Abstract
Purpose
We present our center’s experience with 34 consecutive cases who underwent in vitro maturation (IVM) of oocytes obtained from ovariectomy specimens and compare our data with updated literature data.
Methods
Feasibility and efficiency of oocyte collection during ovarian tissue processing was assessed by the recovery rate, maturation rate, and embryological development after IVM.
Results
On average, 14 immature oocytes were retrieved per patient during ovarian tissue processing in 33/34 patients. The overall maturation rate after IVM was 36 %. The maturation rate correlated with the age of the patient and the duration of IVM. Predominately, oocyte vitrification was performed. Eight couples preferred embryo cryopreservation. Here, a 65 % fertilization rate was obtained and at least one good-quality day 3 embryo was cryopreserved in 7/8 couples. The retrieval of oocytes ex vivo resulted in mature oocytes or embryos available for vitrification in 79 % of patients. One patient with ovarian insufficiency following therapeutic embolization of the left uterine and the right ovarian artery because of an arteriovenous malformation had an embryo transfer of one good-quality warmed embryo generated after IVM ex vivo, which resulted in an ongoing clinical pregnancy.
Conclusions
IVM of oocytes obtained ex vivo during the processing of ovarian cortex prior to cryopreservation is a procedure with emerging promise for patients at risk for fertility loss, as illustrated by the reported pregnancy. However, more data are needed in order to estimate the overall success rate and safety of this novel approach.
Keywords: Fertility preservation, In vitro maturation, Ovarian cortex cryopreservation, Oocyte, Embryo
Introduction
For many years, cancer survival rates have been steadily increasing urging the medical community to shift their focus to the quality of life of the growing population of cancer survivors. For women in their reproductive period of life, fertility preservation is an emerging discipline that thrives on the improved efficiency of cryotechnology and the advances in reproductive medicine. Female cancer patients can undergo ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins to have a number of oocytes or embryos vitrified for eventual later use, providing hope of an increased chance to have their genetically own children.
In general, ovarian stimulation followed by transvaginal oocyte retrieval requires almost 2 weeks, which in a subset of cancer patients causes an unacceptable delay to initiate cancer therapy. In these patients and in those with hormone-sensitive tumors or those of prepubertal age, ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) is the only available option if high-risk gonadotoxic cancer treatment is planned (reviewed by De Vos et al. [1]). Although OTC is still considered experimental [2], many researchers believe that this technology holds huge promise and 37 live births are reported to date [3].
In order to maximize the fertility preservation potential of surgically removed ovaries, Revel et al. [4] were the first to “rescue” immature oocytes derived from small antral follicles within ovariectomy specimens during tissue processing in the lab (“ex vivo”), thereby generating an additional source of oocytes for cryopreservation. Since the first report of this combined technique, 13 further publications [4–17] have documented this strategy, either as a case report or in a case series (summarized in Table 1). In these publications, collection of immature oocytes was attempted in patients ranging from 0 to 44 years old and COC were identified in approximately 87 % of patients, making this an interesting procedure to augment the number of oocytes available for cryopreservation. Interestingly, neither the phase of the menstrual cycle nor the use of oral contraceptives appears to compromise the retrieval of COC during ovarian tissue processing [11], rendering this procedure potentially applicable in all women in need of OTC.
Table 1.
Transport from OK to lab | Transport from OK to lab | Collection method | In vitro maturation | [O2] | Duration | Strategy | Age (years) | No. of patients | No. of patients with COC | No. of COC | No. of COC for IVM | % maturation | % survival (vitrification) | No. of patients for ICSI/AA | No. of MII for ICSI/AA | % fertilization | No. of embryos vitrified | Conclusions | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revel et al., 2003 | Leibovitz’s L-15 | Ice | Antral follicle puncture + medullar follicles | P-1 (Irvine) + SSS | 5 % | 24 + 24 h | Oocyte or embryo slow freezing | 14–31 | 9 | 7 | 32 | 10 | 50 % | 3 | 5 | 100 | 3 | Clinical case report | |
Isachenko et al., 2004 | DPBS + 10 % HSA | 37 °C | Antral follicle puncture | IVF medium (IVF Science) + FSH + hCG + E2 + ITS + patient’s serum | 20 % | 36 h | Oocyte slow freezing | 26–33 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 18 | 56 % | Clinical case report | |||||
Huang et al., 2007 | Leibovitz’s L-15 | 4 °C | Antral follicle puncture | IVM medium (Cooper Surgical) + FSH + LH | 20 % | 24 + 24 h | Oocyte vitrification | 43 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 75 % | Clinical case report | |||||
Huang et al., 2008 | Leibovitz’s L-15 | 4 °C | Antral follicle puncture + medullar follicles | IVM medium (SAGE) + FSH + LH | 20 % | 24 + 24 h | Oocyte vitrification | 18–38 | 4 | 4 | 11 | 11 | 79 % | Clinical case report | |||||
Huang et al., 2008b | Leibovitz’s L-15 | 4 °C | Antral follicles puncture + medullar follicles | IVM medium (SAGE) + FSH + LH | 20 % | 24 + 24 h | Oocyte vitrification | 16 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 11 | 73 % | Clinical case report: mosaic Turner syndrome | |||||
Revel et al., 2009 | Leibovitz’s L-15 | Ice | Antral follicle puncture + medullar follicles | P1 (Irvine) + SSS or IVM medium (Sage) or homemade IVM medium | 5 % | 24 + 24 h | Oocyte slow freezing | 5–20 | 19 | 17 | 179 | 133 | 34 % | Retrospective clinical study: oocyte retrieval possible from 5 years onwards | |||||
Gonzalez et al., 2011 | Leibovitz’s L-15 | Cold | Antral follicle puncture | IVM medium (Origio) + FSH + hCG | 20 % | 24 + 24 h | Oocyte vitrification | 28 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 100 % | Clinical case report | |||||
Fasano et al., 2011 | Leibovitz’s L-15 | 4 °C | Antral follicle puncture + medullar follicles | IVM medium (SAGE) + FSH + LH | 20 % | 24 + 24 h | Oocyte or embryo vitrification | 8–35 | 57 | 42 | 266 | 235 | 31 % | 3 | 10 | – | 5 | Retrospective clinical study: oocyte retrieval possible regardless menstrual phase, use oral contraceptives or age | |
Escriba et al., 2012 | DMEM | 25 °C | Antral follicle excision + medullar follicles | CCM (Vitrolife) | 20 % | 24 + 24 h | Artificial activation | 15–38 | 33 | 30 | 108 | 108 | 36 % | 41b | Research study: oocyte retrieval possible from follicles > and <6 mm, regardless menstrual phase | ||||
Imesch et al., 2013 | IVM medium (Sage) | NA | Antral follicle puncture | IVM medium (SAGE) + FSH + LH | 20 % | 24 + 24 h | Oocyte vitrification + activation | 18–41 | 7 | 7 | 63 | 63 | 62 % | 62 % | 75b | Research study: in vitro maturation, oocyte vitrification and artifical activation | |||
Wilken-Jensen et al.,2013 | N.A. | 37° 5–10′ or 0° 2–5 h | Antral follicle puncture + medullar follicles | LAG + IVM medium (Origio) + FSH/LH/EGF/FF in different compositions | 7 % | 24 + 24 h | Time lapse imaging of IVM | 0–38 | 69 | 61 | 682 | 682 | 3 %a | Research study: oocyte retrieval possible after transport, after chemo/radio therapy, but compromizes maturation rate. | |||||
Prasath et al., 2013 | HTF | NA | Antral follicle puncture | IVM medium (Origio) + FSH + hCG | NA | 24 h | Embryo slow freezing | 21 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 100 % | 1 | 4 | – | 3 | Clinical case report: live birth | |
Takae et al., 2014 | Saline solution | 37 °C | Antral follicle puncture + medullar follicles | IVM medium (Origio) + FSH + SSS | 5 % | 24 + 24 h | Oocyte cryopreservation? | 25–41 | 27 | 25 | 226 | 215 | 50 % | Retrospective clinical study: oocyte retrieval is correlated with AMH, retrieval regardless menstrual phase | |||||
Shirasawa et al., 2013 | PBS | Warm | Antral follicle puncture | M199 + SSS + FSH | 5 % | 24 + 24 h | Oocyte fixation | 35–44 | 8 | 8 | 87 | 87 | 13 % | Research study: some spindle and chromatin abnormalities |
Literature overview of published research regarding oocytes retrieved from extracorporeal whole ovary tissue for cortex cryopreservation
NA not available, DPBS Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline, DMEM Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium, HTF Human Tubal fluid, P-1 preimplantation stage 1, SSS serum substitute supplement, IVF in vitro fertilization, FSH follicle-stimulating hormone, hCG human chorionic gonadotropin, E2 estradiol, ITS insulin-transferrin-selenium, LH luteinizing hormone, CCM blastocyst culture medium, EGF epidermal growth factor, FF: Follicle Fluid, M199: Medium 199
aIncludes naked oocytes in IVM
bArtificial activation, not fertilization
Published in vitro maturation (IVM)-rates of COC collected ex vivo ranged from 3 % [14] to 100 % [10, 15]. From the 1583 immature oocytes collected and incubated in IVM culture media reported in literature, 351 reached the metaphase II (MII) stage (22 %). However, an important proportion of these immature oocytes originated from two reports with very low maturation rates (3 % [14] and 13 % [17]), possibly caused by differences in starting material and analysis method (ovaries transported for several hours, naked oocytes, absence of morphologic assessment of maturity). Because of the different scientific strategies in both studies, the data from these studies were omitted from our analysis, which resulted in an adjusted overall maturation rate in literature of 39 % for oocytes harvested ex vivo from ovaries collected for OTC (Table 1).
The available literature data show that COC can consistently be obtained during the OTC procedure. These oocytes are capable of maturing in vitro, can survive the process of vitrification and warming [13], and can undergo fertilization followed by embryo development [4, 11, 15]. Recently, the first live birth was reported after transfer of two frozen-thawed day 2 embryos obtained after IVM ex vivo in Singapore [15]. Here, we document our own experience with this strategy and the efficiency of oocyte collection during OTC to provide more evidence of the promise held by combining OTC and IVM. The combination of these two techniques has culminated in the report of the first clinical pregnancy from ex vivo harvested oocytes in Europe.
Materials and methods
Patient population
From January 2012 to October 2014, 34 patients were enrolled in the fertility preservation program of UZ Brussel and consented to undergo a combination of OTC and IVM ex vivo procedures (Table 2). This strategy was approved by the IRB of the hospital and all patients gave written informed consent. In 32 patients, unilateral ovariectomy was performed; one patient underwent ovarian biopsies from each ovary and one patient underwent bilateral ovariectomy as a preventative measure because of BRCA1 mutation carriership. The age of the patients ranged from 0 to 38 years, with 6 prepubertal girls (<12 years old, no menarche) and 28 adult women (17–38 years). None of the patients had undergone ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins immediately prior to ovariectomy. One patient received chemotherapy 1 year before OTC (patient no. 8); the other patients did not receive chemotherapy or radiotherapy before OTC.
Table 2.
Patient no. | Age at OTC | Phase menstural cycle at OTC | Indication | No. cortical strips for OTC | IVM duration (h) | No. COC | No. MII | Maturation rate (%) | Vitrification |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0 | Neuroblastoma | 8 | 30 | 6 | 0 | 0 | O | |
2 | 4 | SCT for chronical myelomonocytic leukemia | 5 | 30 | 9 | 0 | 0 | O | |
3 | 7 | SCT for hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis | 8 | 40 | 15 | 2 | 13 | O | |
4 | 8 | SCT for severe aplastic anemia | 10 | 30 | 21 | 8 | 38 | O | |
5 | 10 | McCune-Albright syndrome | 20 | 30 | 58 | 17 | 29 | O | |
6 | 11 | Hodgkin lymphoma | 10 | 30 | 18 | 5 | 28 | O | |
7 | 17 | NA | SCT for acute lymphoblastic leukemia | 21 | 40 | 24 | 7 | 29 | O |
8 | 19 | F | Hodgkin lymphoma | 14 | 40 | 26 | 11 | 42 | O |
9 | 21 | F | Synovial sarcoma | 10 | 40 | 39 | 22 | 56 | O |
10 | 24 | NA | Malignant neoplasm of breast | 27 | 28 | 35 | 7 | 20 | O |
11 | 24 | L | Malignant neoplasm of rectum | 22 | 30 | 10 | 4 | 40 | O |
12 | 26 | F | Malignant neoplasm of breast | 14 | 40 | 20 | 12 | 60 | E |
13 | 26 | NA | Arteriovenous malformation | 26 | 30 | 13 | 6 | 46 | E |
14 | 27 | NA | Minimal deviation adenocarcinoma of cervix | 28a | 30 | 15 | 4 | 27 | O |
15 | 27 | F | Systemic lupus erythematosus | 10 | 40 | 2 | 2 | 100 | E |
16 | 28 | NA | Malignant neoplasm of cervix | 16 | 30 | 1 | 0 | 0 | O |
17 | 28 | L | Malignant neoplasm of breast | 16 | 30 | 8 | 4 | 50 | O |
18 | 29 | L | Malignant neoplasm of breast | 10 | 28 | 10 | 0 | 0 | O |
19 | 29 | F | Malignant neoplasm of breast | 10 | 28 | 12 | 4 | 33 | O |
20 | 29 | F | Malignant neoplasm of breast | 17 | 28 | 18 | 6 | 33 | E |
21 | 30 | L | Malignant neoplasm of breast | 21 | 30 | 10 | 4 | 40 | O |
22 | 30 | F | Malignant neoplansm of breast | 8 | 30 | 3 | 1 | 33 | O |
23 | 31 | F | Malignant neoplasm of breast | 10 | 30 | 3 | 2 | 67 | O |
24 | 31 | F | Malignant neoplasm of breast | 20 | 40 | 21 | 4 | 19 | E |
25 | 31 | F | Malignant neoplasm of endometrium | 9a,b | 28 | 19 | 7 | 37 | O |
26 | 31 | NA | Ovarian borderline tumor | 2a | 30 | 0 | O | ||
27 | 31 | F | Immature teratoma of tuba | 0 | 30 | 2 | 0 | 0 | E |
28 | 32 | F | Malignant neoplasm of breast | 20 | 40 | 39 | 10 | 46 | O |
29 | 34 | NA | Preventive bilateral ovariectomy for BRCA | 0c | 30 | 6 | 6 | 100 | E |
30 | 35 | L | Malignant neoplasm of breast | 14 | 40 | 7 | 2 | 29 | E |
31 | 36 | F | Malignant neoplasm of breast | 14 | 28 | 8 | 3 | 38 | E |
32 | 36 | NA | Malignant neoplasm of breast | 15 | 30 | 4 | 1 | 25 | O |
33 | 36 | NA | Malignant neoplasm of breast | 25 | 30 | 12 | 5 | 42 | O |
34 | 38 | L | Malignant neoplasm of breast | 17 | 40 | 7 | 5 | 71 | O |
Mean | 14 | 14.7 | 5.4 | 36.1 | |||||
SEM | 1.3 | 2.2 | 0.9 | 4.3 |
Overview of the patients in which OTC was combined with ex vivo collection of COC for IVM to obtain mature oocytes (MII). After IVM, vitrification was performed of the mature oocytes (O) or of good quality embryos (E) after ICSI with partner’s sperm
F follicular phase, L luteal phase, NA information not available, SCT stem cell transplantation, BRCA breast cancer susceptibility gene
aOvarian tissue was removed in a different hospital and transported to UZ-Brussel within 3 h on ice
bTwo biopsies were taken
cTwo ovaries were removed. If not stated otherwise one ovary was removed for OTC
Ovariectomy and ex vivo IVM
Unilateral ovariectomy was performed by laparoscopy. Ovarian tissue was transported in a sterile 0.9 % saline solution on ice to the IVF laboratory within 10 min. For three patients, ovarian tissue was surgically collected in another hospital and transported in a sterile saline solution on ice to our hospital within 3 h. On arrival in the lab, visible antral follicles were punctured with a scalpel to release the follicle fluid in the culture dish. Ovarian tissue was trimmed to 1–2 mm thickness in Leibovitz L-15 medium (Life Technologies, Merelbeke, Belgium) supplemented with 4 mg/ml HSA (Vitrolife, Göteborg, Sweden) and 100 IU/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (penicillin/streptomycin mix, Life Technologies) as described elsewhere [18]. Immature oocytes, released from follicles that ruptured during the OTC process, were immediately collected by a second operator using stereo microscopy at 37 °C. COC were washed twice in Flushing medium (Medicult, Origio, Vreeland, Netherlands). All collected COC were surrounded by compact cumulus cells and were assumed to contain immature oocytes. Naked or partially denuded oocytes (>50 %) were not considered for IVM. COC were washed in LAG medium (IVM System, Medicult, Origio) and incubated in IVM medium (IVM System, Medicult, Origio) supplemented with 75 mIU/ml HP-hMG (Menopur, Ferring, Saint-Prex, Switzerland), 100 mIU/ml hCG (Pregnyl, Organon, MSD, Haarlem, Netherlands), and 10 mg/ml HSA (Vitrolife) for 30 or 40 h in a four-well dish with oil overlay (Ovoil, Vitrolife) in an incubator containing 6 % CO2 in air at 37 °C.
Oocyte or embryo vitrification
After IVM, cumulus cells were removed by hyaluronidase exposure and manual denudation of the oocyte. Mature oocytes were used for vitrification or for insemination with partner’s sperm by ICSI. All sperm samples were fresh ejaculates of good quality. Embryos were cultured in individual 25 μl droplets of sequential media formulations under oil (Ovoil, Vitrolife) up to day 3 after ICSI. Six cycles were performed in Quinn’s Advantage series (SAGE, Origio) and two cycles in Origio sequential series (Origio). Sixteen to 18 h post-insemination, fertilization was assessed by the presence of two pronuclei. On day 2 of preimplantation development, cleavage divisions were recorded. Embryos reaching at least six cells on day 3 with fragmentation limited to 20 % or less were considered for cryopreservation. Day 3 embryos were categorized as excellent, good, moderate, and poor quality based on the cell number, degree of fragmentation, blastomere uniformity, multinucleation, and the presence of vacuoles and/or granularity. In summary, excellent embryos have ≥7 cells, <10 % fragmentation, and blastomere size according to the division pattern; good embryos have ≥6 cells and/or less than 50 % fragmentation; moderate embryos have ≥4 cells and/or <50 % fragmentation or <50 % of the cells multinucleated; and poor embryos display growth arrest (<4 cells) and/or severe fragmentation (>50 %) and/or severe multinucleation.
Oocytes and embryos were vitrified using the Vitrification kit media (Irvine Scientific, Tilburg, Netherlands) and high-security straws (VHS Kit, CryoBiosystem, L’Aigle, France) with a protocol adjusted for oocytes or embryos.
Results are presented as mean values ± SEM in tables and text.
Results
OTC and ex vivo IVM
In two patients, no ovarian cortex tissue was available for cryopreservation (Table 2). For one patient who suffered from an immature teratoma of the tube, a small volume of macroscopically normal tissue was processed to search for COC and afterwards sent to the pathology department for further investigation. The second patient, a 34-year-old carrier of a deleterious BRCA1 mutation, underwent removal of both ovaries and preferred not to have ovarian cortex cryopreserved. This patient opted for an embryo cryopreservation approach and had undergone six cycles of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) prior to ovariectomy.
On average, 14 ovarian cortex fragments were cryopreserved per patient in 34 patients, with a maximum of 28 fragments.
In total, 501 COC were retrieved. A wide range of COC numbers were identified (0–58 COC) with a mean of 14.7 ± 2.2 COC per patient. In only one patient, COC were not detected. This 31-year old patient suffered from a borderline ovarian epithelial tumor. Only a small fragment of her ovary was identified as macroscopically normal tissue by the attending pathologist and was used for OTC; the limited amount of material for OTC may explain the inability to identify COC.
Maturation rate
The overall maturation rate was 36.1 ± 4.3 % (Table 2). In five patients, no mature oocytes were obtained after IVM, partly due to a limited amount of COC (range 1–-10) available for these patients. Strikingly, in both of our two youngest patients of 9 months and 4 years old, COC were found but no mature oocytes were obtained after IVM. In four older prepubertal children, mature oocytes were obtained. If subdivided by age, a maturation rate of 18 % ± 7 % was obtained for prepubertal girls (n = 6) and 40 % ± 5 % for adults (n = 27).
IVM of ex vivo harvested COC was performed with the protocol used for a regular IVM oocyte pick up in PCOS patients. Between January 2012 and October 2014, the IVM incubation time was changed in our PCOS clinic, where a 40-h maturation period resulted in the highest maturation rate and 28-h maturation resulted in improved embryo quality (unpublished results). A 30-h maturation period was found to give the best balance between maturation rate and embryological outcome, and is currently the standard IVM incubation period in our center. In our adult patient population IVM was performed during 40 h for 9 patients resulting in a maturation rate of 50 ± 8 %, compared to 35 ± 6 % maturation after 28–30 h IVM in 18 patients.
Most patients (25 out of 34) preferred to cryopreserve mature oocytes. For 9 patients, who were in a stable relationship at the time of ovariectomy, the couple preferred to fertilize the oocytes with partner’s sperm followed by cryopreservation of embryos.
Embryo cryopreservation
Within the group of women who preferred embryo cryopreservation (Table 3), one patient had 0/2 oocytes matured after IVM. This is the aforementioned patient in whom ovarian tissue cryopreservation could not be performed due to an ovarian immature teratoma. Fertility preservation could not be offered for this patient.
Table 3.
In vitro maturation | Fertilization | Embryo quality on day 3 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient no. | No. of COC | No. of MII | Maturation rate (%) | No. of fertilized oocytes | Fertilization rate (%) | No. of vitrified embryos | Utilization rate (%) | Excellent | Good | Moderate | Poor |
12 | 20 | 12 | 60 | 9 | 75 | 5 | 56 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
13 | 13 | 6 | 46 | 3 | 50 | 3 | 100 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
15 | 2 | 2 | 100 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
20 | 18 | 6 | 33 | 5 | 83 | 1 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
24 | 21 | 4 | 19 | 3 | 75 | 2 | 67 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
27 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
29 | 6 | 6 | 100 | 5 | 83 | 5 | 100 | 5 | |||
30 | 7 | 2 | 29 | 1 | 50 | 1 | 100 | 1 | |||
31 | 8 | 3 | 38 | 3 | 100 | 3 | 100 | 2 | 1 | ||
Mean | 10.8 | 4.6 | 47 | 3.5 | 65 | 2.9 | 68 | ||||
SEM | 2.5 | 1.2 | 11 | 1.0 | 11 | 0.6 | 14 |
Preimplantation development after IVM of oocytes harvested during OTC. Fertilization rate is defined as visible 2PN or early cleavage division on day 1 after ICSI. Utilization rate is defined as embryos vitrified per fertilized oocyte. Embryo quality of all fertilized oocytes are presented in categories: excellent, good, moderate, and poor
In eight couples, mature oocytes were available for ICSI and an average fertilization rate of 65 ± 11 % was obtained. In one of these couples, two COC were found during OTC, both oocytes matured, but fertilization failed. For seven couples, at least one embryo was vitrified, with an average of 2.9 embryos cryopreserved. The quality of the embryos classified as excellent, good, moderate, or poor is presented in Table 3. Excellent embryos were obtained in the majority of the patients.
IVM ex vivo combined with OTC for patients undergoing fertility preservation resulted in mature oocytes or embryos available for vitrification and ovarian tissue freezing in 27 out of 34 patients (79 %).
Frozen embryo transfers
So far, none of the patients in this study have requested oocyte warming in order to achieve a pregnancy. One couple recently requested the transfer of vitrified-warmed embryos. This patient was nulliparous and 26 years old and had an AMH of 2.3 ng/ml at the time of diagnosis. She had undergone unilateral ovariectomy because of a benign pelvic arteriovenous malformation. This was treated by intravascular coiling of the ovarian artery and interventional radiological treatment. Imminent ovarian insufficiency was noted after interventional radiological treatment as illustrated by an AMH serum concentration of 0.04 ng/ml.
At the time of ovariectomy, the ex vivo harvesting procedure resulted in 13 immature oocytes, of which 6 matured after IVM, 3 oocytes were successfully fertilized, and 3 embryos were cryopreserved on day 3 (two of excellent and one of moderate quality).
In her first frozen-warmed embryo transfer cycle (FET), 6/8 cells survived in the warmed embryo, but no pregnancy was obtained. In her second FET, 9/10 cells survived in the warmed embryo and the patient became pregnant. At the time of writing this manuscript, the patient had an ongoing clinical pregnancy beyond 20 weeks of gestation.
Discussion
The option of ovarian tissue cryopreservation for fertility preservation has to be considered very carefully and a risk and benefit analysis for each individual patient should be made [19]. Future transplantation of ovarian tissue is currently not possible for a number of cancer types due to inferred high risks of reintroducing malignant cells (review Rosendahl [20]). In patients with, e.g., leukemia, ovarian tissue grafting is not recommended [21], although the tumor-inducing potential of a small numbers of leukemic cells within grafted ovarian tissue is unknown [22]. For this group of patients, isolated follicles embedded within an artificial ovary [23] or in vitro follicle growth will be required to safely restore fertility, but these approaches are not yet clinically available [24] and their (epi)genetic safety will need further scrutiny. When ovarian tissue transplantation can be performed, the “take home baby” rate remains uncertain due to underreporting. Donnez et al. [3] combined results of three centers to calculate a conception rate of 20/80 patients after ovarian tissue transplantation. Spontaneous conception after transplantation has been described and pregnancies after ovarian stimulation with IVF have also been reported, but with low efficiency [25, 26]. Hence, ovarian tissue cryopreservation holds a promise, but no guarantee. The collection of immature oocytes ex vivo during ovarian tissue preparation, followed by in vitro maturation and oocyte/embryo vitrification can result in pregnancies after embryo transfer. This additional source of oocytes is particularly important when transplantation of ovarian tissue is contraindicated.
Ovarian tissue cryopreservation can be performed for prepubertal children as well as for adults. These populations are very divergent in terms of ovarian constitution and hormonal profile. Gonadotropin-independent recruitment of follicular growth until the early antral stages makes it theoretically possible to retrieve competent oocytes from ovaries of prepubertal children. In this study, oocytes were found during OTC processing for prepubertal children, but their maturation potential appeared to be compromised (18 %), compared to oocytes from adult ovaries (40 %). Similar low maturation rates of oocytes from prepubertal ovaries of 24 and 33 % were reported by Revel et al. [5] and Fasano et al. [11]. In the two youngest patients of our study, aged 9 months and 4 years old, no single oocyte matured after IVM. Wilken-Jensen [14] reported that no maturation was achieved after IVM of oocytes harvested ex vivo in a 3-year-old girl. Until now, the youngest age at which mature oocytes have been obtained after IVM of ex vivo oocytes was 5 years of age [5]. Compared to adult ovarian tissue, prepubertal ovarian tissue appears to contain a relatively larger population of abnormal follicles. In addition, follicle development and oocyte growth in culture was compromised [27]. It has been hypothesized that the prepubertal ovary needs a “maturation phase” in childhood to gain optimal follicle function around the age of 25 [27, 28]. Hence, it is possible that the oocytes harvested from ovarian tissue of young children might lack the capacity to resume meiosis.
In our study, a maturation rate of 40 % was obtained in adult women. According to the literature, an overall oocyte maturation rate of 39 % is obtained with respect to oocytes harvested ex vivo. This maturation rate is slightly lower than what is observed in non-hCG-triggered IVM cycles in women with PCOS in the fertility clinic after minimal stimulation with HP-hMG (46 % maturation rate, 211 cycles performed using the same IVM protocol as in IVM of ex vivo retrieved oocytes, unpublished results). It is also lower than the in vitro maturation rates achieved after transvaginal oocyte retrieval in cancer patients requesting fertility preservation (48 to 79 % [29]). In IVM cycles for reproductive treatment, oocytes from follicles with a diameter of 6–12 mm are transvaginally retrieved [30]. However, oocytes released during the processing of ovarian tissue are presumably originating also from follicles with smaller diameters, which are more likely to contain a less competent oocyte. However, oocytes from follicles <6 mm have also been reported to result in healthy offspring [31]. Similarly, oocytes derived from follicles <6 or ≥6 mm during OTC processing were both able to mature [12]. Hence, the retrieval of oocytes from small antral follicles can be a valid source of oocytes for fertility preservation.
While maturation rate is a highly amenable parameter to investigate after IVM of ex vivo retrieved oocytes, less information is available about the developmental competence of these oocytes. In our study, 74 % of the adult women opted for oocyte vitrification. In the remaining nine patients who requested embryo cryopreservation, a fertilization rate of 63 % was obtained using ICSI. From 49 % of the fertilized oocytes, embryos of sufficient quality for cryopreservation were formed, which is comparable to the 50–75 % utilization rate reported for oocytes harvested ex vivo [4, 11, 15]. For comparison, a 70 % fertilization and 43 % embryo utilization rate was obtained using the same IVM protocol for PCOS patients in our fertility clinic. It can be concluded that oocytes collected during an OTC procedure are capable of developing into embryos of good morphological quality, but with lower maturation and fertilization rates when compared to IVM after transvaginal oocyte retrieval in the clinic for infertile patients with PCOS.
The introduction of a successful oocyte vitrification program in the general ART practice brought new perspectives for fertility preservation. Oocyte vitrification has proven to be a safe technique [32] with a high post-warming survival rate (90 % [33]). When immature oocytes are vitrified, their maturation potential appears to be decreased after vitrification, which favors the approach of IVM after retrieval and subsequent vitrification of mature oocytes. This was observed in both stimulated [34, 35] and unstimulated IVM cycles [36]. Additionally, oocyte survival was decreased in in vitro matured (67.5 %) compared to in vivo matured oocytes (81.4 %; [37]). To date, only a few live births have been reported from cryopreserved IVM oocytes [38–40]. In a study reporting on 39 oocytes retrieved during the OTC process and matured in-vitro, Imesh et al. [13] reported a survival rate of 61.5 % after vitrification/warming. No live birth has been reported from in vitro matured and subsequently vitrified oocytes that had been recovered ex vivo.
Many aspects regarding the emerging technique of IVM of ex vivo retrieved oocytes remain unaddressed. Transport and dissection of the ovary creates a time interval during which oocytes, while still within their follicle, are deprived from circulating blood flow (oxygen, nutrients, metabolites,…) and, depending on the laboratory’s protocol, exposed to cold temperature and pH fluctuations. All these factors may disturb normal physiology and impair the intrinsic oocyte’s potential. Transport and dissection of ovarian cortex in cold temperature has been reported in seven publications (Table 1); in four publications, the ovary was kept warm until the oocytes were harvested for IVM. Chilling impairs spindle and cytoskeleton ultrastructure of the GV oocyte [41, 42] and should preferably be avoided before oocyte IVM, although for tissue preservation, chilling is often recommended.
Theoretically, long-term storage of vitrified oocytes in liquid nitrogen should be relatively safe without any obvious undesirable biological and metabolic changes in the cells. However, research regarding long-term storage extending a 5-year period is scarce [43]. There has been one report of a live twin birth after IVF of oocytes that had been cryopreserved for almost 12 years after using a slow freezing method [44].
The hormonal environment of the ovary at the time of ovariectomy is another topic for further scrutiny. Retrieval of immature oocytes during OTC processing and maturation rates after subsequent IVM culture have been shown not to be influenced by the menstrual phase [11, 12, 16] similar to IVM after transvaginal egg retrieval in unstimulated cycles for fertility preservation [45]. Minimal stimulation with gonadotropins before ovariectomy might stimulate follicles to grow and more competent oocytes could potentially be obtained. COS followed by hCG maturation trigger and oocyte retrieval 34–36 h later, combined with ovarian tissue biopsy after oocyte retrieval has been described [46], however with a negative impact on the quality of ovarian tissue for cryopreservation [47].
In our own experience with patients undergoing OTC with IVM of oocytes retrieved ex vivo, only one couple requested transfer of their cryopreserved embryos generated with this approach. The patient had an arteriovenous malformation of the pelvis and underwent therapeutic embolization of the left uterine artery and the right ovarian artery because of a substantial risk of hemorrhage during pregnancy. Because of the risk of damage to the vascular supply of the right ovary, this ovary was surgically removed and cryopreserved. IVM of oocytes harvested ex vivo resulted in cryopreservation of three cleavage-stage embryos of good morphological quality. Three months after the embolization procedure, a single embryo transfer was scheduled for this patient. Embryo survival was good, but implantation was only obtained after the second single embryo transfer. At the time of writing, the patient has an ongoing clinical pregnancy beyond 20 weeks’ gestation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of an ongoing clinical pregnancy generated with an oocyte harvested during the procedure of OTC in Europe. The first live birth from an oocyte harvested during OTC was reported by Prasath et al. [15] in Singapore, where transfer of two warmed day 2 embryos was performed. It is evident that the children born from this novel technique will need to be closely monitored. However, studies investigating the health of children born after IVM after transvaginal oocyte retrieval are reassuring with regard to birth weight, congenital anomalies, growth pattern, and development [48, 49].
Conclusion
Based on the available literature data and our own experience, this report attempted to highlight the potential, the benefits, and the pitfalls from the novel approach in fertility preservation of harvesting oocytes during OTC. Current data indicate that immature oocytes can be retrieved during OTC and that a subset of these oocytes are able to mature in vitro; fertilization and embryo culture can result in good-quality cleavage stage embryos that can be cryopreserved. We report an ongoing pregnancy obtained after transfer of a vitrified/warmed day 3 embryo, generated with an oocyte retrieved ex vivo and matured in vitro. The data available so far highlight that oocytes collected ex vivo from the ovary constitute an additional source of oocytes for patients who need fertility preservation.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the oncofertility team of the UZ Brussels and also give special thanks to the colleagues of the IVF laboratory, nurses, and doctors at the CRG and operating theater of UZ Brussels.
Footnotes
Capsule
In vitro maturation of oocytes obtained during ovarian tissue processing for cryopreservation holds promise for patients in need of fertility preservation as illustrated here with acceptable maturation rates, the capacity to form good-quality embryos, and an ongoing clinical pregnancy.
References
- 1.De Vos M, Smitz J, Woodruff TK. Fertility preservation in women with cancer. Lancet. 2014;384:1302–10. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60834-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ovarian tissue cryopreservation: a committee opinion Fertil Steril. 2014;101:1237–43. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.02.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Donnez J, Dolmans MM, Pellicer A, Diaz-Garcia C, Ernst E, Macklon KT, et al. Fertility preservation for age-related fertility decline. Lancet. 2015;385:506–7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60198-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Revel A, Koler M, Simon A, Lewin A, Laufer N, Safran A. Oocyte collection during cryopreservation of the ovarian cortex. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:1237–9. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(02)04963-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Revel A, Revel-Vilk S, Aizenman E, Porat-Katz A, Safran A, Ben-Meir A, et al. At what age can human oocytes be obtained? Fertil Steril. 2009;92:458–63. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Isachenko E, Rahimi G, Isachenko V, Nawroth F. In-vitro maturation of germinal-vesicle oocytes and cryopreservation in metaphase I/II: a possible additional option to preserve fertility during ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2004;8:553–7. doi: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61102-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Huang JY, Buckett WM, Gilbert L, Tan SL, Chian RC. Retrieval of immature oocytes followed by in vitro maturation and vitrification: a case report on a new strategy of fertility preservation in women with borderline ovarian malignancy. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;105:542–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.01.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Huang JY, Tulandi T, Holzer H, Lau NM, Macdonald S, Tan SL, et al. Cryopreservation of ovarian tissue and in vitro matured oocytes in a female with mosaic Turner syndrome: Case Report. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:336–9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Huang JY, Tulandi T, Holzer H, Tan SL, Chian RC. Combining ovarian tissue cryobanking with retrieval of immature oocytes followed by in vitro maturation and vitrification: an additional strategy of fertility preservation. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:567–72. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.03.090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gonzalez C, Devesa M, Boada M, Coroleu B, Veiga A, Barri PN. Combined strategy for fertility preservation in an oncologic patient: vitrification of in vitro matured oocytes and ovarian tissue freezing. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28:1147–9. doi: 10.1007/s10815-011-9628-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fasano G, Moffa F, Dechene J, Englert Y, Demeestere I. Vitrification of in vitro matured oocytes collected from antral follicles at the time of ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2011;9:150. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-9-150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Escriba MJ, Grau N, Escrich L, Novella-Maestre E, Sanchez-Serrano M. Spontaneous in vitro maturation of oocytes prior to ovarian tissue cryopreservation in natural cycles of oncologic patients. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29:1261–5. doi: 10.1007/s10815-012-9860-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Imesch P, Scheiner D, Xie M, Fink D, Macas E, Dubey R, et al. Developmental potential of human oocytes matured in vitro followed by vitrification and activation. J Ovarian Res. 2013;6:30. doi: 10.1186/1757-2215-6-30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wilken-Jensen HN, Kristensen SG, Jeppesen JV, Yding AC. Developmental competence of oocytes isolated from surplus medulla tissue in connection with cryopreservation of ovarian tissue for fertility preservation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014;93:32–7. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Prasath EB, Chan ML, Wong WH, Lim CJ, Tharmalingam MD, Hendricks M, et al. First pregnancy and live birth resulting from cryopreserved embryos obtained from in vitro matured oocytes after oophorectomy in an ovarian cancer patient. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:276–8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Takae S, Sugishita Y, Yoshioka N, Hoshina M, Horage Y, Sato Y, et al. The role of menstrual cycle phase and AMH levels in breast cancer patients whose ovarian tissue was cryopreserved for oncofertility treatment. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32:305–12. doi: 10.1007/s10815-014-0392-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Shirasawa H, Kumagai J, Sato W, Kumazawa Y, Sato N, Terada Y. Retrieval and in vitro maturation of human oocytes from ovaries removed during surgery for endometrial carcinoma: a novel strategy for human oocyte research. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30:1227–30. doi: 10.1007/s10815-013-0040-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Donnez J, Dolmans MM, Demylle D, Jadoul P, Pirard C, Squifflet J, et al. Livebirth after orthotopic transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue. Lancet. 2004;364:1405–10. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17222-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Imbert R, Moffa F, Tsepelidis S, Simon P, Delbaere A, Devreker F, et al. Safety and usefulness of cryopreservation of ovarian tissue to preserve fertility: a 12-year retrospective analysis. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:1931–40. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rosendahl M, Greve T, Andersen CY. The safety of transplanting cryopreserved ovarian tissue in cancer patients: a review of the literature. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30:11–24. doi: 10.1007/s10815-012-9912-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bastings L, Beerendonk CC, Westphal JR, Massuger LF, Kaal SE, van Leeuwen FE, et al. Autotransplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue in cancer survivors and the risk of reintroducing malignancy: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19:483–506. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmt020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Soares M, Saussoy P, Sahrari K, Amorim CA, Donnez J, Dolmans MM. Is transplantation of a few leukemic cells inside an artificial ovary able to induce leukemia in an experimental model? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32:597–606. doi: 10.1007/s10815-015-0438-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Luyckx V, Dolmans MM, Vanacker J, Legat C, Fortuno Moya C, Donnez J, et al. A new step toward the artificial ovary: survival and proliferation of isolated murine follicles after autologous transplantation in a fibrin scaffold. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:1149–56. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.12.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Telfer EE, Zelinski MB. Ovarian follicle culture: advances and challenges for human and nonhuman primates. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:1523–33. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.03.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Meirow D, Levron J, Eldar-Geva T, Hardan I, Fridman E, Yemini Z, et al. Monitoring the ovaries after autotransplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue: endocrine studies, in vitro fertilization cycles, and live birth. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(418):e7–e15. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Dolmans MM, Donnez J, Camboni A, Demylle D, Amorim C, Van Langendonckt A, et al. IVF outcome in patients with orthotopically transplanted ovarian tissue. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:2778–87. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Anderson RA, McLaughlin M, Wallace WH, Albertini DF, Telfer EE. The immature human ovary shows loss of abnormal follicles and increasing follicle developmental competence through childhood and adolescence. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:97–106. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hambridge HL, Mumford SL, Mattison DR, Ye A, Pollack AZ, Bloom MS, et al. The influence of sporadic anovulation on hormone levels in ovulatory cycles. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:1687–94. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sonigo C, Grynberg M. In vitro oocyte maturation for female fertility preservation. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2014;42:657–60. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2014.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Son WY, Chung JT, Herrero B, Dean N, Demirtas E, Holzer H, et al. Selection of the optimal day for oocyte retrieval based on the diameter of the dominant follicle in hCG-primed in vitro maturation cycles. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:2680–5. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Guzman L, Adriaenssens T, Ortega-Hrepich C, Albuz FK, Mateizel I, Devroey P, et al. Human antral follicles <6 mm: a comparison between in vivo maturation and in vitro maturation in non-hCG primed cycles using cumulus cell gene expression. Mol Hum Reprod. 2013;19:7–16. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gas038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.De Munck N, Petrussa L, Verheyen G, Staessen C, Vandeskelde Y, Sterckx J et al. Chromosomal meiotic segregation, embryonic developmental kinetics and DNA (hydroxy)methylation analysis consolidate the safety of human oocyte vitrification. Mol Hum Reprod. 2015. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 33.Stoop D, De Munck N, Jansen E, Platteau P, Van den Abbeel E, Verheyen G, et al. Clinical validation of a closed vitrification system in an oocyte-donation programme. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;24:180–5. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wang H, Racowsky C, Combelles CM. Is it best to cryopreserve human cumulus-free immature oocytes before or after in vitro maturation? Cryobiology. 2012;65:79–87. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2012.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Fasano G, Demeestere I, Englert Y. In-vitro maturation of human oocytes: before or after vitrification? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29:507–12. doi: 10.1007/s10815-012-9751-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Brambillasca F, Guglielmo MC, Coticchio G, Mignini Renzini M, Dal Canto M, Fadini R. The current challenges to efficient immature oocyte cryopreservation. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30:1531–9. doi: 10.1007/s10815-013-0112-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chian RC, Huang JY, Gilbert L, Son WY, Holzer H, Cui SJ, et al. Obstetric outcomes following vitrification of in vitro and in vivo matured oocytes. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:2391–8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chian RC, Gilbert L, Huang JY, Demirtas E, Holzer H, Benjamin A, et al. Live birth after vitrification of in vitro matured human oocytes. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:372–6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.11.088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.El Hachem H, Poulain M, Finet A, Fanchin R, Frydman N, Grynberg MH. Live birth after frozen-thawed oocytes matured in vitro in a PCOS patient: a model for improving implantation rates in IVM cycles and objectively assessing the real potential of development of frozen oocytes matured in vitro. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014;30:415–8. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2014.893573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Fadini R, Dal Canto M, Mignini Renzini M, Milani R, Fruscio R, Cantu MG, et al. Embryo transfer following in vitro maturation and cryopreservation of oocytes recovered from antral follicles during conservative surgery for ovarian cancer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29:779–81. doi: 10.1007/s10815-012-9768-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Vanhoutte L, Cortvrindt R, Nogueira D, Smitz J. Effects of chilling on structural aspects of early preantral mouse follicles. Biol Reprod. 2004;70:1041–8. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.020933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Combelles CM, Chateau G. The use of immature oocytes in the fertility preservation of cancer patients: current promises and challenges. Int J Dev Biol. 2012;56:919–29. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.120132cc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Chian RC, Wang Y, Li YR. Oocyte vitrification: advances, progress and future goals. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31:411–20. doi: 10.1007/s10815-014-0180-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Quintans CJ, Donaldson MJ, Urquiza MF, Carretero I, Pasqualini RA, Horton M, et al. Live birth of twins after IVF of oocytes that were cryopreserved almost 12 years before. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;25:600–2. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Huang JY, Chian RC, Gilbert L, Fleiszer D, Holzer H, Dermitas E, et al. Retrieval of immature oocytes from unstimulated ovaries followed by in vitro maturation and vitrification: A novel strategy of fertility preservation for breast cancer patients. Am J Surg. 2010;200:177–83. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Dittrich R, Lotz L, Mueller A, Hoffmann I, Wachter DL, Amann KU, et al. Oncofertility: combination of ovarian stimulation with subsequent ovarian tissue extraction on the day of oocyte retrieval. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2013;11:19. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-11-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Dolmans MM, Marotta ML, Pirard C, Donnez J, Donnez O. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation followed by controlled ovarian stimulation and pick-up of mature oocytes does not impair the number or quality of retrieved oocytes. J Ovarian Res. 2014;7:80. doi: 10.1186/s13048-014-0080-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Soderstrom-Anttila V, Salokorpi T, Pihlaja M, Serenius-Sirve S, Suikkari AM. Obstetric and perinatal outcome and preliminary results of development of children born after in vitro maturation of oocytes. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:1508–13. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Basatemur E, Sutcliffe A. Health of IVM children. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28:489–93. doi: 10.1007/s10815-011-9561-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]