Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2015 Apr 1;83(6):797–805. doi: 10.1111/cen.12766

Metabolic profiling in Prader-Willi syndrome and non-syndromic obesity: sex differences and the role of growth hormone

Krystal A Irizarry a, James Bain b,c, Merlin G Butler d, Olga Ilkayeva c, Michael Muehlbauer c, Andrea M Haqq e,*, Michael Freemark a,*
PMCID: PMC4560678  NIHMSID: NIHMS670094  PMID: 25736874

Abstract

Objectives

To identify metabolic factors controlling appetite and insulin sensitivity in PWS and assess effects of GH treatment.

Methods

We compared amino acids, fatty acids, and acylcarnitines in GH-treated and untreated PWS children and obese and lean controls to identify biomarkers associated with ghrelin, peptide YY, and markers of insulin sensitivity (adiponectin and HOMA-IR).

Results

Compared with obese controls (OC), children with PWS had hyperghrelinemia, hyperadiponectinemia, hypoinsulinemia, and increased ghrelin/PYY. Hyperghrelinemia, hyperadiponectinemia, and hypoinsulinemia were more striking in PWS females than males and decreases in BCAA were detected only in PWS females. GH-treated PWS subjects had lower leptin and higher IGF-1 and adiponectin than untreated subjects; ghrelin, PYY, and insulin levels were comparable. Ghrelin correlated inversely with BCAA in PWS but not OC. Adiponectin correlated negatively with BMIz and HOMA-IR in PWS; in contrast, adiponectin correlated more strongly with BCAA than BMIz or HOMA-IR in OC.

Conclusions

BCAA levels were lower in PWS females than OC females and correlated inversely with ghrelin. Low BCAA in PWS females may promote hyperghrelinemia and hyperphagia, while hyperadiponectinemia may maintain insulin sensitivity despite excess weight gain. GH treatment may reduce leptin and increase adiponectin, but does not affect ghrelin or PYY.

Keywords: Ghrelin, Adiponectin, BCAA, fatty acid oxidation, insulin sensitivity

Introduction

Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS) is the most common genetic obesity disorder and results from lack of gene expression on paternally inherited chromosome 15q11.2-q13 (1, 2). The hallmark features of PWS include neonatal hypotonia and failure to thrive in infancy followed by hyperphagia and obesity in early childhood (3). This makes PWS a unique model for the study of appetite regulation. In addition to hyperphagia, patients with PWS have hypogonadism and short stature that are theorized to result from hypothalamic dysfunction (3). However, the factors regulating appetite and satiety in PWS are poorly understood.

Relative to age- and BMI-matched obese controls, children and adults with PWS have elevated fasting levels of ghrelin, a hormone synthesized primarily by the enteroendocrine cells of the stomach. Ghrelin circulates as acylated and desacylated forms; limited evidence suggests increases in both the acyl and desacyl forms of the hormone in children and adults with PWS (4, 5). Acylated ghrelin promotes food intake in humans (6) and fat deposition and weight gain in experimental animals (7). The orexigenic effects of ghrelin may be opposed by peptide YY, an anorexigenic hormone secreted by the L-cells of the gastrointestinal tract in response to feeding (8). Total and acyl ghrelin levels in healthy subjects fall after food intake and weight gain and rise after weight loss (9); the hyperghrelinemia of overweight PWS patients therefore seems paradoxical. Through binding to the pituitary growth-hormone secretagogue receptor (GHS-R), acyl ghrelin also stimulates GH secretion in normal weight children and adults under fasting conditions (10). The effects of ghrelin on GH secretion in obese patients are less clear (10). Ghrelin-dependent GH secretion promotes hepatic gluconeogenesis and plays a central role in the defense against hypoglycemia in states of nutrient deprivation (11, 12). The etiology of hyperghrelinemia in PWS remains unclear, but at least some affected children are hyperghrelinemic prior to the accretion of fat mass (4, 1315).

Fasting insulin levels and HOMA-IR are lower and adiponectin levels higher in children with PWS than in age and gender-matched obese controls (4, 16). HOMA-IR (17) is a measure of hepatic insulin sensitivity equal to the product of fasting blood glucose (mg/dL) and insulin (uU/ml) divided by 405. While the hypoinsulinemia, decreased HOMA-IR, and hyperadiponectinemia in PWS suggest heightened insulin sensitivity, the relative hyperghrelinemia in PWS may contribute to hyperphagia. Nevertheless the regulation of insulin, adiponectin, and ghrelin in PWS is poorly understood.

To identify metabolic determinants of adiponectin and ghrelin in PWS, we conducted a systematic study of plasma amino acids, fatty acids, and amino acid and fatty acid metabolites in GH-treated and untreated PWS children and BMI-matched obese and lean controls. We focused on amino acid and fatty acid metabolites because previous studies showed roles for BCAA in the regulation of insulin sensitivity and food intake in obese adults and adolescents (18, 19). We hypothesized that metabolic profiles in patients with PWS might account for their relative hyperghrelinemia, hyperphagia, and increased insulin sensitivity.

Methods and Procedures

Subjects

Fourteen children with genetically confirmed PWS and normal glucose tolerance were enrolled. Healthy controls were recruited from local community pediatricians and the obesity and insulin resistant clinics at Duke University Medical Center. Controls included 14 healthy children with BMI>95th percentile for age and gender (obese controls, OC) and 14 children of normal weight (lean controls, LC) of comparable age and gender. Nine PWS subjects (5 males, 4 females) were taking GH (mean 0.02mg/kg/day) during the study.

The study was approved by the Duke IRB. A parent of each child gave written informed consent; when appropriate, each child provided assent before enrollment.

Blood sample collection and processing

Blood samples were collected between 7:30–10:00 am after an observed 12-h overnight fast. Samples in EDTA-treated and serum-separator tubes were immediately treated with Aprotinin, 500 KIU/mL [Roche, Indianapolis, IN]. Serum and plasma were separated by centrifugation (1500g); all samples were aliquoted and stored at −70C until assayed.

Plasma acylcarnitines and amino acids

Proteins were removed by precipitation with methanol. The aliquoted supernatants were dried and esterified with hot, acidic methanol (acylcarnitines) or n-butanol (amino acids). Acylcarnitines and amino acids were analyzed by tandem mass spectrometry using stable isotope-labeled internal standards as previously described (11).

Free fatty acids

Individual free fatty acids were methylated with iodomethane, partially purified via solid-phase extraction, and measured by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (18, 20).

Conventional metabolite analysis

Plasma glucose, and total free fatty acids (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) were measured on a Hitachi 911 clinical analyzer.

Measurement of ghrelin, insulin, adiponectin, leptin. and PYY

Plasma insulin concentrations were measured in all groups with a two-site IRMA method (13). The intraassay and interassay CV were 3–5% and 5–7%. The normal range was 0–69.5 pmol/liter. Total and HMW adiponectin levels were measured by enzyme immunoassay (Alpco Diagnostics, Salem, NH). The intra-assay CV was 5% for total and HMW adiponectin. The interassay CV was 5% for total adiponectin and 6% for HMW adiponectin. The sensitivity was 0.075ng/ml.

Plasma ghrelin was measured with a commercial RIA (Phoenix Pharmaceuticals, Belmont, CA). The intraassay and interassay coefficients of variation (CV) were 7% and 10%, respectively. The lower and upper limits of detection for this assay were 24 and 1516 pmol/liter. Plasma leptin levels were determined using an RIA from Linco (St. Charles, MO) with detection limit 0.5 ng/ml and intraassay and interassay CV 2 and 5%, respectively. Plasma total PYY was measured by RIA (Linco); intraassay and interassay CV were 3–9% and 5–8%, respectively.

Statistical analysis

The outcome variables among the PWS, OC and LC groups were compared using analysis of variance, non-parametric Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Correlations between ghrelin, adiponectin and BMI-z, HOMA-IR, plasma amino acids, and fatty acid metabolites were determined by Spearman Rank Order Correlation. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Software, Inc, La Jolla, CA) and SigmaPlot software (Systat Software, Inc, Chicago, IL).

Results

Characteristics of the study participants are shown in Table 1. The mean age of the PWS girls was less than that of the boys and girls in the other groups, but the difference was not statistically significant. BMI z-scores were comparable between PWS and OC groups.

Table 1.

Auxologic and metabolic parameters of the three study cohorts (PWS, OC, and OC) and comparison of GH-treated (PWS + GH) and untreated PWS subjects (PWS no GH). Serum ghrelin was not measured in LC.

PWS OC LC P-
value
PWS
vs OC
P-
value
PWS
vs LC
P-value
OC vs
LC
PWS
+ GH
PWS
no GH
P-value
PWS
GH vs
PWS no
GH
N
  Male
  Female
14
9
5
14
6
8
14
8
6
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
9
5
4
5
4
1
Age (yr) 10.9±4.1 12.1±2.6 11.8±2.4 0.69 0.58 0.80 9.1±3.6 14.0±3.1 0.04
BMIz 2.1±0.8 2.2±0.6 −0.5±0.7 0.81 <0.0001 <0.0001 1.8±0.7 2.7±0.5 0.03
HOMA-IR 4.2±2.7 6.2±2.6 2.5±1.2 0.029 0.17 <0.0001 3.4±1.7 5.6±3.8 0.36
Glucose (mg/dL) 90.8±12.3 93.3±7.0 96.9±5.6 0.44 0.15 0.15 90.1±10.4 92.2±16.7 1.0
Insulin (uIU/mL) 18.9±12.4 26.4±10.2 10.4±4.3 0.029 0.09 <0.0001 15.4±8.6 25.1±16.6 0.43
IGF-1(ng/mL) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 810.6±315.6 287.6±64.9 0.001
Ghrelin (pg/ml) 1435±383.0 862.2±233.3 n/a 0.0003 n/a n/a 1478±464.9 1355±179.7 0.52
Total Adiponectin (ng/mL) 15000±9920 5842±2646 16520±5820 0.0072 0.44 <0.0001 18630±10440 8449±4278 0.11
Adiponectin HMW(ng/mL) 7771±6103 2860±2488 5802±3051 0.013 0.84 0.01 10150±6246 3486±2706 0.04
Leptin (ng/mL) 34.6±24.6 36.3±23.1 3.4±2.4 0.80 <0.0001 <0.0001 20.3±13.3 60.3±18.3 0.002
PYY (pM) 135.0±25.3 114.4±16.5 n/a 0.014 n/a n/a 128.2±26.2 147.4±20.1 0.30
Ghrelin:PYY 11.4±5.5 7.62±2.0 n/a 0.02 n/a n/a 12.6±6.5 9.4±1.9 0.52

Data are means +/− SD unless otherwise noted. n/a indicates data not available. NS indicates not statistically significant.

Baseline fasting insulin, ghrelin, adiponectin and PYY

Despite comparable BMI z-scores, the cohort of PWS subjects had lower fasting insulin levels and HOMA-IR and higher ghrelin, adiponectin (total and HMW), and peptide YY (PYY) than OC (Table 1). The ratio of ghrelin/PYY was higher in PWS than in OC. The fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, and total and high molecular weight (HMW) adiponectin levels in PWS were comparable to those in LC (Table 1), while leptin levels were markedly higher. Ghrelin was not measured in the LC cohort in this study but has previously been reported in another group of lean children (13).

Effects of gender on baseline characteristics

Important sex-dependent anthropometric and metabolic differences may be obscured when data from males and females are analyzed collectively (19). Table 2 shows auxologic and hormonal data analyzed separately in males and females. Relative hyperghrelinemia was noted in both PWS males (p=0.049) and females (p=0.002) but was more striking in PWS females than PWS males. Ghrelin levels were 2 fold higher in PWS females than OC females, but only 37% higher in PWS males than OC males. There were no gender differences in the levels of PYY among PWS males and females or OC males and females. Fasting insulin levels and HOMA-IR were lower (p=0.002) and total and HMW adiponectin levels higher (p=0.002) in PWS females than OC females and were comparable to those in LC females. In contrast, fasting insulin and HOMA-IR in PWS males were comparable to those in OC males. Total and HMW Adiponectin levels in PWS males were highly variable and did not differ significantly from those in OC or LC males. Leptin levels in female LC and OC were higher than those in LC and OC males. In contrast, leptin levels were similar in PWS females and males. Consequently, leptin levels were significantly higher in PWS males than LC males.

Table 2.

Auxologic and metabolic parameters segregated by gender. Serum ghrelin was not measured in LC.

PWS F
(n=5)
PWS M
(n=9)
OC F
(n=8)
OC M
(n=6)
LC F
(n=6)
LC M
(n=8)
Age (yr) 8.8±4.8 12.0±3.5 12.9±3.0 11.0±1.9 10.8±1.9 12.5±2.7
BMIz 1.9±0.6e 2.3±0.8g 2.4±0.2 1.8±0.7 −0.2±0.7 −0.7±0.7
HOMA-IR 2.8±0.9d 4.9±3.1 6.9±2.5 5.1±2.7 2.3±0.7 2.7±1.3
Glucose (mg/dL) 93.7±15.2 89.3±11.2 94.2±8.9 92.1±3.8 95.0±4.5 98.3±6.2
Insulin (uU/mL) 11.9±3.7d 22.8±14.1 29.4±9.0 22.4±11.1 9.8±2.7 10.8±5.4
Ghrelin (pg/mL) 1529±467.7d 1382±346.8f 753.0±137.7 1008±265.2 n/a n/a
Adiponectin (ng/mL) 16070±5575d 14400±11970 4442±1491 7709±2787 17120±7267 16070±4964
Adiponectin HMW (ng/mL) 8207±4164d 7529±7189 1506±1138b 4665±2726 7002±3637 4902±2384
Leptin (ng/mL) 34.4±28.3 34.8±24.2g 49.4±19.4b 18.8±14.7 5.3±2.8c 2.0±0.4
PYY (pM) 131.7±25.3 136.8±27.0 110.4±18.8 119.8±12.3 n/a n/a
Ghrelin:PYY 12.5±6.5 10.8±5.1 7.0±1.9 8.4±1.9 n/a n/a

Data are means +/− SD unless otherwise noted. n/a indicates data not available.

p <0.05 for a PWS Females vs PWS Males;

b

OC Females vs OC Males;

c

LC Females vs LC Males;

d

PWS Females vs OC Females;

e

PWS Females vs LC Females;

f

PWS Males vs OC Males;

g

PWS Males vs LC Males.

Plasma amino acids in PWS, OC, LC

Plasma amino acids were analyzed by group (PWS, OC and LC) and gender. The levels of Glycine, Histine, Serine, Asx (Aspartate/Asparagine), Citrulline and Arginine were lower in OC than in LC, while the levels of Tyrosine (Tyr) and Glx (Glutamate/Glutamine) were higher (Table 3). Tyr levels in PWS were lower than those in OC and comparable to those in LC; Glx levels in PWS were also lower than those in OC but higher than those in LC.

Table 3.

Amino acid levels in the three study cohorts (PWS, OC, and LC) and comparison of GH-treated (PWS + GH) and untreated PWS subjects (PWS no GH).

Amino
Acid
(µM)
PWS OC LC P-value
PWS
vs OC
P-value
PWS vs
LC
P-value
OC vs LC
PWS
+ GH
PWS
no GH
P-value
PWS
GH vs
no GH
N 14 14 14 9 3
Leu/ILE 146.4±41.0 161.1±15.1 150.1±26.8 0.23 0.83 0.15 137.1±42.3 174.3±22.7 0.10
Val 209.8±55.1 215.4±26.7 203.9±33.3 0.87 0.66 0.56 194.9±53.5 254.3±35.3 0.14
Phe 64.7±20.6 64.8±6.2 59.2±9.8 0.69 0.41 0.056 60.7±21.3 77.0±14.9 0.10
Tyr 67.9±21.7 82.4±10.9 71.1±9.3 0.03 0.48 0.0169 58.0±12.8 97.7±13.0 0.009
Gly 344.7±164.3 284.9±51.2 420.5±63.8 0.12 0.0008 <0.0001 356.4±189.3 309.3±50.7 0.72
Ala 313.9±105.2 393.5±100.2 383.0±92.7 0.13 0.14 0.81 287.1±98.8 394.3±94.1 0.21
Met 28.1±7.7 30.4±3.4 31.1±4.9 0.17 0.18 0.69 25.0±5.4 37.3±5.8 0.009
His 73.5±12.4 81.0±11.1 87.4±5.9 0.23 0.0006 0.0387 73.4±14.2 73.7±6.1 0.72
Ser 102.3±18.3 106.8±14.9 122.1±8.5 0.97 0.0013 0.0024 99.8±19.7 109.7±13.5 0.48
Pro 157.8±44.7 171.2±44.2 201.1±45.4 0.48 0.02 0.16 149.1±45.7 183.7±35.8 0.21
Asx 88.7±26.7 80.1±19.5 107.3±33.8 0.45 0.08 0.0308 82.1±27.6 108.3±9.5 0.1
Glx 130.7±43.1 172.6±43.5 85.5±38.5 0.01 0.0026 <0.0001 138.3±38.2 107.7±57.8 0.28
Orn 66.2±24.3 49.3±6.0 50.8±11.6 0.15 0.11 0.908 62.6±24.5 77.0±24.6 0.37
Cit 26.4±7.1 25.6±6.2 34.3±3.7 0.72 0.0034 0.0007 26.2±7.8 27.0±5.6 1.0
Arg 76.6±32.8 87.4±8.2 109.2±18.0 0.62 0.01 0.0023 72.6±37.4 88.7±3.5 0.86

Values are means +/− SD

To determine if amino acid levels in the various cohorts vary according to gender, we analyzed plasma amino acids separately in males and females. Table 4 demonstrates significant and differential gender effects on the levels of the BCAA Leu/Ile and Val in the three cohorts. The levels of Leu/Ile were higher in LC males than in LC females. However, levels of Leu/Ile were higher in OC females than in LC females and were comparable to those in OC males. Interestingly, the levels in Leu/Ile in PWS females were comparable to those in LC females and lower than those in OC females. Likewise, Val levels in PWS females were lower than those in PWS males.

Table 4.

Amino acid levels analyzed by gender.

Amino
Acid
(µM)
PWS F PWS M OC F OC M LC F LC M
N 5 9 8 6 6 8
Leu/ILE 116.0±36.9a,d 168.1±29.2 164.8±13.6 156.2±16.9 133.2±18.8c 162.8±25.5
Val 167.8±51.2a 239.7±36.1 220.5±34.7 208.5±8.9 190.2±32.8 214.1±31.7
Phe 51.8±12.6a 74.0±20.8g 62.9±2.2 67.3±8.9 58.2±11.1 60.0±9.5
Tyr 55.4±19.6d 76.9±19.7 83.0±10.8 81.7±12.0 70.8±9.9 71.4±9.4
Gly 397.4±258.5 307.0±30.7g 298.4±56.4 266.8±40.9 422.8±507.6 418.8±75.5
Ala 247.8±85.0a,,d,e 361.1±96.0 421.4±120.8 356.3±52.5 421.0±61.9 354.5±105.2
Met 23.8±7.3d,e 31.1±6.8 32.1±2.9b 28.2±2.9 32.7±5.9 30.0±4.2
His 69.0±17.1e 76.7±7.5g 84.4±12.5 76.5±7.8 86.5±6.3 88.1±5.9
Ser 97.1±27.1 105.6±9.6g 111.3±17.7 100.8±8.3 125.5±10.4 119.6±6.2
Pro 127.4±26.1d,e 179.4±43.5 188.9±43.3 147.7±35.9 205.3±49.0 197.9±45.6
Asx 75.4±25.2e 98.1±25.2 85.8±23.1 72.7±11.4 119.0±26.6 98.5±37.5
Glx 146.4±44.7d,e 119.4±41.5 172.1±29.9 173.3±60.5 76.2±14.6 92.5±49.8
Orn 73.6±27.4 60.9±22.4 49.8±5.7 48.7±7.0 49.7±13.8 51.6±10.5
Cit 25.8±10.0 26.9±4.9g 23.1±5.7 29.0±5.6 33.2±2.7 35.1±4.4
Arg 53.8±23.6a,d,e 92.9±29.2 86.9±8.1 88.2±9.1 110.0±17.3 108.6±19.8

Values are means +/− SD.

p <0.05 for a PWS Females vs PWS Males;

b

OC Females vs OC Males;

c

LC Females vs LC Males;

d

PWS Females vs OC Females;

e

PWS Females vs LC Females;

f

PWS Males vs OC Males;

g

PWS Males vs LC Males.

In contrast to Leu/Ile, the levels of Glx were lower in both PWS males and females than in OC males and females. Glx levels in PWS were comparable to those in LC males, while Glx levels in PWS females were higher than those in LC females.

Tyr levels in the PWS cohort were lower than those in OC and LC (Table 3). This reflects the low levels of Tyr in PWS females but not males (Table 4). Alanine, methionine, proline, and arginine levels were also lower in PWS females than OC and LC females.

Free fatty acids

The levels of various free fatty acids in PWS were compared to those in OC and LC (Supplemental Table 1). Most striking were the high levels of C16:1 Palmitoleic acid in PWS and of C18:3 alpha-Linolenic acid in PWS and OC. Relative to LC, PWS also had higher levels of myristic, palmitic, and linoleic acids while OC had higher arachidonic acid levels. However, there were no significant differences between the PWS and OC groups in levels of any free fatty acids. Interestingly, unlike the levels of BCAA, the levels of fatty acids in PWS did not vary in either a gender-dependent (Supplemental Table 2) or GH-dependent manner (Supplemental Table 3).

Acylcarnitines

Byproducts of BCAA (and methionine) catabolism include propionyl-L-carnitine (C3) and valeryl-L-carnitine (C5); in contrast, acetylcarnitine (C2) is an end product of fatty acid oxidation. Relative to LC, OC had lower levels of C2 (acetyl) carnitine (Supplemental Table 4). In contrast, C2 levels in PWS were comparable to those in LC. C2 levels in PWS appeared to be independent of gender or GH therapy (Supplemental Tables 5 and 6).

There were no significant differences in C3 or C5 acylcarnitines among the groups but the ratio of the sum of C3+C5 to the sum of acylcarnitines was higher in PWS and OC than LC. This ratio was selectively higher in PWS males and OC males and was not influenced by GH treatment (Supplemental Tables 5 and 6). Collectively, these findings may suggest lower rates of complete fatty acid oxidation in OC, preservation of complete fatty oxidation in PWS, and increased rates of BCAA and methionine catabolism in PWS and OC relative to LC.

Effect of GH treatment on auxologic parameters, hormones and adipocytokines

Nine of 14 PWS subjects were treated with GH. A comparison of GH-treated and untreated PWS subjects is shown in Table 1. PWS subjects treated with GH (5 males, 4 females) were younger in age (mean 9.11 vs 14.0 years) than untreated PWS subjects (4 males, 1 female) and had lower BMI-z. However, fasting glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR, ghrelin, and PYY were comparable. These findings suggest that the relative hypoinsulinemia, hyperghrelinemia, elevated PYY, and increased ghrelin/PYY do not result from GH treatment. There was considerable variability in the total adiponectin levels in both the GH-treated and untreated patients. While the GH-treated had higher mean levels of adiponectin levels, the difference was not statistically significant. On the other hand, PWS subjects treated with GH had increased levels of HMW adiponectin (p=0.04). IGF-1 levels were higher (p=0.001) and leptin levels were lower in GH-treated subjects (p=0.002).

Effects of GH on plasma amino acids

We considered the possibility that differences in amino acid levels in PWS might be related to GH therapy. PWS children treated with GH (5 males, 4 females) had lower levels of Tyr (p=0.009) and Met (p=0.009) than untreated PWS (2 males, 1 female) (Table 3). Table 5 demonstrates that the levels of BCAA (p=0.016) and Tyr (p=0.032) were lower in GH-treated PWS females (n=4) than in GH-treated PWS males (n=5). These findings suggest that GH may exert differential effects on amino acids in male and female patients with PWS; alternatively, the sex differences in amino acids may be independent of GH therapy.

Table 5.

Comparison of metabolic profiles in GH-treated PWS males (M) and females (F).

PWS F
GH Treated
PWS M
GH Treated
GH F vs
GH M (p)
N 4 5
Age (yr) 7.2±1.8 11.4±3.7 0.111
BMI-z 1.7±0.7 1.8±0.8 0.905
HOMA-IR 2.8±1.1 3.8±1.9 0.555
Glucose (mg/dL) 88.1±9.9 91.7±11.6 0.730
Insulin (µUI/mL) 12.5±3.9 17.8±10.9 0.905
IGF-1 (ng/mL) 628±181.7 956.7±338.4 0.190
Serum ghrelin (ng/L) 1637±462.2 1351±476.0 0.555
Serum adiponectin (ng/mL) 16930±6050 20000±13620 0.730
Adiponectin HMW (ng/mL) 8946±4413 11120±7798 0.90
Leptin (ng/mL) 23.2±15.4 18.1±12.6 0.555
PYY (pM) 125.4±22.8 130.3±31.1 0.730
Ghrelin:PYY 13.4±6.7 11.6±6.9 0.55
Leu/ILE (µM) 103.5±27.8 164±31.2 0.0159
Val (µM) 147.5±27.4 232.8±33.6 0.0159
Phe (µM) 48.3±11.3 70.6±23.1 0.063
Tyr (µM) 48.0±12.1 66.0±6.3 0.0317
Gly (µM) 413.3±295.7 311±16.8 1.00
Ala (µM) 237.8±94.7 326.6±91.8 0.190
Met (µM) 21.2±5.2 28±3.7 0.063
His (µM) 66.5±18.7 79±7.3 0.4127
Ser (µM) 91.3±26.7 106.6±10.4 0.555
Pro (µM) 118±17.8 174±46.8 0.111
Asx (µM) 69.5±24.8 92.2±27.9 0.413
Glx (µM) 139.5±48.4 137.4±33.9 1.00
Orn (µM) 70.3±30.4 56.4±20.0 0.286
Cit (µM) 24.3±10.8 27.8±5.2 0.555
Arg (µM) 46±18.4 93.8±35.8 0.111

Values are means +/− SD

Auxologic and metabolic correlates of ghrelin and adiponectin

In PWS subjects, ghrelin correlated inversely with BMI-z (r=−0.59, p=0.027), HOMA-IR (r=−0.55, p=0.042), and the levels of Leu/Ile and Val (r=−0.629, p=0.028 and r=−0.629, p=0.028, respectively). In OCs, ghrelin correlated inversely with BMIz (r=−0.59, p=0.029) and HOMA-IR (−0.53, p=0.049), but not with Leu/Ile or Val (r=−0.32, p=0.266 and r=0.12, p=0.673, respectively, Supplemental Table 7, Figure 1). Adiponectin correlated negatively with Leu/Ile and Val in OC (r=−0.62, p=0.017); r=−0.50, p=0.06, respectively); in contrast, adiponectin correlated inversely with BMIz and HOMA-IR in PWS (r=−0.61, p=0.019 and r=−0.78, p=0.0009, respectively, Supplemental Table 7, Figure 1). The inverse correlation between adiponectin and HOMA-IR in PWS was strengthened by natural log transformation of the data (Figure 1f). The most powerful determinants of ghrelin in PWS were the levels of BCAA, while the most powerful determinants of ghrelin in OC were BMIz and HOMA-IR. Conversely, the strongest determinants of adiponectin in PWS were BMIz and HOMA-IR, but the strongest determinants of adiponectin in OC were the levels of Leu/Ile and Val (Supplemental Table 7).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Correlation of Ghrelin and Adiponectin with auxologic and metabolic parameters in PWS subjects. (a–d): relationship of fasted ghrelin in PWS subjects to: (a) BMI-z; (b) HOMA-IR; and (c, d) branch-chain amino acids. (e–h): relationship of fasted adiponectin levels in PWS subjects to: (e) BMI-z; (f) HOMA-IR; and (g, h) branch chain amino acids. The data in 1f are natural log transformed.

Discussion

“Exogenous” obesity is associated with hypoghrelinemia, hypoadiponectinemia, insulin resistance, and compensatory hyperinsulinemia. In contrast, PWS combines hyperghrelinemia, hyperphagia, and obesity with relative hyperadiponectinemia and hypoinsulinemia. The factors accounting for the metabolic differences between patients with PWS and exogenous obesity are unclear. Here we report striking differences in amino acids, fatty acids, and amino acid and fatty acid metabolites among male and female PWS and OC children and differential regulation of ghrelin and adiponectin by BMIz, HOMA-IR and the BCAA. We speculate that these metabolic differences may reflect, or contribute to, the relative hyperghrelinemia, hyperadiponectinemia, and hypoinsulinemia of PWS and may therefore play roles in the development and/or progression of hyperphagia and weight gain and the maintenance of insulin sensitivity.

Numerous studies from our group and others find that ghrelin levels in PWS are higher than those in age- and BMI-matched OC (4, 13, 14, 21). In contrast, the relative levels of PYY in PWS are more variable (16, 21, 22). We found that PYY levels are mildly elevated in PWS; however, the ratio of ghrelin/PYY, which may be considered a marker of orexigenic drive, is also high. This is primarily driven by the higher levels of ghrelin in PWS. Interestingly, while ghrelin and PYY levels were comparable in PWS males and females, the relative hypoinsulinemia and hyperadiponectinemia of PWS are more characteristic of females than males. Likewise, Leu/Ile, Val, Tyr, Met, Ala, Glx, and Arg levels are lower in PWS females than either PWS males or OC females and (with the exception of Glx) are comparable to those in LC females. In contrast, the levels of BCAA and various other amino acids in PWS males are comparable to those in OC males; the major exception is Glx, which is lower in PWS males than in OC males.

In a previous investigation (19), we found that BCAA levels in healthy obese adolescent males were higher than in obese adolescent females. The teenagers were older in that study (mean age 14 yr) than in the current study and their BCAA levels were significantly higher. In the current study BCAA levels are higher in LC males than LC females. Our study shows that the sex differences in BCAA levels observed in LC are abolished in “exogenous” obesity, but preserved in children with PWS. Interestingly, the levels of fatty acids and acylcarnitines do not differ significantly between PWS boys and girls. Factors that may contribute to these variable sex-dependent metabolic differences among PWS, OC and LC children are unclear but could include variations in sex steroid and GH production, fat distribution, lean body mass, and/or autonomic function (19, 2325). In particular, the effects of differential fat distribution may be a determining factor in the unique metabolic profile of PWS. Prior studies have shown that visceral fat stores are lower in PWS females than in OC females; the reduction in visceral fat is associated with lower levels of insulin and HOMA-IR. In contrast, subcutaneous fat stores in PWS females are comparable to those in OC females (25). It should be noted the PWS females were younger than PWS males. Previous studies showed that HOMA-IR levels in normal weight pre-pubertal children are lower than those in older children (26); therefore, age or pubertal development may have impacted our results.

In theory, the metabolic differences between PWS and OC may reflect, or may contribute to, the development or progression of, certain clinical features of PWS. For example, the major determinants of ghrelin in PWS were the levels of BCAAs, while the most powerful determinants of ghrelin in OC were BMIz and HOMA-IR. Conversely, the strongest determinants of adiponectin in PWS were BMIz and HOMA-IR, but the strongest determinants of adiponectin in OC were the levels of Leu/Ile and Val. Since leucine administration decreases food intake in rodents and humans (27, 28), we speculate that low levels of BCAA in PWS females may promote or facilitate their hyperghrelinemia and hyperphagia. Low levels of leucine might also reduce mTOR signaling and thereby increase insulin sensitivity, particularly in PWS females (29). The relative insulin hypersensitivity of PWS may also be maintained by high levels of adiponectin, which increases hepatic insulin sensitivity and fatty acid oxidation (16, 24, 25). This may explain why C2 (acetyl) carnitine levels in PWS are comparable to those in LC and higher than those in OC. An increase in the ratio of [C3+C5] to sum of acylcarnitines might be a marker for proteolysis and/or amino acid catabolism in PWS males, predisposing to sarcopenia.

A previous investigation showed lower levels of glutamine and higher levels of glutamic acid in PWS relative to obese controls but no differences in the levels of BCAA or Tyr (30). However, that study did not analyze the role of gender and was conducted in young adults prior to the advent of growth hormone therapy. While the effects of GH on growth and body composition in PWS are well-established (31, 32), the effects of the hormone on metabolic function have not been studied extensively. Here we show that the levels of hormones and metabolites in PWS children are modulated by GH therapy. We found that GH treatment was associated with lower BMI Z-score, lower leptin, higher IGF-1, and higher levels of HMW adiponectin (p=0.04). These findings are consistent with studies showing that GH increases linear growth and reduces body fat stores in PWS (33, 34). A reduction in body fat stores, reflected in the fall in leptin levels, may explain in part the increases in HMW adiponectin observed in GH-treated subjects (16, 35). On the other hand, GH treatment of PWS patients had no effect on fasting insulin, ghrelin, PYY, free fatty acids, or acylcarnitines.

The levels of Leu/Ile, Val, and Tyr were lower in GH-treated PWS females than in GH-treated PWS males. Interestingly, a previous investigation showed that acute administration of GH to healthy young men reduced plasma Tyr, Ile and Val levels during a 7 hour infusion period (36). GH therapy may selectively reduce the levels of BCAA and Tyr in PWS girls; alternatively, low BCAA and Tyr levels may be characteristic of PWS females and independent of GH treatment.

Limitations of our study include multiple comparisons of cross-sectional data collected at a single point in time and analysis of total ghrelin rather than active and desacyl ghrelin. Our study included a small number of subjects treated with GH, possibly limiting our ability to assess adequately the effects of GH on metabolic function. Moreover, the roles of dietary intake and macronutrient preference on metabolic function were not explored. Despite these limitations, our study compared a relatively large cohort (for a rare genetic disorder) of children with PWS with comparable groups of OC and LC.

Despite the relative insulin sensitivity of PWS subjects, their morbid obesity places them at risk of metabolic sequelae including type 2 diabetes (25). Future work on adiponectin analogues or other therapies aimed at up-regulation of adiponectin receptors may prove clinically useful in limiting the metabolic sequelae of obesity, including insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, and metabolic syndrome.

Supplementary Material

Supp TableS1-S7

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Juanita Cuffee and Christopher Newgard. Supported by grants from NIH T32 HD 43029-11A1 (KI), David and Cynthia King Pediatric Endocrine Fellowship Fund (KI, MF), Canadian Institutes of Health Research (AMH), and Foundation for Prader Willi Research (MF, AMH).

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

BCAA

Branch Chain Amino Acids

Leu

Leucine

Ile

Isoleucine

Val

Valine

HOMA-IR

Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance

GH

Growth Hormone

IGF-1

Insulin-like Growth Factor 1

PYY

Peptide YY

HMW – Adiponectin

High Molecular Weight Adiponectin

PWS

Prader Willi Syndrome

OC

Obese Control

LC

Lean Control

Footnotes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors have nothing to disclose.

References

  • 1.Cassidy SB, Dykens E, Williams CA. Prader-Willi and Angelman Syndromes: Sister Imprinted Disorders. Am J Med Gen. 2000;97:137–146. doi: 10.1002/1096-8628(200022)97:2<136::aid-ajmg5>3.0.co;2-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Butler MG. Prader-Willi syndrome: obesity due to genomic imprinting. Current Genomics. 2011;12:204–215. doi: 10.2174/138920211795677877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Emerick J, Vogt K. Endocrine manifestations and management of Prader-Willi syndrome. International Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology. 2013;2013(1):14. doi: 10.1186/1687-9856-2013-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Haqq AM, Grambow SC, Muehlbauer M, Newgard CB, Svetkey LP, Carrel AL, et al. Ghrelin concentrations in Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS) infants and children: changes during development. Clinical Endocrinology. 2008;69(6):911–920. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03385.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Prodam F, Monzani A, Ricotti R, Marolda A, Bellone S, Aimaretti G, et al. Systematic Review of Ghrelin Response to Food Intake in Pediatric Age, From Neonates to Adolescents. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2014;99(5):1556–1568. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-4010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wren AM, Seal LJ, Cohen MA, Brynes AE, Frost GS, Murphy KG, et al. Ghrelin Enhances Appetite and Increases Food Intake in Humans. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2001;86(12) doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.12.8111. 5992-. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tschop M, Smiley DL, Heiman ML. Ghrelin induces adiposity in rodents. Nature. 2000;407(6806):908–913. doi: 10.1038/35038090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Batterham RL, Bloom SR. The Gut Hormone Peptide YY Regulates Appetite. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2003;994(1):162–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb03176.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Stock S, Leichner P, Wong ACK, Ghatei MA, Kieffer TJ, Bloom SR, et al. Ghrelin, Peptide YY, Glucose-Dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide, and Hunger Responses to a Mixed Meal in Anorexic, Obese, and Control Female Adolescents. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2005;90(4):2161–2168. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-1251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nass R, Gaylinn BD, Thorner MO. The role of ghrelin in GH secretion and GH disorders. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. 2011;340(1):10–14. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2011.03.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bartz S, Mody A, Hornik C, Bain J, Muehlbauer M, Kiyimba T, et al. Severe Acute Malnutrition in Childhood: Hormonal and Metabolic Status at Presentation, Response to Treatment, and Predictors of Mortality. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2014;99(6):2128–2137. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-4018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Li RL, Sherbet DP, Elsbernd BL, Goldstein JL, Brown MS, Zhao T-J. Profound Hypoglycemia in Starved, Ghrelin-deficient Mice Is Caused by Decreased Gluconeogenesis and Reversed by Lactate or Fatty Acids. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2012;287(22):17942–17950. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.358051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Haqq AM, Farooqi IS, O’Rahilly S, Stadler DD, Rosenfeld RG, Pratt KL, et al. Serum Ghrelin Levels Are Inversely Correlated with Body Mass Index, Age, Insulin Concentrations in Normal Children and Are Markedly Increased in Prader-Willi Syndrome. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2003;88(1):174–178. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-021052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Feigerlová E, Diene G, Conte-Auriol F, Molinas C, Gennero I, Salles J-P, et al. Hyperghrelinemia Precedes Obesity in Prader-Willi Syndrome. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2008;93(7):2800–2805. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-2138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kweh FA, Miller JL, Sulsona CR, Wasserfall C, Atkinson M, Shuster JJ, et al. Hyperghrelinemia in Prader-Willi syndrome begins in early infancy long before the onset of hyperphagia. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A. 2014 doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36810. n/a-n/a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Haqq AM, Muehlbauer M, Svetkey LP, Newgard CB, Purnell JQ, Grambow SC, et al. Altered distribution of adiponectin isoforms in children with Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS): association with insulin sensitivity and circulating satiety peptide hormones. Clinical Endocrinology. 2007;67(6):944–951. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.02991.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Muniyappa R, Lee S, Chen H, Quon MJ. Current approaches for assessing insulin sensitivity and resistance in vivo: advantages, limitations, and appropriate usage. American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2008;294(1):E15–E26. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00645.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Newgard CB, An J, Bain JR, Muehlbauer MJ, Stevens RD, Lien LF, et al. A Branched-Chain Amino Acid-Related Metabolic Signature that Differentiates Obese and Lean Humans and Contributes to Insulin Resistance. Cell Metabolism. 2009;9(4):311–326. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2009.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Newbern D, Gumus Balikcioglu P, Balikcioglu M, Bain J, Muehlbauer M, Stevens R, et al. Sex differences in biomarkers associated with insulin resistance in obese adolescents: metabolomic profiling and principal components analysis. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2014;0(0):jc.2014–jc.2080. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-2080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Patterson BW, Zhao G, Elias N, Hachey DL, Klein S. Validation of a new procedure to determine plasma fatty acid concentration and isotopic enrichment. Journal of Lipid Research. 1999;40:2118–2124. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Goldstone AP, Patterson M, Kalingag N, Ghatei MA, Brynes AE, Bloom SR, et al. Fasting and Postprandial Hyperghrelinemia in Prader-Willi Syndrome Is Partially Explained by Hypoinsulinemia, and Is Not Due to Peptide YY3–36 Deficiency or Seen in Hypothalamic Obesity Due to Craniopharyngioma. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2005;90(5):2681–2690. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-032209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Butler MG, Bittell DC, Talebizadeh Z. Plasma peptide YY and ghrelin levels in infants and children with Prader-Willi syndrome. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2004;17(9):1177–1184. doi: 10.1515/jpem.2004.17.9.1177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Haqq AM, Muehlbauer MJ, Newgard CB, Grambow S, Freemark M. The Metabolic Phenotype of Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS) in Childhood: Heightened Insulin Sensitivity Relative to Body Mass Index. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2011;96(1):E225–E232. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-1733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Haqq AM, DeLorey DS, Sharma AA, Freemark M, Kreier F, Mackenzie ML, et al. Autonomic nervous system dysfunction in obesity and Prader-Willi syndrome: current evidence and implications for future obesity therapies. Clinical Obesity. 2012;1:175–183. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-8111.2012.00032.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Goldstone AP, Thomas EL, Brynes AE, Bell JD, Frost G, Saeed N, et al. Visceral Adipose Tissue and Metabolic Complications of Obesity Are Reduced in Prader-Willi Syndrome Female Adults: Evidence for Novel Influences on Body Fat Distribution. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2001;86(9):4330–4338. doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.9.7814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Peplies J, Jimenez-Pavon D, Savva SC, Buck C, Gunther K, Fraterman A, et al. Percentiles of fasting serum insulin, glucose, HbA1c and HOMA-IR in pre-pubertal normal weight European children from the IDEFICS cohort. Int J Obes. 2014;38(S2):S39–S47. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2014.134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Laeger T, Reed SD, Henagan TM, Fernandez DH, Taghavi M, Addington A, et al. Leucine acts in the brain to suppress food intake but does not function as a physiological signal of low dietary protein. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2014;307(3):R310–R320. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00116.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Drgonova J, Jacobsson JA, Han JC, Yanovski JA, Fredriksson R, Marcus C, et al. Involvement of the Neutral Amino Acid Transporter SLC6A15 and Leucine in Obesity-Related Phenotypes. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(9):e68245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tai ES, Tan MLS, Stevens RD, Low YL, Muehlbauer MJ, Goh DLM, et al. Insulin resistance is associated with a metabolic profile of altered protein metabolism in Chinese and Asian-Indian men. Diabetologia. 2010;53(4):757–767. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1637-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Butler MG, Murrell JE, Greene HL. Amino acid levels in Prader-Willi syndrome and obese individuals. Dysmorphology and clinical genetics. 1990;4(1):18–22. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Deal CL, Tony M, Höybye C, Allen DB, Tauber M, Christiansen JS, et al. Growth Hormone Research Society Workshop Summary: Consensus Guidelines for Recombinant Human Growth Hormone Therapy in Prader-Willi Syndrome. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2013;98(6):E1072–E1087. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-3888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kuromaru R, Kohno H, Ueyama N, Hassan HMS, Honda S, Hara T. Long-Term Effect of Growth Hormone (GH) Treatment on Body Composition in Children with GH Deficiency. Endocrine Journal. 1999;46(Suppl):S35–S38. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.46.suppl_s35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Aycan Z, Baş VN. Prader-Willi Syndrome and Growth Hormone Deficiency. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2014;6(2):62–67. doi: 10.4274/jcrpe.1228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Feigerlová E, Diene G, Oliver I, Gennero I, Salles J-P, Arnaud C, et al. Elevated Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Values in Children with Prader-Willi Syndrome Compared with Growth Hormone (GH) Deficiency Children over Two Years of GH Treatment. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2010;95(10):4600–4608. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-1831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lara-Castro C, Luo N, Wallace P, Klein RL, Garvey WT. Adiponectin Multimeric Complexes and the Metabolic Syndrome Trait Cluster. Diabetes. 2006;55(1):249–259. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Copeland KC, Nair KS. Acute growth hormone effects on amino acid and lipid metabolism. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 1994;78(5):1040–1047. doi: 10.1210/jcem.78.5.8175957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supp TableS1-S7

RESOURCES