Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2015 Sep 3;10(9):e0137931. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137931

Correction: Four Genotyping Schemes for Phylogenetic Analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Comparison of Their Congruence with Multi-Locus Sequence Typing

The PLOS ONE Staff
PMCID: PMC4559474  PMID: 26335007

Tables 1 and 2 are incorrectly switched. The table that appears as Table 1 should be Table 2, and the table that appears as Table 2 should be Table 1. The table titles appear in the correct order. Please see the correct Tables 1 and 2 here. The publisher apologizes for these errors.

Table 1. Number of genotypes, clonal complexes and singletons retrieved from the four genotyping schemes.

Typing methods MLST MLVA PFGE DiversiLab
Genotypes/types 67 STs 85 MTs 90 PFGE-types 61 DL-types
Clonal complexes/clonal groups 11 11 20 25
Singletons/unique patterns 39 49 70 36

Table 2. Simpson's index of diversity of the different typing methods.

Typing methods No. of types SID 95% CI
PFGE 90 0.989 (0.984–0.995)
MLVA 85 0.980 (0.970–0.991)
DL (cut-off 95%) 61 0.961 (0.946–0.977)
DL (cut-off 93%) 46 0.937 (0.915–0.958)
MLST 67 0.906 (0.860–0.951)

Reference

  • 1. Maâtallah M, Bakhrouf A, Habeeb MA, Turlej-Rogacka A, Iversen A, Pourcel C, et al. (2013) Four Genotyping Schemes for Phylogenetic Analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Comparison of Their Congruence with Multi-Locus Sequence Typing. PLoS ONE 8(12): e82069 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0082069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES