Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2015 Jan 1;201(9):851–856. doi: 10.1007/s00359-014-0975-2

How can motor systems retain performance over a wide temperature range? Lessons from the crustacean stomatogastric nervous system

Eve Marder 1, Sara A Haddad 1, Marie L Goeritz 1,, Philipp Rosenbaum 1, Tilman Kispersky 1
PMCID: PMC4552768  PMID: 25552317

Abstract

Marine invertebrates, such as lobsters and crabs, deal with a widely and wildly fluctuating temperature environment. Here, we describe the effects of changing temperature on the motor patterns generated by the stomatogastric nervous system of the crab, Cancer borealis. Over a broad range of “permissive” temperatures, the pyloric rhythm increases in frequency but maintains its characteristic phase relationships. Nonetheless, at more extreme high temperatures, the normal triphasic pyloric rhythm breaks down, or “crashes”. We present both experimental and computational approaches to understanding the stability of both single neurons and networks to temperature perturbations, and discuss data that shows that the “crash” temperatures themselves may be environmentally regulated. These approaches provide insight into how the nervous system can be stable to a global perturbation, such as temperature, in spite of the fact that all biological processes are temperature dependent.

Keywords: Crustaceans, Q10, Acclimation, Stomatogastric ganglion, Cancer borealis, Crabs, Neuromodulation, Pyloric rhythm

Introduction

Ambient temperature influences all living organisms, but none more than long-lived marine crustaceans. Temperatures in the north Atlantic Ocean, where the lobster, Homarus americanus and the crab, Cancer borealis, live, routinely fluctuate from below 4 °C to more than 25 °C (Factor 1995; Crossin et al. 1998; Camacho et al. 2006). Moreover, these animals can experience substantial temperature swings in very short times as a consequence of tides, currents, and storms. For those of us who use wild-caught marine crustaceans as experimental systems, it is important to understand the environmental challenges they face, as well as to appreciate that they also show temperature preferences that can contribute to where they choose to live (Krediet and Donahue 2009; Lewis and Ayers 2014).

Temperature is a global perturbation that influences all biological processes, to a greater or lesser degree. Biologists often express the temperature dependence of a specific process by calculating the Q 10, the factor by which a process increases for every 10 °C increase in temperature. A Q 10 = 1 characterizes a process that is essentially temperature invariant. Many biological processes, including most voltage-gated ion channels, have activation and inactivation rates with Q 10s in the 2–3 range, while the ion channels that are thought important for temperature sensing may have Q 10s as high as 50 or 100 (Garrity et al. 2010; Clapham and Miller 2011; Kang et al. 2012).

Importantly, if all of the component processes that govern a system’s behavior have identical Q 10’s, the process will be temperature compensated (Robertson and Money 2012). For example, if all of the Q 10s that control the activation and inactivation kinetics of the ion channels contributing to action potential generation are the same, then the action potential waveform will be maintained as temperature is changed (although the frequency may change). However, as the Q 10 describes an exponential function, a relatively modest difference in the Q 10s for two processes can nonetheless become quite significant in response to even a modest temperature perturbation. In this case, maintaining constant performance over a considerable temperature range becomes a non-trivial problem (Tang et al. 2010, 2012; Caplan et al. 2014), and there are relatively few combinations of conductance densities and Q 10s that allow a neuron to function over a range of temperatures (Wechselberger et al. 2006; Rinberg et al. 2013; Caplan et al. 2014; Roemschied et al. 2014). At the same time, sensory and motor function often depends on relative temperature invariance (Tang et al. 2010; Roemschied et al. 2014; Soofi et al. 2014), so it becomes a challenge to understand how physiological performance can be preserved despite the fact that all the components of circuits in behavior are altered differentially by temperature.

The effects of temperature on the crab pyloric rhythm

The effects of acute temperature change on the triphasic pyloric rhythm have been studied both in vivo (Soofi et al. 2014) and in vitro (Tang et al. 2010, 2012). In both cases, the frequency of the pyloric rhythm increases as the temperature increases over a permissive range, while the phase relationships, or the relative timing, among the component neurons are maintained (Tang et al. 2010). In considering motor systems, it is clear that phase maintenance is critical for appropriate movements, which result from muscle groups being activated in the correct order. The problem of maintaining phase despite changes in frequency has attracted a great deal of attention precisely because it requires understanding how biophysical processes which would tend to produce fixed delays can be combined instead to produce fixed phases (Harris-Warrick et al. 1995a, b; Hooper 1997a, b; Manor et al. 2003; Bucher et al. 2005; Marder and Bucher 2007; Goaillard et al. 2009).

The pacemaker kernel of the pyloric rhythm consists of the 2 PD neurons and a single AB neuron, which are tightly electrically coupled and are synchronously active (Marder and Bucher 2007). Rinberg et al. (2013) pharmacologically isolated the pacemaker kernel and then characterized the effects of temperature. As expected, as temperature was increased, the frequency of the pacemaker oscillation increased. Unexpectedly, the duty cycle of the pacemaker kernel remained virtually constant over a large range of temperatures (Rinberg et al. 2013). This result goes a long way to explain the compensation of phase over temperature previously reported (Tang et al. 2010), because the pacemaker kernel will provide rhythmic inhibition whose duration changes as the period changes. The response of the follower LP and PY neurons to rhythmic inhibitory drive depends on the strength and time course of the inhibition they receive (Eisen and Marder 1982; Rabbah and Nadim 2007) as well as the properties of IA and IH in the follower neurons (Hartline and Gassie 1979; Harris-Warrick et al. 1995b). All of these three processes are temperature dependent, with somewhat different Q 10s (Tang et al. 2010). Nonetheless, they balance well enough to maintain a constant phase (Tang et al. 2010).

As the temperature is increased beyond the permissive range, the preparations “crash” or lose their ability to maintain robust triphasic rhythms (Tang et al. 2012). Pyloric rhythm crashes can be reversible (Tang et al. 2012). Figure 1 shows intracellular recordings of the PD and LP neurons and an extracellular recording of the lateral ventricular nerve (lvn, which also shows activity of the PY neurons), first at 11 °C, then at 31 °C, and then back at 11 °C. Note the normal alternation of the LP, PY, and PD neurons at low temperatures, and then the disruption of the rhythm at 31 °C, associated with loss of PD neuron activity, almost complete loss of LP neuron activity, but continued tonic firing in the PY neuron.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Extreme temperature “crashes” the pyloric rhythm. Example intracellular (top LP and PD) and extracellular (bottom lvn) traces from a preparation at 11 °C (stable rhythm), 31 °C (network crash) and then back to 11 °C (recovery of a stable rhythm)

Detailed analyses of high-temperature crashes using spectral analyses (Tang et al. 2012) show that individual preparations respond similarly to temperature changes in the permissive range, but crash differently at more extreme temperatures, as was predicted from studies that showed variability in network components (Golowasch et al. 1999; Goldman et al. 2001; Marder and Goaillard 2006; Schulz et al. 2006, 2007; Goaillard et al. 2009; Marder 2011).

How do isolated neurons crash?

In considering how the pyloric rhythm crashes at high temperatures, we were curious to determine how each component of the pyloric rhythm responds to extreme temperatures. At high temperatures, the isolated pacemaker kernels crashed (Rinberg et al. 2013), but each preparation showed different crash dynamics. Again, the behavior of the isolated pacemaker kernels was robust over a large permissive temperature range, but showed the effect of their underlying differences in conductance parameters as the oscillators made different transitions when they lost their ability to oscillate (Rinberg et al. 2013).

When the circuit was intact, in many preparations it appeared that the LP neuron was often the first neuron to become silent or highly irregular at high temperature (Tang et al. 2012). Consequently, we decided to pharmacologically isolate the LP neuron and study the effects of temperature on it. The results of one such experiment are shown in Fig. 2a. The top trace, labeled control, shows an intracellular recording of the LP neuron in the intact network. Subsequently, the preparation was placed in picrotoxin to block the glutamatergic inputs to the LP neuron from the AB and PY neurons (Marder and Eisen 1984). The second trace in Fig. 2 shows the absence of large IPSPs in comparison to the control, but that the LP neuron was still firing rhythmically, most likely because of a small inhibitory input remaining from the cholinergic PD neurons (Marder and Eisen 1984). As the temperature was further increased, the LP neuron started generating very long bursts and eventually stopped firing action potentials. Figure 2b shows the pooled data from 15 LP neurons as a function of temperature. Note the individual variation in the effect of temperature on firing rate. Most neurons increased in firing frequency as temperature was raised from 11 to 23 °C, but as the temperature was increased further many of them decreased or stopped firing. The effect of temperature on the coefficient of variation of the firing rate demonstrates clearly that as the temperature reaches 27 °C, the neuronal activity patterns become highly variable, again as would be expected given the variable conductance densities of the LP neurons’ voltage-gated currents (Schulz et al. 2006; Goaillard et al. 2009).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Effect of temperature on the activity of isolated LP neurons. a Example traces from one LP neuron. Control, LP is active in the intact network. After applying picrotoxin (PTX), glutamatergic connections to AB and PY are blocked and some residual PD inhibition is left. With increasing temperature, LP spike frequency increases and pauses between LP bursts become larger. At 34 °C LP “crashes”. b Firing rate in isolated LP neurons increases with increasing temperature. At 23 °C individual frequencies become more variable due to crashes. The coefficient of variation (ratio between the standard deviation and the mean of the spike frequency) increases at higher temperatures, due to variable spiking patterns in individual LP neurons. N = 15 LP neurons; each color represents one LP neuron

Temperature acclimation of the pyloric rhythm

There is an enormous literature that demonstrates that animals acclimate to extended periods of time at different temperatures (Lehtikoivunen and Kivivuori 1994; Camacho et al. 2006; Robertson and Money 2012; Tang et al. 2012). We acclimated crabs for 3–4 weeks to low and high temperatures and found little change in the response to acute temperature ramps of in vitro preparations in the permissive temperature range, but found that preparations from warm-acclimated animals required higher temperatures to “crash” the pyloric rhythm (Tang et al. 2012).

The winter of 2011–2012 was unusually warm and ocean temperatures in the waters from which our animals were collected were 6–8 °C warmer than normal, thus creating a natural acclimation period of many months. Preparations from animals that had lived for extended periods of time in the ocean at much warmer temperatures than usual showed remarkable behavior in response to temperature. Figure 3a shows recordings of the pyloric rhythm in response to acute temperature changes. Note that the frequency of the pyloric rhythm at low temperatures is entirely normal. But, as the temperature reached 31 °C, the frequency was almost 5 Hz, and at 35 °C, it reached almost 7 Hz (Fig. 3a). These frequencies are far greater than we had ever seen previously. Finally, at 36–37 °C, the pyloric rhythm crashed, but at a much higher temperature than we had ever seen in previous years. Data from four preparations from this group of crabs that had over-wintered in warm waters are summarized in Fig. 3b, c, and show the unusually high frequencies and crash points for these animals. Thus, we conclude that an extended period of time at higher than usual winter water temperatures had shifted upwards the temperature tolerance of the animals. (We should note that in the two subsequent years, the typical crash temperatures returned to lower values.)

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Unusually warm winter ocean temperatures alter the crash point of in vitro preparations. a Example extracellular traces from the lvn of a preparation at indicated temperatures. The network reached a pyloric frequency of 7 Hz at 35 °C and then crashed at 36 °C. b Cumulative data from four preparations showing the highest recorded frequency before network crash. c The temperatures at which the networks crashed from the same preparations

Crustacean neuromuscular junctions are notoriously temperature sensitive (Stephens and Atwood 1982), with muscle tension and contraction compromised with temperature increase (Hamilton et al. 2007; Thuma et al. 2013). Interestingly, circulating neuromodulators, such as dopamine and serotonin, may play a role in vivo to compensate for the potential loss of function at high temperature (Hamilton et al. 2007; Thuma et al. 2013).

Therefore, we were curious to compare directly the effect of temperature on pyloric rhythms recorded both in vivo with implanted electrodes with results from dissected preparations in vitro (Soofi et al. 2014). At the same temperature, the in vitro recorded motor patterns were faster than what was seen in vivo from the same animal. The steeper temperature dependence of the pyloric rhythm frequency in the in vitro preparations when compared to the in vivo preparations suggests that sensory feedback may reduce the overall effect of high temperature on pyloric rhythm frequency in vivo (Soofi et al. 2014).

Because the pyloric rhythm frequencies recorded in vivo at high temperature appeared somewhat lower than those produced by the same animals after dissection and in vitro recordings, we were curious to examine the effects of temperature acclimation on the motor patterns recorded in vivo after the animals had been acclimated to higher temperatures for at least 1 month. Figure 4a shows a comparison of the motor pattern recorded at 24 °C from implanted electrodes in animals that had been acclimated for 4 weeks to 11 and 19 °C, respectively. Figure 4b shows that warm-acclimated animals became less sensitive to acute temperature increases in the permissive range. This may be physiologically advantageous, as muscle contraction is more likely to follow the motor pattern discharge when the pyloric rhythm frequency is less than 2 Hz (Morris and Hooper 1997, 1998, 2001), although it would be interesting to see how long-term acclimation changes the properties of the neuromuscular junctions of the pyloric muscles.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Comparison of pyloric motor patterns recorded in vivo in animals acclimated to different temperatures. a Pyloric rhythms recorded at 24 °C in animals that had been acclimated to 11 °C (top) and 19 °C (bottom), recorded with an implanted extracellular electrode. b Pooled and binned data from in vivo recordings in seven cold-acclimated and four warm-acclimated animals. Warm-acclimated animals responded with a significantly shallower increase in frequencies as a function of temperature elevation (two-way ANOVA, p < 0.01)

Conclusions

Maintaining a robust pyloric rhythm over a wide temperature range requires that many biophysical, biochemical, and molecular processes have temperature dependencies that collectively preserve the important features of circuit function. While this is difficult to achieve when building computational models (Caplan et al. 2014), there must be many, yet to be discovered, biological rules that allow developing and growing animals to find sets of network parameters that allow them to retain stable circuit function in a temperature-fluctuating ocean.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by RO1 NS 081013 to E.M.

References

  1. Bucher D, Prinz AA, Marder E. Animal-to-animal variability in motor pattern production in adults and during growth. J Neurosci. 2005;25:1611–1619. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3679-04.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Camacho J, Qadri SA, Wang H, Worden MK. Temperature acclimation alters cardiac performance in the lobster Homarus americanus. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2006;192:1327–1334. doi: 10.1007/s00359-006-0162-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Caplan JS, Williams AH, Marder E. Many parameter sets in a multicompartment model oscillator are robust to temperature perturbations. J Neurosci. 2014;34:4963–4975. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0280-14.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clapham DE, Miller C. A thermodynamic framework for understanding temperature sensing by transient receptor potential (TRP) channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:19492–19497. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117485108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Crossin G, Al-Ayoub S, Jury S, Howell W. Behavioral thermoregulation in the American lobster Homarus americanus. J Exp Biol. 1998;201:365–374. doi: 10.1242/jeb.201.3.365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Eisen JS, Marder E. Mechanisms underlying pattern generation in lobster stomatogastric ganglion as determined by selective inactivation of identified neurons. III. Synaptic connections of electrically coupled pyloric neurons. J Neurophysiol. 1982;48:1392–1415. doi: 10.1152/jn.1982.48.6.1392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Factor JR, editor. Biology of the lobster, Homarus americanus. San Diego: Academic Press; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  8. Garrity PA, Goodman MB, Samuel AD, Sengupta P. Running hot and cold: behavioral strategies, neural circuits, and the molecular machinery for thermotaxis in C. elegans and Drosophila. Genes Dev. 2010;24:2365–2382. doi: 10.1101/gad.1953710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Goaillard JM, Taylor AL, Schulz DJ, Marder E. Functional consequences of animal-to-animal variation in circuit parameters. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12:1424–1430. doi: 10.1038/nn.2404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Goldman MS, Golowasch J, Marder E, Abbott LF. Global structure, robustness, and modulation of neuronal models. J Neurosci. 2001;21:5229–5238. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-14-05229.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Golowasch J, Abbott LF, Marder E. Activity-dependent regulation of potassium currents in an identified neuron of the stomatogastric ganglion of the crab Cancer borealis. J Neurosci. 1999;19:RC33. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-20-j0004.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hamilton JL, Edwards CR, Holt SR, Worden MK. Temperature dependent modulation of lobster neuromuscular properties by serotonin. J Exp Biol. 2007;210:1025–1035. doi: 10.1242/jeb.02717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Harris-Warrick RM, Coniglio LM, Barazangi N, Guckenheimer J, Gueron S. Dopamine modulation of transient potassium current evokes phase shifts in a central pattern generator network. J Neurosci. 1995;15:342–358. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-01-00342.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Harris-Warrick RM, Coniglio LM, Levini RM, Gueron S, Guckenheimer J. Dopamine modulation of two subthreshold currents produces phase shifts in activity of an identified motoneuron. J Neurophysiol. 1995;74:1404–1420. doi: 10.1152/jn.1995.74.4.1404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hartline DK, Gassie DV., Jr Pattern generation in the lobster (Panulirus) stomatogastric ganglion. I. Pyloric neuron kinetics and synaptic interactions. Biol Cybern. 1979;33:209–222. doi: 10.1007/BF00337410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hooper SL. Phase maintenance in the pyloric pattern of the lobster (Panulirus interruptus) stomatogastric ganglion. J Comput Neurosci. 1997;4:191–205. doi: 10.1023/A:1008822218061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hooper SL. The pyloric pattern of the lobster (Panulirus interruptus) stomatogastric ganglion comprises two phase-maintaining subsets. J Comput Neurosci. 1997;4:207–219. doi: 10.1023/A:1008867702131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kang K, Panzano VC, Chang EC, Ni L, Dainis AM, Jenkins AM, Regna K, Muskavitch MA, Garrity PA. Modulation of TRPA1 thermal sensitivity enables sensory discrimination in Drosophila. Nature. 2012;481:76–80. doi: 10.1038/nature10715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Krediet CJ, Donahue MJ. Growth-mortality trade-offs along a depth gradient in Cancer borealis. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2009;373:133–139. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2009.04.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lehtikoivunen SM, Kivivuori LA. Effect of temperature-acclimation in the crayfish Astacus-Astacus L on the locomotor-activity during a cyclic temperature-change. J Therm Biol. 1994;19:299–304. doi: 10.1016/0306-4565(94)90065-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lewis L, Ayers J. Temperature preference and acclimation in the Jonah Crab, Cancer borealis. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2014;455:7–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2014.02.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Manor Y, Bose A, Booth V, Nadim F. Contribution of synaptic depression to phase maintenance in a model rhythmic network. J Neurophysiol. 2003;90:3513–3528. doi: 10.1152/jn.00411.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Marder E. Variability, compensation, and modulation in neurons and circuits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(Suppl 3):15542–15548. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010674108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Marder E, Bucher D. Understanding circuit dynamics using the stomatogastric nervous system of lobsters and crabs. Annu Rev Physiol. 2007;69:291–316. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.69.031905.161516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Marder E, Eisen JS. Transmitter identification of pyloric neurons: electrically coupled neurons use different neurotransmitters. J Neurophysiol. 1984;51:1345–1361. doi: 10.1152/jn.1984.51.6.1345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Marder E, Goaillard JM. Variability, compensation and homeostasis in neuron and network function. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7:563–574. doi: 10.1038/nrn1949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Morris LG, Hooper SL. Muscle response to changing neuronal input in the lobster (Panulirus interruptus) stomatogastric system: spike number-versus spike frequency-dependent domains. J Neurosci. 1997;17:5956–5971. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-15-05956.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Morris LG, Hooper SL. Muscle response to changing neuronal input in the lobster (Panulirus interruptus) stomatogastric system: slow muscle properties can transform rhythmic input into tonic output. J Neurosci. 1998;18:3433–3442. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-09-03433.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Morris LG, Hooper SL. Mechanisms underlying stabilization of temporally summated muscle contractions in the lobster (Panulirus) pyloric system. J Neurophysiol. 2001;85:254–268. doi: 10.1152/jn.2001.85.1.254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rabbah P, Nadim F. Distinct synaptic dynamics of heterogeneous pacemaker neurons in an oscillatory network. J Neurophysiol. 2007;97:2239–2253. doi: 10.1152/jn.01161.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rinberg A, Taylor AL, Marder E. The effects of temperature on the stability of a neuronal oscillator. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9:e1002857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Robertson RM, Money TG. Temperature and neuronal circuit function: compensation, tuning and tolerance. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2012;22:724–734. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2012.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Roemschied FA, Eberhard MJB, Schleimer JH, Ronacher B, Schreiber S. Cell-intrinsic mechanisms of temperature compensation in a grasshopper sensory receptor neuron. eLife. 2014;3:e02078. doi: 10.7554/eLife.02078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Schulz DJ, Goaillard JM, Marder E. Variable channel expression in identified single and electrically coupled neurons in different animals. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9:356–362. doi: 10.1038/nn1639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Schulz DJ, Goaillard JM, Marder E. Quantitative expression profiling of identified neurons reveals cell-specific constraints on highly variable levels of gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:13187–13191. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705827104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Soofi W, Goeritz ML, Kispersky TJ, Prinz AA, Marder E, Stein W. Phase maintenance in a rhythmic motor pattern during temperature changes in vivo. J Neurophysiol. 2014;111:2603–2613. doi: 10.1152/jn.00906.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Stephens PJ, Atwood HL. Thermal acclimation in a crustacean neuromuscular system. J Exp Biol. 1982;98:39–47. doi: 10.1242/jeb.98.1.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Tang LS, Goeritz ML, Caplan JS, Taylor AL, Fisek M, Marder E. Precise temperature compensation of phase in a rhythmic motor pattern. PLoS Biol. 2010;8:e1000469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Tang LS, Taylor AL, Rinberg A, Marder E. Robustness of a rhythmic circuit to short- and long-term temperature changes. J Neurosci. 2012;32:10075–10085. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1443-12.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Thuma JB, Hobbs KH, Burstein HJ, Seiter NS, Hooper SL. Temperature sensitivity of the pyloric neuromuscular system and its modulation by dopamine. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e67930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wechselberger M, Wright CL, Bishop GA, Boulant JA. Ionic channels and conductance-based models for hypothalamic neuronal thermosensitivity. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2006;291:R518–R529. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00039.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Comparative Physiology. A, Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES