Abstract
Here, we show that new mitochondrial biogenesis is required for the anchorage independent survival and propagation of cancer stem-like cells (CSCs). More specifically, we used the drug XCT790 as an investigational tool, as it functions as a specific inhibitor of the ERRα-PGC1 signaling pathway, which governs mitochondrial biogenesis. Interestingly, our results directly demonstrate that XCT790 efficiently blocks both the survival and propagation of tumor initiating stem-like cells (TICs), using the MCF7 cell line as a model system. Mechanistically, we show that XCT790 suppresses the activity of several independent signaling pathways that are normally required for the survival of CSCs, such as Sonic hedgehog, TGFβ-SMAD, STAT3, and Wnt signaling. We also show that XCT790 markedly reduces oxidative mitochondrial metabolism (OXPHOS) and that XCT790-mediated inhibition of CSC propagation can be prevented or reversed by Acetyl-L-Carnitine (ALCAR), a mitochondrial fuel. Consistent with our findings, over-expression of ERRα significantly enhances the efficiency of mammosphere formation, which can be blocked by treatment with mitochondrial inhibitors. Similarly, mammosphere formation augmented by FOXM1, a downstream target of Wnt/β-catenin signaling, can also be blocked by treatment with three different classes of mitochondrial inhibitors (XCT790, oligomycin A, or doxycycline). In this context, our unbiased proteomics analysis reveals that FOXM1 drives the expression of >90 protein targets associated with mitochondrial biogenesis, glycolysis, the EMT and protein synthesis in MCF7 cells, processes which are characteristic of an anabolic CSC phenotype. Finally, doxycycline is an FDA-approved antibiotic, which is very well-tolerated in patients. As such, doxycycline could be re-purposed clinically as a ‘safe’ mitochondrial inhibitor, to target FOXM1 and mitochondrial biogenesis in CSCs, to prevent tumor recurrence and distant metastasis, thereby avoiding patient relapse.
Keywords: XCT790, doxycycline, drug repurposing, ERR-α, PGC1-α/β
INTRODUCTION
Tumor-initiating stem-like cells (TICs) are a small sub-population of tumor cells that are resistant to most anti-cancer therapies, including radio- and chemotherapy, and are able to expand and regenerate tumors, after conventional therapy is completed [1-4]. As such, TICs are responsible for tumor recurrence, metastatic dissemination, and, ultimately, patient death. As a consequence, TICs have become very attractive targets for novel cancer therapies. TICs share some features with stem cells, and many studies have investigated the signaling pathways regulating their proliferation, asymmetric cell division and migrating properties, as well as their ability to undergo proliferation under anchorage-independent conditions [5-7]. In fact, this latter property is being widely exploited to isolate TICs, which are able to survive and clonally expand as tumor-spheres, when placed in non-adherent settings [8]. Tumor-spheres generated from breast cancer cells are known as mammospheres.
The metabolic requirements of TICs remain a fairly unexplored area of investigation. We and others have recently shown that TICs rely mainly on mitochondrial metabolism, as compared to the more differentiated tumor cell population [9-12]. Also, it was previously shown that the radio-resistance of TICs from gliomas [13] and breast cancers [14] correlates with higher mitochondrial respiration.
We have demonstrated that >60 mitochondrial proteins are up-regulated in mammospheres derived from breast cancer cell lines (MCF7 and T47D), relative to cells grown in monolayers. Furthermore, pharmacological inhibition with oligomycin A, an inhibitor of the ATP synthase, greatly reduced mammosphere formation [11]. More importantly, treatment with doxycycline, an FDA-approved antibiotic targeting mitochondrial ribosomes as a known ‘side effect’, inhibited the formation of tumor-spheres generated from cell lines across several different tumor types, as well as from primary tumor samples [12].
These studies indicate that mitochondria in TICs are potentially druggable targets for the prevention of tumor recurrence and metastasis. The aim of our current study was to further validate mitochondrial function as a critical target for the development of new anti-cancer therapies. Here, we employed XCT790 as an investigational compound to inhibit mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation [15]. XCT790 is a well-established inverse agonist of Estrogen-Related Receptor α (ERRα), which functions as an essential cofactor of PGC1α. Importantly, PGC1α is required for the transcription of nuclear-encoded mitochondrial genes and drives mitochondrial biogenesis [16, 17]. XCT790 has been shown to inhibit colony formation in soft agar induced by PGC1α [18], and to induce cell death in chemo-resistant cancer cells [19]. However, to our knowledge, no studies have previously investigated the effects of XCT790 on the propagation and survival of TICs.
Here, our results show that XCT790 inhibits the proliferation of TICs from MCF7 breast cancer cells, as assessed using i) mammosphere formation and by ii) CD44/CD24 immuno-staining, coupled with FACS analysis. We also demonstrate that XCT790 suppresses the activation of well-established pathways governing TIC proliferation and survival, including Sonic hedgehog, TGFβ-SMAD, STAT3, and Wnt signaling. As expected, XCT790 profoundly reduced mitochondrial respiration. Importantly, XCT790-induced TIC inhibition could be rescued by treatment with Acetyl-L-Carnitine (ALCAR), a mitochondrial fuel and cofactor, which enhances mitochondrial oxidative metabolism and biogenesis [20]. We also show that overexpression of ERRα is sufficient to augment MCF7 cell mammosphere formation, which can be blocked by treatment with mitochondrial inhibitors, such as XCT790 and oligomycin A, an inhibitor of ATP synthase. Finally, we show that mammosphere formation driven by FOXM1, a transcription factor downstream of Wnt/β-catening signaling that governs stemness [21-24], can also be blocked by treatment with three different classes of mitochondrial inhibitors (XCT790, oligomycin A, or doxycycline).
Thus, our results firmly establish that mitochondrial biogenesis and metabolism are required for the survival of TICs, indicating that mitochondrial-targeted therapies are a promising novel strategy for targeting TICs for the treatment of relapsed and resistant cancers. Mitochondrial-targeted therapies should also be considered for cancer prevention.
RESULTS
Mammosphere formation in MCF7 cells depends on mitochondrial function
We have previously shown that mitochondrial proteins are up-regulated in mammospheres derived from breast cancer cell lines (MCF7 and T47D), relative to cells grown in monolayers [11]. Furthermore, pharmacological inhibition with oligomycin A, an inhibitor of ATP synthase, greatly reduced mammosphere formation [11]. More importantly, treatment with doxycycline, an FDA-approved antibiotic that targets mitochondrial ribosomes as a known ‘side effect’, inhibited the formation of tumor-spheres derived from 12 cell lines across eight different tumor types, as well as from primary tumor samples [12].
To further investigate the role of mitochondria in TICs, here we employed a well-established inverse agonist of ERRα, namely XCT790. ERRα is a cofactor of PGC1α/β, which is required for the transcription of nuclear mitochondrial genes and mitochondrial biogenesis [16, 17]. As such, XCT790 is believed to suppress mitochondrial function. Notably, treatment with XCT790 dose-dependently inhibits MCF7 mammosphere formation, with an IC-50 of 10 μM (Figure 1A). We also validated that XCT790 dose-dependently reduces the protein expression of PGC1α in MCF7 cell monolayers by immuno-blot analysis (data not shown), by up to 70-80%, over this concentration range.
These results were independently confirmed by evaluating the expression of bona-fide TIC markers CD44/CD24 by FACS. Under these conditions, CD44(+)high/CD24(−)low cells are considered to represent the TIC sub-population. XCT790 treatment significantly reduced the number of CD44(+)high/CD24(−)low cells in a dose-dependent fashion, relative to vehicle alone controls (Figure 1B).
We next set out to investigate if XCT790 can target TICs in the presence of the total cancer cell population. To this end, MCF7 cells were treated with XCT790 (at 5 or 10 μM) as monolayers for 2 days and then re-plated on low-attachment plates in the absence of XCT790, to generate mammospheres for 5 days. Under these conditions, XCT790 pre-treatment dose-dependently reduced MCF7 cell mammosphere formation, by up to ~70% (Figure 1C), indicating that XCT790 can target the TIC population also when present in a heterogeneous cell population.
Also, we asked if decreased mammosphere formation induced by XCT790 could be rescued by treatment with the mitochondrial cofactor Acetyl-L-Carnitine (ALCAR). ALCAR plays a key role in mitochondrial oxidative metabolism, by enhancing fatty acid β-oxidation [20]. ALCAR stimulates mitochondrial biogenesis and is also directly converted to acetyl-CoA, a mitochondrial fuel [20]. To this end, mammosphere formation was assessed after treatment with XCT790 (at 20 μM) and increasing concentrations of ALCAR. Figure 1D shows that ALCAR rescues the decrease in mammosphere formation induced by XCT790, in a dose-dependent manner. Thus, mitochondrial function is required for the efficient clonal expansion and anchorage-independent growth of TICs.
We then examined if XCT790 affects the viability of the total cancer cell population, or if it specifically inhibits the viability of MCF7 cells in mammospheres. To this end, MCF7 cells were treated with increasing concentrations of XCT790 as monolayers for 3 days (Figure 2A) or 5 days (Figure 2B). Cell viability was then assessed using the SRB assay. Note that 5-day treatment did not affect the viability of the MCF7 cell monolayers, as profoundly as MCF7 cell mammospheres (Figure 2B). For example, treatment with 10 μM XCT790 reduces mammosphere formation by 50% (Figure 1A), whereas the viability of monolayer cells is reduced by only 20%. Thus, XCT790 preferentially reduces the viability of MCF7 cell mammospheres, relative to bulk cancer cells.
XCT790 inhibits the activation of several stem cell related signaling pathways
To further corroborate the idea that XCT790 inhibits cancer stem cell-like features, we next analyzed the effects of XCT790 on a series of well-established signaling pathways, which have been shown to promote stemness. For this purpose, we employed a panel of eight MCF7 cell lines carrying different luciferase reporters [25], to monitor the activation state of a variety of different signaling networks, including Sonic hedgehog, TGFβ-SMAD, STAT3, Wnt, Interferon (IFN)-α/β-STAT1/2, NRF2-dependent antioxidant responses, IFN-γ-STAT1 and Notch pathways. Notably, several pathways were significantly inhibited by XCT790 treatment, including stem cell signaling (Sonic hedgehog, TGFβ-SMAD, STAT3, Wnt) and IFN-α/β-STAT1/2 signaling (Figure 3A). However, no effects were observed on the NRF2-antioxidant response, IFN-γ-STAT1 and the Notch pathways (Figure 3B). Thus, XCT790 inhibits the activation of several signal transduction pathways related to cancer stem-like features.
XCT790 inhibits mitochondrial respiration
Next, we set out to investigate the mechanism(s) by which XCT790 inhibits mammosphere formation and CSC features. XCT790 is an inverse agonist of ERRα, which is a cofactor of PGC1α required for the transcription of mitochondrial genes and mitochondrial biogenesis. Thus, the metabolic profile of MCF7 cells treated with XCT790 was analyzed. To this end, MCF7 cells were treated with XCT790 for 48 hours, stained with various MitoTracker probes and analyzed by FACS. Figure 4A shows that XCT790 induces a decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential, as assessed with MitoTracker Orange, which accumulates in mitochondria with an active mitochondrial potential. Surprisingly, XCT790 induces also an increase in mitochondrial mass, as assessed with MitoTracker Green (Figure 4B), localizing to mitochondria regardless of mitochondrial membrane potential. Similar results were obtained with MitoTracker Deep Red, which also measures mitochondria mass (data not shown). Analysis of the ratio of mitochondrial membrane potential versus mitochondrial mass indicates that XCT790 induces a profound decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential per mitochondria (Figure 4C).
Also, the metabolic profile of MCF7 cells treated with XCT790 was examined using the Seahorse XFe96 analyzer, by employing a mitochondrial stress test. Notably, the oxygen consumption rate (OCR) was greatly reduced by treatment with XCT790 (Figure 5A). Further quantification revealed significant reductions in basal and maximal respiration (Figure 5B-5C), as well as ATP levels (Figure 5D), upon XCT790 treatment. Thus, XCT790 significantly reduces the rates of oxidative mitochondrial metabolism. To further validate these results, a glycolytic stress test was performed using the Seahorse XFe96 analyzer, by measuring the extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) of MCF7 cells treated with XCT790. Notably, XCT790 also significantly reduces ECAR, a marker of glycolysis (Figure 6A). Finally, plotting the ratio of OCR to ECAR demonstrates that XCT790 shifts MCF7 cells from a highly energetic to a metabolically quiescent state (Figure 6B).
ERRα expression is both necessary and sufficient to increase mammosphere formation in MCF7 cells
XCT790 is an inverse agonist of ERRα. As XCT790 inhibits mammosphere formation, we then asked if ERRα expression is sufficient to promote 3D-spheroid formation in MCF7 cells. To this end, ERRα was over-expressed in MCF7 cells using a lentiviral approach. Empty Vector (EV) cells were generated in parallel. Figure 7A shows that MCF7 cells over-expressing ERRα show a 50% increase in mammosphere forming capacity. Notably, MCF7 cells over-expressing ERRα show increased mitochondrial membrane potential, as assessed by MitoTracker Orange, as well as increased mitochondrial mass, as assessed by MitoTracker Green and MitoTracker Deep Red, as expected (Figure 7B).
We then used a pharmacological approach to inhibit ERRα-driven mammosphere formation, using oligomycin A, a mitochondrial inhibitor, as well as XCT790, a specific ERRα inverse agonist. Importantly, mammosphere formation induced by ERRα expression was inhibited by either treatment with oligomycin A (Figure 7C), or XCT790 (Figure 7D). These results indicate that ERRα activity and mitochondrial function are normally required for the clonal expansion of TICs.
Mammosphere formation driven by FOXM1 requires mitochondrial function
To examine if mitochondrial function is essential for TIC expansion driven by well-established stem-like signaling, we decided to overexpress FOXM1 in MCF7 cells. Empty Vector (EV) control cells were generated in parallel. The transcription factor FOXM1 was recently shown to induce the expansion of human normal stem cells, as well as of cancer stem-like cells [21-24]. Mechanistically, it is believed that FOXM1 acts downstream of key signaling pathways essential for stem cell regulation and tumorigenesis, such as Wnt/β-catenin and 14-3-3ζ signaling cells [22, 26].
MCF7 cells over-expressing FOXM1 show a 3.3-fold increase in mammosphere formation, relative to empty-vector controls, as expected (Figure 8A). In order to better dissect the molecular changes driven by FOXM1, MCF7 cell monolayers over-expressing FOXM1 and EV control cells were subjected to proteomics analysis. Proteomic datasets of up-regulated proteins in the MCF7-FOXM1 cells were then analyzed with respect to their metabolic protein profiles.
Table 1 shows that several key molecules related to mitochondria, glycolysis and the EMT are up-regulated in FOXM1-over-expressing MCF7 cells, indicating that FOXM1-induced stemness is associated with increased metabolic flexibility. Notably, keratin-19 (KRT19), a well-established marker of circulating tumor cells and CSCs, is increased by >20-fold in MCF7-FOXM1 cells. Also, four key mitochondrial proteins (HSPD1, ACADVL, ATP5B, COX4I1) are increased by >10-fold each in MCF7-FOXM1 cells; SLC25A4 (the mitochondrial ATP/ADP exchanger) is increased by nearly 6-fold. Similarly, twenty-two other mitochondrial proteins are increased by >1.5 fold.
Table 1. MCF7-FOXM1 Cells Over-express Key Protein Molecules Functionally Related to Mitochondria, Glycolysis and the EMT.
Symbol | Description | Fold-Upregulation | ANOVA |
---|---|---|---|
Mitochondrial-related proteins (27) | |||
HSPD1 | HSP60, 60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrial | 12.35 | 0.02 |
ACADVL | Acyl-Coenzyme A dehydrogenase, very long chain, mitochondrial | 12.14 | 0.001 |
ATP5B | ATP synthase subunit beta, mitochondrial | 10.74 | 0.0006 |
COX4I1 | Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 4 isoform 1, mitochondrial | 9.44 | 0.002 |
SLC25A4 | Solute carrier family 25 (ADP/ATP translocase), member 4, mitochondrial | 5.97 | 0.003 |
PRKDC | DNA-dependent protein kinase, catalytic (maintains mt-DNA copy number) | 2.43 | 0.0005 |
ABAT | 4-aminobutyrate aminotransferase, mitochondrial | 2.28 | 0.0002 |
PMPCA | Mitochondrial-processing peptidase alpha subunit | 2.21 | 0.03 |
CHCHD3 | MICOS complex subunit MIC19, mitochondrial | 2.04 | 0.03 |
NDUFS1 | Mitochondrial NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase 75 kDa subunit | 1.99 | 7.61E-05 |
HSPA9 | Heat shock 70kDa protein 9 (Mortalin), mitochondrial | 1.90 | 0.049 |
SUCLG2 | Succinate-CoA ligase, GDP-forming, beta subunit | 1.88 | 0.01 |
SLC25A3 | Solute carrier family 25 (mitochondrial phosphate carrier), member 3 | 1.84 | 0.037 |
MTHFD2 | methylene tetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase (NAD+dependent), mitochondrial | 1.83 | 0.046 |
MDH2 | Malate dehydrogenase 2, NAD (mitochondrial) | 1.79 | 0.03 |
COX5A | Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 5A, mitochondrial | 1.78 | 0.0045 |
TIMM9 | Translocase of inner mitochondrial membrane 9 | 1.78 | 0.04 |
IDH2 | Isocitrate dehydrogenase [NADP], mitochondrial | 1.70 | 0.01 |
PDHA1 | Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component subunit alpha, mitochondrial | 1.67 | 0.037 |
MRPL49 | 39S ribosomal protein L49, mitochondrial | 1.63 | 0.04 |
ATP5A1 | ATP synthase subunit alpha, mitochondrial | 1.60 | 0.03 |
HADH2 | Hydroxyacyl-Coenzyme A dehydrogenase, type II, mitochondrial (HSD17B10) | 1.55 | 0.04 |
HADHB | Trifunctional enzyme subunit beta, mitochondrial | 1.55 | 0.049 |
ALDH18A1 | Delta-1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthase, mitochondrial | 1.55 | 0.02 |
GLRX5 | Glutaredoxin-related protein 5, mitochondrial | 1.97 | 0.03 |
PMPCB | Mitochondrial-processing peptidase subunit beta | 1.69 | 0.03 |
MRPS22 | 28S ribosomal protein S22, mitochondrial | 1.51 | 0.049 |
Glycolysis and PPP (10) | |||
G6PD | Glucose-6-phosphate 1-dehydrogenase | 10.02 | 0.0003 |
GAPDH | Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase | 8.35 | 0.003 |
ENO2 | Gamma-enolase | 7.72 | 6.65E-05 |
PKM1/2 | Pyruvate kinase, muscle | 5.49 | 0.0002 |
ALDOA | Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase | 5.44 | 6.37E-05 |
ENO1 | Alpha-enolase | 2.81 | 0.02 |
PGD | 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase, decarboxylating | 1.86 | 0.005 |
TKT | Transketolase | 1.81 | 0.004 |
TPI1 | Triosephosphate isomerase 1 | 1.74 | 0.04 |
PGAM1 | Phosphoglycerate mutase 1 (Brain) | 1.62 | 0.0001 |
EMT markers and Cytoskeletal proteins (31) | |||
KRT19 | Keratin, type I cytoskeletal 19 | 23.94 | 7.17E-06 |
PFN1 | Profilin 1 | 10.85 | 0.046 |
ACTB | Actin, cytoplasmic 1 | 8.11 | 0.0002 |
ACTC1 | Actin, alpha cardiac muscle 1 | 6.37 | 9.67E-05 |
ESPNL | Espin-like protein | 5.74 | 2.35E-05 |
ACTBL2 | Beta-actin-like protein 2 | 4.87 | 4.54E-06 |
TUBB2A | Tubulin beta-2A chain | 4.70 | 0.0005 |
MYL6 | Myosin light polypeptide 6 | 4.70 | 0.006 |
TUBB7 | Tubulin beta-7 chain | 4.40 | 0.003 |
EPPK1 | Epiplakin | 4.32 | 0.05 |
AGR2 | Anterior gradient protein 2 | 3.84 | 0.0007 |
PAK2 | Serine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 2 | 3.47 | 4.69E-05 |
PLEC | Plectin | 3.12 | 0.001 |
CROCC | Rootletin | 2.44 | 0.007 |
SPTBN1 | Spectrin beta chain, non-erythrocytic 1 | 2.38 | 0.01 |
TPM2 | Tropomyosin beta | 2.35 | 0.002 |
TLN2 | Talin-2 | 2.29 | 0.02 |
FLNB | Filamin-B | 2.11 | 0.03 |
TUBB4 | Tubulin beta-4 chain | 2.05 | 0.03 |
DYNC1I2 | Cytoplasmic dynein 1 intermediate chain 2 | 2.04 | 0.03 |
TMOD3 | Tropomodulin-3 | 2.01 | 2.01E-05 |
FLNC | Filamin-C | 1.93 | 0.008 |
ARPC2 | Actin related protein 2/3 complex, subunit 2, 34kDa, isoform | 1.84 | 0.047 |
APC | Adenomatosis polyposis coli | 1.82 | 0.05 |
DSP | Desmoplakin | 1.81 | 0.009 |
MYH14 | Myosin-14 | 1.80 | 0.0006 |
TLN1 | Talin-1 | 1.68 | 0.04 |
MYO1B | Myosin 1B | 1.65 | 0.04 |
MSN | Moesin | 1.59 | 0.02 |
TUBA1C | Tubulin alpha-1C | 1.54 | 0.04 |
DYNLL2 | Dynein light chain 2, cytoplasmic | 1.52 | 0.048 |
Moreover, Table 2 shows that several key molecules related to protein synthesis are also up-regulated in FOXM1-overexpressing MCF7 cells. We have previously shown that protein synthesis is a mechanism for enhancing the proliferation of TICs, and that known inhibitors of protein synthesis, such as puromycin and rapamycin, are very effective at reducing mammosphere formation [27]. Similarly, the EMT is also regarded as a key feature of TICs [28, 29]. Consistent with the notion that FOXM1 drives stemness, ribosome-related proteins and EMT markers are increased by FOXM1 expression (Tables 1 and 2).
Table 2. MCF7-FOXM1 Cells Over-express Key Protein Molecules Functionally Related to Ribosomes and Protein Synthesis.
Symbol | Description | Fold-Upregulation | ANOVA |
---|---|---|---|
Ribosome-related proteins (9) | |||
RPL15 | 60S ribosomal protein L15 | 5.49 | 0.003 |
RPL8 | 60S ribosomal protein L8 | 4.41 | 0.01 |
RPS3A | 40S ribosomal protein S3A | 1.78 | 0.046 |
RPL7 | 60S ribosomal protein L7 | 1.71 | 0.02 |
RPL10A | 60S ribosomal protein L10A | 1.69 | 0.006 |
RPL7A | 60S ribosomal protein L7A | 1.68 | 0.02 |
RRP1B | Ribosomal RNA processing protein 1 homolog B | 1.66 | 0.05 |
MRPL49 | 39S ribosomal protein L49, mitochondrial | 1.63 | 0.04 |
MRPS22 | 28S ribosomal protein S22, mitochondrial | 1.51 | 0.049 |
Translation initiation factors (4) | |||
EIF4G3 | Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 3 | 5.72 | 3.19E-06 |
EIF3C | Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit C | 2.44 | 0.001 |
EIF4B | Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4B | 1.83 | 0.04 |
EIF3S4 | Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit G | 1.55 | 0.04 |
Elongation factors (5) | |||
EEF1A1 | Elongation factor 1-alpha 1 | 5.63 | 0.0004 |
EEF1A2 | Elongation factor 1-alpha 2 | 4.36 | 0.05 |
EEF1G | Elongation factor 1-gamma | 3.03 | 0.003 |
EFTUD2 | Elongation factor Tu GTP binding domain containing 2 | 2.84 | 4.94E-05 |
EEF1D | Elongation factor 1-delta | 2.16 | 0.003 |
Enzymes for tRNA synthesis (6) | |||
GARS | Glycine--tRNA ligase | 4.50 | 0.0006 |
DARS | Aspartate--tRNA ligase, cytoplasmic | 2.28 | 0.01 |
TARS | Threonyl-tRNA synthetase, cytoplasmic | 1.82 | 0.01 |
HARS | Histidine--tRNA ligase, cytoplasmic | 1.82 | 0.03 |
RARS | Arginine--tRNA ligase, cytoplasmic | 1.70 | 0.01 |
AARS | Alanine--tRNA ligase, cytoplasmic | 1.56 | 0.03 |
Protein folding chaperones (heat shock proteins) (8) | |||
HSPD1 | Heat shock 60kDa protein 1 (Chaperonin), mitochondrial | 12.35 | 0.02 |
HSPB1 | Heat shock protein beta-1 | 3.00 | 0.009 |
HSPA8 | Heat shock cognate 71 kDa protein | 2.20 | 0.002 |
HSP90AB1 | Heat shock protein HSP 90-beta | 1.97 | 9.13E-07 |
CLGN | Calmegin (ER chaperone) | 1.59 | 0.026 |
HSPA1A | Heat shock 70 kDa protein 1 | 1.57 | 0.002 |
HSPH1 | Heat shock 105kDa/110kDa protein 1 | 1.55 | 0.02 |
HSPA6 | Heat shock 70 kDa protein 6 | 1.55 | .006 |
To test if mitochondrial inhibitors could block FOXM1-driven mammosphere formation, we then used several independent pharmacological approaches. Interestingly, formation of FOXM1-driven mammospheres was inhibited by treatment with oligomycin A (Figure 8B), XCT790 (Figure 8C), and doxycycline (Figure 8D). Doxycycline is an FDA-approved antibiotic that we have recently shown to inhibit proliferation of TICs, by targeting their mitochondrial ribosomes [12]. Thus, mitochondrial protein translation and function are required for FOXM1-driven mammosphere formation.
Mitochondrial function is required for 3D-spheroid formation using H295R cells
Finally, we asked if mitochondrial function is required for 3D-spheroid formation of other cell lines, such as H295R adrenocortical carcinoma cells. Figure 9 shows that XCT790 dose-dependently inhibits 3D-spheroid formation of the H295R adrenocortical carcinoma cell line, with an IC-50 of 10 μM. These results indicate that mitochondrial function is required for the 3D-spheroid formation of cell lines other than MCF7 breast cancer cells.
Quantitatively similar results were obtained when XCT790 was tested on several other epithelial cancer cell lines, indicating that the ability of XCT790 to inhibit 3D-spherioid formation reflects a general property of CSCs (data not shown).
Relevance of FOXM1-related targets in human breast cancers
To assess the possible clinical relevance of our results, we also determined whether the proteomic targets that we identified in MCF7-FOXM1 cells were transcriptionally over-expressed in human breast cancer cells in vivo. Towards this end, we exploited a clinical data set of tumor samples from 28 breast cancer patients. These tumor samples were subjected to laser-capture micro-dissection, to separate epithelial cancer cells from adjacent tumor stroma [30].
Tables 3 and 4 present a summary of these findings. Overall, greater than fifty FOXM1 targets (related to mitochondria, glycolysis, the EMT, and protein synthesis) that we identified in MCF7-FOXM1 cells were also transcriptionally elevated in human breast cancer cells in vivo. As such, the new FOXM1 protein targets that we identified in MCF7-FOXM1 cells may be especially relevant for improving human breast cancer diagnosis and therapy.
Table 3. FOXM1 Targets are Transcriptionally Up-regulated in Human Breast Cancer: Mitochondria, Glycolysis and the EMT.
Symbol | Gene Description | Up-regulation (fold-change) | P-value |
---|---|---|---|
Mitochondrial-related proteins (23) | |||
ATP5B | ATP synthase subunit beta, mitochondrial | 5.04 | 2.75E-06 |
ATP5A1 | ATP synthase subunit alpha, mitochondrial | 5.01 | 3.09E-06 |
MRPL49 | 39S ribosomal protein L49, mitochondrial | 4.94 | 3.93E-06 |
MDH2 | Malate dehydrogenase 2, NAD (mitochondrial) | 4.18 | 5.32E-05 |
GLRX5 | Glutaredoxin-related protein 5, mitochondrial | 4.07 | 7.83E-05 |
PMPCB | Mitochondrial-processing peptidase subunit beta | 3.81 | 1.77E-04 |
SLC25A3 | Solute carrier family 25 (mitochondrial phosphate carrier), member 3 | 3.76 | 2.09E-04 |
HSPA9 | Heat shock 70kDa protein 9 (Mortalin), mitochondrial | 3.69 | 2.64E-04 |
COX5A | Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 5A, mitochondrial | 3.62 | 3.22E-04 |
TIMM9 | Translocase of inner mitochondrial membrane 9 | 3.58 | 3.69E-04 |
HSPD1 | HSP60, 60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrial | 3.42 | 5.93E-04 |
COX4I1 | Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 4 isoform 1, mitochondrial | 3.39 | 6.61E-04 |
MRPS22 | 28S ribosomal protein S22, mitochondrial | 3.27 | 9.31E-04 |
NDUFS1 | Mitochondrial NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase 75 kDa subunit | 3.20 | 1.15E-03 |
HADHB | Trifunctional enzyme subunit beta, mitochondrial | 3.06 | 1.73E-03 |
SUCLG2 | Succinate-CoA ligase, GDP-forming, beta subunit | 3.03 | 1.89E-03 |
CHCHD3 | MICOS complex subunit MIC19, mitochondrial | 2.74 | 4.14E-03 |
MTHFD2 | methylene tetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase (NAD+dependent), mitochondrial | 2.67 | 4.98E-03 |
IDH2 | Isocitrate dehydrogenase [NADP], mitochondrial | 2.46 | 8.55E-03 |
PRKDC | DNA-dependent protein kinase, catalytic (maintains mt-DNA copy number) | 2.14 | 1.85E-02 |
ABAT | 4-aminobutyrate aminotransferase, mitochondrial | 2.08 | 2.14E-02 |
PDHA1 | Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component subunit alpha, mitochondrial | 1.89 | 3.21E-02 |
Glycolysis and PPP (7) | |||
TPI1 | Triosephosphate isomerase 1 | 4.21 | 4.88E-05 |
ALDOA | Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase | 3.60 | 3.45E-04 |
PKM1/2 | Pyruvate kinase, muscle | 3.26 | 9.79E-04 |
GAPDH | Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase | 2.97 | 2.22E-03 |
PGAM1 | Phosphoglycerate mutase 1 (Brain) | 2.55 | 6.87E-03 |
TKT | Transketolase | 2.20 | 1.60E-02 |
ENO1 | Alpha-enolase | 1.96 | 2.75E-02 |
EMT markers and Cytoskeletal proteins (11) | |||
DSP | Desmoplakin | 5.27 | 1.24E-06 |
FLNB | Filamin-B | 4.81 | 6.21E-06 |
KRT19 | Keratin, type I cytoskeletal 19 | 4.39 | 2.66E-05 |
DYNC1I2 | Cytoplasmic dynein 1 intermediate chain 2 | 3.90 | 1.33E-04 |
MYL6 | Myosin light polypeptide 6 | 3.74 | 2.22E-04 |
TUBA1C | Tubulin alpha-1C | 3.30 | 8.64E-04 |
AGR2 | Anterior gradient protein 2 | 2.94 | 2.44E-03 |
PAK2 | Serine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 2 | 2.88 | 2.86E-03 |
TUBB2A | Tubulin beta-2A chain | 2.63 | 5.56E-03 |
PFN1 | Profilin 1 | 2.27 | 1.36E-02 |
ARPC2 | Actin related protein 2/3 complex, subunit 2, 34kDa, isoform | 2.04 | 2.33E-02 |
-Transcriptional profiling data derived from the analysis of N=28 breast cancer patients are shown, high-lighting the levels of fold-upregulation observed in the epithelial cancer cell compartment (relative to the tumor stroma), and corresponding p-values derived from the analysis of these clinical samples.
Table 4. FOXM1 Targets are Transcriptionally Up-regulated in Human Breast Cancer: Ribosomes and Protein Synthesis.
Symbol | Gene Description | Up-regulation (fold-change) | P-value |
---|---|---|---|
Ribosome-related proteins (9) | |||
RPL7A | 60S ribosomal protein L7A | 5.23 | 1.41E-06 |
RPL7 | 60S ribosomal protein L7 | 5.21 | 1.53E-06 |
RPL10A | 60S ribosomal protein L10A | 5.09 | 2.35E-06 |
MRPL49 | 39S ribosomal protein L49, mitochondrial | 4.94 | 3.93E-06 |
RPL15 | 60S ribosomal protein L15 | 4.60 | 1.28E-05 |
RPS3A | 40S ribosomal protein S3A | 4.59 | 1.35E-05 |
RPL8 | 60S ribosomal protein L8 | 3.86 | 1.51E-04 |
MRPS22 | 28S ribosomal protein S22, mitochondrial | 3.27 | 9.31E-04 |
RRP1B | Ribosomal RNA processing protein 1 homolog B | 2.21 | 1.58E-02 |
Translation initiation factors (2) | |||
EIF3C | Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit C | 4.48 | 1.94E-05 |
EIF4B | Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4B | 3.17 | 1.27E-03 |
Elongation factors (3) | |||
EEF1G | Elongation factor 1-gamma | 3.71 | 2.44E-04 |
EEF1A1 | Elongation factor 1-alpha 1 | 3.16 | 1.30E-03 |
EEF1D | Elongation factor 1-delta | 2.50 | 7.67E-03 |
Enzymes for tRNA synthesis (2) | |||
DARS | Aspartate--tRNA ligase, cytoplasmic | 3.43 | 5.87E-04 |
HARS | Histidine--tRNA ligase, cytoplasmic | 2.42 | 9.55E-03 |
Protein folding chaperones (heat shock proteins) (5) | |||
HSP90AB1 | Heat shock protein HSP 90-beta | 4.93 | 5.93E-06 |
HSPD1 | Heat shock 60kDa protein 1 (Chaperonin), mitochondrial | 3.42 | 5.93E-04 |
HSPB1 | Heat shock protein beta-1 | 3.27 | 9.51E-04 |
HSPH1 | Heat shock 105kDa/110kDa protein 1 | 3.18 | 1.22E-03 |
HSPA8 | Heat shock cognate 71 kDa protein | 2.54 | 7.06E-03 |
-Transcriptional profiling data derived from the analysis of N=28 breast cancer patients are shown, high-lighting the levels of fold-upregulation observed in the epithelial cancer cell compartment (relative to the tumor stroma), and corresponding p-values derived from the analysis of these clinical samples.
DISCUSSION
Here, we specifically tested the hypothesis that new mitochondrial biogenesis is required for the survival and propagation of stem-like cancer cells. For this purpose, we used an investigational inhibitor of the ERRα-PGC1α/β signaling pathway, namely XCT790, to interrogate the role of mitochondrial biogenesis and function in the anchorage-independent growth of CSCs. Importantly, treatment with XCT790 blocked mammosphere formation and prevented anoikis-resistance in CD44(+)high/CD24(−)low MCF7 cells. Mechanistically, XCT790 inhibited mitochondrial function (OCR) and effectively reduced signaling along a number of classical stem cell transduction pathways, such as the Hedgehog/GLI, TGFβ/SMAD, and Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Overexpression of either ERRα or FOXM1 (a down-stream target of Wnt-signaling [22]) in MCF7 cells significantly augmented mammosphere formation, which could be prevented by a number of mitochondrial inhibitors. In this regard, doxycycline treatment was sufficient to overcome the effects of FOXM1 on mammosphere formation. Interestingly, doxycycline is an FDA-approved antibiotic that has been used for nearly 50 years to treat a wide variety of bacterial and parasitic infections, without significant side effects. Finally, unbiased proteomics analysis of MCF7-FOXM1 cells revealed the up-regulation of specific mitochondrial proteins, glycolytic enzymes, EMT markers and components of the protein synthesis machinery. Importantly, these FOXM1 target proteins were also transcriptionally up-regulated in patient samples in vivo, in human breast cancer epithelial cells isolated by laser-capture micro-dissection, highlighting their clinical relevance.
Many other recent studies have also directly implicated augmented mitochondrial function in resistance to chemotherapy and radiation [31-36], in the survival of treatment-resistant cancer stem-like cells [37], in the propagation and motility of circulating tumor cells [38], as well as in tumor growth and cancer cell metastasis in pre-clinical animal models in vivo [39-44].
Consistent with our current findings, we have previously shown that a PGC1/NRF1 gene signature predicts tumor recurrence, metastasis and poor overall survival in ER(+)/Luminal-A breast cancer patients [45]. This PGC1/NRF1 gene signature was also elevated in >2,000 human tumors excised from breast cancer patients, including both ER(+) and ER(−) cases [45]. Moreover, recombinant over-expression of PGC1α/β, or other genes that promote mitochondrial biogenesis (MitoNEET/POLRMT), in MDA-MB-231 cells, was indeed sufficient to functionally increase tumor growth by up to ~3-fold [43].
Asymmetric cell division is an essential characteristic of stem cells. Interestingly, Sabatini, Weinberg and colleagues examined the segregation of “newly-synthesized” and “older” mitochondria in immortalized mammary epithelial cells, during asymmetric cell division, a property that is also a characteristic of CSCs [46]. They observed that “newly-synthesized” mitochondria were preferentially enriched in stem cells during asymmetric cell division, while “old” mitochondria were segregated into the daughter cells [46]. These results imply that asymmetric cell division in stem cells somehow requires new mitochondrial biogenesis, for the propagation and maintenance of the stem cell phenotype.
As such, these findings may help to mechanistically explain our current results that new mitochondrial biogenesis is required for the efficient propagation of and survival of CSCs (Figure 10), as we have seen using the mammosphere and anoikis-resistance assays, to measure stem cell activity. Taken together, these data implicate mitochondrial biogenesis and mitochondrial function as critical targets for new drug discovery, to overcome tumor recurrence, distant metastasis and drug-resistance, especially in cancer patients with clinically advanced disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials
MCF7 breast cancer cells were purchased from the ATCC. H295R adrenocortical carcinoma cells were a generous gift of Dr. Antonio Stigliano (University of Rome). Gibco-brand cell culture media (DMEM/F12) was purchased from Life Technologies. XCT790 was purchased from Tocris, oligomycin A and doxycycline were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Lentiviral vectors for the expression of ERRα (#Z1441) and FOXM1 (#U1376) were obtained commercially from Genecopoeia, along with the appropriate empty vector controls, in the Lv-105 (PuroR) vector system.
Mammosphere culture
A single cell suspension was prepared using enzymatic (1x Trypsin-EDTA, Sigma Aldrich, #T3924), and manual disaggregation (25 gauge needle) to create a single cell suspension [8]. Cells were plated at a density of 500 cells/cm2 in mammosphere medium (DMEM-F12/B27/EGF(20ng/ml)/Pen-Strep) in non-adherent conditions, in culture dishes coated with (2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate) (poly-HEMA, Sigma, #P3932). Cells were grown for 5 days and maintained in a humidified incubator at 37°C at an atmospheric pressure in 5% (v/v) carbon dioxide/air. After 5 days for culture, spheres >50 μm were counted using an eye piece graticule, and the percentage of cells plated which formed spheres was calculated and is referred to as percentage mammosphere formation, and was normalized to one (1 = 100 %MSE, mammosphere forming efficiency). For pharmacological inhibition of mammosphere formation, cells were directly seeded on low-attachment plates in the presence of XCT790 or oligomycin or doxycycline at the indicated concentrations.
Pre-treatment of monolayers with XCT790
After incubation with XCT790 (5 or 10 μM for 48 hours), MCF7 cell monolayers were trypsinized and seeded for mammosphere cultures for 5 days, without XCT790.
Lentiviruses
Lentiviral plasmids, packaging cells and reagents were from Genecopoeia. 48 hours after seeding, 293Ta packaging cells were transfected with lentiviral vectors encoding ERRα, FOXM1 or empty vector (EX-NEG-Lv105), using Lenti-PacTM HIV Expression Packaging Kit according to the manufacturer's instructions. Two days post-transfection, lentivirus-containing culture medium was passed through a 0.45 μm filter and added to the target cells (MCF7 cells) in the presence of 5μg/ml Polybrene. Infected cells were selected with a concentration of 1.5 μg/ml of puromycin.
CD44/CD24 analysis
Following XCT790 treatment for 48 hours, the TIC population was enriched by seeding on low-attachment plates. Under these conditions, the non-TIC population undergoes anoikis (a form of apoptosis induced by a lack of cell-substrate attachment) and TICs are believed to survive. The surviving TIC fraction was analyzed by FACS analysis. Briefly, 1 × 104 MCF7 monolayer cells were treated with XCT790 (5μM and 10 μM) for 48h in 6-well plates. Then, cells were trypsinized and seeded in low-attachment plates in mammosphere media. After 10h, MCF7 cells were spun down and incubated with CD24 (IOTest CD24-PE, Beckman Coulter) and CD44 (APC mouse Anti-Human CD44, BD Pharmingen cat.559942) antibodies for 15 minutes on ice. Cells were rinsed twice and incubated with LIVE/DEAD dye (Fixable Dead Violet reactive dye; Invitrogen) for 10 minutes. Samples were then analyzed by FACS (Fortessa, BD Bioscence). Only the live population, as identified by the LIVE/DEAD dye staining, was analyzed for CD24/CD44 expression. Data were analyzed using FlowJo software.
Viability assay
Cell viability was assessed by sulphorhodamine (SRB) assay, based on the measurement of cellular protein content. After treatment with XCT790 for 3 or 5 days in 96 well plates, cells were fixed with 10% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) for 1h in cold room, and dried overnight at room temperature. Then, cells were incubated with SRB for 15 min, washed twice with 1% acetic acid, and air dried for at least 1h. Finally, the protein-bound dye was dissolved in 10 mM Tris pH 8.8 solution and read using the plate reader at 540 nm.
Evaluation of CSC signalling pathways
The Cignal Lenti reporter assay (luc) system (Qiagen) was chosen for monitoring the activity of several signaling pathways in MCF7 cells [25]. The responsive luciferase constructs encode the firefly luciferase reporter gene under the control of a minimal (m)CMV promoter and tandem repeats of response elements for each pathway. The following constructs were used: TCF/LEF(luc) for Wnt signaling (CLS-018L); STAT3(luc) for transcriptional activity of STAT3 (CLS-6028L); RBP-Jk(luc) for Notch-induced signaling (CLS-014L); ARE(luc) for Nrf2- and Nrf1-mediated antioxidant response (CLS-2020L); GAS(luc) for IFNγ-induced Stat1-signaling (CLS-009L); ISRE(luc) for (IFN)-α/β-STAT1/2 signaling (CLS-008L); SMAD(luc) for TGFβ-induced signaling (CLS-017L); GLI(luc) for Sonic hedgehog signaling (CCS-6030L). Briefly, 1 × 105 MCF7 cells were seeded in 12-well plates. Once cells were attached, the viral particles were diluted 1:10 in complete culture media containing polybrene (sc-134220, Santa Cruz), and added to the cells. Puromycin treatment (#P9620, Sigma) was started 48 hours later in order to select stably infected cells.
Luciferase assay
Luciferase Assay System (E1501, Promega) was performed in all luciferase reporter MCF7 cells treated with XCT790. Briefly, 6 × 103 MCF7 cells were seeded in black-walled 96-well plates and then were treated with XCT790 (10 μg/ml). As control, vehicle-treated cells were run in parallel. Four replicates were used for each condition. After 48 hours of treatment, luciferase assay was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Light signal was acquired for 2 minutes in photons/second in the Xenogen VivoVision IVIS Lumina (Caliper Life Sciences), and the results were analysed using the Living Image 3.2 sofware (Caliper Life Sciences). Luminescence was normalized using total proteins, as assessed with the Bradford protein assay.
Mitochondrial staining
To measure mitochondrial activity, cells were stained with MitoTracker Orange (#M7510, Invitrogen), whose accumulation in mitochondria is dependent upon membrane potential. To measure mitochondrial mass, cells were stained with MitoTracker Green (#M7514 Invitrogen), or MitoTracker Deep Red (#M22426, Invitrogen), both localizing to mitochondria regardless of mitochondrial membrane potential. Briefly, MCF7 cells were treated with XCT790 for 48 hours. Cells were then incubated with pre-warmed MitoTracker staining solution (diluted in PBS/CM to a final concentration of 10 nM) for 30-60 min at 37 °C. All subsequent steps were performed in the dark. Cells were washed in PBS, harvested, and re-suspended in 300 μL of PBS. Cells were then analyzed by flow cytometry. Data analysis was performed using FlowJo software.
Seahorse XFe96 metabolic flux analysis
Extracellular acidification rates (ECAR) and real-time oxygen consumption rates (OCR) for MCF7 cells treated with XCT790 or vehicle alone control were determined using the Seahorse Extracellular Flux (XF96) analyzer (Seahorse Bioscience, MA, USA). MCF7 cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS (fetal bovine serum), 2 mM GlutaMAX, and 1% Pen-Strep. 7,000 cells were seeded per well into XF96-well cell culture plates, and incubated overnight at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere. After 24h, cells were treated with XCT790 (5μM or 10 μM) for 48h. After 48h of treatment, cells were washed in pre-warmed XF assay media (for OCR measurement, XF assay media was supplemented with 10mM glucose, 1mM Pyruvate, 2mM L-glutamine and adjusted at pH 7.4). Cells were then maintained in 175 μL/well of XF assay media at 37°C, in a non-CO2 incubator for 1h. During the cell incubation time, we loaded 25 μL each of 80mM glucose, 9μM oligomycin, 1M 2-deoxyglucose (for ECAR measurement) and 25 μL each of 10μM oligomycin, 9μM FCCP, 10μM rotenone, 10μM antimycin A (for OCR measurement), in XF assay media into the injection ports in the XFe-96 sensor cartridge. ECAR and OCR measurements were normalized by protein content. Data set was analyzed by XFe-96 software and GraphPad Prism software, using one-way ANOVA and Student's t-test calculations. All experiments were performed in quintuplicate, three times independently, such that each data point represents the average of 15 replicates.
Label-free quantitative proteomics analysis
Cell lysates were prepared for trypsin digestion by sequential reduction of disulphide bonds with TCEP and alkylation with MMTS [47]. Then, the peptides were extracted and prepared for LC-MS/MS. All LC-MS/MS analyses were performed on an LTQ Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA) coupled to an Ultimate 3000 RSLCnano system (Thermo Scientific, formerly Dionex, The Netherlands). Xcalibur raw data files acquired on the LTQ-Orbitrap XL were directly imported into Progenesis LCMS software (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, formerly Non-linear dynamics, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK) for peak detection and alignment. Data were analyzed using the Mascot search engine. Five replicates were analyzed for each sample type (N = 5). Statistical analyses were performed using ANOVA and only fold-changes in proteins with a p-value less than 0.05 were considered significant.
Data mining
To firmly establish the clinical relevance of our results from the quantitative proteomics analysis of mammosheres, we re-analyzed the transcriptional profiles of epithelial breast cancer cells and adjacent tumor stromal cells that were physically separated by laser-capture microdissection (from N = 28 human breast cancer patients) [30].
Acknowledgments
We thank the University of Manchester for providing start-up funds that contributed to the success of this study. FS and MPL were supported, in part, by funding from the European Union (ERC Advanced Grant), Breakthrough Breast Cancer, and the Manchester Cancer Research Centre (MCRC). DLS was core-funded by CRUK. ADL was supported by an E.U. grant for post-doctoral associates: Unical (POR Calabria FSE 2007-2013. VP was funded by a grant from the Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC), project n. IG14433.
Abbreviations
- CSCs
cancer stem-like cells
- TICs
tumor-initiating stem-like cells
Footnotes
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
There is no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Sinha N, Mukhopadhyay S, Das DN, Panda PK, Bhutia SK. Relevance of cancer initiating/stem cells in carcinogenesis and therapy resistance in oral cancer. Oral oncology. 2013;49:854–862. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2013.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Scopelliti A, Cammareri P, Catalano V, Saladino V, Todaro M, Stassi G. Therapeutic implications of Cancer Initiating Cells. Expert opinion on biological therapy. 2009;9:1005–1016. doi: 10.1517/14712590903066687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Xin H, Kong Y, Jiang X, Wang K, Qin X, Miao ZH, Zhu Y, Tan W. Multi-drug-resistant cells enriched from chronic myeloid leukemia cells by Doxorubicin possess tumor-initiating-cell properties. Journal of pharmacological sciences. 2013;122:299–304. doi: 10.1254/jphs.13025fp. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Easwaran H, Tsai HC, Baylin SB. Cancer epigenetics: tumor heterogeneity, plasticity of stem-like states, and drug resistance. Molecular cell. 2014;54:716–727. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.05.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Takebe N, Miele L, Harris PJ, Jeong W, Bando H, Kahn M, Yang SX, Ivy SP. Targeting Notch, Hedgehog, and Wnt pathways in cancer stem cells: clinical update. Nature reviews Clinical oncology. 2015 doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Angeloni V, Tiberio P, Appierto V, Daidone MG. Implications of stemness-related signaling pathways in breast cancer response to therapy. Seminars in cancer biology. 2015;31:43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2014.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Maccalli C, De Maria R. Cancer stem cells: perspectives for therapeutic targeting. Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII. 2015;64:91–97. doi: 10.1007/s00262-014-1592-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Shaw FL, Harrison H, Spence K, Ablett MP, Simoes BM, Farnie G, Clarke RB. A detailed mammosphere assay protocol for the quantification of breast stem cell activity. Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia. 2012;17:111–117. doi: 10.1007/s10911-012-9255-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Alvero AB, Montagna MK, Holmberg JC, Craveiro V, Brown D, Mor G. Targeting the mitochondria activates two independent cell death pathways in ovarian cancer stem cells. Molecular cancer therapeutics. 2011;10:1385–1393. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-0023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pasto A, Bellio C, Pilotto G, Ciminale V, Silic-Benussi M, Guzzo G, Rasola A, Frasson C, Nardo G, Zulato E, Nicoletto MO, Manicone M, Indraccolo S, Amadori A. Cancer stem cells from epithelial ovarian cancer patients privilege oxidative phosphorylation, and resist glucose deprivation. Oncotarget. 2014;5:4305–4319. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lamb R, Harrison H, Hulit J, Smith DL, Lisanti MP, Sotgia F. Mitochondria as new therapeutic targets for eradicating cancer stem cells: Quantitative proteomics and functional validation via MCT1/2 inhibition. Oncotarget. 2014;5:11029–11037. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lamb R, Ozsvari B, Lisanti CL, Tanowitz HB, Howell A, Martinez-Outschoorn UE, Sotgia F, Lisanti MP. Antibiotics that target mitochondria effectively eradicate cancer stem cells, across multiple tumor types: Treating cancer like an infectious disease. Oncotarget. 6:4569–4584. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Vlashi E, Lagadec C, Vergnes L, Matsutani T, Masui K, Poulou M, Popescu R, Della Donna L, Evers P, Dekmezian C, Reue K, Christofk H, Mischel PS, Pajonk F. Metabolic state of glioma stem cells and nontumorigenic cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011;108:16062–16067. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1106704108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Vlashi E, Lagadec C, Vergnes L, Reue K, Frohnen P, Chan M, Alhiyari Y, Dratver MB, Pajonk F. Metabolic differences in breast cancer stem cells and differentiated progeny. Breast cancer research and treatment. 2014;146:525–534. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-3051-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Busch BB, Stevens WC, Jr, Martin R, Ordentlich P, Zhou S, Sapp DW, Horlick RA, Mohan R. Identification of a selective inverse agonist for the orphan nuclear receptor estrogen-related receptor alpha. Journal of medicinal chemistry. 2004;47:5593–5596. doi: 10.1021/jm049334f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Deblois G, Giguere V. Functional and physiological genomics of estrogen-related receptors (ERRs) in health and disease. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2011;1812:1032–1040. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2010.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Deblois G, St-Pierre J, Giguere V. The PGC-1/ERR signaling axis in cancer. Oncogene. 2013;32:3483–3490. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fisher KW, Das B, Kortum RL, Chaika OV, Lewis RE. Kinase suppressor of ras 1 (KSR1) regulates PGC1alpha and estrogen-related receptor alpha to promote oncogenic Ras-dependent anchorage-independent growth. Molecular and cellular biology. 2011;31:2453–2461. doi: 10.1128/MCB.05255-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wu F, Wang J, Wang Y, Kwok TT, Kong SK, Wong C. Estrogen-related receptor alpha (ERRalpha) inverse agonist XCT-790 induces cell death in chemotherapeutic resistant cancer cells. Chemico-biological interactions. 2009;181:236–242. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2009.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cassano P, Sciancalepore AG, Pesce V, Fluck M, Hoppeler H, Calvani M, Mosconi L, Cantatore P, Gadaleta MN. Acetyl-L-carnitine feeding to unloaded rats triggers in soleus muscle the coordinated expression of genes involved in mitochondrial biogenesis. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2006;1757:1421–1428. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2006.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gemenetzidis E, Elena-Costea D, Parkinson EK, Waseem A, Wan H, Teh MT. Induction of human epithelial stem/progenitor expansion by FOXM1. Cancer research. 2010;70:9515–9526. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhang N, Wei P, Gong A, Chiu WT, Lee HT, Colman H, Huang H, Xue J, Liu M, Wang Y, Sawaya R, Xie K, Yung WK, Medema RH, He X, Huang S. FoxM1 promotes beta-catenin nuclear localization and controls Wnt target-gene expression and glioma tumorigenesis. Cancer cell. 2011;20:427–442. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.08.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bao B, Wang Z, Ali S, Kong D, Banerjee S, Ahmad A, Li Y, Azmi AS, Miele L, Sarkar FH. Over-expression of FoxM1 leads to epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cell phenotype in pancreatic cancer cells. Journal of cellular biochemistry. 2011;112:2296–2306. doi: 10.1002/jcb.23150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 24.Chiu WT, Huang YF, Tsai HY, Chen CC, Chang CH, Huang SC, Hsu KF, Chou CY. FOXM1 confers to epithelial-mesenchymal transition, stemness and chemoresistance in epithelial ovarian carcinoma cells. Oncotarget. 2015;6:2349–2365. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Peiris-Pages M, Sotgia F, Lisanti MP. Chemotherapy induces the cancer-associated fibroblast phenotype, activating paracrine hedgehog-GLI signaling in breast cancer cells. Oncotarget. 6:10728–10745. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bergamaschi A, Christensen BL, Katzenellenbogen BS. Reversal of endocrine resistance in breast cancer: interrelationships among 14-3-3zeta, FOXM1, and a gene signature associated with mitosis. Breast cancer research : BCR. 2011;13:R70. doi: 10.1186/bcr2913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lamb R, Harrison H, Smith DL, Townsend PA, Jackson T, Ozsvari B, Martinez-Outschoorn UE, Pestell RG, Howell A, Lisanti MP, Sotgia F. Targeting tumor-initiating cells: eliminating anabolic cancer stem cells with inhibitors of protein synthesis or by mimicking caloric restriction. Oncotarget. 2015;6:4585–4601. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Scheel C, Eaton EN, Li SH, Chaffer CL, Reinhardt F, Kah KJ, Bell G, Guo W, Rubin J, Richardson AL, Weinberg RA. Paracrine and autocrine signals induce and maintain mesenchymal and stem cell states in the breast. Cell. 2011;145:926–940. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.04.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mani SA, Guo W, Liao MJ, Eaton EN, Ayyanan A, Zhou AY, Brooks M, Reinhard F, Zhang CC, Shipitsin M, Campbell LL, Polyak K, Brisken C, Yang J, Weinberg RA. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition generates cells with properties of stem cells. Cell. 2008;133:704–715. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Casey T, Bond J, Tighe S, Hunter T, Lintault L, Patel O, Eneman J, Crocker A, White J, Tessitore J, Stanley M, Harlow S, Weaver D, Muss H, Plaut K. Molecular signatures suggest a major role for stromal cells in development of invasive breast cancer. Breast cancer research and treatment. 2009;114:47–62. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-9982-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bowling BD, Doudican N, Manga P, Orlow SJ. Inhibition of mitochondrial protein translation sensitizes melanoma cells to arsenic trioxide cytotoxicity via a reactive oxygen species dependent mechanism. Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology. 2008;63:37–43. doi: 10.1007/s00280-008-0705-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Martinez-Outschoorn UE, Goldberg A, Lin Z, Ko YH, Flomenberg N, Wang C, Pavlides S, Pestell RG, Howell A, Sotgia F, Lisanti MP. Anti-estrogen resistance in breast cancer is induced by the tumor microenvironment and can be overcome by inhibiting mitochondrial function in epithelial cancer cells. Cancer biology & therapy. 2011;12:924–938. doi: 10.4161/cbt.12.10.17780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Martinez-Outschoorn UE, Prisco M, Ertel A, Tsirigos A, Lin Z, Pavlides S, Wang C, Flomenberg N, Knudsen ES, Howell A, Pestell RG, Sotgia F, Lisanti MP. Ketones and lactate increase cancer cell “stemness,” driving recurrence, metastasis and poor clinical outcome in breast cancer: achieving personalized medicine via Metabolo-Genomics. Cell cycle. 2011;10:1271–1286. doi: 10.4161/cc.10.8.15330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lu CL, Qin L, Liu HC, Candas D, Fan M, Li JJ. Tumor cells switch to mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation under radiation via mTOR-mediated hexokinase II inhibition--a Warburg-reversing effect. PloS one. 2015;10:e0121046. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Whitaker-Menezes D, Martinez-Outschoorn UE, Flomenberg N, Birbe RC, Witkiewicz AK, Howell A, Pavlides S, Tsirigos A, Ertel A, Pestell RG, Broda P, Minetti C, Lisanti MP, Sotgia F. Hyperactivation of oxidative mitochondrial metabolism in epithelial cancer cells in situ: visualizing the therapeutic effects of metformin in tumor tissue. Cell cycle. 2011;10:4047–4064. doi: 10.4161/cc.10.23.18151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ko YH, Lin Z, Flomenberg N, Pestell RG, Howell A, Sotgia F, Lisanti MP, Martinez-Outschoorn UE. Glutamine fuels a vicious cycle of autophagy in the tumor stroma and oxidative mitochondrial metabolism in epithelial cancer cells: implications for preventing chemotherapy resistance. Cancer biology & therapy. 2011;12:1085–1097. doi: 10.4161/cbt.12.12.18671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Viale A, Pettazzoni P, Lyssiotis CA, Ying H, Sanchez N, Marchesini M, Carugo A, Green T, Seth S, Giuliani V, Kost-Alimova M, Muller F, Colla S, Nezi L, Genovese G, Deem AK, et al. Oncogene ablation-resistant pancreatic cancer cells depend on mitochondrial function. Nature. 2014;514:628–632. doi: 10.1038/nature13611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.LeBleu VS, O'Connell JT, Gonzalez Herrera KN, Wikman H, Pantel K, Haigis MC, de Carvalho FM, Damascena A, Domingos Chinen LT, Rocha RM, Asara JM, Kalluri R. PGC-1alpha mediates mitochondrial biogenesis and oxidative phosphorylation in cancer cells to promote metastasis. Nature cell biology. 2014;16:992–1003. 1001–1015. doi: 10.1038/ncb3039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bonuccelli G, Tsirigos A, Whitaker-Menezes D, Pavlides S, Pestell RG, Chiavarina B, Frank PG, Flomenberg N, Howell A, Martinez-Outschoorn UE, Sotgia F, Lisanti MP. Ketones and lactate “fuel” tumor growth and metastasis: Evidence that epithelial cancer cells use oxidative mitochondrial metabolism. Cell cycle. 2010;9:3506–3514. doi: 10.4161/cc.9.17.12731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Martinez-Outschoorn UE, Sotgia F, Lisanti MP. Power surge: supporting cells “fuel” cancer cell mitochondria. Cell metabolism. 2012;15:4–5. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Son J, Lyssiotis CA, Ying H, Wang X, Hua S, Ligorio M, Perera RM, Ferrone CR, Mullarky E, Shyh-Chang N, Kang Y, Fleming JB, Bardeesy N, Asara JM, Haigis MC, DePinho RA, et al. Glutamine supports pancreatic cancer growth through a KRAS-regulated metabolic pathway. Nature. 2013;496:101–105. doi: 10.1038/nature12040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Tan AS, Baty JW, Dong LF, Bezawork-Geleta A, Endaya B, Goodwin J, Bajzikova M, Kovarova J, Peterka M, Yan B, Pesdar EA, Sobol M, Filimonenko A, Stuart S, Vondrusova M, Kluckova K, et al. Mitochondrial genome acquisition restores respiratory function and tumorigenic potential of cancer cells without mitochondrial DNA. Cell metabolism. 2015;21:81–94. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Salem AF, Whitaker-Menezes D, Howell A, Sotgia F, Lisanti MP. Mitochondrial biogenesis in epithelial cancer cells promotes breast cancer tumor growth and confers autophagy resistance. Cell cycle. 2012;11:4174–4180. doi: 10.4161/cc.22376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Martinez-Outschoorn UE, Sotgia F, Lisanti MP. Caveolae and signalling in cancer. Nature reviews Cancer. 2015;15:225–237. doi: 10.1038/nrc3915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ertel A, Tsirigos A, Whitaker-Menezes D, Birbe RC, Pavlides S, Martinez-Outschoorn UE, Pestell RG, Howell A, Sotgia F, Lisanti MP. Is cancer a metabolic rebellion against host aging? In the quest for immortality, tumor cells try to save themselves by boosting mitochondrial metabolism. Cell Cycle. 2012;11:253–63. doi: 10.4161/cc.11.2.19006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Katajisto P, Dohla J, Chaffer CL, Pentinmikko N, Marjanovic N, Iqbal S, Zoncu R, Chen W, Weinberg RA, Sabatini DM. Stem cells. Asymmetric apportioning of aged mitochondria between daughter cells is required for stemness. Science. 2015;348:340–343. doi: 10.1126/science.1260384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Holland M, Castro FV, Alexander S, Smith D, Liu J, Walker M, Bitton D, Mulryan K, Ashton G, Blaylock M, Bagley S, Connolly Y, Bridgeman J, Miller C, Krishnan S, Dempsey C, et al. RAC2, AEP, and ICAM1 expression are associated with CNS disease in a mouse model of pre-B childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2011;118:638–649. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-09-307330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]