Abstract
Tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) is an essential cofactor of nitric oxide synthase (NOS), and reduced BH4 availability leads to endothelial NOS (eNOS) uncoupling and increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation. Questions remain regarding the functional state of eNOS and role of BH4 availability in the process of in vivo myocardial ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury. Rats were subjected to 60-minutes of in vivo left coronary artery occlusion and varying periods of reperfusion with or without pre-ischemic liposomal BH4 supplementation (1 mg/kg, iv). Myocardial infarction was correlated with cardiac BH4 content, eNOS protein level, NOS enzyme activity, and ROS generation. In the vehicle group, 60-min ischemia drastically reduced myocardial BH4 content in the area at risk (AAR) compared to non-ischemic (NI) area and the level remained lower during early reperfusion followed by recovery after 24-hr reperfusion. Activated eNOS protein level (eNOS Ser1177 phosphorylation) and NOS activity were also significantly reduced during ischemia and/or early reperfusion, but recovered after 24-hr reperfusion. With liposomal BH4 treatment, BH4 levels were identical in the AAR and NI area during ischemia and/or early reperfusion, and were significantly higher than with vehicle. BH4 pre-treatment preserved eNOS Ser1177 phosphorylation and NOS activity in the AAR, and significantly reduced myocardial ROS generation and infarction compared to vehicle. These findings provide direct evidence that in vivo I/R induces eNOS dysfunction secondary to BH4 depletion, and that pre-ischemic liposomal BH4 administration preserves eNOS function conferring cardioprotection with reduced oxidative stress.
Keywords: tetrahydrobiopterin, ischemia/reperfusion, myocardial BH4 content, NOS activity, oxidative stress, myocardial protection
1. Introduction
Nitric oxide (NO) is an important signaling molecule with critical functions in the cardiovascular system including regulation of blood pressure, blood flow, regional vascular tone, and cardiac function [1, 2]. NO is generated by specific NO synthases (NOSs) that metabolize L-arginine to L-citrulline with the formation of NO [2, 3]. BH4 is an essential cofactor for the activity of NOS and subsequent NO generation [4, 5], and is also a potent scavenger of oxygen-derived free radicals [6–8]. There is a close correlation between NO synthesis and the intracellular concentrations of BH4 [9], with in vivo endothelial NOS (eNOS) coupling regulated by eNOS:BH4 stoichiometry [10]. Importantly, BH4 is highly redox-sensitive and readily oxidized; therefore, with oxidative stress, intracellular BH4 can fall below critical levels leading to NOS uncoupling with shift from NO to superoxide (·O2−) generation [11, 12].
Ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) is associated with increased ·O2− generation, endothelial dysfunction and myocardial injury [13, 14]. In the isolated heart, ischemia time-dependently decreased recovery of post-ischemic coronary flow and this was concurrent with reduced myocardial BH4 levels and eNOS activity along with increased NOS-derived ·O2− [15]. In vitro BH4 supplementation partially restored eNOS activity, suppressed eNOS-derived ·O2−, and improved post-ischemic recovery of NOS-dependent coronary flow [15]. A number of animal studies have also demonstrated the protective effects of BH4 against in vivo I/R injury in many organs, including the heart, lung, liver, kidney and stomach [16–20]. While in vivo BH4 supplementation was reported to reduce post-ischemic myocardial injury [16], the extent to which alterations in endogenous BH4 availability and NOS coupling modulates myocardial salvage following in vivo I/R remains unclear.
Optimal availability of BH4 at target tissues is critical for stabilization and functional coupling of NOS [21, 22]. While suboptimal concentrations of BH4 lead to eNOS uncoupling, strategies to increase and maintain intracellular BH4 bioavailability have been difficult to achieve. The requirement for high doses and long times for pharmacological BH4 repletion confirms that BH4 does not enter cells by passive diffusion, and there may be cell-type-specific mechanisms of BH4 uptake and availability. Moreover, chemical instability and rapid oxidation of BH4 are major practical issues for its pharmacological use. Although several efforts have been made to increase BH4 bioavailability by combining it with other pharmacological agents such as vitamin C, folic acid or statins [23], the clinical efficacy of these combinations is either lacking or difficult to associate with BH4. Importantly, a novel synthetic analog of BH4 (Kuvan, Biomarin Pharmaceutical Inc., Novato, CA) failed to show any effect in clinical trials with hypertensive patients [24]; therefore, there is a great need for a suitable BH4 formulation for future BH4 therapy.
Liposomes are effective delivery systems for a variety of drugs, therapeutic proteins, gene molecules, and diagnostic agents, and liposomal formulations are reported to improve the therapeutic efficacy of drugs with poor bioavailability [25]. Importantly, low toxicity, low biodegradation and lack of immunity make liposomes useful in drug delivery. Therefore, instead of co-supplementation of BH4 with another pharmacological agent, we formulated BH4 within liposomes and demonstrated that this novel liposomal BH4 can rapidly reverse the loss of myocardial NOS activity and BH4 content during in vitro I/R [15].
Currently, it is not known how liposomal BH4 will affect myocardial BH4 levels and eNOS function during in vivo I/R, and whether liposomal BH4 protects the heart against acute I/R injury. Therefore, to address the role of liposomal BH4 and eNOS function in the process of in vivo myocardial I/R injury, rats were subjected to left coronary artery occlusion and varying periods of reperfusion with or without pre-ischemic intravenous liposomal BH4 supplementation. Myocardial infarction was correlated with BH4 content, NOS activity, post-translational modification of eNOS, and oxidative stress. We demonstrate that BH4 depletion occurs in post-ischemic myocardium triggering eNOS uncoupling, and that exogenous liposomal BH4 administration can prevent I/R-induced myocardial BH4 depletion, thus maintaining eNOS coupling, function and post-translational activation.
2. Methods
Animal protocols conformed to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH Publication No. 85–23, Revised 1996) and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
2.1 Animals, BH4 dosing and treatment protocols
Male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 250–280g were randomly allocated to different groups. 6R-BH4 (BH4) (1 mg/Kg, Cayman Chemical, USA) or 6S-BH4 (1 mg/kg, Schircks Laboratories, Switzerland) along with 0.2 mg/ml ascorbic acid in a liposomal formulation containing 100 mg/ml phosphatidylcholine (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS was directly injected into the jugular vein 5 min before ischemia (drug-treated group). Similar liposomal formulations without drug served as the vehicle-treated group. Liposomal BH4 formulations were used because we observed rapid tissue uptake, biocompatibility, and efficacy in the rat heart with acute administration [15]. The dose of intravenous BH4 was chosen as previously reported in other animal studies [19, 26]. In a group of rats, the effect of NOS inhibition on BH4-mediated alterations was evaluated by administration of L-NAME (10 mg/kg, iv) 15 min before vehicle or BH4. BH4 treatment protocols utilized 6R-BH4 except for one control testing the effect of the enzyme-inactive stereoisomer 6S-BH4 on myocardial infarction. In this study, BH4 denotes the 6R-BH4 form of the molecule.
2.2 In vivo myocardial I/R and measurement of myocardial infarction
In vivo myocardial I/R and myocardial infarct size measurements were performed in male Sprague–Dawley rats as described previously with slight modification [27]. After 60 min of regional ischemia and defined periods of reperfusion, hearts were either harvested for myocardial infarct size measurements, or the area at risk (AAR) and non-ischemic area (NI) from each heart were quickly separated as described with slight modification [28], frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C until used. For details, please see Supplemental Methods.
2.3 Measurement of myocardial NOS activity
The AAR of rat hearts was processed for myocardial NOS activity measurements as described previously [15, 29]. Hearts were rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen, finely ground, and suspended in 400 μL of ice-cold reaction buffer. NOS activity was measured from the conversion of L-[14C]arginine to L-[14C]citrulline and determined by subtracting total counts from L-NAME-inhibited counts and normalized for protein content and conversion time.
2.4 Measurement of myocardial BH4 by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)
Myocardial BH4 content was determined by HPLC with electrochemical detection as described previously [15]. The AAR and NI regions were rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen, finely ground, and suspended in water containing diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA, 0.2mM), dithiothreitol (DTT, 1 mM) and ascorbic acid (1 mg/ml) to prevent autoxidation. HPLC separation was performed and BH4 measured directly by the electrochemical cell set at + 50 mV. For details of the HPLC separation protocol, please see the Supplemental Methods.
2.5 Immunoblotting for eNOS
eNOS expression and eNOS Ser1177 phosphorylation in the AAR were measured by immunoblotting as described previously [29, 30]. Myocardial tissues from the AAR were frozen and homogenized in ice-cold RIPA buffer with phosphatase inhibitors. An equal amount of protein (80 μg) was loaded in each well and proteins were separated and electro-blotted to a nitrocellulose membrane. The signal intensity of blots was digitized and quantified using Image J from NIH.
2.6 Measurement of ROS and NO generation
ROS generation in myocardial tissue was determined using the redox dye dihydroethidium (DHE) [31]. After reperfusion, the hearts were cut distal to the LCA suture and cryo-fixed in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compound. 8-μm transverse sections from OCT-fixed hearts were covered with the probe solution containing DHE (10 μM) along with the nuclear stain DRAQ5 in absence or presence of L-NAME (1 mM) and/or Mn(III)tetrakis(4-benzoic acid)porphyrin (MnTBAP, 50 μM). In control experiments, addition of the SOD mimetic MnTBAP (100 μM) largely quenched the observed peak fluorescence (>80%). To detect NO generation, frozen sections were incubated with the fluorescent NO indicator dye CuFL (500 μM) in the absence or presence of L-NAME (1 mM) or PTIO (50 μM). Images were captured by confocal fluorescence microscopy and fluorescence intensity was quantified using the software FV10-ASW version 2.00.03.10.
2.7 Detection of nitrotyrosine on frozen sections
In a separate set of experiments, hearts from vehicle and BH4 treated rats were embedded on OCT and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. For immunocytochemistry, 5 μm-frozen sections were treated as follows: (i) fixed at room temperature with 3.7% paraformaldehyde for 10 minutes, (ii) permeabilized with 0.25% Triton X-100 in Tris-Buffered Saline (TBS) containing 0.01% Tween-20 (TBST) for 5 min, (iii) blocked for 30 min with 1% BSA in TBST, (iv) incubated with primary rabbit anti-nitrotyrosine in TBST + 1% BSA for 1 hr at room temperature, and (v) incubated with the respective secondary goat anti-rabbit, Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated (1:1000 dilutions) as necessary, for 1 h at room temperature. After thorough washing with TBST, the sections were mounted in anti-fade mounting medium (Fluoromount-G, Birmingham, AB) and examined using an Olympus FV 1000 confocal microscope (Olympus America Inc., Melville, NY) with the 60X objective with 405 nm and 488 nm excitations for DAPI and green fluorescence, respectively. For quantification of NT, three sections each from a different heart were analyzed and 3 fields from the infarct and non-infarct area were acquired with the same laser settings (with unstained sections used as controls). Using the Olympus FluoView Viewer v. 3.0, we measured the respective fluorescence intensity (arbitrary units) for each fluorophore, and results were averaged for each condition.
2.7 Statistical analysis
All results are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Data were analyzed either by two-tailed Student’s t-test for paired data from the same experiment and unpaired data from different experiments, or by ANOVA. A value of P <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
3. Results
3.1 Effects of 6R-BH4 (BH4) and 6S-BH4 on myocardial infarction
To investigate whether the effects of BH4 pretreatment are specific for NOS cofactor activity, myocardial infarction was determined for the effects of both 6R-BH4 and 6S-BH4 pretreatment. Similar AAR as a percentage of LV area was seen in control I/R, vehicle, 6R-BH4, 6S-BH4, L-NAME+vehicle (L+vehicle), and L-NAME+6R-BH4 (L+6R-BH4) groups with values of 61 ± 2, 60 ± 2, 61 ± 1, 60 ± 4%, 60 ± 3%, and 60 ± 2%, respectively. 6R-BH4 treatment markedly reduced myocardial infarct size compared to that in vehicle with values of 31 ± 2% vs. 60 ± 2, respectively (P<0.001, n=8/group) (Figures 1A and 1B). In contrast, 6S-BH4 treatment only slightly reduced myocardial infarct size compared to that in vehicle with values of 50 ± 2% vs. 60 ± 2, respectively (P<0.01, n=6–8/group). 6S-BH4 is 60-times less effective as a NOS cofactor than 6R-BH4 [32]; therefore, these data indicated that NOS cofactor activity is necessary for the potent cardioprotective effect of BH4. Importantly, in hearts pre-treated with L-NAME to block NOS, 6R-BH4 supplementation failed to decrease infarct size (Figure 1A and 1B), confirming the role of the NOS-NO pathway in the cardioprotective effect of BH4.
Figure 1.
A–B, Myocardial infarction in rat hearts subjected to 60-min LCA ligation and 24-hour reperfusion with and without vehicle, BH4 (6R-BH4), and 6S-BH4; and the effect of NOS inhibitor L-NAME on myocardial infarction of vehicle (L+Vehicle) or BH4 (L+6R-BH4) groups. Representative sections of the hearts stained with Evan’s blue and TTC after I/R are shown above the bar graphs. Area at risk (AAR) is expressed as a percentage of left ventricle (LV), AAR/LV. LV infarct area (IA) is expressed as a percentage of AAR. Values are means ± SEM. N=6–8/group. ***P<0.001, **P<0.01 vs. Control; &&&P<0.001, &&P<0.01 vs. Vehicle; ###P<0.001 vs. 6S-BH4; +++P<0.001 vs. L+Vehicle or L+6R-BH4.
3.2 Effect of ischemia and/or reperfusion on myocardial BH4 levels
To determine the effects of ischemia and/or reperfusion on myocardial BH4 levels, measurements were performed in vehicle-treated rats by HPLC with electrochemical detection (Figure 2A and Supplement Figure 1). BH4 levels in the AAR were greatly depleted during 60 min of regional ischemia compared to those in control hearts (0.032 ± 0.002 vs. 0.083 ± 0.005 nmol/g tissue). However, early reperfusion following ischemia did not cause further BH4 depletion. By 24 hours reperfusion, BH4 levels returned to basal values (0.084±0.009 nmol/g tissue). Importantly, BH4 levels in the NI area remained unchanged regardless of the time of ischemia and/or reperfusion. These data indicate that a sharp decline in BH4 levels in the ischemic area occurs following regional ischemia and/or early reperfusion and this could lead to NOS dysfunction and subsequent myocardial I/R injury.
Figure 2.
BH4 concentration in the area at risk (AAR) and non-ischemic (NI) area as determined by HPLC method. A, BH4 levels in the AAR and NI area of the heart after vehicle treatment. Data are mean ± SEM of 5 rats in each group. ***P<0.001 vs. 0-min I+0-min R (baseline) in AAR; †††P<0.001 vs. NI area. B, BH4 levels in the AAR and NI areas of the heart after BH4 (1mg/kg, iv) treatment. Values are means ± SEM of 5 rats in each group. ***P<0.001 vs. 0-min I+0-min R (baseline) in AAR; §§§P<0.001 vs. 0-min I+0-min R (baseline) in NI area.
3.3 Effects of exogenous BH4 administration on myocardial BH4 levels
The effects of pre-ischemic BH4 administration on myocardial BH4 levels before and following ischemia and/or reperfusion were determined. BH4 treatment resulted in markedly higher levels of baseline myocardial BH4 (~10-fold) compared to vehicle-treated control hearts (Figure 2A and 2B), with values of 0.97 ± 0.08 nmol/g tissue in the NI area and 0.95 ± 0.17 nmol/g tissue in the AAR. While 60-min ischemia caused sharp but comparable decline (>70%) in myocardial BH4 levels (Figure 2B) in both NI area and AAR (0.19 ± 0.03 nmol/g tissue in NI, 0.22 ± 0.04 nmol/g tissue in AAR), values remained ~2-fold and ~8-fold higher compared with respective NI area and AAR of the vehicle group (Figure 2A). Although BH4 levels in both NI area and AAR declined with reperfusion, the levels remained higher than levels in the vehicle group. Importantly, BH4 levels in both NI area and AAR remained the same regardless of ischemia and/or reperfusion, and BH4 levels in the AAR during ischemia and/or reperfusion were consistently higher compared with those of the vehicle group. Thus, BH4 pre-treatment maintained myocardial BH4 levels in ischemic and reperfused hearts above control values, which should prevent related NOS uncoupling and improve NOS function.
3.4 NOS activity after ischemia and/or reperfusion
To characterize the alterations in NOS function, NOS activity in the cardiac homogenates of AAR was measured in vitro by the L-[14C]-arginine to L-[14C]-citrulline conversion assay (Figure 3). NOS activity in non-ischemic control myocardium was 0.364 ± 0.023 pmol/min/mg protein; however, after 60 min of ischemia, NOS activity was greatly decreased to 0.004 ± 0.001 pmol/min/mg protein and after 10-min reperfusion it was 0.021 ± 0.002 pmol/min/mg protein. Interestingly, at 20-min reperfusion following 60-min ischemia, partial recovery was seen to 0.182 ± 0.007 pmol/min/mg protein. Moreover, following 60-min ischemia and 24-hr reperfusion, NOS activity recovered to 80% of control levels to 0.290 ± 0.002 pmol/min/mg protein, demonstrating that myocardial NOS dysfunction occurs during ischemia and early reperfusion. To evaluate whether the impaired NOS activity following ischemia and/or reperfusion is related to the availability of myocardial BH4, BH4 (10 μM) was added to cardiac homogenates for NOS activity. We observed that in vitro BH4 supplementation totally restored myocardial NOS activity in the cardiac homogenates obtained from ischemic and/or reperfused hearts, suggesting that a critical endogenous BH4 insufficiency might have occurred during ischemia and/or reperfusion. To further substantiate these findings, NOS activity was determined in hearts with pre-ischemic in vivo BH4 supplementation. Like the addition of BH4 in vitro, in vivo systemic BH4 supplementation also totally restored the NOS activity in the cardiac homogenates obtained following 60-min ischemia and 10-min reperfusion (in vitro BH4, 0.41±0.04 pmol/min/mg protein, n=4 vs. in vivo BH4, 0.42±0.04 pmol/min/mg protein, n =4).
Figure 3.
In vitro NOS activity in the area at risk (AAR) of rat hearts was measured by L-[14C]-arginine to L-[14C]-citrulline conversion in absence (open symbols) and presence (closed symbols) of added BH4 (10 μM). Values are means ± SEM. *P<0.05, ***P=0.001 vs. 0-min I/0-min R (baseline) without BH4 supplement; †P<0.05, ††P<0.01, †††P=0.001 vs. treatment with added BH4 (N=4/group).
3.5 Myocardial eNOS protein expression and phosphorylation
To evaluate how myocardial BH4 levels and NOS activity in the post-ischemic hearts are related to the levels of myocardial eNOS and its activated phosphorylated form (eNOS Ser1177 phosphorylation), immunoblotting was performed for total and phosphorylated eNOS in the AAR. While no change was seen with ischemia, after ischemia and reperfusion (10-min, 20-min or 24-hr reperfusion), myocardial eNOS levels in the AAR were significantly decreased in the vehicle group compared to baseline (0-min I + 0-min R), with a maximum decrease of ~60% seen at 10-min reperfusion (Figure 4A). In contrast, in the BH4-treated group, this decrease was largely abolished with only a maximum 35% decrease seen at 20-min reperfusion.
Figure 4.
Immunoblots of total eNOS (A) and its activated phosphorylated form (eNOS Ser1177 phosphorylation) (B) in the cardiac homogenates of area at risk. Top: Representative Western blots for eNOS proteins. Bottom: graphical presentation of the densitometric data. Open bars for vehicle-treated and filled bars for BH4-treated groups. At equal protein loading, post-ischemic total eNOS and eNOS Ser1177 phosphorylation were well-preserved with BH4 treatment compared to vehicle. Values are means ± SEM. N = 5/group. All data are compared with non-treated control hearts. *P<0.05 vs. 0-min I+0-min R (baseline) in BH4-treated group, †P<0.05, ††P<0.01, †††P<0.001 vs. 0-min I+0-min R (baseline) in vehicle-treated group; §§§P<0.001 vs. time-matched vehicle-treated group.
eNOS Ser1177 phosphorylation in the AAR of the vehicle group decreased significantly with ischemia and/or reperfusion, with a maximum decrease of ~80% seen at 20-min reperfusion (Figure 4B). BH4 pretreatment prevented this decrease in eNOS phosphorylation. These findings thus suggest that pre-ischemic BH4 treatment is able to delay and diminish the detrimental effects of I/R on myocardial eNOS, preserving both the expression and the activated state of the enzyme.
3.6 Myocardial ROS, RNS and NO generation
Myocardial I/R injury is associated with increased ·O2− generation during the early phase of reperfusion, and BH4 depletion in the post-ischemic heart can also trigger ·O2− generation from uncoupled NOS [13, 15]. Experiments were performed to determine how exogenous BH4 modulates the extent of ·O2− generation during I/R. Figure 5 shows that there was a robust increase in DHE fluorescence during ischemia and/or reperfusion in vehicle-treated hearts, and the maximum increase in ·O2− generation was seen at 10-min reperfusion. BH4 treatment significantly diminished ·O2− generation during ischemia and/or reperfusion compared with vehicle. While the SOD mimetic MnTBAP abolished the observed superoxide-derived fluorescence in both groups, L-NAME only decreased ·O2− generation in the vehicle group but not in the BH4 group (Figure 6A). This indicates that BH4 administration largely abolished NOS-derived ·O2− generation (Figure 6C). These findings indicate that pre-ischemic BH4 treatment not only decreases ·O2− generation during ischemia but also prevents further ROS generation during reperfusion.
Figure 5.

In situ myocardial superoxide generation following ischemia and/or reperfusion. A, Representative phase contrast (left column) and matching fluorescent photomicrographs (right column) of confocal microscopic sections of LV myocardium from vehicle- or BH4-treated groups labeled with the redox dye dihydroethidium (DHE). Each representative panel shows small blood vessel(s) and adjacent myocardium. Panels from top to bottom: 0-min I+0-min R; 60-min I+0-min R; 60-min I+10-min R; 60-min I+20-min R; 60-min I+24-hr R. Magnification 60x; bar, 40 μm. B, Bar graphs for the total intensity of ethidium fluorescence (in arbitrary units, AU) measured from the corresponding LV sections of vehicle- or BH4-treated hearts. Values are means ± SEM. N=3/group. **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 vs. 0-min I+0-min R (baseline) in vehicle-treated group; §§P<0.01, §§§P<0.001 vs. 0-min I+0-min R (baseline) in BH4-treated group; †††P<0.001 vs. time-matched BH4-treated group.
Figure 6.

In situ myocardial superoxide and NO generation following 60-min ischemia and 10-min reperfusion. A and B, Representative confocal fluorescent photomicrographs of LV myocardial sections labeled with the redox dye dihydroethidium (DHE) and NO-sensitive dye CuFL, respectively. Magnification 60x; bar, 40 μm. C, Bar graphs showing effects of NOS inhibitor L-NAME and SOD-mimetic MnTBAP on myocardial superoxide generation (in arbitrary units, AU). D, Bar graphs showing effects of NOS inhibitor L-NAME and NO scavenger PTIO on myocardial NO (in arbitrary units, AU). Values are means ± SEM. N=3/group. *P<0.05 vs. vehicle I/R; †P<0.05, †††P<0.001 vs. vehicle I/R; P<0.01, P<0.001 vs. BH4 I/R.
BH4 is a critical cofactor for NO production by NOS and we observed marked depletion of myocardial BH4 following I/R (Figure 2). To determine how exogenous BH4 modulates NO generation following I/R, myocardial NO generation was visualized using the fluorescent NO probe, CuFL (Figure 6B). BH4 treatment clearly increased NO generation following I/R compared to vehicle, with a nearly 3-fold increase seen, and NO was largely abolished by the NOS inhibitor L-NAME and the NO scavenger PTIO (Figure 6D). The L-NAME-sensitive NO production in the vehicle-treated group following I/R was ~75% decreased compared to that with BH4 treatment, and this decrease paralleled the observed ~75% depletion of BH4 (Fig. 2A). Together, these findings provide strong evidence that pre-ischemic BH4 treatment improves NOS coupling after I/R with preserved NO, but decreased ·O2− generation, leading to improved myocardial salvage.
The reaction of superoxide and NO is known to produce the highly reactive oxidant peroxynitrite, which combines with tyrosyl residues in proteins and produces the adduct 3-nitrotyrosine (NT). Therefore, assays of myocardial nitrotyrosine formation were performed in order to measure the relationship of ROS/RNS formation. Slides were stained with an anti-NT antibody and counterstained with DAPI for analysis. The amount of NT formation increased in a time-dependent fashion in the infarct (Fig. 7A and 7B). As expected, NT formation was attenuated with BH4 treatment. The formation of NT paralleled that observed above for superoxide as would be expected for superoxide-mediated formation of peroxynitrite that nitrates tyrosine.
Figure 7.

Nitrotyrosine formation following ischemia-reperfusion. A, Detection of nitrotyrosine (NT) in myocardium of rat subjected to in vivo ischemia reperfusion. Representative sections of the vehicle- and BH4-treated hearts probed for nitrotyrosine (green fluorescence). Each representative panel shows small blood vessel(s) and adjacent myocardium. Panels from top to bottom: 0-min I+0-min R; 60-min I+0-min R; 60-min I+10-min R; 60-min I+20-min R; 60-min I+24-hr R. Magnification 60x; bar, 40 μm. B, Bar graphs for the total intensity of nitrotyrosine formation (green fluorescence in arbitrary units, AU) measured from the corresponding LV ± SEM. N=3/group. *P<0.001 vs. sections of vehicle- or BH4-treated hearts. Values are means time matched vehicle I/R.
4. Discussion
The major goal of this study was to investigate the role of eNOS uncoupling secondary to BH4 depletion in the process of in vivo myocardial I/R injury, and the ability of systemic liposomal BH4 to protect the heart. We observe that BH4 depletion occurs in ischemic myocardium triggering eNOS uncoupling with loss of total and activated eNOS. Furthermore, exogenous liposomal 6R-BH4 (BH4) supplementation prior to myocardial ischemia resulted in: (1) smaller myocardial infarction (MI); (2) preserved myocardial BH4 in the ischemic area; (3) preserved total and activated phosphorylated eNOS levels; (4) decreased levels of myocardial ROS during I/R; and (5) increased levels of myocardial NO during I/R. While all of these findings were associated with protected NOS activity in BH4-supplemented ischemic and reperfused myocardium, inhibition of the NOS-NO pathway with L-NAME abolished post-ischemic myocardial NO and the cardioprotective effect of BH4. Importantly, the stereoisomer 6S-BH4 with <60% NOS cofactor activity, only slightly protected the myocardium against I/R injury. Thus, these findings clearly demonstrate that myocardial eNOS uncoupling, accompanied by BH4 depletion and increased oxidant stress, plays an important role in myocardial I/R injury, and pre-ischemic liposomal BH4 supplementation can effectively provide acute cardioprotection.
Impaired NOS-NO function following I/R is an important factor in the development of myocardial I/R injury [33, 34]. NO is the basis of many infarct-sparing strategies [35], and elevating NO by providing a NO donor or decreasing its scavenging by ·O2−, just prior to or at reperfusion, is cardioprotective [36–38]. We observed that myocardial ischemia time-dependently leads to depletion of BH4 with decreased NOS activity and increased ·O2− production and these can be partially reversed by exogenous BH4 [15]. Acute intra-arterial or intra-venous infusion of BH4 in humans increases myocardial blood flow in healthy individuals [39], and restores or improves endothelial function of coronary arteries in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and hypercholesterolaemia [40, 41]. Therefore, reversing NOS uncoupling with BH4 supplementation might provide effective protection in patients with CAD and acute MI.
BH4 depletion is involved in both endothelial and cardiomyocyte dysfunction in hearts following I/R [15, 29]. Recently, beneficial effects of BH4 or substrate for BH4 synthesis (sepiapterin) were reported in a rat model of in vivo myocardial I/R [16, 42]; however, there were no reports as to how endogenous BH4 levels change over time in ischemic myocardium during in vivo I/R and how BH4 depletion is related to myocardial infarction, NOS function, eNOS expression, and oxidative stress. Our current study demonstrates that 60 min of in vivo regional ischemia markedly decreases myocardial BH4 levels in the ischemic zone but not in the non-ischemic region; however, after 24 hours of reperfusion, BH4 levels in the ischemic zone recover to levels in the non-ischemic region. Pre-ischemic liposomal BH4 supplementation totally blocked depletion of myocardial BH4 during ischemia with identical levels in both ischemic and non-ischemic areas during I/R. Importantly, the preserved myocardial BH4 content was accompanied by reduced myocardial infarction. Thus, depletion of myocardial BH4 during ischemia and reperfusion critically contributes to in vivo I/R injury, and restoration of myocardial BH4 confers protection against in vivo I/R injury.
Cellular levels of BH4 are a key factor regulating eNOS activity, NO production, and vascular reactivity in the post-ischemic heart [15, 29]. Under pathophysiological conditions, deficiency of BH4 is a primary cause of eNOS uncoupling with shift of eNOS from NO to ·O2− generation [11, 43–45]. Of note, BH4 is also an essential cofactor required for enzyme coupling and NO production from all NOS isoforms including nNOS and iNOS, as well as eNOS [45–47]. We observed >90% loss of NOS activity after 60 min of ischemia and during early reperfusion; however, it recovered to 80% of basal levels after 24 hours of reperfusion. The findings with NOS activity correlated well with the measured myocardial BH4 levels (Figure 2), where a marked loss of BH4 was seen following ischemia and early reperfusion that recovered to control levels after 24 hours of reperfusion; and pre-ischemic BH4 supplementation prevented the depletion of myocardial BH4 during ischemia and/or reperfusion. Importantly, pre-ischemic liposomal BH4 administration maintained eNOS coupling during I/R compared with higher NO production and decreased ·O2− generation (Figure 6). Thus, these findings suggest that BH4 depletion is a critical factor in acute I/R injury and that its supplementation can confer protection.
Post-translational modification of eNOS modulates its enzymatic activity and NO production [48], and eNOS phosphorylation at Ser1177 is a pivotal mechanism of eNOS activation modulating vasodilation and cardioprotection [49]. The functional consequences of eNOS Ser1177 phosphorylation have been studied in detail [48, 49], and this modification confers greater eNOS activation at low calcium levels without substantially changing the affinity of calcium-activated CaM for eNOS [30, 50]. In this study, we observed that the decrease in myocardial eNOS Ser1177 phosphorylation following I/R was more pronounced than the decrease in the total eNOS protein (Figure 4). This suggests that decreased eNOS phosphorylation could be an important mechanism magnifying the loss of NO production during myocardial I/R. More importantly, we observed that BH4 supplementation increased eNOS Ser1177 phosphorylation levels while preventing the decrease in total eNOS protein. This novel observation further indicates that BH4 is critical for maintaining normal eNOS function and activation state following I/R.
We observed that both eNOS expression and Ser1177 phosphorylation are both decreased following I/R; however, BH4 treatment prevented this decrease in eNOS expression and phosphorylation. Therefore, in addition to preservation of NOS activity and NO production, BH4 supplementation prevents the I/R-induced decrease in eNOS expression and phosphorylation. We have recently observed that when eNOS uncoupling occurs seccondary to BH4 depletion, the ROS and RNS formed oxidize the protein with the formation of protein thiyl radicals [51, 52]. This oxidation of eNOS may mark the protein for ubiquitination and degradation by the the ubiquitin-proteasomal pathway. It has recently been reported eNOS uncoupling triggered by smoking exposure triggers eNOS ubiquitination followed by degradation by the 26S proteasomal complex [53, 54]. Interestingly, ubiquitination and degradation of Akt, the major kinase inducing eNOS Ser1177 phsophorylation was also seen. Thus, a similar process of oxidant induced eNOS and Akt degradation may also occur in the postischemic heart and serve to explain the loss of eNOS and phosphorylated eNOS.
Oxidant stress following ischemia and reperfusion is an important mechanism triggering post-ischemic myocardial injury [37, 38]. In the heart, potential sources of ROS include xanthine oxidase, activated neutrophils, NADPH oxidase, the mitochondrial electron transport system, and uncoupled eNOS [38]. BH4 bioavailability is strongly influenced by oxidative stress with inhibition of its de novo synthesis and oxidation of the redox-sensitive BH4 to inactive dihydrobiopterin (BH2) [43, 55]. In addition, eNOS itself, under conditions of oxidative stress with BH4 depletion, generates ·O2− that can also react with NO to produce the potent oxidant peroxynitrite that readily reacts with and consumes BH4 [56]. Thus, after an initial oxidant stress with I/R that partially depletes cellular BH4 levels, a vicious cycle of further ·O2− and peroxynitrite is triggered to exhaust BH4 level and eNOS activity. Therefore, with optimal myocardial BH4 levels and its anti-oxidant effect, pre-ischemic BH4 supplementation not only prevents the I/R-induced primary oxidant stress and myocardial protein degradation, it maintains normal eNOS coupling and enzyme activation for cardioprotection.
We observed that with major depletion of BH4 during ischemia and early reperfusion (Figure 2 and Supplement Figure 1), NOS uncoupling occurs with increase in myocardial ·O2− formation (Figures 5 and 6). Importantly, pre-ischemic liposomal BH4 supplementation not only critically diminished myocardial ·O2− generation during ischemia, it blocked further increase in ·O2− during reperfusion. Interestingly, the NOS inhibitor L-NAME decreased the acute I/R-induced increase in myocardial ·O2− in the vehicle group but not in the BH4 group (Figure 6). In addition, the infarct limiting effect of BH4 was abolished by L-NAME pre-treatment (Figure 1C–D); and the stereoisomer 6S-BH4, with comparable antioxidant properties as BH4 (6R-BH4) but <60% NOS cofactor activity, exerted minimal effect in limiting infarct (Figure 1A–B). Thus, depletion of BH4 during acute in vivo myocardial I/R uncouples eNOS function with subsequent ·O2− generation, but pre-ischemic BH4 supplementation maintains myocardial eNOS coupling with diminished myocardial ·O2− generation and confers myocardial protection.
To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive in vivo study characterizing myocardial BH4 levels along with eNOS expression, activity, coupling and activation state during ischemia and reperfusion. We chose to test the efficacy of liposomal BH4 supplementation after a prolonged ischemic duration of 60 minutes, since our earlier in vitro studies [15] demonstrated that 60-min ischemia completely depleted myocardial BH4 with parallel decrease in NOS activity. In this study, we observed that 60 min of ischemia alone or 60 min of ischemia followed by 10 min of reperfusion caused >60–70% decrease in myocardial BH4 content and eNOS Ser1177 phosphorylation in the AAR with almost undetectable NOS activity, and this was accompanied by robust myocardial ·O2− generation. With 20 min of reperfusion, further decrease in activated eNOS was seen. Following 24 hours of reperfusion, BH4 and eNOS expression and activity levels were largely restored to near baseline values. The specific novel aspects of this study include: (1) in vivo liposomal BH4 administration demonstrating acute myocardial uptake and availability after a single intravenous dose; (2) post-ischemic preservation of myocardial BH4 content, activated eNOS protein and eNOS enzyme activity with significantly lower levels of myocardial ·O2− and increased levels of myocardial NO after liposomal BH4; and (3) increased post-ischemic myocardial salvage. Thus, in vivo liposomal BH4 protects against I/R injury through reversal of NOS uncoupling/dysfunction with restoration of NO generation and suppressed ·O2− production.
In conclusion, our results demonstrate that NOS uncoupling occurs with in vivo I/R and can be prevented by exogenous liposomal BH4 administration with reduction of oxidant stress and myocardial injury. In view of this highly effective restoration of NOS function with resultant myocardial protection, administration of systemic liposomal BH4 could be a prophylactic pre-medication with the potential to confer acute cardioprotection and reversal of endothelial dysfunction in patients with acute coronary syndromes and revascularization surgery.
Supplementary Material
Highlights.
The role of the eNOS cofactor, BH4, in ischemia-reperfusion injury was studied.
BH4 was depleted during ischemia and early reperfusion in the area at risk.
NOS activity and phosphorylation were reduced during ischemia and early reperfusion.
Liposomal BH4 treatment preserved eNOS coupling, activity and phosphorylation.
Liposomal BH4 treatment decreased myocardial ROS generation and infarction.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by NIH grants HL63744, HL65608, HL38324, HL64140 and EB016096 to JLZ. The authors thank Dr. Tiansheng Wang for carrying out some preliminary experiments related to this study, and Tse-Yao Wang for his technical support in NOS activity assays.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest: None
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Massion PB, Feron O, Dessy C, Balligand JL. Nitric oxide and cardiac function: ten years after, and continuing. Circ Res. 2003;93:388–98. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000088351.58510.21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Moncada S, Palmer RM, Higgs EA. Nitric oxide: physiology, pathophysiology, and pharmacology. Pharmacol Rev. 1991;43:109–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Furchgott RF, Vanhoutte PM. Endothelium-derived relaxing and contracting factors. The FASEB Journal. 1989;3:12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kwon NS, Nathan CF, Stuehr DJ. Reduced biopterin as a cofactor in the generation of nitrogen oxides by murine macrophages. J Biol Chem. 1989;264:20496–501. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tayeh MA, Marletta MA. Macrophage oxidation of L-arginine to nitric oxide, nitrite, and nitrate. Tetrahydrobiopterin is required as a cofactor. J Biol Chem. 1989;264:19654–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kojima S, Ona S, Iizuka I, Arai T, Mori H, Kubota K. Antioxidative activity of 5,6,7,8-tetrahydrobiopterin and its inhibitory effect on paraquat-induced cell toxicity in cultured rat hepatocytes. Free Radic Res. 1995;23:419–30. doi: 10.3109/10715769509065263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Vasquez-Vivar J, Hogg N, Martasek P, Karoui H, Pritchard KA, Jr, Kalyanaraman B. Tetrahydrobiopterin-dependent inhibition of superoxide generation from neuronal nitric oxide synthase. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:26736–42. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.38.26736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ihlemann N, Rask-Madsen C, Perner A, Dominguez H, Hermann T, Kober L, et al. Tetrahydrobiopterin restores endothelial dysfunction induced by an oral glucose challenge in healthy subjects. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003;285:H875–82. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00008.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Werner-Felmayer G, Werner ER, Fuchs D, Hausen A, Reibnegger G, Schmidt K, et al. Pteridine biosynthesis in human endothelial cells. Impact on nitric oxide-mediated formation of cyclic GMP. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:1842–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bendall JK, Alp NJ, Warrick N, Cai S, Adlam D, Rockett K, et al. Stoichiometric relationships between endothelial tetrahydrobiopterin, endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) activity, and eNOS coupling in vivo: insights from transgenic mice with endothelial-targeted GTP cyclohydrolase 1 and eNOS overexpression. Circulation research. 2005;97:864–71. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000187447.03525.72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Xia Y, Tsai AL, Berka V, Zweier JL. Superoxide generation from endothelial nitric-oxide synthase. A Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent and tetrahydrobiopterin regulatory process. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:25804–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.40.25804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Laursen JB, Somers M, Kurz S, McCann L, Warnholtz A, Freeman BA, et al. Endothelial regulation of vasomotion in apoE-deficient mice: implications for interactions between peroxynitrite and tetrahydrobiopterin. Circulation. 2001;103:1282–8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.9.1282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zweier JL, Flaherty JT, Weisfeldt ML. Direct measurement of free radical generation following reperfusion of ischemic myocardium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987;84:1404–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.5.1404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bolli R, Jeroudi MO, Patel BS, DuBose CM, Lai EK, Roberts R, et al. Direct evidence that oxygen-derived free radicals contribute to postischemic myocardial dysfunction in the intact dog. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86:4695–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.12.4695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dumitrescu C, Biondi R, Xia Y, Cardounel AJ, Druhan LJ, Ambrosio G, et al. Myocardial ischemia results in tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) oxidation with impaired endothelial function ameliorated by BH4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:15081–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702986104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wajima T, Shimizu S, Hiroi T, Ishii M, Kiuchi Y. Reduction of myocardial infarct size by tetrahydrobiopterin: possible involvement of mitochondrial KATP channels activation through nitric oxide production. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2006;47:243–9. doi: 10.1097/01.fjc.0000201360.71813.8a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Schmid RA, Hillinger S, Walter R, Zollinger A, Stammberger U, Speich R, et al. The nitric oxide synthase cofactor tetrahydrobiopterin reduces allograft ischemia-reperfusion injury after lung transplantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;118:726–32. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(99)70019-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sucher R, Gehwolf P, Oberhuber R, Hermann M, Margreiter C, Werner ER, et al. Tetrahydrobiopterin protects the kidney from ischemia-reperfusion injury. Kidney Int. 2010;77:681–9. doi: 10.1038/ki.2010.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dai Y, Cui J, Cun Y, Shi A. Tetrahydrobiopterin ameliorates hepatic ischemia-reperfusion Injury by coupling with eNOS in mice. J Surg Res. 2012;176:e65–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.12.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ishii M, Shimizu S, Nawata S, Kiuchi Y, Yamamoto T. Involvement of reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide in gastric ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats: protective effect of tetrahydrobiopterin. Dig Dis Sci. 2000;45:93–8. doi: 10.1023/a:1005413511320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Alkaitis MS, Crabtree MJ. Recoupling the cardiac nitric oxide synthases: tetrahydrobiopterin synthesis and recycling. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2012;9:200–10. doi: 10.1007/s11897-012-0097-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ali ZA, Rinze R, Douglas G, Hu Y, Xiao Q, Qi W, et al. Tetrahydrobiopterin determines vascular remodeling through enhanced endothelial cell survival and regeneration. Circulation. 2013;128:S50–8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Moens AL, Kietadisorn R, Lin JY, Kass D. Targeting endothelial and myocardial dysfunction with tetrahydrobiopterin. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2011;51:559–63. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2011.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cunnington C, Van Assche T, Shirodaria C, Kylintireas I, Lindsay AC, Lee JM, et al. Systemic and vascular oxidation limits the efficacy of oral tetrahydrobiopterin treatment in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2012;125:1356–66. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.038919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mufamadi MS, Pillay V, Choonara YE, Du Toit LC, Modi G, Naidoo D, et al. A review on composite liposomal technologies for specialized drug delivery. J Drug Deliv. 2011;2011:939851. doi: 10.1155/2011/939851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Szabo G, Seres L, Soos P, Gorenflo M, Merkely B, Horkay F, et al. Tetrahydrobiopterin improves cardiac and pulmonary function after cardiopulmonary bypass. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;40:695–700. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.12.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lee DS, Steinbaugh GE, Quarrie R, Yang F, Talukder MAH, Zweier JL, et al. Ischemic postconditioning does not provide cardioprotection from long-term ischemic injury in isolated male or female rat hearts. J Surg Res. 2010;164:175–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.08.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sam F, Sawyer DB, Chang DL, Eberli FR, Ngoy S, Jain M, et al. Progressive left ventricular remodeling and apoptosis late after myocardial infarction in mouse heart. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2000;279:H422–8. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.2000.279.1.H422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Giraldez RR, Panda A, Xia Y, Sanders SP, Zweier JL. Decreased nitric-oxide synthase activity causes impaired endothelium-dependent relaxation in the postischemic heart. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:21420–6. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.34.21420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chen C-A, Druhan LJ, Varadharaj S, Chen Y-R, Zweier JL. Phosphorylation of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase regulates superoxide generation from the enzyme. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:27038–47. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M802269200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kin H, Zhao Z-Q, Sun H-Y, Wang N-P, Corvera JS, Halkos ME, et al. Postconditioning attenuates myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury by inhibiting events in the early minutes of reperfusion. Cardiovasc Res. 2004;62:74–85. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2004.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Klatt P, Schmid M, Leopold E, Schmidt K, Werner ER, Mayer B. The pteridine binding site of brain nitric oxide synthase. Tetrahydrobiopterin binding kinetics, specificity, and allosteric interaction with the substrate domain. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:13861–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Schulz R, Kelm M, Heusch G. Nitric oxide in myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. Cardiovasc Res. 2004;61:402–13. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2003.09.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Talukder MAH, Yang F, Shimokawa H, Zweier JL. eNOS is required for acute in vivo ischemic preconditioning of the heart: effects of ischemic duration and sex. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2010;299:H437–45. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00384.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Cohen MV, Yang X-M, Downey JM. Nitric oxide is a preconditioning mimetic and cardioprotectant and is the basis of many available infarct-sparing strategies. Cardiovasc Res. 2006;70:231–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.10.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Gourine AV, Bulhak AA, Gonon AT, Pernow J, Sjoquist P-O. Cardioprotective effect induced by brief exposure to nitric oxide before myocardial ischemia-reperfusion in vivo. Nitric Oxide. 2002;7:210–6. doi: 10.1016/s1089-8603(02)00114-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zweier JL. Measurement of superoxide-derived free radicals in the reperfused heart. Evidence for a free radical mechanism of reperfusion injury. J Biol Chem. 1988;263:1353–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zweier JL, Talukder MAH. The role of oxidants and free radicals in reperfusion injury. Cardiovasc Res. 2006;70:181–90. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2006.02.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Walter R, Kaufmann PA, Buck A, Berthold T, Wyss C, von Schulthess GK, et al. Tetrahydrobiopterin increases myocardial blood flow in healthy volunteers: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Swiss Med Wkly. 2001;131:91–4. doi: 10.4414/smw.2001.06147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Maier W, Cosentino F, Lutolf RB, Fleisch M, Seiler C, Hess OM, et al. Tetrahydrobiopterin improves endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2000;35:173–8. doi: 10.1097/00005344-200002000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Fukuda Y, Teragawa H, Matsuda K, Yamagata T, Matsuura H, Chayama K. Tetrahydrobiopterin restores endothelial function of coronary arteries in patients with hypercholesterolaemia. Heart. 2002;87:264–9. doi: 10.1136/heart.87.3.264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Tiefenbacher CP, Lee C-H, Kapitza J, Dietz V, Niroomand F. Sepiapterin reduces postischemic injury in the rat heart. Pflugers Arch. 2003;447:1–7. doi: 10.1007/s00424-003-1131-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Schmidt TS, Alp NJ. Mechanisms for the role of tetrahydrobiopterin in endothelial function and vascular disease. Clin Sci (Lond) 2007;113:47–63. doi: 10.1042/CS20070108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Vasquez-Vivar J, Kalyanaraman B, Martasek P, Hogg N, Masters BS, Karoui H, et al. Superoxide generation by endothelial nitric oxide synthase: the influence of cofactors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:9220–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.16.9220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.De Pascali F, Hemann C, Samons K, Chen C-A, Zweier JL. Hypoxia and reoxygenation induce endothelial nitric oxide synthase uncoupling in endothelial cells through tetrahydrobiopterin depletion and S-glutathionylation. Biochemistry. 2014;53:3679–88. doi: 10.1021/bi500076r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Sun J, Druhan LJ, Zweier JL. Dose dependent effects of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species on the function of neuronal nitric oxide synthase. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2008;471:126–33. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2008.01.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sun J, Druhan LJ, Zweier JL. Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species regulate inducible nitric oxide synthase function shifting the balance of nitric oxide and superoxide production. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2010;494:130–7. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2009.11.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Mount PF, Kemp BE, Power DA. Regulation of endothelial and myocardial NO synthesis by multi-site eNOS phosphorylation. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2007;42:271–9. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2006.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kukreja RC, Xi L. eNOS phosphorylation: a pivotal molecular switch in vasodilation and cardioprotection? J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2007;42:280–2. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2006.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.McCabe TJ, Fulton D, Roman LJ, Sessa WC. Enhanced electron flux and reduced calmodulin dissociation may explain “calcium-independent” eNOS activation by phosphorylation. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:6123–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.9.6123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Chen CA, Lin CH, Druhan LJ, Wang TY, Chen YR, Zweier JL. Superoxide induces endothelial nitric-oxide synthase protein thiyl radical formation, a novel mechanism regulating eNOS function and coupling. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:29098–107. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.240127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Chen C-A, De Pascali F, Basye A, Hemann C, Zweier JL. Redox modulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase by glutaredoxin-1 through reversible oxidative post-translational modification. Biochemistry. 2013;52:6712–23. doi: 10.1021/bi400404s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ismail R. Role of the Ubiquitin Proteasome System in Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Dysfunction: Potential Biomarkers of Cigarette Smoking-Induced Vascular Endothelial Damage. The Toxicologist, Supplement to Toxicological Sciences. 2015;144:1818. [Google Scholar]
- 54.El-Mahdy MA. Vascular Changes following Secondhand Cigarette Smoke Exposure: Mechanistic Study in a Male Mouse Model. The Toxicologist, Supplement to Toxicological Sciences. 2015;144:1817. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Schulz E, Jansen T, Wenzel P, Daiber A, Munzel T. Nitric oxide, tetrahydrobiopterin, oxidative stress, and endothelial dysfunction in hypertension. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2008;10:1115–26. doi: 10.1089/ars.2007.1989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wang P, Zweier JL. Measurement of nitric oxide and peroxynitrite generation in the postischemic heart. Evidence for peroxynitrite-mediated reperfusion injury. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:29223–30. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.46.29223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




