Skip to main content
Pediatrics logoLink to Pediatrics
. 2015 Sep;136(3):440–449. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-1108

Suicide Attempts and Childhood Maltreatment Among Street Youth: A Prospective Cohort Study

Scott E Hadland a,b, Evan Wood c,d, Huiru Dong c, Brandon DL Marshall e, Thomas Kerr c,d, Julio S Montaner c,d, Kora DeBeck c,f,
PMCID: PMC4552091  PMID: 26240210

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Although suicide is a known leading cause of death among street youth, few prospective studies have explored childhood experiences as risk factors for future suicide attempt in this population. We examined the risk of attempted suicide in relation to childhood maltreatment among street youth.

METHODS:

From September 2005 to November 2013, data were collected from the At Risk Youth Study (ARYS), a prospective cohort of street youth in Vancouver, Canada. Inclusion criteria were age 14 to 26 years, past-month illicit drug use, and street involvement. Participants completed the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, an instrument measuring self-reported sexual, physical, and emotional abuse and physical and emotional neglect. Suicide attempts were assessed semiannually. Using Cox regression, we examined the association between the 5 types of maltreatment and suicide attempts.

RESULTS:

Of 660 participants, 68.2% were male and 24.6% were Aboriginal. Median age was 21.5 years. The prevalence of moderate to extreme childhood maltreatment ranged from 16.8% (sexual abuse) to 45.2% (emotional abuse). Participants contributed 1841 person-years, with suicide attempts reported by 35 (5.3%) individuals (crude incidence density: 1.9 per 100 person-years; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4–2.6 per 100 person-years). In adjusted analyses, types of maltreatment associated with suicide attempts included physical abuse (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 4.47; 95% CI: 2.12–9.42), emotional abuse (adjusted HR: 4.92; 95% CI: 2.11–11.5), and emotional neglect (adjusted HR: 3.08; 95% CI: 1.05–9.03).

CONCLUSIONS:

Childhood maltreatment is associated with subsequent risk of suicidal behavior among street youth. Suicide prevention efforts should be targeted toward this marginalized population and delivered from a trauma-informed perspective.


What’s Known on This Subject:

Street youth demonstrate elevated mortality compared with the general adolescent and young adult population. Suicide is a leading cause of death among street youth. Many street youth have experienced childhood maltreatment, including abuse and neglect.

What This Study Adds:

In this prospective cohort of street youth, self-reported attempted suicide and history of childhood maltreatment were common. Individuals who experienced childhood physical abuse, emotional abuse, or emotional neglect were at highest risk of attempting suicide.

Each year, >10 000 adolescents and young adults die of suicide in the United States, where it is the third leading cause of death among youth aged 15 to 24 years and accounts for 20% of all deaths in this age group.1 In Canada, suicide also accounts for 20% of all deaths among those <25 years old and is the second leading cause of death among adolescents and young adults.2 General population–based estimates of suicidal behavior may not accurately reflect rates among hidden youth populations, particularly those who are homeless or street-involved and may be at even higher risk of suicide. Street youth (young people living or working all or part of their time on the street) are a marginalized population with greatly elevated mortality compared with the general youth population.3 In one of the only longitudinal studies of mortality among street youth conducted to date, the death rate was 11 times that of the general youth population, and suicide was the single leading cause of death.4

Understanding why street youth are at high risk of suicide is critical to developing prevention efforts. Illicit drug use, which is highly prevalent among street youth,5,6 is strongly associated with suicidal ideation and behavior.4,710 Illicit drug use is, in turn, associated with childhood maltreatment, which can include sexual, physical, and emotional abuse and physical and emotional neglect.11,12 Among adult drug users, childhood physical and sexual abuse are determinants of suicidal ideation and attempts.13,14 Emotional abuse and physical and emotional neglect have been the subject of less study but are emerging as important risk factors for suicide.15,16 A history of childhood maltreatment is common among street youth,17 but its association with suicide in this vulnerable population has received little study. In addition, the contributions of different types of abuse (sexual, physical, and emotional) and neglect (physical and emotional) to suicide risk have not been systematically examined.

We conducted this prospective cohort study in street youth to examine the risk of attempted suicide in relation to childhood maltreatment. We hypothesized that more severe levels of maltreatment would be associated with an elevated risk of attempting suicide. Consistent with recent data from adults,16 we also hypothesized that emotional abuse and neglect would be correlates of risk of attempted suicide.

Methods

Study Design

The At Risk Youth Study (ARYS) is a prospective cohort of street youth in Vancouver, Canada, which has been described previously.18 Participants were recruited between September 2005 and November 2013. Inclusion criteria were age 14 to 26 years and past-month use of illicit drugs other than marijuana. (Because marijuana use is highly prevalent among Canadian youth,19 inclusion criteria required use of drugs other than marijuana to enroll youth at risk of initiating injection, a primary study outcome.) Eligible youth were street-involved, defined as having been without housing in the preceding 6 months, or, if not homeless, having accessed services for street-involved youth during that time.6,20,21

Recruitment occurred during daytime and nighttime in neighborhoods where street youth were known to congregate, with snowball sampling to recruit additional participants. Informed consent was obtained, and baseline and semiannual follow-up interviews were completed at a storefront location in downtown Vancouver. Participants were listed in study records by name, but identities were safeguarded by institutional review board–approved study protocols.18 As part of consent procedures, participants were advised verbally and in writing of the legal duty to report abuse of persons aged <19 years in British Columbia and were assured of their right to refuse to answer questions on this or any other topic. Participants were remunerated 20 Canadian dollars at baseline and follow-up visits. The ARYS was approved by the University of British Columbia and Providence Health Care Research Ethics Board.

Measures

Participants underwent an interviewer-administered questionnaire capturing sociodemographic characteristics, drug use, and sexual behaviors. The questionnaire included the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale, a validated instrument with a standardized cutoff of >21 indicating high levels of depressive symptoms.22,23 At baseline and follow-up visits occurring semiannually, participants also completed a nurse-administered interview with questions on past-6-month suicide attempts. Emergency referral services were available for participants with active suicidal ideation or suspected ongoing abuse or neglect.

The primary outcome of interest was the response to the question, “In the last 6 months, have you attempted suicide?” We also ascertained lifetime suicidal ideation with the question, “Have you ever seriously thought about taking your own life?” Nurse interviewers were trained to differentiate intentional suicide attempts from accidental drug overdoses. The primary exposure was self-reported childhood maltreatment based on responses to the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ), which participants completed at baseline. The CTQ is a validated 25-item measure that has been successfully used among street-involved youth, with subscales detecting 5 types of maltreatment: (1) sexual abuse, (2) physical abuse, (3) emotional abuse, (4) physical neglect, and (5) emotional neglect.2426

The CTQ provides a separate score for each type of maltreatment based on 5-point Likert responses ranging from 1 (“never true”) to 5 (“very often true”). All questions began with the prompt, “When I was growing up…,” to specifically address experiences from childhood. Sample questions included, “…I was punished with a belt, a board, a cord, or some other hard object” (physical abuse) and “…People in my family said hurtful or insulting things to me” (emotional abuse).26 We used validated standard cutoffs for each of the 5 CTQ subscales: “no or minimal” maltreatment (score of 5–8), “low to moderate” (score of 9–12), “moderate to severe” (score of 13–15), and “severe to extreme” (score >15).26,27

Other measured characteristics included the following: age, gender, Aboriginal ancestry, sexual identity (lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender), current enrollment in or previous completion of high school, past-6-month homelessness, use of street-based outreach services (outreach worker, street nurse, health van, home care worker/nurse, safe injection facility, or youth drop-in center), daily alcohol use, injection drug use, overdose, sex work (trading sex for money/drugs/shelter/clothing), and CES-D score >21.

Sample

Although the ARYS continued open enrollment beyond the study period for the present analysis, the sample included here was restricted to the 660 (66.0%) participants of 1002 individuals recruited who had returned for ≥1 follow-up visit by November 2013. Those who returned for follow-up were similar to those who did not with regard to key study variables, including past-6-month suicide attempts, CTQ subscale scores, and all other characteristics (P > .05 for all).

Statistical Analyses

We calculated the proportion of youth reporting a suicide attempt during the study period and, on the basis of the person-time method, calculated the crude incidence density of attempted suicide. We next compared those who reported a suicide attempt during follow-up with those who did not with regard to baseline characteristics. Analyses used the Pearson χ2 test and Fisher’s exact test (for cell counts <5) for categorical variables and the Wilcoxon test for continuous variables. We then compared those with and without a suicide attempt according to each type of childhood maltreatment using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test for ordinal data.

Next, using the Kaplan-Meier method, we compared the cumulative incidence of attempted suicide according to CTQ scores of 5 to 12 (“none to moderate”) versus scores >12 (“moderate to extreme”) for each type of maltreatment. (Although these terminologies both included “moderate” severity of abuse, score groupings were mutually exclusive and score ranges were based on standardized cutoffs of the CTQ.26,27 Scores were dichotomized because of the high prevalence of low-moderate childhood maltreatment.16) Participants who attempted suicide were right-censored at the time of their first attempt; the remaining participants were right-censored at the time of their last follow-up visit. We compared survival distributions using the log-rank test.

Then, using Cox proportional hazards regression, we examined associations between the 5 types of maltreatment and suicide attempts in 5 separate models. We also generated a combined analysis in which we entered all types of maltreatment into the same model to identify the independent contributions of each. All multivariable analyses adjusted for age and gender on the basis of their known association with risk of suicide among youth.28,29 In addition, because previous studies of mortality among street youth have shown that death from drug overdose may be difficult to differentiate from suicide,4 we also adjusted for past-6-month injection drug use and drug overdose. Variables were time-updated.

Because the outcome of interest, suicide attempt, might have been associated with loss to follow-up (ie, informative censoring), we conducted separate analyses in which we generated models using inverse probability of censoring weights (IPCW) for comparison.30 IPCW analyses reweighted the sample such that the contribution of participants who did not return for follow-up was increased, thus generating effect estimates that would have been calculated if every participant had provided full follow-up. As described elsewhere,31,32 these analyses modeled the probability of remaining uncensored according to CTQ score and other study variables with the use of pooled logistic regression. We also linked to provincial registries to obtain information on deaths among participants lost to follow-up.

Finally, to examine the role of depressive symptoms as an intermediate in the pathway between childhood maltreatment and suicide attempts, we used the Sobel method to determine whether CES-D score mediated the relationship between each type of maltreatment and suicide attempts.33

Analyses were performed by using SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). All P values were 2-sided and tests were considered significant at P < .05.

Results

Of 660 eligible participants, 68.2% were male, 24.6% were Aboriginal, and 15.9% identified as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender, with a median age of 22 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 20–24 years) at baseline. A total of 320 (48.5%) participants reported having ever lived in an orphanage, a foster home, or a group home. Lifetime suicidal ideation was reported by 259 (39.2%) individuals.

Participants contributed 1841 person-years of total follow-up (median follow-up per participant: 26 months; IQR: 16–48 months; median visits: 4; IQR: 2–7). Provincial records revealed that 7 deaths were observed among those after their last follow-up visit; causes of death included 1 suicide and 1 overdose, and the cause was unclear in 5 cases. Suicide attempts were reported by 35 (5.3%) individuals during follow-up, resulting in a crude incidence density of 1.9 per 100 person-years (95% confidence interval: 1.4–2.6 per 100 person-years). Six participants reported >1 suicide attempt (median: 2; maximum: 4), resulting in a total of 44 attempts for the 35 participants reporting an attempt during follow-up. As shown in Table 1, individuals who reported a suicide attempt were more likely to have a CES-D score >21 at baseline but otherwise did not differ significantly on other characteristics.

TABLE 1.

Baseline Characteristics of 660 Street Youth Who Did and Did Not Attempt Suicide During Study Follow-up: ARYS (Vancouver, British Columbia; 2005–2013)

Characteristic Suicide Attempta
Yes (n = 35) No (n = 625) P
Median age, y (IQR) 21.5 (19.8–23.1) 21.8 (19.8–23.6) .518
Gender .747
 Male 23 (65.7) 427 (68.3)
 Female 12 (34.3) 198 (31.7)
Aboriginal ancestry .812
 Yes 8 (22.9) 154 (24.6)
 No 27 (77.1) 471 (75.4)
Lesbian/gay/bisexual/transgender .508
 Yes 7 (20.0) 98 (15.7)
 No 28 (80.0) 523 (83.7)
High school educationb .277
 Yes 9 (25.7) 215 (34.4)
 No 26 (74.3) 405 (64.8)
Homelessc .140
 Yes 29 (82.9) 443 (70.9)
 No 6 (17.1) 178 (28.5)
Use of outreach servicesc,d .252
 Yes 31 (88.6) 505 (80.8)
 No 4 (11.4) 120 (19.2)
Daily alcohol usec .639
 Yes 7 (20.0) 105 (16.8)
 No 28 (80.0) 515 (82.4)
Injection drug usec .445
 Yes 8 (22.9) 180 (28.8)
 No 27 (77.1) 444 (71.0)
Drug overdosec .105
 Yes 7 (20.0) 68 (10.9)
 No 28 (80.0) 552 (88.3)
Sex workc .554
 Yes 4 (11.4) 57 (9.1)
 No 31 (88.6) 568 (90.9)
CES-De score >21 .037
 Yes 19 (54.3) 213 (34.1)
 No 16 (45.7) 367 (58.7)

Data are presented as n (%) unless otherwise indicated; N = 660. Characteristics were reported at the time of study enrollment.

a

Cells do not uniformly add up to column totals due to missing values.

b

Previous completion of or current enrollment in high school.

c

During the preceding 6 months.

d

Street-based outreach services include outreach worker, street nurse, health van, home care worker/nurse, safe injection facility, or youth drop-in center.

e

CES-D scale using a standardized cutoff of >21.

Although every participant in the sample completed all or part of the CTQ, scores were missing for the sexual abuse subscale from 33 (5.0%) participants, for the physical abuse subscale from 23 (3.5%), for the emotional abuse subscale from 26 (3.9%), for the physical neglect subscale from 21 (3.2%), and for the emotional neglect subscale from 29 (4.4%). In addition, the CES-D scale was not fully completed by 45 (6.8%) participants. For both instruments, respondents did not differ from nonrespondents in terms of suicide attempts and all other variables (P > .05 for all). CTQ respondents did not differ from nonrespondents with regard to CES-D score (P > .05). Each of the CTQ subscales was correlated with one another (P < .001 for all pairs of subscales), with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.21 (sexual abuse and emotional neglect) to 0.49 (physical abuse and emotional abuse).

As shown in Table 2, increasing severity of childhood maltreatment was associated with attempting suicide for all types of maltreatment except for sexual abuse. The cumulative incidence of suicide attempts was significantly associated with all types of maltreatment examined separately (Fig 1 A, B, C, D, and E) and together (Fig 1F). As shown in Table 3, which lists crude and adjusted hazard ratios according to type of maltreatment, we observed a significantly elevated risk of suicide attempts among those reporting “moderate to extreme” physical abuse, emotional abuse, and emotional neglect but not among those reporting “moderate to extreme” sexual abuse or physical neglect. Effect sizes were comparable in IPCW models, which reweighted the sample to account for informative censoring (ie, to account for the possibility that those lost to follow-up were at greatest risk of suicide). In the combined model, which included all types of maltreatment in the same model, only physical abuse retained a statistically significant hazard ratio.

TABLE 2.

Associations of Childhood Maltreatment With Suicide Attempts During Follow-up: ARYS (Vancouver, British Columbia; 2005–2013)

Type of Maltreatment (CTQ Subscale Score)a Totalb (N = 660), n (%) Suicide Attempt, n (%)
Yes (n = 35) No (n = 625) Pc
Sexual abuse .062
 None to minimal (5–8) 476 (72.1) 22 (62.9) 454 (72.6)
 Low to moderate (9–12) 40 (6.1) 1 (2.9) 39 (6.2)
 Moderate to severe (13–15) 31 (4.7) 2 (5.7) 29 (4.6)
 Severe to extreme (>15) 80 (12.1) 8 (22.9) 72 (11.5)
Physical abuse <.001
 None to minimal (5–8) 345 (52.3) 9 (25.7) 336 (53.8)
 Low to moderate (9–12) 115 (17.4) 4 (11.4) 111 (17.8)
 Moderate to severe (13–15) 56 (8.5) 8 (22.9) 48 (7.7)
 Severe to extreme (>15) 121 (18.3) 13 (37.1) 108 (17.3)
Emotional abuse <.001
 None to minimal (5–8) 208 (31.5) 3 (8.6) 205 (32.8)
 Low to moderate (9–12) 128 (19.4) 4 (11.4) 124 (19.8)
 Moderate to severe (13–15) 98 (14.9) 8 (22.9) 90 (14.4)
 Severe to extreme (>15) 200 (30.3) 17 (48.6) 183 (29.3)
Physical neglect .013
 None to minimal (5–8) 300 (45.5) 10 (28.6) 290 (46.4)
 Low to moderate (9–12) 171 (25.9) 9 (25.7) 162 (25.9)
 Moderate to severe (13–15) 87 (13.2) 6 (17.1) 81 (13.0)
 Severe to extreme (>15) 81 (12.3) 8 (22.9) 73 (11.7)
Emotional neglect <.001
 None to minimal (5–8) 179 (27.1) 1 (2.9) 178 (28.5)
 Low to moderate (9–12) 171 (25.9) 6 (17.1) 165 (26.4)
 Moderate to severe (13–15) 104 (15.8) 11 (31.4) 93 (14.9)
 Severe to extreme (>15) 177 (26.8) 14 (40.0) 163 (26.1)

N = 660.

a

Categories used standardized cutoffs of the CTQ.26,27

b

Cells do not uniformly add up to column total due to missing values.

c

P values were obtained from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test for ordinal data.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Cumulative incidence of attempting suicide according to severity of sexual abuse (A), physical abuse (B), emotional abuse (C), physical neglect (D), emotional neglect (E), and any type of abuse/neglect (F): ARYS (Vancouver, British Columbia; 2005–2013). N = 660. Although both groupings listed (“moderate to severe abuse,” “none to moderate abuse”) include “moderate” levels of abuse, categories used standardized cutoffs of the CTQ and score ranges were mutually exclusive.26,27 Categories were collapsed with “none to moderate” (score of 5–12) incorporating “none to minimal” (score of 5–8) combined with “low to moderate” (score of 9–12), and “moderate to severe” (score >12) incorporating “moderate to severe” (score of 13–15) combined with “severe to extreme” (score >15). Where totals do not add to 660 at time zero, values are missing because the participant elected not to complete the CTQ at the baseline visit.

TABLE 3.

Crude and Adjusted Hazard Ratios for Attempting Suicide: ARYS (Vancouver, British Columbia; 2005–2013)

Type of Maltreatmenta Crude Hazard Ratio (95% CI) Adjusted Hazard Ratiob (95% CI)
Standard Model IPCW Model Combined Model
Sexual abuse 1.71 (0.80–3.64) 1.63 (0.70–3.78) 1.43 (0.58–3.55) 1.00 (0.43–2.34)
Physical abuse 4.62 (2.20–9.71) 4.47 (2.12–9.42) 5.09 (2.27–11.4) 2.74 (1.03–7.28)
Emotional abuse 4.66 (1.93–11.2) 4.92 (2.11–11.5) 4.45 (1.82–10.9) 2.52 (0.88–7.25)
Physical neglect 1.84 (0.89–3.82) 1.70 (0.80–3.59) 1.88 (0.84–4.19) 0.76 (0.36–1.60)
Emotional neglect 3.36 (1.28–8.81) 3.08 (1.05–9.03) 2.95 (1.02–8.54) 1.42 (0.40–5.06)

N = 660.

a

Categories used standardized cutoffs of the CTQ and were collapsed with “none to moderate” (score of 5–12; reference group) incorporating “none to minimal” (score of 5–8) combined with “low to moderate” (score of 9–12), and “moderate to severe” (score >12; comparison) incorporating “moderate to severe” (score of 13–15) combined with “severe to extreme” (score >15).26,27

b

Standard and IPCW models include the type of abuse/neglect listed (and no other), adjusted for age, gender, past-6-month injection drug use, and past-6-month drug overdose. IPCW models reweighted the sample to inflate the contribution of participants lost to follow-up, thus accounting for the possibility that those who did not return for full follow-up may have been at elevated risk of suicide. The combined model included all 5 types of abuse/neglect in same model without IPCW (and additionally adjusted for age, gender, past-6-month injection drug use, and past-6-month drug overdose).

CES-D score did not appear to mediate the relationship between statistically significant forms of maltreatment and suicide attempts. Sobel test statistics for mediation by CES-D scores >21 were as follows: physical abuse, 1.75 (P = .080); emotional abuse, 1.77 (P = .077); and emotional neglect, 1.55 (P = .122).

Discussion

In this prospective cohort study in street youth, we observed a high incidence of self-reported attempted suicide, with >1 in 20 youth reporting an attempt over the 7-year study period. History of childhood maltreatment was strongly associated with risk of attempted suicide, with youth who reported previous physical abuse, emotional abuse, or emotional neglect 3 to nearly 5 times as likely to report attempting suicide. Among the 5 types of self-reported childhood maltreatment examined in a combined model, only physical abuse retained an independent effect on risk of attempted suicide.

To date, most studies on suicidality and childhood maltreatment have focused on adult drug users in clinic-based samples and have used a cross-sectional design.13,14,34 Our study is novel in examining a longitudinal cohort of community-recruited street youth. Although we observed a high frequency of attempted suicide in our sample, studies reveal that attempted suicide is alarmingly common throughout the general adolescent population. The 2013 Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance Study of US high school students estimated the past-year prevalence of attempted suicide to be 8% (girls: 11%; boys: 5%).35 In British Columbia, the estimated past-year prevalence of attempted suicide in the general adolescent population in 2013 was 6% (girls: 9%; boys: 3%). Despite the similar prevalence of attempted suicide among street youth and the general adolescent population, the most common methods used among street youth are especially deadly and include wrist slitting, intentional drug overdose, and hanging.36

Lifetime suicidal ideation was reported by 39% of participants in our study, a prevalence >3 times that reported by the National Comorbidity Survey of adolescents in the United States.37 This elevated prevalence in part reflects the higher median age in our study sample, because suicidality generally increases as adolescence progresses to early adulthood.1,2,28 In any case, estimates of lifetime suicidal ideation among adults in the general population are one-third that found in the street youth in our study, and factors such as childhood maltreatment are likely critical contributors.38,39

Our results extend those from cross-sectional studies in clinic-based adult drug users.13,14,34 Our results also build on findings from a recent longitudinal study of community-recruited adult drug users in Vancouver showing elevated risk of attempted suicide after childhood maltreatment.16 What is less clear among these studies is which types of childhood maltreatment confer the greatest risk. In studies examining multiple types of maltreatment, results often suggest that sexual abuse shows the strongest association with suicidality.15,34 In our sample, sexual abuse was associated with increased cumulative incidence of attempted suicide but was not significant in Cox regression models. Sexual abuse was the least common form of childhood maltreatment reported in our study, although we cannot exclude that participants may have felt uncomfortable disclosing such experiences.

Nonetheless, our study builds on previous studies by including less studied forms such as emotional abuse and physical and emotional neglect. Although less researched, emotional abuse has shown a strong association with suicidality in studies in which it has been examined.16,34 In our study, emotional abuse was reported to have co-occurred in nearly half of all participants also reporting physical abuse, and emotional neglect was similarly comorbid. Because physical abuse was the only type of maltreatment to maintain an independent effect in a combined model, some of the harm of emotional abuse and neglect may be due to physical abuse that youth experience simultaneously.

The underlying mechanisms linking childhood maltreatment to suicide require further study. Although our data did not support a mediating role for depressive symptoms, childhood maltreatment and suicidality are both linked to depression, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorders, and posttraumatic stress disorder.37,40 Such psychiatric conditions, many of which are prevalent among street youth, may result from childhood maltreatment and subsequently predispose to suicidality.3,6,41 Prolonged street involvement is also likely detrimental to the mental health of youth.42 Homelessness is an independent predictor of substance use.43 Both homelessness and substance use are harmful yet common aspects of street life,5,44,45 and both are associated with suicidality.46,47 Qualitative research shows that homelessness, substance use, and adverse childhood experiences converge on feelings of hopelessness and of being “trapped,” which contribute to suicide among street youth.48

Regardless of mechanism, previous work suggests that to deliver effective, trauma-informed suicide treatment and prevention to street youth, providers should understand that the impact of childhood maltreatment is far-reaching and influences child and adolescent development and coping strategies.49,50 Street youth providers should ensure a physically and emotionally safe treatment environment to avoid retraumatization and, in delivering services, decrease hierarchical approaches and empower youth to collaborate in their own care.49,51

Limitations of our study include the reliance on self-report, which may have been subject to recall bias. Participants may have been reluctant to disclose traumatic experiences, suicide attempts, or other risk behaviors. Moreover, distinguishing suicide from drug overdose may be difficult, particularly because overdose is a common method of suicide.4,8,13 To account for this possibility, we trained nurse interviewers to distinguish between overdose and suicide and adjusted for co-occurring injection drug use and recent overdose in our analyses. In addition, we studied childhood maltreatment and did not ascertain ongoing, street-based abuse, which may have contributed to the risk of attempted suicide.52 Conversely, we cannot rule out that ongoing contact with research staff and referrals to mental health services for high-risk participants reduced suicidality.

Conclusions

Our findings reveal an elevated risk of suicide attempts among street youth with a history of childhood maltreatment compared with those without this history. These results build on preexisting research by specifically examining the harms of other, less studied forms of maltreatment, including emotional abuse and physical and emotional neglect. Additional studies are needed to show the mechanistic pathways and to identify protective factors. Nonetheless, the high prevalence of self-reported childhood maltreatment among street youth in this setting demonstrates the importance of delivering suicide prevention services from a trauma-informed perspective.

Acknowledgments

We thank the study participants for their contribution to the research, as well as current and past researchers and staff. We specifically thank Ms Sabina Dobrer, Mr Cody Callon, Ms Jennifer Matthews, Ms Deborah Graham, Mr Peter Vann, Mr Steve Kain, Ms Kristie Starr, Ms Tricia Collingham, and Ms Carmen Rock for their research and administrative assistance. We also appreciate the support of Drs S. Jean Emans, Elizabeth R. Woods, and Sarah A.B. Pitts and the Division of Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine at Boston Children’s Hospital.

Glossary

ARYS

At Risk Youth Study

CES-D

Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression

CTQ

Childhood Trauma Questionnaire

IPCW

inverse probability of censoring weights

IQR

interquartile range

Footnotes

Dr Hadland designed the study, wrote the protocol, conducted the literature review, provided input for statistical analyses, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript; Dr Wood designed the study, wrote the protocol, provided input for statistical analyses, contributed to the first draft of the manuscript, and contributed to the final manuscript; Ms Dong undertook data management and statistical analyses, contributed to the first draft of the manuscript, and contributed to the final manuscript; Dr Marshall designed the study, wrote the protocol, provided input for statistical analyses, and contributed to the final manuscript; Drs Kerr and Montaner designed the study, wrote the protocol, and contributed to the final manuscript; Dr DeBeck designed the study, wrote the protocol, aided with the literature review, provided input for statistical analyses, and contributed to the first draft of the manuscript; and all authors approved the final manuscript as submitted.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: As an HIV physician, Dr Montaner has received limited unrestricted funding, paid to his institution, from Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Merck, and ViiV Healthcare; the other authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.

FUNDING: Supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) grants R01DA028532 and U01DA038886 as well as the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) operating grant MOP-102742. In addition, Dr Hadland is supported by the Maternal and Child Health/Health Resources and Services Administration Leadership Education in Adolescent Health Training Program (T71 MC00009) and by a National Research Service Award from NIH/National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (1T32 HD075727). Dr Wood is supported by the Canada Research Chairs program through a Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Inner City Medicine. Dr Marshall is supported by NIH/NIDA grant R03 DA037770. Dr Montaner is supported by the British Columbia Ministry of Health and by NIH/NIDA grant R01DA036307. Dr DeBeck is supported by a Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research/St Paul's Hospital/Providence Health Care Career Scholar Award and a CIHR New Investigator Award. Funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  • 1.Johnson NB, Hayes LD, Brown K, Hoo EC, Ethier KA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CDC National Health Report: leading causes of morbidity and mortality and associated behavioral risk and protective factors—United States, 2005-2013. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014;63(suppl 4):3–27 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Statistics Canada. The 10 leading causes of death, 2011. Available at: www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/82-625-x/2014001/article/11896-eng.htm. Accessed December 3, 2014
  • 3.Public Health Agency of Canada. Street youth in Canada: findings from the enhanced surveillance of Canadian street youth, 1999-2003. 2006. Available at: www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/std-mts/reports_06/pdf/street_youth_e.pdf. Accessed December 3, 2014
  • 4.Roy E, Haley N, Leclerc P, Sochanski B, Boudreau JF, Boivin JF. Mortality in a cohort of street youth in Montreal. JAMA. 2004;292(5):569–574 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Greene JM, Ennett ST, Ringwalt CL. Substance use among runaway and homeless youth in three national samples. Am J Public Health. 1997;87(2):229–235 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Boivin JF, Roy E, Haley N, Galbaud du Fort G. The health of street youth: a Canadian perspective. Can J Public Health. 2005;96(6):432–437 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Marshall BDL, Galea S, Wood E, Kerr T. Injection methamphetamine use is associated with an increased risk of attempted suicide: a prospective cohort study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011;119(1–2):134–137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bohnert AS, Roeder K, Ilgen MA. Unintentional overdose and suicide among substance users: a review of overlap and risk factors. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010;110(3):183–192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wilcox HC, Conner KR, Caine ED. Association of alcohol and drug use disorders and completed suicide: an empirical review of cohort studies. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004;76(suppl):S11–S19 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rohde P, Noell J, Ochs L, Seeley JR. Depression, suicidal ideation and STD-related risk in homeless older adolescents. J Adolesc. 2001;24(4):447–460 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 11.Ompad DC, Ikeda RM, Shah N, et al. Childhood sexual abuse and age at initiation of injection drug use. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(4):703–709 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 12.Dube SR, Felitti VJ, Dong M, Chapman DP, Giles WH, Anda RF. Childhood abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction and the risk of illicit drug use: the adverse childhood experiences study. Pediatrics. 2003;111(3):564–572 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bohnert ASB, Roeder KM, Ilgen MA. Suicide attempts and overdoses among adults entering addictions treatment: comparing correlates in a U.S. National Study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011;119(1–2):106–112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Roy A. Risk factors for attempting suicide in heroin addicts. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2010;40(4):416–420 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Brown J, Cohen P, Johnson JG, Smailes EM. Childhood abuse and neglect: specificity of effects on adolescent and young adult depression and suicidality. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1999;38(12):1490–1496 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Marshall BDL, Galea S, Wood E, Kerr T. Longitudinal associations between types of childhood trauma and suicidal behavior among substance users: a cohort study. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(9):e69–e75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Feldmann J, Middleman AB. Homeless adolescents: common clinical concerns. Semin Pediatr Infect Dis. 2003;14(1):6–11 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 18.Wood E, Stoltz JA, Montaner JSG, Kerr T. Evaluating methamphetamine use and risks of injection initiation among street youth: the ARYS study. Harm Reduct J. 2006;3:18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fischer B, Rehm J, Hall W. Cannabis use in Canada: the need for a ‘public health’ approach. Can J Public Health. 2009;100(2):101–103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.DeMatteo D, Major C, Block B, et al. Toronto street youth and HIV/AIDS: prevalence, demographics, and risks. J Adolesc Health. 1999;25(5):358–366 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 21.Kerr T, Marshall BD, Miller C, et al. Injection drug use among street-involved youth in a Canadian setting. BMC Public Health. 2009;9(171):171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Radloff LS. The use of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale in adolescents and young adults. J Youth Adolesc. 1991;20(2):149–166 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1(3):385–401 [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Scher CD, Stein MB, Asmundson GJ, McCreary DR, Forde DR. The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire in a community sample: psychometric properties and normative data. J Trauma Stress. 2001;14(4):843–857 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Forde DR, Baron SW, Scher CD, Stein MB. Factor structure and reliability of the childhood trauma questionnaire and prevalence estimates of trauma for male and female street youth. J Interpers Violence. 2012;27(2):364–379 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bernstein DP, Fink L. Childhood Trauma Questionnaire: A Retrospective Self-report Manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1998 [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bernstein DP, Stein JA, Newcomb MD, et al. Development and validation of a brief screening version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. Child Abuse Negl. 2003;27(2):169–190 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hallfors DD, Waller MW, Ford CA, Halpern CT, Brodish PH, Iritani B. Adolescent depression and suicide risk: association with sex and drug behavior. Am J Prev Med. 2004;27(3):224–231 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Skinner R, McFaull S. Suicide among children and adolescents in Canada: trends and sex differences, 1980-2008. CMAJ. 2012;184(9):1029–1034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Robins JM. Information recovery and bias adjustment in proportional hazards regression analysis of randomized trials using surrogate markers. Proceedings of the Biopharmaceutical Section, American Statistical Association. 1993: 22–33 [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cain LE, Cole SR. Inverse probability-of-censoring weights for the correction of time-varying noncompliance in the effect of randomized highly active antiretroviral therapy on incident AIDS or death. Stat Med. 2009;28(12):1725–1738 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Robins JM, Finkelstein DM. Correcting for noncompliance and dependent censoring in an AIDS clinical trial with inverse probability of censoring weighted (IPCW) log-rank tests. Biometrics. 2000;56(3):779–788 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sobel ME. Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In: Leinhardt S, ed. Sociological Methodology. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1982:290–312 [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lloyd JJ, Ricketts EP, Havens JR, et al. The relationship between lifetime abuse and suicidal ideation in a sample of injection drug users. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2007;39(2):159–166 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kann L, Kinchen S, Shanklin SL, et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2013. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014;63(suppl 4):1–168 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yoder KA. Comparing suicide attempters, suicide ideators, and nonsuicidal homeless and runaway adolescents. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 1999;29(1):25–36 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nock MK, Green JG, Hwang I, et al. Prevalence, correlates, and treatment of lifetime suicidal behavior among adolescents: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication Adolescent Supplement. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70(3):300–310 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kessler RC, Berglund P, Borges G, Nock M, Wang PS. Trends in suicide ideation, plans, gestures, and attempts in the United States, 1990-1992 to 2001-2003. JAMA. 2005;293(20):2487–2495 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kessler RC, Borges G, Walters EE. Prevalence of and risk factors for lifetime suicide attempts in the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56(7):617–626 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Green JG, McLaughlin KA, Berglund PA, et al. Childhood adversities and adult psychiatric disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication I: associations with first onset of DSM-IV disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010;67(2):113–123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kelly K, Caputo T. Health and street/homeless youth. J Health Psychol. 2007;12(5):726–736 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 42.Karabanow J. Getting off the street: exploring the processes of young people’s street exits. Am Behav Sci. 2008;51(6):772–788 [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Feng C, DeBeck K, Kerr T, Mathias S, Montaner J, Wood E. Homelessness independently predicts injection drug use initiation among street-involved youth in a Canadian setting. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52(4):499–501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Fazel S, Khosla V, Doll H, Geddes J. The prevalence of mental disorders among the homeless in Western countries: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. PLoS Med. 2008;5(12):e225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hwang SW. Homelessness and health. CMAJ. 2001;164(2):229–233 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Eynan R, Langley J, Tolomiczenko G, et al. The association between homelessness and suicidal ideation and behaviors: results of a cross-sectional survey. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2002;32(4):418–427 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Greene JM, Ringwalt CL. Youth and familial substance use’s association with suicide attempts among runaway and homeless youth. Subst Use Misuse. 1996;31(8):1041–1058 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kidd SA. “The walls were closing in, and we were trapped”: a qualitative analysis of street youth suicide. Youth Soc. 2004;36(1):30–55 [Google Scholar]
  • 49.McKenzie-Mohr S, Coates J, McLeod H. Responding to the needs of youth who are homeless: calling for politicized trauma-informed intervention. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2012;34(1):136–143 [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Prescott L, Soares P, Konnath K, Bassuk E. A Long Journey Home: A Guide for Creating Trauma-Informed Services for Mothers and Children Experiencing Homelessness Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration 2008. Available at: http://homeless.samhsa.gov/ResourceFiles/ALongJourneyHome.pdf. Accessed May 28, 2015
  • 51.Elliott DE, Bjelajac P, Fallot RD, Markoff LS, Reed BG. Trauma‐informed or trauma‐denied: principles and implementation of trauma‐informed services for women. J Community Psychol. 2005;33(4):461–477 [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Goodman L, Saxe L, Harvey M. Homelessness as psychological trauma: broadening perspectives. Am Psychol. 1991;46(11):1219–1225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Pediatrics are provided here courtesy of American Academy of Pediatrics

RESOURCES