TABLE I.
Comparison of different droplet generation methods.
| Droplet generation technology | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Microfluidic method | 1. High throughput (1 k–87 kHz, 1–8 channels) | 1. Difficult to isolate single droplet, no position control |
| 2. Large liquid viscosity range | 2. Dedicate fabrication of chip | |
| 3. Control of droplet volume | ||
| 4. Low dead volume | ||
| 5. Good biocompatibility | ||
| Commercial DOD inkjet printing | 1. High throughput (1 k–20 k Hz, 3–6 channels) | 1. Low biocompatibility for thermal inkjet printing |
| 2. Direct operation on single droplet with position/composition control | 2. High cost of cartridge, need of wash | |
| 3. Limited viscosity range (dynamic viscosity: 2–30 cp for DMP; less than 20 cp for Microfab) | ||
| 4. Large dead volume | ||
| Piezoelectric microfluidic impact printing | 1. Multiple channels expandability (4–12 channels) | 1. Low frequency: less than 200 Hz |
| 2. Direct operation on single droplet with position/composition control | 2. Limited viscosity range (dynamic viscosity < 14 cp) | |
| 3. Low-cost and disposable cartridge | ||
| 4. Control of droplet volume | ||
| 5. Low dead volume | ||
| 6. Good biocompatibility |