G. Anticancer potential of emodin. Biomedicine. 2012;2:108–116. doi: 10.1016/j.biomed.2012.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Jizba J., Sedmera P., Zima J., Beran M., Blumauerová M., Kandybin N.V., Samoukina G.V. Macrotetrolide antibiotics produced by Streptomyces globisporus. Folia Microbiol. 1991;36:437–443. doi: 10.1007/BF02884062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Riet-Correa F., Rivero R., Odriozola E., Adrien M., Medeiros R.M.T., Schild A.L. Mycotoxicoses of ruminants and horses. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2013;25:692–708. doi: 10.1177/1040638713504572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Driehuis F., Spanjer M.C., Scholten J.M., Te Giffel M.C. Occurrence of mycotoxins in maize, grass and wheat silage for dairy cattle in the Netherlands. Food Addit. Contam. Part B Surveill. 2008;1:41–50. doi: 10.1080/19393210802236927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Reed K.F.M., Moore D.D. A preliminary survey of zearalenone and other mycotoxins in Australian silage and pasture. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2009;49:696–703. doi: 10.1071/EA08164. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Skládanka J., Nedělník J., Adam V., Doležal P., Moravcová H., Dohnal V. Forage as a primary source of mycotoxins in animal diets. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2011;8:37–50. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8010037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Canevari P., Blanco D.E., Bucher E.H., Castro G., Davison I., editors. Los Humedales de la Argentina. Clasificación, situación actual, conservación y legislación. Volume 46. Wetlands International Publication; Buenos Aires, Argentina: 1998. p. 208. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Vishwanath V., Sulyok M., Labuda R., Bicker W., Krska R. Simultaneous determination of 186 fungal and bacterial metabolites in indoor matrices by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2009;395:1355–1372. doi: 10.1007/s00216-009-2995-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.European Commission Commission Decision of 12 August 2002 implementing Council Directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results. Off. J. Eur. Union. 2002;29:10–32. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Toxins are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES