Skip to main content
Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases logoLink to Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases
. 2015 Jul;7:177–180.

Minimum Requirements for Reporting Fecal Microbiota Transplant Trial

Shirin Moossavi 1, Faraz Bishehsari 2, Reza Ansari 1, Homayoon Vahedi 1, Siavosh Nasseri-Moghaddam 1, Shahin Merat 1, Iradj Sobhani 3, Ali Keshavarzian 2, Reza Malekzadeh 1,*
PMCID: PMC4560633  PMID: 26396721

Fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) research trials are growing in diverse intestinal and extraintestinal conditions that are thought to be either caused or correlated with gut microbiota dysbiosis. Although, the mechanism by which the microbiota results in disease initiation or progression is not fully understood, it is speculated that restoring the symbiosis by FMT could have therapeutic benefits.

FMT is currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of recurrent pseudomembranous colitis caused by Clostridium difficile; which is a direct consequence of alteration in microbiota composition caused by long-term antibiotics consumption. Because the disease is directly linked to an altered microbiota composition, it is intuitive that restoring the normal composition -by using non-stringent criteria to define ‘normal’- will alter the niche in a way that the commensals will outcompete C. difficile bacteria and hence, the infection will be controlled in an ecological manner.1

So far, 15 trials have been conducted and published with completely successful results for the treatment of pseudomembranous colitis caused by C. difficile.2-16 However, unlike C. difficile infection, FMT in other conditions, such as ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) have had controversial results.17-24 UC and CD are complex disorders that arise as a result of a complex interplay of host genetics, gut microbiota, host immune response, and environmental factors. It is crucial to identify confounding factors in FMT trials in complex diseases in order to perform more uniform and effective trials in the future.

Except the CONSORT checklist that is used for clinical trials,25 there is currently no specific minimum requirement for the report of an FMT trial. We can identify two different types of FMT trial. The first type focuses primarily on treating a debilitating, life-threatening condition (e.g., refractory C. difficile-induced colitis and in exceptional cases IBD); for which no other therapeutic option is currently available. The second type of trials aims to investigate the efficacy of FMT in conditions where other treatment options are available but are associated with high side effect profiles or high cost (e.g. morbid obesity and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis). In both types the donor inclusion and exclusion criteria have been developed, which are summarised in Table 1. It should be noted that endemic infectious diseases of each region should also be assessed as part of donor exclusion criteria. However, for the investigational FMT trials it is advisable to take into account the complexity of the gut microbiota.

Table 1 . Donor assessment criteria for fecal microbiota transplant trial (adapted and modified from Bakken et al.1) .

Exclusion criteria •Age <18 or >65 years
•Previous or current history of autoimmune, atopic, metabolic, and mood disorders
•Previous or current history of gastrointestinal diseases including IBS, IBD, constipation, celiac disease, and gastrointestinal cancer.
•Previous or current history of cardiovascular, respiratory, pancreatobiliary, and genitourinary diseases
•Diabetes (FPG ≥126 mg/dL or 2-h PG ≥200 mg/dL)
•Impaired fasting glucose (110 mg/dL ≤FPG <126 mg/dL or 140 mg/dL ≤2-h PG <200 mg/dL)
•Obesity (BMI ≥ 30)
•Parkinson disease
•Abnormal result of the stool and blood tests (see below)
•History of major gastrointestinal surgery (e.g. gastric bypass)
•Personal or family history of malignancy
•Dementia, severe depression, major psychiatric disorder, or other incapacity for adequate cooperation
•Chronic pain syndromes (eg. chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia)
•Allergy to food and drugs
•Use of immunosuppressive or chemotherapy agents
•Antimicrobial treatment or prophylaxis within the last 6 months
•Pregnant or breast-feeding women
•Tattoo or body piercing within the last 6 months
•Travel to areas with endemic diarrhea during the last 3 months
•Alcohol consumption> 15 units /week for women and > 22 units /week for men
•Illicit drugs consumption
•Shift work
Stool testing Clostridium difficile, Listeria monocytogenes, Vibrio cholerae/Vibrio parahemolyticus, Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, Yersinia, β-lactamase-resistant bacteria, Strongyloides stercoralis, Cryptosporidium sp., Cyclospora sp., Entamoeba histolytica, Giardia intestinalis, Isospora sp., Microsporidium, Anguillules, Giardia intestinalis
Adenovirus, Astrovirus, Norovirus, Sapovirus, Enterovirus, Virus Aichi, Rotavirus, HAV, HEV
•Ova
Serologic testing •HIV, type 1 and 2
•HTLV
•Hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis B core antibody (both IgG and IgM), and hepatitis B surface antibody
•Hepatitis C virus antibody
Treponema pallidum
Strongyloides stercoralis, Toxoplasma gondii, Trichinella sp.
•Laboratory indices (FPG, HbA1c, AST, ALT, ALP, bilirubin, AFP, BUN, creatinine, uric acid, triglyceride, cholesterol, HDL, LDL)
•CMV viral Load
•EBV viral Load

2-h PG, 2 hour plasma glucose; AFP, alpha fetoprotein; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BMI, body mass index; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; CMV, Cytomegalovirus; EBV, Epstein–Barr virus; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HAV, Hepatitis A virus; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; HEV, Hepatitis E virus; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; HTLV, Human T-Cell Leukemia Virus; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; IBS, irritable bowel syndrome; LDL, low-density lipoprotein.

Donor is currently selected based on ascertaining the individual’s healthy state by medical history, physical examination, and laboratory tests. The donor is also screened for a number of infective agents including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV). However, given the multitude of genetic and environmental factors that can modify the gut microbiota, it is apparent that lack of clinical diseases does not correlate with having a ‘normal’ microbiota. In addition, one cannot exclude the possibility that a ‘healthy’ donor, whose microbiome is considered ‘normal’, would not develop a disease later in life, that maybe known to be associated with abnormal microbiota. Therefore, it seems reasonable to ascertain the normal composition of the donor microbiota prior to the procedure. In addition, even if the donor is clinically healthy and the microbiota composition is assessed to be ‘normal’; it is imperative to select the donor based on the expected beneficial alterations that are exerted on the patient microbiota by the donor fecal microbiota (Table 2). Therefore, we recommend that there are two potential ways to select healthy donors based on criteria outlined in Tables 1 and 2. In one approach, one ad hoc donor is selected for each FMT recipient whereas in the second one, universal donors are identified to use for all FMT recipients in a trial. The advantage of universal donors is that for a given trial all patients will receive identical donor microbiota and thus potential confounding effect of different transplanted microbiota is eliminated. By incorporating microbiota analysis in all FMT trials we would expect to observe more consistent and informative results in future FMT trials.

Table 2 . Specific recommended additions to the CONSORT checklist in investigational fecal microbiota transplant trials .

Topic Item no. Checklist item Recommendation
Participants 4a Donor inclusion criteria Based on the gut microbiota composition of the donor and the expected beneficial alteration in the recipient
Intervention 5 The interventions for each group with sufficient details to allow replication Include a microbiota composition analysis for both donor and recipient
Outcomes 6a Completely defined pre-specified primary and secondary outcome measures Durability assessment should be mandatory

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this work.

Please cite this paper as:

Moossavi S, Bishehsari F, Ansari R, Vahedi H, Nasseri-Moghaddam S, Merat S, Sobhani I, Keshavarzian A, Malekzadeh R. Minimum Requirements for Reporting Fecal Microbiota Transplant Trial. Middle East J Dig Dis 2015;7:177-80.

References

  • 1.Bakken JS, Borody T, Brandt LJ, Brill JV, Demarco DC, Franzos MA. et al. Treating Clostridium difficile infection with fecal microbiota transplantation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:1044–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.08.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jorup-Ronstrom C, Hakanson A, Sandell S, Edvinsson O, Midtvedt T, Persson AK. et al. Fecal transplant against relapsing Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in 32 patients. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:548–52. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2012.672587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Youngster I, Sauk J, Pindar C, Wilson RG, Kaplan JL, Smith MB. et al. Fecal microbiota transplant for relapsing Clostridium difficile infection using a frozen inoculum from unrelated donors: a randomized, open-label, controlled pilot study. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58:1515–22. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Trubiano JA, George A, Barnett J, Siwan M, Heriot A, Prince HM. et al. A different kind of “allogeneic transplant”: successful fecal microbiota transplant for recurrent and refractory Clostridium difficile infection in a patient with relapsed aggressive B-cell lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2015;56:512–4. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2014.920503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Russell GH, Kaplan JL, Youngster I, Baril-Dore M, Schindelar L, Hohmann E. et al. Fecal transplant for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection in children with and without inflammatory bowel disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014;58:588–92. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kelly CR, Ihunnah C, Fischer M, Khoruts A, Surawicz C, Afzali A. et al. Fecal Microbiota Transplant for Treatment of Clostridium difficile Infection in Immunocompromised Patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:1065–71. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Friedman-Moraco RJ, Mehta AK, Lyon GM, Kraft CS. Fecal microbiota transplantation for refractory Clostridium difficile colitis in solid organ transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2014;14:477–80. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Patel NC, Griesbach CL, DiBaise JK, Orenstein R. Fecal microbiota transplant for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: Mayo Clinic in Arizona experience. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013;88:799–805. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.04.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lofland D, Josephat F, Partin S. Fecal transplant for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Lab Sci. 2013;26:131–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kleger A, Schnell J, Essig A, Wagner M, Bommer M, Seufferlein T. et al. Fecal transplant in refractory Clostridium difficile colitis. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2013;110:108–15. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2013.0108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Stollman N, Surawicz C. Fecal transplant for Clostridium difficile. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:825; author reply 825–6. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.1055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Neemann K, Eichele DD, Smith PW, Bociek R, Akhtari M, Freifeld A. Fecal microbiota transplantation for fulminant Clostridium difficile infection in an allogeneic stem cell transplant patient. Transplant Infect Dis. 2012;14:E161–5. doi: 10.1111/tid.12017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kassam Z, Hundal R, Marshall JK, Lee CH. Fecal transplant via retention enema for refractory or recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:191–3. doi: 10.1001/archinte.172.2.191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Brandt LJ, Aroniadis OC, Mellow M, Kanatzar A, Kelly C, Park T. et al. Long-term follow-up of colonoscopic fecal microbiota transplant for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:1079–87. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kahn SA, Young S, Rubin DT. Colonoscopic fecal microbiota transplant for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection in a child. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:1930–1. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gallegos-Orozco JF, Paskvan-Gawryletz CD, Gurudu SR, Orenstein R. Successful colonoscopic fecal transplant for severe acute Clostridium difficile pseudomembranous colitis. Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2012;77:40–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kump PK, Grochenig HP, Lackner S, Trajanoski S, Reicht G, Hoffmann KM. et al. Alteration of intestinal dysbiosis by fecal microbiota transplantation does not induce remission in patients with chronic active ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013;19:2155–65. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0b013e31829ea325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Allegretti JR, Hamilton MJ. Restoring the gut microbiome for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:3468–74. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i13.3468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhang FM, Wang HG, Wang M, Cui BT, Fan ZN, Ji GZ. Fecal microbiota transplantation for severe enterocolonic fistulizing Crohn’s disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:7213–6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i41.7213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.De Leon LM, Watson JB, Kelly CR. Transient flare of ulcerative colitis after fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11:1036–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.04.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Brown AC. Ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease and irritable bowel syndrome patients need fecal transplant research and treatment. J Crohns Colitis. 2014;8:179. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2013.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kunde S, Pham A, Bonczyk S, Crumb T, Duba M, Conrad H, Jr Jr. et al. Safety, tolerability, and clinical response after fecal transplantation in children and young adults with ulcerative colitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013;56:597–601. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e318292fa0d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zainah H, Silverman A. Fecal Bacteriotherapy: A Case Report in an Immunosuppressed Patient with Ulcerative Colitis and Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection. Case Rep Infect Dis. 2012;2012:810943. doi: 10.1155/2012/810943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kao D, Hotte N, Gillevet P, Madsen K. Fecal microbiota transplantation inducing remission in Crohn’s colitis and the associated changes in fecal microbial profile. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014;48:625–8. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:834–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases are provided here courtesy of Iranian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

RESOURCES