Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1994 Dec 20;91(26):12962–12966. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.26.12962

Direct measurement of stiffness of single actin filaments with and without tropomyosin by in vitro nanomanipulation.

H Kojima 1, A Ishijima 1, T Yanagida 1
PMCID: PMC45560  PMID: 7809155

Abstract

In order to explain the molecular mechanism of muscle contraction, it is crucial to know the distribution of the sarcomere compliance of active muscle. Here, we directly measure the stiffness of single actin filaments with and without tropomyosin, using a recently developed technique for nanomanipulation of single actin filaments with microneedles. The results show that the stiffness for 1-micron-long actin filaments with and without tropomyosin is 65.3 +/- 6.3 and 43.7 +/- 4.6 pN/nm, respectively. When the distribution of crossbridge forces along the actin filament is taken into account, the elongation of a 1-micron-long thin filament during development of isometric contraction is calculated to be approximately 0.23%. The time constant of force in response to a sudden length change is < 0.2 ms, indicating that the viscoelasticity is negligible in the millisecond time range. These results suggest that approximately 50% of the sarcomere compliance of active muscle is due to extensibility of the thin filaments.

Full text

PDF
12962

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bagni M. A., Cecchi G., Colomo F., Poggesi C. Tension and stiffness of frog muscle fibres at full filament overlap. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 1990 Oct;11(5):371–377. doi: 10.1007/BF01739758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ebashi S., Wakabayashi T., Ebashi F. Troponin and its components. J Biochem. 1971 Feb;69(2):441–445. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a129486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ford L. E., Huxley A. F., Simmons R. M. Tension responses to sudden length change in stimulated frog muscle fibres near slack length. J Physiol. 1977 Jul;269(2):441–515. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ford L. E., Huxley A. F., Simmons R. M. The relation between stiffness and filament overlap in stimulated frog muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1981 Feb;311:219–249. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gittes F., Mickey B., Nettleton J., Howard J. Flexural rigidity of microtubules and actin filaments measured from thermal fluctuations in shape. J Cell Biol. 1993 Feb;120(4):923–934. doi: 10.1083/jcb.120.4.923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Goldman Y. E. Measurement of sarcomere shortening in skinned fibers from frog muscle by white light diffraction. Biophys J. 1987 Jul;52(1):57–68. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(87)83188-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. HUXLEY A. F. Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog Biophys Biophys Chem. 1957;7:255–318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HUXLEY H. E. ELECTRON MICROSCOPE STUDIES ON THE STRUCTURE OF NATURAL AND SYNTHETIC PROTEIN FILAMENTS FROM STRIATED MUSCLE. J Mol Biol. 1963 Sep;7:281–308. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(63)80008-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HUXLEY H. E. The double array of filaments in cross-striated muscle. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1957 Sep 25;3(5):631–648. doi: 10.1083/jcb.3.5.631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Harada Y., Sakurada K., Aoki T., Thomas D. D., Yanagida T. Mechanochemical coupling in actomyosin energy transduction studied by in vitro movement assay. J Mol Biol. 1990 Nov 5;216(1):49–68. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80060-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hofmann H., Voss T., Kühn K., Engel J. Localization of flexible sites in thread-like molecules from electron micrographs. Comparison of interstitial, basement membrane and intima collagens. J Mol Biol. 1984 Jan 25;172(3):325–343. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(84)80029-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Holmes K. C., Popp D., Gebhard W., Kabsch W. Atomic model of the actin filament. Nature. 1990 Sep 6;347(6288):44–49. doi: 10.1038/347044a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Huxley A. F., Simmons R. M. Proposed mechanism of force generation in striated muscle. Nature. 1971 Oct 22;233(5321):533–538. doi: 10.1038/233533a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Huxley H. E., Brown W. The low-angle x-ray diagram of vertebrate striated muscle and its behaviour during contraction and rigor. J Mol Biol. 1967 Dec 14;30(2):383–434. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(67)80046-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hvidt S., Nestler F. H., Greaser M. L., Ferry J. D. Flexibility of myosin rod determined from dilute solution viscoelastic measurements. Biochemistry. 1982 Aug 17;21(17):4064–4073. doi: 10.1021/bi00260a024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ishijima A., Doi T., Sakurada K., Yanagida T. Sub-piconewton force fluctuations of actomyosin in vitro. Nature. 1991 Jul 25;352(6333):301–306. doi: 10.1038/352301a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Julian F. J., Morgan D. L. Tension, stiffness, unloaded shortening speed and potentiation of frog muscle fibres at sarcomere lengths below optimum. J Physiol. 1981;319:205–217. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kabsch W., Mannherz H. G., Suck D., Pai E. F., Holmes K. C. Atomic structure of the actin:DNase I complex. Nature. 1990 Sep 6;347(6288):37–44. doi: 10.1038/347037a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kishino A., Yanagida T. Force measurements by micromanipulation of a single actin filament by glass needles. Nature. 1988 Jul 7;334(6177):74–76. doi: 10.1038/334074a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kress M., Huxley H. E., Faruqi A. R., Hendrix J. Structural changes during activation of frog muscle studied by time-resolved X-ray diffraction. J Mol Biol. 1986 Apr 5;188(3):325–342. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90158-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Oosawa F. Actin-actin bond strength and the conformational change of F-actin. Biorheology. 1977;14(1):11–19. doi: 10.3233/bir-1977-14102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. PAGE S. G., HUXLEY H. E. FILAMENT LENGTHS IN STRIATED MUSCLE. J Cell Biol. 1963 Nov;19:369–390. doi: 10.1083/jcb.19.2.369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Phillips G. N., Jr, Fillers J. P., Cohen C. Tropomyosin crystal structure and muscle regulation. J Mol Biol. 1986 Nov 5;192(1):111–131. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90468-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Spudich J. A., Watt S. The regulation of rabbit skeletal muscle contraction. I. Biochemical studies of the interaction of the tropomyosin-troponin complex with actin and the proteolytic fragments of myosin. J Biol Chem. 1971 Aug 10;246(15):4866–4871. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Suezaki Y., Go N. Fluctuations and mechanical strength of alpha-helices of polyglycine and poly(L-alanine). Biopolymers. 1976 Nov;15(11):2137–2153. doi: 10.1002/bip.1976.360151104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tawada K., Kimura M. Stiffness of glycerinated rabbit psoas fibers in the rigor state. Filament-overlap relation. Biophys J. 1984 Mar;45(3):593–602. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(84)84197-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wulf E., Deboben A., Bautz F. A., Faulstich H., Wieland T. Fluorescent phallotoxin, a tool for the visualization of cellular actin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Sep;76(9):4498–4502. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.9.4498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Yanagida T., Nakase M., Nishiyama K., Oosawa F. Direct observation of motion of single F-actin filaments in the presence of myosin. Nature. 1984 Jan 5;307(5946):58–60. doi: 10.1038/307058a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES