Skip to main content
Cancer Science logoLink to Cancer Science
letter
. 2015 Aug 12;106(8):1100. doi: 10.1111/cas.12708

Is repeating FOLFIRINOX in the original dosage and treatment schedule tolerable in Japanese patients with pancreatic cancer?

Yasutsuna Sasaki 1,2,, Kazuyuki Hamada 1, Toshikado Kaneta 1, Takehiro Takahashi 1, Yutaro Kubota 1, Hiroo Ishida 1, Wataru Ichikawa 1
PMCID: PMC4556401  PMID: 26268893

Dear Editor,

The incidence of and mortality from pancreatic cancer are increasing in Japan. Pancreatic cancer remains one of the most serious malignancies.1 Although phase III studies in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer report that overall survival is prolonged by gemcitabine alone2 or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel,3 investigations of new treatment options are essential. Intensive three-drug combination chemotherapy with fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX) can dramatically prolong overall survival in pancreatic cancer.4 FOLFIRINOX was reported in this journal to have favorable efficacy and acceptable toxicity profiles in chemotherapy-naive Japanese patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. However, a critical review of the article indicated that repeating FOLFIRINOX in the original dosage and treatment schedule is intolerable even in selected Japanese patients because the dose intensity of bolus fluorouracil was only 15.4%, and dose reduction and cycle delay were required by 88.9% of the patients.5 The authors should have stressed the need for dose reduction and prolongation of treatment interval. We suppose that the study by Okusaka et al. underestimated toxicity in Japanese patients for several reasons. First, the authors and sponsor of the study did not adequately evaluate the safety of FOLFIRINOX because they did not conduct any phase I dose-escalation studies to determine the optimal dosage of the three drugs. We have reported the results of a phase I study of FOLFOXIRI in patients with colorectal cancer, which used a similar three-drug combination regimen,6 and the recommended dosage was much lower than that in the study by Falcone et al.7 Second, the threshold criteria defining tolerability in the 10 patients were unrealistically higher than the conventional criteria used to define dose-limiting toxicity in phase I trials.6 Third, both the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare and the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devises Agency strongly recommend that new drug applications in Japan should include the identical dosage and regimen used in global or bridging studies.8 Topotecan was approved for the treatment of ovarian cancer in Japan on the basis of a “public knowledge-based application”without conducting large clinical trials; in clinical practice, however, the approved dose is too toxic for Japanese patients with ovarian cancer.9 In conclusion, the dosage and treatment schedule of FOLFIRINOX combination chemotherapy should be more carefully evaluated in Japanese patients with pancreatic cancer treated in a clinical practice setting to avoid severe life-threatening toxic effects.

Disclosure Statement

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. Wakao F, Nishimoto H, Katanoda K, et al. 2013. Tokyo Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research Cancer statistics in Japan (online). [Cited 18 May 2015.] Available from URL: http://ganjoho.jp/pro/statistics/en/backnumber/2013_en.html.
  2. Burris HA, III, Moore MJ, Anderson J, et al. Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:2403–13. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.6.2403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Von Hoff DD, Ervin T, Arena PF, et al. Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1691–703. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1304369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, et al. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1817–25. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Okusaka T, Ikeda M, Fukutomi A, et al. Phase II study of FOLFIRINOX for chemotherapy-naïve Japanese patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Cancer Sci. 2014;105:1321–6. doi: 10.1111/cas.12501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sunakawa Y, Fujita K, Ichikawa W, et al. A phase I study of Infusional 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and irinotecan in Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer who harbor UGT1A1 * 1/* 1, * 1/* 6 or * 1/* 28. Oncology. 2012;82:242–8. doi: 10.1159/000337225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Falcone A, Ricci S, Brunetti I, et al. Phase III trial of infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) compared with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1670–6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.0928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Director of Evaluation and Licensing Division, Pharmaceutical and Food Safety Bureau Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Basic principles on Global Clinical Trials. September 28, 2007, Notification No. 0928010. Available from URL: http://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000157900.pdf.
  9. ten Bokkel Huinink W, Gore M, Carmichael J, et al. Topotecan versus paclitaxel for the treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:2183–93. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.6.2183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cancer Science are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES