Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2015 Sep 3;5:13805. doi: 10.1038/srep13805

Genetic association of RIT2 rs12456492 polymorphism and Parkinson’s disease susceptibility in Asian populations: a meta-analysis

Yanjun Lu 1,*, Wei Liu 2,*, Kun Tan 3, Jing Peng 1, Yaowu Zhu 1, Xiong Wang 1,a
PMCID: PMC4558715  PMID: 26334395

Abstract

Recent studies investigating the association of the Ras-like without CAAX 2 (RIT2) polymorphism, rs12456492, with Parkinson’s disease (PD) are controversial. We performed a meta-analysis to study the association between rs12456492 and PD susceptibility in Asian populations. Literature searches of PubMed and Embase were performed up to June 3, 2015, and the strength of the association between rs12456492 and PD was evaluated by odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Four studies conducted between 2013 and 2015, comprising 2017 PD cases and 2010 controls, were included in the meta-analysis. Significant association of rs12456492 with PD was found in the dominant (GG + AG vs. AA: OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.20–1.44, P = 0.00) and additive models (GG vs. AA: OR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.03–1.83, P = 0.030). Although sensitivity analysis found that the overall result was stable only in the dominant genetic model, a publication bias was also detected. Therefore, the results should be treated with caution. The current meta-analysis suggested that rs12456492 might be associated with increased PD risk in Asian populations, but studies using larger sample sizes and different ethnic populations will be needed to further confirm this association.


Parkinson’s disease (PD) is an age-related, progressive, complex neurodegenerative disease, which significantly affects quality of life and affects approximately 1% of people over 60 years of age. The disease is characterized behaviorally by motor and non-motor symptoms and pathologically by aggregations of the α-synuclein protein1,2. PD involves both genetic and environmental factors, and associations between hereditary PD and mutations in certain genes have been identified, including LRRK2, PARKIN, DJ1, ATP13A2, VPS35, PINK1, and SNCA3,4,5. However, these mutations account for only a small percentage of PD cases, and the majority of PD cases are the sporadic form of the disease, indicating that additional genes may also contribute to the risk of PD.

Recently, several genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified numerous genes associated with sporadic PD, including SNCA, GBA, MAPT, and HLA6,7. In 2012, Pankratz et al. identified an association between a polymorphism in Ras-like without CAAX 2 (RIT2), rs12456492, and PD risk in a large White population when performing a meta-analysis of GWAS results8. Several studies have shown results that were similar to those of Pankratz et al.9,10,11; however, Lin et al. found no association between rs12456492 and PD in a Taiwanese population12. To derive a more precise estimation of the association between rs12456492 and PD in Asian populations, we carried out the current meta-analysis, aiming to study the role of rs12456492 in PD pathogenesis and to explain the possible reasons for the controversial results.

Methods

Search strategy

Literature searches were performed using PubMed and Embase. The search strategy was based on the following search terms, “Parkinson’s disease or PD” and “Ras-like without CAAX 2 or RIT2 or Rin or rs12456492” and “polymorphism or mutation or variation or SNP”, with the last report up to June 3, 2015. All eligible studies were retrieved, and their bibliographies were examined for relevant publications.

Inclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria for studies were as follows: (1) association shown between rs12456492 and PD risk in Asian populations; (2) case-control design; and (3) available phenotype or allele frequencies of rs12456492 in cases and controls. Abstracts from conferences, studies without sufficient data for odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), republished or duplicate studies, and reviews were excluded.

Data extraction

Data from eligible studies were extracted by Yanjun Lu and Wei Liu, according to the above inclusion and exclusion criteria. The following information was collected from each study: the first author, year of publication, country, ethnicity of the sample population, sample size, phenotype distribution, and minor allele frequency (MAF).

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed by STATA software, version 11.0 (STATA Corp., College Station, TX, USA). Hardy Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in the control group of each study was examined, and P < 0.05 was considered as departure from HWE. The association between rs12456492 and risk of PD was evaluated by pooled OR and 95% CI. Four genetic models, including the allelic (G vs. A), dominant (GG + AG vs. AA), recessive (GG vs. AG + AA), and additive (GG vs. AA), were used to analyze the association. The significance of the pooled OR was assessed by the Z test, and P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. The Q-test and I2 tests were used to investigate the heterogeneity between studies. If P > 0.10 for the Q-test, or if I2 < 50%, the fixed-effect model was used to calculate the pooled ORs; if P < 0.10 for the Q-test, or if I2 > 50%, the random-effect model was applied. Sensitivity analysis was carried out by sequentially omitting one study at a time to estimate the stability of the result. Publication bias among studies was determined using Begg’s test and Egger’s test.

Results

Study selection and characteristics

The selection process of studies included in this meta-analysis is shown in Figure S1. The initial search found 42 studies (PubMed: 33, Embase: 9). Of these, four studies in Embase were also found in PubMed; therefore, 38 total studies were identified. After a careful abstract or full-text review, one review, 30 irrelevant studies, and two articles without sufficient genotype information8,13 were excluded. The remaining five studies were selected, and the data were extracted from these. However, a study conducted by Nie et al. departed from HWE (P = 0.03), and their data were therefore excluded from further meta-analysis11. Finally, four studies published between 2013 and 2015 comprising 2017 PD cases and 2010 controls were included in the current meta-analysis9,10,12,14. Emamalizadeh et al. chose an Asian population in Iran10, therefore, all the included four studies were Asian populations. The characteristics and genotypes included in these studies are listed in Tables 1 and 2.

Table 1. Characteristics of four studies included in this meta-analysis.

Author Year Region Ethnicity Sample size
Case Control
Liu ZH 2015 China Asian 460 473
Wang JY 2015 China Asian 537 517
Emamalizadeh B 2014 Iran Asian 520 520
Lin CH 2013 Taiwan Asian 500 500

Table 2. Genotype frequencies of rs12456492 in four studies included in this meta-analysis.

Author Case
Control
MAF
HWE
GG AG AA GG AG AA Case Control
Liu ZH 100 225 135 84 212 177 0.462 0.402 0.141
Wang JY 96 257 184 74 229 214 0.418 0.365 0.317
Emamalizadeh B 111 247 162 72 265 183 0.451 0.393 0.122
Lin CH 171 252 77 189 236 75 0.594 0.614 0.925

Meta-analysis results

First, the heterogeneity of rs12456492 in the pooled population was evaluated. The results showed clear heterogeneity in the allelic, recessive, and additive genetic models (Table 3). The ORs and 95% CIs in random- and fixed-effect models were calculated according to the values of PQ and I2. We found that rs12456492 was significantly associated with an increased risk of PD in the dominant and additive genetic models in the pooled Asian populations (P < 0.05; Fig. 1).

Table 3. Meta-analysis of rs12456492 polymorphism and risk of PD in Asian populations.

Genetic comparison PQ I2 Random model 95% CI PZ Fixed model 95% CI PZ
Overall (n = 4)
 G vs. A 0.027 67.4% 1.17 (1.00–1.37) 0.050    
 GG + AG vs. AA 0.310 16.3%     1.26 (1.10–1.44) 0.001
 GG vs. AG + AA 0.011 73.3% 1.23 (0.92–1.66) 0.167    
 GG vs. AA 0.055 60.5% 1.38 (1.03–1.83) 0.030    
MAF < 0.5 (n = 3)
 G vs. A 0.986 0.0%     1.27 (1.14–1.40) 0.000
 GG + AG vs. AA 0.623 0.0%     1.33 (1.14–1.54) 0.000
 GG vs. AG + AA 0.426 0.0%     1.42 (1.17–1.71) 0.000
 GG vs. AA 0.849 0.0%     1.60 (1.30–1.98) 0.000

Figure 1. Forest plots for meta-analysis of rs12456492 polymorphism and risk of PD in Asian populations.

Figure 1

(A) Allelic model (G vs. A). (B) Dominant genetic model (GG + AG vs. AA). (C) Recessive genetic model (GG vs. AG + AA). (D) Addictive genetic model (GG vs. AA).

We performed a stratified analysis by MAF (>0.5 vs. <0.5), and the results showed that rs12456492 was significantly associated with PD in all four genetic models in the subgroup with a MAF < 0.5 (Table 3).

Heterogeneity test and sensitivity analysis

Meta-regression was performed to explore the source of heterogeneity, considering the publication year and MAF (>0.5 vs. <0.5) as possible covariates. No covariate significantly contributing to the heterogeneity in any genetic model was found (Table 4). However, MAF tended to influence the heterogeneity in the allelic and recessive genetic models (P = 0.094, P = 0.091 respectively). In the overall analysis, rs12456492 was not associated with PD risk in the allelic or recessive genetic models, while in the MAF < 0.05 subgroup, rs12456492 was significantly associated with PD risk in both genetic models. These data suggest that MAF may slightly influence the heterogeneity.

Table 4. Meta-regression of rs12456492 polymorphism and risk of PD in Asian populations.

Genetic comparison t P > |t| 95% CI
Publication year
 G vs. A 2.38 0.140 −0.12–0.40
 GG + AG vs. AA 1.86 0.205 −0.23–0.58
 GG vs. AG + AA 1.03 0.411 −0.55–0.90
 GG vs. AA 1.60 0.251 −0.40–0.88
MAF
 G vs. A −3.03 0.094 −0.77–0.13
 GG + AG vs. AA −1.62 0.246 −1.14–0.51
 GG vs. AG + AA −3.09 0.091 −1.21–0.19
 GG vs. AA −2.70 0.114 −1.55–0.36

The sensitivity analysis showed that in the allelic and recessive genetic models, after omitting Lin et al.’s study, rs1245692 was associated with PD (allelic: OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.14–1.40, P = 0.000; recessive: OR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.17–1.71, P = 0.000). In the additive genetic model, the sensitivity analysis showed that the result was not stable (Liu: OR = 1.33, 95% CI = 0.89–1.98, P = 0.166; Wang: OR = 1.34, 95% CI = 0.89–2.02, P = 0.159; Emamalizadeh: OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 0.90–1.83, P = 0.176). In the dominant genetic model, the sensitivity analysis showed that the result was stable (Liu: OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.02–1.41, P = 0.022; Wang: OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.04–1.44, P = 0.017; Emamalizadeh: OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.10–1.51, P = 0.002; Lin: OR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.14–1.54, P = 0.000). These data implied that our meta-analysis results were not robust in the allelic, recessive, and additive genetic models but remain stable in the dominant genetic model in Asian populations.

Publication bias

Publication bias was assessed by Begg’s test and Egger’s test. A publication bias was found in the dominant genetic model. A trending bias also existed in the recessive and additive models (P = 0.087 and P = 0.070 respectively; Table 5). These data indicate that the number of studies analyzed in the current meta-analysis may be insufficient.

Table 5. Publication bias analysis of the meta-analysis.

  Test t (95% CI) P value
G vs. A Begg’s Test   1.00
Egger’s test −0.24 (−237.14–212.55) 0.836
GG + AG vs. AA Begg’s Test   0.308
Egger’s test 5.39 (1.09–9.74) 0.033
GG vs. AG + AA Begg’s Test   0.308
Egger’s test 3.15 (−5.22–33.91) 0.087
GG vs. AA Begg’s Test   0.734
Egger’s test −3.57 (−155.17–14.53) 0.070

Discussion

RIT2 (formerly named Rin) is a member of the Ras superfamily of small guanosine triphosphate binding proteins localized on the plasma membrane. RIT2 is specifically expressed in neurons, and preferentially expressed in the dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra (SN)15. RIT2 binds to calmodulin 1, a phosphorylase kinase, which binds to the products of SNCA and MAPT, susceptibility genes for PD9. Furthermore, RIT2 directly interacts with the dopamine transporter and mediates its internalization and functional downregulation via the PKC-regulated pathway16. In addition, postmortem examination of PD patients found reduced expression of RIT2 in the SN compared with unaffected controls17. A meta-analysis conducted by Pankratz et al. identified rs12456492 as a novel locus for PD8. In 2014, Nalls et al. performed a large-scale meta-analysis of GWAS data including 13,708 cases and 95,282 controls in a White population. They also identified rs12456492 as a risk locus for PD13. Taken together, these data suggest that RIT2 may play an essential role in the pathogenesis and development of PD. Several replication studies have investigated the association of rs12456492 and PD risk in different populations; however, the results were controversial. Thus, we have conducted this meta-analysis to explore the pooled effect size of the association between rs12456492 and PD susceptibility in Asian populations.

We investigated the four selected studies carefully. Significant association of rs12456492 with PD risk was found in the pooled Asian population in the dominant and additive genetic models. Stratified analysis by MAF showed a significant association of rs12456492 with PD risk in all four genetic models in the subgroup with MAF < 0.5. We performed a meta-regression analysis to investigate the source of heterogeneity, although we failed when considering the publication year and MAF. MAF tended to influence the heterogeneity in the allelic and recessive genetic models (P = 0.094, P = 0.091 respectively), as rs12456492 was significantly associated with PD risk in the two genetic models in MAF < 0.5 subgroup. The sensitivity analysis showed that the association between rs12456492 and PD susceptibility was robust only in the dominant genetic model. However, a publication bias existed in the dominant genetic model, and a trending bias existed in the recessive and additive models. Of the four studies included in the meta-analysis, only Lin et al. did not find a significant association between rs12456492 and PD risk. As a negative result might not be as readily accepted for publication as a positive result, this could be a contributing factor to the publication bias that we found in the rs12456492 investigation. These results indicated that the number of studies included in the meta-analysis was insufficient. Our meta-analysis suggested that although a significant association of rs12456492 with PD risk was found in the pooled population in some of the genetic models, the results should nonetheless be applied cautiously due to the instability caused by the limited number of studies and the sample size.

Differential associations of rs12456492 with PD susceptibility between different MAF groups might be due to the varying genetic backgrounds and sample sizes. Data from the PubMed SNP database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP/snp_ref.cgi?rs=12456492) showed that the frequency of allele G was 0.375 and 0.339 in Chinese and Japanese populations, respectively. In an Asian population, the highest MAF was 0.5. In the four studies included in the current meta-analysis, three of them had a MAF < 0.5, while Lin et al.’s data had a MAF > 0.5. The discrepancy of these results might be due to the genetic heterogeneity between different regions, as Lin et al.’s study included a Taiwanese population, while two other studies included a Chinese population from mainland China. This suggests that the complex etiology of PD is influenced by both hereditary and environmental factors. Moreover, in the study by Lin et al., both late-onset PD (62%) and early-onset PD (38%) patients were recruited, and the early-onset PD patients had an age of onset of less than 50 years. However, the mean ages of onset in the other three studies was greater than that in the study by Lin et al., and age might have influenced the heterogeneity and association. Due to insufficient data, we did not examine the contribution of age to heterogeneity in our meta-regression analysis. Therefore, experimental research and human studies with larger sample sizes, different ethnicity, and rigorous design are needed to further clarify this association.

Some limitations were present in this meta-analysis. First, only studies published in English were included. Second, the stratified analysis was performed only by MAF, without considering other factors. Third, the sample size was small. Fourth, only Asian populations were analyzed in the current meta-analysis, as the associations had been found in White populations8,13. All of these limitations may lead to bias in our results.

In summary, our meta-analysis suggested that rs12456492 was significantly associated with PD in Asian populations. However, additional studies with larger sample sizes, gene-gene and gene-environment interactions in different countries and ethnic populations may be helpful in providing a more reliable estimation of the association between rs12456492 and PD susceptibility.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Lu, Y. et al. Genetic association of RIT2 rs12456492 polymorphism and Parkinson's disease susceptibility in Asian populations: a meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 5, 13805; doi: 10.1038/srep13805 (2015).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Figure S1
srep13805-s1.pdf (8.5KB, pdf)

Footnotes

Author Contributions Y.L. and W.L. performed search, K.T. and J.P. prepared tables, Y.Z. prepared figure, X.W. wrote the manuscript.

References

  1. Kalia L. V. & Lang A. E. Parkinson’s disease. Lancet, 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61393-3 (2015). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Wirdefeldt K., Adami H. O., Cole P., Trichopoulos D. & Mandel J. Epidemiology and etiology of Parkinson’s disease: a review of the evidence. European journal of epidemiology 26 Suppl 1, S1–58, 10.1007/s10654-011-9581-6 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dehay B. et al. Loss of P-type ATPase ATP13A2/PARK9 function induces general lysosomal deficiency and leads to Parkinson disease neurodegeneration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109, 9611–9616, 10.1073/pnas.1112368109 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dhungel N. et al. Parkinson’s disease genes VPS35 and EIF4G1 interact genetically and converge on alpha-synuclein. Neuron 85, 76–87, 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.11.027 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Trinh J. & Farrer M. Advances in the genetics of Parkinson disease. Nature Reviews Neurology 9, 445–454, 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.132 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Edwards T. L. et al. Genome-wide association study confirms SNPs in SNCA and the MAPT region as common risk factors for Parkinson disease. Annals of human genetics 74, 97–109, 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2009.00560.x (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hamza T. H. et al. Common genetic variation in the HLA region is associated with late-onset sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Nature genetics 42, 781–785, 10.1038/ng.642 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pankratz N. et al. Meta-analysis of Parkinson’s disease: identification of a novel locus, RIT2. Annals of neurology 71, 370–384, 10.1002/ana.22687 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Liu Z. H. et al. Assessment of RIT2 rs12456492 association with Parkinson’s disease in Mainland China. Neurobiology of aging 36, 1600 e1609–1600 e1611, 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.12.012 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Emamalizadeh B. et al. RIT2, a susceptibility gene for Parkinson’s disease in Iranian population. Neurobiology of aging 35, e27–28, 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.07.013 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nie K. et al. RIT2 polymorphism is associated with Parkinson’s disease in a Han Chinese population. Neurobiology of aging 36, 1603 e1615-1607, 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.10.013 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lin C. H., Chen M. L., Yu C. Y. & Wu R. M. RIT2 variant is not associated with Parkinson’s disease in a Taiwanese population. Neurobiology of aging 34, 2236 e2231.-2233, 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.04.005 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nalls M. A. et al. Large-scale meta-analysis of genome-wide association data identifies six new risk loci for Parkinson’s disease. Nature genetics 46, 989–993, 10.1038/ng.3043 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang J. Y. et al. The RIT2 and STX1B polymorphisms are associated with Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism & related disorders 21, 300–302, 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2014.12.006 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhou Q., Li J., Wang H., Yin Y. & Zhou J. Identification of nigral dopaminergic neuron-enriched genes in adult rats. Neurobiology of aging 32, 313–326, 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.02.009 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Navaroli D. M. et al. The plasma membrane-associated GTPase Rin interacts with the dopamine transporter and is required for protein kinase C-regulated dopamine transporter trafficking. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 31, 13758–13770, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2649-11.2011 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bossers K. et al. Analysis of gene expression in Parkinson’s disease: possible involvement of neurotrophic support and axon guidance in dopaminergic cell death. Brain pathology 19, 91–107, 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2008.00171.x (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure S1
srep13805-s1.pdf (8.5KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES