Skip to main content
BMJ Open logoLink to BMJ Open
. 2015 Aug 21;5(8):e008641. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008641

Characteristics of women who practice yoga in different locations during pregnancy

Holger Cramer 1,2, Jane Frawley 2, Amie Steel 2,3, Helen Hall 2,4, Jon Adams 2, Alex Broom 5, David Sibbritt 2
PMCID: PMC4550706  PMID: 26297372

Abstract

Objectives

Yoga practice during pregnancy is gaining increasing popularity. This study examined the characteristics of pregnant women who practiced yoga in regard to the different locations (at home, in yoga classes, or both).

Design

The study sample was drawn from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health (ALSWH), a national longitudinal study of women to investigate multiple factors affecting health and well-being of women over a 20-year period.

Setting

Postal survey.

Participants

Women born between 1973 and 1978, who were randomly selected from the national Medicare database and identified as being pregnant or having recently given birth (n=2316).

Outcome measures

Relationships between yoga use (attending yoga classes and/or practising yoga at home) and women's characteristics (demographic measures, pregnancy-related health concerns, health service utilisation, attitudes to complementary and alternative medicine).

Results

Practising yoga both at home and in classes was associated with perceiving complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) as preventative (odds ratio (OR)=1.62); perceiving CAM as affording health control (OR=1.50); experiencing sadness (OR=1.72); preparing for labour (OR=2.31); birthing in a birth centre (OR=7.97); and experiencing less vomiting (OR=0.38). Practising at home only was associated with perceiving CAM as affording health control (OR=1.76); perceiving CAM as promoting a holistic health approach (OR=1.65); and birthing in a birth centre (OR=3.54). Practising in classes only was associated with experiencing stress (OR=1.97); and birthing in a birth centre (OR=4.85) (all p<0.05).

Conclusions

The findings suggest that the location in which a woman practices yoga is associated with attitudinal, health-related and birth environmental factors.

Keywords: COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE, OBSTETRICS, YOGA


Strengths and limitations of this study.

  • A strength of the reported study is the large nationally-representative sample of pregnant women.

  • A further strength is the high response rate.

  • The differentiation between different forms of yoga use based on location type is another strength.

  • The interpretability of the findings is limited by the self-report of the respondents (introducing the possibility of recall bias).

  • The specific age range (31–37 years) of the participants is a further limitation.

Introduction

Women are high adopters of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM)—generally defined as products and services that are outside of the dominant healthcare model, with many of these treatments being used specifically for women's health issues.1–5 CAM use during pregnancy is also very popular. A recent review found that between 20% and 60% of expectant women use CAM2 and, furthermore, utilisation rates are continuing to increase.6 Pregnant women may turn to CAM for a variety of reasons, including a belief that the different CAM therapies: enable greater choice and control over their childbearing experience; offer a safe alternative reducing the need for medical intervention; provide an approach congruent with their holistic health beliefs.7 8

Yoga is a common CAM used by pregnant women.6 9 10 Yoga is rooted in Indian philosophy and has been a part of traditional Indian spiritual, philosophical and psychological practice for millennia.11 12 While the original goal of yoga was to unite mind, body and spirit through ethical, spiritual and physical practices,11 12 in more contemporary practice, it is mainly regarded as a means to promote physical and mental well-being through physical postures (asanas), breathing techniques (pranayama) and meditation (dyana).11 13 These more physically oriented yoga forms are gaining increased popularity as a therapeutic practice, with about 9% of the American adult population reporting yoga use in 2012. Furthermore, more than two-thirds of those people using yoga did so with the explicit intention of improving their health status.14 Yoga is typically practiced in yoga classes, however, many yoga users complement these supervised sessions with unsupervised yoga practice at home;13 and almost half of American adult yoga users practiced only at home and did not attend yoga classes at all in 2012.14 This distinction with regard to location is important. On the one hand, some have suggested practising yoga without supervision from an adequately trained yoga teacher may lead to possible undesirable health outcomes such as injuries.15–17 Contrastingly, others suggest that the home practice of yoga may enhance the health benefits gained from such practice, such as pain relief.18

In a US nationally-representative survey, the typical yoga user has been shown to be female and of reproductive age.19 Likewise, 85% of Australian yoga users were reported to be female and 61% to be less than 45 years of age.20 Of these yoga users, 3% and 4% cited pregnancy as a motivation for initiating and continuing yoga practice, respectively. Further to this, between 17% and 19% of Australian women practice yoga during pregnancy.6 21 While antenatal yoga has been claimed to hold therapeutic benefits beyond other forms of exercise,22 the number of clinical trials investigating the effects of yoga in pregnant women remains limited;23 24 most data does, however, demonstrate a positive association between the practice of yoga and pregnancy, labour and birth outcomes.

Despite the popularity of yoga and its potential to improve infant and maternal outcomes, little is known about the characteristics of women who practice it during pregnancy. Moreover, differences between women practising yoga at home and those attending yoga classes have not been investigated. Thus, the aim of this study was to examine characteristics of pregnant women who practice yoga at home, in yoga classes or both.

Methodology

Sample

The study sample was drawn from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health (ALSWH). The ALSWH, which began in 1996, is a national longitudinal study of women in three cohorts (‘young’ born 1973–1978; ‘mid-age’ born 1946–1951; and ‘older’ born 1921–1926) who were randomly selected from the national Medicare database to investigate multiple factors affecting health and well-being of women over a 20-year period. In the Survey, five women from the ‘young’ cohort who were identified as being pregnant or having recently given birth (n=2316) were invited to participate in a substudy in 2010. The 85 item self-administered questionnaire addressed areas of health service utilisation, attitudes to CAM, health status and demographics. Ethics approval for the sub-study reported here was gained from the relevant ethics committees at the University of Queensland, University of Newcastle and University of Technology Sydney.

Demographic measures

Data on women's degree of income manageability, employment status, highest educational qualification and marital status were collected. Postcode of residence was used to classify residence as urban or non-urban.

Pregnancy-related health concerns

Information was collected on 25 common pregnancy complaints such as emotional well-being (eg, sadness, perceived stress), nausea and vomiting. Women were also asked to identify if they actively prepared for labour. The full list of health issues included in this survey has been reported elsewhere previously.25

Health service utilisation

Women provided information about their consultations with maternity care providers including general practitioners, midwives and obstetricians. Information was also collected regarding women's birth choices such as whether women decided to give birth in a private or public hospital setting, in a birth centre or at home. Women were asked to indicate if they practised yoga at home, attended classes or both. These categories were defined through responses to the following survey items: During pregnancy, how many times did you visit each of these alternative health practitioners for pregnancy-related health conditions? (response option: yoga/meditation classes); With regard to your use of the following treatments (if applicable) during the pregnancy for your youngest child specifically for pregnancy-related health issues, who prescribed these treatments?” (response option: meditation/yoga at home). For the purpose of this analysis, participants were then sorted into three groups depending on their responses to these two items: women who only identified as practising yoga at home; women who only identified as attending yoga/meditation classes; and women who identified as practising yoga/meditation at home and attending classes.

Attitudes to complementary and alternative medicine

The questionnaire included items that specifically examined women's attitudes to CAM, focusing on aspects such as its value in relation to conventional medicine, the level of control afforded by CAM use, the influence of evidence on their use of CAM, the need for testing of CAM and principles of holism within CAM care.

Statistical analysis

The women were categorised, based on their yoga use, into three categories: women who attended yoga classes and practised yoga at home; women who only practised yoga at home; and women who only attended yoga classes. Relationships between yoga use across all three categories and women's characteristics (ie, demographic, pregnancy health, health service utilisation and attitudinal items) were determined using a χ2 test. Based on these statistical tests, all demographic, health service utilisation, attitudinal and pregnancy health variables identified as having a p value<0.2526 were entered into individual models for each yoga use category and then a stepwise backward elimination process was employed, using a likelihood ratio test, to eventually produce the most parsimonious model. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. All analyses were conducted using statistical program Stata 11.2 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas, USA).

Results

A total of 1835 women completed the questionnaire, generating a response rate of 79.2%. Respondents lived primarily in either urban (62.4%) or rural (34.6%) localities. Income manageability among the respondents varied with 58.9% of women reporting it was usually or always ok to manage on available income and 41.1% reporting it was difficult some or all of the time. Almost all the women were married or in a defacto relationship (96.3%), and most held a qualification such as an apprenticeship or diploma (23.9%), university degree (36.7%) or postgraduate university degree (23.4%). Most women had private health insurance at the time of the birth of their child (71.1%), and a private hospital (54.1%) was a more common birth environment for their most recent birth when compared with public hospital births (41.5%) (table 1).

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of participants (n=1835)

Demographics All participants (n=1835)
n Per cent
Area of residence
 Urban 1134 62.4
 Rural 629 34.6
 Remote 55 3.0
Financial status
 Always difficult to manage on available income 221 12.1
 Sometimes difficult to manage on available income 530 29.0
 Managing on available income is not too bad 768 42.1
 Easy to manage on available income 307 16.8
Number of children
 None 89 4.9
 One 697 38.0
 Two 700 38.2
 Three or more 349 19.0
Marital status
 Never married 21 1.2
 Married/de facto 1760 96.3
 Separated/divorced/widowed 46 2.5
Qualifications
 Year 12 qualification or less 292 16.0
 Apprenticeship or diploma qualification 435 23.9
 University degree 1095 60.1
Insurance status
 Private health insurance 1296 71.1
 No private health insurance 527 28.9
Conventional maternity health professionals
 General practitioner 1562 90.1
 Midwife 983 64.7
 Obstetrician 1416 85.2
Birth environment
 Public hospital 751 41.5
 Private hospital (or private patient at public hospital) 981 54.1
 Birth centre/community 80 4.4
mean SD
Age 34.95 2.30

Table 2 outlines the characteristics of the different subgroups of women (based on location of yoga practice) as identified through logistic regression modelling. Of all women surveyed, 172 (12.1%) practised yoga at home and attended classes, 122 (8.3%) practised yoga at home only and 45 (3.0%) attended yoga classes only. Women who practised yoga at home and also attended yoga classes were less likely to have part-time employment (OR 0.52, p=0.003) or to be unemployed (OR 0.18, p<0.001) compared with other women. The women identified as attending classes and practising yoga at home were also less likely to be living in a rural location (OR 0.53, p=0.006) compared with women not engaging in both or either of these practices. This particular subgroup of women were more likely to perceive CAM as being better at prevention than conventional medicine (OR 1.62, p=0.004), affording them more control over their health or body (OR 1.50, p=0.02). Women using yoga in home and class settings were more likely than other women to report experiencing sadness during their pregnancy (OR 1.72, p=0.011) and identified as preparing for labour (OR 2.31, p<0.001), but were less likely to have experienced repeated vomiting (OR 0.38, p=0.011). Women using yoga in home and class settings were also more likely to have birthed their most recent baby in a birth centre (OR 7.97, p<0.001).

Table 2.

Characteristics of the different subgroups of women based on location of yoga practice

Yoga classes and home practice (n=172/1420) Yoga home practice only (n=122/1473) Yoga classes only (n=45/1505)
OR (95% CI), p Value OR (95% CI), p Value OR (95% CI) p Value
Demographics
Education
 Year 12
 Trade/certificate 2.27 (1.00 to 5.14), p=0.050
 University 2.54 (1.18 to 5.43), p=0.016
Work
 Full-time
 Part-time 0.52 (0.34 to 0.80), p=0.003
 Casual 0.60 (0.29 to 1.25), p=0.173
 Not working 0.18 (0.10 to 0.32), p<0.001
Area
 Urban
 Rural 0.53 (0.34 to 0.83), p=0.006
 Remote 0.43 (0.09 to 2.02), p=0.290
Attitudes
CAM is a better preventative than conventional medicine 1.62 (1.17 to 2.25), p=0.004
CAM gives me more control over my health/body 1.50 (1.07 to 2.12), p=0.020 1.76 (1.25 to 2.48), p=0.001
Knowledge about the evidence of CAM is important to me as a patient 2.02 (1.35 to 3.02), p=0.001
CAM promotes a holistic approach to health 1.65 (1.09 to 2.49), p=0.019
CAM needs to be tested for safety/side effects 3.27 (1.44 to 7.41), p=0.005
Pregnancy health conditions
Sadness 1.72 (1.13 to 2.62), p=0.011
Stress 1.97 (1.03 to 3.77), p=0.041
Repeat vomiting 0.38 (0.18 to 0.80), p=0.011
Preparation for labour 2.31 (1.57 to 3.40), p<0.001
Birth environment
Public hospital
Private hospital 1.30 (0.87 to 1.96), p=0.198 0.92 (0.61 to 1.40), p=0.712 2.15 (1.04 to 4.41), p=0.038
Birth centre 7.97 (3.88 to 16.37), p<0.001 3.54 (1.70 to 7.36), p=0.001 4.85 (1.43 to 16.43), p=0.011

CAM, Complementary and alternative medicine.

Women who only practised yoga at home and did not attend yoga classes were much more likely to have attained an apprenticeship or diploma (OR 2.27, p=0.003), or had university level education (OR 2.54, p=0.016) when compared with other women. Women only undertaking yoga practice at home were also more likely to perceive CAM as: affording them more control over their health and body (OR 1.76, p=0.001); promoting a more holistic approach to health (OR 1.65, p=0.019); needing to be tested for safety and side effects (OR 3.27, p=0.005). Women only undertaking yoga practice at home were also more likely to report having given birth in a birth centre for their most recent pregnancy (OR 3.54, p=0.001). Women who were identified as only attending yoga classes, and not practising yoga at home, were more likely to report experiencing stress during their pregnancy (OR 1.97, p=0.04) and birthing their most recent child in a birth centre (OR 4.85, p=0.011) when compared with other women.

Discussion

This survey, conducted among a large, nationally-representative sample of pregnant Australian women, found evidence that using yoga during pregnancy was associated with location of practice as well as certain demographic, attitudinal, health and birth environmental characteristics. The findings that women using yoga during pregnancy were more likely to have higher education and live in urban areas, are in line with studies examining yoga use among the general population19 and among patients with chronic diseases.27

Interestingly, using yoga at home—either as the only form of practice or in conjunction with attending yoga classes—was associated with women's perceptions of CAM as affording them more control over their health or body while only attending classes was not associated with this perception of CAM. Compared to some other CAM modalities, using yoga requires a relatively strong initiative and motivation. The belief that yoga enables pregnant women more influence over their well-being touches on the issue of health locus of control.28 29 An individual’s belief about control of health outcomes can be classified as either internal (outcomes depend on the individual’s own behaviour) or external (outcomes depend on the behaviour of other people, fate or luck).30 31 It has been shown that an internal health locus of control is associated with carrying out recommended health behaviour including taking exercise.32 33 Likewise, patients with a strong internal health locus of control have been shown to be more likely to use yoga or meditation to improve their medical condition, while those with a strong external health locus of control are less likely to use yoga.27 34 The findings of our study suggest that this association might mainly apply to those individuals practising yoga at home. It is likely that the health outcomes of attending supervised yoga classes might be perceived to also depend on the behaviour of other people such as the yoga teacher or other class attendants. Thus, restricting the use of yoga to their home might mainly attract women with a strong internal health locus of control while attending yoga classes does not seem to depend on health locus of control. The impact of frequency of yoga practice/class attendance was not examined in this analysis and would benefit from future research attention.

Women attending yoga classes—either as the only form of practice or in conjunction with at-home practice—were more likely to report experiencing sadness or stress, while those only practising at home were not. This is in line with findings from previous research showing people using yoga are more likely to suffer from mental health conditions than those not using yoga, in the general population19 35 and in specific patient populations.27 Yoga has also been shown to improve depression in depressed individuals.36 A number of clinical trials have also demonstrated psychological benefits within the pregnant population: the use of yoga during pregnancy is associated with improvements in perinatal stress, anxiety and depression,37–41 and there is also evidence that yoga use can lead to improved sleep,37 quality of life42 and interpersonal relationships.42 Given these circumstances, it appears more likely that women experiencing sadness and stress during pregnancy may be attracted to undertaking yoga as a means by which to address these negative experiences rather than yoga use during pregnancy causing the stress and sadness. Another explanation for why women attending yoga classes were more likely to experience sadness and stress would be that women using yoga only at home may have integrated the core values of yoga more meaningfully into their daily lives, which may be improving their mental health. This interpretation is in line with our finding that women solely using yoga at home (and not in classes) were the only respondents more likely to perceive CAM as promoting a holistic approach to health.

Similarly, the finding that women using yoga both at home and via yoga classes were less likely to experience repeated vomiting during pregnancy could be interpreted in two ways. Although there is no evidence that yoga can reduce vomiting related to pregnancy, it has been shown that yoga can improve treatment-related vomiting in women suffering from breast cancer.43 44 Thus, pregnancy-related vomiting might also be reduced in women using yoga during pregnancy. However, it has also been shown that women experiencing vomiting during pregnancy are less likely to use any form of exercise,45 and it may be that vomiting could also limit yoga use during pregnancy.

Our analyses revealed that women attending yoga classes as well as practising at home were more likely to actively prepare for labour and birth than women not engaging in both or either of these practices. Moreover, women attending yoga classes and practising at home were also more likely than other women to perceive CAM as offering better prevention than conventional medicine. As such, yoga and other CAM use might be components of wider initiatives via which these women actively prepare for labour. The decision to use yoga as a preparation for labour might be driven by claims that practising yoga postures and breathing techniques during pregnancy improve flexibility and lead to a more calm and relaxed state of mind, resulting in a more satisfying birth.46 These claims are at least partly supported by randomised clinical trials showing that the use of yoga during pregnancy is associated with a decrease in labour pain and duration, and an increase in birthing confidence.47 48

All forms of yoga use (based on location types) were strongly associated with birthing in a birth centre (compared to birthing in a private or public hospital). Midwives hold significant influence over the maternity care provided within a birth centre and they have been shown to generally promote natural childbirth, empowerment of women and holistic care.49 The research indicates that midwives’ support for CAM is exceptionally high.50 It is thus likely that women planning to birth in a birth centre are encouraged by their midwives to use yoga; and this recommendation can be preliminarily regarded as evidence-based. In addition to the benefits to women's perinatal mental health and birth satisfaction, yoga use during pregnancy is associated with improvements in gestational diabetes,51 a reduced incidence of preterm labour, pregnancy-induced hypertension and intrauterine growth retardation,52 53 and amelioration of various pregnancy-related discomforts such as back pain, varicose veins, haemorrhoids and fatigue.48 However, yoga use has also been associated with certain risks such as ligament tears, fractures, neuropathy and even stroke.15 16 These risks should be considered when giving recommendations about yoga use during pregnancy.

The strengths of the reported study include the large nationally-representative sample of pregnant women, a high response rate and the differentiation between different forms of yoga use based on location type. However, the interpretability of the findings is limited by the self-report of the respondents (introducing possibility of recall bias) as well as the specific age range (31–37 years) of the participants. The cross-sectional design limits the interpretation of causal relationships between yoga use, mood and vomiting related to pregnancy. It also limits the ability to consider the role of previous health behaviours (including historical yoga practice) in influencing or characterising use. Our understanding would benefit from future research that investigates the characteristics of yoga users in pregnant women of younger age groups.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that the use of the three different forms of yoga use based on location types is associated with their own demographical, attitudinal, health-related and birth environmental factors. Attitudes towards CAM and pregnancy-related health outcomes seem to be strongly associated with yoga use during pregnancy. Moreover, it seems likely that many pregnant women choose to use yoga due to a recommendation from a midwife. Given that yoga might positively influence pregnancy-related health issues and birth outcomes, but can also be associated with certain risks, it is important that obstetricians and midwives be cognisant of potential yoga use among pregnant women and actively discuss if and where (at home, in class, or both) yoga should be used to help ensure safe, effective maternity care.

Acknowledgments

The research on which this paper is based was conducted as part of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health, The University of Newcastle and The University of Queensland. The authors are grateful to the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing (DOHA) for funding and to the women who provided the survey data.

Footnotes

Contributors: DS, AB and JA designed the study. DS analysed the data. HC, JF and AS interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. All the authors contributed to the editing and writing of the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript.

Funding: This work was supported by Australian Research Council (ARC), Discovery Project Funding (DP1094765).

Competing interests: None declared.

Ethics approval: Ethics committees at the University of Queensland, University of Newcastle and University of Technology Sydney.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Data sharing statement: No additional data are available.

References

  • 1.Adams J, Sibbritt DW, Easthope G et al. The profile of women who consult alternative health practitioners in Australia. Med J Aust 2003;179:297–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Adams J, Lui CW, Sibbritt D et al. Women's use of complementary and alternative medicine during pregnancy: a critical review of the literature. Birth 2009;36:237–45. 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00328.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bishop FL, Lewith GT. Who Uses CAM? A Narrative Review of Demographic Characteristics and Health Factors Associated with CAM Use. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2010;7:11–28. 10.1093/ecam/nen023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Conboy L, Patel S, Kaptchuk TJ et al. Sociodemographic determinants of the utilization of specific types of complementary and alternative medicine: an analysis based on a nationally representative survey sample. J Altern Complement Med 2005;11:977–94. 10.1089/acm.2005.11.977 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Steel A, Adams J, Sibbritt D et al. The influence of complementary and alternative medicine use in pregnancy on labor pain management choices: results from a nationally representative sample of 1,835 women. J Altern Complement Med 2014;20:87–97. 10.1089/acm.2013.0171 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Adams J, Sibbritt D, Lui CW. The use of complementary and alternative medicine during pregnancy: a longitudinal study of Australian women. Birth 2011;38:200–6. 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2011.00480.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hall HG, Griffiths DL, McKenna LG. The use of complementary and alternative medicine by pregnant women: a literature review. Midwifery 2011;27:817–24. 10.1016/j.midw.2010.08.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mitchell M, McClean S. Pregnancy, risk perception and use of complementary and alternative medicine. Health Risk Soc 2014;16:101–16. 10.1080/13698575.2013.867014 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Furlow ML, Patel DA, Sen A et al. Physician and patient attitudes towards complementary and alternative medicine in obstetrics and gynecology. BMC Complement Altern Med 2008;8:35 10.1186/1472-6882-8-35 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hall HR, Jolly K. Women's use of complementary and alternative medicines during pregnancy: a cross-sectional study. Midwifery 2014;30:499–505. 10.1016/j.midw.2013.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Feuerstein G. The yoga tradition. Prescott: Hohm Press, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Iyengar BKS. Light on yoga. New York: Schocken Books, 1966. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.De Michelis E. A history of modern yoga: patanjali and western esotericism. London, UK: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhang Y. American adult yoga practice: preliminary findings from NHIS 2012 data. J Altern Complement Med 2014;20:A122 10.1089/acm.2014.5298.abstract [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cramer H, Krucoff C, Dobos G. Adverse events associated with yoga: a systematic review of published case reports and case series. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e75515 10.1371/journal.pone.0075515 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fishman LM, Saltonstall E, Genis S. Understanding and preventing yoga injuries. Int J Yoga Therap 2009;19:47–54. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cramer H, Ward L, Saper R et al. The safety of yoga: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Epidemiol 2015;182:281–93. 10.1093/aje/kwv071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tilbrook HE, Cox H, Hewitt CE et al. Yoga for chronic low back pain: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2011;155:569–78. 10.7326/0003-4819-155-9-201111010-00003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Birdee GS, Legedza AT, Saper RB et al. Characteristics of yoga users: results of a national survey. J Gen Intern Med 2008;23:1653–8. 10.1007/s11606-008-0735-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Penman S, Cohen M, Stevens P et al. Yoga in Australia: results of a national survey. Int J Yoga 2012;5:92–101. 10.4103/0973-6131.98217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Steel A, Adams J, Sibbritt D et al. Relationship between complementary and alternative medicine use and incidence of adverse birth outcomes: an examination of a nationally representative sample of 1835 Australian women. Midwifery 2014;30:1157–65. 10.1016/j.midw.2014.03.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Collins C. Yoga: intuition, preventive medicine, and treatment. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1998;27:563–8. 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1998.tb02623.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Babbar S, Parks-Savage AC, Chauhan SP. Yoga during pregnancy: a review. Am J Perinatol 2012;29:459–64. 10.1055/s-0032-1304828 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Curtis K, Weinrib A, Katz J. Systematic review of yoga for pregnant women: current status and future directions. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2012;2012:715942 10.1155/2012/715942 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Steel A, Adams J, Sibbritt D et al. Utilisation of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) practitioners within maternity care provision: results from a nationally representative cohort study of 1,835 pregnant women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2012;12:146 10.1186/1471-2393-12-146 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Introduction to logistic regression. London: John Wiley & Sons, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cramer H, Lauche R, Langhorst J et al. Predictors of yoga use among internal medicine patients. BMC Complement Altern Med 2013;13:172 10.1186/1472-6882-13-172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ewart CK, Taylor CB, Reese LB et al. Effects of early postmyocardial infarction exercise testing on self-perception and subsequent physical activity. Am J Cardiol 1983;51:1076–80. 10.1016/0002-9149(83)90348-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rotter JB. Generalized expectancies for internal vs. external control of reinforcement. Psychol Monogr 1966;80:1–28. 10.1037/h0092976 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wallston KA. Control and health. In: Anderson A, ed. Encyclopedia of health & behavior. Vol 1 Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2004:217–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wallston KA. Multidimensional health locus of control scale. In: Christensen AJ, Martin R, Smyth J, eds. Encyclopedia of health psychology. New York: Kluwer/Plenum, 2004:171–2. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Norman P, Bennett P, Smith C et al. Health locus of control and leisure-time exercise. Personal Individ Differ 1997;23:769–74. 10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00106-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Slenker SE, Price JH, O'Connell JK. Health locus of control of joggers and nonexercisers. Percept Mot Skills 1985;61:323–8. 10.2466/pms.1985.61.1.323 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cramer H, Lauche R, Langhorst J et al. Characteristics of patients with internal diseases who use relaxation techniques as a coping strategy. Complement Ther Med 2013;21:481–6. 10.1016/j.ctim.2013.08.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Adams J, Sibbritt D, Lui CW. Health service use among persons with self-reported depression: a longitudinal analysis of 7,164 women. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 2012;26:181–91. 10.1016/j.apnu.2011.10.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cramer H, Lauche R, Langhorst J et al. Yoga for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Depress Anxiety 2013;30:1068–83. 10.1002/da.22166 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Beddoe AE, Lee KA, Weiss SJ et al. Effects of mindful yoga on sleep in pregnant women: a pilot study. Biol Res Nurs 2010;11:363–70. 10.1177/1099800409356320 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Field T, Diego M, Delgado J et al. Yoga and social support reduce prenatal depression, anxiety and cortisol. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2013;17:397–403. 10.1016/j.jbmt.2013.03.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Field T, Diego M, Hernandez-Reif M et al. Yoga and massage therapy reduce prenatal depression and prematurity. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2012;16:204–9. 10.1016/j.jbmt.2011.08.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Newham JJ, Wittkowski A, Hurley J et al. Effects of antenatal yoga on maternal anxiety and depression: a randomized controlled trial. Depress Anxiety 2014;31:631–40. 10.1002/da.22268 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Satyapriya M, Nagendra HR, Nagarathna R et al. Effect of integrated yoga on stress and heart rate variability in pregnant women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009;104:218–22. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.11.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Rakhshani A, Maharana S, Raghuram N et al. Effects of integrated yoga on quality of life and interpersonal relationship of pregnant women. Qual Life Res 2010;19:1447–55. 10.1007/s11136-010-9709-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Raghavendra RM, Nagarathna R, Nagendra HR et al. Effects of an integrated yoga programme on chemotherapy-induced nausea and emesis in breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2007;16:462–74. 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2006.00739.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Vadiraja SH, Rao MR, Nagendra RH et al. , Effects of yoga on symptom management in breast cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Yoga 2009;2:73–9. 10.4103/0973-6131.60048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Foxcroft KF, Rowlands IJ, Byrne NM et al. , BAMBINO group. Exercise in obese pregnant women: the role of social factors, lifestyle and pregnancy symptoms. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2011;11:4 10.1186/1471-2393-11-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Swann S. Active birth yoga https://www.yogababy.com.au/links/articles/active-birth-yoga/
  • 47.Chuntharapat S, Petpichetchian W, Hatthakit U. Yoga during pregnancy: effects on maternal comfort, labor pain and birth outcomes. Complement Ther Clin Pract 2008;14:105–15. 10.1016/j.ctcp.2007.12.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sun YC, Hung YC, Chang Y et al. Effects of a prenatal yoga programme on the discomforts of pregnancy and maternal childbirth self-efficacy in Taiwan. Midwifery 2010;26:e31–6. 10.1016/j.midw.2009.01.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Adams J, Lui CW, Sibbritt D et al. Attitudes and referral practices of maternity care professionals with regard to complementary and alternative medicine: an integrative review. J Adv Nurs 2011;67:472–83. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05510.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ernst E, Watson LK. Midwives’ use of complementary/alternative treatments. Midwifery 2012;28:772–7. 10.1016/j.midw.2011.08.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Youngwanichsetha S, Phumdoung S, Ingkathawornwong T. The effects of mindfulness eating and yoga exercise on blood sugar levels of pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Appl Nurs Res 2014;27:227–30. 10.1016/j.apnr.2014.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Narendran S, Nagarathna R, Gunasheela S et al. Efficacy of yoga in pregnant women with abnormal Doppler study of umbilical and uterine arteries. J Indian Med Assoc 2005;103:12–14, 16–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Narendran S, Nagarathna R, Narendran V et al. Efficacy of yoga on pregnancy outcome. J Altern Complement Med 2005;11:237–44. 10.1089/acm.2005.11.237 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ Open are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES