Skip to main content
American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology logoLink to American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology
. 2015 Feb 6;308(9):H1051–H1064. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00499.2014

Aquaporin-1 facilitates pressure-driven water flow across the aortic endothelium

Tieuvi Nguyen 1,*, Jimmy Toussaint 2,*, Yan Xue 2,3,*, Chirag Raval 1, Limary Cancel 1, Stewart Russell 1, Yixin Shou 2, Omer Sedes 2, Yu Sun 2, Roman Yakobov 2, John M Tarbell 1, Kung-ming Jan 4, David S Rumschitzki 2,3,4,
PMCID: PMC4551120  PMID: 25659484

Abstract

Aquaporin-1, a ubiquitous water channel membrane protein, is a major contributor to cell membrane osmotic water permeability. Arteries are the physiological system where hydrostatic dominates osmotic pressure differences. In the present study, we show that the walls of large conduit arteries constitute the first example where hydrostatic pressure drives aquaporin-1-mediated transcellular/transendothelial flow. We studied cultured aortic endothelial cell monolayers and excised whole aortas of male Sprague-Dawley rats with intact and inhibited aquaporin-1 activity and with normal and knocked down aquaporin-1 expression. We subjected these systems to transmural hydrostatic pressure differences at zero osmotic pressure differences. Impaired aquaporin-1 endothelia consistently showed reduced engineering flow metrics (transendothelial water flux and hydraulic conductivity). In vitro experiments with tracers that only cross the endothelium paracellularly showed that changes in junctional transport cannot explain these reductions. Percent reductions in whole aortic wall hydraulic conductivity with either chemical blocking or knockdown of aquaporin-1 differed at low and high transmural pressures. This observation highlights how aquaporin-1 expression likely directly influences aortic wall mechanics by changing the critical transmural pressure at which its sparse subendothelial intima compresses. Such compression increases transwall flow resistance. Our endothelial and historic erythrocyte membrane aquaporin density estimates were consistent. In conclusion, aquaporin-1 significantly contributes to hydrostatic pressure-driven water transport across aortic endothelial monolayers, both in culture and in whole rat aortas. This transport, and parallel junctional flow, can dilute solutes that entered the wall paracellularly or through endothelial monolayer disruptions. Lower atherogenic precursor solute concentrations may slow their intimal entrainment kinetics.

Keywords: endothelium, aorta, transcellular transport, hydraulic conductivity, tracer transport, bioengineering


abundant aquaporin (AQP)1 is found in numerous mammalian tissues, including vascular endothelial cells (ECs) from human and rat coronary arteries (53), the cornea, lung capillaries, and small vessels, (25, 31, 44), and mouse aortas (52). Swelling studies on single cells (53) and reconstructed liposomes (72) have shown that AQP1 facilitates passive osmotically driven water flows that, unlike pumps, require no ATP. AQP1 allows the passage of certain dissolved gases, e.g., nitric oxide (33), ammonia (43), and CO2 (22, 69). Membrane electrolyte transport induces passive water transport via AQP1. AQP1 suppression in ECs decreases Na+ channels and Na+-K+-ATPase Na+/K+ pump proteins(25). The CFTR, a Cl transporter, and AQP1 often have similar tissue distributions. By interacting with other channels, the CFTR facilitates salt secretion in tissues, which causes passive water transport through AQP1 (31).

There are at least three well-studied systems where AQP1 plays a dominant role in water transport across a cell layer: the kidney, choroid plexus, and peritoneum. In the kidney, AQP1 is abundant in ECs of the outer medullary descending vasa recta microvasculature and in apical and basolateral membranes of the thin descending limb of Henle and proximal tubule. In the proximal tubule, salt is pumped from the lumen, which creates an osmotic gradient that concentrates the urine by extracting water via AQP1. AQP1-null mice cannot concentrate urine as well as wild-type mice (30, 65), whereas spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) have increased AQP1 and produce more concentrated urine than normotensive rats (39).

AQP1 is located in the choroid plexus epithelium cytoplasm and apical membrane. It allows the transfer of cerebrospinal fluid to the brain and plays a role in hydrocephalus. This epithelium has 1/5 the water permeability and half the cerebrospinal fluid pressure in AQP1-null versus wild-type mice; AQP1-null mice do not suffer hydrocephalus. In contrast, SHRs overexpress AQP1 and exhibit accelerated cerebrospinal fluid exchange (45, 64). AQP1 is present in peritoneal capillaries and postcapillary venules, the main barriers to small solute transport in peritoneal dialysis, which involves both diffusive and convective transport. Decreased/increased AQP1 yields decreased/increased water permeability, the latter without altering the osmotic gradient or small-molecule permeability (17). In these, as in other known systems, osmotic gradients are far larger than negligible or nonexistent hydrostatic pressure gradients; thus, osmotic gradients drive AQP1 water transport.

In contrast, in the present study, we investigated the role of AQP1 in hydraulic conductivity (Lp), the ratio of transendothelial water flux (Jv) to hydrostatic pressure difference (ΔP) (63), across cultured aortic endothelial monolayers and excised whole rat aortas with virtually no transmural osmotic differences. Here, we show that AQP1 facilitates water movement driven by large hydrostatic ΔPs found in conduit arteries. Such measurements are more indirect than osmotic cell swelling experiments since they involve EC layers that allow parallel paracellular water transport. To evaluate the contribution of AQP1 to Jv or Lp, we imposed identical ΔPs across whole aortic walls ex vivo or across pairs of identical confluent endothelial monolayers. We compared Lps of endothelia having normal, functioning AQP1 channels with those whose AQP1 channels were chemically blocked or knocked down via small interfering (si)RNA. Tracer experiments demonstrated that the observed Jv differences were not due to changes in paracellular transport; thus, they derive from transcellular, AQP-mediated flow. Our measured Lp changes led to an estimate of EC AQP1 density consistent with erythrocyte AQP1 density from osmotic swelling experiments. Transendothelial flow may have important physiological consequences. In conduit arteries, hydrostatically mediated water flow can affect metabolic access to and paracrine communication between ECs and smooth muscle cells (SMCs). As the sole source of pure water influx, it likely influences transmural solute concentration, which may affect extracellular solute binding kinetics. Rapid AQP1 upregulation by the atheroprotective transcription factor Krüppel-like factor 2 (KLF2) (32) seems to highlight the importance of AQP1 for vascular health.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In Vitro Experiments

Cell culture, monolayer Lp, and tracer permeability.

Cell culture, monolayer Lp, and tracer permeability were performed as previously described in Ref. 11. We prepared bovine aortic EC (BAEC; VEC Technologies, Rensselaer, NY) monolayers on fibronectin-coated Transwell membranes incubated for 10 min in PBS with or without 25 μM HgCl2 and measured (15) Lp of matched monolayer pairs 4–6 days postplating. Luminal (top) and abluminal (bottom) compartments, with the latter connected via a horizontal precision-diameter borosilicate glass tube on a spectrophotometer to a fluid reservoir (15), all at physiological pH, sandwiched the monolayer. A 10-cmH2O hydrostatic pressure differential across the monolayer induced transmural flow, as monitored by spectrophotometer tracking of an air bubble (15) in the glass tube. Match of a nonlinear model of flow-induced EC junction sealing (51) to bubble position versus time data yielded steady monolayer Lp. Leaky monolayers with holes (Lp > 13.3 cm·s−1·mmHg−1) were not considered.

The change in time (Δt) of abluminal fluorescence intensity [calibrated to concentration (ΔCa)] tracked fluorescent solute (added lumenally at t = 0) transport in eight parallel chambers, two of which measured Jv as well (11). The differential 10-cmH2O hydrostatic pressure applied across the monolayer for 2 h was followed by zero ΔP (diffusive) for 1 h. Solute permeability was calculated as follows:

Pe=[(ΔCa/Δt)×Va]/(A×Cp)

where Va is the abluminal chamber fluid volume, A is the filter surface area, and Cp is the luminal chamber fluorophore concentration, assumed time independent and large relative to the abluminal value.

Test for mercury toxicity in monolayers.

HgCl2 reversibly blocks AQP1 water pores (9, 23, 49, 66). To test for toxicity and titrate to a nontoxic HgCl2 level, we exposed monolayers to HgCl2 concentrations (5, 10, 25, 50, 100, and 1,000 μM) for 1 h, washed the samples, added propidium iodide in PBS (1 μg/ml; Invitrogen) to samples, which only penetrates the membranes of dead or dying cells, and viewed samples under a Nikon Eclipse TE2000-E inverted microscope with a ×10 objective.

AQP1 knockdown with siRNA.

Twelve-well filters (Corning 3460) pretreated with fibronectin for 1 h were plated (at 32,000 cells/cm2, passages 4–7) with aortic ECs and cultured in an incubator for 3 days until confluent. We followed Michel's optimized BAEC transfection protocol (27) with either Lipofectamine 2000 (Dharmacon, Lafayette, CO) alone, Lipofectamine 2000 + nontargeting (NT) siRNA, or Lipofectamine 2000 + one or both targets. The optimized concentration per 1.5 × 104 cells was 20 pM siRNA for BAECS and 10 pM siRNA for rat aortic ECs (RAECs) (5, 10, 20, 40, and 80 pM tested, 3 monolayers each). Lp was measured as previously described 2 days posttransfection. Targets (antisense) were as follows: BAEC (Dharmacon), target 1 (T1) 5′-UUCUUCUUGAACUCGCUGGUU-3′ and target 2 (T2) 5′-UACUCCUCCACCUGACCGCUU-3′; and RAEC, AQP1-RSS351945 (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY), 5′-AAGAGCUUCUUCUUGAUUUCGCUGG-3′.

Western blot analysis.

BAECs or RAECs were grown to confluence, lysed with ice-cold RIPA buffer with protease inhibitor cocktails (Roche Diagnostics), and sonicated. Protein was deglycosylated and incubated in sample buffer for 10 min at 60°C to reduce multimer formation. Twenty micrograms of PNGase F-digested (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA) protein were loaded per well, separated on a 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel, transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, blocked, immunoblotted, immunoreactivity visualized (enhanced chemoluminescence kit, Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL), and densitometry probed with ImageJ (National Institutes of Health). Membranes were reprobed with β-actin (42 kDa) antibody as a loading control. We report percent knockdown relative to control. AQP1 blocking peptides (AQP1-P, Alpha Diagnostics, San Antonio, TX), which disrupt antigen-antibody binding, served as an AQP1 antibody blocking control.

RT-PCR.

We extracted RAEC RNA in the presence of RNase inhibitor, synthesized cDNA, performed PCR, separated PCR products, and detected with ultraviolet light. Quantitative RT-PCR amplification was done on 25-μl mixtures of 2× SYBR green fluorescein mix (Thermo Fisher), 70 nM primers, and 250 ng cDNA templates. An initial 5-min 95°C denaturation preceded fifty 30-s cycles at 94, 55, and 78°C. A negative nontemplate control was used. A dissociation curve analysis assessed product amplification specificity after each PCR. Target gene/primer sequence pairs were as follows: AQP1 (18), NM-012778 [forward (125–144): 5′-CCCTCTTCGTCTTCATCAGC-3′ and reverse (543–562): 5′-CTGAGCCACCTAAGTCTCGG-3′]; von Willebrand factor, XM-342759 [forward (4296–4316): 5′-GCAGTCAGTTGGCCTCTACCA-3′ and reverse (4366–4346): 5′-ACGGTCAATTTTGCCAAAGATC-3′]; GAPDH, NM_017008 [forward (372–390): 5′-TCTTCACCACCATGGAGAA-3′ and reverse (603–585): 5′-ACTGTGGTCATGAGCCCTT-3′ (54)]; and smoothelin, NM_001013049.2 [forward: 5′-TCGGAGTGCTGGTGAATAC-3′ and reverse: 5′-CCCTGTTTCTCTTCCTCTGG-3′ (50)].

Ex Vivo Lp(ΔP) Measurements

All animal protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

The aortas of male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats (350–400 g) on a normal diet were removed under transmural ΔP, flushed with a perfusate solution [4% (wt/vol) BSA in PBS with 10−3 M NaNO3 and 0.03% trypan blue (vital stain and leak reporter)], and submerged in a petri dish with the same solution minus trypan blue (which has a negligible effect on its osmotic pressure) as previously described in Ref. 55. The proximal end of the aorta was connected to reservoir 2 (Fig. 1; valves not shown) via a spectrophotometer bubble tracking system adapted from Ref. 15 that was identical to the in vitro Lp system described above. A distal cannulata connected it to a perfusate solution and pressure reservoirs whose pressure was adjusted by a mercury sphygmomanometer pump. Preconditioning (lowering and raising vessel ΔP to its minimal and maximal physiological ΔP three times, each for <1 min) reduced hysteresis.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Setup for hydraulic conductivity (Lp) measurements of the rat aorta ex vivo before and after administration of inhibitory agent (valves not shown). Setup is a modification of that in Ref. 55. Mercury sphygmomanometers control pressures in pressure reservoir bottles. Solution reservoirs A and D contain perfusate solution, including trypan blue. Reservoir C contains perfusate with the active agent HgCl2 when used. Reservoir B is for fluid uptake. The text explains in detail how one measures Lp[pressure difference (ΔP)] before, then after a flush with HgCl2, and again after endothelial denudation, all at the same three ΔPs and all on each vessel.

Transmural flux measurements.

After pumping reservoir D to the desired ΔP, we opened the proximal valve. The bubble tracking device measured the flow rate of fluid entering the vessel and exiting its walls. We only used data steady for >30 min. A mechanical caliper accurate to ±0.1 mm (55) measured vessel geometry before and 6 and 30 min after pressurization to track myogenic changes. We repeated this procedure for each ΔP. Next, to block AQP channels, a ∼5-mmHg ΔP drove the HgCl2 solution from reservoir C through the vessel for 10 min. We flushed for 10 min and remeasured Lp(ΔP). To deendothelialize the vessel, we opened the proximal tie, inserted a 3- or 4-mm Foley catheter with a small Epon ball on its tip, advanced it to the distal end, and removed it with a slow rotation. After a 5-min flush at 10 mmHg from reservoir A, we retied the proximal cannula and remeasured Lp(ΔP). All three Lp(ΔP) sets were taken on every vessel.

Controls for technique, mercury toxicity, and effect on SMCs.

We measured Lp at three ΔPs, flushed with a blank solution, and remeasured Lp at the same ΔPs. A flush driven by a ≤5-mmHg ΔP left Lp unchanged at all ΔPs. To titrate for nontoxic HgCl2 levels, we measured Lp at two ΔPs, tried an HgCl2 exposure (concentration and time), remeasured Lp(ΔP), flushed with 2 μM 2-mercaptoethanol for 10 min to reduce the Cys-Hg2+ bond (23), and remeasured Lp(ΔP). Since Hg2+ blocks AQPs, it should either decrease Lp (if there is transcellular transport) or leave Lp unchanged; an Lp increase at any ΔP indicates cellular or junctional toxicity. We found a maximum HgCl2 exposure that decreased Lp at all ΔPs. If 2-mercaptoethanol then returned Lp to baseline for all ΔPs, we concluded that Hg2+ caused no endothelial toxicity. To test if blockade of SMC AQPs affected medial Lp, we denuded samples, measured Lp(ΔP), exposed samples to Hg2+, and remeasured Lp(ΔP).

Electron microscopy.

Two male SD rats (8 rats total) were used for 50 and 100 mmHg with and without HgCl2 treatment. A carotid artery cannulation connected the anesthetized, ventilated rat to a constant pressure reservoir. After the heart was stopped, a heparin-PBS rinse from the carotid artery to the femoral artery ran until the effluent was clear. Next came a 5 μM HgCl2-PBS or pure PBS flush at ΔP for 10–15 min and glutaraldehyde-PBS at the same ΔP for 2 h (in situ fixation). The aorta was removed, placed in glutaraldehyde for 24–48 h with osmium tetroxide, embedded in resin, sectioned to 900Å (gold reflection) with a diamond knife in an LKB Ultramicrotome 4801A, stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and viewed with a transmission electron microscope (Zeiss Electron Microscope 902).

Immunochemistry

Monolayers.

The monolayer protocol used was similar to that previously described in Ref. 68. Briefly, confluent BAEC monolayers grown on Transwell filters were fixed with PLP fixative, permeabilized with 0.075% saponin-PBS, and blocked with 15% goat serum, 0.3% Triton X-100, 20 mM sodium phosphate, and 0.9 mM NaCl. After exposure to rabbit anti-rat AQP1 primary antibody (Alpha Diagnostics; 1:250 dilution) in 15% goat serum, 0.2% BSA, and PBS and then to secondary antibody (Alexa 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG, Molecular Probes, Carlsbad, CA; 1:200) in 1% goat serum and PBS, samples were counterstained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; 1:3,000), cut, mounted with Vectashield, and viewed under a Zeiss 510 confocal microscope with same laser intensity/exposure time for all samples.

Vessel sections.

Ventilated 250–300 g male SD rats were euthanized and perfused with 0.3 ml heparin (5,000 USP units/ml, China Chemical & Pharmaceutical, Taipei, China) in 60 ml PBS from the carotid cannula to the femoral artery until the effluent was clear followed by Accusan Bouin's fixative (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO). The aorta was removed, further fixed in Bouin's fixative, and stripped of adventitia and connective tissue. The aorta was then cut into segments, washed in 70% alcohol plus several drops of NaOH, placed in 30% sucrose overnight at 4°C, and embedded in Tissue Tech OCT compound (Tissue-Tek, Sakura Finetek, Torrance, CA). Afterward, the aorta was cryostat (Microtome Cryostat Cryostar HM 560 MV) sectioned to 10 μm onto Superfrost Plus slides (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) and stained with hematoxylin (48) with or without Slow Fade Gold antifade with DAPI (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Pontamine Sky Blue 6BX (0.5%; Alpha Aesar, Haverhill, MA) restricted elastic's broad-spectrum autofluorescence to red (13). Immunochemistry was done as in culture except that 0.05% saponin was added to the blocker, the primary antiserum was in 3% goat serum, 0.2% BSA, and PBS (1:500) for 18–24 h, and secondary antibody was diluted to 1:50. Samples were mounted with Vectashield media (clear nail polish secured the coverslips) and viewed under a Leica TCS SP2 AOBS confocal microscope with Leica TCS SP/NT 2.5 version 2.51347d image-analysis software or a Zeiss LSM510 confocal microscope with LSM 3.5 SP 1.1 software.

Calculations

Lp was determined using the following equation:

Lp=vA/(ΔP×π×OD×L)

where v is the bubble front meniscus velocity, A is the tubing cross-sectional area, OD is the average outer diameter, and L is the length. π × OD × L is the vessel outer surface area.

Osmotic gradients across large vessel walls are generally assumed negligible. Thus, Lp of the intact entire vessel wall (Lpt; Fig. 2A) can be related to that of the denuded vessel [media + internal elastic lamina (IEL); Lpm + I] and endothelium + subendothelial intima (SI) (Lpe + i) by the sum of specific resistances (1/Lp) (63) as follows:

1Lpt=1Lpe+i+1Lpm+1 (1)

Vessel Lp experiments measured three sets of Lps on each vessel (intact, after HgCl2 AQP1 blocker, and denuded), each at the same three ΔPs. Equation 1 gives, for each vessel, the derived quantity, Lpe + i, without blocker [equal to (1/Lpt without blocker − 1/Lpm + I denuded)−1] and with blocker [equal to (1/Lpt with blocker − 1/Lpm + I denuded)−1] and their percent difference, with mean ± SE for all three.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

A: breakdown of Lps of artery wall layers. A: cartoon of the artery wall depicting the endothelium, subendothelial intima (SI), internal elastic laminar (IEL), and media. It shows a compressed SI with an endothelial cell (EC) blocking an IEL fenestra. Equation 1 breaks up the total wall resistance, 1/Lpt, into the sum of the resistances of its two sublayers, endothelium + SI (1/Lpe + i) and IEL + media (1/Lpm + i), in series. Equation 2 (appendix) breaks up 1/Lpe + i into endothelial (1/Lpe) plus SI + fenestrae (1/Lpi + f) resistances in series. SI flow resistance is due to the SI extracellular matrix. Fenestral resistance is due to flow alteration in the SI caused by EC blocking the fenestral entrance. B: model for possible change in junction width (h) with treatment. It is a detail of the junction in A, depicting two parallel pathways for transport, paracellular (junctional) and transcellular [via aquaporin (AQP)1 (hourglasses)]. We modeled a treatment that complicates junctions by a change in h of the narrow part of the junction open for transport from h0 (solid) to h1 (dashed). Since the junction area ∼h × total junction length and since h ⪡ cell radius, the ratio of h1/h0 of slit widths represents the post-to-pretreatment ratio of cross-sectional areas for transport. The right portion of B depicts the model (appendix) for junctional transport (Lpj) in parallel with AQP1-mediated transcellular transport (LpEC). LpEC results from AQP1 water channels in a series/parallel arrangement in the cell: n membrane layers in series; ni AQP1s in parallel in membrane layer i (i = 1, . . ., m).

Statistics

Values are presented as means ± SE. We calculate P values from unpaired (paired1) Student's t-tests for two columns of unpaired (paired) data and from ANOVA (with subsequent Tukey tests when appropriate) for multiple data columns. P values of <0.05 were considered significant. For more complex comparisons of two types of experiments that measured similar information, we used bootstrap (14, 21) nonparametric methods, which are detailed in the appendix.

RESULTS

Figure 3A shows a confocal section of immunocytochemically and DAPI-treated BAECs grown to confluence on a Transwell filter with xz and yz views; Fig. 3B shows the three-dimensional reconstruction. The isotype control (not shown) was nearly black. Blue (DAPI) stain indicates cell nuclei. Green (Alexa 488) stain indicates that BAECs avidly express AQP1 in some cultured cells, including around the nuclei and far from the perinuclear region. Fig. 3C shows a 200-nm confocal optical slice from a 10-μm transverse section of an SHR thoracic aorta. The result for a normotensive SD rat (not shown) was similar. Here, green again indicates AQP1, since we restricted tissue autofluorescence to red, as described above. The top red band is the IEL. DAPI (blue) labeled EC (SMC) nuclei above (below) the IEL, establishing AQP1 expression in both cell types in conduit arteries, as previously described for SMCs (53). To verify that all tissue autofluorescence was pushed into red, we performed the procedure without either antibody. To test for nonspecific primary antibody binding, we did a small peptide control to the primary antibody's AQP1-binding site (Fig. 3D). To test for nonspecific secondary antibody binding, we used secondary antibody but no primary antibody. All three controls showed red bands but no visible green fluorescence.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

APQ1 expression in aortic ECs. A–C: Zeiss LSM510 (A–C) confocal images and three-dimensional reconstruction (B) of a confluent bovine aortic EC (BAEC) monolayer on a Transwell filter. Green (Alexa 488) staining indicates AQP1; blue [4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)] staining indicates the nucleus. AQP1 stains some cells more intensely than others. xz and yz views show AQP1 expressed around the nucleus as well as away from it. C: transverse 200-nm optical confocal section of a spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) thoracic aorta; the analogous image (not shown) for a normotensive Sprague-Dawley (SD) rat was similar. Black on top, lumen; top red line, IEL. ECs are between the lumen and IEL. Blue DAPI stained EC above the IEL and smooth muscle cell (SMC) nuclei below the IEL. Intense green staining of ECs and SMCs indicates AQP1. D: small peptide control (red and green channels) showed no visible green. Elastin autofluorescence was restricted to red. E: overlayed image of 50 serial 200-nm optical (Leica: D and E) confocal sections (no DAPI) from a 10-μm cryostat section on the black-and-white transmission image. A computer-generated outline tightly surrounds the region of intense green. The near coincidence of outline and EC border in the transmission image verifies that AQP1 is expressed in cell luminal and abluminal membranes and likely in its cytoplasm.

For a transcellular AQP water transport pathway, it is necessary (but not sufficient) that AQP1 be present both on the luminal and abluminal parts of the cell membrane. Fig. 3E shows the superposition of 50 serial, high-magnification 200-nm optical confocal slices through an EC from a 10-μm transverse section of an SHR [normotensive SD (not shown) similar] thoracic aorta. Our custom software creates a blue outline (tracing the maximum gradient in green intensity) to surround the region of intense, albeit uneven, green stain above the IEL. Superimposed on the confocal image is the black-and-white transmission image, blurry at high magnification. The near coincidence between the transmission image cell border and the blue outline of the green region indicates that AQP1 fluorescence extends to and includes both EC luminal and abluminal membranes. This bilateral distribution makes plausible transcellular trans-AQP1 water transport.

This plausibility motivated functional water transport experiments. We subjected matched (i.e., treated exactly the same) pairs of BAEC monolayers cultured on fibronectin-coated Transwell filters (15), one with and one without 25 μM HgCl2, an AQP blocker (49), to a 10-cmH2O hydrostatic ΔP and measured Jv across the monolayer versus time (15). This ΔP induces a Jv similar to that in large arteries in vivo. Hg2+ blocks AQP1 water transport by binding to Cys189 at AQP1’s pore entrance (49) but can be cytotoxic above certain concentrations/exposure times. Propidium iodide staining, which only penetrates the membranes of dead/dying cells (i.e., toxicity), was only present at HgCl2 concentrations above 50 μM; 25 μM yielded no evidence of toxicity. Human intestinal Caco-2 cells exposed to 100 μM Hg2+ showed no diminution in cell viability (1). Twenty-five micromolars is 1/40 the concentration used to block AQP1s in vascular SMCs (53) but is enough to block ∼90% of AQP1 in murine erythrocytes (70). In each matched pair of monolayers, Lp was significantly lower (22 ± 6%, n = 4 monolayer pairs, percent drops: 16.0%, 18.4%, 24.1%, and 29.9%, P = 0.0057; Table 1) in monolayers exposed to HgCl2; toxicity would have caused it to rise.

Table 1.

HgCl2 effects on BAEC Lp and TAMRA P0

Control
HgCl2
BAEC Parameter\Treatment μ ± SE n μ ± SE n P Value (by t-Test)
Lp, ×107 cm·s−1·mmHg−1 7.75 ± 0.80 4 6.09 ± 0.71 4 0.0057, paired
TAMRA
    P0, ×105 cm/s 1.47 ± 0.18 8 1.22 ± 0.17 8 0.69
    Pc, ×105 cm/s 1.72 ± 0.42 8 1.52 ± 0.24 8 0.34
Dextran
    P0, ×106 cm/s 2.01 ± 0.34 8 1.67 ± 0.43 8 0.77
    Pc, × 106 cm/s 3.30 ± 0.46 8 3.60 ± 0.90 8 0.55
BAEC Statistical Test Metric
Post-to-pre-HgCl2 treatment Lp ratios versus TAMRA P0 ratios 0.004 (P value by t-test)
Bootstrap distribution on derived statistic (where a negative mean indicates a significant difference) for TAMRA data (Fig. 7B) 99% probability that μ < −0.050

BAEC, bovine aortic endothelial cell; Lp, hydraulic conductivity; P0, diffusive permeability; Pc, convective permeability.

To test if HgCl2 treatment affected monolayer integrity, as reflected in paracellular transport, we performed 70-kDa dextran [∼7-nm radius (19)] solvent drag experiments. HgCl2 altered neither its diffusive permeability (P0) nor convective permeability (Pc) significantly (Table 1; note the large SE for Pc); thus, HgCl2 did not harm monolayer barrier function. Since 70-kDa dextran only crosses the monolayer paracellularly, its nonsignificant P0 change indicates that the observed Lp drop is not likely due to junctional (paracellular) changes. We also performed solvent drag experiments with TAMRA, a smaller tracer (0.8-nm radius) that also only crosses the monolayer paracellularly2. As shown in Table 1, TAMRA P0 = Pc, neither of which changed significantly with HgCl2. P0 = Pc means that the diffusive far exceeds the advective contribution to its transport, which implies (appendix) that the ratio of control-to-treated P0s equals the ratio of control-to-treated junction pore widths. If all transport were paracellular (and Darcy; the appendix gives the Poiseuille alternative), this ratio of pore widths would also equal the ratio of control-to-treated Lps (Fig. 2B). Since HgCl2 caused a significant 22% drop in Lp with a statistically insignificant, yet ∼17%, change in P0, we used statistical tests to see how unlikely the Lp drop is due to paracellular, i.e., pore width changes. A t-test showed that the sets of ratios3 of P0s and Lps were indeed different (P = 0.004; Table 1), i.e., arose from different distributions. A further check is that of nonparametric bootstrap (14, 21) statistic S (appendix), which is zero if all water transport is paracellular and negative if there is nonparacellular water transport that decreases upon HgCl2 exposure. With 99% probability, S had mean < −0.05 (see Fig. 7B). Both tests indicated that HgCl2-induced pore width (or P0) changes are very unlikely to explain the drop in Lp with HgCl2: thus, water transport is very unlikely purely paracellular. The siRNA results described below make an even stronger argument for the same conclusion.

Since HgCl2 blocking is nonspecific, we validated these results with siRNAs against bovine AQP1 mRNA on BAEC monolayers (27). Western blots (Fig. 4A) and densitometry demonstrated that T2 induced 70.3% (n = 4, P < 0.001) AQP1 (28 kDa + 56 kDa) knockdown relative to the 42-kDa β-actin control. Lps for BAEC monolayers judged nonleaky showed a 53% (P = 0.04) drop in Lp (7.94 ± 1.90 vs. 3.73 ± 0.56, each × 10−7 cm·s−1·mmHg−1, n = 6) from scrambled NT siRNA in pooled data from T2 alone and 20 pM each of T1 + T2-treated monolayers; T1 had no effect on Lp. We repeated these experiments on RAECs to compare with rat aorta experiments.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Small interfering (si)RNA results. A: BAECs. Western blots (28-kDa monomer and 56-kDa dimer bands, n = 4) show knockdown versus control at optimized 20 nM siRNA2 relative to the vector β-actin (42 kDa) control. Relevant lanes were cut from a larger gel. Densitometry showed 70.3% knockdown (P < 0.0005) using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health). B: rat aortic ECs (RAECs). Western blots (56-kDa dimer band) with rat-specific AQP1 siRNA are shown. Lane 1, control without siRNA; lane 2, control with Lipofectamine 2000 but no siRNA; lanes 3 and 4, duplicates of 20 pmol siRNA; lanes 5 and 6, duplicates of 10 pmol siRNA. For 10 pmol, the AQP1 dimer band dropped 67.9% (P = 0.001) and the combined monomer + dimer bands dropped 59.2% (P = 0.00084), normalized by the β-actin control.

Analogous siRNA knockdown experiments for RAEC monolayers gave similar results. Western blots showed a 67.9% drop in the 56-kDa AQP1 dimer band (n = 2, P = 0.001; Fig. 4B) and a smaller change in the 28-kDa monomer band for a 59.2% drop (n = 2, P = 0.00084) in the 28-kDa + 56-kDa bands relative to the β-actin control. Higher multimer bands showed no significant change. Quantitative RT-PCR, given as 2−ΔΔCT (where CT is threshold cycle), normalized to endogenous control (GAPDH) relative to untreated control, showed a 0.47 (+0.28/−0.18)4-fold change of AQP1 relative to control, i.e., a ∼53% siRNA-induced drop in AQP1 mRNA (n = 3). Treated and control groups showed no drop [2−ΔΔCT = 0.98 (+0.11/−0.10)] for von Willebrand factor (n = 3). Corresponding to AQP1 knockdown, we found a 56.4% (n = 7) reduction in mean monolayer Lp for this target siRNA (Table 2). Lp for no treatment, Lipofectamine 2000 alone, and Lipofectamine 2000 + NT siRNA (not shown) were nearly identical. Table 2 shows albumin (radius: 3.5 nm) and TAMRA solute drag results on control versus knocked down RAEC monolayers. The larger molecule, here albumin, had P0Pc5. As with HgCl2/BAECs, P0 (barrier function) was unaffected by siRNA (two-tailed t-test). The smaller molecule, TAMRA, had PcP0 for both treated and control monolayers, i.e., diffusive dominated advective TAMRA transport, with neither Pc nor P0 affected by siRNA. Insignificant (−0.7%, 16.7%) solute tracer P0 differences were far too small to explain the 56.4% siRNA-induced Lp drop. This indicates transcellular water flow. A t-test showed that post-to-pretreatment ratios of Lps and TAMRA P0s were different (P = 4.0 × 10−8; Table 2): they came from different distributions. The mean of the bootstrap statistic was less than −0.52 ⪡ 0 with 99% confidence (see Fig. 7A). Thus, with extremely high confidence, Lp has both paracellular and nonparacellular contributions and siRNA AQP1 knockdown reduced the latter significantly in RAEC monolayers.

Table 2.

si RNA inhibition of RAEC Lp and TAMRA P0

Control
siRNA
RAEC Parameter\Treatment μ ± SE n μ ± SE n P Value (One Tail/Two Tails)
Lp, ×107 cm·s−1·mmHg−1 6.84 ± 0.27 8 2.98 ± 0.27 7 1.85 × 10−7
TAMRA
    P0, ×105 cm/s 1.09 ± 0.11 8 1.17 ± 0.13 8 0.35
    Pc, ×105 cm/s 1.39 ± 0.12 8 1.25 ± 0.07 8 0.65
Albumin
    P0, ×106 cm/s 2.04 ± 0.40 13 1.70 ± 0.39 13 0.033/0.065
    Pc, ×106 cm/s 3.74 ± 0.78 9 2.76 ± 0.73 9 0.0036/0.0072
RAEC Statistical Test Metric
Post-to-pre-siRNA treatment ratios of Lp versus ratios of TAMRA P0 4.0 × 10−8 (P value by t-test)
Bootstrap distribution on derived statistic (where a negative value indicates a significant difference; Fig. 7A) 99% probability that μ < −0.52

RAEC, rat aortic endothelial cell; siRNA, small interfering RNA.

To assess AQP1’s contribution to whole vessel Lp, we measured Lp on each aorta at three ΔPs (as in Refs. 4 and 63) multiple times after various treatments. We first carried out controls to validate our technique and to assess toxicity. The results shown in Table 3 demonstrate that a flush driving ΔP of 5 mmHg left Lp unchanged. The results shown in Table 4 demonstrate that a 10-min flush of 5 μM HgCl2 [which gives ∼40% osmotic permeability inhibition in erythrocytes (70)] followed by a 10-min wash to remove unbound Hg2+ lowered Lp at all ΔPs. 2-Mercaptoethanol returned Lp to baseline at all three ΔPs. [Note that the drop in Lp with HgCl2 was larger at 60 mmHg (24%) and 45 mmHg (31% and 38%) than at 100 mmHg (7%, 18%, and 17%)]. Electron micrographs of control and HgCl2-treated rat aortas fixed at 50 and 100 mmHg showed no EC morphological changes (Fig. 5). These Lp experiments and micrographs indicate that the 10-min 5 μM HgCl2 exposure was not EC toxic.

Table 3.

Control Lp experiments for technique

Pressure, mmHg Baseline Lp, ×108 cm·s−1·mmHg−1 Flushed Lp, ×108 cm·s−1·mmHg−1 Average Percent Change in Lp After Blockade
60 2.93 ± 0.21 2.99 ± 0.15 2.12% ± 2.11%
100 2.51 ± 0.44 2.50 ± 0.46 −0.68% ± 03.09%
140 2.88 ± 0.48 3.00 ± 0.49 3.95% ± 1.47%

n = 3. The control was a flush with blank solution.

Table 4.

Control Lp experiments for mercury toxicity

Pressure, mmHg Baseline Lp, ×108 cm·s−1·mmHg−1 HgCl2 Flushed Lp, ×108 cm·s−1·mmHg−1 Lp After 2-Mercaptoethanol, ×108 cm·s−1·mmHg−1
Rat 1
60 2.67 2.02 2.48
100 2.47 2.30 2.40
Rat 2
45 1.98 1.37 2.07
100 1.76 1.44 1.89
Rat 3
45 2.03 1.26 1.98
100 1.76 1.48 1.68

The control was a flush with HgCl2; Cys-Hg2+ was then reduced with 2-mercaptoethanol.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Electron micrographs of rat aortas fixed under pressure at 50 and 100 mmHg with and without HgCl2 treatment. Images show that HgCl2 treatment of rat aortas at dosages and times described in the text caused no visible morphological changes in RAECs in whole vessels. A and B: untreated (A) and treated (B) rat aortas fixed at 50 mmHg; C and D: untreated (C) and treated (D) rat aortas fixed at 100 mmHg.

The results shown in Fig. 3C confirm the well-known (53) fact that vascular SMCs express AQP1. To exclude the possibility that blockade of SMC AQPs caused the observed vessel wall Lpt changes, we denuded the aortic endothelium, measured baseline Lp(ΔP), flushed with HgCl2, and remeasured Lp(ΔP). The results shown in Table 5 demonstrate that there were no significant Lp changes due to flushing a partially, fully (later with no modifier), or vigorously denuded (vigorous working of the catheter back and forth may affect the IEL) vessel with HgCl2. Thus, blockade of SMC AQPs did not measurably decrease vessel wall Lpt. Lps of denuded SD rat aortas (Fig. 6A) treated with HgCl2 before denudation were similar to Lps of denuded aortas both before and after HgCl2 treatment (Table 5) and to Lps of denuded Wistar-Kyoto rat aortas (n = 5, not shown) of the same age/weight not exposed to HgCl2.

Table 5.

Control Lp experiments for smooth muscle cell AQP1 blockade on the whole rat aorta

Description Pressure, mmHg Baseline Denuded Lp, ×108 cm·s−1·mmHg−1 Denudation Followed by HgCl2 Flush Lp, ×108 cm·s−1·mmHg−1
Rat 1
Incomplete denudation 60 2.26 2.29
100 2.62 2.70
Rat 2
Complete denudation 60 3.87 3.97
100 3.73 3.40
140 3.55 3.67
Rat 3
Vigorous denudation 60 4.93 5.34
100 5.21 5.45

AQP1, aquaporin 1.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Lp of the rat aorta ex vivo. Figure 1 shows the experimental setup. A: Lp(ΔP) for an excised aorta from 300- to 350-g male SD rats, first without (bold solid) and then with (dashed) the AQP blocker HgCl2, and then after endothelial denudation (thin solid), with all nine Lp values taken on each vessel. HgCl2 reduced every vessel's Lp significantly at every pressure. B: replot of these data as means ± SE of the percent drop in Lpt with HgCl2 versus ΔP. HgCl2 reduced Lpt (32 ± 4%) at 60 mmHg and less [yet significantly different (P = 0.000026) and nonzero] at 100 (11 ± 2%) and 140 mmHg (5 ± 3%). C: since HgCl2 does not change Lpm + I (Table 5), changes in Lpt reflect changes in endothelium + SI Lpe + i (points); numbers above the points are means ± SE of percent drops in Lpe + i with HgCl2. These differences are distinguishable (P < 0.005) for 60 mmHg versus the other pressures only. (This figure and these statistics neglect the lone outlier that showed nearly no difference between Lpt and Lpm + I, and thus a huge Lpe + i, at 60mmHg only; the mean ± SE for the percent drop including this outlier at 60 mmHg was 56 ± 7.4%). Lpe + i dropped by more than half at 60 mmHg. n = 6.

Figure 6A shows Lpt at ΔP = 60, 100, and 140 mmHg at baseline and after HgCl2 and Lpm + I after denudation, with all nine measurements taken on each vessel (n = 6). Each intact vessel Lpt dropped at every ΔP with HgCl2. Figure 6B shows a plot of mean ± SE values of the percent Lpt drop of a vessel with HgCl2 versus ΔP, which brings this out. At 60 mmHg, HgCl2 decreases intact vessel Lpt by 32 ± 4% and less at ΔP ≥ 100 mmHg, as also seen in the controls in Table 4. Equation 1 (63) relates the apparent resistance, 1/Lpe + i, of the endothelium + SI to Lpt and Lpm + I (Fig. 6A). HgCl2 increased the average endothelium + SI fraction, [(1/Lpe + i)/(1/Lpt)], of the total wall resistance from 26 ± 8% to 56 ± 5% at 60 mmHg. Since HgCl2 does not affect medial resistance, it increased this fraction by decreasing Lpe + i 51 ± 2.3% (average percent difference, not the percentage of average difference, since all measurements were done on each vessel) from 6.28 to 3.13 × 10−8 cm·s−1·mmHg−1 [n = 5; with one outlier (n = 6), the drop was 58 ± 2%] at 60 mmHg (Fig. 6C). If these percent changes simply represented a decrease in native endothelial Lpe, they would be ΔP independent. The data evinced smaller, yet significant (P < 0.05), percent drops in Lpe + i and Lpt at the higher ΔPs: 21 ± 4% and 11 ± 2% at 100 mmHg and 11 ± 7% and 5 ± 3% at 140 mmHg. ANOVA on the curves shown in Fig. 6, A and C, demonstrated that the flushed (A and C) and denuded (A) curves were flat, i.e., ΔP independent (P > 0.05), but that baseline Lpe + i (neglecting one outlier) and Lpt at 60 mmHg differed (P < 0.05 by ANOVA) from their (indistinguishable) values at 100 and 140 mmHg. Lpt (n = 2, not shown) with HgCl2 showed that lowering ΔP from 60 to 20 mmHg raised Lpt by 17.4 ± 8.6%.

DISCUSSION

Immunochemistry demonstrated that cultured aortic ECs and RAECs in whole aortas express AQP1 (Fig. 3). Expression levels varied far more in culture than in vessels, likely due to the nonphysiological ΔP = 0 and high protein culture medium for growth to confluence. Quiescent cells likely also express differently from recently proliferative cells. The near coincidence of the transmission image's EC border and outline of the green (AQP1) region in the superposition of serial confocal sections (Fig. 3E) establishes AQP1 expression throughout whole aorta ECs, including luminal and abluminal membranes; thus, AQP1-mediated transcellular water flow is plausible.

In Vitro Experiments

Lp experiments on AQP1 knocked down BAEC and RAEC monolayers (Table 2), confirmed by Western blots and RT-PCR, and on BAEC monolayers with HgCl2-blocked AQPs (Table 1) showed that reducing functioning EC AQP1 significantly reduced monolayer Lp.6 The reduction was larger for siRNA than for HgCl2, likely because HgCl2 concentrations used to avoid toxicity probably reduced AQP function less than siRNA.

HgCl2 did not significantly affect monolayer 70-kDa dextran P0; this verified monolayer integrity. Since 70-kDa dextran only crosses the endothelium paracellularly, the unchanged P0 indicates unchanged junctional transport: the Lp drop was not due to junction strand changes or to junctional changes from cell swelling (5, 6), possibly secondary to Hg2+ blockade of AQPs (65). TAMRA is a tracer large enough to only pass through the large junction pores for water (28), yet small enough that, even with a 10-cmH2O ΔP-driven flow across the monolayer, the diffusive far exceeds the advective contribution to its transport (P0Pc). Challenging matched pairs of control versus HgCl2-blocked BAEC monolayers with TAMRA showed that changes in P0 do not explain the observed Lp drops with HgCl2. Similar tracer and Lp experiments on AQP1-knocked down RAEC monolayers confirmed this more strongly; they clearly indicated (>>99% confidence) that AQP1-mediated transcellular water transport represents a significant fraction of Lpe.

Gao et al. (25) added anti-AQP1 siRNA, transfection reagents, and 10-kDa dextran (radius: ∼3 nm, between TAMRA and 70-kDa dextran) together to cultured human pulmonary vasculature EC monolayers. They found that total tracer diffused across the layer doubled over the ensuing 24 h in the presence of reagents that affect EC membranes and junctions while knockdown and other dynamic changes occurred. Our study, on different cells, found a decrease in the instantaneous, i.e., 1 h, permeability of an already-knocked down, nonzero ΔP-adjusted monolayer in physiological media. It is impossible to compare these vastly different experiments.

Whole Vessel Experiments

We use rat, rather than the much smaller AQP1 knockout mouse, aortas because adequate Lp technique signal/noise requires a minimum endothelial area and transendothelial flow. The thin lubricating layer surrounding a tracked bubble that moves too slowly can break; the bubble then sticks to the tube wall (26, 46), which compromises the measurement.

The HgCl2 concentration [which only negligibly inhibits ion transporters (37)] in our intact aorta study is lower than in our BAEC experiments, yet more effectively inhibits endothelial Lp. This is likely because, as noted, fewer ECs in culture express AQP1 as strongly as in vessels. Different conditions can yield different EC AQP1 functions and localization, e.g., AQP1 in rat choroid plexus epithelial cells mainly localizes in the apical cell membrane but shifts to the cytoplasm in cells of rats with increased choroid plexus pressure (hydrocephalus). A PKC mechanism (45) causes ΔP-induced AQP1 shuttling. Fluid shear at 1 dyn/cm2 causes AQP2 translocation to the renal epithelial cell membrane (38), where it participates in transcellular flow (10). Doubling the perfusion rates in isolated renal microtubules for 15 min doubles AQP1 in the brush-border apical and basolateral membranes (47). Quiescent ECs exposed to large ΔP and shear, as in whole vessels but not in our monolayers, have tighter cadherin junctions and greater plasma membrane AQP1 content (42), i.e., lower junctional and higher transcellular flow: AQPs account for a larger share of transendothelial flow; thus, AQP blockade decreases Lp more in vessels than in culture.

HgCl2 blockade of EC AQP1 reduces whole rat aortic wall Lpt ex vivo by 32 ± 4% at 60 mmHg. HgCl2 exposures cause no significant cytotoxicity; no morphological changes appear, and removal of Hg2+ with 2ME returns Lpt to control values. HgCl2 does not change denuded vessel Lpm + I (Table 5). Thus, Lpm + I represents the far less resistant route through the extracellular matrix around the SMCs (which lack tight junctions) rather than the parallel trans-SMC AQP1 path. Thus, the 32 ± 4% HgCl2-induced Lpt reduction can only result from a reduction of its endothelium + SI conductivity (Lpe + i) by 51 ± 7% (Eq. 1). An estimate that half of the ΔP-driven transendothelial Jv is transcellular would be surprisingly high.

If this Lpe + i reduction were all in native endothelial Lpe, it would be ΔP independent. Yet, Lpt and Lpe + i drop far less at 100 and 140 mmHg. This suggests that structural changes, as previously demonstrated without HgCl2 (4, 55, 63), may contribute. Lpt versus ΔP has a step shape: high at 60 mmHg, sharply reduced by 80–100 mmHg, and flat to >140 mmHg. Lpm + I (denuded endothelium) is ΔP independent at approximately twice intact vessel Lpt at high ΔP. Normal intact rat aorta SI (∼200 nm), composed of collagen and a loose extracellular matrix, is mostly void [∼93% sucrose space (35)]. A fenestrated IEL separates it from the >100-μm-thick and far denser media [∼42% sucrose space (62)]. We have proposed (35) that rising ΔP pushes ECs against the IEL and dense media. This decreases SI fiber spacing and causes ECs to obstruct IEL fenestrae (Fig. 2A), which substantially raises flow resistance/lowers Lpt. Firm, load-supporting SI collagen fibers limit compression/Lp drop. Denudation removes endothelial resistance and EC fenestra clogging; a higher, ΔP-independent Lpm + I results. Theory has predicted (35) a six- to sevenfold versus subsequently observed (34) fivefold SI compression. The study of Huang et al. (34) shows direct EC fenestral blockade.

Even though the percent drop in Lpt with HgCl2 blockade is ΔP dependent (Fig. 6), the blocked Lpt values are approximately ΔP independent, particularly for 60–100 mmHg. This suggests that AQP1 blockade lowers the critical ΔP to compact the SI/block fenestral: it shifts the step in Lpt versus ΔP leftward to lower ΔP. Analogously, a weaker wind (ΔP) drives a sailboat with an intact sail (blocked AQPs) as fast as a stronger wind drives a boat with a sail with holes (functioning AQP1s). AQP1 blockade not only reduces intrinsic endothelial Lpe, but it also shifts part of the total ΔP = force/area from the media to the endothelium. This lowers the total ΔP needed to achieve the critical force/area on the endothelium for SI compression. At 60 mmHg, HgCl2 exposure lowers Lpe and causes an uncompressed SI to compress; both effects lower Lpe + i. Thus, AQP1 represents <52% of Lpe, yet HgCl2 still causes the large observed drop in Lpe + i and Lpt. At 100 and 140 mmHg, the SI is compressed without HgCl2; thus, the drops in Lpe + i and Lpt with HgCl2 are smaller.

The appendix estimates SI pressure and critical transendothelial pressure for SI compression. Table 6 shows the results. The results predict that HgCl2 lowers ΔP for SI decompression from 60 to <46 mmHg and, with HgCl2, that Lpt is ∼22% higher below 46 mmHg than at 60 mmHg. Measurements (n = 2) found that Lpt with HgCl2 was 17.4 ± 8.6% higher at 20 mmHg than at 60 mmHg.

Table 6.

How AQP1 inhibition influences the state of the SI, endothelial Lp, and mean force/area felt by the endothelium: estimate of Lps for different vessel wall layers at different pressures with or without HgCl2 leading to an estimate of the critical ΔP to decompress SI with HgCl2

ΔP, mmHg
<46
60
60
100
Treatment
HgCl2
No HgCl2
HgCl2
No HgCl2
SI state Decompressed Decompressed Compressed Compressed
Relations (appendix) amongst Lps Lpe + i = Lpe Lpe + i = Lpe Lpi + f from 100 mmHg SI + fenestrae: Lpi + f(Lpe + i, Lpe)
    Lpt ×108 cm·s−1·mmHg−1 2.13 2.55 1.74 2.05/1.84**
    Lpm + I ×108 cm·s−1·mmHg−1* 4.06* 4.06* 4.06* 4.06*
    Lpe + i ×108 cm·s−1·mmHg−1 4.46 6.18 3.27 4.16
    Lpe ×108 cm·s−1·mmHg−1 4.46 6.28 4.46 6.28
    Lpi + f ×108 cm·s−1·mmHg−1 >>12.3 >>12.3 12.3 12.3
Estimated force/area (PL − Pi; in mmHg) on the endothelium ∼22 ∼22 ∼34 ∼46

SI, subendothelial intima; ΔP, pressure difference; Lpt, Lp of the intact entire vessel wall; Lpm + I, Lp of the denuded vessel (media + internal elastic lamina); Lpe, Lp of the endothelium; Lpe + i, Lp of the endothelium + SI; Lpi + f, Lp of the SI + fenestrae; PL, lumen pressure; Pi, SI pressure.

*

Lpm + I is ΔP and HgCl2 independent (Fig. 6A, Table 5). We use Lpm + I at 60 mmHg, and no HgCl2 for the entire estimate for consistency. The average experimental value at each condition differs insignificantly from it. Because of this difference, the resulting estimated value (2.05) for LPt differs (**) from the experimental value (1.84) at 100 mmHg, no HgCl2. This LPt estimate plays no part in the estimation calculation; it is included for completeness.

From estimates of the portion of Lpe due to AQP1 in whole rat aortas and of lp of a single AQP1 from an osmotic swelling study [∼1.3–2.6 × 10−19 cm3·s−1·mmHg−1·AQP−1 (72)], one can estimate the EC membrane AQP1 density and compare it with literature values for red blood cell (RBC) membranes. The appendix constructs a series/parallel AQP1 and junctional flow scheme (Fig. 1B) that, with the data shown in Fig. 6, found ∼1.1–2.2 × 1011 AQPs/cm2 membrane in ECs (∼29–44% of Lpe). This compares well with 1.4–1.9 × 1011 AQPs/cm2 membrane in RBCs [2.0–2.7 × 105 AQP1 channels/RBC (16, 57)]. The consistency of this trans-EC Lpe-derived EC AQP1 density and the osmotic swelling-derived RBC AQP1 densities corroborates/lends confidence to our finding of hydrostatic pressure-driven transendothelial flow in conduit arteries.

Summary and Significance

Osmotic differences (osmotic gradients) drive water across the well-studied family of AQPs. Large arteries are the physiological system where hydrostatic ΔP dominates osmotic gradients. Here, we show, for the first time, that ΔP drives water across arterial ECs via AQP1. AQP1s account for part of Lpe and Lpt, particularly under wall shear, as in vessels, which likely shifts AQP1 to the cell membrane (47). They set the critical transmural ΔP for the SI compression and the net force/area that ECs feel at a ΔP (Table 6). These all have potentially important effects on EC regulation, membrane and cytoskeletal structure, junctional integrity, and conduit artery mural and barrier function. By controlling Lpt, AQP1s may contribute to vessel wall health and pathology by regulating nutrient, catabolite, signal, and harmful solute advection and thus may be attractive drug targets.

The role of AQP1 in arterial endothelial Lpe and wall Lpt may be relevant to early atherogenesis. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (diameter: ∼23nm) transport from the blood into the arterial SI and its subsequent binding to the SI extracellular matrix are key early atherogenic events (56) believed to trigger lesion formation (59). LDLs do not appear to cross the endothelium uniformly but rather focally by ΔP-driven advection (61) around rare [∼1/(2,000–6,000) ECs in the rat aorta (40)], isolated ECs with temporarily loose junctions (36, 58, 67, 73). Lpt-controlled transmural flow can dilute SI LDL, thereby likely slowing its extracellular matrix binding kinetics (24, 71), and flush the SI of unbound LDL. Lower Lpt may impair dilution and clearance. This may be one reason that (pulmonary) hypertension is a strong risk factor for (pulmonary) atherosclerosis (20): chronic hypertension causes artery walls to remodel to a thicker and denser media and the SI to become cellular (29), which significantly lower Lpt versus normotension. Not only might medial thickening regulate Lpt over many months (29), but differential AQP1 expression might allow active, rapid Lpt regulation. At a mean physiological ΔP ∼ 100 mmHg, the SI is fully compressed but close to decompression ΔPs (3, 55). Figure 6 shows that SI compression decreases Lpt by ∼1/3; thus, SI decompression at normal or hypertensive ΔP can potentially raise Lpt by ∼50%. Coronary arteries experience ∼20% lower systole ΔP than the aorta when their blood flow is generally blocked (7). These vessels may be particularly susceptible to SI decompression, via naturally or pharmacologically increased EC AQP1 channels, to slow lipid transport and SI extracellular matrix binding. The next step is to observe disease progression in lipid-fed apolipoprotein E-deficient mice with normal and reduced AQP1. Unfortunately, the AQP1 knockout mouse suffers microcardia, reduced stroke volume, thin vessel walls, and hypotension (41). A model with reduced AQP1 only in conduit arteries but not elsewhere would be ideal.

EC-derived KLF2 facilitates atheroprotective EC and SMC phenotypes and induces exosomal transport of microRNAs from ECs to SMCs to produce a nonproliferative SMC phenotype (32). One of its earliest effects is AQP1 upregulation (8). Shear upregulates KLF2. KLF2 is expressed nonuniformly in arteries, with far lower expression at arterial branch points (2), the sites of low shear and high EC turnover, tracer permeability, and atherosclerosis proclivity (12). This is consistent with more solute, fewer AQP1 and less water transport. Since EC-derived nitric oxide exits ECs via AQP1 (7), ECs with fewer functioning AQP1s (at branches or via blockade or knockdown) likely transport less nitric oxide to medial SMCs. In contrast, in straight arterial regions, wall shear stress yields lower EC turnover and an endothelium less permeable to large solutes (25) and with lower inflammation (8). KLF2/AQP1 induction may reduce inflammation by slowing SI lipid entrainment that attracts monocytes that mature to macrophages.

GRANTS

This work was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant 1-R01-HL-067383 and National Science Foundation (NSF) Grants IOS-0922051 and CTS-0077520. T. Nguyen and S. Russell were partially supported by Levich Institute Soft Materials NSF-Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship Grant DGE-0221589, S. Russel was partially supported by a Barbara Slifka City University of New York (CUNY) Dissertation-Year Fellowship, and J. Toussaint was partially supported by the Graduate School and University Center/CUNY Alliances for Graduate Education and the Professoriate program.

DISCLOSURES

No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the author(s).

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Author contributions: T.N., J.D.T., Y.X., C.B.R., L.M.C., S.R., Y. Shou, Y. Sun, and R.Y. performed experiments; T.N., J.D.T., Y.X., C.B.R., L.M.C., S.R., Y. Shou, O.S., R.Y., and D.S.R. analyzed data; T.N., J.D.T., C.B.R., L.M.C., J.M.T., K.-M.J., and D.S.R. interpreted results of experiments; T.N., J.D.T., Y.X., C.B.R., and L.M.C. prepared figures; C.B.R., L.M.C., J.M.T., and D.S.R. edited and revised manuscript; J.M.T., K.-M.J., and D.S.R. approved final version of manuscript; K.-M.J. and D.S.R. conception and design of research; D.S.R. drafted manuscript.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank Dr. Steve Quarfordt for extensive discussions/suggestions on, but not limited to, presentation and Dr. S. Joshi and J. Abrams for acquiring early transmission electron microscopy images. The authors also thank Prof. Asohan Amarasingham and Prof. Mark Brown for statistical suggestions, including bootstrap methods. D. S. Rumschitzki thanks Dr. Alan Verkman for enlightening discussions and Dr. B. M. Fu for comments on manuscript.

Appendix: TECHNICAL ARGUMENTS

The Meaning of Lp Ratios and TAMRA Tracer Permeability P0 Ratios

The results show that HgCl2 (siRNA) treatment of BAECs (RAECs) reduces Lp significantly and does not change P0. Rather than concluding from this qualitative argument that Lp represents paracellular and transcellular flow, we invoked two statistical tests with the following background. Diffusive transport under a fixed concentration gradient is proportional to the open junction cross-sectional area, which is, to a very good approximation, the total junction length (L) in the monolayer times the mean junction width (h). If L is the same for all monolayers of a given cell type (BAEC or RAEC), a lower diffusive transport indicates a smaller h. Liquid flow through a porous media obeys Darcy's law, and the Darcy flow rate through a slit (the junction) is proportional to h; thus, the Darcy flow across the monolayer is also proportional to h. If all transendothelial flow were paracellular, then both the post-to-pretreatment ratio of Lp and of P0 would each reflect the post-to-pretreatment ratio of h (Fig. 2B) (assuming a Poiseuille junction flow means that the junctional portion of Lp goes ∼h3 rather than ∼h); measuring Lp and P0 ratios would then sample the same distribution of post-to-pretreatment h ratios. Tables 1 and 2 show P values (4 × 10−3 for BAECs and 4 × 10−8: for RAECs) comparing the sets of Lp and P0 ratios; the results showed that they were different, i.e., they arose from different distributions. This means that Lp is not just paracellular flow.

Bootstrap Statistics

The bootstrap (14, 21) is a resampling method that allows testing of a statistical hypothesis based on the resampling of acquired data to get the distribution of a derived statistic. The key point of these methods is that after each sampling of this statistic, one returns the randomly selected datum to the pool from which the next sample is chosen. The distribution of the derived statistic results, from which one can determine confidence intervals for that statistic.

To construct a test statistic, let superscript 1 on Lp and P denote mean posttreatment and superscript 0 denote mean pretreatment (with the “0” in P0 dropped for clarity). Define statistic S as the ratio of Lps minus the ratio of TAMRA P0s (or, for Poiseuille flow, of its cube). S has a mean zero for purely paracellular water transport. The following equation results:

S=Lp1Lp0(P1P0)j;j={1Darcy3Poisseuillte}

If part of the water transport is transcellular and treatment increases that portion, with the paracellular portion unchanged, then S is positive7. Let the null hypothesis be S ≥ 0: either transport is purely paracellular or treatment (BAECs: HgCl2 exposure; RAECs: anti-AQP1 siRNA) increases or does not decrease transcellular transport fast enough. Figure 7 shows the distributions of S for RAEC (A) and BAEC (B) data for Darcy flow (j = 1). In both cases, nearly all of the distribution's mass is left of zero, with 99% confidence for BAECs that S is negative (less than −0.050) and 99% confidence that S for RAECs is (very) negative (less than −0.52). The confidence for RAECs is better because n is larger for the Lp experiments on RAECs than on BAECs and the variances of both Lp and solute drag experiments for siRNA on RAECs are tighter than for HgCl2 on BAECs. Poiseuille junction flow (j = 3) gives (not shown) a similar confidence interval for RAEC data and >96% confidence that the test statistic is negative (less than −0.0035) for BAEC data. Thus, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that Lp has both transcellular and paracellular contributions and that treatment decreases transcellular transport. Tables 1 and 2 show these statistical results for BAEC and RAEC data.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Bootstrap method resampled distribution of test statistic S (appendix), which represents the difference between the ratio of treated to untreated monolayer Lp minus the ratio of treated to untreated transendothelial TAMRA diffusive permeabilities. The appendix argues that this statistic tests the null hypothesis (S ≥ 0) that the drop in Lp upon treatment is due to changes in paracellular transport [i.e., treatment only affects mean inter-EC junction width (h)]. The resampled statistics reject the null hypothesis; thus the mean of S < 0 with [exceedingly (A)] high confidence for RAEC (A) and BAEC (B) data. We conclude that transcellular transport is significant and that the treatment in both cases inhibits transcellular water transport.

Details of the Estimate of the Pressure Needed to Decompress the SI in the Presence of HgCl2 and of the Corresponding Lpt

Let PL, Pi, and Pa be lumen, SI, and adventitial pressures, respectively, with ΔP = PL − Pa. At steady state, Jv across the whole wall equals both that across the endothelium and that across the media. Each flux is the product of that layer's Lp and the ΔP across it: Lpt(PL − Pa) = Lpe + i(PL − Pi) = Lpm + I(Pi − Pa). Simple manipulation estimates the steady force/area, PL − Pi=(Lpt/Lpe + i)ΔP, on the endothelium. As shown in Fig. 6, HgCl2 blockade at 60 mmHg raises this steady force/area 55% from (2.55/6.85)60≈22 to (1.74/3.06)60≈34 mmHg at ΔP = 60 mmHg. Raising ΔP from 60 to 100 mmHg, a ΔP where our theory predicts a compressed SI even without HgCl2 and increases the force/area on the endothelium to [(1.84/3.97)100]≈46 mmHg. These numbers motivate the estimate below of the critical ΔP needed for SI decompression with HgCl2. Table 6 shows the main relations and layer Lp and force/area estimates derived below.

As in Eq. 1, split the total specific resistance, 1/Lpe + i, of the endothelium + SI+ IEL fenestral entrance into the sum of endothelial, 1/Lpe, plus SI + fenestral, Lpi + f, resistances (Fig. 2A), as follows:

1Lpe+1=1Lpe+1Lpi+f (2)

When the SI is decompressed, the resistance of the SI plus fenestrae is much smaller than that of the endothelium, or LpeLpe + i(60 mmHg, no HgCl2) ∼ (6.28 ± 1.72) × 10−8 cm·s−1·mmHg−1 (this number is the mean, neglecting one outlier, of the individual Lpe + i values calculated for each vessel using Eq. 1). Compression by increasing ΔP changes Lpe + i (mainly by fenestral blockage) but leaves Lpe unchanged. Thus, the change in Lpe + i allows one to estimate Lpi + f: if one uses the above Lpe value in Eq. 2 at 100 mmHg without blocker and uses the Lpe + i value (4.16 × 10−8 cm·s−1·mmHg−1, again the average of the individual values calculated for each vessel using Eq. 1) for these conditions, one obtains Lpi + f of ∼(1/4.16 × 10−8 − 1/6.28 × 10−8)−1 = 12.3 × 10−8 cm·s−1·mmHg−1 when the SI is fully compressed. If the SI at 60 mmHg with HgCl2 is also fully compressed, then this Lpi + f should be the same there. One can calculate the drop in Lpe at 60 mmHg due to HgCl2: Eq. 2 estimates that Lpe with HgCl2 drops ∼29% to Lpe ∼ (1/3.27 × 10−8 − 1/12.3 × 10−8)−1 = 4.46 × 10−8 cm·s−1·mmHg−1. Since we seek a ΔP to decompress the SI with HgCl2, which would require LpeLpe + i, inserting this value for Lpe + i and the denuded Lpm + I into Eq. 1 estimates the overall Lpt for the vessel wall at this unknown ΔP. Together with Lpm + I ∼ 4.06 × 10−8 cm·s−1·mmHg−1 at 60 mmHg (Fig. 6), this value and Eq. 1 give Lpt ∼ (1/4.46 × 10−8 + 1/4.06 × 10−8)−1 = 2.13 × 10−8 cm·s−1·mmHg−1, ∼22% higher than Lpt (1.74 × 10−8 cm·s−1·mmHg−1) at 60 mmHg with HgCl2. [By comparison, Lpt (2.55 × 10−8 cm·s−1·mmHg−1) at 60 mmHg without HgCl2 is 46% higher than with HgCl2, since HgCl2 lowers Lpe.] Fluid incompressibility and steady state mean that the flow across the endothelium and across the wall are equal, i.e., LptΔP = Lpe + i(PL − Pi) ∼ 4.46 × 10−8(PL − Pi) when the SI is decompressed in the presence of HgCl2. For PL − Pi ∼ 22 mmHg, a value established above as low enough to decompress the SI at 60 mmHg without blocker, and Lpt ∼ 2.13 × 10−8 cm·s−1·mmHg−1, this equation predicts a value of ΔP ≤ 46 mmHg is adequate for SI decompression. Since the SI is decompressed and Lpe + iLpe, Lpt is the same for any lower ΔP.

Estimation of AQP1 Expression in the EC Membrane

Recall that 1/Lpe + i = 1/Lpt − 1/Lpm + I. If AQP accounts for part of the intrinsic Lpe, then blockade of AQP1 will alter the effective parameter Lpe + i. Let Lpj be the junctional contribution to endothelial Lpe. The flows through inter-EC junctions and through the AQPs occur in parallel. The cell has more than one membrane that water must traverse in series (Fig. 2B). Since Starling's law is linear, in parallel, linear conductivities add and, in series, their inverses add. Suppose the cell has m layers in series, the ith of which has ni AQPs per layer (i = 1, . . . ., m). The ni AQPs in a layer operate in parallel. Thus, the total endothelial conductivity for this setup is LpeLpj + lpi(1/ni)]−1. If ni = n is i independent, then:

LpeLpj+nlp/m (3)

We now estimate Lpj. If HgCl2 blocks all AQP, then Lpj is just Lpe with blocker. As above, if the SI is decompressed, then Lpi + f is far larger than Lpe; thus, Lpe + iLpe. In the argument for decompressing the SI in the presence of HgCl2 we found that the SI is decompressed at 20 mmHg with or without HgCl2. Thus, LpjLpe + i (20 mmHg, HgCl2). Similarly, without HgCl2, LpeLpe + i (relaxed SI) ∼ Lpe + i (20 mmHg, no HgCl2). With these estimates for Lpj and Lpe, Eq. 3 reduces to nlp/mLpe (20 mmHg, no HgCl2) − Lpe + i (20 mmHg, HgCl2). We have values for Lpt with [(1.90 ± 0.28) × 10−8 cm·s−1·mmHg−1] and without [(2.50 ± 0.12) × 10−8 cm·s−1·mmHg−1] blocker at 20 mmHg on the same vessel. If we use the 60-mmHg value for Lpm + I = 4.055 × 10−8 cm·s−1·mmHg−1 in Eq. 1, we can calculate Lpe + i at 20 mmHg for both conditions. We found nlp/m ∼ 6.5 × 10−8 − 3.6 × 10−8 ∼ 2.9 × 10−8 cm·s−1·mmHg−1 and %(nlp/m)/Lpe ∼ 44%. For lp ∼ 1.3–2.6 × 10−19 cm3·s−1·mmHg−1·AQP−1 (72), this equation gives n/m ∼ (1.1–2.2) × 1011 AQP channels/cm2 layer for an EC. A RBC [2.0–2.7 × 105 AQP1 channels/RBC (16, 57), surface area: ∼140 μm2, n = 2 layers (luminal, abluminal)] has 1.4–1.9 × 1011 AQP channels/cm2 layer. The consistency of the RBC estimate of AQP1 density derived from osmotic experiments and this Lp data-derived EC AQP1 density estimate derived from hydrostatic pressure experiments further supports AQP1-mediated transcellular flow.

Footnotes

1

Paired, e.g., when simultaneously measuring Lps of pairs of otherwise identical control and treated monolayers; unpaired when measurement pairs were not done simultaneously.

2

At 0.8 nm, TAMRA is large enough that, even if the intercellular junction is composed of two sets of pores, one for water and large tracers (of width h) and one for small tracers (the latter responsible for ∼5% of water transport) (70), TAMRA only crosses the larger water pores.

3

These ratios are straightforward for paired Lp measurements. The 16 solute drag experimental monolayers are done in 2 batches, each with 4 treated layers paired to 4 control layers done together. Thus, for each 8-monolayer experiment, we include all 16 possible (total 32) ratios.

4

μ ± SE calculated on log base 2 of fold change. Different ± values were from taking base 2 power.

5

Thus, advection and diffusion compete. Lower Lp with HgCl2 means less solute clearance after the membrane. This reduces the diffusive driving force, which contributes to and lowers Pc.

6

Concentration polarization, the buildup of solute on the upstream side of a filter, can affect the value of Lp inferred from flow data. As long as the perfusate albumin concentration is >1 g/dl (we used 4 g/dl), the surface glycocalyx is saturated and the concentration polarization effect is weak (60). Since our filtration rates are at most within a factor of two (usually far less) of each other, any concentration polarization might affect absolute Lp, but not significantly the relative post-to-pretreatment Lpt values, especially not whether they go up or go down, which is our concern.

7

More precisely, if a portion of the water transport is transcellular, but either transcellular is nondecreasing and paracellular is nonincreasing or transcellular decreases less than any possible decrease (to power j) in paracellular transport with treatment, then S ≥ 0.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Aduayom I, Denizeau F, Jumarie C. Multiple effects of mercury on cell volume regulation, plasma membrane permeability, and thiol content in the human intestinal cell line Caco-2. Cell Biol Toxicol 21: 163–179, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Atkins GB, Jain MK. Role of Kruppel-like transcription factors in endothelial biology. Circ Res 100: 1686–1695, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Baldwin AL, Wilson LM. Endothelium increases medial hydraulic conductance of aorta, possibly by release of EDRF. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 264: H26–H32, 1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Baldwin AL, Wilson LM, Simon BR. Effect of pressure on hydraulic conductance. Arterioscler Thromb 12: 163–171, 1992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ballatori N, Shi C, Boyer JL. Altered plasma membrane ion permeability in mercury-induced cell injury: studies in hepatocytes of elasmobranch Raja erinacea. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 95: 279–291, 1988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Barnes DM, Sykes DB, Miller DS. Multiple effects of mercuric chloride on hexose transport in Xenopus oocytes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1419: 289–298, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bellamy RF. Diastolic coronary artery pressure-flow relations in the dog. Circ Res 43: 92–101, 1978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Boon RA, Leyen TA, Fontijn RD, Fledderus JO, Baggen JM, Volger OL, van Nieuw Amerongen GP, Horrevoets AJ. KLF2-induced actin shear fibers control both alignment to flow and JNK signaling in vascular endothelium. Blood 115: 2533–2542, 2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Brooks HL, Regan JW, Yool AJ. Inhibition of aquaporin-1 water permeability by tetraethylammonium: involvement of the loop E pore region. Mol Pharmacol 57: 1021–1026, 2000. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cabral PD, Herrera M. Membrane-associated aquaporin-1 facilitates osmotically driven water flux across the basolateral membrane of the thick ascending limb. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 303: F621–F629, 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cancel LM, Fitting A, Tarbell JM. In vitro study of LDL transport under pressurized (convective) conditions. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 293: H126–H132, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chiu JJ, Chien S. Effects of disturbed flow on vascular endothelium: pathophysiological basis and clinical perspectives. Physiol Rev 91: 327–387, 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cowen T, Haven AJ, Burnstock G. Pontamine sky blue: a counterstain for background autofluorescence in fluorescence and immunofluorescence histochemistry. Histochemistry 82: 205–208, 1985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Davison AC, Hinkley DV. Bootstrap Methods and Their Application. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.DeMaio L, Tarbell JM, Scaduto RC Jr, Gardner TW, Antonetti DA. A transmural pressure gradient induces mechanical and biological adaptive responses in endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 286: H731–H741, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Denker BM, Smith BL, Kuhajda FP, Agre P. Identification, purification, and partial characterization of a novel Mr 28,000 integral membrane protein from erythrocytes and renal tubules. J Biol Chem 263: 15634–15642, 1988. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Devuyst O, Yool AJ. Aquaporin-1: new developments and perspectives for peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 30: 135–141, 2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dolman D, Drndarski S, Abbott NJ, Rattray M. Induction of aquaporin 1 but not aquaporin 4 messenger RNA in rat primary brain microvessel endothelial cells in culture. J Neurochem 93: 825–833, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dreher MR, Liu W, Michelich CR, Dewhirst MW, Yuan F, Chilkoti A. Tumor vascular permeability, accumulation, and penetration of macromolecular drug carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 98: 335–344, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Duff GL, McMillan GC. Pathology of atherosclerosis. Am J Med 11: 92–108, 1951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Endeward V, Musa-Aziz R, Cooper GJ, Chen LM, Pelletier MF, Virkki LV, Supuran CT, King LS, Boron WF, Gros G. Evidence that aquaporin 1 is a major pathway for CO2 transport across the human erythrocyte membrane. FASEB J 20: 1974–1981, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Folkesson HG, Matthay MA, Hasegawa H, Kheradmand F, Verkman AS. Transcellular water transport in lung alveolar epithelium through mercury-sensitive water channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 4970–4974, 1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Frank JS, Fogelman AM. Ultrastructure of the intima in WHHL and cholesterol-fed rabbit aortas prepared by ultra-rapid freezing and freeze-etching. J Lipid Res 30: 967–978, 1989. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gao C, Tang J, Li R, Huan J. Specific inhibition of AQP1 water channels in human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells by small interfering RNAs. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 72: 150–161, 2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Georgiou E, Maldarelli C, Papageorgiou DT, Rumschitzki DS. An asymptotic theory for the linear-stability of a core annular-flow in the thin annular limit. J Fluid Mech 243: 653–677, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gonzalez E, Nagiel A, Lin AJ, Golan DE, Michel T. Small interfering RNA-mediated down-regulation of caveolin-1 differentially modulates signaling pathways in endothelial cells. J Biol Chem 279: 40659–40669, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Guo P, Weinstein AM, Weinbaum S. A dual-pathway ultrastructural model for the tight junction of rat proximal tubule epithelium. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 285: F241–F257, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hadjiisky P, Peyri N, Grosgogeat Y. Tunica media changes in the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR). Atherosclerosis 65: 125–137, 1987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hara-Chikuma M, Verkman AS. Aquaporin-1 facilitates epithelial cell migration in kidney proximal tubule. J Am Soc Nephrol 17: 39–45, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hasegawa H, Lian SC, Finkbeiner WE, Verkman AS. Extrarenal tissue distribution of CHIP28 water channels by in situ hybridization and antibody staining. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 266: C893–C903, 1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hergenreider E, Heydt S, Treguer K, Boettger T, Horrevoets AJ, Zeiher AM, Scheffer MP, Frangakis AS, Yin X, Mayr M, Braun T, Urbich C, Boon RA, Dimmeler S. Atheroprotective communication between endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells through miRNAs. Nat Cell Biol 14: 249–256, 2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Herrera M, Hong NJ, Garvin JL. Aquaporin-1 transports NO across cell membranes. Hypertension 48: 157–164, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Huang Y, Jan KM, Rumschitzki D, Weinbaum S. Structural changes in rat aortic intima due to transmural pressure. ASME J Biomech Eng 120: 476–483, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Huang Y, Rumschitzki D, Chien S, Weinbaum S. A fiber matrix model for the filtration through fenestral pores in a compressible arterial intima. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 272: H2023–H2039, 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Huang Y, Rumschitzki D, Chien S, Weinbaum S. A fiber matrix model for the growth of macromolecular leakage spots in the arterial intima. ASME J Biomech Eng 116: 430–445, 1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Isenring P, Jacoby SC, Payne JA, Forbush B 3rd. Comparison of Na-K-Cl cotransporters. NKCC1, NKCC2, and the HEK cell Na-L-Cl cotransporter. J Biol Chem 273: 11295–11301, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jang KJ, Cho HS, Kang do H, Bae WG, Kwon TH, Suh KY. Fluid-shear-stress-induced translocation of aquaporin-2 and reorganization of actin cytoskeleton in renal tubular epithelial cells. Integr Biol (Camb) 3: 134–141, 2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lee J, Kim S, Kim J, Jeong MH, Oh Y, Choi KC. Increased expression of renal aquaporin water channels in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Kidney Blood Press Res 29: 18–23, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lin SL, Jan KM, Schuessler GB, Weinbaum S, Chien S. Enhanced macromolecular permeability of aortic endothelial cells in association with mitosis. Atherosclerosis 73: 223–232, 1988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Montiel V, Leon Gomez E, Bouzin C, Esfahani H, Romero Perez M, Lobysheva I, Devuyst O, Dessy C, Balligand JL. Genetic deletion of aquaporin-1 results in microcardia and low blood pressure in mouse with intact nitric oxide-dependent relaxation, but enhanced prostanoids-dependent relaxation. Pflügers Arch 466: 237–251, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Muller-Marschhausen K, Waschke J, Drenckhahn D. Physiological hydrostatic pressure protects endothelial monolayer integrity. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 294: C324–C332, 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Nakhoul NL, Hering-Smith KS, Abdulnour-Nakhoul SM, Hamm LL. Transport of NH3/NH4+ in oocytes expressing aquaporin-1. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 281: F255–F263, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Nielsen S, Smith BL, Christensen EI, Agre P. Distribution of the aquaporin CHIP in secretory and resorptive epithelia and capillary endothelia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90: 7275–7279, 1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Owler BK, Pitham T, Wang D. Aquaporins: relevance to cerebrospinal fluid physiology and therapeutic potential in hydrocephalus. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res 7: 15, 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Papageorgiou D, Maldarelli C, Rumschitzki D. Nonlinear interfacial stability of core-annular film flows. Phys Fluids A 2: 340–352, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Pohl M, Shan Q, Petsch T, Styp-Rekowska B, Matthey P, Bleich M, Bachmann S, Theilig F. Short-term functional adaptation of aquaporin-1 surface expression in the proximal tubule, a component of glomerulotubular balance. J Am Soc Nephrol; doi: 10.1681/ASN.2014020148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Presnell J, Schreibman M. Animal Tissue Techniques. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins Univ. Press, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Preston GM, Jung JS, Guggino WB, Agre P. The mercury-sensitive residue at cysteine 189 in the CHIP28 water channel. J Biol Chem 268: 17–20, 1993. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Rensen SS, Niessen PM, Long X, Doevendans PA, Miano JM, van Eys GJ. Contribution of serum response factor and myocardin to transcriptional regulation of smoothelins. Cardiovasc Res 70: 136–145, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Russell S, Cancel LM, Tarbell JM, Rumschitzki DS. A protein diffusion model of the sealing effect. Chem Eng Sci 64: 4504–4514, 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Saadoun S, Papadopoulos MC, Hara-Chikuma M, Verkman AS. Impairment of angiogenesis and cell migration by targeted aquaporin-1 gene disruption. Nature 434: 786–792, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Shanahan CM, Connolly DL, Tyson KL, Cary NR, Osbourn JK, Agre P, Weissberg PL. Aquaporin-1 is expressed by vascular smooth muscle cells and mediates rapid water transport across vascular cell membranes. J Vasc Res 36: 353–362, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Shi ZD, Ji XY, Berardi DE, Qazi H, Tarbell JM. Interstitial flow induces MMP-1 expression and vascular SMC migration in collagen I gels via an ERK1/2-dependent and c-Jun-mediated mechanism. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 298: H127–H135, 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Shou Y, Jan KM, Rumschitzki DS. Transport in rat vessel walls. I. Hydraulic conductivities of the aorta, pulmonary artery, and inferior vena cava with intact and denuded endothelia. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 291: H2758–H2771, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Simionescu N, Vasile E, Lupu F, Popescu G, Simionescu M. Prelesional events in atherogenesis. Accumulation of extracellular cholesterol-rich liposomes in the arterial intima and cardiac valves of the hyperlipidemic rabbit. Am J Pathol 123: 109–125, 1986. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Solomon AK, Chasan B, Dix JA, Lukacovic MF, Toon MR, Verkman AS. The aqueous pore in the red cell membrane: band 3 as a channel for anions, cations, nonelectrolytes, and water. Ann NY Acad Sci 414: 97–124, 1983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Stemerman MB, Morrel EM, Burke KR, Colton CK, Smith KA, Lees RS. Local variation in arterial wall permeability to low density lipoprotein in normal rabbit aorta. Arteriosclerosis 6: 64–69, 1986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Tabas I, Williams KJ, Boren J. Subendothelial lipoprotein retention as the initiating process in atherosclerosis: update and therapeutic implications. Circulation 116: 1832–1844, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Tarbell JM, Lever MJ, Caro CG. The effect of varying albumin concentration of the hydraulic conductivity of the rabbit common carotid artery. Microvasc Res 35: 204–220, 1988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Tedgui A, Lever John M. The interaction of convection and diffusion in the transport of 131I-albumin within the media of the rabbit thoracic aorta. Circ Res 57: 856–863, 1985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Tedgui A, Lever MJ. Effect of presure and intimal damage on 131I-albumen and [14C]sucrose spaces in the aorta. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 253: H1530–H1539, 1987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Tedgui A, Lever MJ. Filtration through damaged and undamaged rabbit thoracic aorta. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 247: H784–H791, 1984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Tomassoni D, Bramanti V, Amenta F. Expression of aquaporins 1 and 4 in the brain of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Brain Res 1325: 155–163, 2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Verkman AS. More than just water channels: unexpected cellular roles of aquaporins. J Cell Sci 118: 3225–3232, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Voigtlaender J, Heindl B, Becker BF. Transmembrane water influx via aquaporin-1 is inhibited by barbiturates and propofol in red blood cells. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 366: 209–217, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Weinbaum S, Tzeghai G, Ganatos P, Pfeffer R, Chien S. Effect of cell turnover and leaky junctions on arterial macromolecular transport. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 248: H945–H960, 1985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Wen Q, Diecke FP, Iserovich P, Kuang K, Sparrow J, Fischbarg J. Immunocytochemical localization of aquaporin-1 in bovine corneal endothelial cells and keratocytes. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 226: 463–467, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Yang B, Fukuda N, van Hoek A, Matthay MA, Ma T, Verkman AS. Carbon dioxide permeability of aquaporin-1 measured in erythrocytes and lung of aquaporin-1 null mice and in reconstituted proteoliposomes. J Biol Chem 275: 2686–2692, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Yang B, Kim JK, Verkman AS. Comparative efficacy of HgCl2 with candidate aquaporin-1 inhibitors DMSO, gold, TEA+ and acetazolamide. FEBS Lett 580: 6679–6684, 2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Yin Y, Lim KH, Weinbaum S, Chien S, Rumschitzki D. A model for the initiation and growth of extracellular lipid liposomes in arterial intima. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 272: H1033–H1046, 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Zeidel ML, Ambudkar SV, Smith BL, Agre P. Reconstitution of functional water channels in liposomes containing purified red cell CHIP28 protein. Biochemistry 31: 7436–7440, 1992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Zeng Z, Jan KM, Rumschitzki DS. A theory for water and macromolecular transport in the pulmonary artery wall with a detailed comparison to the aorta. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 302: H1683–H1699, 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology are provided here courtesy of American Physiological Society

RESOURCES