Skip to main content
PeerJ logoLink to PeerJ
. 2015 Aug 11;3:e1159. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1159

Development and characterization of microsatellite loci for the haploid–diploid red seaweed Gracilaria vermiculophylla

Nicole M Kollars 1,5,#, Stacy A Krueger-Hadfield 1,#, James E Byers 2, Thomas W Greig 3, Allan E Strand 1, Florian Weinberger 4, Erik E Sotka 1,
Editor: Rita Castilho
PMCID: PMC4558075  PMID: 26339541

Abstract

Microsatellite loci are popular molecular markers due to their resolution in distinguishing individual genotypes. However, they have rarely been used to explore the population dynamics in species with biphasic life cycles in which both haploid and diploid stages develop into independent, functional organisms. We developed microsatellite loci for the haploid–diploid red seaweed Gracilaria vermiculophylla, a widespread non-native species in coastal estuaries of the Northern hemisphere. Forty-two loci were screened for amplification and polymorphism. Nine of these loci were polymorphic across four populations of the extant range with two to eleven alleles observed. Mean observed and expected heterozygosities ranged from 0.265 to 0.527 and 0.317 to 0.387, respectively. Overall, these markers will aid in the study of the invasive history of this seaweed and further studies on the population dynamics of this important haploid–diploid primary producer.

Keywords: Complex life cycles, Biological invasions, Seaweed, Microsatellites, Haploid-diploid, Gracilaria vermiculophylla

Introduction

In the last decade, genetic approaches to answering evolutionary and ecological questions have become less expensive and more easily applied to non-model species (Allendorf, Hohenlohe & Luikart, 2010; Guichoux et al., 2011). Microsatellites, or tandem repeats of two to six nucleotides, are popular molecular markers due to their resolution in distinguishing individual genotypes (Selkoe & Toonen, 2006) and their ability to describe patterns of population connectivity across landscapes (Manel et al., 2003) and seascapes (Galindo, Olson & Palumbi, 2006). Much of the literature focuses on organisms with single free-living diploid stages (i.e., animals and higher plants). Yet, there are many species with both haploid and diploid stages in the same life cycle in which both ploidies undergo somatic development and live as independent, functional organisms.

While theory predicts that selection should favor either diploidy or haploidy (Mable & Otto, 1998), Hughes & Otto (1999) demonstrated the maintenance of both haploid and diploid stages when the two stages occupy different ecological niches. However, there are relatively few empirical tests of these alternative hypotheses (but see Destombe et al., 1992; Thornber & Gaines, 2004; Guillemin et al., 2013), and for isomorphic species in which ploidy is not easily identified through morphological traits, molecular markers will be essential to advance research in this field. These same markers can additionally be used to understand connectivity and demographic history in haploid–diploid populations. Among marine haploid–diploid macroalgae, relatively few microsatellites have been developed to address any of these issues (but see Table 1).

Table 1. Studies in which both the haploid and diploid stages of seaweeds and mosses were investigated to reveal patterns in genetic structure and mating system.

Phylum Species Marker Type of study
Sosa et al. (1998) Rhodophyta Gelidium arbuscula Isozymes Genetic structure and mating system
Sosa et al. (1998) Rhodophyta Gelidium canariensis Isozymes Genetic structure and mating system
Engel et al. (1999) Rhodophyta Gracilaria gracilis Microsatellites Paternity analyses and dispersal
van der Velde et al. (2001) Bryophyta Polytrichum formosum Microsatellites Paternity analyses and dispersal
van der Strate et al. (2002) Chlorophyta Cladophoropsis membranacea Microsatellites Shorescape structure and mating system
Engel, Destombe & Valero (2004) Rhodophyta Gracilaria gracilis Microsatellites Shorescape structure and mating system
Guillemin et al. (2008a) and Guillemin et al. (2008b) Rhodophyta Gracilaria chilensis Microsatellites Genetic structure, mating system and comparisons between natural and farmed populations
Szövényi, Ricca & Shaw (2009) Bryophyta Sphagnum lescurii Microsatellites Paternity analyses and dispersal
Alström-Rapaport, Leskinen & Pamilo (2010) Chlorophyta Ulva intenstinalis Microsatellites Genetic structure and mating system
Krueger-Hadfield et al. (2011) Rhodophyta Chondrus crispus Microsatellites Genetic structure and mating system
Krueger-Hadfield et al. (2013) Rhodophyta Chondrus crispus Microsatellites Shorescape structure and mating system
Couceiro et al. (2015) Ochrophyta Ecotcarpus crouaniorum Microsatellites Genetic structure and mating system
Couceiro et al. (2015) Ochrophyta Ectocarpus siliculosus Microsatellites Genetic structure and mating system
Krueger-Hadfield et al. (2015) Rhodophyta Chondrus crispus Microsatellites Paternity analyses and dispersal

Understanding the consequences of biphasic life cycles and land- or seascape features on population structure is particularly relevant in light of the increasing frequency of biological introductions. There are numerous examples of widespread, and putatively invasive species, that have free-living haploid and diploid stages, including macroalgae (e.g., Asparagopsis spp.; Andreakis et al., 2007), ferns (e.g., Lygodium spp.; Lott et al., 2003) and mosses (e.g., Campylopus introflexus; Schirmel, Timler & Buchholz, 2010). Macroalgae, or seaweeds, account for approximately 20% of the world’s introduced marine species (Andreakis & Schaffelke, 2012) and a subset of these invasions are by species that are exploited in their native range, either for the phycocolloid industry or as food products (Williams & Smith, 2007).

The red seaweed Gracilaria vermiculophylla (Omhi) Papenfuss is native to the northwest Pacific and, in the last 30–40 years, has spread throughout high to medium salinity estuaries of the eastern North Pacific (Saunders, 2009), the western North Atlantic (Byers et al., 2012) and the eastern North Atlantic (Weinberger et al., 2008; Guillemin et al., 2008a). G. vermiculophylla transforms the ecosystems into which it is introduced through negative impacts on native species (e.g., direct competition, Hammann et al., 2013), the addition of structural complexity to soft-bottom systems (e.g., Nyberg, Thomsen & Wallentinus, 2009; Wright et al., 2014) and the alteration of community structure, species interactions and detrital pathways (e.g., Byers et al., 2012). Previous studies of the population genetics of G. vermiculophylla focused on the mitochondrial gene cytochrome b oxidase I (Kim, Weinberger & Boo, 2010; Gulbransen et al., 2012), but mitochondrial genetics do not necessarily predict the population genetics of the nuclear genome and cannot assess patterns of ploidy and mating system. Thus, we developed nine polymorphic microsatellite loci for G. vermiculophylla.

Materials and Methods

A library of contigs for G. vermiculophylla was generated using the 454 next-generation sequencing platform (Cornell University Life Sciences Core Laboratory Center) from a single individual collected from Charleston, South Carolina, USA. For library preparation, DNA was extracted using CTAB (Eichenberger, Gugerli & Schneller, 2000) and library construction followed Hamilton et al. (1999). Dimeric to hexameric microsatellite repeats were identified with the program MSATCOMMANDER, ver 1.0.8 (Faircloth, 2008) and primers were designed using PRIMER 3 (Rozen & Skalesty, 2000) for contigs with at least four sequences present in the library. Bioinformatics of these sequences was facilitated by the APE package (Paradis, Claude & Strimmer, 2004) in R (R Development Core Team, 2014).

Total genomic DNA was isolated using 120 µL of a 10% Chelex solution (BioRad Laboratories, Hercules, California, USA) in which approximately 1 cm of dried algal tissue was heated at 95 °C for 30 min and vortexed intermittently (Walsh, Metzger & Higuchi, 1991). Loci were amplified on a thermocycler (BioRad) as follows: 10 µL final volume, 2 µL of stock DNA template, 0.5 units of GoTAQ Flexi-DNA Polymerase (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), 1X buffer, 250 µM of each dNTP, 1.5 nM of MgCl2, 150 nM of fluorescently-labeled forward primer, 100 nM of unlabeled forward primer and 250 nM of unlabeled reverse primer. The PCR program included 2 min at 95 °C, 30 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 55 °C and 30 s at 72 °C, and a final 5 min at 72 °C. One µL of each PCR product was added to 10 µL of loading buffer containing 0.35 µL of size standard (GeneScan500 Liz; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA). Samples were electrophoresed on an ABI 3130xL genetic analyzer equipped with 36 cm capillaries (Applied Biosystems). Alleles were scored manually using GENEMAPPER ver. 4 (Applied Biosystems) and allele sizes were binned with TANDEM ver. 1.08 software (Matschiner & Saltzburger, 2009; Krueger-Hadfield et al., 2013).

We screened a total of 42 primer pairs for amplification and polymorphism in G. vermiculophylla (Table 2, Table S1). For the amplifiable loci that also showed polymorphism (nine total, see “Results and Discussion”), we verified single locus genetic determinism (SGLD). Loci were in SLGD if known haploids produced a single allele and diploids produced either one or two alleles in their homozygous or heterozygous state, respectively. We verified SGLD in a subset of known haploid gametophytes (n = 28) and diploid tetrasporophytes (n = 30) collected at Elkhorn Slough, California, USA (Table 3, Fig. S1). Elkhorn Slough was the only population for which ploidy was determined by reproductive structures and for which we had known haploids and diploids for genotyping.

Table 2. Characteristics of nine polymorphic microsatellite loci developed for Gracilaria vermiculophylla.

Acc. No., GenBank accession number; locus; motif; primer sequences; allele range; avg. error: TANDEM (Matschiner & Saltzburger, 2009) rounding errors for each microsatellite locus (the authors of TANDEM suggest that good loci have an average rounding error which is below 10% of the repeat size); Ntall, total number of alleles. All loci showed one-locus genetic determinism.

Locus Acc. No. Motif Primer sequence Allele range Avg. Error N tall
Gverm_5276 KT232089 (AC)10 F: GGAGAGCAGCACGTTTTAGG R: CTGCTTAGTTCCACGATCGAC 282–316 0.14 11
Gverm_6311 KT232090 (AG)9 F: GCGTCATTCCACTGAATGTG R: GATGAACCTCAATGCCTCGT 203–223 0.17 6
Gverm_8036 KT232091 (AC)12 F: GCCCTTTTAAGGATGCAACA R: GGGGTAAACGACCACAGAGA 213–251 0.14 5
Gverm_3003 KT232092 (AG)11 F: CATCTTGCTTCCTTGCTTCC R: TTGAAAGCCGGAATTTATCG 198–230 0.11 4
Gverm_1203 KT232093 (AAG)8 F: CTCCTGGTGCACAAGCAATA R: ACATTCTGCGCACCTTTCTT 284–308 0.12 4
Gverm_1803 KT232094 (AC)11 F: GCGTGCACGATGTCTACACT R: GACAGCAACAAGTGGGGTTT 352–356 0.07 3
Gverm_804 KT232095 (AAG)8 F: TGTAGGATTGCTCTCCTGGTG R: CAGGCTGGCCAAAATAACAT 182–188 0.16 3
Gverm_10367 KT232096 (AG)8 F: GCTGAGAAATGAAGCGAAGG R: GCAAACCTGCCTTGTTTGTT 198–200 0.07 2
Gverm_2790 KT232097 (AATGC)5 F: GAACAATGCGGGAAAACATT R: GGAAGAGGCTCAAAAGCAGA 262–267 0.16 2

Table 3. Location of the four populations used to test for polymorphism in newly characterized microsatellite loci in Gracilaria vermiculophylla.

The region, range (native or non-native), latitude, longitude, sampling date, collector* and ploidy determination (using reproductive phenology or microsatellite genotype) are provided.

Population Region Range Latitude Longitude Date Collector Ploidy determination
Akkeshi, Japan NW Pacific Native 43.04774 144.9498 25 Aug 10, 31 Jul 12 NMK, KH, KM, AP, MS Genotype
Elkhorn Slough California, USA NE Pacific Non-native 36.50447 −121.4513 3 Nov 13 SAKH, BFK, TDK, BH Genotype, phenology
Fort Johnson SC, USA NW Atlantic Non-native 32.7513 −79.900 11 Dec 13 CEG Genotype
Nordstrand, Germany North Sea Non-native 54.454571 8.874846 24 Mar 10 MH Genotype

Notes.

Collector abbreviations

NMK
NM Kollars
KH
K Honda
KM
K Momota
AP
A Pansch
MS
M Sato
SAKH
SA Krueger-Hadfield
BFK
BF Krueger
TDK
TD Krueger
BH
B Hughes
CEG
CE Gerstenmaier
MH:
M Hammann

The frequency of null alleles was estimated in the haploid subpopulation from Elkhorn Slough as well as diploid tetrasporophytes for each of the four populations (Table 3). It is possible to calculate the null allele frequency directly in the haploids based on the number of non-amplification events, after discounting technical errors. For diploid tetrasporophytes, we used a maximum likelihood estimator (ML-NullFreq: Kalinowski & Taper, 2006).

Next, we screened loci for short allele dominance (Wattier et al., 1998). The presence of short allele dominance is rarely tested during microsatellite development, even though it can result in artificial heterozygote deficiencies. In contrast to null alleles, primer binding is successful, but the larger allele is not amplified due to the preferential amplification of the smaller allele. Wattier et al. (1998) demonstrated an analytical method to detect short allele dominance using linear models. If a regression of allele-specific Fis (inbreeding coefficient) statistics on allele size reveals a significant negative slope, then short allele dominance may be expected. We determined three to four allele size classes per locus and performed linear regressions using the STATS package in R (R Development Core Team, 2014).

To provide preliminary assessment of the genotypic and genetic diversity one can gain from these loci, we genotyped diploid tetrasporophytes from one native and three non-native populations of G. vermiculophylla (Table 3). Diploids were identified based either on reproductive phenology (Elkhorn) or microsatellite genotype (after assuring SGLD) if at least one locus was heterozygous (Akkeshi, Fort Johnson and Nordstrand, Table 3).

We calculated expected allelic richness using rarefaction in order to account for differences in sample size (HP-Rare; Kalinowski, 2005). Observed (HO) and expected heterozygosities (HE) were calculated using GenAlEx, ver. 6.501 (Peakall & Smouse, 2006; Peakall & Smouse, 2012). Tests for Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium and F-statistics were performed in FSTAT, ver. 2.9.3.2 (Goudet, 1995). Fis was calculated for each locus and over all loci according to Weir & Cockerham (1984) and significance (at the adjusted nominal level of 0.001) was tested by running 1,000 permutations of alleles among individuals within samples. We also tested for linkage disequilibrium in each population using GENEPOP, ver. 4.2.2 (Rousset, 2008), with 1,000 permutations followed by Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons (Sokal & Rohlf, 1995).

Results and Discussion

Of the 42 loci screened, 16 did not amplify for G. vermiculophylla even after several PCR modifications (Table S1). Of the remaining 26 loci, four loci exhibited multi-peak profiles and were discarded from further use, 13 loci were considered monomorphic (Table S1), and nine loci showed polymorphism (Table 2). The nine polymorphic loci exhibited SLGD in which known haploids always exhibited one allele. The low number of polymorphic loci revealed from this screening process is consistent with previous efforts to develop microsatellite loci for some seaweeds (e.g., Varlea-Álvarez et al., 2011; Arnaud-Haond et al., 2013).

The frequency of null alleles was zero at all loci except Gverm_1803 and Gverm_2790 in which the frequencies were both 0.019 in the haploids at Elkhorn Slough (Table S2). The only evidence of null alleles in the diploids from Elkhorn Slough was at locus Gverm_1803, with a maximum likelihood estimated frequency of 0.115. The discrepancy between the haploid and diploid estimates is likely due to assumptions underlying the maximum likelihood estimators implemented in software like HP-Rare (Kalinowski, 2005), such as random mating. Krueger-Hadfield et al. (2013) demonstrated a strong bias in the estimates of null allele frequency when using these maximum likelihood estimators in macroalgal populations that have undergone non-random mating. The higher frequencies of null alleles (0.115–0.207) in the Akkeshi diploid subpopulation were most likely driven by a violation of these assumptions as well, though empirical estimates in haploid subpopulations are warranted. Nevertheless, the low frequency of null alleles and lack of evidence for short-allele dominance (all regression p-values were >0.2, Table S3), suggest that observed heterozygote deficiencies using these loci will be due to the mating system or spatial substructuring (Guillemin et al., 2008b; Krueger-Hadfield et al., 2011; Krueger-Hadfield et al., 2013).

Previous studies have used microsatellite loci to distinguish among individual clones and to describe the genetic diversity and the mating systems of seaweed populations despite low levels of polymorphism (e.g., Guillemin et al., 2008b; Arnaud-Haond et al., 2013). In the current study, the nine polymorphic markers described genetic variability in four populations sampled across the extant distribution of G. vermiculophylla. Overall, there was little evidence for linkage disequilibrium after Bonferroni correction (Table S4). Additionally, allelic diversity was comparable among the one native and three non-native sites we sampled, but Fis varied considerably (summary in Table 4; per locus statistics in Table S5). Together, these results suggest that unique demographic and evolutionary processes could be operating between native and non-native ranges and within each population, but more detailed sampling is needed to address these patterns.

Table 4. Genetic features of four populations of Gracilaria vermicuolphylla.

These include: the sample size, N; the diploid genotypic richness, NA, + standard error (SE); mean allelic richness, AE, based on the smallest sample size of 46 alleles (23 diploid individuals) + SE; mean observed heterozygosity, HO, + SE; mean expected heterozygosity, HE, + SE; inbreeding oefficient, Fis, multilocus and per locus estimates.

Statistics Akkeshi Elkhorn slough Fort Johnson Nordstrand
N 31 30 38 23
NA 3.2 ± 0.5 2.2 ± 0.4 2.0 ± 0.2 1.9 ± 0.2
AE 3.1 ± 0.4 2.2 ± 0.3 2.0 ± 0.2 1.9 ± 0.2
HO 0.265 ± 0.060 0.311 ± 0.089 0.520 ± 0.110 0.527 ± 0.125
HE 0.374 ± 0.079 0.317 ± 0.084 0.387 ± 0.077 0.352 ± 0.079
Fis 0.294 * 0.017 −0.350 * −0.512 *
F is per locus
Gverm_5276 0.484 * 0.120 −0.209 −0.492
Gverm_6311 0.435 * 0.140 −0.267 −0.048
Gverm_8036 0.334 NA −0.445 * −0.217
Gverm_3003 0.529 −0.121 −0.138 −0.553
Gverm_1203 −0.15 −0.206 −0.310 −0.508
Gverm_1803 0.569 * 0.460 −0.696 * NA
Gverm_804 −0.278 −0.206 −0.310 −0.508
Gverm_10367 −0.017 NA NA NA
Gverm_2790 NA NA NA −0.913*

Notes.

*

p < 0.001, adjusted nominal value.

In summary, we have developed and characterized microsatellite markers for the haploid–diploid red seaweed G. vermiculophylla. These loci have the resolution to distinguish individual thalli and will aid studies on the invasive history of G. vermiculophylla, as well as the evolutionary ecology of rapidly spreading populations and mating system shifts in organisms that have biphasic life cycles with free-living haploid and diploid stages (i.e., macroalgae, ferns, mosses and some fungi).

Supplemental Information

Figure S1. Reproductive phenology of (A) haploid female gametophytes, (B) haploid male gametophytes (50x) and (C) diploid tetrasporophytes (50x).

Gracilaria vermiculophylla exhibits a complex haploid–diploid life cycle, including two free-living stages of different ploidy levels: the haploid dioecious gametophytes and the diploid tetrasporophytes. Fertilization takes place on the female gametophyte, and the female gametes, once fertilized, develop into cystocarps, an additional, though not a free-living, stage. The cystocarp is a macroscopic swelling on the surface of the female thallus, within which the zygote is mitotically copied producing thousands of diploid spores, called carpospores. Spores released from the cystocarps germinate into the diploid tetrasporophytes. (Photo credit: SA Krueger-Hadfield).

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1159/supp-1
Table S1. Characteristics of 33 microsatellite loci developed for Gracilaria vermiculophylla that showed monomorphism, non-amplification, or multi-locus genetic determinism.

Acc. No., GenBank accession number; locus; motif; primer sequences; Profile: one- or multi-locus genetic determinism, no amp. indicates non-amplification; Ntall total number of alleles.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1159/supp-2
Table S2. Null allele frequencies for the microsatellite loci developed for Gracilaria vermiculophylla.

Frequencies were directly estimated in the haploid subpopulations, whereas frequencies in each of the diploid subpopulations at Akkeshi, Elkhorn Slough, Fort Johnson and Nordstrand were calculated using maximum likelihood and the software MLNullFreq (Kalinowski & Taper, 2006).

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1159/supp-3
Table S3. Short allele dominance analysis for microsatellite loci developed for Gracilaria vermiculophylla.

This includes number of pooled size classes used in regression analysis (following Wattier et al., 1998), No. of classes, and linear regression statistics. Loci Gverm_10367 and Gverm_2790 only exhibited two alleles in our sampled populations and consequently, short allele dominance analysis was not applicable (NA).

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1159/supp-4
Table S4. Linkage disequilibrium analysis for microsatellite loci developed for Gracilaria vermiculophylla.

Darkened cells indicate pairs of loci that show significant linkage disequilibrium after Bonferroni correction (p-value threshold < 0.006 at α = 0.05).

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1159/supp-5
Table S5. Genetic features per locus of four populations of Gracilaria vermiculophylla.

This includes: number of alleles at each locus, NA, + standard error (SE); mean allelic richness, AE, based on the smallest global sample size of 46 alleles (23 diploid individuals) + SE; mean observed heterozygosity, HO, + SE; mean expected heterozygosity, HE, + SE.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1159/supp-6
Supplemental Information 1. Development and characterization of microsatellite loci for the haploid–diploid red seaweed Gracilaria vermiculophylla.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1159/supp-7

Acknowledgments

Thanks to TM Bell, E Buchanan, CE Gerstenmaier, M Hammann, K Honda, B Hughes, BF Krueger, TD Krueger, K Momota, M Nakaoka, A Pansch, T Roth and M Sato for field and laboratory support.

Funding Statement

This project was supported by NSF OCE-1057707 to JEB, OCE-1057713 to EES and OCE-1357386 to EES, SAKH and AES, as well as College of Charleston Graduate Research Grants, a Phycological Society of America Grants-in-Aid-of-Research Fellowship, and the Zostera Experimental Network Graduate Research Fellowship (NSF OCE-1031061 to JE Duffy) to NMK. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The scientific results and conclusions, as well as any opinions expressed herein, are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of NOAA or the Department of Commerce. The mention of any commercial product is not meant as an endorsement by the Agency or Department. We have no competing interest.

Author Contributions

Nicole M. Kollars conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables.

Stacy A. Krueger-Hadfield performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables.

James E. Byers and Allan E. Strand conceived and designed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Thomas W. Greig contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Florian Weinberger contributed samples and reviewed the paper.

Erik E. Sotka conceived and designed the experiments, wrote the paper.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

GenBank accession numbers can be found in Table 2.

References

  • Allendorf, Hohenlohe & Luikart (2010).Allendorf FW, Hohenlohe PA, Luikart G. Genomics and the future of conservation genetics. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2010;11:697–709. doi: 10.1038/nrg2844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Alström-Rapaport, Leskinen & Pamilo (2010).Alström-Rapaport C, Leskinen E, Pamilo P. Seasonal variation in the mode of reproduction of Ulva intestinalis in a brackish water environment. Aquatic Botany. 2010;93:244–249. doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2010.08.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Andreakis et al. (2007).Andreakis N, Procaccini G, Maggs C, Kooistra WHCF. Phylogeography of the invasive seaweed Asparagopsis (Bonnemaisoniales, Rhodophyta) reveals cryptic diversity. Molecular Ecology. 2007;16:2285–2299. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03306.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Andreakis & Schaffelke (2012).Andreakis N, Schaffelke B. Ecological studies. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2012. Invasive marine seaweeds: pest or prize? pp. 235–262. [Google Scholar]
  • Arnaud-Haond et al. (2013).Arnaud-Haond S, Candeias R, Serrão EA, Teixeira SJL. Microsatellite markers developed through pyrosequencing allow clonal discrimination in the invasive alga Caulerpa taxifolia. Conservation Genetics. 2013;5:667–669. doi: 10.1007/s12686-013-9878-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Byers et al. (2012).Byers JE, Gribben PE, Yeager C, Sotka EE. Impacts of an abundant introduced ecosystem engineer within mudflats of the southeastern US coast. Biological Invasions. 2012;149:2587–2600. doi: 10.1007/s10530-012-0254-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Couceiro et al. (2015).Couceiro L, Le Gac M, Hunsperger HM, Mauger S, Destombe C, Cock JM, Ahmed S, Coelho SM, Valero M, Peters AF. Evolution and maintenance of haploid–diploid life cycles in natural populations: the case of the marine brown alga Ecotcarpus. Evolution. 2015;69(7):1808–1822. doi: 10.1111/evo.12702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Destombe et al. (1992).Destombe C, Godin J, Lefèvre CM, Dehorter O, Vernet P. Differences in dispersal abilities of haploid and diploid spores of Gracilaria verrucosa (Gracilariales, Rhodophyta) Botanica Marina. 1992;35:93–98. doi: 10.1515/botm.1992.35.2.93. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Eichenberger, Gugerli & Schneller (2000).Eichenberger K, Gugerli F, Schneller JJ. Morphological and molecular diversity of Swiss common bean cultivars (Phaseolus vulgaris L., Fabaceae) and their origin. Botanica Helvectia. 2000;110:61–77. [Google Scholar]
  • Engel, Destombe & Valero (2004).Engel CR, Destombe C, Valero M. Mating system and gene flow in the red seaweed Gracilaria gracilis: effect of haploid–diploid life history and intertidal rocky shore landscape on fine-scale genetic structure. Heredity. 2004;92:289–298. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Engel et al. (1999).Engel CR, Wattier RA, Destombe C, Valero M. Performance of non-motile male gametes in the sea: analysis of paternity and fertilization success in a natural population of a red seaweed, Gracilaria gracilis. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 1999;266:1879–1886. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0861. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Faircloth (2008).Faircloth BC. MSATCOMMANDER: detection of microsatellite repeat arrays and automated, locus-specific primer design. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2008;8:92–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01884.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Galindo, Olson & Palumbi (2006).Galindo HM, Olson DB, Palumbi SR. Seascape genetics: a coupled oceanographic-genetic model predicts population structure of Caribbean corals. Current Biology. 2006;16:1622–1626. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.06.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Goudet (1995).Goudet J. FSTAT (version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-Statistics. Journal of Heredity. 1995;86:485–486. [Google Scholar]
  • Guichoux et al. (2011).Guichoux E, Lagache L, Wagner S, Chaumeil P, Leger P, Lepais O, Lepoittevin C, Malausa T, Revardel E, Salin F, Petit RJ. Current trends in microsatellite genotyping. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2011;11:591–611. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03014.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Guillemin et al. (2008a).Guillemin ML, Akki SA, Givernaud T, Mouradi A, Valero M, Destombe C. Molecular characterisation and development of rapid molecular methods to identify species of Gracilariaceae from the Atlantic coast of Morocco. Aquatic Botany. 2008a;89:324–330. doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2008.03.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Guillemin et al. (2008b).Guillemin ML, Faugeron S, Destombe C, Viard F, Correa JA, Valero M. Genetic variation in wild and cultivated populations of the haploid–diploid red alga Gracilaria chiensis: how farming practices favor asexual reproduction and heterozygosity. Evolution. 2008b;62:1500–1519. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00373.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Guillemin et al. (2013).Guillemin ML, Sepúlveda RD, Correa JA, Destombe C. Differential ecological responses to environmental stress in the life history phases of the isomorphic red alga Gracilaria chilensis (Rhodophyta) Journal of Applied Phycology. 2013;25:215–224. doi: 10.1007/s10811-012-9855-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Gulbransen et al. (2012).Gulbransen DJ, McGlathery KJ, Marklund M, Norris JN, Gurgel CFD. Gracilaria vermiculophylla (Rhodophyta, Gracilariales) in the Virginia coastal bays, USA: COX1 analysis reveals high genetic richness of an introduced macroalga. Journal of Phycology. 2012;48:1278–1283. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2012.01218.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hamilton et al. (1999).Hamilton MB, Pincus EL, Di-Fiore A, Fleischer RC. Universal linker and ligation procedures for construction of genomic DNA libraries enriched for microsatellites. Biotechniques. 1999;27:500–507. doi: 10.2144/99273st03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hammann et al. (2013).Hammann M, Buchholz B, Karez R, Weinberger F. Direct and indirect effects of Gracilaria vermiculophylla on native Fucus vesiculosus. Aquatic Invasions. 2013;8:121–132. doi: 10.3391/ai.2013.8.2.01. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Hughes & Otto (1999).Hughes JS, Otto SP. Ecology and the evolution of biphasic life cycles. The American Naturalist. 1999;154:306–320. doi: 10.1086/303241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kalinowski (2005).Kalinowski ST. HP-RARE 1.0: a computer program for performing rarefaction on measures of allelic richness. Molecular Ecology Notes. 2005;5:187–189. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00845.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Kalinowski & Taper (2006).Kalinowski ST, Taper ML. Maximum likelihood estimation of the frequency of null alleles at microsatellite loci. Conservation Genetics. 2006;7:991–995. doi: 10.1007/s10592-006-9134-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Kim, Weinberger & Boo (2010).Kim SY, Weinberger F, Boo SM. Genetic data hint at a common donor region for invasive Atlantic and Pacific populations of Gracilaria vermiculophylla (Gracilariales, Rhodophyta) Journal of Phycology. 2010;46:1346–1349. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2010.00905.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Krueger-Hadfield et al. (2011).Krueger-Hadfield SA, Collen J, Daguin-Thiébaut C, Valero M. Genetic population structure and mating system in Chondrus crispus (Rhodophyta) Journal of phycology. 2011;47:440–450. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2011.00995.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Krueger-Hadfield et al. (2015).Krueger-Hadfield SA, Roze D, Correa JA, Destombe C, Valero M. O father where art thou? Paternity analyses in a natural population of the haploid–diploid seaweed Chondrus crispus. Heredity. 2015;114:185–194. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2014.82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Krueger-Hadfield et al. (2013).Krueger-Hadfield SA, Roze D, Mauger S, Valero M. Intergametophytic selfing and microgeographic genetic structure shape populations of the intertidal red seaweed Chondrus crispus. Molecular Ecology. 2013;22:3242–3260. doi: 10.1111/mec.12191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lott et al. (2003).Lott MS, Volin JC, Pemberton JM, Austin DF. The reproductive biology of the invasive ferns Lygodium microphyllum and L. japonicum (Schizaeaceae): implications for invasive potential. American Journal of Botany. 2003;90:1144–1152. doi: 10.3732/ajb.90.8.1144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mable & Otto (1998).Mable BK, Otto SP. The evolution of life cycles with haploid and diploid phases. BioEssays. 1998;20:453–462. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199806)20:6&#x0003c;453::AID-BIES3&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-N. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Manel et al. (2003).Manel S, Schwartz MK, Luikart G, Taberlet P. Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2003;18:189–197. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00008-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Matschiner & Saltzburger (2009).Matschiner M, Saltzburger W. TANDEM: integrating automated allele binning into genetics and genomics workflows. Bioniformatics Applications Note. 2009;25:1982–1983. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nyberg, Thomsen & Wallentinus (2009).Nyberg CD, Thomsen MS, Wallentinus I. Flora and fauna associated with the introduced red alga Gracilaria vermiculophylla. European Journal of Phycology. 2009;44:395–403. doi: 10.1080/09670260802592808. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Paradis, Claude & Strimmer (2004).Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics. 2004;20:289–290. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Peakall & Smouse (2006).Peakall R, Smouse PE. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes. 2006;6:288–295. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Peakall & Smouse (2012).Peakall R, Smouse PE. GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research–an update. Bioinformatics Applications Note. 2012;28:2537–2539. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • R Development Core Team (2014).R Development Core Team . R version 2.15.1. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2014. Available at http://www.R-project.org/ [Google Scholar]
  • Rousset (2008).Rousset F. GENEPOP’007: a complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2008;8:103–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01931.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rozen & Skalesty (2000).Rozen S, Skalesty HJ. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In: Krawetz SMS, editor. Bioinfomatics methods and protocols: methods ins molecular biology. Totowa: Human Press; 2000. pp. 365–386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Saunders (2009).Saunders GW. Routine DNA barcoding of Canadian Gracilariales (Rhodophyta) reveals the invasive species Gracilaria vermiculophylla in British Columbia. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2009;9:140–150. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02639.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Schirmel, Timler & Buchholz (2010).Schirmel J, Timler L, Buchholz S. Impact of the invasive moss Campylopus introflexus on carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and spiders (Araneae) in acidic coastal dunes at the southern Baltic Sea. Biological Invasions. 2010;13:605–620. doi: 10.1007/s10530-010-9852-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Selkoe & Toonen (2006).Selkoe KA, Toonen RJ. Microsatellites for ecologists: a practical guide to using and evaluating microsatellite markers. Ecology Letters. 2006;9:615–629. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00889.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sokal & Rohlf (1995).Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. New York: WH Freeman and Company; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • Sosa et al. (1998).Sosa PA, Valero M, Batista F, Gonzalez-Perez MA. Genetic variation and genetic structure of natural populations of Gelidium species: a re-evaluation of results. Journal of Phycology. 1998;10:279–284. doi: 10.1023/A:1008092023549. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Szövényi, Ricca & Shaw (2009).Szövényi P, Ricca M, Shaw AJ. Multiple paternity and sporophytic inbreeding depression in a dioicous moss species. Heredity. 2009;103:394–403. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2009.82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Thornber & Gaines (2004).Thornber CS, Gaines S. Population demographics in species with biphasic life cycles. Ecology and Evolution. 2004;85:1661–1674. [Google Scholar]
  • van der Strate et al. (2002).van der Strate HJ, van de Zande L, Stam WT, Olsen JL. The contribution of haploids, diploids and clones to fine-scale population structure in the seaweed Cladophoropsis membranacea (Chlorophyta) Molecular Ecology. 2002;11:329–345. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01448.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • van der Velde et al. (2001).van der Velde M, During HJ, van de Zande L, Bijlsma RK. The reproductive biology of Polytrichum formosum: clonal structure and paternity revealed by microsatellites. Molecular Ecology. 2001;10:2423–2434. doi: 10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01385.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Varlea-Álvarez et al. (2011).Varlea-Álvarez E, Glenn TC, Serrão EA, Duarte CM, Martínez-Daranas B, Valero M, Marbá N. Dinucleotide microsatellite markers in the genus Caulerpa. Journal of Applied Phycology. 2011;23:715–719. doi: 10.1007/s10811-010-9568-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Walsh, Metzger & Higuchi (1991).Walsh PS, Metzger DA, Higuchi R. Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. BioTechniques. 1991;10:506–513. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wattier et al. (1998).Wattier RA, Engel CR, Saumitou-Laprade P, Valero M. Short allele dominance as a source of heterozygote deficiency at microsatellite loci: experimental evidence at the dinucleotide locus Gv1CT in Gracilaria gracilis (Rhodophyta) Molecular Ecology. 1998;7:1569–1573. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00477.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Weinberger et al. (2008).Weinberger F, Buchholz B, Karez R, Wahl M. The invasive red alga Gracilaria vermiculophylla in the Baltic Sea: adaptation to brackish water may compensate for light limitation. Aquatic Biology. 2008;3:251–264. doi: 10.3354/ab00083. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Weir & Cockerham (1984).Weir BS, Cockerham CC. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution. 1984;38:1358–1370. doi: 10.2307/2408641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Williams & Smith (2007).Williams SL, Smith JE. A global review of the distribution, taxonomy, and impacts of introduced seaweeds. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 2007;38:327–359. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095543. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Wright et al. (2014).Wright JT, Byers JE, DeVore JL, Sotka EE. Engineering or food? Mechanisms of facilitation by a habitat-forming invasive seaweed. Ecology. 2014;95:2699–2706. doi: 10.1890/14-0127.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1. Reproductive phenology of (A) haploid female gametophytes, (B) haploid male gametophytes (50x) and (C) diploid tetrasporophytes (50x).

Gracilaria vermiculophylla exhibits a complex haploid–diploid life cycle, including two free-living stages of different ploidy levels: the haploid dioecious gametophytes and the diploid tetrasporophytes. Fertilization takes place on the female gametophyte, and the female gametes, once fertilized, develop into cystocarps, an additional, though not a free-living, stage. The cystocarp is a macroscopic swelling on the surface of the female thallus, within which the zygote is mitotically copied producing thousands of diploid spores, called carpospores. Spores released from the cystocarps germinate into the diploid tetrasporophytes. (Photo credit: SA Krueger-Hadfield).

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1159/supp-1
Table S1. Characteristics of 33 microsatellite loci developed for Gracilaria vermiculophylla that showed monomorphism, non-amplification, or multi-locus genetic determinism.

Acc. No., GenBank accession number; locus; motif; primer sequences; Profile: one- or multi-locus genetic determinism, no amp. indicates non-amplification; Ntall total number of alleles.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1159/supp-2
Table S2. Null allele frequencies for the microsatellite loci developed for Gracilaria vermiculophylla.

Frequencies were directly estimated in the haploid subpopulations, whereas frequencies in each of the diploid subpopulations at Akkeshi, Elkhorn Slough, Fort Johnson and Nordstrand were calculated using maximum likelihood and the software MLNullFreq (Kalinowski & Taper, 2006).

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1159/supp-3
Table S3. Short allele dominance analysis for microsatellite loci developed for Gracilaria vermiculophylla.

This includes number of pooled size classes used in regression analysis (following Wattier et al., 1998), No. of classes, and linear regression statistics. Loci Gverm_10367 and Gverm_2790 only exhibited two alleles in our sampled populations and consequently, short allele dominance analysis was not applicable (NA).

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1159/supp-4
Table S4. Linkage disequilibrium analysis for microsatellite loci developed for Gracilaria vermiculophylla.

Darkened cells indicate pairs of loci that show significant linkage disequilibrium after Bonferroni correction (p-value threshold < 0.006 at α = 0.05).

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1159/supp-5
Table S5. Genetic features per locus of four populations of Gracilaria vermiculophylla.

This includes: number of alleles at each locus, NA, + standard error (SE); mean allelic richness, AE, based on the smallest global sample size of 46 alleles (23 diploid individuals) + SE; mean observed heterozygosity, HO, + SE; mean expected heterozygosity, HE, + SE.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1159/supp-6
Supplemental Information 1. Development and characterization of microsatellite loci for the haploid–diploid red seaweed Gracilaria vermiculophylla.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1159/supp-7

Articles from PeerJ are provided here courtesy of PeerJ, Inc

RESOURCES