Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 10.
Published in final edited form as: Bioorg Med Chem. 2014 Mar 3;22(7):2113–2122. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2014.02.033

Antiproliferative activities of halogenated thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidines

Kartik W Temburnikar a, Sarah C Zimmermann a, Nathaniel T Kim a, Christina R Ross b, Christopher Gelbmann d, Christine E Salomon d, Gerald M Wilson b, Jan Balzarini c, Katherine L Seley-Radtke a,*
PMCID: PMC4565497  NIHMSID: NIHMS718792  PMID: 24631358

Abstract

The in vitro evaluation of thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidines identified halogenated compounds 1 and 2 with antiproliferative activity against three different cancer cell lines. A structure activity relationship study indicated the necessity of the chlorine at the C4-position for biological activity. The two most active compounds 1 and 2 were found to induce apoptosis in the leukemia L1210 cell line. Additionally, the compounds were screened against a variety of other microbial targets and as a result, selective activity against several fungi was also observed. The synthesis and preliminary biological results are reported herein.

Keywords: Thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine; Heterocyclic chemistry; Cytostatic; Apoptosis; Antifungal

1. Introduction

Fused bicyclic pyrimidines, such as the thieno- and pyrrolopyrimidines, are attractive scaffolds for drug design due to their close resemblance to the purines, arguably the most biologically significant class of bicyclic heterocyclic compounds.15 Previously, Klein et al. explored the properties of the thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine scaffold as nucleoside isosteres. Compounds containing the thienopyrimidine moiety exhibited moderate activity against tumor cell proliferation in vitro.3,6 In the ensuing years, various thienopyrimidine analogues attracted additional attention due to the broad spectrum of biological properties they exhibited.720 With a variety of annulations and functional group manipulations possible, many thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine derivatives have shown interesting biological activity including as kinase1720 and phosphodiesterase9 inhibitors (Fig. 1), among other uses.2123 Moreover, the thiophene ring itself has served as an isostere for benzene-fused pyrimidines in the design of molecules that possess antimalarial13 and kinase inhibitory14 activity.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine scaffold in drug design.

Our laboratory has long been interested in the design, synthesis and medicinal properties of sulfur-containing tricyclic heterocycles whereby a thiophene ring has been introduced as a spacer between the imidazole and pyrimidine of the purine scaffold (Fig. 2).11,2427 Notably, several thiophene-expanded purine tricyclic analogues related to those shown in Figure 2, exhibited inhibitory activity against colorectal cancer cell proliferation and trypanosomes.11,27 As an extension of this early work, the synthesis and biological evaluation of several thiophene ‘extended’ pyrimidine nucleosides was pursued.28,29

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine as a component of the nucleobase scaffold.

During the course of the investigation, key intermediates, including the heterocyclic bases, were subjected to broad screen biological testing. Although the original purpose was to explore the biological properties of the nucleosides,28 the halogenated thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine intermediates 1 and 2 were found to exhibit antiproliferative properties against several cancer cell lines. Furthermore, the cell cycle and apoptosis studies revealed their ability to induce apoptosis independent of cell cycle. In addition, evaluations of their antimicrobial activity lead to selective inhibition of clinical strains of Cryptococcus neoformans. Since 1 and 2 are reaction intermediates, their syntheses had been reported previously,23 however a search of the literature revealed that surprisingly, there were no reports of biological activity, including against cancer. Herein we describe a structure activity relationship study for a series of thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine analogues that facilitated identification of core functional groups responsible for their biological activity.

2. Results

2.1. Chemistry

The thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidines were realized by synthesizing thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidin-2,4-dione 4 through a ring-cyclization of 2-methyl-3-aminothiophene carboxylate 3 (Scheme 1).2123 Subsequently, thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidin-2,4-dione 4 was subjected to chlorination by refluxing in phosphorous oxychloride (POCl3)30 for 20–24 h, at which point the POCl3 was removed and the reaction mixture neutralized using saturated sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) followed by crystallization of 1 from ethyl acetate (EtOAc). The chlorinated intermediate 1 was then subjected to various nucleophilic substitutions as shown in Scheme 1. Hydrogenation of 1 under basic conditions afforded the dehalogenated product 5 in 80% yield.31 Interestingly, the rate of dehalogenation in the presence of N,N-diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA) was faster when compared to sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3). It should be noted that even with prolonged hydrogenation conditions, loss of the 2-Cl did not occur, implying that the C-2 position is fairly unreactive.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Synthesis of substituted thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidines

Next, stirring 1 in methanolic ammonia at room temperature resulted in substitution of the 4-Cl group to afford the amino-substituted thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine 6. The progress of the reaction can be monitored by the gradual dissolution of 1 in methanol (MeOH) indicating the successful substitution of the 4-Cl by ammonia. Not surprisingly given our previous observations with the hydrogenation reactions, substitution at the 2-Cl was not observed even at elevated temperatures (80–100 °C) and extended reaction times. Upon stirring 1 with triazole under basic conditions at room temperature, the 4-Cl was successfully substituted by the triazole to give 7 in 86% yield.32

A second series of 7-bromo compounds (Scheme 2) was realized in a similar manner as depicted in Scheme 1. Although the bromine at C7 was originally introduced to enable subsequent Heck coupling and formation of the C-nucleoside targets,28,29 presence of the bromine serendipitously resulted in antiproliferative activity against several cancer cell lines as discussed in the next section. The syntheses of 2, 8, and 9 have been previously reported by Tor et al. for the study of fluorescent nucleoside analogues.23 During the course of our studies however, modifications to their approach23 were undertaken—the bromination was carried out at 90 °C instead of 120 °C and the bromine was added in two portions instead of one, at an interval of 24 h between the additions, to obtain 7-bromothieno[3,2-d]pyrimidin-2,4-dione 8 in 90–95% yields. Additionally, the chlorination reaction was conducted using POCl3 in presence of dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) instead of previously reported23 N,N-dimethylaniline (DMA). This change was introduced to avoid the formation of intractable emulsions that were observed when DMA was used. Furthermore the reflux was stopped after 2 h to obtain 2 in a 60% yield. Substitution of the 4-Cl with a methoxy group was then achieved by refluxing 2 with sodium methoxide in MeOH as reported previously.23 The amine (10) and triazole (11) substitutions were achieved at room temperature in a similar manner as reported for 6 and 7 in Scheme 1, respectively. It should be noted that substitution of the 4-Cl group was quite facile, however the 2-Cl remained unreactive in all cases.33

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Synthesis of 7-bromo analogues.

Next, the preparation of the C-nucleosides was accomplished via Heck coupling of 7-bromo-2,4-dimethoxythieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine 9 with glycal 1229 (Scheme 3) similar to a previous report by Tor et al.23 Several additional steps were added, however, to facilitate purification, thus the syntheses of 15 and 16 were also accomplished. The Heck coupling afforded keto intermediate 13 in 40–55% yield, and subsequent stereoselective reduction of the ketone using sodium triacetoxyborohydride gave 2′-deoxy 14 in 72% yield. Deprotection of the methoxy of 14 using sodium iodide in AcOH resulted in a highly polar product, which was difficult to purify, thus 14 was instead acylated using acetic anhydride32 to afford 15 which was then subjected to hydrolysis of the methoxy groups using sodium iodide in AcOH to afford 16.23 The subsequent purification was facilitated by the presence of acetyl groups on the sugar. Removal of the acetyl groups by methanolic ammonia then afforded nucleoside 17 in a 75% yield (Scheme 3).

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Synthesis of the thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine C-nucleosides.

Based on the promising biological activity of halogenated thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidines 1 and 2, 2,4-dichloropyrrolo[3,2-d]pyrimidine 19 was synthesized (Scheme 4) to evaluate the effect of sulfur and nitrogen in the fused five-membered ring on the biological activity. This was accomplished by preparation of the sodium salt of pyrrolo[3,2-d]pyrimidin-2,4-dione 1830,3436 by stirring with 1 N NaOH at 40 °C followed by heating with phenylphosphonic dichloride (PhPOCl2) at 170–175 °C for 5 h. The hot reaction mixture was poured on ice and upon purification by column chromatography 19 was obtained in 55–60% yield.37

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

Synthesis of halogenated pyrrolo[3,2-d]pyrimidine.

2.2. In vitro tumor cell growth inhibition

The ability of selected compounds to inhibit tumor cell proliferation were tested using L1210, a mouse lymphocytic leukemia cell line38, CCRF-CEM39, an acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell line, and HeLa, a cancer cell line derived from a human cervical adenocarcinoma.40,41 Cell counting assays (Table 1) indicate that the dichloro compounds 1 and 2 are the most active compounds against all three cell lines. As an orthogonal approach, the effects of compounds 1 and 2 on cell viability were also measured using MTT assays in L1210 cells.

Table 1.

Anti-tumor cell activity of test compounds.

graphic file with name nihms-718792-t0001.jpg

Compound Structure m Y Z R IC50a (µM) MICb (µM)


L1210 CEM HeLa HEL Vero HeLa
1 B S Cl Cl H 0.67 ± 0.50 5.2 ± 1.3 3.9 ± 0.5 100 20 4
2 B S Cl Cl Br 5.4 ± 1.2 14 ± 9 4.3 ± 0.2 20 20 20
4 A S H >250 >250 >250 NTc NT NT
5 B S H Cl H >250 >250 >250 NT NT NT
6 B S NH2 Cl H >250 >250 >250 NT NT NT
7 B S graphic file with name nihms-718792-t0002.jpg Cl H >250 >250 >250 NT NT NT
8 A S Br >250 >250 >250 NT NT NT
9 B S OCH3 OCH3 Br >250 ≥ 250 203 ± 61 NT NT NT
10 B S NH2 Cl Br 150 ± 14.0 109 ± 15.0 96 ± 6.0 NT NT NT
11 B S graphic file with name nihms-718792-t0003.jpg Cl Br 157 ± 0 84 ± 12.0 116 ± 8.0 NT NT NT
13 B S OCH3 OCH3 graphic file with name nihms-718792-t0004.jpg >250 >250 >250 NT NT NT
14 B S OCH3 OCH3 graphic file with name nihms-718792-t0005.jpg >250 >250 >250 NT NT NT
15 B S OCH3 OCH3 graphic file with name nihms-718792-t0006.jpg >250 >250 >250 NT NT NT
17 A S graphic file with name nihms-718792-t0007.jpg >250 >250 >250 NT NT NT
19 B NH Cl Cl H 6.8 ± 2.8 25 ± 2.0 19 ± 3.0 20 ≥20 20
5FU 0.33 ± 0.17 18 ± 5 0.54 ± 0.12 NT NT NT
a

50% inhibitory concentration.

b

Minimum concentration for inhibition by 99%. 5FU-5-fluoro Uracil.

c

NT - Not tested.

These assays monitor cellular metabolic activity rather than cell number, but yielded very similar IC50 values for both compounds (cf. Fig. 3 versus Table 1). Replacement of 4-Cl with hydrogen (5) leads to complete loss of cytotoxic activity indicating the necessity of 4-Cl for activity (Table 1). Similarly, substitution of 4-Cl by an amine or triazole leads to complete loss of activity as in the case of 6 and 7. However, with a 7-Br group, the amino 10 and triazolo 11 derivatives retained some activity, albeit modest. The presence of a carbonyl group as in the case of 4, 8, and 17 also did not result in antiproliferative activity. The nucleoside analogues 1315, and 17 were also tested, but none inhibited the growth of the cancer cell lines. These results lend credence to the importance of the 4-Cl group on the nucleobase (Fig. 4).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

MTT assays of cytotoxicity by 1 and 2 in L1210 cells. L1210 cells were treated with selected concentrations of compounds 1 (a) and 2 (b). After 48 h, cell viability was measured using MTT assays. Compound cytotoxicity was calculated by non-linear regression to a sigmoidal dose response function and is quoted as the IC50.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Structure–activity relationship (SAR) for halogenated thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidines.

Furthermore, replacement of the sulfur with nitrogen in the fused five-membered ring (19) leads to loss of activity by a factor of 5-10 although the dichloropyrrolo[3,2-d]pyrimidine retained some activity, thereby further alluding to the role of the 4-Cl group. Thus, preliminary conclusions were (i) that the 4-Cl appears to be critical for cytostatic activity; (ii) that the presence of the sulfur enhances the activity by a factor of 5–10 and (iii) bromine imparts modest cytotoxic properties in the absence of the 4-Cl group (Fig. 4).

As previously mentioned, the thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine scaffold has been used extensively in the design of kinase inhibitors, and has also been associated with excellent anticancer properties.1720 As a result compounds 1 and 2 were screened against twenty kinases at 5 μM using Invitrogen’s Select Screen® kinase profiling42 service (S1) to explore the possibility of kinase inhibition by the halogenated thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidines. Surprisingly they did not exhibit inhibitory activity against any of the twenty tested kinases, suggesting that the antiproliferative activity may be due to other mechanisms. As a result, the lack of inhibitory activity against the kinases opened up an array of alternative possibilities for the mechanism of action of the antiproliferative activity of 1 and 2. In that regard, to gain further insight into the molecular mechanism(s) of action, cell-cycle analysis and apoptosis studies were undertaken.

Many antineoplastic compounds arrest cell proliferation by activating specific checkpoints that block progression through the cell cycle.43 To test whether compounds 1 or 2 inhibited cell proliferation by this mechanism, we monitored their effects on L1210 cell cycle distributions using propidium iodide staining and flow cytometry (Fig. 5). Vehicle-treated cells were largely confined to G1 and S phases, with very small (<5%) subpopulations in the G2/M phase or showing sub-(<G1) or super-genomic (>G2) DNA content. Surprisingly, 24 h or 48 h treatment with IC50 concentrations of either compound 1 or 2 yielded no substantial changes in L1210 cell cycle distribution, indicating that these reagents do not suppress cell growth by activating cell cycle checkpoint mechanisms.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Cell cycle analyses of L1210 cells following treatment with 1 and 2. Cell cycle distributions of L1210 cells after 48 h in the presence of 0.32 μM compound 1, 5.4 μM compound 2, or vehicle control (DMSO) analyzed by flow cytometry of fixed, propidium iodide-stained cells. A minimum of 3000 cells were analyzed per cell population. Each bar represents the mean ± SD across 4 independent cell samples.

Subsequently, unfixed L1210 cell samples were analyzed by staining with Annexin V and 7-amino-actinomycin D (7-AAD) to identify potential cell death pathways that may be activated by either compound. Flow cytometric analyses of cells treated with vehicle for 48 h indicated that the vast majority were non-apoptotic and non-necrotic (Fig. 6a and c, Annexin V negative, 7-AAD negative). However, after incubation with 1 μM compound 1 for 48 h, 60% of the cells were observed undergoing apoptotic cell death, with the vast majority of these in early apoptosis (Fig. 6b, Annexin V positive, 7-AAD negative). Cell death consistent with apoptosis was also evident it L1210 cells treated with 5.4 μM solution of 2 were 55% of cells were Annexin V positive (Fig.6d), although a larger proportion of these (40%) were also 7-AAD positive, consistent with late apoptosis. Together, the cell cycle and apoptosis assays indicate that both compounds 1 and 2 can induce cell death by an apoptotic-like pathway, but in a manner that does not require arrest at a specific stage of the cell cycle.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Apoptosis study on L1210 cell line. L1210 cells treated with (a) an equal volume of vehicle or (b) 1 μM compound 1. Similarly, L1210 cells were treated with (c) an equal volume of vehicle or (d) 5.4 μM compound 2. After 48 h, cells were stained using Annexin V and 7-ADD and analyzed by flow cytometry. A minimum of 10,000 cells were analyzed per condition, and subdivided into four categories: non-apoptotic/necrotic (bottom left), early apoptotic (bottom right), late apoptotic/necrotic (top right), and necrotic (top left). Percentages of total cells detected in each quadrant are indicated.

2.3. Evaluation of antimicrobial activity in vitro

Several of the compounds were tested for inhibitory activity against a variety of DNA and RNA viral strains. However, the antiviral activity of the halogenated compounds 1 and 2 could often not be fully evaluated because of their pronounced cytotoxicity against the mammalian host cell cultures while the other compounds did not exhibit significant antiviral activity.

In the subsequent antimicrobial testing, 1, 2, 5 and 19 were screened for growth inhibition activity against a panel of bacteria and fungi at a concentration of 100 μM as shown in Table 2. Compound 5 was included to test the importance of the 4-Cl substituent for activity across a broader range of biological systems. Compounds 1 and 2 exhibited activity against several pathogenic yeast strains (55–99% growth inhibition) and compound 1 also showed weak activity against Bacillus subtilis. In addition, 1 displayed a higher potency than 2 against several clinical strains of Cryptococcus neoformans.

Table 2.

Antimicrobial screening of thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidines.

Microbial strain Strain designation % inhibition at 100 µM

graphic file with name nihms-718792-t0008.jpg graphic file with name nihms-718792-t0009.jpg graphic file with name nihms-718792-t0010.jpg graphic file with name nihms-718792-t0011.jpg
Bacterial strains
Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 NA NA NA NA
Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633 43% NA NA NA
Staphylococcus aureus subsp. aureus (MRSA) ATCC 43300 NA NA NA NA
Enterococcus faecalis (VRE) ATCC 51299 NA NA NT NT
Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 NA NA NT NT
Fungal strains
Candida albicans ATCC 10231 99% 99% NA NA
Cryptococcus neoformans ATCC 66031 101% 55% NA NA
C. neoformans JEC20 100% 91% NA NA
C. neoformans VANC-R265 93% 67% NA NA
C. neoformans B4546 96% 82% NA NA

NA: No activity, NT: Not tested.

Compounds 1 and 2 were further tested against the susceptible fungal strains to determine the MIC95 values (Table 2). Although the spectrum of anti-microbial activity for 1 is broad (Table 3), the bromo analogue 2 is much more selective towards fungi and 2–5 times more potent than 1 (Table 3).

Table 3.

Antifungal activity of thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidines 1 and 2

strain MIC95 (µM)

graphic file with name nihms-718792-t0012.jpg graphic file with name nihms-718792-t0013.jpg
C. albicans ATCC 10231 23.4 10.7
C. neoformans JEC20 16.6 5.8
C. neoformans B4546 34.6 7.0

MIC95: minimum concentration for inhibition by 95%. The positive control antibiotic for the antibacterial assays was tetracycline (50 µg/mL for P. aeruginosa and 10 µg/mL for all other strains). The control antifungal compound was amphotericin B (2 µg/mL). All positive control experiments exhibited 93–100% cell death.

3. Discussion

Traditionally, halogens have been introduced on organic molecules to facilitate functional group conversions for nucleophilic substitution reactions.44 In that regard, the halogens on 1 and 2 were originally intended to be replaced by a amine (6, 10), triazole (7, 11) or methoxide (9) group thus making them key reaction intermediates. The serendipitous discovery that these intermediates exhibited antiproliferative properties is an important new lead for drug design and the study of alternative cell-death pathways. From the studies discussed herein, it is clear that the presence of the halogens imparts important antiproliferative properties to the thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine scaffold. This may be due to the electrophilic nature of the 4-Cl group.

Another interesting observation for the active thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidines 1 and 2 is that they induce cell-cycle independent apoptosis. Owing to the 4-Cl rendering the C-4 electrophilic, we expected these compounds to exhibit cytotoxic properties similar to DNA alkylating agents.43,45 Typically, DNA damage leads to arresting the cell in a specific cycle that may lead to apoptosis depending upon the nature of the damage.46 To our surprise, 1 and 2 did not lead to cell-cycle arrest but still induced apoptosis. Apoptosis with-out cell cycle arrest generally occurs in the event of cellular stress affecting cytoplasmic p53.47 However, p53 is mutated in L1210 cells,48,49 suggesting that these compounds likely induce apoptosis by a p53-independent mechanism. Alternatively, autophagy and necrotic cell death are also possibilities,50 however, the absence of a signal in the upper left quadrant of the apoptosis graph (Fig. 6, Annexin V negative, 7-AAD positive) minimizes the likelihood that the cytotoxic effects of 1 and 2 on L1210 cells is mediated by a necrotic mechanism. Given the intense clinical interest in identifying new therapeutic strategies that can circumvent the profound inhibition of apoptotic signaling common among aggressive cancers,5154 these compounds may prove to be interesting leads to further study the biological targets of cytotoxicity and cell death.

Furthermore, both 1 and 2 also selectively inhibited the growth of several strains of yeast (C. albicans and C. neoformans) which are important fungal pathogens, particularly among immunocompromised patients. Thus these compounds may provide a new lead for the development of antifungal therapeutics with potentially novel mechanisms of action.

4. Summary

We have identified a set of halogenated thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidines that possess selective antiproliferative properties against cancer cells and fungi, as well as to induce cell-cycle-independent apoptosis. These results render them of interest to further study their cytotoxicity against cancer cells and to elucidate alternative cell death pathways. Finally, although the role of the 4-Cl group for these compounds has been established herein, the role of the 2-Cl and 7-Br groups remains unclear. Thus, future efforts will investigate the role, if any, the 2-Cl and 7-Br groups play in the biological properties of the thienopyrimidine scaffold.

5. Experimental section

5.1. Synthetic methods

5.1.1. General

All chemicals and reagents listed in this section were purchased through commercially available sources unless otherwise noted. All reactions run in CH2Cl2, CH3CN, and THF were obtained from a solvent purification system (SPS, Model: mBraun Labmaster 130). All reactions run in anhydrous DMF, MeOH and pyridine were obtained from Sigma–Aldrich or Acros Organics. All 1H and 13C NMR spectra were obtained from a JEOL ECX 400 MHz NMR. All 1H and 13C NMR spectra were referenced to internal tetramethylsilane (TMS) at 0.0 ppm. The spin multiplicities are indicated by the symbols s (singlet), d (doublet), dd (doublet of doublets), t (triplet), q (quartet), m (multiplet), and br (broad). All NMR solvents were obtained from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories. All reactions were monitored by thin layer chromatography (TLC) on 0.25 mm precoated glass plates. All column chromatography was run on 32–63 μ silica gel obtained from Dynamic Adsorptions Inc. (Norcross, GA, USA). Melting points are uncorrected. Yields refer to chromatographically and spectroscopically (1H and 13C NMR) homogeneous materials. All mass spectra (MS) were recorded and obtained from the University of Maryland Baltimore County Mass Spectrometry Facility and Johns Hopkins Mass Spectrometry Facility. The FAB mass spectra were obtained using double focusing magnetic sector mass spectrometer equipped with a Cs ion gun and fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance equipped with ESI source.

5.1.1.1. Thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidin-2,4(1H,3H)-dione (4)

In a dry flask methyl-3-amino-2-thiophene carboxylate 3 (5.00 g, 31.80 mmol) was dissolved in acetic acid (100 mL) to obtain a yellow solution to which potassium cyanate (10.31 g, 127.30 mmol) dissolved in water (80 mL) was added dropwise over 3 h. The resultant suspension was stirred overnight (16 h) at which point the suspension was filtered. The white solid residue was dissolved in 2 N NaOH (80 mL) by warming to 70 °C. The clear solution was then acidified by AcOH (pH 4–5), the resulting white precipitate was filtered, washed with water then acetone and dried to obtain 4 as a white solid (3.80 g, 22.60 mmol, 71%). Spectroscopy data agrees with literature.2123

5.1.1.2. 2,4-Dichlorothieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine (1)

In a dry flask, thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidin-2,4(1H,3H)-dione 4 (4.00 g, 23.78 mmol) was refluxed in freshly distilled POCl3 (50 mL) under nitrogen overnight (16 h) at which point the POCl3 was evaporated and the residue extracted with CH2Cl2 (50 mL). The organic layer was washed with saturated NaHCO3 solution (50 mL), brine (50 mL), dried over MgSO4 and concentrated. The residue was crystallized from EtOAc to obtain 1 as a pale green-yellow solid (4.00 g, 19.50 mmol, 82%). Mp: 135–137 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.55 (d, 1H, J = 5.0 Hz), 8.12 (d, 1H, J = 5.5 Hz). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 124.6, 129.4, 139.3, 155.8, 156.3, 163.5. FAB-MS m/z for C6H2Cl2N2S calculated [M+H]+ 204.9388, found 204.9400 (2x35Cl), 206.9366 (35Cl 37Cl).

5.1.1.3. 2-Chlorothieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine (5)

To a solution of 2,4-dichloro-thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine 1 (300 mg, 1.46 mmol) in EtOAc, DIPEA (0.52 mL, 2.92 mmol) was added, followed by 10% Pd/C (300 mg) and the suspension shaken in a Parr hydrogenator at 45 psi of H2 pressure for 5 h. The reaction mixture was filtered over celite, the filtrate evaporated and the crude material loaded onto silica. The crude reaction mixture was purified using column chromatography eluting with 9:1 hexanes/EtOAc to obtain 5 as an off-white solid (200 mg, 1.17 mmol, 80%). Rf 0.1 in 9:1 hexanes/EtOAc. Mp 166.3–169.6 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.47 (d, 1H, J = 5.5 Hz), 8.00 (d, 1H, J = 5.0 Hz), 9.11 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 123.8, 129.8, 139.1, 153.6, 157.5, 163.1. FAB-MS m/z for C6H3ClN2S calculated [M+H]+ 170.9778, found 170.9784 (35Cl), 170.9766 (37Cl).

5.1.1.4. 4-Amino-2-chlorothieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine (6)

In a glas tube 2,4-dichlorothieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine (800 mg, 3.90 mmol) was suspended in MeOH (10 mL) and cooled to −60 to −70 °C upon which ammonia was bubbled in the suspension. The glass tube was sealed and the suspension stirred at room temperature overnight to obtain a clear solution. The solvent was evaporated and the resulting crude compound was purified using column chromatography eluting first with 9:1 hexanes/EtOAc, followed by 8:2 hexanes/EtOAc to obtain 6 as an off-white solid (575 mg, 3.10 mmol, 80%). Rf0.2 in 3:1 hexanes/EtOAc. Mp 272.3–274.2 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 7.73 (d, 1H, J = 5.0 Hz), 8.38 (br s, 2H, NH2), 8.60 (d, 1H, J = 5.5 Hz). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 114.2, 124.7, 136.6, 157.7, 160.6, 162.4. FAB-MS m/z for C6H4ClN3S calculated [M+H]+ 185.9887, found 185.9895 (35Cl), 187.9861 (37Cl).

5.1.1.5. 2-Chloro-4-[1,2,4-triazolo]thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine (7)

To solution of 2,4-dichlorothieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine 1 (250 mg, 1.22 mmol) in CH3CN, 1,2,4-triazole (255 mg, 3.69 mmol), Et3N (1 mL, 7.38 mmol) were added and stirred overnight upon which a thick white precipitate was obtained. The reaction mixture was loaded onto silica and product purified using column chromatography eluting with 19:1, followed by 9:1 and and 8:2 hexanes/EtOAc to obtain 7 as a white solid (250 mg, 1.05 mmol, 86%). Rf0.4 in 4:1 hexanes/EtOAc. Mp 205.6–207.1 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.21 (d, 1H, J = 5.5 Hz), 7.87 (d, 1H, J = 5.5 Hz), 7.92 (s, 1H), 9.05 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 117.1, 124.0, 142.6, 143.1, 150.7, 154.0, 156.0, 166.3. FAB-MS m/z for C8H4ClN5S calculated [M+H]+ 237.9948, found 237.9954 (35Cl), 239.9926 (37Cl).

5.1.1.6. 7-Bromo-thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidin-2,4 (1H, 3H)-dione (8)

To 100 mL glass tube containing thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidin-2,4-dione 1 (5.88 g, 34.86 mmol), AcOH (60 mL) and bromine (3.6 mL, 69.72 mmol) were added and the tube capped. The sealed tube was stirred in a preheated oil bath at 90 °C for 24 h. An additional portion of bromine (3.6 mL, 69.72 mmol) was added to the sealed tube and mixture stirred for another 24 h at 90 °C. The AcOH was evaporated to obtain a solid residue to which water was added (200 mL) and the suspension filtered and residue washed repeatedly with water and dried under vacuum to obtain 8 as an off-white solid (8.07 g, 32.67 mmol, 94%). Mp 251.0–252.9 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.22 (s, 1H), 11.40 (br s, 1H, NH), 11.58 (br s, 1H, NH). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 99.6, 112.1, 133.4, 145.1, 152.1, 159.0. FAB-MS m/z for C6H3BrN2O2S calculated [M+H]+ 246.9171, found 246.9175 (79Br), 248.9161 (81Br).

5.1.1.7. 7-Bromo-2,4-dichlorothieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine (2)

To a round bottom flask containing 7-bromothieno[3,2-d]pyrimidin-2,4-dione 8 (4.07 g, 16.47 mmol), DMAP (8.38 g, 68.76 mmol) and freshly distilled POCl3 were added and the suspension stirred at 105–110 °C for 2 h under nitrogen. The POCl3 was evaporated and the residue extracted with CH2Cl2 (300 mL). The organic layer was washed with aq NaHCO3 (300 mL), brine (200 mL) and dried over MgSO4. The dried organic layer was concentrated, loaded on silica and the product purified using column chromatography eluting with 19:1 hexanes:EtOAc to obtain 2 as a white solid (3.41 g, 12.00 mmol, 73%). Rf0.5 in 9:1 hexanes/EtOAc. Mp 180.2–183.0 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.13 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 160.0, 158.0, 156.0, 135.0, 128.0, 109.5. FAB-MS m/z for C6HBrCl2N2S calculated [M+H]+ 282.8493, found 282.8495 (2x35Cl, 79Br), 284.8468 (2x35Cl, 81Br), 286.8443 (35Cl, 37Cl, 81Br), 288.8419 (2x37Cl, 81Br).

5.1.1.8. 7-Bromo-2,4-dimethoxythieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine (9)

To a solution of 7-bromo-2,4-dichlorothieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine 2 (3.6 g, 12.6 mmol) in anhydrous MeOH, 30% NaOMe solution (10 mL, 2.90 g, 54.5 mmol) was added and the reaction mixture was refluxed overnight (16 h). TLC indicated the absence of starting material upon which the reaction mixture was neutralized (pH 7–8) using 2 M HCl followed by removal of MeOH in vacuo. The product was extracted with CH2Cl2 (300 mL) and the organic layer washed with water (300 mL) and brine (300 mL). The CH2Cl2 was evaporated completely and to the residue EtOAc was added to obtain slurry that was heated to reflux and cooled to get a white precipitate. The precipitate was filtered to obtain 9 as a white granular solid (2.40 g, 8.72 mmol, 69%). Rf0.5 in 9:1 hexanes/EtOAc. Mp 193–195 °C. The spectral data was in agreement with the reported data.23 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 4.10 (s, 3H), 4.14 (s, 3H), 7.76 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 54.9, 55.4, 108.7, 111.4, 131.2, 159.8, 164.9, 166.2. FAB-MS m/z for C8H7BrN2O2S calculated [M+H]+ 274.9484, found 274.9490 (79Br), 276.9473 (81Br).

5.1.1.9. 4-Amino-7-bromo-2-chlorothieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine (10)

In a glass tube 7-bromo-2,4-dichloro thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine 2 (100 mg, 0.35 mmol) was suspended in MeOH (10 mL) and cooled to −60 to −70 °C at which point ammonia was bubbled in the suspension. The glass tube was sealed and the suspension stirred at room temperature overnight (16 h) to obtain a clear solution. The solvent was evaporated and the resulting crude compound was purified using column chromatography eluting first with 9:1 hexanes/EtOAc, followed by 8:2 hexanes/EtOAc to obtain 10 as an off-white solid (65 mg, 0.24 mmol, 68%). Rf0.3 in 3:1 hexanes/EtOAc. Mp 286–287.9 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.97 (br s, 2H, NH2), 9.14 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 108.6, 114.0, 133.5, 158.6, 158.8, 160.8. FAB-MS m/z for C6H3BrClN3S calculated [M+H]+ 263.8992, found 263.9001 (35Cl, 79Br), 265.8974 (35Cl, 81Br), 269.8948 (37Cl, 81Br).

5.1.1.10. 7-Bromo-2-chloro-4-[1,2,4-triazolo]thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine (11)

To solution of 7-bromo-2,4-dichlorothieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine 2 (100 mg, 0.35 mmol) in CH3CN, 1,2,4-triazole (73 mg, 1.05 mmol), Et3N (0.18 mL, 1.26 mmol) were added and stirred overnight at which point a thick white precipitate was obtained. The reaction mixture was loaded onto silica and the product purified using column chromatography eluting with 19:1, then 9:1 and finally 4:1 hexanes/EtOAc to obtain 11 as a white solid (77 mg, 0.24 mmol, 69%). Rf 0.2 in 19:1 hexanes/EtOAc. Mp 224.6–227.9 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.23 (s, 1H), 8.29 (s, 1H), 9.42 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 109.1, 116.5, 139.4, 143.2, 150.5, 154.1, 156.2, 162.8. FAB-MS m/z for C8H3-BrClN5S calculated [M+H]+ 315.9053, found 315.9059 (35Cl, 81Br), 317.9036 (35Cl, 81Br), 319.9009 (37Cl, 81Br).

5.1.1.11. 2,4-Dimethoxy-7-(β-D-glycero-pentofuran-3′-ulos-1′-yl)thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine (13)

In a dry flask 7-bromo-2,4-dimethoxythieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine 9 (1.10 g, 4.01 mmol) was co-evaporated with CH3CN (10 mL) and dried under high vacuum. To this tetra-n-butyl ammonium chloride (7.81 g, 28.1 mmol) was added and the mixture dissolved in DMF (10 mL). To this solution 47.5% Pd(OAc)2 (378 mg, 0.8 mmol) was added followed by NaH-CO3 (674 mg, 8.02 mmol) under nitrogen. In a separate flask, glycal (2.13 g, 6.01 mmol) was co-evaporated with CH3CN (10 mL) and dissolved in DMF (10 mL). A solution of glycal in DMF was added to the previous solution and the mixture stirred at 40 °C for 48 h under nitrogen until the TLC indicated the absence of starting materials. The reaction mixture was evaporated, the residue dissolved in CH2Cl2 (50 mL) and the Pd filtered over celite. The organic layer was loaded on silica and the product purified using column chromatography eluting with 3:1 hexanes/EtOAc to afford 13 as a pale yellow solid (650 mg, 2.09 mmol, 52%). Mp 123.2–126.9 °C. Rf 0.4 in 1:1 hexanes/EtOAc. The spectral data was in agreement with literature values.23 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.80 (dd, 1H, J = 6.4 Hz, J = 17.6 Hz), 3.23 (dd, 1H, J = 11.0 Hz, J = 17.6 Hz), 3.96–3.98 (br m, 2H), 4.03 (s, 3H), 4.10 (t, 1H, J = 2.3 Hz), 4.16 (s, 3H), 4.89 (br d, 1H, OH), 5.50 (dd, 1H, J = 6.4 Hz, J = 11.0 Hz), 7.80 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 49.3, 54.5, 55.4, 62.7, 74.0, 82.3, 113.3, 133.4, 133.9, 160.3, 164.0, 166.1, 213.8. FAB-MS m/z for C13H14N2O5S calculated [M+H]+ 311.0696, found 311.0695.

5.1.1.12. 1′-β-[7-(2,4-Dimethoxythieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine)]-2′-deoxyribofuranose (14)

2,4-Dimethoxy-7-(β-D-glyceropentofuran-3′-ulos-1′-yl)thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine 13 (650 mg, 2.09 mmol) was dissolved in a mixture of CH3CN (5 mL) and AcOH (5 mL) under nitrogen. The solution was cooled to −10 to −5 °C after which NaB(OAc)3H (555 mg, 2.62 mmol) was added and stirred at −10 to −5 °C for 1 h. The reaction mixture warmed to room temperature and stirred until the TLC indicated the absence of the starting material. The reaction mixture was concentrated, loaded on silica and purified using column chromatography eluting with 49:1 CH2Cl2/MeOH to afford 14 as yellow solid (470 mg, 1.50 mmol, 72%). Mp 129.7–132.4 °C. Rf 0.4 in 19:1 CH2Cl2/MeOH. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.011 (dd, 1H, J = 5.3 Hz, J = 13.0 Hz), 2.76–2.84 (m, 1H), 3.80 (dd, 1H, J = 1.4 Hz, J = 12.4 Hz), 3.95 (dd, 1H, J = 2.1 Hz, J = 12.1 Hz), 4.06 (s, 3H), 4.18–4.15 (m, 1H), 4.16 (s, 3H), 4.72 (d, 1H, J = 5.0 Hz), 5.46 (dd, 1H, J = 5.5 Hz, J = 11.4 Hz), 7.73 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) 41.9, 54.3, 55.3, 64.0, 75.2, 88.9, 113.2, 133.0, 135.1, 160.6, 163.7, 166.0. FAB-MS m/z for C13H16N2O5S calculated [M+H]+ 313.0853, found 313.0862.

5.1.1.13. 1′-β-[7-(2,4-Dimethoxythieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine)]-3′,5′-acetoxy-2′-deoxyribofuranose (15)

To a solution of 1′-β-[7-(2,4-dimethoxythieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine)]-2′-deoxyribofuranose 14 (470 mg, 1.50 mmol) in pyridine (5 mL), Ac2O (0.28 mL, 3.01 mmol) was added and stirred overnight (16 h) at which point the TLC indicated the absence of starting material. The pyridine was evaporated and the residue co-evaporated with toluene. The residue was then loaded on silica and the product purified using column chromatography eluting with 19:1 then 9:1 hexanes/ EtOAc to give product 15 as a pale yellow solid (570 mg, 1.43 mmol, 95%). Mp 79.6–83.2 °C. Rf 0.2 in 3:1 hexanes/ EtOAc. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.03 (s, 3H), 2.12 (s, 3H), 2.15–2.23 (m, 1H), 2.64 (ddd, 1H, J = 1.4 Hz, J = 5.5 Hz, J = 13.7 Hz), 4.04 (s, 3H), 4.12 (s, 3H), 4.23–4.26 (m, 2H), 4.42 (dd, 1H, J = 3.2, J = 10.3), 5.26 (d, 1H, J = 6.4), 5.46 (dd, 1H, J = 5.5, J = 10.4), 7.73 (d, 1H, J = 1.4). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 20.9, 21.2, 38.8, 54.3, 55.0, 64.3, 76.1, 76.5, 82.4, 112.3, 130.1, 136.4, 160.3, 163.7, 165.8, 170.7, 170.8. FAB-MS m/z for C17H20N2O7S calculated [M+H]+ 397.1064, found 397.1063.

5.1.1.14. 1′-β-[7-(Thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidin-2,4-dione)]-3′, 5′-acetoxy-2′-deoxyribofuranose (16)

To a solution of 1′-β-[7-(2,4-dimethoxythieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine)]-3′,4′-acetoxy-2′-deoxyribofuranose 15 (570 mg, 1.43 mmol) in AcOH, sodium iodide (862 mg, 5.75 mmol) was added and the mixture stirred for 3 h at 58–62 °C during which time the reaction mixture turned a maroon color. The AcOH was evaporated and the residue was extracted with CH2Cl2 (50 mL) and the organic layer washed with water (50 mL), aq NaHCO3 (50 mL), aq Na2S2O3 (25 mL), aq NaCl (50 mL) and then dried over MgSO4. The organic layer was loaded on silica and the product purified by column chromatography eluting with 1:1 hexanes/EtOAc to give 16 as a white solid (500 mg, 1.35 mmol, 95%). Mp 157–162.4 °C. Rf 0.2 in 1:1 hexanes/EtOAc. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.13 (s, 3H), 2.16–2.21 (m, 1H), 2.22 (s, 3H), 2.37 (dd, 1H, J = 5.0, J = 13.7 Hz), 4.26–4.29 (m, 2H), 4.60 (dd, 1H, J = 3.7 Hz, J = 12.8 Hz), 5.20–5.26 (m, 2H), 7.50 (s, 1H), 8.09 (br s, 1H, NH), 9.11 (br s, 1H, NH). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 21.0, 21.1, 39.7, 64.0, 75.9, 76.5, 83.4, 114.1, 128.8, 131.3, 143.7, 151.4, 159.0, 170.7, 170.8. FAB-MS m/z for C15H16N2O7S calculted [M+H]+ 369.0751, found 369.0791.

5.1.1.15. 1′-β-[7-(Thieno[3,2-d] pyrimidin-2,4-dione)]-2′-deoxyribofuranose (17)

A solution of 1′-β-[7-(thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidin-2,4-dione)]-3′,5′-acetoxy-2′-deoxyribofuranose 16 (500 mg, 1.35 mmol) in MeOH (10 mL) was cooled to −60 to −70 °C at which point ammonia was bubbled into the solution. The glass tube was sealed and the reaction mixture stirred at room temperature overnight (16 h). The reaction mixture was concentrated and the residue loaded onto silica. The product was purified by column chromatography eluting with 19:1 CH2Cl2/MeOH to obtain 17 as a white solid (293 mg, 1.03 mmol, 76%). Rf 0.1 in 19:1 CH2Cl2/MeOH. 1H NMR (400 MHz,DMSO-d6): δ 1.96–2.01 (m, 2H), 3.16 (d, 1H, J = 5.0 Hz), 3.57–3.65 (m, 2H), 3.84 (d, 1H, J = 1.8 Hz), 4.26–4.27 (m, 1H), 5.13–5.14 (d, 1H, J = 3.2 Hz, OH), 5.22 (dd, 1H, J = 6.4 Hz, J = 9.4 Hz), 5.76–5.82 (br s, 1H, OH), 7.99 (s, 1H), 11.24–11.26 (br s, 2H, 2 NH). 13C NMR (100 MHz,DMSO-d6): δ 43.0, 62.4, 73.4, 75.7, 88.2, 113.0, 132.0, 132.2, 144.5, 152.0, 159.5. FAB-MS m/z for C11H12N2O5S calculated [M+H]+ 285.0540, found 285.0548.

5.1.1.16. 2,4-Dichloropyrrolo[3,2-d]pyrimidine (19)

To pyrrolo[3,2-d]pyrimidin-2,4-dione 18 (2.00 g, 13.2 mmol), 1 N NaOH (15 mL), and 0.60 g NaOH in 15 mL H2O was added and the mixture stirred at 40 °C until a solution was formed. The solution was then cooled to room temperature (21–25 °C) and then placed in an ice bath to obtain thick slurry. The slurry was then filtered to obtain a pale yellow solid. The solid was dissolved in 1 N NaOH (15 mL), and heated to 40 °C to obtain a clear solution that upon cooling provided white crystals. The crystals were washed with MeOH (20 mL) and acetone (20 mL), and then dried under vacuum. The dry solids were taken in phenylphosphonic dichloride (10 mL) and heated to 170–175 °C for 5 h during which the reaction mixture became a brown–black solution. After 5 h the hot reaction mixture was poured onto ice, extracted with EtOAc (200 mL) and the organic layer washed with sat. NaHCO3 solution (3 × 100 mL) till all effervescence subsided. The organic layer was then washed with brine and dried over MgSO4. The organic layer was concentrated in vacuo and loaded onto silica. The product was purified using column chromatography eluting with 9:1 then 3:1 hexanes/EtOAc to obtain 18 as an off-white solid (1.50 g, 7.9 mmol, 60%). Rf 0.5 in 3:1 hexanes/EtOAc. Mp 228.3–232.0 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6):δ 6.71 (d, 1H, J = 3.2 Hz), 8.09 (d, 1H, J = 2.8 Hz), 12.75 (s, 1H, NH). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 103.2, 124.3, 138.0, 143.5, 149.6, 153.9. ESI-MS m/z for C6H3Cl2N3 calculated [M+H]+ 187.9776, found 187.9777.

5.2. Cytostatic assays

Murine Leukemia L1210, human lymphocytic CEM and human cervix carcinoma HeLa cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) (Rockville, MD). All assays were performed in 96-well microtiter plates. To each well were added (5-7.5) × 104 tumor cells and a given amount of the test compound. The cells were allowed to proliferate for 48 h (murine leukemia L1210 cells) or 72 h (human lymphocytic CEM and human cervix carcinoma HeLa cells) at 37 °C in a humidified CO2-controlled atmosphere. At the end of the incubation period, the cells were counted in a Coulter counter. The IC50 (50% inhibitory concentration) was defined as the concentration of the compound that inhibited cell proliferation by 50%. Orthogonally, cytotoxicity of selected compounds for L1210 cells was assessed by reduction of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT). Here, cells were seeded in 96-well plates at 5 × 103 cells per well and treated with a range of drug concentrations. After 48 h, cell viability was measured using the MTT Cell Proliferation Assay kit (ATCC) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Percent cell viability was analyzed as a function of drug concentrations using a sigmoidal dose response function with PRISM v3.03 software (GraphPad) to resolve IC50 values.

5.3. Cell cycle distribution and apoptosis assays

Cell cycle and apoptosis studies were conducted on L1210, a mouse lymphocytic leukemia cell line obtained from the American Type Culture Collection and grown in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) plus 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). The cell cycle distributions of L1210 cells treated with compounds 1 or 2 were analyzed using propidium iodide staining and flow cytometry. 2 × 106 cells were seeded in 100 mm dishes and treated with vehicle alone or compounds 1 or 2 at the IC50 values determined by cell viability assays or an equivalent volume of DMSO. 48 h following treatment the cells were collected, fixed, and stained with propidium iodide (Sigma Aldrich) as described54 immediately before analysis by flow cytometry. To analyze apoptotic cell death, L1210 cells were seeded as described above but then treated with vehicle alone or compounds 1 or 2 at 1 μM and 5.4 μM, respectively. After 48 h, the cells were then collected and the cellular fractions undergoing early apoptotic, late apoptotic/necrotic, and necrotic cell death were measured by staining with Annexin V and 7-amino- actinomycin D (7-AAD) using the BD Pharmingen PE Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit I (BD Pharmingen) as described.55 All flow cytometry analyses required for cell cycle distribution and apoptosis assays were performed at the University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center Shared Flow Cytometry Facility.

5.4. Antimicrobial assays

Compounds were tested against the following panel of bacteria and fungi purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC): Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) ATCC 43300, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis (VRE) ATCC 51299, Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, Cryptococcus neoformans ATCC 66031 and Candida albicans ATCC 10231. Three clinical isolates of C. neoformans (JEC20, VANC-R265 and B4546) were also tested. S. aureus, B. subtilis, P. aeruginosa and E. coli were grown in BBL™ Trypticase™ Soy Broth (BD) at 37 °C. VRE was grown in brain heart infusion broth (Bacto) at 37 °C and C. albicans and C. neoformans were grown in yeast malt extract medium (Difco) and Sabouraud dextrose broth (Difco), respectively, at 30 °C.

Microbial susceptibility testing was performed using an adaptation of the standard microbroth dilution assay.56 Briefly, bacteria were grown to mid-log phase, diluted with fresh medium to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.030–0.060 and then diluted again 1:10. This suspension (195 μL) was added to wells in a 96 well microtiter plate (Sarstedt) and 5 μL of compound dissolved in DMSO was added to give a final concentration of 100−0.1 μM at 2.5% DMSO by volume. A DMSO negative control and standard antibiotic positive controls were included in each plate. All compounds were tested in triplicate for each concentration. Plates were sealed with parafilm, placed in a Ziploc bag to prevent evaporation, and incubated at 30 °C (fungi) or 37 °C (bacteria) for 16– 20 h (48 h for C. neoformans). The OD600 values for each well were determined with a plate reader (Biotek, EL800) and the data were standardized to the DMSO control wells after subtracting the back-ground from blank medium. Initial single concentrations were tested at 100 μM and active compounds were further tested with at least nine concentrations for a full dose response. Dose response curves were generated using GraphPad Prism 5 software and used to determine the MIC95 concentrations (minimal concentration that inhibits 95% of growth).

Supplementary Material

supplemetary data

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (R01GM073645 KSR). The authors are grateful to Robin Patel for the gift of the clinical isolates of C. neoformans. We also thank Yudi Rusman for his assistance with the antifungal dose response experiments.

Footnotes

Supplementary data

Supplementary data (the 1H, 13C NMR spectra and High Resolution Mass Spectrometry (HRMS) and list of kinases tested for compounds 1–2) associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2014.02.033.

References

  • 1.Amarnath V, Madhav R. Synthesis. 1974:837. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lim M-I, Klein RS, Fox JJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 1980;21:1013. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ren WY, Lim MI, Otter BA, Klein RS. J. Org. Chem. 1982;47:4633. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lim M-I, Klein RS. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981;22:25. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lim MI, Ren WY, Otter BA, Klein RS. J. Org. Chem. 1983;48:780. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ren WY, Rao KVB, Klein RS. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1986;23:1757. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Russell RK, Press JB, Rampulla RA, McNally JJ, Falotico R, Keiser JA, Bright DA, Tobia A. J. Med. Chem. 1988;31:1786. doi: 10.1021/jm00117a019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ife RJ, Brown TH, Blurton P, Keeling DJ, Leach CA, Meeson ML, Parsons ME, Theobald CJ. J. Med. Chem. 1995;38:2763. doi: 10.1021/jm00014a027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Crespo MI, Pages L, Vega A, Segarra V, Lopez M, Domenech T, Miralpeix M, Beleta J, Ryder H, Palacios JM. J. Med. Chem. 1998;41:4021. doi: 10.1021/jm981012m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Showalter HDH, Bridges AJ, Zhou H, Sercel AD, McMichael A, Fry DW. J. Med. Chem. 1999;42:5464. doi: 10.1021/jm9903949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Seley KL, Januszczyk P, Hagos A, Zhang L, Dransfield DT. J. Med. Chem. 2000;43:4877. doi: 10.1021/jm000326i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Munchhof MJ, Beebe JS, Casavant JM, Cooper BA, Doty JL, Higdon RC, Hillerman SM, Soderstrom CI, Knauth EA, Marx MA, Rossi AMK, Sobolov SB, Sun J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004;14:21. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2003.10.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kikuchi H, Yamamoto K, Horoiwa S, Hirai S, Kasahara R, Hariguchi N, Matsumoto M, Oshima Y. J. Med. Chem. 2006;49:4698. doi: 10.1021/jm0601809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hayakawa M, Kaizawa H, Moritomo H, Koizumi T, Ohishi T, Okada M, Ohta M, Tsukamoto S-I, Parker P, Workman P, Waterfield M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006;14:6847. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2006.06.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Folkes AJ, Ahmadi K, Alderton WK, Alix S, Baker SJ, Box G, Chuckowree IS, Clarke PA, Depledge P, Eccles SA, Friedman LS, Hayes A, Hancox TC, Kugendradas A, Lensun L, Moore P, Olivero AG, Pang J, Patel S, Pergl-Wilson GH, Raynaud FI, Robson A, Saghir N, Salphati L, Sohal S, Ultsch MH, Valenti M, Wallweber HJA, Wan NC, Wiesmann C, Workman P, Zhyvoloup A, Zvelebil MJ, Shuttleworth SJ. J. Med. Chem. 2008;51:5522. doi: 10.1021/jm800295d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sutherlin DP, Sampath D, Berry M, Castanedo G, Chang Z, Chuckowree I, Dotson J, Folkes A, Friedman L, Goldsmith R, Heffron T, Lee L, Lesnick J, Lewis C, Mathieu S, Nonomiya J, Olivero A, Pang J, Prior WW, Salphati L, Sideris S, Tian Q, Tsui V, Wan NC, Wang S, Wiesmann C, Wong S, Zhu B-Y. J. Med. Chem. 2010;53:1086. doi: 10.1021/jm901284w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sutherlin DP, Bao L, Berry M, Castanedo G, Chuckowree I, Dotson J, Folks A, Friedman L, Goldsmith R, Gunzner J, Heffron T, Lesnick J, Lewis C, Mathieu S, Murray J, Nonomiya J, Pang J, Pegg N, Prior WW, Rouge L, Salphati L, Sampath D, Tian Q, Tsui V, Wan NC, Wang S, Wei BQ, Wiesmann C, Wu P, Zhu B-Y, Olivero A. J. Med. Chem. 2011;54:7579. doi: 10.1021/jm2009327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wallin JJ, Edgar KA, Guan J, Berry M, Prior WW, Lee L, Lesnick JD, Lewis C, Nonomiya J, Pang J, Salphati L, Olivero AG, Sutherlin DP, O’Brien C, Spoerke JM, Patel S, Lensun L, Kassees R, Ross L, Lackner MR, Sampath D, Belvin M, Friedman LS. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2011;10:2426. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-0446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mathieu S, Gradl SN, Ren L, Wen Z, Aliagas I, Gunzner-Toste J, Lee W, Pulk R, Zhao G, Alicke B, Boggs JW, Buckmelter AJ, Choo EF, Dinkel V, Gloor SL, Gould SE, Hansen JD, Hastings G, Hatzivassiliou G, Laird ER, Moreno D, Ran Y, Voegtli WC, Wenglowsky S, Grina J, Rudolph J. J. Med. Chem. 2012;55:2869. doi: 10.1021/jm300016v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Safina BS, Baker S, Baumgardner M, Blaney PM, Chan BK, Chen Y-H, Cartwright MW, Castanedo G, Chabot C, Cheguillaume AJ, Goldsmith P, Goldstein DM, Goyal B, Hancox T, Handa RK, Iyer PS, Kaur J, Kondru R, Kenny JR, Krintel SL, Li J, Lesnick J, Lucas MC, Lewis C, Mukadam S, Murray J, Nadin AJ, Nonomiya J, Padilla F, Palmer WS, Pang J, Pegg N, Price S, Reif K, Salphati L, Savy PA, Seward EM, Shuttleworth S, Sohal S, Sweeney ZK, Tay S, Tivitmahaisoon P, Waszkowycz B, Wei B, Yue Q, Zhang C, Sutherlin DP. J. Med. Chem. 2012;55:5887. doi: 10.1021/jm3003747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fossey C, Laduree D, Robba M. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids. 1994;13:883. doi: 10.1081/NCN-120022675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fossey C, Landelle H, Laduree D, Robba M. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids. 1994;13:925. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tor Y, Del Valle S, Jaramillo D, Srivatsan SG, Rios A, Weizman H. Tetrahedron. 2007;63:3608. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Seley-Radtke KL, Zhang Z, Wauchope OR, Zimmermann SC, Ivanov A, Korba B. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 2008;52:635. doi: 10.1093/nass/nrn321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhang Z, Wauchope OR, Seley-Radtke KL. Tetrahedron. 2008;64:10791. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2008.09.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wauchope OR, Tomney MJ, Pepper JL, Korba BE, Seley-Radtke KL. Org. Lett. 2010;12:4466. doi: 10.1021/ol101482h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wallace LJM, Candlish D, Hagos A, Seley KL, De Koning HP. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids. 2004;23:1441. doi: 10.1081/NCN-200027660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Temburnikar K, Brace K, Seley-Radtke KL. J. Org. Chem. 2013;78:7305. doi: 10.1021/jo400913k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Temburnikar K, Zhang Z, Seley-Radtke K. Nucleosides, Nucleotides, Nucleic Acids. 2012;31:319. doi: 10.1080/15257770.2012.656212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bourke DG, Burns CJ, Cuzzupe AN, Feutrill JT, Kling MR, Nero TL. Cytopia Research Pty Ltd. Application; Australia; WO: 2009. p. 130. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bravo-Altamirano K, George KM, Frantz M-C, LaValle CR, Tandon M, Leimgruber S, Sharlow ER, Lazo JS, Wang QJ, Wipf P. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2011;2:154. doi: 10.1021/ml100230n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Shi J, Du J, Ma T, Pankiewicz KW, Patterson SE, Tharnish PM, McBrayer TR, Stuyver LJ, Otto MJ, Chu CK, Schinazi RF, Watanabe KA. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2005;13:1641. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2004.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Joule JA, Mills K. Heterocyclic Chemistry. (Fourth) 2000 [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cupps TL, Wise DS, Townsend LB. J. Org. Chem. 1983;48:1060. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Evans GB, Furneaux RH, Hutchison TL, Kezar HS, Morris PE, Jr., Schramm VL, Tyler PC. J. Org. Chem. 2001;66:5723. doi: 10.1021/jo0155613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Guimaraes CRW, Kopecky DJ, Mihalic J, Shen S, Jeffries S, Thibault ST, Chen X, Walker N, Cardozo M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:18139. doi: 10.1021/ja9064359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Girgis NS, Cottam HB, Larson SB, Robins RK. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1987;24:821. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Law LW, Dunn TB, et al. J. Natl. Cancer. Inst. 1949;10:179. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Foley GE, Lazarus H, Farber S, Uzman BG, Boone BA, McCarthy RE. Cancer. 1965;18:522. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(196504)18:4<522::aid-cncr2820180418>3.0.co;2-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Scherer WF, Syverton JT, Gey GO. J. Exp. Med. 1953;97:695. doi: 10.1084/jem.97.5.695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rahbari R, Sheahan T, Modes V, Collier P, Macfarlane C, Badge RM. BioTechniques. 2009;46:277–278. doi: 10.2144/000113089. 280, 282, 284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mollard A, Warner SL, Call LT, Wade ML, Bearss JJ, Verma A, Sharma S, Vankayalapati H, Bearss D. J. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2011;2:907. doi: 10.1021/ml200198x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lemke TL, Williams DA, editors. Foye’s Principles of Medicinal Chemistry. (Fifth) 2002 [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wade LG. Organic Chemistry. (4th) 1998 [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Neidle S, Thurston DE. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2005;5:285. doi: 10.1038/nrc1587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Coleman WB, Tsongalis GJ, editors. The Molecular Basis of Human Cancer. Humana Press; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Maiuri MC, Tasdemir E, Criollo A, Morselli E, Vicencio JM, Carnuccio R, Kroemer G. Cell Death Differ. 2009;16:87. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2008.131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Cory AH, Chen J, Cory JG. Anticancer Res. 2006;26:1289. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sullivan GF, Garcia-Welch A, White E, Lutzker S, Hait WN. J. Exp. Ther. Oncol. 2002;2:19. doi: 10.1046/j.1359-4117.2002.01002.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hanahan D, Weinberg Robert A. Cell. 2011;144:646. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kelly RJ, Lopez-Chavez A, Citrin D, Janik JE, Morris JC. Mol. Cancer. 2011;10:35. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-10-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Eisele G, Weller M. Cancer Lett. 2013;332:335. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2010.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Pore MM, Hiltermann TJN, Kruyt FAE. Cancer Lett. 2013;332:359. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2010.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Richardson A, Kaye SB. Curr. Mol. Pharmacol. 2008;1:244. doi: 10.2174/1874467210801030244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Vermes I, Haanen C, Steffens-Nakken H, Reutelingsperger C. J. Immunol. Methods. 1995;184:39. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(95)00072-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.2004. ‘Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: 14th Informational Supplement’, National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

supplemetary data

RESOURCES