Skip to main content
Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research logoLink to Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research
. 2015 Aug 28;21:2553–2556. doi: 10.12659/MSM.894098

miR-142-3p is a Potential Therapeutic Target for Sensory Function Recovery of Spinal Cord Injury

Tianyi Wang 1,2,A,G,*, Wenqi Yuan 1,A,*, Yong Liu 1,A,*, Yanjun Zhang 1,3,F, Zhijie Wang 4,F, Xueming Chen 1,3,E,, Shiqing Feng 1,G,, Yucai Xiu 2,E, Wenhua Li 2,E
PMCID: PMC4557393  PMID: 26318123

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI), which is a leading cause of disability in modern society, commonly results from trauma. It has been reported that application of sciatic nerve conditioning injury plays a positive role in repairing the injury of the ascending spinal sensory pathway in laboratory animals. Because of the complexity of SCI and related ethics challenges, sciatic nerve conditioning injury cannot be applied in clinical therapy. Accordingly, it is extremely important to study its mechanism and develop replacement therapy. Based on empirical study and clinical trials, this article suggests that miR-142-3p is the key therapeutic target for repairing sensory function, based on the following evidence. Firstly, studies have reported that endogenous cAMP is the upstream regulator of 3 signal pathways that are partially involved in the mechanisms of sciatic nerve conditioning injury, promoting neurite growth. The regulated miR-142-3p can induce cAMP elevation via adenylyl cyclase 9 (AC9), which is abundant in dorsal root ganglia (DRG). Secondly, compared with gene expression regulation in the injured spinal cord, inhibition of microRNA (miRNA) in DRG is less likely to cause trauma and infection. Thirdly, evidence of miRNAs as biomarkers and therapeutic targets in many diseases has been reported. In this article we suggest, for the first time, imitating sciatic nerve conditioning injury, thereby enhancing central regeneration of primary sensory neurons via interfering with the congenerous upstream regulator AC9 of the 3 above-mentioned signal pathways. We hope to provide a new clinical treatment strategy for the recovery of sensory function in SCI patients.

MeSH Keywords: 8-Bromo Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate, Adenylate Cyclase, Spinal Cord Injuries

Background

The cost of spinal cord injury (SCI) is enormous emotionally, socially, and financially. The pathophysiology of the SCI is a complex series of reactions of events, responses, and processes, affecting the nervous, vascular, and immune systems [1]. Regardless of whether the spinal cord injury is complete or partial, aberrant sensations, including paresthesia, dysesthesia, and chronic neuropathic pain, always develop within a few months after injury [2]. Aberrant sensations are torturous experience that may make the patients suffer more serious impairments in daily life than dyskinesia alone [3]. Evidence from previous research suggests that aberrant sensations could affect cortical arousal and subsequently induce cognitive deficiency [4] and psychological problems [5]. Some scholars reported that single or combined application of sciatic nerve conditioning injury plays a positive role in repairing the injury to the ascending spinal sensory pathway [6,7]. Due to the complexity of the occurrence of SCI and ethics challenges, sciatic nerve conditioning injury cannot be applied in clinical therapy.

Accordingly, to clinically apply sciatic nerve conditioning injury, it is necessary to investigate and imitate the mechanism and effect of sciatic nerve conditioning injury, promoting repair of dorsal column lesions. Cai et al. [8] reported that cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) causes axonal regeneration on myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) and myelin, accomplished by polyamine synthesis and polyamines, which can further affect cytoskeleton assembly to induce axonal elongation. It has been indicated that cAMP elevation induced by peripheral nerve injury can antagonize the effect of myelin-associated inhibitory molecules via inhibiting Rho and further abolish the cytoskeleton organization inhibition by Rho [9]. Furthermore, IL-6, which can promote neurite growth through activating growth-associated protein 43 (GAP-43), has been validated as one of the downstream signaling pathways of cAMP [10,11]. Thus, cAMP is interesting candidates in studies aimed at stimulating the repair of the ascending spinal sensory pathway [1221]. However, research on administration of exogenous cAMP has had no recent breakthroughs. The elevation of cAMP has 2 deficiencies: time limitation and the limited effect induced by time limitation [22,23]. To overcome these deficiencies, it is necessary to study the molecular biological mechanism of elevated cAMP levels induced by sciatic nerve conditioning injury. It has been shown that miR-142-3p and adenylyl cyclase 9 (AC9) exist in the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) [22]. AC9 converts adenosine-5-triphosphate (ATP) into cAMP and pyrophosphate and this reaction can be regulated by miR-142-3p through targeting AC9 mRNA [24].

Hypothesis

Here, we hypothesize that miR-142-3p is the upstream molecular basis for sciatic nerve transection enhancing central regeneration of primary sensory neurons, and that it is a potential therapeutic target for sensory function recovery of spinal cord injury.

Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate

Previous research has reported 3 signal pathways that partially mediate the mechanisms of sciatic nerve conditioning injury, promoting neurite growth (1). Activated protein kinase A (PKA) activates cAMP response element, binding protein (CREB) [25], which further upregulates transcription of regeneration-related genes such as Arginase I. Arginase I induces the generation of polyamines, which may directly control cytoskeleton assembly or further induce neurite growth on MAG and myelin (Figure 1) [26]. (2) Activation of PKA can antagonize the effect of myelin-associated inhibitory molecules via inhibiting Rho and further abolish the cytoskeleton organization inhibition by Rho (Figure 1) [9] (3). Increased interleukin-6 (IL-6), through STAT3, promotes the expression of regeneration-related genes, for example GAP-43 (Figure 1) [10,26]. The 3 above-mentioned signal pathways have a homo-regulator cAMP. Therefore, it is important to study the regulation of cAMP.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The hypotheses that peripheral axon injury promotes central neurite growth via miR-142-3p. Peripheral axon injury resulted in the elevation of cAMP, a PKA that, when activated by cAMP, further activates CREB. Activated CREB upregulates transcription of Arginase I. Arginase I induces the generation of polyamines, which may directly control cytoskeleton assembly or induce further neurite growth. Activation of PKA also antagonizes MAG- or myelin-derived inhibition via inhibiting Rho. The elevation of cAMP increases IL-6, which promotes the expression of GAP-43 through STAT3.

Blesch et al. proved that the elevation of cAMP occurred as early as 1 day after sciatic nerve conditioning injury and remained elevated 1 week later [27]. Other researchers have indicated that the level of cAMP was increased by 1 day after conditioning injury and decreased to control levels by 1 week after injury [28]. More generally, the limited action time of cAMP results in the limited effect of axonal regeneration, whereas microRNA intervention, which may substitute sciatic nerve conditioning injury, can avoid ethics problems, overcome the above defects, and enhance the effect of axonal regeneration.

miR-142-3p

MicroRNAs (miRNAs), a family of non-coding RNAs, were discovered to regulate gene expression at the translational level by combining with the 3′ untranslated region of target mRNAs, resulting in their degradation or translational inhibition [2931]. The capacity of miRNAs to regulate cell function and state through translationally silencing genes plays a pivotal role in pathophysiology of SCI [1]. Recently, some researchers have begun to focus on miRNAs as biomarkers and therapeutic targets in many diseases [31]. The 2′-O-methyl-modified oligonucleotides are locked nucleic acids (LNA), which is the most common oligonucleotide modification, have been confirmed to be effective inhibitors in primary neurons [30]. Miravirsen, an LNA-modified DNA phosphorothioate antisense oligonucleotide targeting miR-122, has been in phase 2a clinical trials for viral hepatitis type C and may become the miRNA therapeutic target in humans [32].

miR-142-3p is a miRNA that is associated with cell differentiation and development [33,34]. It has been confirmed that the expression of miR-142-3p in DRG was downregulated at 9 h after sciatic nerve conditioning injury and its percent change ranked third in all downregulated miRNAs [22]. It is computationally predicted by TargetScan (http://www.targetscan.org) that AC9, whose expression is abundant in DRG, is the target of miR-142-3p, which has also been confirmed in the literature [24]. cAMP can be produced by intracellular AC9 [24]; therefore, the miR-142-3p/AC9/cAMP signal pathway can efficiently imitate the repair effect of the ascending spinal sensory pathway promoted by sciatic nerve conditioning injury and avoid ethics problems. Compared with gene expression regulation in the injured region of the spinal cord, intervention in DRG causes less trauma and infection and can efficaciously avoid trauma reaction, such as local inflammation and edema, which may inhibit the effect of miRNA intervention. Because a single miRNA may have more than 1 target gene, it is necessary to examine the influence of miR-142-3p on other genes by using mRNA microarray. During administration of miR-142-3p in DRG, it is necessary to avoid injury to the DRG neurons.

Conclusions

The downregulation of miR-142-3p can effectually upregulate the final level of cAMP via upregulating the expression of AC9 in injured neurons of DRG and further regulate the 3 signal pathways simultaneously through inhibition of Rho, activation of CREB, and increase of IL-6. It is a novel regulatory gene of upstream molecular mechanism for sciatic nerve conditioning injury, enhancing central regeneration of primary sensory neurons, and is of potential importance in gene therapy for the sensory function recovery of SCI. To test this hypothesis, further study is needed.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Source of support: This work was supported by the Medical Science and Technology Youth Cultivation Project of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (No. 13QNP017), the Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81330042), the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81371957, 81171714), the Special Project between Ministry of Science and Technology of China and Russia (No. 2014DFR31210), and the Cooperation Project between Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Commission and Australia (No. 13RCGFSY19000)

References

  • 1.Nieto-Diaz M, Esteban FJ, Reigada D, et al. MicroRNA dysregulation in spinal cord injury: causes, consequences and therapeutics. Front Cell Neurosci. 2014;8:53. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2014.00053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hoschouer EL, Finseth T, Flinn S, et al. Sensory stimulation prior to spinal cord injury induces post-injury dysesthesia in mice. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27:777–87. doi: 10.1089/neu.2009.1182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wang W, Wang F, Liu J, et al. SNAP25 Ameliorates Sensory Deficit in Rats with Spinal Cord Transection. Mol Neurobiol. 2014;50:290–304. doi: 10.1007/s12035-014-8642-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Richards JS, Hirt M, Melamed L. Spinal cord injury: a sensory restriction perspective. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1982;63:195–99. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Krishnan KR, Glass CA, Turner SM, et al. Perceptual deprivation in the acute phase of spinal injury rehabilitation. J Am Paraplegia Soc. 1992;15:60–65. doi: 10.1080/01952307.1992.11735863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lu P, Yang H, Jones LL, et al. Combinatorial therapy with neurotrophins and cAMP promotes axonal regeneration beyond sites of spinal cord injury. J Neurosci. 2004;24:6402–9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1492-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Neumann S, Woolf CJ. Regeneration of dorsal column fibers into and beyond the lesion site following adult spinal cord injury. Neuron. 1999;23:83–91. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80755-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cai D, Deng K, Mellado W, et al. Arginase I and polyamines act downstream from cyclic AMP in overcoming inhibition of axonal growth MAG and myelin in vitro. Neuron. 2002;35:711–19. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00826-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Snider WD, Zhou FQ, Zhong J, Markus A. Signaling the pathway to regeneration. Neuron. 2002;35:13–16. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00762-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cao Z, Gao Y, Bryson JB, et al. The cytokine interleukin-6 is sufficient but not necessary to mimic the peripheral conditioning lesion effect on axonal growth. J Neurosci. 2006;26:5565–73. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0815-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cafferty WB, Gardiner NJ, Das P, et al. Conditioning injury-induced spinal axon regeneration fails in interleukin-6 knock-out mice. J Neurosci. 2004;24:4432–43. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2245-02.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hannila SS, Filbin MT. The role of cyclic AMP signaling in promoting axonal regeneration after spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol. 2008;209:321–32. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2007.06.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Peace AG, Shewan DA. New perspectives in cyclic AMP-mediated axon growth and guidance: The emerging epoch of Epac. Brain Res Bull. 2011;84:280–88. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2010.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Corredor RG, Trakhtenberg EF, Pita-Thomas W, et al. Soluble adenylyl cyclase activity is necessary for retinal ganglion cell survival and axon growth. J Neurosci. 2012;32:7734–44. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5288-11.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lu P, Blesch A, Graham L, Wang Y, et al. Motor axonal regeneration after partial and complete spinal cord transection. J Neurosci. 2012;32:8208–18. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0308-12.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dell AL, Fried-Cassorla E, Xu H, Raper JA. cAMP-induced expression of neuropilin1 promotes retinal axon crossing in the zebrafish optic chiasm. J Neurosci. 2013;33:11076–88. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0197-13.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hannila SS, Siddiq MM, Carmel JB, et al. Secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor reverses inhibition by CNS myelin, promotes regeneration in the optic nerve, and suppresses expression of the transforming growth factor-beta signaling protein Smad2. J Neurosci. 2013;33:5138–51. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5321-12.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lau BY, Fogerson SM, Walsh RB, Morgan JR. Cyclic AMP promotes axon regeneration, lesion repair and neuronal survival in lampreys after spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol. 2013;250:31–42. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2013.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Luo X, Salgueiro Y, Beckerman SR, et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of retinal ganglion cell axon regeneration and pathfinding in whole mouse tissue after injury. Exp Neurol. 2013;247:653–62. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2013.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yin Y, Sun W, Li Z, et al. Effects of combining methylprednisolone with rolipram on functional recovery in adult rats following spinal cord injury. Neurochem Int. 2013;62:903–12. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2013.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hellstrom M, Harvey AR. Cyclic AMP and the regeneration of retinal ganglion cell axons. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2014;56:66–73. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2014.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhou S, Yu B, Qian T, et al. Early changes of microRNAs expression in the dorsal root ganglia following rat sciatic nerve transection. Neurosci Lett. 2011;494:89–93. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.02.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wang X, Hasan O, Arzeno A, et al. Axonal regeneration induced by blockade of glial inhibitors coupled with activation of intrinsic neuronal growth pathways. Exp Neurol. 2012;237:55–69. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2012.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Huang B, Zhao J, Lei Z, et al. miR-142-3p restricts cAMP production in CD4+CD25- T cells and CD4+CD25+ TREG cells by targeting AC9 mRNA. EMBO Rep. 2009;10:180–85. doi: 10.1038/embor.2008.224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gao Y, Deng K, Hou J, et al. Activated CREB is sufficient to overcome inhibitors in myelin and promote spinal axon regeneration in vivo. Neuron. 2004;44:609–21. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.10.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chen ZL, Yu WM, Strickland S. Peripheral regeneration. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2007;30:209–33. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Blesch A, Lu P, Tsukada S, et al. Conditioning lesions before or after spinal cord injury recruit broad genetic mechanisms that sustain axonal regeneration: superiority to camp-mediated effects. Exp Neurol. 2012;235:162–73. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.12.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Qiu J, Cai D, Dai H, et al. Spinal axon regeneration induced by elevation of cyclic AMP. Neuron. 2002;34:895–903. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00730-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bhalala OG, Pan L, Sahni V, et al. microRNA-21 regulates astrocytic response following spinal cord injury. J Neurosci. 2012;32:17935–47. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3860-12.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liu NK, Xu XM. MicroRNA in central nervous system trauma and degenerative disorders. Physiol Genomics. 2011;43:571–80. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00168.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Williams AE. Functional aspects of animal microRNAs. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2008;65:545–62. doi: 10.1007/s00018-007-7355-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Janssen HL, Reesink HW, Lawitz EJ, et al. Treatment of HCV infection by targeting microRNA. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1685–94. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lagos-Quintana M, Rauhut R, Yalcin A, et al. Identification of tissue-specific microRNAs from mouse. Curr Biol. 2002;12:735–39. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00809-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Houbaviy HB, Murray MF, Sharp PA. Embryonic stem cell-specific MicroRNAs. Dev Cell. 2003;5:351–58. doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(03)00227-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research are provided here courtesy of International Scientific Information, Inc.

RESOURCES