Abstract
Micro-RNAs (miRNA) are important regulators of gene expression and often differentially expressed in cancer and other diseases. We have previously shown that miR-193b is hypermethylated in prostate cancer (PC) and suppresses cell growth. It has been suggested that miR-193b targets cyclin D1 in several malignancies. Here, our aim was to determine if miR-193b targets cyclin D1 in prostate cancer. Our data show that miR-193b is commonly methylated in PC samples compared to benign prostate hyperplasia. We found reduced miR-193b expression (P < 0.05) in stage pT3 tumors compared to pT2 tumors in a cohort of prostatectomy specimens. In 22Rv1 PC cells with low endogenous miR-193b expression, the overexpression of miR-193b reduced CCND1mRNA levels and cyclin D1 protein levels. In addition, the exogenous expression of miR-193b decreased the phosphorylation level of RB, a target of the cyclin D1-CDK4/6 pathway. Moreover, according to a reporter assay, miR-193b targeted the 3’UTR of CCND1 in PC cells and the CCND1 activity was rescued by expressing CCND1 lacking its 3’UTR. Immunohistochemical analysis of cyclin D1 showed that castration-resistant prostate cancers have significantly (P = 0.0237) higher expression of cyclin D1 compared to hormone-naïve cases. Furthermore, the PC cell lines 22Rv1 and VCaP, which express low levels of miR-193b and high levels of CCND1, showed significant growth retardation when treated with a CDK4/6 inhibitor. In contrast, the inhibitor had no effect on the growth of PC-3 and DU145 cells with high miR-193b and low CCND1 expression. Taken together, our data demonstrate that miR-193b targets cyclin D1 in prostate cancer.
Keywords: Cyclin D1, micro-RNA, prostate cancer
Introduction
Prostate cancer (PC) is the second most frequently diagnosed cancer type and the sixth leading cause of cancer-related deaths in males worldwide 1. Localized PC can be cured with prostatectomy and/or radiation therapy. However, there is no curative treatment for advanced and castration-resistant disease 2. The use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for the screening of asymptomatic men for prostate cancer is known to reduce the disease-specific mortality, but screening is associated with overdiagnosis 3. Therefore, there is a strong interest to find additional markers and therapeutic targets for the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) could serve as such markers or as drug targets 4.
miRNAs are small, ∼22 nucleotide long noncoding RNA molecules that were first discovered in Caenorhabditis elegans 5. Since their discovery, miRNAs have been found to be important regulators of gene expression in other organisms as well 5,6. miRNAs modulate gene expression by binding to a complementary sequence in the 3’ untranslated region (3’UTR) of target messenger RNAs (mRNAs). The binding of a miRNA leads to the degradation of the mRNA molecule or alternatively, to the suppression of mRNA translation, depending on the level of complementary binding 7. Because one miRNA can have multiple targets and one mRNA molecule can be targeted by many miRNAs, miRNAs form a complex level of regulation of gene expression. In addition to genetic changes (chromosomal rearrangements, deletions, amplifications, and mutations), epigenetic events such as aberrant promoter hypermethylation, global hypomethylation, and posttranscriptional histone modification may also cause the dysregulation of miRNAs in cancer 7. Several miRNAs are deregulated in prostate cancer and have been shown to affect apoptosis, cell cycle, intracellular signaling, DNA repair, adhesion/migration, and androgen signaling (reviewed in 4).
We previously showed that hsa-miR-193b-3p (aka miR-193b) may function as an epigenetically regulated tumor suppressor in prostate cancer 8. Using bisulfite sequencing we showed that miR-193b is hypermethylated in some PC cell lines, with the 22Rv1 cell line being the most heavily methylated resulting in the loss of miR-193b expression in the cells. Transient transfection of pre-miR-193b into 22Rv1 cells caused significant growth reduction due to a decreased fraction of cells in S-phase of the cell cycle.
There are several suggested target genes for miR-193b in different cancers, for example, CCND1, ETS1, and KIT 9–16. The cyclin D1-encoding gene, CCND1, is targeted by miR-193b in hepatocellular carcinoma 10, melanoma 11, and pancreatic cancer 14. Cyclin D1 is frequently aberrantly expressed in cancer. It regulates the expression of genes that are involved in DNA replication and the DNA damage checkpoint. The best known function of cyclin D1 is most likely its catalytic function as a regulatory partner for the cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) 4 and 6. In response to cellular stimuli, cyclin D1 activates CDKs 4 and 6, which in turn phosphorylate various proteins, the principal substrate being retinoblastoma (RB) protein. When phosphorylated, RB releases the E2F transcription factor, which activates genes that are necessary for DNA synthesis and cell cycle progression from the G1 to S phase. In addition to its catalytic function, cyclin D1 also has noncatalytic functions, with the major function being transcriptional regulation 17. In prostate cancer, cyclin D1 has been shown to function as a corepressor to androgen receptor (AR) 18–20.
Because cyclin D1 is a suggested target of miR-193b in other cancers, we aimed to study whether it is also a target in prostate cancer. In addition, our goal was to confirm the hypermethylation of miR-193b in clinical prostate cancer samples.
Materials and Methods
Cell lines, xenografts, and clinical samples
The prostate cancer cell lines 22Rv1, PC-3, LNCaP, and DU145 were obtained from the American Type Cell Collection (Manassas, VA). LAPC-4 and VCaP cell lines were provided by Dr. Charles Sawyers (University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA) and Dr. Jack Schalken (Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands), respectively. All cell lines were cultured under recommended conditions. The 17 PC LuCaP xenografts were provided by one of the authors (R.L.V.).
All clinical samples were obtained from Tampere University Hospital (TAUH, Tampere, Finland). Fresh-frozen tissue samples, including 10 benign prostate hyperplasias (BPH), 26 untreated prostatectomy specimens, and nine castration-resistant tumors (CRPC), were used to study miR-193b methylation, whereas 78 hormonally untreated PC prostatectomy specimens (Table S1) were used to study miR-193b expression. BPH samples were obtained from transurethral resection (TURP) or (cysto)prostatectomies from patients with BPH or bladder cancer. Untreated cancer samples were obtained from prostatectomies and CRPC samples from TURP. The samples used in this study were histologically examined to contain >70% cancerous or hyperplastic tissue. For cyclin D1 immunohistochemical analysis, a total of 267 formalin-fixed prostate cancer specimens (198 from prostatectomies and 69 CRPC samples) were used to construct tissue microarrays (TMAs; Table S2). Ethics Committee of Tampere University Hospital and National Authority for Medicolegal Affairs have approved the use of clinical tumor material.
DNA and RNA extraction from clinical samples
For the methylation analysis, freshly frozen tissue blocks were cut into 10 × 20-micrometer sections using a cryotome. DNA was isolated using an AllPrep RNA/DNA minikit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. For miR-193b expression analysis and arrays, RNA was isolated using Trizol® reagent (Invitrogen, Life Technologies Corporation, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer's protocol.
Microarrays
miRNA and mRNA expression data from cell lines was produced using Agilent Tehcnologies’ (Santa Clara, CA) miRNA microarray system (version 1 array containing 470 human and 64 viral miRNAs) 8 and Whole Human Genome Kit (4 × 44k) (Agilent Tehcnologies, Santa Clara, CA), respectively. For LuCaP xenografts Affymetrix (Santa Clara, CA) HG U133 Plus 2.0 microarray was used. The arrays were done according to the manufacturer's protocols.
Cell transfection and cotransfection
To determine the effect of miR-193b expression on cyclin D1, RB, and pRB levels, 22Rv1 cells were transfected with a final concentration of 5 nmol/L pre-miR-193b or scrambled control using INTERFERin transfection reagent (Polyplus-transfection, Illkirch, France) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The cells were collected 3 days after transfection. miRNA precursors were purchased from Ambion (Applied Biosystems/Ambion, Austin, TX).
For the Cyclin D1 rescue and cell cycle experiment, 22Rv1 cells were cotransfected with 10 μg of plasmid, pCMV-CCND1 lacking a 3’UTR (Plasmid 19927; Addgene, Cambridge, MA), or the control plasmid pCMV6-AC-GFP (OriGene Technologies, Rockville, MD) along with either pre-miR-193b or pre-miR-scramble at a final concentration of 10 nmol/L, using jetPRIME transfection reagent (Polyplus-transfection). The cells were collected 2 days after transfection.
Flow cytometric analysis
Cells were harvested by trypsinization, washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and fixed in cold 70% EtOH. Ethanol was aspirated, and the cells were washed and rehydrated with PBS. Staining was performed with propidium iodide (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), and cell cycle profiles were analyzed with Accuri C6 Flow cytometer.
Luciferase reporter assay
For the luciferase reporter assay, the pSGG-3UTR plasmid was purchased from SwitchGear Genomics (Menlo Park, CA). The plasmid contains a luciferase gene fused with the 3’UTR of CCND1. 22Rv1 cells were cotransfected with the 3’UTR plasmid, a control plasmid-containing Renilla luciferase and pre-miR-193b or pre-miR-scramble using Lipofectamine™ 2000 transfection reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Firefly and Renilla luciferase activities were measured 24 h after transfection using the Dual-Glo Luciferase Assay System (Promega, Madison, WI). Renilla luciferase values were used for data normalization. The luciferase assay was performed in quadruplicate, and repeated four times.
Western Blot
Nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins for RB and pRB western blots and total protein for cyclin D1 western blots were isolated as described previously 21,22. A total of 20 μg of proteins were separated on 8% (RB, pRB) and 10% (Cyclin D1) SDS-PAGE gels and blotted to a PVDF membrane (Immobilon-P, Millipore Corp., Billerica, MA). The membranes were incubated with primary antibodies against phospho-Rb (Ser795, 1:1000, Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA), Rb (C-15: sc-50, 1:500; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX) or cyclin D1 (clone SP4, 1:100; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) and with antibodies against fibrillarin (C13C3, 1:4000; Cell Signaling) or actin (pan AB-5 clone ACTN05, 1:400; Lab Vision Corp., Fremont, CA). After secondary antibody incubation (anti-rabbit-HRP for phospho-RB, RB, cyclin D1 and fibrillarin, and anti-mouse-HRP for Actin; 1:3000, Dako), the proteins were visualized by autoradiography.
Immunohistochemistry
Antibodies against cyclin D1 (dilution 1:100, clone SP4; Dako) and Ki-67 (dilution 1:500, MM1; Leica Biosystems Newcastle Ltd., Newcastle upon Tyne, UK) were used with a Power Vision+ Poly-HRP IHC kit (ImmunoVision Technologies Co., Hillsborough, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions and as described by Leinonen et al. 23. The slides were scanned with an Aperio ScanScope XT scanner (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). The virtual microscope 24,25 and the ImmunoRatio web application 26 were used to score the cyclin D1-staining intensity (0–1 = negative and weak, 2 = moderate, and 3 = strong) in a blinded fashion.
Quantitative real-time RT-PCR
For miR-193b q-RT-PCR, a TaqMan microRNA Assay (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and the CFX96 q-RT-PCR detection system (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA) were used according to the manufacturers’ recommendations. miRNA expression was normalized to RNU6B expression. For CCND1 q-RT-PCR, first-strand complementary DNA synthesis was performed from total RNA using AMV reverse transcriptase (Finnzymes Inc., Espoo, Finland) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The expression of CCND1 was measured with Maxima SYBR Green (Fermentas Inc., Burlington, ON, Canada) and the CFX96 q-RT-PCR detection system (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc.) and was normalized to the β-Actin reference gene. The primer sequences used for the CCND1 and β-Actin q-RT-PCR were: CyclinD1for 5’-CCCTCGGTG GGTCCTACTTCAA-3’, CyclinD1rev 5’-TGGCATTTTGG AGAGGAAGT-3’, and Bactinf4 5’-TGGGACGACATGGAG AAAAT-3’, Bactinr4 5’-AGAGGCGTACAGGGATAGCA-3’.
miR-193b methylation analysis
Methylated DNA was enriched using MethylMiner™ Methylated DNA Enrichment Kit (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, 2 μg of genomic DNA was fragmented by sonication. Methylated DNA was enriched by binding to magnetic beads coated with the methyl-CpG-binding domain of the human MBD2 protein (Methyl-CpG Binding Domain Protein 2) and eluted as a single fraction using 2 M NaCl. Finally, the DNA was ethanol-precipitated and resuspended in 50 μL of DNase-free water. For q-PCR, iQTM SYBR® Green supermix and CFX96 q-RT-PCR detection system (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc.) were used. The sequences of the primers used in the q-PCR were: miR-193b_DMR_f1 5’-TGGCGTTTCTGG TTTCTCTT-3’ and miR-193b_DMR_r2 5’-CGCACCTTTTCTCCTCATTT-3’. Each sample was run in duplicate. The methylation status of miR-193b was calculated from the elution-fraction signal in relation to the total q-PCR signal.
Growth curves
For growth analysis with the CDK4/6 inhibitor PD0332991 (Selleck Chemicals, Houston, TX), the 22Rv1 cells were seeded in 24-well plates in quadruplicate for each inhibitor concentration. The following day, the cells were imaged (day 0), and then treated with 0 nmol/L, 100 nmol/L, 500 nmol/L, or 2000 nmol/L inhibitor. The medium was replaced every other day with fresh medium containing the inhibitor. The cells were imaged daily with an Olympus IX71 microscope with the OASIS automation control system and Surveyor imaging software version 5.5.5.26 (Objective Imaging Ltd., Cambridge, UK). Cell growth was analyzed by measuring the cell surface area with an in-house macro and ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD). The experiments were repeated three times.
Statistical analysis
An unpaired t test was used to calculate the significant difference in cell cycle analysis and in luciferase activity between the pre-miR-scramble and pre-miR-193b transfected samples as well as the difference in miR-193b expression between differentially staged prostatectomy tumors. The paired t test was used to calculate the P-value of the growth curve assays on the last day of the experiment. Fisher's exact test was used to assess the significant difference in miR-193b methylation in clinical samples. Fisher's exact, chi-square, Mann–Whitney U, and unpaired t tests were used to analyze the association between clinicopathologic variables. A P-value <0.05 was considered significant. Spearman's correlation was used to study the correlation of miR-193b and CCND1 expression in cell lines and xenograft samples in microarray analysis.
Results
We have previously shown that miR-193b is strongly hypermethylated in 22Rv1 cells and moderately methylated in VCaP cells but is not methylated in LAPC-4, LNCaP, DU145, PC-3, EP156T, or PrEC cells, as determined by bisulfite sequencing 8. In addition, we sequenced five untreated and four CRPC clinical specimens and found increased methylation 8. Here, we wanted to confirm hypermethylation of miR-193b in clinical specimens. We recently performed genome-wide methylation analysis of methylation by MeDIP-sequencing (unpubl. data) and found that the most differentially methylated genomic region in proximity to miR-193b is 16:14396975–14397475 (GRCh37), which is located 349 bp upstream of the miR-193b gene. Here, we measured the methylation of miR-193b in that region in BPH (n = 10), PC (n = 26) and CRPC (n = 9) samples using MethylMiner-qPCR. The samples were classified as methylated if they showed more than 20% methylation. According to our analysis, miR-193b was significantly more methylated in cancer than in BPH (P < 0.0001; Fig.1A).
Next, we measured the expression of miR-193b in a larger set (n = 78) of prostatectomy samples and found that the expression was lower (P < 0.05) in stage pT3 tumors than in stage pT2 tumors (Fig. S1). However, we did not find an association between miR-193b expression and the Gleason score or progression-free survival (data not shown).
Because CCND1 is a suggested target of miR-193b target in hepatocellular and pancreatic carcinoma and melanoma 10,11,14, we aimed to determine if it is also a target in prostate cancer. The expression levels of miR-193b and CCND1 were obtained using expression microarrays of PC cell lines and xenograft samples. The array data showed a negative correlation between miR-193b and CCND1 expression in the cell lines (Fig.1B, r = −0.7714) as well as in the xenograft samples (Fig.1C, r = −0.2522). We then studied the expression of CCND1 mRNA and protein levels in 22Rv1 cells transiently transfected with pre-miR-193b. A marked reduction in the CCND1 expression at both the mRNA (Fig.2A) and protein (Fig.2B) level was detected in cells transfected with pre-miR-193b compared to the scrambled pre-miR transfected cells. Similar to 22Rv1 cells, the Cyclin D1 protein expression was diminished also in VCaP cells transiently transfected with pre-miR-193b (Fig. S2). In addition, a marked reduction was detected in phospho-RB protein level in nuclear protein fractions (Fig.2C).
To confirm that miR-193b binds to the 3’UTR -region of the CCND1 gene in prostate cancer cells, we performed a luciferase reporter assay. A pSGG-luciferase plasmid containing CCND1 3’UTR at the 3’ end of the luciferase gene was transfected together with either pre-miR-193b or pre-miR-scramble into 22Rv1 cells which express low levels of miR-193b endogenously. The inhibition of luciferase activity was observed when the cells were transfected together with the plasmid and pre-miR-193b (P < 0.05) but not with pre-miR-scramble (Fig.3A), confirming that miR-193b targets the 3’UTR of CCND1.
To evaluate the significance of CCND1 as a miR-193b target, a rescue experiment was performed. We used the phosphorylation of RB as a measure of cyclin D1 activity. Phospho-RB levels decreased in cells transfected with pre-miR-193b. When the cells were cotransfected with pre-miR-193b and the pCMV-CCND1 plasmid lacking the 3’UTR of CCND1, no such reduction in phospho-RB levels was observed (Fig.3B). Similarly, transient pre-miR-193b transfection caused a reduction in the number of cells in S and G2/M phase fractions of cell cycle, whereas there was no difference in cells cotransfected with pre-miR-193b and CCND1 lacking 3’UTR (Fig. S3).
Because cyclin D1 regulates the activity of CDK4/6, we treated PC cell lines with the CDK4/6 inhibitor PD0332991 at different concentrations and measured the effect on prostate cancer cell growth. 22Rv1 and VCaP cells, which express low levels of miR-193b and high levels of CCND1, showed significant growth suppression at a 500 nmol/L concentration (P < 0.05; Fig.4A, B), whereas the various concentrations of the inhibitor had little effect on the growth of DU145 (Fig.4C), LNCaP LAPC-4 or PC-3 cells, which express high levels of miR-193b and low levels of CCND1 (Fig. S4A–C). Figure S4D shows that the vehicle, dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), has no effect on the cell growth of 22Rv1 cells at 0.4% concentration.
To study the expression of cyclin D1 in clinical samples, we performed an immunohistochemical analysis on TMAs. The analysis showed that the CRPC samples expressed higher levels of cyclin D1 compared to PC samples (P = 0.0237; Table1). In prostatectomy samples, the cyclin D1 staining intensity was not associated with Gleason score, pT stage, or diagnostic PSA levels. However, there was strong positive association between cyclin D1 and the proliferation marker Ki-67 (P < 0.0001) in the prostatectomy cohort. CRPC cells expressing high levels of cyclin D1 had increased Ki-67 values, although the association was not statistically significant.
Table 1.
Variable | Cyclin D1 expression | P | |
---|---|---|---|
Negative (0/1) | Positive (2–3) | ||
Prostatectomy specimens, n (%) | 74 (37) | 124 (63) | |
Locally recurrent CRPCs, n (%)1 | 20 (29) | 49 (71) | 0.0237 |
Prostatectomy specimens | |||
Gleason score, n (%)1 | |||
<7 | 24 (33) | 46 (37) | |
7 | 38 (52) | 60 (48) | |
>7 | 11 (15) | 19 (15) | 0.8337 |
pT Stage, n (%)2 | |||
pT2 | 54 (75) | 88 (72) | |
pT3 | 18 (25) | 35 (28) | 0.6216 |
PSA ng/mL (mean ± SD)3 | 20.0 ± 31.5 | 14.3 ± 11.3 | 0.9786 |
Age (mean ± SD)4 | 62.6 ± 5.2 | 63.2 ± 4.9 | 0.4167 |
Ki-67 (mean ± SD) | 7.1 ± 7.0 | 13.6 ± 14.5 | <0.0001 |
Locally recurrent CRPCs, n (%)3 | |||
Ki-67 (mean ± SD) | 13.2 ± 9.3 | 20.7 ± 15.8 | 0.0950 |
Chi-square test.
Fisher's exact test.
Mann–Whitney U-test.
Unpaired t test.
Discussion
Here, we confirmed the hypermethylation of miR-193b gene in prostate cancer. The hypermethylation of miR-193b leads to reduced expression, as we have previously shown 8. Because miRNAs regulate the expression of protein-coding genes, the key question is which proteins are targeted by miR-193b in prostate cancer. CCND1 is a target in hepatocellular and pancreatic carcinoma, as well as in melanoma 10,11,14. We have previously shown that the overexpression of miR-193b reduces the proliferation of prostate cancer cells due to a decreased number of cells in S-phase of the cell cycle 8, suggesting that CCND1 could also be a target for miR-193b in prostate cancer.
We showed that the expressions of miR-193b and CCND1 are inversely correlated in prostate cancer cell lines and xenografts. Subsequently, we demonstrated reduced mRNA and protein expression of CCND1 in 22Rv1 cells transiently transfected with pre-miR-193b. Using a reporter assay, we confirmed that miR-193b targets the 3’UTR of the CCND1 gene in 22Rv1 prostate cancer cells. Concordantly, Chen et al. 11. and Xu et al. 10. have previously shown by luciferase assay that miR-193b targets the CCND1 3’UTR in Malme-3M malignant melanoma and HepG2 hepatocellular carcinoma cells. In addition, we performed a rescue experiment, in which we cotransfected miR-193b into 22Rv1 cells with and without the pCMV-CCND1 plasmid lacking the 3’UTR of CCND1. These results show that CCND1 is a bona fide target of miR-193b in prostate cancer cells.
To assess the relevance of cyclin D1 targeting by miR-193b in prostate cancer cells, we studied the activity of the cyclinD1–RB pathway in the regulation of the G1/S transition in the cell cycle. The transfection of 22Rv1 cells with miR-193b reduced the level of phospho-RB, in accordance with the known function of cyclin D1 in the regulation of RB phosphorylation. In addition, the phosphorylated RB protein levels were rescued in pCMV-CCND1/miR-193b cells to those of the control cells. Finally, when prostate cancer cell lines were treated with the CDK4/6 inhibitor PD0332991, the cell lines responded to the treatment according to miR-193b expression/methylation status and cyclin D1 levels. Those with low miR-193b and high cyclin D1 (22Rv1, VCaP) responded to the drug with growth inhibition, while the others did not. These results demonstrate that the downregulation of cyclin D1 by miR-193b is functionally relevant for prostate cancer cell growth.
To assess the clinical significance of cyclin D1, we stained TMAs and found that the expression of cyclin D1 is higher in CRPC (n = 69) compared to hormone-naïve PC (n = 198). Previously, Drobnjak et al. 27. showed increased cyclin D1 staining in 22 CRPC bone metastases compared to 86 primary PC tumors. In our prostatectomy samples, the expression was strongly associated with proliferation but not with Gleason score, pathological status, PSA value, or age at diagnosis. This is in line with previous studies showing that cyclin D1 expression is associated with the proliferation marker Ki-67 but not with other clinicopathological variables 27–31.
Because it is known that one gene can be targeted by several miRNAs and that cyclin D1 is a key regulator of the cell cycle G1/S transition, it is not surprising that CCND1 has been suggested to be a target of more than one miRNA in prostate cancer. Bonci et al. reported that miR15-a and 16-1 interact directly with the 3’UTR of CCND1 and reduce cyclin D1 protein expression, thereby reducing prostate cell proliferation 32. However, the function of CCND1 targeting by these three miRNAs is altered by different mechanisms in prostate cancer. miR-193b is epigenetically regulated and silenced by methylation 8, whereas the function of miRs 15-a and 16-1 is disrupted by deletions in the encoding chromosomal region 13q14 32. We have previously reported a homozygous deletion of the miR15-a and 16-1 locus in prostate cancer, although the frequency is relatively low 33.
In addition to CCND1, there are several other suggested targets for miR-193b, such as YWHAZ,PLAU(aka uPA), and KITin different cancer types 9–16. Xie et al. 34. showed that the knockdown of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) led to the suppression of miR-193b expression. They also showed that the forced overexpression of miR-193b completely abrogated elevated urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) activity after CFTR-knockdown in PC-3 cells, suggesting that the tumor-suppressing effect of CFTR is mediated through the miR-193b-uPA axis. However, it should be noted that miR-193b expression is low in 22Rv1 and VCaP cells 8, which do not express uPA 35,36, suggesting that uPA is not the major target of miR-193b in prostate cancer.
In conclusions, we have demonstrated that the overexpression of cyclin D1 in prostate cancer is driven, at least partly, by the reduced expression of miR-193b. The mechanism for miR-193b suppression is the hypermethylation of the DMR upstream of the miR-193b gene. Additional studies are warranted to translate these findings to clinical benefits. For example, the restoration of miR-193b expression could theoretically reduce the proliferation of prostate cancer cells. Alternatively, the loss of miR-193b expression could indicate the sensitivity of prostate cancer cells to cyclin D1 inhibition.
Acknowledgments
We thank P. Martikainen and M. Vakkuri for the skillful technical assistance. The research leading to these results was funded by Tampere University Doctoral Programme in Biomedicine and Biotechnology. In addition, grant support has been received from the Sigrid Juselius Foundation, the Finnish Cultural Foundation, Pirkanmaa Regional fund, the Academy of Finland, the Cancer Society of Finland, the Medical Research Fund of Tampere University Hospital, and the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme ProspeR (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. HEALTH-F2-2007-201438.
Conflict of Interest
None declared.
Supporting Information
References
- Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E. Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2011;61:69–90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Knudsen KE. Kelly WK. Outsmarting androgen receptor: creative approaches for targeting aberrant androgen signaling in advanced prostate cancer. Expert. Rev. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011;6:483–493. doi: 10.1586/eem.11.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schroder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, Tammela TL, Zappa M, Nelen V, et al. Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up. Lancet. 2014;384:2027–2035. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60525-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Catto JW, Alcaraz A, Bjartell AS, De Vere White R, Evans CP, Fussel S, et al. MicroRNA in prostate, bladder, and kidney cancer: a systematic review. Eur. Urol. 2011;59:671–681. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.01.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee C. Ambros V. An extensive class of small RNAs in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science. 2001;294:862–864. doi: 10.1126/science.1065329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lagos-Quintana M, Rauhut R, Lendeckel W. Tuschl T. Identification of novel genes coding for small expressed RNAs. Science. 2001;294:853–858. doi: 10.1126/science.1064921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Di Leva G. Croce CM. Roles of small RNAs in tumor formation. Trends Mol. Med. 2010;16:257–267. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2010.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rauhala HE, Jalava SE, Isotalo J, Bracken H, Lehmusvaara S, Tammela TL, et al. miR-193b is an epigenetically regulated putative tumor suppressor in prostate cancer. Int. J. Cancer. 2010;127:1363–1372. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li XF, Yan PJ. Shao ZM. Downregulation of miR-193b contributes to enhance urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) expression and tumor progression and invasion in human breast cancer. Oncogene. 2009;28:3937–3948. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu C, Liu S, Fu H, Li S, Tie Y, Zhu J, et al. MicroRNA-193b regulates proliferation, migration and invasion in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Eur. J. Cancer. 2010;46:2828–2836. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.06.127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen J, Feilotter HE, Pare GC, Zhang X, Pemberton JG, Garady C, et al. MicroRNA-193b represses cell proliferation and regulates cyclin D1 in melanoma. Am. J. Pathol. 2010;176:2520–2529. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.091061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen J, Zhang X, Lentz C, Abi-Daoud M, Pare GC, Yang X, et al. miR-193b regulates Mcl-1 in melanoma. Am. J. Pathol. 2011;179:2162–2168. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.07.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gao XN, Lin J, Gao L, Li YH, Wang LL. Yu L. MicroRNA-193b regulates c-Kit proto-oncogene and represses cell proliferation in acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk. Res. 2011;35:1226–1232. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2011.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ikeda Y, Tanji E, Makino N, Kawata S. Furukawa T. MicroRNAs associated with mitogen-activated protein kinase in human pancreatic cancer. Mol. Cancer Res. 2012;10:259–269. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-11-0035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leivonen SK, Rokka A, Ostling P, Kohonen P, Corthals GL, Kallioniemi O, et al. Identification of miR-193b targets in breast cancer cells and systems biological analysis of their functional impact. Mol. Cell Proteomics. 2011;10:M110.005322. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M110.005322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu H, Li S, Liu J. Ni B. MicroRNA-193b modulates proliferation, migration, and invasion of non-small cell lung cancer cells. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. (Shanghai) 2012;44:424–430. doi: 10.1093/abbs/gms018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Musgrove EA, Caldon CE, Barraclough J, Stone A. Sutherland RL. Cyclin D as a therapeutic target in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2011;11:558–572. doi: 10.1038/nrc3090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Knudsen KE, Cavenee WK. Arden KC. D-type cyclins complex with the androgen receptor and inhibit its transcriptional transactivation ability. Cancer Res. 1999;59:2297–2301. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reutens AT, Fu M, Wang C, Albanese C, McPhaul MJ, Sun Z, et al. Cyclin D1 binds the androgen receptor and regulates hormone-dependent signaling in a p300/CBP-associated factor (P/CAF)-dependent manner. Mol. Endocrinol. 2001;15:797–811. doi: 10.1210/mend.15.5.0641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Petre CE, Wetherill YB, Danielsen M. Knudsen KE. Cyclin D1: mechanism and consequence of androgen receptor co-repressor activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:2207–2215. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M106399200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jalava SE, Porkka KP, Rauhala HE, Isotalo J, Tammela TL. Visakorpi T. TCEB1 promotes invasion of prostate cancer cells. Int. J. Cancer. 2009;124:95–102. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Urbanucci A, Sahu B, Seppala J, Larjo A, Latonen LM, Waltering KK, et al. Overexpression of androgen receptor enhances the binding of the receptor to the chromatin in prostate cancer. Oncogene. 2012;31:2153–2163. doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leinonen KA, Tolonen TT, Bracken H, Stenman UH, Tammela TL, Saramaki OR, et al. Association of SPINK1 expression and TMPRSS2: ERG fusion with prognosis in endocrine-treated prostate cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2010;16:2845–2851. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tuominen VJ. Isola J. The application of JPEG2000 in virtual microscopy. J. Digit. Imaging. 2009;22:250–258. doi: 10.1007/s10278-007-9090-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tuominen VJ. Isola J. Linking whole-slide microscope images with DICOM by using JPEG2000 interactive protocol. J. Digit. Imaging. 2010;23:454–462. doi: 10.1007/s10278-009-9200-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tuominen VJ, Ruotoistenmaki S, Viitanen A, Jumppanen M. Isola J. ImmunoRatio: a publicly available web application for quantitative image analysis of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and Ki-67. Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12:R56. doi: 10.1186/bcr2615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Drobnjak M, Osman I, Scher HI, Fazzari M. Cordon-Cardo C. Overexpression of cyclin D1 is associated with metastatic prostate cancer to bone. Clin. Cancer Res. 2000;6:1891–1895. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murphy C, McGurk M, Pettigrew J, Santinelli A, Mazzucchelli R, Johnston PG, et al. Nonapical and cytoplasmic expression of interleukin-8, CXCR1, and CXCR2 correlates with cell proliferation and microvessel density in prostate cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005;11:4117–4127. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aaltomaa S, Eskelinen M. Lipponen P. Expression of cyclin A and D proteins in prostate cancer and their relation to clinopathological variables and patient survival. Prostate. 1999;38:175–182. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0045(19990215)38:3<175::aid-pros1>3.0.co;2-#. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kallakury BV, Sheehan CE, Ambros RA, Fisher HA, Kaufman RP, Jr, Ross JS. The prognostic significance of p34cdc2 and cyclin D1 protein expression in prostate adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 1997;80:753–763. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19970815)80:4<753::aid-cncr15>3.0.co;2-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Comstock CE, Revelo MP, Buncher CR. Knudsen KE. Impact of differential cyclin D1 expression and localisation in prostate cancer. Br. J. Cancer. 2007;96:970–979. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bonci D, Coppola V, Musumeci M, Addario A, Giuffrida R, Memeo L, et al. The miR-15a-miR-16-1 cluster controls prostate cancer by targeting multiple oncogenic activities. Nat. Med. 2008;14:1271–1277. doi: 10.1038/nm.1880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Porkka KP, Ogg EL, Saramaki OR, Vessella RL, Pukkila H, Lahdesmaki H, et al. The miR-15a-miR-16-1 locus is homozygously deleted in a subset of prostate cancers. Genes Chromosom. Cancer. 2011;50:499–509. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xie C, Jiang XH, Zhang JT, Sun TT, Dong JD, Sanders AJ, et al. CFTR suppresses tumor progression through miR-193b targeting urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) in prostate cancer. Oncogene. 2013;32:2282–2291. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.251. , 2291.e1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Helenius MA, Savinainen KJ, Bova GS. Visakorpi T. Amplification of the urokinase gene and the sensitivity of prostate cancer cells to urokinase inhibitors. BJU Int. 2006;97:404–409. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05912.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Prensner JR, Iyer MK, Balbin OA, Dhanasekaran SM, Cao Q, Brenner JC, et al. Transcriptome sequencing across a prostate cancer cohort identifies PCAT-1, an unannotated lincRNA implicated in disease progression. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011;29:742–749. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.