Abstract
Cell cycle regulation through the manipulation of endogenous membrane potentials offers tremendous opportunities to control cellular processes during tissue repair and cancer formation. However, the molecular mechanisms by which biophysical signals modulate the cell cycle remain underappreciated and poorly understood. Cells in complex organisms generate and maintain a constant voltage gradient across the plasma membrane known as the transmembrane potential. This potential, generated through the combined efforts of various ion transporters, pumps and channels, is known to drive a wide range of cellular processes such as cellular proliferation, migration and tissue regeneration while its deregulation can lead to tumorigenesis. These cellular regulatory events, coordinated by ionic flow, correspond to a new and exciting field termed molecular bioelectricity. We aim to present a brief discussion on the biophysical machinery involving membrane potential and the mechanisms mediating cell cycle progression and cancer transformation. Furthermore, we present the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea as a tractable model system for understanding principles behind molecular bioelectricity at both the cellular and organismal level.
Keywords: membrane potential, cell cycle, cancer, stem cells, planarians
1. Introduction
Efficient cellular communication is critical for the survival and perpetuation of multicellular organisms. However, the mechanism by which crosstalk among cells is translated into coordinated behavior at both the cellular and organismal level remains poorly understood. A primitive mode of cellular communication relies on the exchange of ions between the intracellular and extracellular environment. Membrane proteins facilitate the transport of ions from one side of the plasma membrane to the other. The transport of ions is essential for the establishment of electrochemical gradients which influence the behavior of both local and distant cells in the body. For instance, the manipulation of endogenous ionic flows are able to alter patterns of cell division, migration and differentiation in a wide range of embryonic and adult stem cells of vertebrate and invertebrate models [1–4]. Although the characterization of such bioelectrical phenomena is well established, very little is known about how endogenous electric fields actually affect biological functions and the mechanism through which cells respond to their influence. Nonetheless, recent findings provide compelling evidence regarding the potential of controlling this powerful ionic flow communication system to induce regeneration of missing tissues and to stimulate, or control abnormal cell behavior observed in cancer [5–9]. This new field of research, defined as “Molecular Bioelectricity”, aims to understand how voltage gradients in nonexcitable cells coordinate morphogenesis, tissue development, repair, and cancer formation [10].
Pharmacological manipulation of ionic flow provides relatively easy access to regulatory properties of cell cycle parameters [9, 11, 12]. We aim to offer information on the different ionic and voltage dependent variables that modulate the cell cycle during tissue regeneration, cellular turnover and cancer formation from previous research. These voltage gradients are not limited to cells, but also exist at the tissue/organ level, where they provide instructive information for specifying organ identity and large-scale anatomical order [1, 10, 13]. Therefore, it is essential to address the role of endogenous currents in the context of the whole organism. We propose the extremely versatile planarian model system Schmidtea mediterranea as a venue for exploring bioelectrical regulation at both the cellular and the organismal level to better understand the role of voltage gradients in adult tissue maintenance, repair and tumorigenesis.
2. The Transmembrane Potential (TMP)
All cells generate long-term, steady-state voltage gradients known as transmembrane potentials (TMPs) [3, 8, 14]. TMP is an ancient and evolutionarily conserved system that can be found in a variety of organisms, ranging from plants to higher vertebrates, and has been reviewed extensively [1–3, 10, 15, 16]. It is generated by a separation of charge across the plasma membrane, leading to a negative voltage difference in respect to the extracellular environment [11, 15]. However, gradient changes involved in generating TMPs are much slower and vastly different than the rapid membrane depolarizations observed in both nervous and muscle tissues [3, 8]. However, similar to action potentials, TMP changes in a single cell can be transmitted over long distances via gap junction linkages [14, 17–19]. TMPs are primarily maintained by the constant activity of various ion channels, pumps and transporters, collectively known as ion transport mechanisms (ITMs). These ITMs segregate charges across the plasma membrane and produce necessary current needed to generate a voltage potential [20]. An ITM of extreme importance to living systems is the sodium/potassium ATPase (Na+/K+ ATPase), which is essential for maintaining the transmembrane potential between 10 to −90 mV, depending on the tissue type [15]. The cell invests substantial amounts of energy to maintain TMP as changes in membrane polarity are used to drive alterations in cell behavior [14, 15]. We will now explore the role bioelectric regulation of one such aspect, proliferation.
3. TMP and Cell Cycle Regulation
The cell cycle is regulated by a complex array of signals stemming from the microenvironment as well as from intracellular signals such as cyclins, cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), CDK inhibitors and the retinoblastoma (Rb) protein. Factors associated with ionic flow (i.e. ITMs), membrane potential, and membrane composition are known to be involved in regulating these cell cycle components [21–25]. Exciting new results in this area unveil powerful strategies to control the cell cycle, that may enhance genetic and biochemical interventions in regenerative medicine and cancer therapy [11, 12]. We will discuss some of the bioelectrical mechanisms and properties known to modulate the cell cycle in vertebrates and invertebrates.
3.1. TMP and Membrane Polarization
Eukaryotic vacuolar-type H+-ATPases (V-ATPase) are electrogenic proton pumps that energize both the intracellular and plasma membranes by expelling H+, changing pH levels in the extracellular environment, which contribute to the maintenance of the TMP [26, 27]. As intracellular pH recovers, membrane potential becomes more negative in charge, causing plasma membrane to hyperpolarize [28]. These fluctuations in TMP are particularly evident during cell cycle progression, as demonstrated in Chinese hamster lung cells [29]. During the G0/G1 transition checkpoint, there is a gradual transition of TMP from a state of intermediate depolarization to intermediate hyperpolarization. As the cell passes through the G1/S phase transition checkpoint, the TMP becomes more negative, marking the hyperpolarization of the cell membrane. During the transition through the S phase, S/G2 checkpoint and G2 phase the membrane potential is at a maximum negative voltage and remains hyperpolarized. Entering mitosis, TMP rapidly depolarizes to the lowest minimum voltage, indicating the completion of cell division (Figure 1A) [29]. Furthermore, these fluctuations in TMP are well documented in other cell types [21–25]. These findings support the notion that TMP fluctuations through V-ATPase are an important regulatory component for ionic flow during the cell cycle and its deregulation may be associated with abnormal cell behavior.
Figure 1. a. Cell cycle modulation via transmembrane potentials, ionic gradients and gene expression.
(A) Depicts the phases of cellular polarization and the regulatory checkpoints in gene expression throughout the cell cycle. M phase is a depolarized state (red), S phase is a hyperpolarized state (teal) and G0,G1 and G2 states oscillate through intermediated phases of depolarization and hyperpolarization (yellow and green). (B) Shows physical characteristics of the cell membrane and oscillation of both gene expression and ionic concentrations during cell cycle progression. The fluctuations in microviscosity /cholesterol to phospholipids ratio (purple). Transmembrane potential/membrane fluidity (blue). pRb gene expression (---) and ionic concentrations of Cl- (yellow square). Ca2+ (grey rectangle) and Na+:K+ ratio (blue hexagon) are seen to fluctuate in terms of arbitrary values throughout the cell cycle.
3.2. Generation of TMP and Ionic Flow
Transient depolarization and hyperpolarization of the plasma membrane is mediated by the constant exchange of charged ions between the cytoplasm and extracellular environments. The V-ATPase proton pump is seen to energize the membrane through ionic gradients whereas Na+/K+ ATPases participate in maintaining the chemical gradient [30]. However, the flow of potassium ions via K+ channels eventually aids in the establishment of TMP. Inhibition of the V-ATPase reduces the proton gradient within the cell, leading to impairment of both the ionic driving force and ionic homeostasis needed for cell proliferation [31]. As intracellular concentrations of Na+ decrease, a concurrent influx of K+ ions is seen, promoting an increase in TMP. Though low in concentration, Cl- ions also play an important role throughout the cell cycle. This interplay between fluctuating states of membrane polarization and ionic flows serves as a regulator of cell cycle and cellular proliferation (Figure 1B) [5, 11, 22, 32]
3.2.1 Chloride Dynamics
Due to nature of electrogenic V-ATPases, a parallel ion conductance must occur to aid in pH regulation and driving membrane potentials. The flux of Cl- occurs in parallel to H+ flux via V-ATPase activity and is required to maintain cellular electroneutrality [33, 34]. In yeast cells, inhibition of V-ATPase strongly reduces CI- concentration in both the vacuolar and plasma membrane [35].
Compression and swelling of a cell during the cell cycle has been attributed to a Cl-/K+ relationship, required to gather essential amino acids, metabolic substrates and materials for the synthesis of proteins [36, 37]. Isotonic Cl- currents in the cell cycle have been found to regulate cell volume and membrane potential [38–40]. Studies in cancer cells indicate that volume activated Cl- channels can act as regulators of cell cycle progression [41]. They show that although there is low expression of CI-currents in the G0 phase [37], it reaches a maximum threshold in the G0/G1 and G1/S transition phases [36], reduce in the S phase and back up during the G2/M transition [42, 43]. These fluctuation of Cl- currents are not isolated events, but rather correlate with the concentrations of cyclin/CDKs and CDK inhibitors throughout the cell cycle [44]. In various cell types, a decrease in intracellular Cl- concentrations during the cell cycle reduces the rate of cellular proliferation through the upregulation of p21 and CDK inhibitors; therefore, causing a downstream effect on Cdk2 and Rb expression, halting cells in the G0/G1 transition phase [37, 41, 45–49]. Inducing expression of a hyperpolarizing anion channel such as CLIC1 in normal cells, in the vicinity of tumors, inhibits their growth. This process occurs through the upregulation of HDAC1, an acetylating protein that in Xenopus embryos, is critical for cell cycle progression and rate of cellular proliferation [5, 6]. This further supports that the precise maintenance of TMP and the voltage gradient via charged ions is key for cell cycle regulation.
3.2.2 Sodium and Potassium Dynamics
The efflux of H+ by the Na+/H+ transporter into the extracellular environment of the cell generates a driving force for the influx of Na+ into the cytoplasm [30, 50–52]. This influx of Na+ into the cell by the Na+/H+ transporter is then counterbalanced by the Na+/K+ ATPase pump to maintain the electrochemical gradient. The ratio [K+]i / [Na+]i created by the interplay between Na+, the most abundant inorganic cation and K+, the second most abundant cation in the intracellular fluid attributes to a heavily regulated electrochemical gradient, as they run parallel in concentration [53]. However, K+ ions and TMP play important roles as they are responsible for creating the driving force needed for the release of intracellular Ca2+ [54, 55]. Through the inhibition of membrane bound K+ channels (e.g. Kv), cell cycle progression has been seen to halt during the early and late Gl phase, G1/S transition and G2/M [56, 57]. It has been shown in mouse neuroblastoma cells, Na+/K+ ATPase pumping oscillates during cell cycle progression [58]. Membrane permeabilities to K+ and Na+ are reported to be high in M phase (membrane is in depolarized state), decreases by threefold in G1 phase (membrane is in hyperpolarized state) and rises through the G1/S transition into S phase [58]. As the cell progresses into G2 phase, K+ and Na+ permeabilities decrease and rapidly increase through the G2/M transition phase [58]. Studies in several cancer cell lines provide support for the ability of potassium channels to modulate cellular proliferation [59–62]. For example, the overexpression of K+ channels in Glioma cells maintains a depolarized membrane potential, resulting in high rates of cellular proliferation [63, 64]. These findings highlight the direct relationship between TMP, ionic gradients and cellular proliferation through cell cycle.
3.2.3 Calcium Dynamics
Cell volume oscillations and K+ influxes during the cell cycle regulates cellular proliferation by modulating the release of intracellular Ca2+ ions [65, 66]. The rate of K+ ion permeability through the membrane provides a driving force for Ca2+ influx activating calmodulin. This protein is known to activate crucial proteins such as Rb and cyclin/CDK complexes, necessary for the cell cycle progression. Rb activation is closely regulated by Cyclin D and Cdk4/6 release in early and mid G1 phase [57]. Rb is increasingly phosphorylated through the G1 to S phases, at which point it remains hyperphosphorylated until the completion of M phase [67, 68]. It is known that Ca2+ influx is required for the initiation of S phase and the completion of M phase, possibly through its contribution to a more negative TMP [67–69]. Ca2+/calmodulin mediates the activation of Cdk1 and Cdk2, which are known to be upregulated through the S to M phases [70, 71]. The activated Cdk2 hyperphosphorylates Rb, releasing E2F allowing the cell to progress through the cell cycle. Inhibition of Ca2+ binding protein calmodulin prevents Rb hyperphosphorylation and ultimately leads to cell cycle arrest in G1 phase with subsequent down regulation of Cyclin-D expression and loss of Cdk4/6 and Cdk2 [72]. These results strongly support a direct role of Ca2+ currents and TMPs in the regulation of protein activity throughout the cell cycle.
3.3 Plasma Membrane Dynamics
TMP regulation of lipid-protein interactions in the cellular membrane becomes another point of interest in cellular proliferation. Microviscosity, the physical state describing the degree of membrane fluidity, is a key regulator of membrane protein mobility. It is thought to do so by modulating microtubules, microfilaments, and membrane bound enzymes [58, 73, 74]. TMP has been shown to regulate microviscosity by influencing the conformation of transmembrane ionic channels and activity of enzymes within the phospholipid matrix [23, 24, 75]. Microviscosity of the membrane lipids varies throughout the cell cycle and is highest during mitosis, rapidly decreases through G1 phase, reaching a minimum during S phase and finally increases during G2 phase as the cell enters mitosis (Figure 1B) [23].
Membrane microviscosity and fluidity also regulate cellular proliferation through the modulation of membrane binding phospholipids, ionic headgroups, hydrophobic acyl chains and/or the binding of cholesterol [73, 76, 77]. Expression and accessibility of surface antigens/receptors of a membrane are mediated through fluctuations between membrane microviscosity and membrane fluidity, which are reciprocals of one another [78]. A key relationship between microviscosity and membrane lipids is the ratio of cholesterol to phospholipids that affects internal membrane viscosity, lipid motion and regulate cellular behavior (e.g. cell migration) [24]. As a cell reaches maximum microviscosity, the fluidity of surface membrane lipids are at a minimum while the ratio of cholesterol to phospholipids is at its highest peak [24]. Furthermore, during this microviscosity state, surface antigens and receptors increase in expression, exposure and accessibility, leading to membrane saturation [23]. The reduction of membrane surface area happens concurrently with a decrease in TMP (Figure 1B) [75]. As a consequence of oscillatory microviscosity levels, the cell surface proteins that are indirectly recruited to the membrane play a key role in the regulation of the cell cycle.
4.0 TMP and Cancer
Since TMP is known to control key cellular processes such as proliferation, migration, and growth, its proper maintenance is crucial to body homeostasis [12, 79]. Deregulation of membrane potential can induce drastic changes in cells, and in some cases, cause them to become tumorigenic. In the same virtue, TMP may also be manipulated to prevent tumor progression [5–7, 20, 62].
4.1 Cancer Progression
Numerous studies have shown that deregulation of TMP can lead to tumorigenesis [20, 40, 80–82]. There is a general correlation between the proliferative capacity of a cell and it’s TMP, which cancer cells often use to their advantage [1, 22]. A common trait among tumor cells is that they are more depolarized at any given time, comparable to the TMP excitable cells discussed previously [11, 79]. A panel of breast cancer cells show an increase in depolarization as compared to controls [83]. For example, MCF-7 cells exhibit lower TMP values in both the G1 and S phases as compared to normal breast cells [25]. In addition, a K+ channel, hERG1, normally expressed in differentiated cardiac myocytes is upregulated in various types of cancer cells [62, 65, 84]. Lastly, elevated expression of Kv10.1. and Kv11.1 channels are correlated with an increased probability of relapse and a lower survival rate in human patients [9, 12]. Intracellular Na+ levels are usually elevated in cancerous tissue, supporting the notion that a state of depolarization is critical for cancer transformation [9, 20, 40].
Deregulation of V-ATPase pumps can often lead to excessive cellular proliferation. For example, in many breast cancer cell lines, there is an upregulation in the expression of V-ATPases in the cell membrane whereas overexpression in normal cells confers a neoplastic phenotype [85, 86]. Another voltage-gated proton pump Hv1, critical for proton transfer, is overexpressed in high-grade metastatic human breast cancer cell lines such as MCF-7, but shows minimal expression in low-grade metastatic breast tumors [87]. Overall, these studies suggest that proper ionic flow in cells is critical for the proper cellular maintenance.
4.2 Escaping Cell Death
TMPs not only plays an important role in the proliferation required for tissue homeostasis but also maintains constant cellular turnover. It does so through the activation of pathways that result in cellular degeneration via the inhibition of the cell cycle machinery or through both the intrinsic and extrinsic components of the apoptotic pathway [62]. Cells unresponsive to environmental cues may be forced to enter a stage known as senescence, mediated by TMP [88], which results in permanent cell cycle arrest, through secretion of antigrowth signals that prevent oncogene related growth [89]. This change in the TMP may lead to an upregulation of p16-pRb and p53, the primary mediators of senescence [88].
Proper maintenance of TMP by ITMs is critical for determining cellular fate. For instance, downregulation the Na,K-ATPase has been shown to markedly increase apoptosis in normal and tumor cells [90, 91] K+ channels are critical modulators of cell fate decisions, such as controlling the onset of apoptosis [62, 65, 84]. For example, expression of apoptosis-related KCNA1 channel is significantly reduced in human cancers [92]. Blocking hERG1 channels can stop the flow of K+ into the cell, leading to apoptosis [88]. Similarly, efflux of K+ ions is seen to be a major perquisite behind caspase-3 activated apoptosis in HeLa cells [93]. On the other hand, upregulation of hERG1 results in G0/G1 arrest without undergoing apoptosis, consistent with the state of replicative senescence [20, 94]. These findings suggest that TMP plays an important role in the maintenance of cellular homeostasis and the deregulation can lead to excessive activation of apoptotic pathways leading to massive cell death.
4.3 Cancer Cell Migration
Stages of invasive cancer progression begins with the loss of cell adhesion from the primary tumor site, followed by the invasion of cells into the circulatory system and lastly seeding of distant tissues to form secondary tumors [95]. Although TMP is important in abnormal cellular proliferation, it also plays an indirect role in cell migration by modulating intracellular Ca2+ ion concentrations [9, 40]. For example, overexpression of Kca2.3, key for maintaining a hyperpolarized membrane potential, increases the cell's ability to migrate through the release of intracellular Ca2+ [96]. Deregulation of K+ channel GIRK1 is correlated with higher incidence of lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis in a small sample of patients and is overexpressed in breast tumors [97]. RT-PCR and immunocytochemistry experiments demonstrated that the expression levels of voltage-gated proton pump Hv1 is increased amongst different breast cancer cell lines [87], indicating that proper maintenance of TMP may be necessary for cellular adhesion and function.
4.4 Abrogation of Cancer Growth
Manipulation of ITMs to induce changes in TMP is another potential therapy target to prevent the transformation of normal cells into cancer cells [11]. Membrane hyperpolarization leads to a decrease in proliferation by sustaining high levels of K+ and Ca2+, which can inhibit cell cycle progression (Figure 1B) [95]. Interestingly, tumor-like structures generated in Xenopus embryos were later inhibited by the upregulation of the anion channel CLIC1 in the stroma leading to the hyperpolarizion of the tumor-like cells [5, 6]. Inhibition of certain voltage gated Na+ channels reduces the metastatic ability of prostate cancer cells in a rat model by abrogating their motility [96, 98]. Numerous studies suggest that the pharmacological or genetic inhibition of K+ channels can reduce the proliferation of cancer cells [99–101]. For instance, blocking the Kv10.1 channel causes a cessation of cellular proliferation and migration in several myeloid leukemia cell lines [12].
A negative membrane potential has been associated with ATP induced cell death [102, 103]. The microenvironment of cancer cells tend to be hypoxic, resulting in increased K+ efflux in the extracellular space [102, 103]. The increase in K+ in the microenvironment can inhibit Pannexin-1, leading to apoptosis via caspase-3 activation [104]. This is supported by the observation that normal concentrations of K+ inside a cell inhibits the activation of the apoptosome by preventing the actions of Apaf-2 [105]. TMP across the mitochondria could also decide whether a cell undergoes apoptosis. Loss of normal mitochondrial TMP triggers the release of cytochrome c, into the cytoplasm, signaling the formation of the apoptosome and the death of the cell [84]. These studies suggest that TMP modulation maybe a potential target for directed-apoptosis and proper understanding of TMP and its effect on cell dynamics will be essential for developing novel cancer therapies.
5.0 Schmidtea mediterranea and TMP
Ion transporters and channels serve as excellent targets for cancer therapy because they are present on the surface of cell membranes and many molecular tools are readily available for manipulating them [61, 94, 95]. Most drugs used to block or enhance ion transporter’s activity have been characterized extensively and a large number have FDA approval [79], which offers the possibility of quick translation into therapies. Pharmacological deregulation of ion channels is an effective method for disrupting TMP. It allows for precise control and timed inhibition while delivering a more informative result than a gene knockout method where there could be many complications due to functional compensations [10, 14, 15]. Dissecting the molecular mechanisms by which biophysical properties regulate tumorigenesis and metastatic processes requires a model system that is tractable to both biophysical/physiological techniques and state-of-the-art molecular genetics [11].
The planarian model organism Schmidtea mediterranea provides an excellent base of study for understanding bioelectric regulation of tissue regeneration as they possess a simple anatomy along with a remarkable ability to rapidly regenerate [19, 106–112]. This regenerative ability extends to healing any part of its body after receiving an injury, including the neural tissue, digestive system, brain, photoreceptors and connective tissue (Figure 2A) [19, 107, 109, 110]. Its robust regeneration is fueled by an abundant population of adult pluripotent stem cells known as neoblasts that is responsible for cellular turnover as well as tissue regeneration [19, 107–110, 113]. The genome of S. mediterranea has been sequenced and many of molecular tools have been developed to study genetics, physiology, and biochemistry in this model organism [19, 107–110, 113].
Figure 2. a. Planarian tissue regeneration and maintenance.
(A) Images of a live worm (left) amputated pre-pharyngeal; images on the right show the regeneration of the anterior portion including the head. Time-lapse images depict proper wound healing response and blastema formation in a regenerating planarian. By Day 7, the fragment has regenerated into a completely functional animal. (B) Image depicts cell division (yellow dots, H3P immunostaining) after RNAi of TOR and PTEN genes in comparison to control (mock-RNAi). TOR(RNAi) reduces mitotic activity while PTEN(RNAi) induce the opposite effect.
Immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization are often used to visualize cell migration and differentiation patterns in planarians [114]. These techniques can determine anatomical structural differences, neoblast state and abnormalities in tissue patterning (Figure 3A). Neoblasts in different phases of the cell cycle can be visualized through the use of anti-phospho histone H3 antibody (H3P) and bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) [115]. Fluorescent activated cell sorting (FACS) is a unique method of isolating planarian neoblast populations. Dyes such as Hoechst 33342 and calcein AM are used to stain live cell DNA content and cytoplasmic activity [116]. FACS allows for the isolation of cell populations enriched in radiation-insensitive differentiated cells (Xins) or radiation-sensitive adult stem cells fractions (X1 and X2) (Figure 3B) [106, 116–119]. Cell cycle analysis is also possible through flow cytometry [120, 121].
Figure 3. a. Planarians allow for analysis of stem cell proliferation, differentiation and cell death in the whole organism.
(A) Left to right. Live worm, whole-mount immunohistochemistry (WIHC) to stain cells in different parts of the cell cycle, including mitotic cells alone (H3P), cells entering S phase of the cell cycle (BrdU positive cells, green dots indicate proliferative cells), cell death showing Caspase-3 and TUNEL (fragmented DNA of apoptotic cells) (B) FACS plot shows gates used to isolate irradiation sensitive (X1 and X2)and insensitive (Xins) populations based on DNA content and viability.
The adult body of S. mediterranea provides unique opportunities to analyze regulation of cell proliferation by TMP [1, 13, 19, 122]. Localized or systemic neoblast proliferation could be altered by metabolic changes (feeding or starvation) and tissue injury [17, 108, 121]. Furthermore, neoblast overproliferation and tumor formation can be induced by manipulation of well-characterized tumor suppressor genes (e.g. p53, PTEN) (Figure 2B) [123, 124]. The pattern of regeneration of entire body parts is susceptible to molecular manipulation of ion flows, gap junctional communications, and conserved signaling pathways such as Wnt and B-catenin [17, 18, 107, 125, 126]. Regeneration in planarians proceeds through activation of cell proliferation and application of bioelectric fields are known to modulate repair and tissue polarity in flatworms [127, 128]. Membrane potential across the whole planarian body could be monitored using DiBAC (4) (3) staining, and the newly developed approach termed Planarian Immobilization Chips (PICs) to visualize bioelectrical changes in real time while minimizing tissue damage [13, 122, 129, 130].
The H,K-ATPase is a major player in the regulation of tissue maintenance and regeneration in the planarian model. This ion transporter is essential for both the proper development of organ size during planarian regeneration and the anterior polarity in regenerating worms [13, 122]. Functional disruption of H, K-ATPase by RNA interference (RNAi) leads to failure in tissue remodeling and proportion adjustment of regenerated structures [13]. These results in planarians are consistent with zebrafish studies that found bioelectric signaling regulates fin allometric scaling and coordination of growth [131]. Similarly, ion transporters are required for proper regeneration of lost tissue as well stem cell maintenance in Xenopus and mice [132, 133]. Together, findings in both vertebrate and invertebrate models demonstrate that TMP and ITMs modulate central issues of regeneration and development, such as cell fate decisions, the establishment and maintenance of tissue proportion, and the growth of complex structures, through well conserved mechanisms.
Furthermore, planarians are also amenable to chemical treatments aimed at targeting ion transporters and recordings of TMP in real time [18, 122, 125, 129]. Drug-induced changes in TMP could be used as a venue to perform gain of function studies in planaria, as there are currently no other means for doing such research in this system. Increased knowledge of bioelectricity in living systems will contribute to our understanding of how ion flows can be used in clinical settings to influence cellular proliferation, migration and differentiation to control tissue function. For instance, modulation of ion transport with chemicals could be a powerful tool to halt cell cycle progression in abnormally proliferating cells [134] or an instrument to prompt cellular division to re-establish form and function to lost or damaged tissues [133]. The molecular basis of these processes could be readily investigated in the planarian model and later validated in more complex systems.
6.0 CONCLUDING REMARKS
TMP and the many proteins that are involved in its maintenance, are of great importance to the normal cellular function and to a greater extent, the organism. The complex interplay between K+, Na+, Cl− and Ca2+ ions in and out of the cell determines the polarization of TMP at any given moment. Ionic oscillations during the cell cycle are able to control passage of cells through critical checkpoints by regulating key proteins such as Cyclin/CDKs and Rb. The deregulation of a small subset of proteins in this intricate system can lead to abnormal cell behavior, ultimately leading to the onset of tumorigenesis. Most studies that have been performed to explore this phenomena have been through in vitro methods, however, this only provides a partial view of the bioelectrical phenomena. In order to gain a comprehensive understanding of TMP's role in cellular processes, it is critical to perform in vivo analyses of cell cycle progression and cancer transformation in the adult body and the planarian S. mediterranea is a well-suited model organism for this task.
Planarians provide an excellent model for studying mechanisms of bioelectric regulation of cell cycle as they are host to a population of mitotically active, pluripotent stem cells that maintain their high rate of cellular turnover and impressive regenerative capability. They are amenable to analysis of cellular transformation by chemical treatment or genetic manipulation of tumor suppressor genes. The many tools that have been developed to study these animals will prove useful for manipulating various facets of their internal characteristics and eventually enable us to address how endogenous electric fields contribute to tissue homeostasis and regeneration of the whole organism. Increased efforts in this area will propel the field into creating applications, which can eventually lead to a better understanding of human tissue homeostasis and regeneration.
BBA Review Highlights.
Transmembrane potential regulates key cellular processes.
Cell cycle machinery is modulated by controlled changes in ionic flow.
Deregulation of membrane polarity may lead to onset of tumorigenesis.
The planarian model provides unique opportunities for understanding bioelectric regulation of cellular behavior.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Natasha M. Flores, Devon C. Davidian and T. Harshani Peiris for comments on the manuscript. Research in the Oviedo Lab is supported by grants from the NIH-National Cancer Institute and National Institute of General Medical Sciences, CA176114 and GM109372.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Conflict of interest
The authors of Barghouth et. al. declare no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Levin M. Large-scale biophysics: ion flows and regeneration. Trends in cell biology. 2007;17:261–270. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2007.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Levin M. Bioelectric mechanisms in regeneration: Unique aspects and future perspectives. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2009;20:543–556. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.04.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.McCaig CD, Rajnicek AM, Song B, Zhao M. Controlling cell behavior electrically: current views and future potential. Physiol Rev. 2005;85:943–978. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00020.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sundelacruz S, Levin M, Kaplan DL. Role of membrane potential in the regulation of cell proliferation and differentiation. Stem Cell Rev. 2009;5:231–246. doi: 10.1007/s12015-009-9080-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chernet BT, Levin M. Transmembrane voltage potential is an essential cellular parameter for the detection and control of tumor development in a Xenopus model. Dis Model Mech. 2013;6:595–607. doi: 10.1242/dmm.010835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chernet BT, Levin M. Transmembrane voltage potential of somatic cells controls oncogene-mediated tumorigenesis at long-range. Oncotarget. 2014;5:3287–3306. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.1935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lobikin M, Chernet B, Lobo D, Levin M. Resting potential, oncogene-induced tumorigenesis, and metastasis: the bioelectric basis of cancer in vivo. Phys Biol. 2012;9:065002. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/9/6/065002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tseng A, Levin M. Cracking the bioelectric code: Probing endogenous ionic controls of pattern formation. Commun Integr Biol. 2013;6:e22595. doi: 10.4161/cib.22595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yang M, Brackenbury WJ. Membrane potential and cancer progression. Frontiers in physiology. 2013;4:185. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2013.00185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Levin M. Reprogramming cells and tissue patterning via bioelectrical pathways: molecular mechanisms and biomedical opportunities. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine. 2013;5:657–676. doi: 10.1002/wsbm.1236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Blackiston DJ, McLaughlin KA, Levin M. Bioelectric controls of cell proliferation: ion channels, membrane voltage and the cell cycle. Cell Cycle. 2009;8:3527–3536. doi: 10.4161/cc.8.21.9888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lang F, Stournaras C. Ion channels in cancer: future perspectives and clinical potential, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences. 2014;369:20130108. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Beane WS, Morokuma J, Lemire JM, Levin M. Bioelectric signaling regulates head and organ size during planarian regeneration. Development. 2013;140:313–322. doi: 10.1242/dev.086900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Levin M. Gap junctional communication in morphogenesis. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2007;94:186–206. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2007.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Levin M. Molecular bioelectricity in developmental biology: new tools and recent discoveries: control of cell behavior and pattern formation by transmembrane potential gradients. Bioessays. 2012;34:205–217. doi: 10.1002/bies.201100136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Robinson KR. The responses of cells to electrical fields: a review. The Journal of cell biology. 1985;101:2023–2027. doi: 10.1083/jcb.101.6.2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Oviedo NJ, Levin M. smedinx-11 is a planarian stem cell gap junction gene required for regeneration and homeostasis. Development. 2007;134:3121–3131. doi: 10.1242/dev.006635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Oviedo NJ, Morokuma J, Walentek P, Kema IP, Gu MB, Ahn JM, Hwang JS, Gojobori T, Levin M. Long-range neural and gap junction protein-mediated cues control polarity during planarian regeneration. Dev Biol. 2010;339:188–199. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.12.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Peiris TH, Oviedo NJ. Gap junction proteins: master regulators of the planarian stem cell response to tissue maintenance and injury. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2013;1828:109–117. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2012.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Djamgoz MB, Coombes RC, Schwab A. Ion transport and cancer: from initiation to metastasis, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences. 2014;369:20130092. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Boonstra J, Mummery CL, Tertoolen LG, Van Der Saag PT, De Laat SW. Cation transport and growth regulation in neuroblastoma cells. Modulations of K+ transport and electrical membrane properties during the cell cycle. Journal of cellular physiology. 1981;107:75–83. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041070110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cone CD., Jr. Unified theory on the basic mechanism of normal mitotic control and oncogenesis. J Theor Biol. 1971;30:151–181. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(71)90042-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.de Laat SW, van der Saag PT, Shinitzky M. Microviscosity modulation during the cell cycle of neuroblastoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977;74:4458–4461. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.10.4458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Petitou M, Tuy F, Rosenfeld C, Mishal Z, Paintrand M, Jasnin C, Mathe G, Inbar M. Decreased microviscosity of membrane lipids in leukemic cells: two possible mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978;75:2306–2310. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.5.2306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wonderlin WF, Woodfork KA, Strobl JS. Changes in membrane potential during the progression of MCF-7 human mammary tumor cells through the cell cycle. Journal of cellular physiology. 1995;165:177–185. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041650121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Baars TL, Petri S, Peters C, Mayer A. Role of the V-ATPase in regulation of the vacuolar fission-fusion equilibrium. Mol Biol Cell. 2007;18:3873–3882. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E07-03-0205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gottlieb E, Armour SM, Harris MH, Thompson CB. Mitochondrial membrane potential regulates matrix configuration and cytochrome c release during apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2003;10:709–717. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Heming TA, Bidani A. Effects of plasmalemmal V-ATPase activity on plasma membrane potential of resident alveolar macrophages. Lung. 2003;181:121–135. doi: 10.1007/s00408-003-1013-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sachs HG, Stambrook PJ, Ebert JD. Changes in membrane potential during the cell cycle. Exp Cell Res. 1974;83:362–366. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(74)90350-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Harvey WR, Wieczorek H. Animal plasma membrane energization by chemiosmotic H+ V-ATPases. J Exp Biol. 1997;200:203–216. doi: 10.1242/jeb.200.2.203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Manabe T, Yoshimori T, Henomatsu N, Tashiro Y. Inhibitors of vacuolar-type H(+)-ATPase suppresses proliferation of cultured cells. Journal of cellular physiology. 1993;157:445–452. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041570303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ichikawa J, Inoue R. TRPC6 regulates cell cycle progression by modulating membrane potential in bone marrow stromal cells. British journal of pharmacology. 2014 doi: 10.1111/bph.12840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Forgac M. Structure and properties of the vacuolar (H+)-ATPases. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1999;274:12951–12954. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.19.12951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Jentsch TJ, Stein V, Weinreich F, Zdebik AA. Molecular structure and physiological function of chloride channels. Physiol Rev. 2002;82:503–568. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00029.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Jennings ML, Cui J. Chloride homeostasis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: high affinity influx, V-ATPase-dependent sequestration, and identification of a candidate Cl-sensor. J Gen Physiol. 2008;131:379–391. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200709905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Klausen TK, Bergdahl A, Hougaard C, Christophersen P, Pedersen SF, Hoffmann EK. Cell cycle-dependent activity of the volume- and Ca2+-activated anion currents in Ehrlich lettre ascites cells. Journal of cellular physiology. 2007;210:831–842. doi: 10.1002/jcp.20918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Shen MR, Droogmans G, Eggermont J, Voets T, Ellory JC, Nilius B. Differential expression of volume-regulated anion channels during cell cycle progression of human cervical cancer cells. J Physiol. 2000;529(Pt 2):385–394. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.00385.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Munaron L, Antoniotti S, Lovisolo D. Intracellular calcium signals and control of cell proliferation: how many mechanisms? J Cell Mol Med. 2004;8:161–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2004.tb00271.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Schreiber R. Ca2+ signaling, intracellular pH and cell volume in cell proliferation. J Membr Biol. 2005;205:129–137. doi: 10.1007/s00232-005-0778-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yang B, Cao L, Liu B, McCaig CD, Pu J. The transition from proliferation to differentiation in colorectal cancer is regulated by the calcium activated chloride channel A1. PloS one. 2013;8:e60861. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mao J, Chen L, Xu B, Wang L, Wang W, Li M, Zheng M, Li H, Guo J, Li W, Jacob TJ, Wang L. Volume-activated chloride channels contribute to cell-cycle-dependent regulation of HeLa cell migration. Biochem Pharmacol. 2009;77:159–168. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2008.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mao J, Li X, Chen W, Xu B, Zhang H, Li H, Wang L, Jin X, Zhu J, Lin G, Wang W, Chen L. Cell cycle-dependent subcellular distribution of ClC-3 in HeLa cells. Histochem Cell Biol. 2012;137:763–776. doi: 10.1007/s00418-012-0937-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Shiozaki A, Otsuji E, Marunaka Y. Intracellular chloride regulates the G(1)/S cell cycle progression in gastric cancer cells. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2011;3:119–122. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v3.i8.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Nilius B. Chloride channels go cell cycling. J Physiol. 2001;532:581. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0581e.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Qu Z, Yao W, Yao R, Liu X, Yu K, Hartzell C. The Ca(2+) -activated Cl(−) channel, ANO1 (TMEM16A), is a double-edged sword in cell proliferation and tumorigenesis. Cancer Med. 2014;3:453–461. doi: 10.1002/cam4.232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Voets T, Szucs G, Droogmans G, Nilius B. Blockers of volume-activated Cl-currents inhibit endothelial cell proliferation. Pflugers Arch. 1995;431:132–134. doi: 10.1007/BF00374387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wondergem R, Gong W, Monen SH, Dooley SN, Gonce JL, Conner TD, Houser M, Ecay TW, Ferslew KE. Blocking swelling-activated chloride current inhibits mouse liver cell proliferation. J Physiol. 2001;532:661–672. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0661e.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Rouzaire-Dubois B, Malo M, Milandri JB, Dubois JM. Cell size-proliferation relationship in rat glioma cells. Glia. 2004;45:249–257. doi: 10.1002/glia.10320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Chen L, Wang L, Zhu L, Nie S, Zhang J, Zhong P, Cai B, Luo H, Jacob TJ. Cell cycle-dependent expression of volume-activated chloride currents in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2002;283:C1313–C1323. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00182.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Aw S, Adams DS, Qiu D, Levin M. H,K-ATPase protein localization and Kir4.1 function reveal concordance of three axes during early determination of left-right asymmetry. Mech Dev. 2008;125:353–372. doi: 10.1016/j.mod.2007.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Horng JL, Lin LY, Huang CJ, Katoh F, Kaneko T, Hwang PP. Knockdown of V-ATPase subunit A (atp6v1a) impairs acid secretion and ion balance in zebrafish (Danio rerio) Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2007;292:R2068–R2076. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00578.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.LaPointe MS, Batlle DC. Na+/H+ exchange and vascular smooth muscle proliferation. Am J Med Sci. 1994;307(Suppl 1):S9–S16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Morrill GA, Robbins E. Changes in intracellular cations during the cell cycle in HeLa cells. Physiol Chem Phys Med NMR. 1984;16:209–219. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Galva C, Artigas P, Gatto C. Nuclear Na+/K+-ATPase plays an active role in nucleoplasmic Ca2+ homeostasis. J Cell Sci. 2012;125:6137–6147. doi: 10.1242/jcs.114959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Scamps F, Valentin S, Dayanithi G, Valmier J. Calcium channel subtypes responsible for voltage-gated intracellular calcium elevations in embryonic rat motoneurons. Neuroscience. 1998;87:719–730. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(98)00165-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Huang X, Dubuc AM, Hashizume R, Berg J, He Y, Wang J, Chiang C, Cooper MK, Northcott PA, Taylor MD, Barnes MJ, Tihan T, Chen J, Hackett CS, Weiss WA, James CD, Rowitch DH, Shuman MA, Jan YN, Jan LY. Voltage-gated potassium channel EAG2 controls mitotic entry and tumor growth in medulloblastoma via regulating cell volume dynamics. Genes & development. 2012;26:1780–1796. doi: 10.1101/gad.193789.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Ouadid-Ahidouch H, Ahidouch A. K(+) channels and cell cycle progression in tumor cells. Frontiers in physiology. 2013;4:220. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2013.00220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Mummery CL, Boonstra J, van der Saag PT, de Laat SW. Modulations of Na+ transport during the cell cycle of neuroblastoma cells. Journal of cellular physiology. 1982;112:27–34. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041120106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Park KS, Han MH, Jang HK, Kim KA, Cha EJ, Kim WJ, Choi YH, Kim Y. The TREK2 Channel Is Involved in the Proliferation of 253J Cell, a Human Bladder Carcinoma Cell. Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 2013;17:511–516. doi: 10.4196/kjpp.2013.17.6.511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wu J, Zhong D, Wu X, Sha M, Kang L, Ding Z. Voltage-gated potassium channel Kv1.3 is highly expressed in human osteosarcoma and promotes osteosarcoma growth. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14:19245–19256. doi: 10.3390/ijms140919245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Arcangeli A. Expression and role of hERG channels in cancer cells. Novartis Found Symp. 2005;266:225–232. discussion 232–224. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Bortner CD, Cidlowski JA. Ion channels and apoptosis in cancer, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences. 2014;369:20130104. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Bordey A, Lyons SA, Hablitz JJ, Sontheimer H. Electrophysiological characteristics of reactive astrocytes in experimental cortical dysplasia. J Neurophysiol. 2001;85:1719–1731. doi: 10.1152/jn.2001.85.4.1719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Higashimori H, Sontheimer H. Role of Kir4.1 channels in growth control of glia. Glia. 2007;55:1668–1679. doi: 10.1002/glia.20574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Lang F, Foller M, Lang KS, Lang PA, Ritter M, Gulbins E, Vereninov A, Huber SM. Ion channels in cell proliferation and apoptotic cell death. J Membr Biol. 2005;205:147–157. doi: 10.1007/s00232-005-0780-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Ritter M, Woll E, Waldegger S, Haussinger D, Lang HJ, Scholz W, Scholkens B, Lang F. Cell shrinkage stimulates bradykinin-induced cell membrane potential oscillations in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts expressing the ras-oncogene. Pflugers Arch. 1993;423:221–224. doi: 10.1007/BF00374398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Dora EG, Rudin N, Martell JR, Esposito MS, Ramirez RM. RPD3 (REC3) mutations affect mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Current genetics. 1999;35:68–76. doi: 10.1007/s002940050434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Classon M, Harlow E. The retinoblastoma tumour suppressor in development and cancer. Nature reviews. Cancer. 2002;2:910–917. doi: 10.1038/nrc950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Takuwa N, Zhou W, Takuwa Y. Calcium, calmodulin and cell cycle progression. Cell Signal. 1995;7:93–104. doi: 10.1016/0898-6568(94)00074-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Attwooll C, Lazzerini Denchi E, Helin K. The E2F family: specific functions and overlapping interests. The EMBO journal. 2004;23:4709–4716. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Burkhart DL, Sage J. Cellular mechanisms of tumour suppression by the retinoblastoma gene. Nature reviews. Cancer. 2008;8:671–682. doi: 10.1038/nrc2399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Kahl CR, Means AR. Regulation of cyclin D1/Cdk4 complexes by calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase I. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2004;279:15411–15419. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M312543200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Swann AC. Free fatty acids and (Na+,K+)-ATPase: effects on cation regulation, enzyme conformation, and interactions with ethanol. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1984;233:354–361. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(84)90456-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.van Zoelen EJ, Mummery CL, Boonstra J, van der Saag PT, de Laat SW. Membrane regulation of the Na+,K+-ATPase during the neuroblastoma cell cycle: correlation with protein lateral mobility. J Cell Biochem. 1983;21:77–91. doi: 10.1002/jcb.240210109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Corda D, Pasternak C, Shinitzky M. Increase in lipid microviscosity of unilamellar vesicles upon the creation of transmembrane potential. J Membr Biol. 1982;65:235–242. doi: 10.1007/BF01869967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Berstein G, Haga T, Ichiyama A. Effect of the lipid environment on the differential affinity of purified cerebral and atrial muscarinic acetylcholine receptors for pirenzepine. Mol Pharmacol. 1989;36:601–607. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Emmerson PJ, Clark MJ, Medzihradsky F, Remmers AE. Membrane microviscosity modulates mu-opioid receptor conformational transitions and agonist efficacy. J Neurochem. 1999;73:289–300. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1999.0730289.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Tsuda K, Nishio I. Role of estrogens in the regulation of membrane microviscosity. Circ Res. 2004;94:e17. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000115311.56442.A6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Turner KL, Sontheimer H. Cl- and K+ channels and their role in primary brain tumour biology, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences. 2014;369:20130095. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Fiorio Pla A, Munaron L. Functional properties of ion channels and transporters in tumour vascularization, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences. 2014;369:20130103. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Andersen AP, Moreira JM, Pedersen SF. Interactions of ion transporters and channels with cancer cell metabolism and the tumour microenvironment, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences. 2014;369:20130098. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Reshkin SJ, Greco MR, Cardone RA. Role of pHi, and proton transporters in oncogene-driven neoplastic transformation, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences. 2014;369:20130100. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Marino AA, Iliev IG, Schwalke MA, Gonzalez E, Marler KC, Flanagan CA. Association between cell membrane potential and breast cancer. Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine. 1994;15:82–89. doi: 10.1159/000217878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Thompson GJ, Langlais C, Cain K, Conley EC, Cohen GM. Elevated extracellular [K+] inhibits death-receptor- and chemical-mediated apoptosis prior to caspase activation and cytochrome c release. Biochem J. 2001;357:137–145. doi: 10.1042/0264-6021:3570137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Perona R, Serrano R. Increased pH and tumorigenicity of fibroblasts expressing a yeast proton pump. Nature. 1988;334:438–440. doi: 10.1038/334438a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Salyer SA, Olberding JR, Distler AA, Lederer ED, Clark BJ, Delamere NA, Khundmiri SJ. Vacuolar ATPase driven potassium transport in highly metastatic breast cancer cells. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2013;1832:1734–1743. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2013.04.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Wang Y, Li SJ, Pan J, Che Y, Yin J, Zhao Q. Specific expression of the human voltage-gated proton channel Hv1 in highly metastatic breast cancer cells, promotes tumor progression and metastasis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011;412:353–359. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.07.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Lansu K, Gentile S. Potassium channel activation inhibits proliferation of breast cancer cells by activating a senescence program. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4:e652. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2013.174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Adams PD. Healing and hurting: molecular mechanisms, functions, and pathologies of cellular senescence. Molecular cell. 2009;36:2–14. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Alkahtani SH. The steroidal Na+/K+ ATPase inhibitor 3-[(R)-3-pyrrolidinyl]oxime derivative (3-R-POD) induces potent pro-apoptotic responses in colonic tumor cells. Anticancer research. 2014;34:2967–2971. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Liu C, Bai Y, Chen Y, Wang Y, Sottejeau Y, Liu L, Li X, Lingrel JB, Malhotra D, Cooper CJ, Shapiro JI, Xie ZJ, Tian J. Reduction of Na/K-ATPase potentiates marinobufagenin-induced cardiac dysfunction and myocyte apoptosis. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2012;287:16390–16398. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.304451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Lallet-Daher H, Wiel C, Gitenay D, Navaratnam N, Augert A, Le Calve B, Verbeke S, Carling D, Aubert S, Vindrieux D, Bernard D. Potassium channel KCNA1 modulates oncogene-induced senescence and transformation. Cancer Res. 2013;73:5253–5265. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-3690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Dezaki K, Maeno E, Sato K, Akita T, Okada Y. Early-phase occurrence of K+ and Cl- efflux in addition to Ca 2+ mobilization is a prerequisite to apoptosis in HeLa cells. Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death. 2012;17:821–831. doi: 10.1007/s10495-012-0716-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Pardo LA, Stuhmer W. The roles of K(+) channels in cancer. Nature reviews. Cancer. 2014;14:39–48. doi: 10.1038/nrc3635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Prevarskaya N, Skryma R, Shuba Y. Ion channels and the hallmarks of cancer. Trends Mol Med. 2010;16:107–121. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2010.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Chimote AA, Hajdu P, Kucher V, Boiko N, Kuras Z, Szilagyi O, Yun YH, Conforti L. Selective inhibition of KCa3.1 channels mediates adenosine regulation of the motility of human T cells. J Immunol. 2013;191:6273–6280. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1300702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Kammerer S, Sokoloski A, Hackl H, Jahn S, Asslaber M, Symmans F, Peintinger F, Regitnig P, Scheibmayer W, Bauernhofer T. Overexpression Of G Protein-Activated Inward Rectifier Potassium Channel 1 (GIRK1) Is Associated With Lymph Node Metastasis And Poor Prognosis In Breast Cancer. Annals of Oncology. 2014;25:8–16. [Google Scholar]
- 98.Yildirim S, Altun S, Gumushan H, Patel A, Djamgoz MB. Voltage-gated sodium channel activity promotes prostate cancer metastasis in vivo. Cancer Lett. 2012;323:58–61. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2012.03.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Chang KW, Yuan TC, Fang KP, Yang FS, Liu CJ, Chang CS, Lin SC. The increase of voltage-gated potassium channel Kv3.4 mRNA expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology. 2003;32:606–611. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0714.2003.00197.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Fraser SP, Grimes JA, Djamgoz MB. Effects of voltage-gated ion channel modulators on rat prostatic cancer cell proliferation: comparison of strongly and weakly metastatic cell lines. The Prostate. 2000;44:61–76. doi: 10.1002/1097-0045(20000615)44:1<61::aid-pros9>3.0.co;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Menendez ST, Rodrigo JP, Alvarez-Teijeiro S, Villaronga MA, Allonca E, Vallina A, Astudillo A, Barros F, Suarez C, Garcia-Pedrero JM. Role of HERG1 potassium channel in both malignant transformation and disease progression in head and neck carcinomas, Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology. Inc. 2012;25:1069–1078. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2012.63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Di Virgilio F, Pizzo P, Zanovello P, Bronte V, Collavo D. Extracellular ATP as a possible mediator of cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Immunology today. 1990;11:274–277. doi: 10.1016/0167-5699(90)90111-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Zheng LM, Zychlinsky A, Liu CC, Ojcius DM, Young JD. Extracellular ATP as a trigger for apoptosis or programmed cell death. The Journal of cell biology. 1991;112:279–288. doi: 10.1083/jcb.112.2.279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Jackson DG, Wang J, Keane RW, Scemes E, Dahl G. ATP and potassium ions: a deadly combination for astrocytes. Scientific reports. 2014;4:4576. doi: 10.1038/srep04576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Cain K, Langlais C, Sun XM, Brown DG, Cohen GM. Physiological concentrations of K+ inhibit cytochrome c-dependent formation of the apoptosome. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2001;276:41985–41990. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M107419200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Reddien PW. Specialized progenitors and regeneration. Development. 2013;140:951–957. doi: 10.1242/dev.080499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Aboobaker AA. Planarian stem cells: a simple paradigm for regeneration. Trends in cell biology. 2011;21:304–311. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2011.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Wenemoser D, Reddien PW. Planarian regeneration involves distinct stem cell responses to wounds and tissue absence. Dev Biol. 2010;344:979–991. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.06.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Reddien PW, Sanchez Alvarado A. Fundamentals of planarian regeneration. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2004;20:725–757. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.20.010403.095114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Rink JC. Stem cell systems and regeneration in planaria. Dev Genes Evol. 2013;223:67–84. doi: 10.1007/s00427-012-0426-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Newmark PA, Sanchez Alvarado A. Not your father's planarian: a classic model enters the era of functional genomics. Nat Rev Genet. 2002;3:210–219. doi: 10.1038/nrg759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Salo E, Abril JF, Adell T, Cebria F, Eckelt K, Fernandez-Taboada E, Handberg-Thorsager M, Iglesias M, Molina MD, Rodriguez-Esteban G. Planarian regeneration: achievements and future directions after 20 years of research. Int J Dev Biol. 2009;53:1317–1327. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.072414es. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Pellettieri J, Sanchez Alvarado A. Cell turnover and adult tissue homeostasis: from humans to planarians. Annu Rev Genet. 2007;41:83–105. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.41.110306.130244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Pearson BJ, Eisenhoffer GT, Gurley KA, Rink JC, Miller DE, Sanchez Alvarado A. Formaldehyde-based whole-mount in situ hybridization method for planarians. Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists. 2009;238:443–450. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.21849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Newmark PA, Sanchez Alvarado A. Bromodeoxyuridine specifically labels the regenerative stem cells of planarians. Dev Biol. 2000;220:142–153. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2000.9645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Hayashi T, Asami M, Higuchi S, Shibata N, Agata K. Isolation of planarian X-ray-sensitive stem cells by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Dev Growth Differ. 2006;48:371–380. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-169X.2006.00876.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Hayashi T, Agata K. A unique FACS method to isolate stem cells in planarian. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;879:29–37. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-815-3_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Moritz S, Stockle F, Ortmeier C, Schmitz H, Rodriguez-Esteban G, Key G, Gentile L. Heterogeneity of planarian stem cells in the S/G2/M phase. Int J Dev Biol. 2012;56:117–125. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.113440sm. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Romero BT, Evans DJ, Aboobaker AA. FACS analysis of the planarian stem cell compartment as a tool to understand regenerative mechanisms. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;916:167–179. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-980-8_13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Kang H, Sanchez Alvarado A. Flow cytometry methods for the study of cell-cycle parameters of planarian stem cells. Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists. 2009;238:1111–1117. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.21928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Peiris TH, Weckerle F, Ozamoto E, Ramirez D, Davidian D, Garcia-Ojeda ME, Oviedo NJ. TOR signaling regulates planarian stem cells and controls localized and organismal growth. J Cell Sci. 2012;125:1657–1665. doi: 10.1242/jcs.104711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Beane WS, Morokuma J, Adams DS, Levin M. A chemical genetics approach reveals H,K-ATPase-mediated membrane voltage is required for planarian head regeneration. Chem Biol. 2011;18:77–89. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2010.11.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Oviedo NJ, Pearson BJ, Levin M, Sánchez Alvarado A. Planarian PTEN homologs regulate stem cells and regeneration through TOR signaling. Dis Model Mech. 2008;1:131–143. doi: 10.1242/dmm.000117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Pearson BJ, Sanchez Alvarado A. Regeneration, stem cells, and the evolution of tumor suppression. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2008;73:565–572. doi: 10.1101/sqb.2008.73.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Nogi T, Levin M. Characterization of innexin gene expression and functional roles of gap-junctional communication in planarian regeneration. Dev Biol. 2005;287:314–335. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Reddien PW. Constitutive gene expression and the specification of tissue identity in adult planarian biology. Trends in genetics : TIG. 2011;27:277–285. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2011.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Rose SM. The correlation between bioelectrical and morphogenetic polarity during regeneration in Tubularia. Dev Biol. 1972;28:274–279. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(72)90143-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Marsh G, Beams HW. Electrical control of morphogenesis in regenerating Dugesia tigrina. I. Relation of axial polarity to field strength. Journal of cellular physiology. 1952;39:191–213. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1030390203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Oviedo NJ, Nicolas CL, Adams DS, Levin M. Live Imaging of Planarian Membrane Potential Using DiBAC4(3) CSH protocols. 2008;2008 doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot5055. pdb prot5055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Dexter JP, Tamme MB, Lind CH, Collins EM. On-chip immobilization of planarians for in vivo imaging. Scientific reports. 2014;4:6388. doi: 10.1038/srep06388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Perathoner S, Daane JM, Henrion U, Seebohm G, Higdon CW, Johnson SL, Nusslein-Volhard C, Harris MP. Bioelectric signaling regulates size in zebrafish fins. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004080. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Lange C, Prenninger S, Knuckles P, Taylor V, Levin M, Calegari F. The H(+) vacuolar ATPase maintains neural stem cells in the developing mouse cortex. Stem cells and development. 2011;20:843–850. doi: 10.1089/scd.2010.0484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Adams DS, Masi A, Levin M. H+ pump-dependent changes in membrane voltage are an early mechanism necessary and sufficient to induce Xenopus tail regeneration. Development. 2007;134:1323–1335. doi: 10.1242/dev.02812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Villalonga N, Ferreres JC, Argiles JM, Condom E, Felipe A. Potassium channels are a new target field in anticancer drug design. Recent patents on anti-cancer drug discovery. 2007;2:212–223. doi: 10.2174/157489207782497181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]