Skip to main content
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine logoLink to International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
. 2015 Jul 15;8(7):11301–11306.

Decreased mean platelet volume is associated with the developing stage of fetoplacental unit in spontaneous abortion

Mustafa Kaplanoglu 1, Tuncay Yuce 2, Mehmet Bulbul 1
PMCID: PMC4565322  PMID: 26379939

Abstract

Aim: The aim was to evaluate the place of mean platelet volume (MPV) in predicting spontaneous miscarriage and to identify any differences in its values following miscarriage after biochemical and clinical pregnancy. Material and method: We retrospectively evaluated the data of 305 spontaneous miscarriages and 168 control subjects. The miscarriage subjects were evaluated in two groups: miscarriage after biochemical pregnancy (n=79) (BA group) and miscarriage after clinical pregnancy (n=226) (CA group). Demographic and laboratory data of all subjects were statistically compared. Results: No statistically significant difference was found between the miscarriage and control subjects in terms of demographic data and Hb, Htc, WBC, and Plt values. The mean platelet volume (MPV) value in the miscarriage group (8.99±1.47 fl) was statistically significantly lower than in the control group (9.66±1.64 fl) (P<0.001). A statistically significant difference was present between the BA, CA and control group, with the lowest MPV value in the BA group (8.64±1.34 fl, 9.11±1.49 fl, and 9.66±1.64 fl, respectively) (P<0.001). Discussion: MPV was significantly lower in patients with miscarriage than the control group, and this was correlated with the gestational stage when the miscarriage occurred.

Keywords: Mean platelet volume, biochemical abortion, clinic abortion, prediction

Introduction

Spontaneous miscarriage is identified as the loss of pregnancy before the 20th gestational week and is the most common pregnancy complication [1,2]. The risk decreases the gestational week increases. A miscarriage occurs in 40% of pregnancies before they are defined clinically and 8-22% afterwards [3,4]. Miscarriage can occur after biochemical pregnancy (BA) or after clinical pregnancy (CA) on laboratory and ultrasonographic evaluation. Many factors are associated with this pregnancy complication, including endocrinology imbalance, immune dysfunction, genetic disorders, advanced maternal age, gravity, body mass index (BMI) >25 or <18, genital infection, environmental toxins, anatomic uterine defects, and chromosomal abnormalities [5-9].

Platelets are blood cells that are especially important in hemostasis. Larger platelets are thought to have granules with more mediators and to be more active. MPV is the indicator most commonly used as an activation marker in past studies. Increased MPV has been associated with coronary heart disease, diabetes mellitus, atherosclerosis, hypertension, and Polycytic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) in particular [10-19]. Changes in platelet activity and volume in normal and complicated pregnancy (especially preeclampsia and intrauterine growth retardation) have been evaluated in a large number of studies [14]. However, there are only a few studies on using MPV evaluation to predicting miscarriages.

The aim of our study was to evaluate the place of MPV in predicting miscarriage following biochemical or chemical pregnancy.

Material and method

Study design

We retrospectively evaluated the hospital records of all patients who presented with delayed menstruation to Adiyaman University Medical Faculty Training and Research Hospital’s Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic between January 2013 and January 2014. We first reviewed the files of patients who had been diagnosed with a miscarriage within the identified period. A miscarriage was identified as birth following a pregnancy of under 20 gestational weeks and/or 500 g. A total of 305 females with miscarriage who met the study criteria made up the patient group, and 168 females who had given birth at term without complication made up the control group. The miscarriage group was divided into two subgroups as the biochemical pregnancy (BA) (n=79) and clinical pregnancy (CA) (n=226) groups according to clinical follow-up, laboratory, and ultrasonographic data. The demographic and laboratory values and laboratory values at first presentation (hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit (Htc) level, white blood cell (WBC), number of platelets, MPV, and platelet distribution width (PDW)) were recorded were statistically compared.

We ensured that the control group subjects had first been examined before the 20th gestational weeks.

Descriptions

Pregnancy was diagnosed using maternal blood HCG level and ultrasonographic evaluation. BA was described as miscarriage without any pregnancy-related structure being seen on ultrasonography together with a positive pregnancy test after delayed menstruation. CA was described as the development of pregnancy with an intrauterine location and heartbeat on sonography, followed by miscarriage. Gestational age was determined using the last menstrual date (LMD) and verified with ultrasonographic measurements. Gestational week was calculated based on the first hospital ultrasonographic measurement in women with unknown LMD.

Inclusion criteria

Patients characteristic included age of 18 to 35 years; no smoking or alcohol use; no chronic disease, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, vasculitis, or thyroid disorder; no defined hematological and rheumatological disease; no history of thrombosis or habitual abortion; and no uterine anomaly on ultrasonographic evaluation.

Sample collection and analysis

Blood samples were obtained before the vaginal bleeding in all patients. If HCG doubling-time (for BA group) and ultrasonographic evaluation (for CA group) were not suitable for normal pregnancy course, the patents were accepted abortion. All samples were evaluated within one hour. The MPV and other parameters were studied at the Adiyaman University School of Medicine Department of Biochemistry Laboratory. In all cases, complete blood counts were measured by an automatic blood counter (CELL-DYN Sapphire, Abbott, Illinois, United States) within one hour. All blood samples were received from the antecubital vein into Vacutainer System (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), containing 0.04 ml 7.5% K3 ethylene diamin tetra-acetic acid (K3EDTA). The MPV, Hb, WBC, and Plt range were determined as 6.9-10.6 fl, 11.5-16.5 g/dl, 3.7-10.1×103/mm3, and 155-366×103/mm3, respectively.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed with SPSS software, version 15.0 for Windows (SPSS for Windows, Chicago, IL). Continuous variables were presented as mean ± SD. One-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to analyze the normality of the continuous variables. An independent samples t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare continuous variables where appropriate. Pearson’s correlation test was used for correlation analysis. In order to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of MPV values for predicting spontaneous abortıon, receiver-operator curve (ROC) analysis was performed. A p-value 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.

Results

No significant difference was found in terms of maternal age, gravida, or parity between the miscarriage and control groups (P=0.286, P=0.674, P=0.898, respectively) (Table 1). There was also no statistically significant difference in terms of the WBC count, Hb, Htc, Plt and PDW value (P=0.190, P=138, P=0.240, P=0.146, P=0.125, respectively) (Table 1). The MPV value in the miscarriage group (8.99±1.47 fl) was statistically significantly lower than in the control group (9.66±1.64 fl) (P<0.001) (Table 1). A cut-off value of 9.25 in the ROC analysis performed to investigate the effect of MPV value in predicting miscarriage produced a sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 60%. The area under the curve (AUC) for the MPV 0.621 (95% CI: 58-67%, P<0.001) (Figure 1).

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics and Complete Blood Counts of the Study Populations

Abortion group Control Group

n: 305 n: 168 P
Age (year) (mean ± SD) 27.16±4.59 27.62±4.41 0.286
Gravidy (median (min-max)) 2 (1-8) 2 (1-8) 0.674
Parity (median (min-max)) 1 (0-7) 1 (0-7) 0.898
WBC (103/mm3) 9.04±2.29 9.33±2.41 0.190
Hemoglobin (g/dl) 10.98±1.69 11.21±1,51 0.138
Hematocrit (%) 33.43±4.49 33.92±3.91 0.240
Platelets (103/mm3) 274.24±43.32 267.11±62.65 0.146
PDW (%) 17.31±2.99 17.78±3.28 0.125
MPV (fl) 8.99±1.47 9.66±1.64 <0.001

n: number of patient, SD: standart deviation, WBC: White blood cell, MPV: mean platelet volume, PDW: platelet distribution width.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

ROC curve for MPV in predicting development of miscarriage (AUC: 0.621).

Comparison of the spontaneous miscarriage subgroups of BA and CA with the control group revealed no statistically significant differences in terms of WBC, Hb, Htc, Plt count, and PDW values (P=0.118, P=0.328, P=0.081, P=0.315, P=0.291, respectively). There was, however, a statistically significant difference between the groups for MPV value, with the lowest value in the BA group (P<0.001) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Complete Blood Counts of the Biochemical Abortion, Clinical Abortion and Healthy Control Groups

Biochemical Abortion (mean ± SD) Clinic Abortion (mean ± SD) Control group (mean ± SD) P P*

n 79 226 168
WBC (×103/mm3) 9.39±2.70 8.91±2.11 9.33±2.41 0.118
Hemoglobin (g/dl) 11.00±1.75 10.96±1.68 11.21±1.51 0.328
Hematocrit (%) 34.23±5.54 33.16±4.05 33.92±3.91 0.081
Platelets (×103/mm3) 272.03±44,83 275.02±42.85 267.11±62.65 0.315
PDW (%) 17.21±3.65 17.35±2.73 17.78±3.28 0.291
MPV (fl) 8.64±1.34 9.11±1.49 9.66±1.64 <0.001 1 0.053
2 <0.001
3 0.001

n, number of patient; SD: standart deviation, WBC: White blood cell, MPV: mean platelet volume; PDW: platelet distribution width;

*

1, BA versus CA; 2, BA versus Control group; 3, CA versus control group.

Discussion

Platelets have an anuclear discoid structure and a relatively stable morphology throughout their lives. Recent studies have shown that a change in platelet morphological structure results in a change in platelet activity [17]. Platelet activity can also be changed by various physiological and pharmacological agents. Although the best known platelet functions are protection of vascular integrity and controlling bleeding, platelets also play a role in the physiopathogenesis of thromboembolic disorders [18]. Platelets also serve in the development of the placenta, especially in the remodeling of the maternal spiral artery in obstetric practice [19].

Pregnancy is a hypercoagulability situation. The sensitive role of platelets in maintaining the balance between prothrombotic tendency and placental development is vital for the continuation of a pregnancy [19]. An imbalance can cause an increased hemostatic response. The result would be uteroplacental vascular thrombosis and loss of the pregnancy. Changes in the number and function of platelets have been reported for up to 12 weeks following a miscarriage. However, it was stated that the reason for these changes could be environmental and hormonal factors as well as the pregnancy and miscarriage themselves [20].

Increased platelet volume is a direct indicator of increased platelet synthesis. Increased MPV reflects an increase of active platelets in circulation and in platelet aggregation capacity [21]. Platelets with high MPV are accepted as having more granules containing mediators and being more active. Increased MPV is associated with both arterial and venous vascular pathologies, such as stroke, myocardial infarction, and venous thromboembolism. A close relationship has been shown between high MPV and CHD, DM, atherosclerosis, PCOS, and the complications of these disorders [12,13].

The MPV parameter is included in routine whole blood count requested at patient admission in obstetric practice and does not require an additional cost. Every laboratory has a specific normal range, but there are no generally accepted mean values. On the other hand, the measurement is significantly affected by both environmental and laboratory conditions such as environmental temperature, storage temperature, and time until measurement. It is therefore difficult to determine a general risk cutoff value. However, it is attractive as an indicator because there is no additional procedure or cost. When evaluating MPV, one needs to know whether the patient is suffering from a disorder affecting the number and function of platelets such as aplastic anemia-induced thrombocytopenia, immune thrombocytopenia, or thrombocytosis.

As pregnancy advances, platelet count decreases, with no significant change in MPV [22]. The number and activities of platelets in complicated pregnancies have been evaluated in a large number of studies. Preeclampsia, premature rupture of membranes (PROM), and IUGR are the most commonly studied pregnancy complications. These studies have reported that increased MPV (and therefore increased platelet activity) increases placental platelet aggregation, causing thrombosis and placental deficiency [23,24]. A significant correlation was found between second trimester abnormal uterine Doppler blood flow and MPV changes in retrospective evaluations of patients suffering from pregnancy complications such as preeclampsia and IUGR. This indicates that placental failure starts in the early weeks of pregnancy [25].

Miscarriage is the most common complication of pregnancy and many factors play a role in its etiology. Thrombosis and the resulting placental deficiency are major factors in the etiology of miscarriage. We would normally expect a change in MPV value that is measured in circulation due to the migration of active platelets to the uteroplacental region in miscarriage cases [26]. It has been reported that platelet aggregation and thrombosis during early placental development can cause miscarriage, and this can be associated with high MPV values [27]. However, other articles report no such change [28].

We found the MPV values to be low at hospital presentation in our patients suffering a miscarriage before any relevant clinical findings. The miscarriage group was divided into two subgroups for a more detailed analysis. The group with a miscarriage after biochemical pregnancy had the lowest MPV value. These results can be evaluated from two perspectives. First, platelets with high activity can shift the sensitive balance between placental development and thrombosis development toward thrombosis, which can play a role in miscarriage. Evidence supporting platelet activity as inducing miscarriage by itself is insufficient. However, the relationship between venous thrombosis and increased cardiovascular disease risk should not be ignored [21,29]. Additional factors such as the antiphospholipid syndrome during placental development may also contribute. Second, disorders that develop during the placental development stage increase inflammation, attracting a larger number of active platelets to the region [30]. The result is a decrease in the MPV level in circulation. It is possible that with miscarriages, a larger number of active platelets migrate to the region in earlier gestational weeks. This may be similar to the decrease in MPV during the active period of disorders such as ankylosing spondylitis (AS), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) [17].

Conclusion

In our study, MPV was higher in healthy pregnant women than in women who had suffered miscarriage. On the other hand, MPV was at a low level according to the gestational stage when the miscarriage occurred. We believe that the reason for this is the migration of more active platelets to the uteroplacental region, with a high level of inflammation. However, the presence of overlapping values and its low sensitivity and specificity restrict the use of MPV. Studies on a larger number of cases combining various inflammatory markers can help elucidate the relationship between miscarriage and MPV.

Acknowledgements

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not for-profit sectors.

Disclosure of conflict of interest

None.

References

  • 1.Regan L, Rai R. Epidemiology and the medical causes of miscarriage. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;14:839–854. doi: 10.1053/beog.2000.0123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Goddijn M, Leschot NJ. Genetic aspects of miscarriage. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;14:855–865. doi: 10.1053/beog.2000.0124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, O’Connor JF, Baird DD, Schlatterer JP, Canfield RE, Armstrong EG, Nisula BC. Incidence of early loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:189–194. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198807283190401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wang X, Chen C, Wang L, Chen D, Guang W, French J. Conception, early pregnancy loss, and time to clinical pregnancy: a population-based prospective study. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:577–584. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)04694-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hassanzadeh Nazarabadi M, Raoofian R, Abutorabi R. Balanced Chromosomal Translocations of Parents in Relation to Spontaneous Abortions. J Sci. 2005;16:203–208. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Middeldorp S, Goddijn M. [Recurrent miscarriage and thrombophilia] . Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2006;150:189–193. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Horne AW, Alexander CL. Recurrent miscarriage. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2005;31:103–107. doi: 10.1783/1471189053629428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lee RM, Silver RM. Recurrent pregnancy loss: summary and clinical recommendations. Semin Reprod Med. 2000;18:433–440. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-13733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Niroumanesh S, Mehdipour P, Farajpour A, Darvish S. A cytogenetic study of couples with repeated spontaneous abortions. Annals of Saudi Medicine. 2011;31:77–79. doi: 10.4103/0256-4947.75785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Köşüş N, Köşüş A, Turhan NO. Relationship of ovarian volume with mean platelet volume and lipid profile in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Exp Ther Med. 2011;2:1141–1144. doi: 10.3892/etm.2011.327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ozder A, Eker HH. Investigation of mean platelet volume in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and in subjects with impaired fasting glucose: a cost-effective tool in primary health care? Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014;7:2292–2297. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yuvanc U, Cicek D, Yesilbursa D, Karaagac K, Senturk T, Sigirli D, Cordan J. The Effect of Mean Platelet Volume on One Year Survival and the Need for Revascularization in Myocardial Infarction. MN Cardiology. 2004;11:416–420. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Islamoglu Y, Ertas F, Acet H, Elbey MA, Evliyaogllu O, Tekbas E, Cil H, Atilgan Z, Kaya H, Kayan F, Ülgen MS. The association between mean platelet volume and coronary collateral circulation. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2013;17:276–279. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dundar O, Yoruk P, Tutuncu L, Erikci AA, Muhcu M, Ergur AR, Atay V, Mungen E. Longitudinal study of platelet size changes in gestation and predictive power of elevated MPV in development of pre-eclampsia. Prenat Diagn. 2008;28:1052–1056. doi: 10.1002/pd.2126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kiliçli-Camur N, Demirtunç R, Konuralp C, Eskiser A, Başaran Y. Could mean platelet volume be a predictive marker for acute myocardial infarction? Med Sci Monit. 2005;11:387–392. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pusuroglu H, Cakmak HA, Erturk M, Akgul O, Akkaya E, Tosu AR, Celik O, Gul M, Yildirim A. Assessment of the relation between mean platelet volume, non-dipping blood pressure pattern, and left ventricular mass index in sustained hypertension. Med Sci Monit. 2014;20:2020–2026. doi: 10.12659/MSM.891040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Mikhailidis DP, Kitas GD. Mean platelet volume: a link between thrombosis and inflammation? Curr Pharm Des. 2011;17:47–58. doi: 10.2174/138161211795049804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.McNamee K, Dawood F, Farquharson RG. Thrombophilia and early pregnancy loss. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;26:91–102. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2011.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sato Y, Fujiwara H, Konishi I. Role of platelets in placentation. Med Mol Morphol. 2010;43:129–133. doi: 10.1007/s00795-010-0508-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rai R, Shlebak A, Cohen H, Backos M, Holmes Z, Marriott K, Regan L. Factor V Leiden and acquired activated protein C resistance among 1000 women with recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:961–965. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.5.961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Braekkan SK, Mathiesen EB, Njolstad I, Wilsgaard T, Stormer J, Hansen JB. Mean platelet volume is a risk factor for venous thromboembolism: the Tromso study. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8:157–162. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03498.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lamparelli RD, Baynes RD, Atkinson P, Bezwoda WR, Mendelow BV. Platelet parameters. Platelet counts and mean platelet volume in normal and pregnant subjects. S Afr Med J. 1988;73:36–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kanat-Pektas M, Yesildager U, Tuncer N, Arioz DT, Nadirgil-Koken G, Yilmazer M. Could mean platelet volume in late first trimester of pregnancy predict intrauterine growth restriction and pre-eclampsia? J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014;40:1840–1845. doi: 10.1111/jog.12433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cekmez F, Tanju IA, Canpolat FE, AydInoz S, Aydemir G, Karademir F, Sarici SU. Mean platelet volume in very preterm infants: a predictor of morbidities? Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2013;17:134–137. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Missfelder-Lobos H, Teran E, Lees C, Albaiges G, Nicolaides KH. Platelet changes and subsequent development of pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction in women with abnormal uterine artery Doppler screening. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19:443–448. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00672.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shaifali D, Sudesh A, Monica S, Rekha C, Rashmi J, Saroj S, Lata SS. Predictive Value of Platelet Indices in Development of Preeclampsia. Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2012;4:17. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kim KY, Kim KE, Kim KH. Mean platelet volume in normal state and in various clinical disorders. Yonsei Med J. 1986;27:219–226. doi: 10.3349/ymj.1986.27.3.219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Eroglu M, Keskin U, Yildirim AI, Saygi IA, Gun I, Topuz S. Can mean platelet volume predict abortion? Med Glas (Zenica) 2013;10:283–287. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chu SG, Becker RC, Berger PB, Bhatt DL, Eikelboom JW, Konkle B, Mohler ER, Reilly MP, Berger JS. Mean platelet volume as a predictor of cardiovascular risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8:148–156. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03584.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mor G, Cardenas I, Abrahams V, Guller S. Inflammation and pregnancy: the role of the immune system at the implantation site. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011;1221:80–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05938.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of e-Century Publishing Corporation

RESOURCES