Skip to main content
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology logoLink to American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
. 2015 Jul;53(1):8–13. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2015-0032TR

Noninvasive Imaging of Experimental Lung Fibrosis

Yong Zhou 1,, Huaping Chen 1, Namasivayam Ambalavanan 2, Gang Liu 1, Veena B Antony 1, Qiang Ding 1, Hrudaya Nath 3, Janet F Eary 3, Victor J Thannickal 1
PMCID: PMC4566116  PMID: 25679265

Abstract

Small animal models of lung fibrosis are essential for unraveling the molecular mechanisms underlying human fibrotic lung diseases; additionally, they are useful for preclinical testing of candidate antifibrotic agents. The current end-point measures of experimental lung fibrosis involve labor-intensive histological and biochemical analyses. These measures fail to account for dynamic changes in the disease process in individual animals and are limited by the need for large numbers of animals for longitudinal studies. The emergence of noninvasive imaging technologies provides exciting opportunities to image lung fibrosis in live animals as often as needed and to longitudinally track the efficacy of novel antifibrotic compounds. Data obtained by noninvasive imaging provide complementary information to histological and biochemical measurements. In addition, the use of noninvasive imaging in animal studies reduces animal usage, thus satisfying animal welfare concerns. In this article, we review these new imaging modalities with the potential for evaluation of lung fibrosis in small animal models. Such techniques include micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography (PET), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and multimodal imaging systems including PET/CT and SPECT/CT. It is anticipated that noninvasive imaging will be increasingly used in animal models of fibrosis to gain insights into disease pathogenesis and as preclinical tools to assess drug efficacy.

Keywords: lung fibrosis, small animal models, micro-CT, MRI, nuclear imaging


Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a relentless and invariably fatal fibrotic lung disorder that primarily affects aging adults. A U.S. Food and Drug Administration–approved and effective drug therapy for patients with IPF has only recently become available. Recent phase III clinical trials with pirfenidone and nintedanib (also known as BIBF-1120) in the treatment of IPF suggest that we may be entering a new era of developing novel antifibrotic drug therapies. We currently lack insights into which patients may benefit from these drugs and the extent of clinical benefit that might be expected. Clearly, there is a need for continued research efforts in finding better pharmacologic treatments for fibrotic lung diseases.

Small animal models of lung fibrosis are essential for preclinical evaluation of the efficacy of novel antifibrotic compounds. Animal studies are also important in identification of the molecular mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of fibrotic process, despite their limitation of reproducing the irreversible and progressive nature of human IPF. Current outcome measurements in experimental lung fibrosis involve labor-intensive histological and/or biochemical analyses. These evaluations require killing animals at designated time points, precluding data acquisition of the dynamic nature of the fibrotic process in individual animals. The commonly used measurements of lung fibrosis—hydroxyproline content and morphometric scores—are known to be highly variable among individual animals. To achieve adequate statistical power, a large number of animals is often required, particularly in experiments in which lung fibrosis is assessed at multiple time points.

In humans, characterization of the extent and longitudinal changes of fibrotic lung diseases by noninvasive imaging techniques, such as high-resolution computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET), have been well established. The development of similar, proven imaging techniques optimized for animal imaging provides opportunities to assess lung fibrosis at different time points in living animals and enables each animal to serve as its own control. Noninvasive imaging reduces the number of animals used for experimentation, which satisfies the ethical aspects of using fewer animals and allows for multiple, longitudinal measurements in individual animals. Furthermore, noninvasive imaging does not preclude complementary histological and biochemical measurements after the imaging study and allows the temporal tracking of the efficacy of antifibrotic therapies in a single animal. In this article, we review various noninvasive imaging methods that are currently used for evaluation of lung fibrosis in small animal models. These include micro-CT, MRI, nuclear imaging (specifically PET and single photon emission computed tomography [SPECT]), and multimodal PET/CT and SPECT/CT scans. For a detailed description of the principles of these techniques and their broader applications in lung imaging, we recommend a recent review article by Gammon and colleagues (1).

Micro-CT

Micro-CT imaging uses the inherent contrast between air and tissue in the lung to study lung morphometry and function. The CT density of the lung is currently quantified by Hounsfield units (HUs) in micro-CT scan analysis. HUs define air density as −1,000 and water density as 0. Based on this definition, lung tissues that are less dense than water are represented by <0 HUs, whereas areas with higher density exhibit values >0 on micro-CT images.

Evaluation of Lung Injury and Fibrosis

Micro-CT–based outcome measurements have been validated by comparison to the established histologic and physiologic measurements in animal models of lung injury and fibrosis. In bleomycin (BLM)-induced murine lung damage, Cavanaugh and colleagues (2) reported that higher total percent lung damage with micro-CT measurements correlates with severity of lung damage by histologic analysis. De Langhe and colleagues (3) measured the degree of aerated lung with micro-CT and used micro-CT values as a surrogate marker to evaluate lung fibrosis in BLM-treated mice; they demonstrated that lungs of BLM-treated mice had significantly lower CT scan–derived aerated lung volumes than saline-treated control mice. Additionally, the micro-CT values significantly correlated with the histopathologic scores of fibrosis, total lung collagen content, and measurements of physiologic lung function. A more recent ex vivo study by Scotton and colleagues (4) also demonstrated that high-resolution micro-CT provides a highly sensitive and quantitative measure for BLM-induced lung fibrosis in mice. Rodt and colleagues (5) reported a significant correlation between micro-CT–derived aerated lung volumes and histopathologic scores of fibrosis in an adenoviral TGF-β–induced murine model of lung fibrosis. Shofer and colleagues (6) developed a novel micro-CT technique to measure lung compliance; this innovative methodology was validated by quasistatic compliance measurement with a commercial ventilator system. This latter study suggests that micro-CT may also offer a noninvasive means for quantification of pulmonary physiology.

Inflammation and fibrosis are manifested by relative increases in tissue density with micro-CT scanning. Although micro-CT scans are sensitive enough to detect changes in lung tissue density, the current techniques do not distinguish between lung inflammation and fibrosis. Discrimination of lung inflammation from fibrosis will need subsequent histological analysis and related cellular (e.g., flow cytometric) analyses.

Three-Dimensional Assessment of Lung Fibrosis

Neither histomorphometry nor biochemical analyses provides information on the spatial and temporal distribution of lung fibrosis. Serial micro-CT scanning generates quantitative datasets that can be reconstructed to assess the topographical distribution of lung fibrosis and quantitative evaluation of disease severity (7). The fibrotic lesions in current animal models of lung fibrosis are characterized by spatial heterogeneity. Because three-dimensional reconstruction of micro-CT scans provides information of the entire thoracic cavity, micro-CT–based measurements are less likely to be influenced by the nonuniform distribution of lung fibrosis. Several micro-CT analysis protocols have been developed and validated for quantification of aerated lung volume (an inverse surrogate marker for pulmonary fibrosis) in mice and rats (3, 5, 7). A major challenge for quantification of aerated lung volume by micro-CT scans is correct segmentation of airspaces from intrapulmonary fibrotic tissues and from the surrounding extrapulmonary tissues. Rodt and colleagues (5) applied a modified region-growing segmentation algorithm on each individual micro-CT scan using MevisLab software (MeVis Research, Bremen, Germany). They found a significant correlation between micro-CT–derived aerated lung volumes and the histopathology scores in adenoviral TGF-β–induced mouse lung fibrosis. However, the semiautomated quantification algorithm used in this study involves manual setting of the seeding points for the region growing algorithm. This may potentially result in an observer-induced assessment bias. To eliminate observer interference, De Langhe and colleagues (3) recently developed a fully automated micro-CT image analysis algorithm that used CTAn software (SkyScan, Kontich, Belgium) for segmentation of aerated lung volumes and CTVol software (SkyScan) for three-dimensional image construction. The validity of this technique in longitudinal in vivo quantitative assessment of pulmonary fibrosis was demonstrated in BLM-induced mouse lung fibrosis. Micro-CT imaging provides complementary data to more conventional measurements of lung fibrosis and, importantly, provides information on the distinct spatial distribution of fibrosis.

Motion Artifacts

During acquisition of CT scans, animals are subject to respiratory motion while under anesthesia. The dynamic respiratory movements can blur micro-CT images, particularly near the diaphragm. Various techniques have been developed to reduce the degree of motion artifacts to produce high-resolution micro-CT images. Prospective respiratory gating limits respiratory motion by synchronizing the scan to the breathing cycle through an external ventilator (8), and retrospective gating improves motion artifacts by postacquisition sorting of images and subjecting each image group to a single respiratory phase (9). Motion artifacts can also be reduced by shortening the scanning time. Flat-panel volumetric CT scans murine lungs at a resolution of 50 μm within 8 seconds, whereas most micro-CT instruments require minutes to scan to achieve the same resolution (10). The rapid acquisition of imaging data by flat-panel volumetric CT dramatically reduces the susceptibility to motion artifacts. Although higher-energy photons (e.g., 80 keV) may speed up imaging data acquisition, the use of higher X-ray photon energies also reduces soft tissue contrast.

Radiation Toxicity

An inherent concern with the use of micro-CT is the exposure to X-radiation. X-radiation may potentially alter the phenotype and/or genotype of animals. This is a particular concern for longitudinal micro-CT scan studies requiring multiple scans. Several previous studies have examined unscanned and serially scanned mice for potential radiotoxic effects. One study showed that normal C57BL/6 mice scanned (80 kVp/50 mA) three times weekly for 6 weeks (resulting in a weekly dose of 0.84 Gy and a total study dose of 5.04 Gy) had no significant pathologic cardiopulmonary consequences compared with unirradiated mice; this was based on evaluations of the volume and density of the lung, the volume and ejection fraction of the left ventricle, and histological examinations of lung and myocardial tissues for inflammation and fibrosis (11). In a separate study, mice receiving a higher dose of X-radiation (7–9 Gy) did not develop significant lung fibrosis (12). It has been reported that phase shift X-ray and refraction X-ray CT scanners reduce the potential toxicity of radiation exposures (13).

MRI

MRI uses strong magnetic field and radio waves to form detailed images of organs and tissues in the body. It enables detection of anatomical and functional changes in the lung and has the potential to discriminate between inflammatory and fibrotic processes in vivo. MRI is free of ionizing radiation and therefore is less likely to influence the injury-repair process. MRI provides a useful tool for assessing the efficacy of antifibrotic drugs in preclinical studies.

Proton MRI

Although the conventional proton MRI has been used to detect BLM-induced lung injury in rats (14), the inherent air–tissue interface generates large magnetic susceptibility gradients, which cause significant loss of signals in standard MR pulse sequences (15). Ultrashort echo time (UTE)-MRI overcomes this limitation and is capable of detecting small foci of inflammatory and/or fibrotic lesions, which remain undetectable in conventional MRI (16). In addition, the acquisition time in UTE-MRI is considerably reduced compared with conventional proton MRI (16). Thus, UTE-MRI allows for high-throughput measurements of a large number of animals per day.

Respiratory-Gated and Self-Gated MRI

Similar to micro-CT imaging, MRI suffers from breathing-related motion artifacts. Respiratory-gated MRI with synchronous ventilation minimizes respiratory motion artifacts by controlling breathing to the recovery period after data acquisition (17). However, mechanical ventilation in respiratory-gated MRI, particularly if applied repeatedly, may contribute to (or exacerbate) lung injury. AcidoCEST MRI is a technique that was originally developed for measurements of extracellular pH in stationary kidney, bladder, and solid tumors. Recently, respiratory-gated acidoCEST MRI has been developed to repetitively measure extracellular pH in BLM-injured mice (18).

Self-gated MRI corrects motion artifacts based on MRI signal intensity variations (19). Despite being less sensitive to the earlier stages of lung inflammation, this technique has been proven to provide more accurate information in visualizing and quantifying the progression of lung fibrosis in BLM-treated mice (20). It has been reported that MRI with a gradient-echo sequence produces sharper lung images even in spontaneously breathing rats (21). This technique uses image averaging to suppress motion artifacts due to respiratory movements.

Hyperpolarized Gas–Enhanced MRI

In contrast to the conventional MRI, which detects changes in lung structure with little or no capability to evaluate lung function, MRI with hyperpolarized gases provides both structural and functional information of the lung. Hyperpolarized 129Xe MRI detects inhaled gaseous 129Xe in the airspace, lung interstitium, and red blood cells. MRI of 129Xe in these three different compartments provides a means to measure alveolar–capillary gas transfer. It has been shown that BLM treatment reduces 129Xe signal intensity in all three of these compartments in rat lungs (22). Impaired 129Xe transfer to red blood cells was observed in regions of severe lung injury. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional ventilation are commonly used metrics to evaluate lung function and structure. Hyperpolarized 3He MRI analysis has shown that BLM- or radiation-exposed rats had significantly decreased fractional ventilation and ADC of 3He compared with control animals (23, 24). Furthermore, areas of decreased ADC in radiation-treated rats correlated with lung fibrosis identified by histological analysis (24). Because 3He gas has a larger gyromagnetic ratio and a higher polarization level than 129Xe gas, 3He MRI is more sensitive (by approximately one order of magnitude) than 129Xe MRI.

Distinguishing Lung Fibrosis from Inflammation by MRI

MRI has the potential to differentiate lung inflammation and fibrosis by means of signal intensity and contrast enhancement. Polylysine–gadopentetate dimeglumine and gadolinium–diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid, macromolecular MRI contrast agents, have been used to distinguish alveolitis and pulmonary fibrosis in cadmium chloride–treated rats and in BLM-treated rabbits (25, 26). It has been reported that lung fibrosis in BLM-treated mice is manifested by an increased T2, whereas lung inflammation is associated with decreased T2, suggesting that spin-spin relaxation time may differentiate inflammation and fibrosis in the lung (27). However, an apparently opposite result has been observed in BLM-treated rats (28). To date, most of the studies suggest that signal intensity (S0) measurements help differentiate lung inflammation and fibrosis (25, 26, 29, 30). A more recent study failed to confirm altered S0 and T2 relaxation in distinguishing pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis in BLM-treated rats (31). Although differentiation of inflammation and fibrosis is a particular interest in pulmonary research, MRI characteristics that reliably distinguish inflammation from fibrosis appear to be lacking.

Nuclear Imaging and Multimodality Imaging

Nuclear imaging uses radioisotope-labeled, small-molecule compounds, known as tracers, to detect in vivo biological processes at the molecular level. PET and SPECT systems are common instruments that record gamma rays emitted by radiotracers. Most current nuclear imaging devices integrate PET and SPECT with high-resolution CT. These bimodal systems coregister molecular imaging data with fine structural data obtained by CT, enabling the precise anatomical localization of nuclear imaging signals.

PET and PET/CT Imaging of Glucose Metabolism

[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (18F-FDG), a 18F-labeled glucose analog, is the most widely used PET tracer. It competes with glucose for uptake into metabolically active cells through glucose transporter-1. In the cytoplasm, 18F-FDG is phosphorylated by hexokinase to deoxyglucose-6-phosphate. Radiolabeled deoxyglucose-6-phosphate does not undergo further metabolism and accumulates in cells. Metabolically (specifically, glycolysis) active cells have a higher rate of 18F-FDG uptake and therefore have a higher accumulation of 18F-FDG, which distinguishes them from quiescent normal cells on PET scans.

18F-FDG PET is a sensitive imaging modality for the detection of cellular glucose uptake in rabbit models of lung inflammation and fibrosis as well as in human IPF (32, 33). PET scans have shown that lung uptake of 18F-FDG after intravenous injection was increased in microcrystalline silica- or BLM-treated rabbits compared with control rabbits, and the 18F-FDG signals persisted for several weeks in the lung (34). Microautoradiographic analysis suggested that neutrophils were the primary cell type responsible for increased 18F-FDG uptake in microcrystalline silica–challenged rabbits (34). (Myo)fibroblasts may contribute to prolonged 18F-FDG uptake during the fibrotic phase in rabbit lungs; previous studies demonstrated that activated fibroblasts had increased glucose uptake and glycolysis (35). It has been found that pulmonary 18F-FDG uptake in humans was related to disease severity of IPF, as assessed by quality of life measurements, lung volumes, and gas transfer (36). In approximately three fourths of patients with IPF, the most intense pulmonary 18F-FDG uptake was localized to honeycomb cystic regions (34). Furthermore, pulmonary 18F-FDG uptake significantly correlated with lung function and global health score of patients with IPF (34). Despite these recent advances, current 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT techniques are unable to distinguish IPF and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (36).

PET and PET/CT Imaging of Proline Uptake

Pulmonary fibrosis is characterized by excessive production of extracellular matrix proteins, primarily collagens. Because collagens are rich in proline residues, specific PET scans have been developed to track the uptake of isotope-labeled proline analogs for the evaluation of lung fibrosis (37). In microcrystalline silica–induced rabbit model of silicosis, PET imaging detected heightened pulmonary uptake of Cis-4-18F-fluoro-l-proline (18F-proline) in microcrystalline silica–challenged regions. The 18F-proline signals were found to correlate with histopathologic scores of lung fibrosis in rabbits (38). A separate study with PET imaging confirmed increased 18F-proline signals in the lungs of microcrystalline silica–treated rabbits (34). It appears that radiolabeled proline localized to fibroblasts in the silica-challenged regions, whereas fibroblasts at the nonfibrotic regions and the acellular fibrotic extracellular matrix were largely unlabeled (34). These results suggest that uptake of 18F-proline by lung fibroblasts rather than incorporation of 18F-proline into newly synthesized collagen contributes to increased PET signals in fibrotic rabbit lungs. 11C-proline has also been used as a radiotracer in PET imaging of pulmonary fibrosis (34). The shorter half-life of 11C (20 min) restricts PET imaging in a limited time, rendering 11C-proline PET less practical than 18F PET.

PET/CT and SPECT/CT Imaging of Receptors on the Cell Surface

Fibroblasts isolated from BLM-treated mice and patients with IPF express increased levels of somatostatin receptor (SSTR) (39). SSTR blockers reduce collagen deposition, improve pathologic scores, and increase the survival rate in BLM-treated mice (39). A 68Ga-labeled peptide tracer (68Ga-DOTANOC) that specifically binds SSTR with high affinity has been developed to track SSTR expression in patients with IPF (40). PET/CT studies found that the uptake of 68Ga-DOTANOC was primarily located at the peripheral and subpleural regions, typically affected in IPF lungs. More intense 68Ga-DOTANOC signals were observed at the regions between honeycomb cysts and ground-glass opacity, where fibroblastic foci are most represented. Patients with NSIP had no significant pulmonary uptake of 68Ga-DOTANOC (41). A previous study has shown that normal human subjects did not exhibit uptake of 68Ga-DOTANOC in the lungs (42). The PET/CT imaging studies confirm increased SSTR expression in IPF; further studies are required to determine if 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging is a valid approach for testing the antifibrotic efficacy of candidate drugs.

Overexpression of αvβ6 integrin by alveolar epithelial cells plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis. Measurements of αvβ6 levels in lung tissues have been restricted to ex vivo immunohistochemical analysis. In a recent study, 111In-labeled peptides specific to αvβ6 (A20FMDV2) were developed and used to measure αvβ6 expression in BLM-treated mouse lungs by SPECT/CT (43). The authors found that lung 111In-A20FMDV2 signals were increased in BLM-treated mice compared with saline-treated control mice. The highest level of radioactive signals was detected 1 hour after intravenous administration of 111In-A20FMDV2. Pretreatment of the mice with αvβ6-blocking antibodies attenuated the binding of 111In-A20FMDV2 in mouse lungs. In contrast, 111In-labeled control peptides (111In-A20FMDVran) did not show significant binding to mouse lungs. Quantitative analysis demonstrated that SPECT signals correlate with the levels of hydroxyproline, αvβ6 protein, and messenger RNA of the β6 subunit. Together, this study suggests that SPECT/CT provides a useful means for noninvasive measures of endogenous αvβ6 and may potentially be used for stratifying therapies for patients with IPF.

Macrophages express a high level of benzodiazepine-like receptors. 11C-R-PK11195 tracers have been developed to track macrophage accumulation in the lung. PET scan studies have shown that an increase in lung 11C-R-PK11195 signals is associated with decreased macrophage clearance in microcrystalline silica–treated rabbits (34). This finding supports the hypothesis that a deficient macrophage clearance is associated with pulmonary fibrosis.

Conclusions

Noninvasive imaging offers exciting new opportunities for preclinical research in lung fibrosis. Each of these imaging modalities has advantages and disadvantages (Table 1). Micro-CT enables dynamic assessment of the progression and topographic distribution of lung fibrosis in small animal models. MRI provides valuable information in the context of profiling antifibrotic compounds. Of particular interest is the potential of hyperpolarized gaseous MRI for the evaluation of compounds designed to improve lung function. Lung fibrosis in most animal models results from inflammation, whereas IPF is primarily a fibrotic disease with relatively less inflammation in its late stages. The effectiveness of preclinical testing of antifibrotic compounds in animal models requires distinguishing the effects of compounds on the inflammatory process versus fibrosis progression. MRI has shown the potential to fulfill this requirement. Finally, nuclear imaging provides a versatile tool to study specific molecular events in lung fibrosis, validate biomarkers for the diagnosis of lung fibrosis, and test the efficacy of potential antifibrotic drugs in live animals. It is clear that noninvasive imaging techniques will play an increasingly important role in preclinical lung fibrosis research.

Table 1.

Comparison of Current Imaging Modalities

  Modality
Feature Micro-CT MRI Nuclear Medicine Imaging (PET/SPECT) Bimodality Imaging (PET/CT, SPECT/CT)
Spatial resolution Excellent (up to 1 μm) Good (up to 25–100 μm) Poor (∼1 mm) Excellent
3D lung assessment Yes Yes Yes Yes
Assessment of lung structure, function, and/or molecular mechanisms Structure Structure and function Molecular mechanisms Molecular mechanisms and structure
Potential for distinguishing lung inflammation versus fibrosis No Yes Yes (with specific molecular tracers) Yes (with specific molecular tracers)
Acquisition time Fast (minutes) Slow (minutes to hours) Fast (minutes) Fast
Ionizing radiation Yes No Yes Yes
Cost Less expensive ($200,000–$400,000) Most expensive (∼$2,000,000) Expensive (<$1,000,000) Expensive

Definition of abbreviations: CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PET, positron emission tomography; SPECT, single photon emission computed tomography.

Footnotes

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants R01 HL124076 (Y.Z.), R01 AG046210 (V.J.T.), and P01 HL114470 (V.J.T.); by an American Thoracic Society Foundation Recognition Award (Y.Z.); and by American Heart Association Grant-in-Aid 14GRNT20180023 (Y.Z.).

Originally Published in Press as DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2015-0032TR on February 13, 2015

Author disclosures are available with the text of this article at www.atsjournals.org.

References

  • 1.Gammon ST, Foje N, Brewer EM, Owers E, Downs CA, Budde MD, Leevy WM, Helms MN. Preclinical anatomical, molecular, and functional imaging of the lung with multiple modalities. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2014;306:L897–L914. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00007.2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cavanaugh D, Travis EL, Price RE, Gladish G, White RA, Wang M, Cody DD. Quantification of bleomycin-induced murine lung damage in vivo with micro-computed tomography. Acad Radiol. 2006;13:1505–1512. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2006.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.De Langhe E, Vande Velde G, Hostens J, Himmelreich U, Nemery B, Luyten FP, Vanoirbeek J, Lories RJ. Quantification of lung fibrosis and emphysema in mice using automated micro-computed tomography. PLoS One. 2012;7:e43123. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Scotton CJ, Hayes B, Alexander R, Datta A, Forty EJ, Mercer PF, Blanchard A, Chambers RC. Ex vivo micro-computed tomography analysis of bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis for preclinical drug evaluation. Eur Respir J. 2013;42:1633–1645. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00182412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rodt T, von Falck C, Dettmer S, Halter R, Maus R, Ask K, Kolb M, Gauldie J, Länger F, Hoy L, et al. Micro-computed tomography of pulmonary fibrosis in mice induced by adenoviral gene transfer of biologically active transforming growth factor-β1. Respir Res. 2010;11:181. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-11-181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shofer S, Badea C, Auerbach S, Schwartz DA, Johnson GA. A micro-computed tomography-based method for the measurement of pulmonary compliance in healthy and bleomycin-exposed mice. Exp Lung Res. 2007;33:169–183. doi: 10.1080/01902140701364458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ask K, Labiris R, Farkas L, Moeller A, Froese A, Farncombe T, McClelland GB, Inman M, Gauldie J, Kolb MR. Comparison between conventional and “clinical” assessment of experimental lung fibrosis. J Transl Med. 2008;6:16. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-6-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cavanaugh D, Johnson E, Price RE, Kurie J, Travis EL, Cody DD. In vivo respiratory-gated micro-CT imaging in small-animal oncology models. Mol Imaging. 2004;3:55–62. doi: 10.1162/15353500200403184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Johnston SM, Perez BA, Kirsch DG, Badea CT. Phase-selective image reconstruction of the lungs in small animals using micro-ct. Proc Soc Photo Opt Instrum Eng. 2010;7622:76223G.76221–76223G.76229. doi: 10.1117/12.844359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Greschus S, Kiessling F, Lichy MP, Moll J, Mueller MM, Savai R, Rose F, Ruppert C, Günther A, Luecke M, et al. Potential applications of flat-panel volumetric CT in morphologic and functional small animal imaging. Neoplasia. 2005;7:730–740. doi: 10.1593/neo.05160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Detombe SA, Dunmore-Buyze J, Petrov IE, Drangova M. X-ray dose delivered during a longitudinal micro-CT study has no adverse effect on cardiac and pulmonary tissue in C57BL/6 mice. Acta Radiol. 2013;54:435–441. doi: 10.1177/0284185113475608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Day RM, Barshishat-Kupper M, Mog SR, McCart EA, Prasanna PG, Davis TA, Landauer MR. Genistein protects against biomarkers of delayed lung sequelae in mice surviving high-dose total body irradiation. J Radiat Res (Tokyo) 2008;49:361–372. doi: 10.1269/jrr.07121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Beckmann F, Bonse U, Busch F, Günnewig O. X-ray microtomography (microCT) using phase contrast for the investigation of organic matter. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1997;21:539–553. doi: 10.1097/00004728-199707000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Karmouty-Quintana H, Cannet C, Zurbruegg S, Blé FX, Fozard JR, Page CP, Beckmann N. Bleomycin-induced lung injury assessed noninvasively and in spontaneously breathing rats by proton MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;26:941–949. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ohno Y, Koyama H, Yoshikawa T, Nishio M, Matsumoto S, Iwasawa T, Sugimura K. Pulmonary magnetic resonance imaging for airway diseases. J Thorac Imaging. 2011;26:301–316. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0b013e3182242925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Egger C, Cannet C, Gérard C, Jarman E, Jarai G, Feige A, Suply T, Micard A, Dunbar A, Tigani B, et al. Administration of bleomycin via the oropharyngeal aspiration route leads to sustained lung fibrosis in mice and rats as quantified by UTE-MRI and histology. PLoS One. 2013;8:e63432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hedlund LW, Cofer GP, Owen SJ, Allan Johnson G. MR-compatible ventilator for small animals: computer-controlled ventilation for proton and noble gas imaging. Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;18:753–759. doi: 10.1016/s0730-725x(00)00154-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jones KM, Randtke EA, Howison CM, Cárdenas-Rodríguez J, Sime PJ, Kottmann MR, Pagel MD. Measuring extracellular ph in a lung fibrosis model with acidoCEST MRI. Mol Imaging Biol. doi: 10.1007/s11307-014-0784-6. (In press) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.van Heeswijk RB, Bonanno G, Coppo S, Coristine A, Kober T, Stuber M. Motion compensation strategies in magnetic resonance imaging. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2012;40:99–119. doi: 10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v40.i2.20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Vande Velde G, De Langhe E, Poelmans J, Dresselaers T, Lories RJ, Himmelreich U. Magnetic resonance imaging for noninvasive assessment of lung fibrosis onset and progression: cross-validation and comparison of different magnetic resonance imaging protocols with micro-computed tomography and histology in the bleomycin-induced mouse model. Invest Radiol. 2014;49:691–698. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Beckmann N, Tigani B, Mazzoni L, Fozard JR. MRI of lung parenchyma in rats and mice using a gradient-echo sequence. NMR Biomed. 2001;14:297–306. doi: 10.1002/nbm.706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Driehuys B, Cofer GP, Pollaro J, Mackel JB, Hedlund LW, Johnson GA. Imaging alveolar-capillary gas transfer using hyperpolarized 129Xe MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:18278–18283. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608458103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Stephen MJ, Emami K, Woodburn JM, Chia E, Kadlecek S, Zhu J, Pickup S, Ishii M, Rizi RR, Rossman M. Quantitative assessment of lung ventilation and microstructure in an animal model of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis using hyperpolarized gas MRI. Acad Radiol. 2010;17:1433–1443. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.06.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ward ER, Hedlund LW, Kurylo WC, Wheeler CT, Cofer GP, Dewhirst MW, Marks LB, Vujaskovic Z. Proton and hyperpolarized helium magnetic resonance imaging of radiation-induced lung injury in rats. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;58:1562–1569. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Berthezène Y, Vexler V, Kuwatsuru R, Rosenau W, Mühler A, Clément O, Price DC, Brasch RC. Differentiation of alveolitis and pulmonary fibrosis with a macromolecular MR imaging contrast agent. Radiology. 1992;185:97–103. doi: 10.1148/radiology.185.1.1523341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kersjes W, Hildebrandt G, Cagil H, Schunk K, von Zitzewitz H, Schild H. Differentiation of alveolitis and pulmonary fibrosis in rabbits with magnetic resonance imaging after intrabronchial administration of bleomycin. Invest Radiol. 1999;34:13–21. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199901000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Taylor CR, Sostman HD, Gore JC, Smith GW. Proton relaxation times in bleomycin-induced lung injury. Invest Radiol. 1987;22:621–626. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198708000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Cutillo AG, Chan PH, Ailion DC, Watanabe S, Rao NV, Hansen CB, Albertine KH, Laicher G, Durney CH. Characterization of bleomycin lung injury by nuclear magnetic resonance: correlation between NMR relaxation times and lung water and collagen content. Magn Reson Med. 2002;47:246–256. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yi CA, Lee KS, Han J, Chung MP, Chung MJ, Shin KM. 3-T MRI for differentiating inflammation- and fibrosis-predominant lesions of usual and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia: comparison study with pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:878–885. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Babin AL, Cannet C, Gérard C, Wyss D, Page CP, Beckmann N. Noninvasive assessment of bleomycin-induced lung injury and the effects of short-term glucocorticosteroid treatment in rats using MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011;33:603–614. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Jacob RE, Amidan BG, Soelberg J, Minard KR. In vivo MRI of altered proton signal intensity and T2 relaxation in a bleomycin model of pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;31:1091–1099. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jones HA, Schofield JB, Krausz T, Boobis AR, Haslett C. Pulmonary fibrosis correlates with duration of tissue neutrophil activation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158:620–628. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.158.2.9711075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Win T, Lambrou T, Hutton BF, Kayani I, Screaton NJ, Porter JC, Maher TM, Endozo R, Shortman RI, Lukey P, et al. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography pulmonary imaging in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is reproducible: implications for future clinical trials. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:521–528. doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-1986-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Jones HA, Hamacher K, Clark JC, Schofield JB, Krausz T, Haslett C, Boobis AR. Positron emission tomography in the quantification of cellular and biochemical responses to intrapulmonary particulates. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2005;207(Suppl):230–236. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2005.02.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Fireman E, Shahar I, Shoval S, Messer G, Dvash S, Grief J. Morphological and biochemical properties of alveolar fibroblasts in interstitial lung diseases. Lung. 2001;179:105–117. doi: 10.1007/s004080000051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Groves AM, Win T, Screaton NJ, Berovic M, Endozo R, Booth H, Kayani I, Menezes LJ, Dickson JC, Ell PJ. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and diffuse parenchymal lung disease: implications from initial experience with 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:538–545. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wester HJ, Herz M, Senekowitsch-Schmidtke R, Schwaiger M, Stöcklin G, Hamacher K. Preclinical evaluation of 4-[18F]fluoroprolines: diastereomeric effect on metabolism and uptake in mice. Nucl Med Biol. 1999;26:259–265. doi: 10.1016/s0969-8051(98)00107-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wallace WE, Gupta NC, Hubbs AF, Mazza SM, Bishop HA, Keane MJ, Battelli LA, Ma J, Schleiff P. Cis-4-[18F]fluoro-l-proline PET imaging of pulmonary fibrosis in a rabbit model. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:413–420. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Borie R, Fabre A, Prost F, Marchal-Somme J, Lebtahi R, Marchand-Adam S, Aubier M, Soler P, Crestani B. Activation of somatostatin receptors attenuates pulmonary fibrosis. Thorax. 2008;63:251–258. doi: 10.1136/thx.2007.078006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Antunes P, Ginj M, Zhang H, Waser B, Baum RP, Reubi JC, Maecke H. Are radiogallium-labelled DOTA-conjugated somatostatin analogues superior to those labelled with other radiometals? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:982–993. doi: 10.1007/s00259-006-0317-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ambrosini V, Zompatori M, De Luca F, Antonia D, Allegri V, Nanni C, Malvi D, Tonveronachi E, Fasano L, Fabbri M, et al. 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT allows somatostatin receptor imaging in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: preliminary results. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:1950–1955. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.079962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Pettinato C, Sarnelli A, Di Donna M, Civollani S, Nanni C, Montini G, Di Pierro D, Ferrari M, Marengo M, Bergamini C. 68Ga-DOTANOC: biodistribution and dosimetry in patients affected by neuroendocrine tumors. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:72–79. doi: 10.1007/s00259-007-0587-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.John AE, Luckett JC, Tatler AL, Awais RO, Desai A, Habgood A, Ludbrook S, Blanchard AD, Perkins AC, Jenkins RG, et al. Preclinical SPECT/CT imaging of αvβ6 integrins for molecular stratification of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:2146–2152. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.120592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology are provided here courtesy of American Thoracic Society

RESOURCES