Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015 Sep;16(7):e201–e206. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000492

Detection of multiple respiratory viruses associated with mortality and severity of illness in children

Kyle J Rehder 1, Elizabeth A Wilson 2, Kanecia O Zimmerman 1, Coleen K Cunningham 3, David A Turner 1
PMCID: PMC4560664  NIHMSID: NIHMS690782  PMID: 26121097

Abstract

Objective

Respiratory viral infection is a common source of morbidity and mortality in children. Co-infection with multiple viruses occurs frequently; however, the clinical significance of concomitant viral pathogens is unclear. We hypothesized that presence of more than one respiratory virus is associated with increased morbidity and mortality when compared to children with a single respiratory virus.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

A tertiary care hospital.

Patients

All children at Duke Children’s Hospital over a two year period with isolation of a virus on an extended viral respiratory panel (EVRP) result. Demographic data, co-morbidities, and details of hospital encounter were recorded.

Interventions

None

Measurements and Main Results

235 hospital encounters demonstrated positive EVRPs. Immunocompromised status (37%) and respiratory comorbidities (23%) were common. 28 patients (12%) tested positive for multiple viruses, with adenovirus (23/28) and respiratory syncytial virus (15/28) most prevalent in patients with multiple viruses. Viral co-detection was associated with increased use of non-invasive ventilation (p=0.02), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (p=0.02), increased likelihood of moderate or severe illness (p=0.005) and increased mortality (p=0.01). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that this mortality association persisted for children with normal immune function (p=0.003) and children with no comorbidities (p=0.007).

Conclusions

Children with multiple respiratory viruses may be at increased risk of moderate or severe illness and mortality, with previously healthy children potentially being at greatest risk. Further studies are indicated to determine the significance and generalizability of this finding and to better understand the pathophysiology of viral co-infection.

Keywords: pediatric, virus, severity of illness, respiratory, adenovirus, influenza, human metapneumovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza

Introduction

Viral respiratory infections are a common source of disease burden in young children worldwide19. Respiratory viruses such as influenza, respiratory syncytial virus and human metapneumovirus each individually account for annual hospitalization rates of more than 1 per 1000 children, with higher rates for children less than 12 months of age2,3,6. Hospitalization is a small portion of the overall societal burden of these diseases, as they also account for substantial number of outpatient visits, emergency room visits, parental absence from work, and cost 10,11.

Simultaneous co-infection with more than one respiratory virus in children is relatively common, with reported rates in symptomatic children of 10 to 40%1218. While bacterial co-infection with a respiratory virus clearly increases morbidity and mortality19, the impact and clinical implications of co-infection with multiple viral pathogens is unclear. Conceptually, multiple pathogens should increase risk of severe illness; however, the inflammatory response generated by one virus may not be significantly increased by the presence of a second or third virus8. The published data regarding the outcomes associated with respiratory viral co-infection are mixed14,15,2022.

When compared to children with a single respiratory virus, we hypothesized that children with isolation of multiple respiratory viral pathogens would have increased hospital mortality. We also hypothesized that multiple respiratory viral pathogens would increase severity of illness, as indicated by more frequent need for intensive therapies.

Methods

Duke University Medical Center began offering an extended viral respiratory panel (EVRP) for clinical testing in February 2011. Real-time polymerase chain reaction testing was performed on nasal washings from patients. This extended panel (Prodesse, Waukesha, WI) tested for adenovirus, human metapneumovirus (HMPV), influenza A and B, parainfluenza 1, 2, and 3, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Use of this test was at clinician discretion and not restricted to any specific population, nor was it protocolized within the institution. There was a separate rapid screen for influenza and RSV which was also available for clinicians. EVRP positivity rate at our institution ranges between 10% and 30%, displaying seasonal variation for individual viruses.

Duke Children’s Hospital is a 190 bed institution affiliated with Duke University Medical Center, and accounts for almost 200,000 pediatric outpatient visits, 15,000 emergency department visits, and 5,000 inpatient visits annually. Included in the 190 inpatient beds are 50 neonatal intensive care beds, 29 pediatric critical care beds, and a 16 bed bone marrow transplant unit capable of providing non-invasive bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP).

With institutional review board approval, we completed a retrospective chart review of all patients ≤ 18 years of age with a positive EVRP result at Duke University Medical Center from introduction of clinical testing through the next two respiratory viral seasons (through June 2013). Demographic data collected included age, race and ethnicity, presence of comorbidities, and immunocompromised status. Encounter data included location (inpatient, emergency department, or outpatient) and details of visit including length of stay, therapies administered, and certain diagnoses (sepsis, shock, pneumonia, bronchiolitis, and/or bacteremia).

Definitions

An encounter was defined as the provider visit in which the positive EVRP was collected. ‘Hospital’ encounters included inpatient admissions and emergency department (ED) visits. Outpatient encounters were excluded from analysis. If the patient was seen in two different hospital or clinic visits separated by less than 48 hours, these visits were considered part of the same encounter. Viral co-detection was defined as separate viruses detected on the same EVRP.

For hospital encounters, mortality was measured by survival to encounter discharge. Surrogates for severity of illness included therapies provided to the patient during that encounter, including intensive care unit (ICU) admission, assisted ventilation (non-invasive or invasive), use of inotropes, or use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). “Moderate disease” was defined as receiving non-invasive ventilation, while “severe disease” was defined as receiving intubation and mechanical ventilation, ECMO, and/or inotropic support. Diagnoses of shock, sepsis, bronchiolitis, and pneumonia were based on physician note documentation. Bacteremia was recorded only in the presence of a blood culture positive for a pathogen during that encounter. Typical contaminants, such as staphylococcus epidermidus, were excluded.

Respiratory comorbidities and immunocompromised states were identified during chart review of provider notes and diagnoses. Respiratory comorbidities included clinical diagnoses of asthma, cystic fibrosis, chronic lung disease, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, interstitial or restrictive lung disease, recurrent aspiration, subglottic stenosis, or laryngo-, tracheo- or bronchomalacia. Patients were classified as immunocompromised if they had received chemotherapeutic agents for cancer treatment in the six months prior to encounter date, were on chronic glucocorticoid therapy with ≥ 14 days of steroids in the six months prior to encounter date, were currently receiving immunomodulants for auto-immune disease, had any history of a solid organ or hematopoetic stem cell transplant (HSCT), or had been diagnosed with primary immunodeficiency. Complex congenital heart disease was defined as cyanotic heart disease or left-sided obstructive lesions. Prematurity was defined as birth prior to 37 weeks gestational age.

For therapies, non-invasive mechanical ventilation was defined as continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), BiPAP, or high-flow nasal cannula ≥ 5 Lpm in infants (≤12 months of age) or ≥ 8 Lpm in older children. Use of inotropes included any use of epinephrine, dopamine, dobutamine, norepinephrine, or vasopressin infusions for blood pressure support.

Statistical Analysis

For univariate analysis, continuous variables were compared using Wilcoxon’s Rank Sums Test; dichotomous variables were compared using chi-squared analysis. Multivariable logistic regression was then performed to evaluate the association between viral co-detection and the development of moderate to severe disease when controlling for other factors. Univariate analysis was performed using JMP v. 11 (SAS, Inc., Cary, NC), while STATA 13 (College Station, TX) was used for multivariable analyses. P values ≤ 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Positive EVRP results were found in 235 encounters for 202 individual patients. Table 1 summarizes the demographics for the patients included in the study. Most patients in this series (178 of 235; 76%) had at least one underlying comorbidity.

Table 1.

Cohort demographics

Patients
N=202
Encounters
N=235
Median age in months (IQR) 24 (9,55) 26 (12, 53)
Race / Ethnicity
 -Asian 2 (1%) 2 (<1%)
 -Black or African American 73 (36%) 88 (37%)
 -Hispanic or Latino 36 (18%) 42 (18%)
 -White or Caucasian 83 (41%) 96 (41%)
Male 111 (55%) 105 (45%)
Prematurity (<37 weeks GA) 44 (22%) 54 (23%)
Respiratory comorbidity 50 (25%) 55 (23%)
 -Asthma 22 (11%) 23 (10%)
 -Cystic fibrosis 8 (4%) 8 (3%)
 -Chronic lung disease 10 (5%) 10 (4%)
 -Bronchopulmonary dysplasia 2 (1%) 2 (<1%)
 -Malacia* 2 (1%) 6 (3%)
 -Other# 6 (3%) 6 (3%)
Complex congenital heart disease 14 (7%) 19 (8%)
Immunocompromised 73 (36%) 86 (37%)
 -Primary immunodeficiency 4 (2%) 8 (3%)
 -Cancer receiving chemotherapy 10 (5%) 15 (6%)
 -Hematopoetic stem cell transplantation 16 (8%) 22 (9%)
 -Solid organ transplant 20 (10%) 40 (17%)
 -Other immunomodulants$ 1 (<1%) 1 (<1%)

Age of patient at first encounter during study period

*

Includes laryngo-, tracheo-, and bronchomalacia

#

Includes interstitial lung disease, restrictive lung disease, recurrent aspiration, and subglottic stenosis

$

Includes mycophenylate and chronic steroid use

EVRP detected 264 viruses during these 235 encounters. Table 2 summarizes EVRP results. In 207 of 235 encounters (88%), EVRP samples were sent within the first 72 hours of admission to the hospital. Viral co-detection was present in 28 encounters (12%), with one patient testing positive for three separate viruses. Adenovirus was isolated in 23 of the 28 (82%) patients with viral co-detection, RSV was isolated in 15 of 28 (54%), and either adenovirus or RSV were isolated in 27 of these 28 (96%) patients.

Table 2.

Identified viral pathogens

Virus N=264

Adenovirus 85 (32%)

Human metapneumovirus 48 (18%)

Influenza 19 (7%)
 -Influenza A −7 (3%)
 -Influenza B −12 (5%)

Parainfluenza 44 (17%)
 -Parainfluenza 1 −9 (3%)
 -Parainfluenza 2 −9 (3%)
 -Parainfluenza 3 −26(10%)

Respiratory syncytial virus 69 (26%)

Co-infections* N=28

ADV + FLU 1 (4%)

ADV + HMPV 7 (25%)

ADV + PARA 4 (14%)

ADV + RSV 10 (36%)

FLU + RSV 1 (4%)

HMPV + PARA 1 (4%)

HMPV + RSV 1 (4%)

PARA + RSV 2 (7%)

ADV + PARA + RSV 1 (4%)
*

ADV = adenovirus, FLU = influenza, HMPV = human metapneumovirus, PARA = parainfluenza, RSV = respiratory syncytial virus

There was no statistical difference in viral co-detection rates based on patient demographics including age, race, ethnic group, or gender, nor was there a difference in viral co-detection rates based on prematurity, immunocompromised status, respiratory comorbidity, or complex congenital heart disease.

Patient Outcomes by Viral Co-Infection

Table 3 compares the clinical findings for those patients with multiple viral isolates to those with a single respiratory virus. For the diagnoses and treatment modalities reported in Table 3, there was no difference attributable to race or ethnicity. Of note, presence of viral co-detection was associated with increased likelihood of moderate or severe illness and with hospital mortality.

Table 3.

Univariate analysis of single respiratory virus detection vs. viral co-detection.

Single respiratory virus
N=207
Respiratory viral co-detection
N=28
P value
Demographics
 Median age in months (IQR) 28 (12, 55) 18 (10, 48) 0.27
 Male 114 (55%) 16 (57%) 0.83
 Prematurity 46 (22%) 8 (29%) 0.48
 Respiratory comorbidity 50 (24%) 5 (18%) 0.45
 Complex congenital heart disease 18 (9%) 1 (4%) 0.30
 Immunocompromised 76 (37%) 10 (36%) 0.92
Hospital stay
 Hospital length of stay (days; median, IQR) 8 (4,20) 11 (3,42) 0.61
 ICU admission required 103 (50%) 16 (57%) 0.46
 ICU length of stay (days; median, IQR) 5 (2,17) 9 (1, 18) 0.92
Therapies and severity of illness
 Non-invasive ventilation 60 (29%) 14 (50%) 0.02
 Invasive mechanical ventilation 48 (23%) 8 (29%) 0.53
 Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation 2 (1%) 2 (7%) 0.02
 Inotropes 25 (12%) 6 (21%) 0.17
 Moderate or severe illness 79 (39%) 17 (61%) 0.02
 Death during encounter 7 (3%) 4 (14%) 0.01
Diagnoses during encounter
 Diagnosis of sepsis 28 (14%) 2 (7%) 0.34
 Diagnosis of shock 13 (6%) 1 (4%) 0.57
 Bacteremia (culture positive) 22 (11%) 3 (11%) 0.99
 Pneumonia (clinical diagnosis) 47 (23%) 6 (21%) 0.88
 Bronchiolitis (clinical diagnosis) 43 (21%) 7 (25%) 0.61

Among all children with isolation of viruses, patients who were premature at birth were more frequently admitted to the ICU (67% vs. 46%, p=0.003), receive invasive (35% vs. 21%, p=0.03) and non-invasive (50% vs. 26%, p=0.001) ventilation, and have moderate or severe illness (59% vs. 36%, p=0.002), but did not have increased mortality compared to full-term children. Patients with respiratory comorbidities were more frequently diagnosed with pneumonia (36% vs. 18%, p=0.005), but otherwise did not differ statistically from the remainder of the cohort in terms of therapies or survival. Similarly, patients with complex congenital heart disease did not differ from the remainder of the cohort for any therapies or survival.

Presence of viral co-detection was not associated with hospital mortality for immunocompromised patients (20% vs. 8%, p=0.26). When compared to immunocompetent patients, a greater proportion of immunocompromised patients died during the encounter for all hospitalized patients (9% vs. 2%, p=0.01) and for patients admitted to the ICU (28% vs. 2%, p < 0.0001). However, immunocompromised patients were less frequently admitted to the ICU (34% vs. 60%, p<0.0001). A smaller proportion of immunocompromised patients received invasive (16% vs. 28%, p=0.03) or non-invasive (22% vs. 37%, p=0.02) ventilation, or demonstrated moderate to severe illness (29% vs. 48%, p=0.005), despite being more frequently diagnosed with sepsis (23% vs. 7%, p=0.0003) or exhibiting documented bacteremia (20% vs. 5%, p=0.0006).

For patients with normal immune function, patients with viral co-detection more frequently received ECMO support (11% vs. 1%, p=0.02) and more frequently died during that encounter (11% vs. 1%, p=0.003). For the 57 previously healthy patients (i.e. no associated comorbidities) seen in hospital encounters, viral co-detection was also associated with increased mortality (15% vs. 0%, p=0.007).

Associations by virus

RSV isolation was associated with younger age (median 22 vs. 29 months, p=0.02), diagnosis of bronchiolitis (43% vs. 12%, p<0.0001) and use of NIV (46% vs. 25%, p=0.002). RSV was less frequently associated with a diagnosis of sepsis (4% vs. 16%, p=0.01), but was associated with moderate or severe disease (52% vs. 36%, p=0.02). Patients with adenovirus were less likely to carry a diagnosis of bronchiolitis (11% vs. 27%, p=0.002). Patients with influenza were likely to be older (median 39 vs. 26 month s, p=0.01) and were less frequently diagnosed with bronchiolitis (0% vs. 23%, p=0.002). Individual viruses were not associated with mortality, ICU admission, bacteremia, intubation, ECMO use, or diagnoses of pneumonia or shock.

Multivariate analysis

Multivariable analysis demonstrates that isolation of two or more viruses increases the odds of moderate or severe disease when adjusted for patient age and the presence of any comorbidity (OR 2.59; 95% CI 1.12, 5.96). This analysis also indicates that older age (> 3 months), regardless of viral isolation or comorbidity, protects against moderate or severe disease when compared to age < 3 months (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.29, 0.67). Mortality was not included in multivariable analysis due to overall numbers of patients.

Discussion

While prior studies have demonstrated association between viral co-detection and diagnosis of viral pneumonia23, hospitalization rates12,15, and the severity of illness14, this is the first study to demonstrate both an increased severity of illness and mortality in children presenting to the hospital with isolation of viral co-pathogens. This finding is of particular import as some studies have demonstrated no worsening in clinical outcomes in the presence of multiple respiratory viruses2022. Increased mortality was associated with viral co-detection for this entire cohort, as well as patients with normal immune function, and for children without any previously existing comorbidities. The association between viral co-detection and moderate or severe illness also persisted in multivariable analysis.

The cohort reported in this study had a high prevalence (76%) of comorbidities and/or immunocompromised status. Given the additional cost of the EVRP testing and the availability of separate rapid RSV and influenza testing, use of the panel was often reserved for patients either presenting with a high severity of illness or at high risk of critical illness, with more than half of the inpatients in this cohort (119/235, 51%) being admitted to the ICU during their hospital admission. The baseline risk of severe illness for this cohort may have increased the likelihood of being able to demonstrate an association with mortality, when compared to prior studies evaluating the impact of viral co-detection on severity of illness2022.

For inpatients, it is counterintuitive that immunocompromised patients with positive viral testing were less frequently admitted to the ICU; however, this may be secondary to increased use of the EVRP for screening in immunocompromised children with mild symptoms. Similarly, immunocompromised patients may have been more likely to receive therapies to treat viral infection. Our data was incomplete regarding these therapies, but selected immunocompromised patients received cidofivir, ribavirin, foscarnet, ganciclovir, or intravenous immunoglobulins, all of which are not typically used when respiratory viruses are detected in immunocompetent patients. Finally, Duke Children’s Hospital has a Bone Marrow Transplant Unit which is able to care for many HSCT patients at a higher level of care than the general wards, and patients admitted to the Bone Marrow Transplant Unit were not included as ICU admissions.

While hospitalized immunocompromised patients demonstrated a higher overall mortality than immunocompetent patients, their mortality risk was not increased in the presence of viral co-detection. Contrarily, the subset of patients in this cohort who appeared to be at greatest risk of death secondary to viral co-pathogens were immunocompetent patients and patients without comorbidities. This association may be related to a vigorous inflammatory response to viral infection, which is responsible for many of the symptoms and illness severity in these patients8. The increased frequency of death in patients able to generate an adequate immune response to viruses supports the concept that multiple viral co-pathogens may exacerbate the inflammatory response, and subsequently, increase the severity of illness24,25. While immunocompromised patients demonstrated increased mortality with any viral detection, their reduced ability to generate a strong immune response may have been protective from increased severity of respiratory illness in the presence of multiple viral pathogens. While these data do not support firm conclusions regarding this finding, the discrepant outcomes in the immunocompetent vs. immunocompromised patients could provide an area for further investigation of treatment of respiratory viral infection through modulation of the immune response26.

This study has all of the inherent limitations of a retrospective review, including selection bias from a lack of prospectively determined inclusion and exclusion criteria and the lack of EVRP testing guidelines, along with the inability to control for many variables. Reliance on physician documentation for certain clinical diagnoses may be unreliable, therefore we chose more clear dichotomous outcomes (use of specific therapies) as surrogates for severity of illness. Routine viral screening was available for influenza and RSV, so to avoid unnecessary cost, many patients testing positive for one of these viruses may not have received EVRP testing and may not have been captured in this study. Also, the EVRP at Duke University Medical Center during this study period did not test for every potential respiratory virus, most notably rhinovirus, nor did we collect serum testing for non-respiratory viruses. We, therefore, may have underestimated the overall number of patients with respiratory viruses, including those with co-pathogens. However, presence of untested viruses among our single virus cohort would reduce differentiation between cohorts and therefore be more likely to produce a null effect, rather than the mortality difference we observed. Also of note, the data collection period for this study preceded the recent outbreak of enterovirus D68.

While this study evaluates the impact of isolation of respiratory viruses, it was not powered to evaluate the interactions of specific viruses. Just as certain individual viruses may be more virulent, it is possible that possible that specific virus combinations may be associated with worsened clinical outcomes18,27. The interactions between specific viruses are another area for further investigation with appropriately powered prospective studies.

Despite these limitations, this study demonstrates an association between viral co-detection and both severity of illness and mortality for children presenting for care at a tertiary medical center. While no causality may be inferred, awareness of this association may assist providers in both prognosis and identifying children at risk for critical illness. More so, this study supports the need for further research into the immune response to respiratory viruses, potential therapies to optimize that immune response, and evaluation of the complex interactions between respiratory viruses.

Conclusion

Isolation of two or more respiratory viral pathogens is associated with moderate or severe illness and death in children cared for in the hospital setting. Larger prospective studies are needed to clarify patients at greatest risk and to evaluate interactions between specific viruses.

Acknowledgments

Funding Source: No external funding was secured for this study. Dr. Zimmerman receives research funding from the NICHD (5T32 HD043029-12 PI: Benjamin)

Footnotes

Institution where study performed: Duke University Medical Center

Financial Disclosure: No authors have financial disclosures.

Conflict of Interest: No authors wish to disclose any conflicts of interest.

Clinical Trial Registration: N/A

References

  • 1.Respiratory syncytial virus activity--United States, July 2011-January 2013. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report. 2013 Mar 1;62(8):141–144. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Edwards KM, Zhu Y, Griffin MR, et al. Burden of human metapneumovirus infection in young children. The New England journal of medicine. 2013 Feb 14;368(7):633–643. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1204630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fischer Langley G, McCracken J, Arvelo W, et al. The epidemiology and clinical characteristics of young children hospitalized with respiratory syncytial virus infections in Guatemala (2007–2010) The Pediatric infectious disease journal. 2013 Jun;32(6):629–635. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e318289e3bc. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hahn A, Wang W, Jaggi P, et al. Human metapneumovirus infections are associated with severe morbidity in hospitalized children of all ages. Epidemiology and infection. 2013 Oct;141(10):2213–2223. doi: 10.1017/S0950268812002920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Moyes J, Cohen C, Pretorius M, et al. Epidemiology of respiratory syncytial virus-associated acute lower respiratory tract infection hospitalizations among HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected South African children, 2010–2011. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2013 Dec 15;208( Suppl 3):S217–226. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Poehling KA, Edwards KM, Griffin MR, et al. The burden of influenza in young children, 2004–2009. Pediatrics. 2013 Feb;131(2):207–216. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Spaeder MC, Custer JW, Bembea MM, Aganga DO, Song X, Scafidi S. A multicenter outcomes analysis of children with severe viral respiratory infection due to human metapneumovirus. Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies. 2013 Mar;14(3):268–272. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3182720fc7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fitch PM, Henderson P, Schwarze J. Respiratory and gastrointestinal epithelial modulation of the immune response during viral infection. Innate immunity. 2012 Feb;18(1):179–189. doi: 10.1177/1753425910391826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nair H, Nokes DJ, Gessner BD, et al. Global burden of acute lower respiratory infections due to respiratory syncytial virus in young children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2010 May 1;375(9725):1545–1555. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60206-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lambert SB, Allen KM, Carter RC, Nolan TM. The cost of community-managed viral respiratory illnesses in a cohort of healthy preschool-aged children. Respiratory research. 2008;9:11. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-9-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yin JK, Salkeld G, Lambert SB, et al. Estimates and determinants of economic impacts from influenza-like illnesses caused by respiratory viruses in Australian children attending childcare: a cohort study. Influenza and other respiratory viruses. 2013 Nov;7(6):1103–1112. doi: 10.1111/irv.12138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cilla G, Onate E, Perez-Yarza EG, Montes M, Vicente D, Perez-Trallero E. Viruses in community-acquired pneumonia in children aged less than 3 years old: High rate of viral coinfection. Journal of medical virology. 2008 Oct;80(10):1843–1849. doi: 10.1002/jmv.21271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ghani AS, Morrow BM, Hardie DR, Argent AC. An investigation into the prevalence and outcome of patients admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit with viral respiratory tract infections in Cape Town, South Africa. Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies. 2012 Sep;13(5):e275–281. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3182417848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Harada Y, Kinoshita F, Yoshida LM, et al. Does respiratory virus coinfection increases the clinical severity of acute respiratory infection among children infected with respiratory syncytial virus? The Pediatric infectious disease journal. 2013 May;32(5):441–445. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31828ba08c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kouni S, Karakitsos P, Chranioti A, Theodoridou M, Chrousos G, Michos A. Evaluation of viral co-infections in hospitalized and non-hospitalized children with respiratory infections using microarrays. Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2013 Aug;19(8):772–777. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pretorius MA, Madhi SA, Cohen C, et al. Respiratory viral coinfections identified by a 10-plex real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction assay in patients hospitalized with severe acute respiratory illness--South Africa, 2009–2010. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2012 Dec 15;206( Suppl 1):S159–165. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wolf DG, Greenberg D, Kalkstein D, et al. Comparison of human metapneumovirus, respiratory syncytial virus and influenza A virus lower respiratory tract infections in hospitalized young children. The Pediatric infectious disease journal. 2006 Apr;25(4):320–324. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000207395.80657.cf. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yoshida LM, Suzuki M, Nguyen HA, et al. Respiratory syncytial virus: co-infection and paediatric lower respiratory tract infections. The European respiratory journal. 2013 Aug;42(2):461–469. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00101812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dawood FS, Chaves SS, Perez A, et al. Complications and associated bacterial coinfections among children hospitalized with seasonal or pandemic influenza, United States, 2003–2010. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2014 Mar 1;209(5):686–694. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Martinez-Roig A, Salvado M, Caballero-Rabasco MA, Sanchez-Buenavida A, Lopez-Segura N, Bonet-Alcaina M. Viral Coinfection in Childhood Respiratory Tract Infections. Archivos de bronconeumologia. 2014 Mar 22; doi: 10.1016/j.arbr.2014.11.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.De Paulis M, Gilio AE, Ferraro AA, et al. Severity of viral coinfection in hospitalized infants with respiratory syncytial virus infection. Jornal de pediatria. 2011 Jul-Aug;87(4):307–313. doi: 10.2223/JPED.2100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gagliardi TB, Paula FE, Iwamoto MA, et al. Concurrent detection of other respiratory viruses in children shedding viable human respiratory syncytial virus. Journal of medical virology. 2013 Oct;85(10):1852–1859. doi: 10.1002/jmv.23648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Echenique IA, Chan PA, Chapin KC, Andrea SB, Fava JL, Mermel LA. Clinical characteristics and outcomes in hospitalized patients with respiratory viral co-infection during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic. PloS one. 2013;8(4):e60845. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wissinger E, Goulding J, Hussell T. Immune homeostasis in the respiratory tract and its impact on heterologous infection. Seminars in immunology. 2009 Jun;21(3):147–155. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2009.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hussell T, Goulding J. Structured regulation of inflammation during respiratory viral infection. The Lancet. Infectious diseases. 2010 May;10(5):360–366. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70067-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hussell T, Godlee A, Salek-Ardakani S, Snelgrove RJ. Respiratory viral infections: knowledge based therapeutics. Current opinion in immunology. 2012 Aug;24(4):438–443. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2012.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Esper FP, Spahlinger T, Zhou L. Rate and influence of respiratory virus co-infection on pandemic (H1N1) influenza disease. The Journal of infection. 2011 Oct;63(4):260–266. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2011.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES