Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Photonics. 2015 Sep 1;9(9):608–614. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2015.150

Inverse four-wave-mixing and self-parametric amplification effect in optical fibre

Sergei K Turitsyn 1,2,*, Anastasia E Bednyakova 2,3, Mikhail P Fedoruk 2,3, Serguei B Papernyi 4, Wallace RL Clements 4
PMCID: PMC4558939  EMSID: EMS64184  PMID: 26345290

Abstract

An important group of nonlinear processes in optical fibre involves the mixing of four waves due to the intensity dependence of the refractive index. It is customary to distinguish between nonlinear effects that require external/pumping waves (cross-phase modulation and parametric processes such as four-wave mixing) and self-action of the propagating optical field (self-phase modulation and modulation instability). Here, we present a new nonlinear self-action effect, self-parametric amplification (SPA), which manifests itself as optical spectrum narrowing in normal dispersion fibre, leading to very stable propagation with a distinctive spectral distribution. The narrowing results from an inverse four-wave mixing, resembling an effective parametric amplification of the central part of the spectrum by energy transfer from the spectral tails. SPA and the observed stable nonlinear spectral propagation with random temporal waveform can find applications in optical communications and high power fibre lasers with nonlinear intra-cavity dynamics.

Introduction

Nonlinear fibre optics is a research field at the two-way interface of fundamental nonlinear physics and fibre-optic engineering that encompasses diverse areas of science and technology. Nonlinear effects in optical fibre are critically important for various practical applications ranging from telecommunications to medical fibre lasers (see e.g. [1-6] and references therein). However, nonlinear fibre optics is also a remarkable and versatile test-bed for experimental probing of ideas and concepts of fundamental nonlinear science [5, 7-13]. This, in turn, means that fibre optics is an ideal platform for the invention and development of novel devices based on nonlinear design concepts with functionality not available in linear science engineering. Due to the relatively low threshold for the occurrence of nonlinear effects in fibre, they may adversely impact signal propagation in optical communications, or be positively exploited for the development of all-optical devices for optical networks, fibre lasers, signal processing components and in many other applications.

Typically, fibre nonlinear effects are subdivided into two main categories: phenomena induced by the nonlinearities that arise from scattering (stimulated Brillouin scattering (SBS) and stimulated Raman scattering (SRS)) and the nonlinear effects due to the Kerr effect, the intensity dependence of the refractive index (self-phase modulation (SPM), cross-phase modulation (XPM), four-wave mixing (FWM), modulation instability (MI) and parametric processes based on FWM [2, 4]). The interaction of two or more waves with different frequencies may lead to power transfer between them, according to the corresponding stimulated scattering or parametric processes. A subclass of such phenomena occurs in the degenerate case, when a single wave affects itself through the nonlinear response of the medium. This is called a self-action effect. Although the differentiation between various manifestations of the Kerr nonlinearity is somewhat artificial (as all elementary nonlinear processes resulting from the cubic nonlinearity formally can be treated as a mixing of four waves), from the practical view point, it is convenient to distinguish between nonlinear interactions of the optical field under consideration with external fields (e.g. pumping waves) co-existing from the very outset (for instance, cross-phase modulation and parametric processes) and self-action of the propagating light wave (e.g. self-phase modulation and modulation instability).

In general, optical nonlinear self-action effects may be both spatial (self-focusing, self-phase modulation, spatial modulation instability) and temporal (self-phase modulation, temporal modulation instability). Self-action occurs when a propagating electromagnetic wave induces a refractive index change in the medium. The modified index of refraction in a fibre in turn affects the overall propagating field, producing effective self-action of the wave.

Optical parametric amplification (OPA) in fibres, pioneered by R. Stolen [14], is traditionally considered as a process of energy transfer from pumping wave(s) to a signal wave. Recently, fibre OPA has become a booming area of research with impressive demonstrations of the feasibility of low-noise parametric amplification in high-capacity optical communications [15-22]. These breakthroughs are greatly supported by recent progress in the development of efficient highly-nonlinear fibres with a large ratio of the nonlinear coefficient to the attenuation parameter.

In this work, we introduce a new nonlinear self-action effect in optical fibre, inverse FWM or self-parametric amplification (SPA), which occurs in normal dispersion optical fibres under certain conditions described below. Note that the term “parametric amplification” is employed here in a context different from the standard usage. Traditional parametric amplification is typically defined for monochromatic waves, while here we use this term for the relatively broad spectrum of a multi-longitudinal-mode Raman fibre laser. Moreover, here the term “amplification” means only a re-distribution of the energy due to inverse FWM and is applied only to the central part of the spectrum that is “gaining” power at the expense of the energy decrease in the spectral tails of the field. However, we believe that this terminology helps to explain the underlying elementary processes and physics of the unusual nonlinear process demonstrated. We observed experimentally and confirm through comprehensive numerical modelling that the spectral width of a signal produced by a Raman fibre laser becomes narrower after propagation in a sufficient length of normal dispersion fibre. The resulting state, featuring a narrow spectrum and random temporal field distribution, propagates with remarkable stability, showing potential for applications in fibre lasers and optical communications. We present a basic theory of self-parametric amplification that is confirmed by extensive numerical modelling and experimental observations.

Results

Experimental setup

We start from the description of the experiment that initiated this study. The experimental setup is shown in Fig. 1(a). In the first set of experiments, the Raman fibre laser (RFL) [23] operated at ~1425 nm while, in the set of cross-check experiments presented at the end of the paper, an RFL operating at 1276 nm was used. Both Raman lasers operated in the continuous wave (CW) regime with a maximum output power up to 2W. The outputs were randomly polarized with a degree of polarization < 5%. It is widely known in fibre-optics that nonlinear effects such as four-wave mixing and self-phase modulation typically manifest themselves as a spectrum broadening when relatively high-power CW fields propagate in optical fibres [23-29]. A characteristic feature of the Raman fibre laser, related to high in-resonator power and the resulting in-cavity spectral broadening, is that its output spectrum has two peaks with a separation of 0.2 – 1 nm (Fig. 1b). The double-peaked structure of the output spectrum is the result of the FWM-induced spectral broadening inside the Raman converter cavity which leads to a spectral breadth which exceeds the reflection bandwidth of the fibre Bragg grating (FBG) output coupler and therefore to radiation “overflowing” the FBG reflector [23-29, 33].

Figure 1. Experimental observation of spectrum evolution in normal and anomalous dispersion fibres.

Figure 1

(a) Experimental setup. (b) Initial spectrum and spectrum after propagation in 100 km of LEAF and SMF-28 fibres. The power launched into each fibre was 1.5 W.

The laser radiation generated at 1424.5 nm was launched into the 100-km long LEAF (Large Effective Area Fibre) or SMF-28 (Single Mode Fibre) fibres, with a zero-dispersion wavelength around 1490 nm for LEAF and 1310 nm for SMF-28. Thus, light propagates in the region of normal dispersion for the first and anomalous dispersion for the latter. The spectra at the input and output of the 100-km lengths of fibre were measured with an Optical Spectum Analyzer (OSA) with a resolution of 0.01 nm.

Narrowing of the optical spectra

The measured optical spectrum at the end of LEAF fibre shows significant narrowing (see Fig. 1(b) - LEAF), in sharp contrast to the typical nonlinear spectral broadening in SMF-28 (see Fig. 1(b) - SMF) caused by four-wave mixing which has been observed and studied in a number of experimental and theoretical publications [23, 24, 27-31]. The explanation of this atypical narrowing effect is the aim of our work.

Extensive numerical modelling of light generation in the Raman fibre laser and its further propagation in the LEAF fibre fully confirms the observed unusual spectral behavior of a nonlinear wave in a long fibre with normal dispersion. Signal evolution inside the laser cavity was modelled by the set of coupled modified nonlinear Schrödinger equations taking into account dispersion, Kerr nonlinearity, Raman gain, depletion of the Raman pump wave and fibre losses with all details of modelling presented, e.g. in [2, 32] (see also Methods section below). Signal evolution in the LEAF fibre was computed using the standard nonlinear Schrödinger equation [2].

The results of experiments and numerical simulations presented in Figs. 2 and 3 demonstrate spectral narrowing of CW radiation with simultaneous temporal fluctuations. The initial spectrum is converted to the double-scale distribution (a bell-shaped peak in the centre but with exponentially decaying spectral tails introducing a second scaling parameter in the spectral distribution) at the LEAF output both in experiment and in simulation (Fig. 2). A stable spectrum evolution (after approximately 50 km) along the LEAF fibre is shown in Fig. 3(a). We would like to stress that the observed stabilization of the spectrum is a nontrivial nonlinear process. Intensive numerical modeling shows that this happens both in a fibre span with loss and in the corresponding lossless system. Spatio-temporal dynamics of the signal feature highly irregular intensity fluctuations (Fig. 3(b)). Despite visible irregularities of the temporal field distribution shown in Fig. 3 (b), in the spectral domain, this statistical steady state is very stable and may evolve without major changes over long distances. Due to the fact that multiple modes are involved in building this statistical equilibrium through nonlinear FWM interactions, the process calls for a kinetic description [13, 27]. We believe that this is an interesting and practically important experimental observation of the kinetic equilibrium in optical fibre [8, 10, 12, 13, 27].

Figure 2. Spectrum shape after signal propagation in LEAF fibre.

Figure 2

(a) experiment and (b) simulation. P0(0) = 1.5 W, L = 100 km.

Figure 3. Evolution of the signal spectrum and temporal shape along the fibre.

Figure 3

(a) Computed power spectrum density evolution along the LEAF fibre, demonstrating a transition to very stable propagation with a distinctive asymptotic spectrum. (b) The corresponding spatiotemporal dynamics is shown over an interval of 800 ps. Here the fluctuating CW power P(t, z) is normalized by the distance-dependent factor Pnorm(z) = P(0)exp(αz), where α = 0.25 dB/km is the fibre loss. The two figures illustrate that while the temporal field structure is irregular, the spectrum propagation demonstrates remarkable stability.

We have performed a number of experiments with various fibres at different wavelengths along with extensive numerical modeling and conclude that we were able to observe the effect of nonlinear spectral narrowing only in the case of normal fibre dispersion (see Supplementary Note 1).

Qualitative analysis

First, let us try to explain qualitatively the physical mechanism underlying the spectral narrowing of a high-power field containing many longitudinal modes in normal dispersion fibre. The key idea came from the observation that the Raman laser output (with its double-peaked spectrum) being launched into the LEAF fibre resembles a 2-pump optical parametric amplifier with two spectrally separated pumps. Of course, there are no separate “pumps” and “signal” in this case; instead, the input field self-acts in re-distributing energy from the peripheral wavelengths - “pumps” to the central region - “signal”. This is obviously only a qualitative picture that helps in understanding the main elementary mechanism of such self-pumping of the central wavelength region at the expense of the tails. Consider those effective “pumps” to be at frequencies ω1 and ω2 at the fibre input. Such effective “pumps” would amplify “signal” and “idler” with frequencies ω3 and ω4, respectively. Consider, ω1 < ω2 and ω3 < ω4. Evidently, here “signal” and “idler” represent just two spectral components of the same wave-packet that through FWM get energy from the tails of the spectrum (“pumps”). Notice that ω3 and ω4 are symmetric with respect to the center frequency ωc = (ω1 + ω2) / 2 = (ω3 + ω4) / 2, which is halfway between the two pump frequencies. As a matter of fact, the self-parametric amplification effect does not require a two-pump structure of the input field; similar spectral narrowing can be observed for input waves having a bell-shaped spectrum. This was conclusively confirmed by additional experiments and modeling (see discussion below). The particular example considered here is very useful for understanding the underlying principle, i.e. the two spectral peaks in the Raman laser output could be associated with the “pumps”, whereas the spectral narrowing of the laser output as it propagates in the normal dispersion fibre could be associated with the “signal” and “idler” (or just “signal” if ω3 = ω4) amplification in an effective fibre OPA.

In this qualitative analysis, consider first the un-depleted pump case when signal and idler are small compared to the pumps P3 = P0 = P1 + P2 (for simplicity, as the analysis in this section is only qualitative, formulae here are given for the case when the idler is absent at z=0). The unsaturated single pass gain for signal G3 may be written as [15, 17]:

G3=P3(L)P3(0)=1+[γP0gsinh(gL)]2, (1)

with the idler gain being G4 = G3 − 1. Here, g is a parametric gain coefficient given by g2 = r2 − (k / 2)2, r = γ P0, γ is nonlinearity coefficient. The gain coefficient reaches its maximum value when k = Δβ + ΔβNL = 0, where k is the total propagation constant, Δβ = β(ω3) + β(ω4) + β(ω1) − β(ω2) is the propagation constant wave vector mismatch and ΔβNL = γ P0 is the nonlinear contribution to the wavevector mismatch. The corresponding single pass signal gain is equal to:

G3,max=1+[sinh(γP0L)]2, (2)

and for the idler:

G4,max=[sinh(γP0L)]2.

It is convenient to introduce the following notations: Δωs = ω3ωc, Δωp = ω1ωc = ωcω2. To understand the effect of dispersion, we can expand the propagation constant mismatch in a standard power series in terms of ωs and ωp [15, 17]: Δβ=2m=1β2m(2m)![Δωs2mΔωp2m], where β2m are even derivatives of β(ω) at ωc. Consider only the main term in this expansion assuming that β4 << β2, i.e. Δββ2[(Δωs2)(Δωp2)]. The shape of the gain spectrum and location of the gain maximum in the spectral domain are given by the condition of phase matching:

k=0[Δωs2Δωp2]=γP0β2 (3)

Equation (3) provides a reasonable qualitative explanation of why the sign of the dispersion does matter in the considered experiment: when fibre dispersion is normal β2 > 0, the gain maximum is located between the pumps, Δωs < Δωp. On the other hand, when fibre dispersion is anomalous β2 < 0, the gain maximum is located outside the area between the pumps, in the frequency domain Δωs > Δωp as illustrated by Fig. 4(a). Figure 4(a) depicts the signal parametric gain G3[dB] as a function of distance Δλ between the pumps and signal wavelength. Black lines show the wavelengths of the pumps. As one can see, in the normal dispersion regime, the gain spectrum is bell-shaped with the maximum amplification in its central part. When dispersion is anomalous, symmetric gain maxima are always located outside the area between the pumps, which effectively leads to significant spectrum broadening.

Figure 4. Signal gain spectra as a function of pumps wavelengths spacing.

Figure 4

(a) 4-wave model, P0(0) = 1.5 W, L = 1 km. The unsaturated single pass gain for signal G3 is shown. Black lines show the corresponding wavelengths of the pumps. (b) NLSE model, P0(0) = 1.5 W, P3(0) = 300 mW, P4(0) = 0, L = 1 km. The projection at the top is related to the normal dispersion case: black solid line – deterministic phases of waves; grey circles – averaging over 600 sets of random phases.

Note that, for a central frequency gain, when signal coincides with idler Δωs = 0 , we deal with degenerate OPA and signal amplification should be considered in the framework of the degenerate OPA model. The qualitative analysis presented in this section explains the difference between normal and anomalous dispersion propagation regimes. However, this simple model does not take into account pump depletion and the generation of additional waves through FWM. This changes the quantitative characteristics of the SPA process and requires a more accurate analysis that is presented in the following section.

Gain analysis in the nonlinear Schrödinger equation model

Certainly, the 4-wave model above gives only a qualitative picture; many other frequency components are generated and interact with each other due to four-wave mixing in the process under consideration. Some of these waves may be well phase-matched and so may reach levels comparable with the “signal”. To give a more realistic evaluation of the self-parametric amplification, we now use the nonlinear Schrödinger equation (NLSE) to obtain the signal amplification spectrum in the presence of parasitic FWM components depleting the effective gain. Figure 4(b) shows the signal gain spectrum corresponding to the two-pump fibre OPA with varying distance between the pumps. Here the total pump power is 1.5 W, the signal CW power at the fibre input equals to 300 mW and the idler is absent at z = 0. The gain spectrum is still bell-shaped if the distance between the pumps is properly chosen (see Fig. 4(b), inset) and maximum amplification is achieved in the frequency band between the pumps.

Note that previously we considered an ideal case - a phase-insensitive parametric amplifier. The real laser output has the form of a multimode light field without phase locking; thus, self-parametric amplification of such a field is phase-sensitive. To study the impact of the effect of random initial phases, we have performed additional simulations. We considered signal and idler with equal powers (300 mW total power) at the fibre input and the relative phase difference between the four involved light waves at the fibre input θ(0) = φ3(0) + φ4(0)−φ1(0)−φ2(0) was assumed to be a random value with a uniform probability distribution bounded between −π and π. Statistical analysis was done with 600 different sets of the random phases. A statistical signal gain spectrum averaged over the 600 sets is shown by dashed line grey circles in Fig. 4 right top. It has a characteristic high peak at the central frequency similar to the simplified 4-wave model.

Although we have shown that the maximum signal amplification can be achieved near the central frequency, new spectral components still could be amplified simultaneously with the signal and lead to the broadening of the laser spectrum. To investigate pump energy transfer along the fibre, we consider signal amplification at the central frequency (signal coincides with idler ωc = ω3 = ω4). To estimate a value of the FWM product during the signal amplification, we introduce the dimensionless function F(Δλ,θ (0)) , defined as the ratio between pump energy transferred to signal at the frequency ω = ω3 and pump energy transferred to other frequencies due to FWM: F = ΔPs / PFWM, where ΔPs = P3(L)−P3(0) and PFWM = P0(0) + Ps(0)−Pp(L)−Ps(L). F(Δλ,θ (0)) is a figure of merit indicating how effectively pump energy transfers to signal, i.e. efficiency of signal amplification. F=0 corresponds to G3 =0, i.e. no amplification for the ω3 signal, whereas F tends to infinity when the only spectral component amplified is the ω3 signal.

Figure 5 shows value of the signal gain G = 10 log10 (Ps(L) / Ps(0)) and dimensionless function F (bottom row) in the plane of parameters Δλ−θ(0). It can be seen, the FWM product can be neglected if the spectral distance between the pumps is properly chosen (undesirable FWM product is minimized and all the pump energy transfers to the signal).

Figure 5. Estimate of the FWM product during the signal amplification.

Figure 5

(Top) Dependence of the signal gain G[dB] on relative phase difference θ(0) and wavelength spacing between two pumps Δλ. (Bottom) Dependence of the function F = ΔPs / PFWM on relative phase difference θ(0) and wavelength spacing between two pumps Δλ.

Discussion

An interesting question is: what are the conditions for spectral compression and broadening in normal dispersion fibre? In Figure 6 we considered the broadening factor Δλout / Δλin as a function of: initial spectral width, power, fibre dispersion and cavity length. Figure 6(a) depicts the evolution of the broadening factor Δλout / Δλin with an initial spectrum width Δλin in numerical simulations. When the spectrum width at z = 0 is less than 0.4 nm, we still observe spectrum broadening in a 100-km long fibre. However, if Δλin exceeds 0.4 nm, spectrum narrowing takes place. We verified that this effect is observed both in lossy and lossless cases (see details in Supplementary Note 2). We also studied the impact of dispersion (Supplementary Note 3) and statistics of the compressing signal (Supplementary Note 4). In Figs. 6(b)-(e) we consider in more detail two different points along the line, corresponding to spectrum broadening and narrowing (marked as “1” and “2” in Fig. 6(a)). For Δλin = 0.25 nm, the broadening factor first monotonically increases with the fibre length L as long as it is shorter than 5 km (Fig. 6(d)). With further increase of propagation distance, the initial rise is followed by a decrease. This kind of evolution of a multimode CW field was previously observed in [31]. Scaling of Ld / LNL along the propagation distance is shown in Figure 6(e). Spectral broadening occurs when the dispersion length at the fibre input is much greater than the nonlinear length. On the other hand, when dispersion length becomes comparable with the nonlinear length, we observe nonlinear spectral narrowing. The observed nonlinear spectral broadening depends on the ratio of the dispersive and nonlinear lengths Ld / LNL. Therefore, light with a broader bandwidth can be also compressed provided that after rescaling of parameters the factor Ld / LNL is the same as in the studied examples.

Figure 6. Theoretical evolution of the spectral broadening factor.

Figure 6

Dependence of the broadening factor Δλout / Δλin on (a) initial spectrum width Δλin after 100 km of LEAF, P0 = 1.5 W, lossless fibre. (Inset) Spectrum shapes before and after signal propagation in 100 km of LEAF, corresponding to the points marked “1” and “2”; (b) pump power, corresponding to the points marked “1” and “2”, L = 100 km; (c) group delay dispersion, corresponding to the points marked “1” and “2”, L = 100 km, P0 = 1.5 W; (d) fibre length, corresponding to the points marked “1” and “2”, P0 = 1.5 W. (e) Scaling of Ld / LNL along the propagation distance, P0 = 1.5 W. (f,g) Experimentally measured input and output spectra of 1276-nm light propagating in 100 km of SMF-28 vs. input power (f) P0 = 0.7 W, (g) P0 = 1.3 W.

We additionally experimentally verified that the RFL spectrum is also narrowing when transmitted through other fibres with normal dispersion, as shown in Fig. 6(f,g). The laser radiation generated at 1276 nm was launched into the same 100-km length of SMF-28 which has normal dispersion at this wavelength (β2 = 3.1 ps2/km, γ =1.8 W−1km−1). We observed spectral narrowing both in experiment and simulation. In the experiment, a narrow and low power (0.7 W) RFL spectrum becomes broader after propagation in SMF (Fig. 6(f)); however, when initial width and power increases (1.3 W), one can see compression (Fig. 6(g)) and formation of a stable spectrum.

The remarkable spectral stability of the evolved state (in normal dispersion fibre) despite a random temporal behaviour indicates that we observe an asymptotic kinetic regime that resulted from the optical wave turbulence of a multitude of elementary waves in the nonlinear system considered [8, 10, 12, 13, 35]. It is also worth pointing out that this surprising finding that the evolved spectral distribution does not change appreciably with propagation may potentially be exploited in fibre lasers and optical telecommunications. In fibre lasers, nonlinear compression may lead to increased spectral brightness compared to systems using direct spectral filtering, avoiding additional losses inevitable with filters. In optical communications, spectrally stable nonlinear propagation regimes may lead to new techniques of mitigation of nonlinear transmission impairments that are a major challenge in modern high-capacity systems.

Conclusion

We have presented a new self-action effect that may occur during high-power wave propagation in normal dispersion fibre - self-parametric amplification or inverse four-wave mixing that manifests itself as a spectral compression of light. This is different from compression of pre-chirped coherent pulses [36-41]. Observed effect is the result of a nonlinear energy re-distribution from the tails of signal spectrum to the central region. This can be considered as an effective self-parametric amplification of the central part of the wave packet spectrum by the peripheral “pumps”. The simple theory of self-parametric amplification presented explains all the key features observed in the experiments and full numerical modelling. We believe that the remarkable stability of the observed spectral field distribution may offer new interesting applications in high power fibre lasers and optical telecommunications.

Methods

Propagation in LEAF

Signal propagation down the LEAF fibre has been modelled using the NLS equation with losses [2]:

Az=iβ222At2+iγA2Aα2A, (M1)

where A(z, t) is the electric field envelope, β2 is the second-order dispersion coefficient at the central frequency ω0, γ = n2ω0/(cAeff) is the Kerr nonlinearity coefficient with the nonlinear refractive index n2 and effective fibre cross-section area Aeff for the fundamental mode and α is the fibre attenuation coefficient. The equation has been solved using the split-step Fourier transform method. The following fibre parameters are used in the simulations: β2 = 4.3 ps2/km, γ =2.16 W−1km−1, α =0.25 dB/km.

Raman fibre laser

To model the laser generation, we use a NLSE-based model previously reported to be efficient for modeling of RFLs [32]:

Ap±z=i2β2p2Ap±t2+iγp[Ap±2+(2fR)As±2]Ap±gp2(As+2+As2)Ap±αp2Ap±As±z=(1vs1vp)As±ti2β2s2Ap±t2+iγs[As±2+(2fR)Ap±2]Ap±+gs2(Ap+2+Ap2)As±αs2As± (M2)

The boundary conditions describe the pump input and the reflection of the optical field from the fibre Bragg gratings:

Ap+(0,t)=Ain,Ap(L,ω)=Rp(ω)Ap+(L,ω)As+(0,ω)=Rin(ω)As(0,ω),As(L,ω)=Rout(ω)As+(L,ω)

where Rin(ω) and Rout,p(ω) are the reflectivities (with respect to power) at the left and right cavity ends, respectively.

The model describes spectral broadening during one round trip and the building of a steady state over many round trips. We integrated equations (M2) along z using the split-step Fourier transform method and an iterative procedure similar to that used for modeling of Brillouin fibre lasers [34]. For example, to integrate the equation for As,p±(z,t), we substituted into the equation As,p(z,t) obtained on a previous iteration and so on. The generation becomes stable after 102–104 round trips, depending on the power.

Supplementary Material

1

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge financial support from ERC project ULTRALASER (267763); Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (14.B25.31.0003 and 14.578.21.0029); the Russian Science Foundation (14-21-00110) (work of A.E.B). The authors also thank Dr. E. V. Podivilov for fruitful discussions.

Footnotes

Competing financial interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

References

  • 1.Stolen RH. The early years of fiber nonlinear optics. J. Lightwave Technol. 2008;26:1021–1031. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Agrawal GP. Nonlinear Fiber Optics. Oxford, UK: 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Boyd RW. Nonlinear Optics. Academic Press; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Toulouse J. Optical nonlinearities in fibers: Review, recent examples, systems applications. J. Lightwave Technol. 2005;23:3625–3641. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dudley JM, Taylor JR. Ten years of nonlinear optics in photonic crystal fibre. Nature Photon. 2009;3:85–90. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Garmire E. Nonlinear optics in daily life. Opt. Express. 2013;21:30532–30544. doi: 10.1364/OE.21.030532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Solli DR, Ropers C, Koonath P, Jalali B. Optical rogue waves. Nature. 2007;450:1054–1057. doi: 10.1038/nature06402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Turitsyna EG, et al. The laminar-turbulent transition in a fibre laser. Nature Photon. 2013;7:783–786. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kibler B, et al. The Peregrine soliton in nonlinear fibre optics. Nature Phys. 2010;6:790–795. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Turitsyn SK, et al. Random distributed feedback fibre laser. Nature Photon. 2010;4:231–235. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Turitsyn SK, Bale B, Fedoruk MP. Dispersion-managed solitons in fibre systems and lasers. Phys. Rep. 2012;521:135–203. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Turitsyn SK, et al. Random distributed feedback fibre lasers. Phys. Rep. 2014;542:133–193. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Picozzi A, et al. Optical wave turbulence: Toward a unified nonequilibrium thermodynamic formulation of statistical nonlinear optics. Phys. Rep. 2014;542:1–132. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Stolen RH. Phase-matched-stimulated four-photon mixing in silica-fiber waveguides. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 1975;11:100–103. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Marhic ME. Fiber Optical Parametric Amplifiers, Oscillators and Related Devices. Cambridge University Press; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hansryd J, Andrekson PA, Westlund M, Li J, Hedekvist PO. Fiber-based optical parametric amplifiers and their applications. J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2002;8:506–520. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Radic S, McKinstrie CJ. Two-pump fiber parametric amplifiers. Opt. Fiber Technol. 2003;9:7–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.McKinstrie C, Radic S. Phase-sensitive amplification in a fiber. Opt. Express. 2004;12:4973–4979. doi: 10.1364/opex.12.004973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.McKinstrie CJ, Radic S, Gnauck AH. All-optical signal processing by fiber-based parametric devices. Opt. Photonics News. 2007;18:34–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Marhic ME, et al. Fiber optical parametric amplifiers in optical communication systems. Laser & Photon. Rev. 2015;9:50–74. doi: 10.1002/lpor.201400087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tong Z, et al. Towards ultrasensitive optical links enabled by low-noise phase-sensitive amplifiers. Nature Photon. 2011;5:430–436. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Slavik R, et al. All-optical phase and amplitude regenerator for next-generation telecommunications systems. Nature Photon. 2010;4:690–695. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Karpov VI, Clements WRL, Dianov EM, Papernyi SB. High-power 1.48 micrometer phosphoro-silicate-fiber-based laser pumped by laser diodes. Canadian Journal of Physics. 2000;78:407–413. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bouteiller J-C. Spectral modeling of Raman fiber lasers. PTL. 2003;15:1698–1700. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Suret P, Randoux S. Influence of spectral broadening on steady characteristics of Raman fiber lasers: from experiments to questions about the validity of usual models. Opt. Commun. 2004;237:201–212. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Turitsyn SK, et al. Modeling of CW Yb-doped fiber lasers with highly nonlinear cavity dynamics. Opt. Express. 2011;19:8394–8405. doi: 10.1364/OE.19.008394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Babin S, Churkin D, Ismagulov A, Kablukov S, Podivilov E. Four-wave-mixing-induced turbulent spectral broadening in a long Raman fiber laser. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B. 2007;24:1729–1738. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Turitsyn SK, et al. Optical wave turbulence. In: Shrira V, Nazarenko S, editors. World Scientific Series on Nonlinear Science Series A: Volume 83, Advances in Wave Turbulence. World Scientific; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Babin S, et al. Turbulent broadening of optical spectra in ultralong Raman fiber lasers. Phys. Rev. A. 2008;77:033803. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Turitsyna EG, Falkovich G, Mezentsev VK, Turitsyn SK. Optical turbulence and spectral condensate in long-fiber lasers. Phys. Rev. A. 2009;80:031804. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2012.0037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Barviau B, Randoux S, Suret P. Spectral broadening of a multimode continuous-wave optical field propagating in the normal dispersion regime of a fiber. Opt. Lett. 2006;31:1696–1698. doi: 10.1364/ol.31.001696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Churkin D, Smirnov S, Podivilov E. Statistical properties of partially coherent cw fiber lasers. Opt. Lett. 2010;35:3288–3290. doi: 10.1364/OL.35.003288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Paramonov VM, Kurkov AS, Medvedkov OI, Grukh DA, Dianov EM. Two-frequency fibre Raman laser. Quantum Electron. 2004;34:213–215. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Preda CE, Fotiadi AA, Mégret P. Numerical approximation for Brillouin fiber ring resonator. Optics Express. 2012;20:5783–5788. doi: 10.1364/OE.20.005783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Churkin DV, et al. Wave kinetics of random fibre lasers. Nature Communications. 2015;6:6214. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sidorov-Biryukov DA, et al. Spectral narrowing of chirp-free light pulses in anomalously dispersive, highly nonlinear photonic-crystal fibers. Opt. Express. 2008;16:2502–2507. doi: 10.1364/oe.16.002502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Cundiff ST, et al. Propagation of Highly Chirped Pulses in Fiber-Optic Communications Systems. J. Lightwave Technol. 1999;17:811–816. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Washburn BR, Buck JA, Ralph SE. Transform-limited spectral compression due to self-phase modulation in fibers. Opt. Lett. 2000;25:445–447. doi: 10.1364/ol.25.000445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Planas SA, Pires Mansur NL, Brito Cruz CH, Fragnito HL. Spectral narrowing in the propagation of chirped pulses in single-mode fibers. Opt. Lett. 1993;18:699–701. doi: 10.1364/ol.18.000699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Oberthaler M, Höpfel RA. Spectral narrowing of ultrashort laser pulses by self-phase modulation in optical fibers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1993;63(8):1017–1019. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Nishizawa N, Takahashi K, Ozeki Y, Itoh K. Wideband spectral compression of wavelength-tunable ultrashort soliton pulse using comb-profile fiber. Opt. Express. 2010;18:11700–11706. doi: 10.1364/OE.18.011700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES