Abstract
Large parts of African and American countries are colonized by Mansonella, a very common but poorly described filarial nematode. Bloodsucking flies of the genus Culicoides are suspected to be the vector of Mansonella perstans, but no study in Senegal has confirmed that Culicoides can transmit the parasite. Designed specific real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) can be used to identify microfilaria in stained blood smears. This study was performed in July and December 2010 in the southeastern Senegal, which is known to be endemic for M. perstans. We analyzed 297 blood smears from febrile and afebrile resident people by qPCR. The global prevalence of M. perstans was approximately 14.5% in both febrile and afebrile individuals. The age group of > 30 years had the highest prevalence (22.0%). No Culicoides among 1,159 studied specimens was positive for M. perstans and its vector in Senegal still requires identification.
Introduction
Mansonella perstans is a human filarial nematode that is highly prevalent in some areas across sub-Saharan Africa and South America.1,2 The prevalence of this nematode is often very high in endemic areas, even in children, and increases with age. Four species of filariasis-causing nematodes belonging to the genus Mansonella are responsible for human mansonellosis, M. perstans, M. streptocerca, M. ozzardi, and M. rodhaini,3,4 three of which have been described in Africa. M. perstans is considered to be the most frequent in Africa and is endemic in a large portion of sub-Saharan Africa, from Senegal to Uganda and south to Zimbabwe, as well as in South America.1 Overall, more than 100 million people may be infected, and approximately 600 million people lived in the 33 countries are at high risk for M. perstans infection in Africa alone.1
Adult nematodes are 35–80 mm long, live in the body cavities including pericardium, mesentery, and perirenal and retroperitoneal connective tissues of humans.5 The microfilariae are nonperiodic and circulate in the blood in equal amounts throughout the day and night. They can also often be found in salivary gland abscesses,6 an intraocular position,7 and the conjunctiva.8 A vaginal localization was also reported by Bamba in 2012 in Burkina Fasso.9 The longevity of adult M. perstans worms in humans is unknown, but the microfilariae persist for approximately 4 months.10 M. perstans is currently considered to be of little pathogenicity and almost always asymptomatic. This might be partially explained by a modulated immune response because of repeated exposure to the parasite, as was previously shown for loaiasis.11 No studies showing statistically proved association of M. perstans infection with clinical symptoms have been performed to date, M. perstans could be the cause of hypereosinophilia in infected expatriates.12 The reservoir of M. perstans is humans, and transmission appears to occur through the bite of bloodsucking Culicoides flies, which are abundant in tropical ecosystems. Research on M. perstans vectors has allowed Sharp13 to identify Culicoides grahami as a potential vector. Because studies performed in Cameroon have described C. grahami, C. austeni, and C. ornatipennis as potential vectors,14–16 additional studies were performed in different countries to search for vectors of this parasite in endemic areas, including Rhodesia,17 Congo,18 and Nigeria.19 In east Africa, Khamala and Kettle20 studied the taxonomy of Culicoides, identifying 61 species that had no local role in the transmission of M. perstans. Despite the prevalence reported by Pfister in 195421 and Hocquet and others in 1964,22 no preliminary study has been conducted to identify the vector of M. perstans in Senegal, west Africa.
The goal of this retrospective study was to evaluate the prevalence of this neglected parasite in a rural area of Senegal and to lay a foundation for future studies on the documentation of symptoms related to M. perstans infection.
Materials and Methods
Study site.
The Bandafassi study area is located in the region of Kedougou, eastern Senegal, near the border between Senegal, Mali, and Guinea. It belongs to the Sudano–Guinean savannah ecological zone. The region is disadvantaged in comparison with average rural areas in Senegal because it is far away from the capital, Dakar (700 km), and it is the country's most poorly equipped region in terms of health infrastructure and programs. The local roads are bad, often impracticable during the rainy season, which lasts half of the year. The entire population is rural, with farming, including cereal crops (sorghum, maize, and rice), peanuts, and cotton, as the main activity. The water is drawn from collective wells and there is no electricity. The majority of dwellings are huts covered with thatched roofs and most of the compounds have no toilet facilities. There is one public health post within the area, located in the village of Banadafassi, managed by a public nurse. The closest hospital is at Tambacounda (250 km from the area).
Before the beginning of these studies, all participants, including parents or legal guardians of all children, provided written, individual informed consent. The national ethics committee of Senegal approved the project (program of identification of emergent pathogens—No. 00.87 MSP/DS/CNERS, June 2, 2010; malaria in school children—0000-91/MSP/DS/CNERS, June 3, 2010).
Blood specimen collection and examination.
We conducted interviews and sampling in July and December 2010 in rural Senegalese villages in the Kedougou region. The villages were included in a longitudinal prospective study to investigate malaria in school children in Senegal, including epidemiological risk, burden of disease, and control strategies, and a program for the identification of emergent pathogens. Medical examination and blood smear were performed for each child (school children) who had a fever > 37.5°C. For the second program (MALEMAF), 200 μL capillary blood was collected and combined with anticoagulant for molecular examination.23 For each study, a specific designed questionnaire was completed. To determine the prevalence in healthy children, a transversal sampling was performed. Blood smears were stained with Giemsa and analyzed by microscopy to identify malarial trophozoites and gametocytes and the presence of microfilaria.5,24
On each slide, 200 oil-immersion fields (∼0.5 μL blood) were examined, and the filarial:leukocyte ratio was measured.25,26
Arthropod collection.
Insects were collected using a modified CDC light trap (BioQuip Products, Compton, CA), as previously reported.27 In brief, the tulle net pockets were replaced with pockets of Terylene cloth, which traps tiny insects. The arthropods were collected in nine villages of Kedougou in April 2013 and April 2014. The traps were placed in different habitats, resulting in important variations in their qualitative and quantitative performance. In each habitat, we placed two traps, one inside a room occupied by a sleeper to capture endophilic Culicoides spp. and another outside to catch exophilic Culicoides spp.
Morphological identification.
Using a stereomicroscope, Culicoides spp. were separated from other insects and sorted into the following groups based on wing morphology: schultzei, imicola, magnus, milnei, and other Culicoides.28,29 Species identification was achieved by microscopic analyses of wing patterns and observation of different body parts (head, legs, and wing).28–30 After identification, the insects were stored individually at −80°C for further analysis.
Molecular identification.
For molecular identification, blood smears were scratched, and DNA was extracted using a modified 2.0% cetyl-trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) method, as described previously.31 Before extraction, samples were digested with proteinase K at +56°C for 1 hour. The final elution volume of DNA was 200 μL. The quality of the samples was controlled using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) targeting the human β-actin gene, as described previously.32
DNA from Culicoides spp. was extracted as follows: body parts of midges were ground in 180 μL 2.0% CTAB and 20 μL proteinase K (activity equal to 600 mAU/mL solution or 40 mAU/mg of protein). The ground material was lysed by heating in a water bath at 56°C for 1 hour. Two hundred microliters of chloroform was added to the lysed material and the supernatant was recovered after centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 5 minutes. The nucleic acids were precipitated with 200 μL isopropanol after 15 minutes of centrifugation at 12,000 rpm. The pellet was washed with 200 μL of 70.0% ethanol and centrifuged under the above condition for 5 minutes to remove the residual salt. Finally, the pellet was dried in a Speed Vac (Thermo Scientific, Courtaboeuf, France) for 3–4 minutes, and the DNA was dissolved in 100 μL elution buffer Tris-EDTA (TE) and stored at 4°C until further use.
We designed two new sets of primers and Taqman® probes (Life Technologies, St. Aubin, France) based on an alignment of the internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1, 18S-5.8S) of Mansonella spp., primarily M. perstans (5 sequences) and M. ozzardi (3 sequences), as well as Wuchereria bancrofti ITS1. Previously, only standard PCR developed by Keiser and others in 2008 and based on the internal transcribed spacer was proposed for identification of M. perstans.33 The first set was designed to be specific for the genus Mansonella and consists of a forward primer, 5′-CCTGCGGAAGGATCATTAAC-3′, a reverse primer, 5′-ATCGACGGTTTAGGCGATAA-3′, and a probe, 6-FAM-CGGTGATATTCGTTGGTGTCT-TAMRA. The second in silico set is specific for M. perstans, with a forward primer, 5′-AGGATCATTAACGAGCTTCC-3′, a reverse primer, 5′-CGAATATCACCGTTAATTCAGT-3′, and a probe, 6-FAM-TTCACTTTTATTTAGCAACATGCA-TAMRA. After qPCR validation, all samples were tested first with qPCR specific for Mansonella spp., and the positive samples were tested for M. perstans.
Molecular analysis of Mansonella-positive samples was performed using the primers which amplify 485 bp portion of ITS. The PCR consisted of DNA purification at 50°C for 2 minutes and an initial heating phase at 95°C for 15 seconds, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation (95°C for 10 seconds) and annealing (60°C for 45 seconds). A negative control was used to detect possible contamination and a positive control was used to ensure that the amplification conditions were appropriate. All amplifications in real-time PCR (qPCR) were performed in a total reaction volume of 20 μL containing 10 μL master mix Takyon® (Eurogentec France, Angers, France), 1 μL of each primer, 1 μL probe, 2 μL distilled water, and 5.0 μL DNA template. We performed all PCR reactions using the thermal cycler CFX96 Touch detection system (Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France).
The specificity of the PCR qPCR was tested with 100 blood samples collected from febrile French residents hospitalized at La Timone Hospital (Marseille, France) who had not visited an endemic zone for Mansonella.
PCR validation.
To validate the PCR, qPCR we scratched and tested 54 blood smears from Senegal: five samples with microscopically identified M. perstans filariae (only these five slides were reported to be Mansonella positive during the routine examination in the malaria in schoolchildren research program) and 49 microscopically negative specimens collected from the malaria in-school program performed in Kedougou. The examination of the blood smears was performed by microscopy (×100 with immersion oil). The DNA extracted from the blood samples of 100 febrile French residents without blood Mansonella microfilariae and without a history of travel in endemic areas all tested negative. A comparison of the microscopy and PCR gave following results: five samples were positive by microscopy and PCR, no sample was positive by microscopy and negative by PCR, three samples were positive by PCR and negative by microscopy, and 46 samples were negative by both tests.
In brief, the sensitivity of the proposed qPCR compared with the microscopic examination was 100%, as we could detect all positive samples. Moreover, three samples for which we detected the presence of Mansonella genes by qPCR did not reveal microfilariae during microscopic examination, suggesting the higher sensitivity of the qPCR technique. The sensitivity of blood smear microscopy for the diagnostics of mansonellosis was only 63% compared with qPCR. The specificity of the proposed method is also very high: none of the febrile patients from non-endemic regions produced positive results. In total, both techniques were concordant.
We sequenced the 485 bp-bp portion of ITS from 10 randomly selected patients, including three samples negative by microscopy. All sequences were identical among each other and to M. perstans ITS seqeunces deposited in GenBank (KJ631373 and others).
Statistical analysis.
The data were analyzed using Epi Info software, version 7.0.8.0 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA). Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.
Results
Entomological examination.
A total of 1,159 Culicoides spp. were captured (509 in 2013 and 650 in 2014), the majority of which were females. We caught the most midges in the villages of Laminia and Banding, representing 66.2% (767/1,159) of the captures. After microscopic identification, we identified 10 species of Culicoides. C. enderleini and C. oxystoma were the most prevalent, representing approximately 34.1% (395/1,159) and 15.0% (174/1,159), respectively, of the captured species. C. enderleini was well distributed in the study area, whereas C. oxystoma was localized in Laminia and Samekouta, the two villages closest to each other (Figure 1 ). The details of the Culicoides spp. captured during the study are presented in Table 1.
Figure 1.
Study site in Senegal, with the prevalence of Mansonella perstans among the population in parentheses when available.
Table 1.
Biting midges diversity in the Kedougou region
| Bandafassi | Banding | Bundukundi | Ibel | Indar | Thiabedji | Nathia | Samékouta | Laminia | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Culicoides distinctipennis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| C. enderleini | 12 | 116 | 1 | 35 | 2 | 140 | 20 | 12 | 57 | 395 |
| C. fulvithorax | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 |
| C. imicola | 2 | 26 | 40 | 14 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 12 | 13 | 119 |
| C. kingi | 0 | 4 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 4 | 33 | 64 |
| C. leucostictus | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| C. oxystoma | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 170 | 174 |
| C. schultzei spp. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| C. simulis | 0 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 |
| Culicoides sp. (group distinctypennis) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 13 |
| Culicoides sp. (group similis) | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 11 |
| Culicoides spp. | 1 | 115 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 134 |
| C. subschultzei | 0 | 71 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 83 | 159 |
| Alluaudomya spp. | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 |
| Forcipomyia spp. | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| NI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 36 |
| Total | 16 | 369 | 55 | 71 | 11 | 140 | 60 | 39 | 398 | 1,159 |
NI = none identified.
Using PCR, we found that none of the 1,129 Culicoides tested positive for Mansonella. All positive and negative controls gave proper results.
Analysis of blood specimens.
A total of 297 blood smears were analyzed by PCR: 201 from febrile people (febrile people series) who requested care in health posts in the study areas and 96 from blindly selected healthy children (afebrile population series). The sex ratio (male/female) was 50%, and the age group was from 7 months to 45 years. We identified M. perstans in 29 specimens from the febrile people series; this represents a prevalence of 14.4% (29/201). In the afebrile population series, we identified 14 positive representing 15.0% (14/96). The global prevalence of M. perstans in this area was about 14.5% (43/297).
M. perstans is widely distributed in this area, with only a few villages having a low prevalence. The highest prevalence was observed in Nathia, Bundukundi, and Baraboye. Overall, although M. perstans was found to be highly prevalent among people older than 29 years (33.3%). No cases were detected in the group of the patients younger than 12 months.
Discussion
The results of the comparison of techniques for detecting M. perstans showed that qPCR could be successfully used to identify microfilaria in the samples used, revealing excellent sensitivity and specificity. Indeed, the sensitivity of qPCR was even higher than that of microscopy. For the three cases in which qPCR rendered a positive result for a microscopically “negative” slide, we suggest that the filariae were actually either missed (or misinterpreted) during examination or destroyed during slide preparation or that Mansonella DNA was present inside phagocytes. It is known that the microfilariemia maybe quite low in up to 70% of infected persons.34 It is also well known that molecular methods are much more sensitive for the detection of parasitaemia (plasmodia)35 and bacteremia (borreliae)36 compared with microscopic examination. This also appears to be the case for mansonellosis. Unfortunately, the entire sample on the slides was used for DNA extraction and thus cannot be reexamined. Despite its cost, qPCR was found to be very interesting for a retrospective study of M. perstans in this locality. On the basis of all these elements, we used qPCR for this study of filariasis in rural Senegal.
This retrospective study carried out using samples from the Kedougou area showed that M. perstans is widespread in this region. This wide distribution of microfilaria could be explained by the abundance of its vector and a good vectorial capacity. However, the vector of this microfilaria has not yet been identified in Senegal. Previous studies in other countries cited biting midges as vectors of M. perstans,37–39 but our study did not identify M. perstans in 1,129 Culicoides spp. collected in the same region where the human blood samples were studied. Most villages were located beside either a waterway or a depression that filled with water during the rainy season, thus constituting larval lodgings for the vector.40,41 M. perstans filariasis was found to affect all segments of the population, from school-age children to adults. The fact that the prevalence is higher among adults gave the impression that the immune response of the body against filariasis was absent as individuals infected in the second year (study results) should have ample time to develop antibodies against this parasite. However, as noted in other studies,1 adults were infected as frequently as children. The fact that the prevalence is higher among adults (Table 2) indicates that they were more exposed than children, or this may be explained by a cumulative effect. Except for the village of Samecouta, where this parasite was absent, all other villages showed infection, suggesting that M. perstans is endemic in this area. Further studies could identify if the absence of mansonelliasis in Samecouta identified in this study is real and propose possible explications of this phenomenon. The Iwol village, at an elevation 440 m higher than Ibel, had a prevalence of 25%. This could be explained by the number of samples obtained in Iwol (4).
Table 2.
Mansonella perstans prevalence rates for age groups
| < 12 months | 1–3 years | 4–6 years | 7–15 years | 16–29 years | 30–45 years | NA | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bandafassi | 0.0% (0/5) | 6.2% (1/16) | 0.0% (0/14) | 4.5% (1/22) | 0.0% (0/2) | 50.0% (1/2) | 10.0% (1/10) | 6.0% (4/71) |
| Baraboye | – | – | – | 33.3% (1/3) | – | – | – | 33.3% (1/3) |
| Boundoucoundi | 0.0% (0/2) | 0.0% (0/1) | 0.0% (0/6) | 54.0% (7/13) | – | 0.0% (0/1) | 0.0% (0/1) | 29.2% (7/24) |
| Etchwar | – | 0.0% (0/1) | 0.0% (0/1) | 50.0% (1/2) | – | – | – | 25.0% (1/4) |
| Ibel | 0.0% (0/1) | 22.2% (2/9) | 16.7% (2/12) | 10.0% (3/31) | 0.0% (0/1) | 0.0% (0/1) | 33.3% (4/12) | 16.4% (11/67) |
| Iwol | – | – | 33.3% (1/3) | 0.0% (0/1) | – | – | – | 25.0% (1/4) |
| Laminia | – | – | – | 15.4% (2/13) | – | – | – | 15.4% (2/13) |
| Nathia | 0.0% (0/1) | 100.0% (1/1) | 0.0% (0/1) | 41.2% (7/17) | 0.0% (0/1) | – | – | 38.1% (8/21) |
| Samecouta | – | 0.0% (0/1) | – | 0.0% (0/20) | – | – | – | 0.0% (0/21) |
| Thiabedji | 0.0% (0/1) | 0.0% (0/7) | 0.0% (0/9) | 14.3% (2/14) | – | – | 0.0% (0/6) | 5.4% (2/37) |
| Other villages | 0.0% (0/2) | 40.0% (2/5) | 0.0% (0/4) | 20.0% (1/5) | 20.0% (1/5) | 50.0% (1/2) | 11.1% (1/9) | 19.0% (6/32) |
| Total | 0.0% (0/12) | 15.0% (6/41) | 6.0% (3/50) | 18.0% (25/141) | 11.1% (1/9) | 33.3% (2/6) | 16.0% (6/38) | 14.5% (43/297) |
– = no data; NA = any information about the age.
Despite of the number (1,159) of Culicoides spp. tested, we did not identify M. perstans in studied arthropods. Many investigated species of Culicoides are considered to be anthoropophilic (C. imicola, C. enderleini, C. oxystoma, and C. kingi) in Senegal, and even to be implicated in the transmission of mansonellosis in Africa (C. fulvithorax).19 All midges were collected in April, the month when the maximum frequency of microfilaria in human blood smears was identified (data not shown). This limited collection, even performed in the possible transmission season, limits this study. Systematic screening of Culicoides midges for M. perstans throughout a year would have been preferred. The fact that all Culicoides tested by PCR were negative may suggest the role of another vector of M. perstans in this area such as Simulidae, Tabanidae, or Culicidae.
Although M. perstans is highly prevalent in some areas in Senegal, it is not associated with febrile conditions. Proposed real-time PCR specific for M. perstans allows the identification of these filariae in the stained blood smears. Further investigations are needed to determine the clinical impact of M. perstans among the population and to identify the vectors of this highly prevalent nematode.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank the Wellcome Trust for the support of the prospective study to investigate malaria in schoolchildren in Senegal and the national and local health authorities who supported the implementation of this research. We thank Gilles Chauvancy for technical support, the population of the study area for their participation in these studies and health officials for their support and cooperation, and members of the field research team.
Footnotes
Financial support: This work was financially supported by Agence National de Recherche grant 2010 (MALEMAF) and the IHU Méditerranée Infection.
Authors' addresses: Hubert Bassene, Masse Sambou, Sawdiatou Djiba, and Oleg Mediannikov, Campus Universitaire UCAD-IRD de Hann, Route des Pères Maristes, Dakar, Senegal, E-mails: hubert.bassene@ird.fr, masse.sambou@ird.fr, sawdiadjiba@yahoo.fr, and olegusss1@gmail.com. Florence Fenollar, Gaël Mourembou, and Didier Raoult, Faculté de Médecine, Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France, E-mails: florence.fenollar@univ-amu.fr, gaelmourembou@yahoo.fr, and didier.raoult@gmail.com. Siân Clarke, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom, E-mail: sian.clarke@lshtm.ac.uk. Alioune Badara L. Y., Ministry of Health, Fann Résidence, Rue Aimé Césaire Dakar, Senegal, E-mail: alioune_lyb@yahoo.fr.
References
- 1.Simonsen PE, Onapa AW, Asio SM. Mansonella perstans filariasis in Africa. Acta Trop. 2011;120((Suppl 1)):S109–S120. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2010.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Downes BL, Jacobsen KH. A systematic review of the epidemiology of mansonelliasis. Afr J Infect Dis. 2010;4:7–14. doi: 10.4314/ajid.v4i1.55085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gbary AR, Guiguemde TR, Ouedraogo JB, Lechuga P. Filarial multiparasitism in the savannah zone in Burkina Faso. Med Trop. 1987;47:329–332. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bregani ER, Tantardini F, Rovellini A. Mansonella perstans filariasis. Parassitologia. 2007;49:23–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Walther M, Muller R. Diagnosis of human filariases (except onchocerciasis) Adv Parasitol. 2003;53:149–153. doi: 10.1016/s0065-308x(03)53004-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mateu L, Sopena N, Giménez M, Valerio L. Mansonella perstans isolated on aspiration puncture of a salivary gland. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2008;59:145–147. doi: 10.1016/s0001-6519(08)73283-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cohen J, Ribeiro J, Martins M. Ocular manifestations in mansonelliasis. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2008;71:167–171. doi: 10.1590/s0004-27492008000200007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Baird J, Neafie R, Connor D. Nodules in the conjunctiva, bung-eye, and bulge-eye in Africa caused by Mansonella perstans. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1988;38:553–557. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1988.38.553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Araki Y, Bamba T, Mukaisho K, Kanauchi O, Ban H, Bamba S, Andoh A, Fujiyama Y, Hattori T, Sugihara H. Dextran sulfate sodium administered orally is depolymerized in the stomach and induces cell cycle arrest plus apoptosis in the colon in early mouse colitis. Oncol Rep. 2012;28:1597–1605. doi: 10.3892/or.2012.1969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Asio SM, Simonsen PE, Onapa AW. Analysis of the 24-h microfilarial periodicity of Mansonella perstans. Parasitol Res. 2009;104:945–948. doi: 10.1007/s00436-008-1312-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Klion AD, Massougbodji A, Sadeler BC, Ottesen EA, Nutman TB. Loiasis in endemic and nonendemic populations: immunologically mediated differences in clinical presentation. J Infect Dis. 1991;163:1318–1325. doi: 10.1093/infdis/163.6.1318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fux CA, Chappuis B, Holzer B, Aebi C, Bordmann G, Marti H, Hatz C. Mansonella perstans causing symptomatic hypereosinophilia in a missionary family. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2006;4:275–280. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2005.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sharp NAD. Development of Microfilaria perstans in Culicoides grahami; a preliminary note. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1927;27:70. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sharp NAD. Filaria perstans; its development in Culicoides austeni. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1928;21:371–396. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hopkins CA. Notes on the biology of certain Culicoides studied in the British Cameroons, west Africa, together with observations on their possible role as vectors of Acanthocheilonema perstans. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1952;46:165–172. doi: 10.1080/00034983.1952.11685521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hopkins CA, Nicholas WL. Culicoides austeni, the vector of Acanthocheilonema perstans. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1952;46:276–283. doi: 10.1080/00034983.1952.11685532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Clarke Vde V, Harwin R, MacDonald D, Green C, Rittey D. Filariasis: Dipetalonema perstans infections in Rhodesia. Cent Afr J Med. 1971;17:1–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Noireau F, Itoua A, Carme B. Epidemiology of Mansonella perstans filariasis in the forest region of south Congo. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1990;84:251–254. doi: 10.1080/00034983.1990.11812464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Agbolade OM, Akinboye DO, Olateju TM, Ayanbiyi OA, Kuloyo OO, Fenuga OO. Biting of anthropophilic Culicoides fulvithorax (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae), a vector of Mansonella perstans in Nigeria. Korean J Parasitol. 2006;44:67–72. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2006.44.1.67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Khamala C, Kettle D. The Culicoides latreille (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) of east Africa. Trans R Entomol Soc Lond. 1971;123:1–95. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pfister R. Résultats d'une enquête sur les porteurs de microfilaire en Afrique Occidentale Française. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 1954;47:408–411. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hocquet P, Lariviere M, Camerlynck P, Diallo S. Contribution a l'etude de la repartition des filarioses humaines au Senegal: enquetes dans la region de Damantan (Senegal oriental) et la Region cotiere de Casamance. Bull Soc Med Afr Noire Lang Fr. 1964;9:398–405. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sokhna C, Mediannikov O, Fenollar F, Bassene H, Diatta G, Tall A, Trape J-F, Drancourt M, Raoult D. Point-of-care laboratory of pathogen diagnosis in rural Senegal. PLoS Negl Tropical Dis. 2013;7:1–10. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wanji S, Tendongfor N, Esum M, Ndindeng S, Enyong P. Epidemiology of concomitant infections due to Loa loa, Mansonella perstans, and Onchocerca volvulus in rain forest villages of Cameroon. Med Microbiol Immunol (Berl) 2003;192:15–21. doi: 10.1007/s00430-002-0154-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Trape JF, Tall A, Sokhna C, Ly AB, Diagne N, Ndiath O, Mazenot C, Richard V, Badiane A, Dieye-Ba F, Faye J, Ndiaye G, Diene Sarr F, Roucher C, Bouganali C, Bassene H, Toure-Balde A, Roussilhon C, Perraut R, Spiegel A, Sarthou JL, da Silva LP, Mercereau-Puijalon O, Druilhe P, Rogier C. The rise and fall of malaria in a west African rural community, Dielmo, Senegal, from 1990 to 2012: a 22 year longitudinal study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14:476–488. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70712-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Roucher C, Rogier C, Sokhna C, Tall A, Trape JF. A 20-year longitudinal study of Plasmodium ovale and Plasmodium malariae prevalence and morbidity in a west African population. PLoS One. 2014;9:e87169. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sudia W, Chamberlain R. Battery light trap, an improved model. Mosq News. 1962;22:126–129. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Cornet M, Brunhes J. Révisions des espèces de Culicoides apparentées à C. schultzei (Enderlein, 1908) dans la région afrotropicale (Diptera, Ceratopogonidae) Bull Soc Entomol Fr. 1994;99:149–164. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Glick J. Culicoides biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) of Kenya. J Med Entomol. 1990;27:85–195. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/27.2.85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cornet M. Les Culicoides (Diptera Ceratopogonidae) de l'Ouest africain (1ère note) Cah ORSTOM, sér Ent méd Parasitol VII. 1969:341–364. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sambou M, Faye N, Bassene H, Diatta G, Raoult D, Mediannikov O. Identification of rickettsial pathogens in ixodid ticks in northern Senegal. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2014;5:552–556. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2014.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Socolovschi C, Mediannikov O, Sokhna C, Tall A, Diatta G, Bassene H, Trape J, Raoult D. Rickettsia felis-associated uneruptive fever, Senegal. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:1140–1142. doi: 10.3201/eid1607.100070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Keiser PB, Coulibaly Y, Kubofcik J, Diallo AA, Klion AD, Traore SF, Nutman TB. Molecular identification of Wolbachia from the filarial nematode Mansonella perstans. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2008;160:123–128. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2008.04.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Raccurt CP, Brasseur P, Ciceron M, Boncy J. Epidemiologic survey of Mansonella ozzardi in Corail, Haiti. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014;90:1167–1169. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.13-0619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Andrews L, Andersen R, Webster D, Dunachie S, Walther R, Bejon P, Hunt-Cooke A, Bergson G, Sanderson F, Hill AVS, Gilbert SC. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction for malaria diagnosis and its use in malaria vaccine clinical trials. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;73:191–198. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Parola P, Diatta G, Socolovschi C, Mediannikov O, Tall A, Bassene H, Trape J-F, Raoult D. Tick-borne relapsing fever borreliosis, rural Senegal. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:883–885. doi: 10.3201/eid1705.100573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Noireau F, Itoua A, Carme B. Epidemiology of Mansonella perstans filariasis in the forest region of south Congo. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1990;84:251–254. doi: 10.1080/00034983.1990.11812464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sharp N. Filaria perstans; its development in Culicoides austeni. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1928;21:371–396. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Agbolade O, Akinboye D. Loa loa and Mansonella perstans infections in Ijebu North, western Nigeria: a parasitological study. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2001;54:108–110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hopkins C. Notes on the biology of certain Culicoides studied in the British Cameroons, west Africa, together with observations on their possible role as vectors of Acanthocheilonema perstans. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1952;46:165–172. doi: 10.1080/00034983.1952.11685521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hopkins C, Nicholas W. Culicoides austeni, the vector of Acanthocheilonema perstans. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1952;46:276–283. doi: 10.1080/00034983.1952.11685532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

