Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 11.
Published in final edited form as: Endocr Pract. 2015 Jun 29;21(9):1040–1045. doi: 10.4158/EP15733.OR

SERUM THYROTROPIN CONCENTRATIONS ARE NOT PREDICTIVE OF AGGRESSIVE BREAST CANCER BIOLOGY IN EUTHYROID INDIVIDUALS

Natalie M Villa 1, Ning Li 2, Michael W Yeh 3, Sara A Hurvitz 4, Nicole A Dawson 5, Angela M Leung 6
PMCID: PMC4567507  NIHMSID: NIHMS720915  PMID: 26121443

Abstract

Objective

The potential influence of hypothyroidism on breast cancer remains incompletely understood. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between serum thyrotropin [thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH)] concentration and markers of aggressive breast cancer biology, as defined by receptor expression profile, tumor grade, and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage characteristics.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients from 2002–2014. All breast cancer patients who had complete receptor (estrogen receptor, ER; progesterone receptor, PR; and Her2/neu) and pre-diagnosis serum TSH data (n=437) were included. All patients had one of six receptor profiles: ER+ PR+ Her2/neu −, ER+ PR− Her2/neu−, ER+ PR+ Her2/neu+, ER+ PRHer2/ neu+, ER− PR− Her2/neu+, ER− PR− Her2/neu−. Log-transformed serum TSH concentrations were analyzed using multinomial and logistic regressions for a potential relationship with markers of breast cancer aggressiveness.

Results

Increasing serum TSH concentration was associated with a lower probability of having the receptor expression profile ER+ PR+ Her2/neu+ compared to patients with the ER+ PR+ Her2/neu− profile (OR=0.52, p=0.0045). No significant associations between other receptor expression profiles and serum TSH concentration were found. All time-weighted and unweighted median serum TSH concentrations were within normal limits. No significant associations between serum TSH concentration and tumor grade, overall AJCC stage, or tumor size (T), lymph node positivity (N), or presence of metastasis (M) were observed.

Conclusions

Serum TSH was not associated with markers of breast cancer aggressiveness in our cohort.

Key terms: Hypothyroidism, breast cancer, TSH, thyrotropin

Introduction

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women with a five-year prevalence of 1.30% in the U.S. (1), while primary hypothyroidism is the most common clinical disorder of thyroid dysfunction, affecting approximately 9.5% of the general U.S. population (2). Although it has been postulated as early as the 1960s that hypothyroidism may be associated with an increased incidence of breast cancer (3), the available limited data on this topic have not shown a definitive relationship (48). Various confounding factors contribute to the challenging aspects of establishing an association between hypothyroidism and breast cancer, as the two conditions have increased prevalence specifically among a similar patient population (i.e. adult women). Breast cancer has also been associated specifically with autoimmune thyroid disease (9) and relative iodine deficiency (1013), conditions which predispose individuals to hypothyroidism.

Prior studies have been inconsistent in demonstrating a definitive association between breast cancer aggressiveness and thyroid disease, particularly thyroid autoimmunity (1416). One study reported that patients with any type of thyroid disease (including hyperthyroid patients) were more likely to have a greater degree of lymph node involvement, a larger primary tumor, and vascular invasion, but there was no significant correlation with breast cancer stage or ER or PR status (17). Farahati et al found that the presence of thyroid peroxidase antibodies (TPO Ab) were protective against distant metastases at the time of presentation, and were inversely related to the levels of breast tumor markers CA-15-3 and CEA (18). Conversely, Mourouzis et al found an inverse correlation between cell proliferation as measured by Ki-67 and free triiodothyronine (T3) levels within the euthyroid range in patients with Her2/Neu+ tumors (19), demonstrating a harmful effect of thyroid function on breast cancer aggressiveness.

The present study investigated the potential relationship between hypothyroidism and breast tumor aggressiveness at a large academic medical center in the U.S., a region which is considered generally iodine-sufficient (20). We hypothesized that breast cancer patients with higher serum thyrotropin [thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH)] levels were more likely to express markers of more aggressive breast cancer biology. The markers included receptor (estrogen receptor [ER], progesterone receptor [PR], and Her2/neu) expression profile, tumor grade, and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage and characteristics.

Patients and Methods

We included all breast cancer patients with known profiles of ER, PR, and Her2/neu receptor status and at least one serum TSH concentration obtained before the diagnosis of breast cancer who received care at our institution between 2002–2014. Labs were obtained at UCLA Health clinical laboratories. Only serum TSH values obtained prior to the diagnosis of breast cancer were used to avoid including any cases of hypothyroidism that developed in the setting of active breast cancer. Breast cancer aggressiveness data (receptor status, grade, and staging) was extracted from the UCLA Cancer Registry, and serum TSH concentrations and demographic information were extracted from the UCLA Integrated Clinical and Research Data Repository. Study approval was obtained from the UCLA Institutional Review Board. The reference range for TSH is 0.3–4.7.

Serum TSH values were log-transformed due to the linear-logarithmic relationship between serum TSH and thyroid hormone concentrations (21) and, for patients with multiple TSH values, weighted to reflect the duration of time between each laboratory assessment. Any data regarding receptor status, height, weight, or family history that was recorded alongside a later diagnosis was updated if missing in the earliest available record.

Weighted log-transformed serum TSH concentrations were evaluated both as a continuous variable and as a categorical variable after the creation of quintiles. The outcome variables were composite receptor expression phenotype (ER, PR, Her2/neu); AJCC stage grouping; and the individual staging elements of tumor size (T), extent of lymph node involvement (N), and extent of metastasis (M). Multinomial regression was performed to evaluate TSH as a predictor of tumor grade, AJCC stage grouping, tumor size (T), and extent of lymph node involvement (N). Logistic regression was performed to evaluate TSH as a predictor of receptor status and the presence of metastasis (M). Because of small sample size, patients with tumor grades 3 and 4 were pooled, as were patients with T0 and T1 tumors, and patients with AJCC stage groupings 0 and 1. Analyses controlled for race/ethnicity as defined by the United States Office of Management and Budget, age at diagnosis, family history of breast cancer (first- and second-degree) and marker of breast cancer aggressiveness (either staging or receptors). Race/ethnicity was grouped into Asian, African-American, Caucasian, and other because several categories had a very small sample size. The group labeled “other” includes American Indian or Alaska Native, multiracial, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, other, and unknown, representing 7.8% of the sample. Receptor expression profiles represented in the cohort were: ER+ PR+ Her2/neu−, ER+ PR− Her2/neu−, ER+ PR+ Her2/neu+, ER+ PR− Her2/neu+, ER− PRHer2/ neu+, ER− PR− Her2/neu−.

Results

A total of 437 patients were included in the study (Table 1), of which 422 (97%) had complete AJCC staging data and 420 (96%) had complete tumor grade data. 95.7% of the patients were euthyroid based on the weighted TSH (0.3–4.7). When TSH concentration was evaluated as a continuous variable, increasing TSH was associated with a lower likelihood of ER+ PR+ Her2/neu+ disease in comparison to ER+ PR+ Her2/neu− disease (OR=0.52, p=0.0045). No other significant associations between TSH as a continuous variable and receptor profile were found (Figure 1). There were no significant associations between serum TSH concentration as a continuous variable and tumor grade, AJCC stage grouping, and individual staging elements (T, N, M). Time-weighted and unweighted median TSH concentrations by tumor grade and AJCC stage are shown in Figures 2 and 3, respectively. When TSH concentration was evaluated as a categorical variable, there were no significant associations between serum TSH concentration and any markers of breast cancer aggressiveness (data not shown). Increasing age at diagnosis was significantly associated with a higher likelihood of T4 breast cancer (OR=1.07, p=0.0053), M1 breast cancer (OR = 1.04, p=0.028), and a lower likelihood of N1 breast cancer (OR=0.98, p=0.0069).

Table 1.

Subject characteristics (n=437)

Age at diagnosis (years), mean ± standard deviation 62.3 ± 15.3
Time-weighted serum thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) (mIU/L), median (interquartile range) 1.81 (0.05–10.42)
Unweighted serum TSH (mIU/L), median (interquartile range) 1.80 (0.07–9.70)
Median (range) number of serum TSH values per patient 3 (1–39)
n (%)
Women 431 (98.6%)
Race/ethnicity as defined by the United States Office of Management and Budget
Asian 65 (14.9%)
African-American 40 (9.2%)
Caucasian 298 (68.2%)
Other 35 (7.8%)
Receptor expression profile
ER+ PR+ Her2/neu− 290 (66.4%)
ER+ PR− Her2/neu− 32 (7.4%)
ER+ PR+ Her2/neu+ 41 (9.4%)
ER+ PR− Her2/neu+ 9 (2.1%)
ER− PR− Her2/neu+ 23 (5.3%)
ER− PR− Her2/neu− 42 (9.6%)
AJCC stage (n=422)
0 10 (2.4%)
I 189 (44.8%)
II 163 (38.6%)
III 40 (9.5%)
IV 20 (4.7%)
Grade (n=420)
1 107 (25.5%)
2 191 (45.5%)
3 121 (28.8%)
4 1 (0.2%)

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Median Serum TSH Concentration per Receptor Expression Profile

*Serum thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) (presented with associated IQR) was evaluated as a continuous variable in this analysis. ER: estrogen receptor. PR: progesterone receptor.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Median Serum TSH Concentration per Tumor Grade

*Serum thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) (presented with associated IQR) was evaluated as a continuous variable in this analysis.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Median Serum TSH Concentration per AJCC Cancer Staging Characteristics

*Stage 0 and Stage I were combined because the incidence of Stage 0 was low. Serum thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) (presented with associated IQR) was evaluated as a continuous variable.

Discussion

Although known risk factors for breast cancer include age, family history of breast cancer, occupational exposure, and reproductive and hormonal influences (1), this malignancy is generally relatively slow-growing, with a lag in clinical detection estimated at 5–10 years (22). Although coexisting conditions may confer additional risks, we demonstrate in our cohort that serum TSH concentrations are not associated with more aggressive breast cancer biology at presentation, as defined by tumor grade or AJCC stage characteristics at initial diagnosis. In addition, the ER+ PR+ Her2/neu− subtype, which is typically associated with more indolent disease biology, was associated with higher serum TSH compared to the more biologically aggressive ER+ PR+ Her2/neu+ subtype (22, 24). There was no significant difference in TSH concentrations between the ER+ PR+ Her2/neu− subtype and the triple negative breast cancer subtype, which is often associated with more aggressive disease biology (25). Furthermore, both the time-weighted and unweighted median serum TSH concentrations were within normal limits for all profiles. The evaluation of serum TSH as a categorical variable also did not yield an association with any markers of breast cancer aggressiveness. As there was no consistent significant trend between the various receptor expression profiles and serum TSH concentrations, we conclude that serum TSH concentration is not predictive of breast cancer aggressiveness as defined by receptor expression profile in this cohort.

Existing literature on the relationship between breast cancer prevalence (rather than aggressiveness) and hypothyroidism are also limited by a potential selection bias, in which women with a chronic illness, such as hypothyroidism, may be more likely to undergo more frequent medical care, thereby potentially resulting in a greater incidence of disease detection. One study reported that hypothyroid women were more likely to have breast cancer diagnosed at an earlier stage compared to euthyroid controls (6). The present study is unique due to the assessment of the relationship between serum TSH concentration and breast cancer aggressiveness, rather than breast cancer prevalence. In addition, we evaluated serum TSH concentrations as a weighted measure by duration of all values available prior to the diagnosis of breast cancer, rather than the TSH result closest to the time of diagnosis.

One limitation of our study is the use of elevated serum TSH concentrations to define hypothyroidism, which excludes patients with isolated hypothyroxinemia, and thereby does not address the potential association of hypothyroidism as a specific disease category and breast cancer aggressiveness. Other studies assessing these relationships have also assessed positive thyroperoxidase autoantibody (TPO Ab) titers as indicators of thyroid disease (45, 7, 9, 15, 2630), which we did not evaluate in our cohort. Additionally, our sample may be predisposed to abnormal serum TSH concentrations, as this screening test for thyroid dysfunction is not routinely obtained unless there is a clinical suspicion or positive family history; however, the median serum TSH of the study population was in the euthyroid range.

Further research may be useful in assessing whether particular thyroid disorders, including thyroid autoimmunity and/or altered dietary iodine nutrition, may be predisposing factors to more aggressive breast cancer or higher breast cancer incidence and/or prevalence. Finally, as only a small proportion of the sample in this study had aggressive tumor biology markers, a larger prospective study would be helpful in defining whether thyroid disease is associated with breast cancer biology.

Conclusion

Serum TSH was not associated with breast cancer receptor expression profile, tumor grade, or AJCC stage characteristics, suggesting that serum TSH is not a conclusive predictor of breast cancer aggressiveness in this sample.

Acknowledgments

Funding: This work was supported by NIH K23HD068552 (AML) and NIH/National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) UCLA CTSI Grant Number UL1TR000124.

Abbreviations

AJCC

American Joint Committee on Cancer

ER

estrogen receptor

L

lymph node positivity

M

metastasis

PR

progesterone receptor

T

tumor size

TPO Ab

thyroid peroxidase antibody

TSH

thyroid stimulating hormone

UCLA

University of California Los Angeles

Footnotes

Disclosure Statement: The authors have nothing to disclose.

References

  • 1.De Angelis R, Tavilla A, Verdecchia A, et al. Breast cancer survivors in the United States: geographic variability and time trends, 2005–2015. Cancer. 2009;115:1954–1966. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Canaris GJ, Manowitz NR, Mayor G, et al. The Colorado thyroid disease prevalence study. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:526–534. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.4.526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Stoll BA. Breast cancer and hypothyroidism. Cancer. 1965 Nov;18:1431–1436. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(196511)18:11<1431::aid-cncr2820181108>3.0.co;2-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bhargav PR, Mishra A, Agarwal G, et al. Prevalence of hypothyroidism in benign breast disorders and effect of thyroxine replacement on the clinical outcome. World J Surg. 2009;33:2087–2093. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0143-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kuijpens JL, Nyklictek I, Louwman MW, et al. Hypothyroidism might be related to breast cancer in post-menopausal women. Thyroid. 2005;15:1253–1259. doi: 10.1089/thy.2005.15.1253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cristofanilli M, Yamamura Y, Kau SW, et al. Thyroid hormone and breast carcinoma: Primary hypothyroidism is associated with a reduced incidence of primary breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2005;103:1122–1128. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Smyth PP, Shering SG, Kilbane MT, et al. Serum thyroid peroxidase autoantibodies, thyroid volume, and outcome in breast carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83:2711–2716. doi: 10.1210/jcem.83.8.5049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Smyth P, Smith DF, McDermott E, et al. The thyroid in breast cancer—new evidence to support an old story. Proceedings of the 78th Annual Meeting of the American Thyroid Association; Oct 4–7, 2007; New York City, US. Abstract 157. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Turken O, Narin Y, Demirbas S, et al. Breast cancer in association with thyroid disorders. Breast Cancer Res. 2003;5:R110–R113. doi: 10.1186/bcr609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Eskin BA. Iodine and mammary cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1977;91:293–304. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-0796-9_20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Venturi S. Is there a role for iodine in breast diseases? Breast. 2001;10:379–382. doi: 10.1054/brst.2000.0267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kilbane MT, Ajjan RA, Weetman AP, et al. Tissue iodine content and serum-mediated 125I uptake-blocking activity in breast cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85:1245–1250. doi: 10.1210/jcem.85.3.6442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cann SA, Van Netten JP, Van Netten C. Hypothesis: iodine, selenium and the development of breast cancer. Cancer Causes Control. 2000;11:121–127. doi: 10.1023/a:1008925301459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Giani C, Fierabracci P, Bonacci R, et al. Relationship between breast cancer and thyroid disease: relevance of autoimmune thyroid disorders in breast malignancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81:990–994. doi: 10.1210/jcem.81.3.8772562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fiore E, Giustarini E, Mammoli C, et al. Favorable predictive value of thyroid autoimmunity in high aggressive breast cancer. J Endocrinol Invest. 2007;30:734–738. doi: 10.1007/BF03350810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Einefors R, Kogler U, Ellberg C, et al. Autoimmune diseases and hypersensitivities improve the prognosis in ER-negative breast cancer. Springerplus. 2013;2:357. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Michalaki V, Kondi-pafiti A, Gennatas S, et al. Breast cancer in association with thyroid disorders. J BUON. 2009;14:425–428. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Farahati J, Roggenbuck D, Gilman E, Schutte M, Jagminaite E, Seyed Zakavi R, Loning T, Heissen E. Anti-thyroid peroxidase antibodies are associated with the absence of distant metastases in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2012;50:709–714. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mourouzis I, Tzovaras A, Armonis B, Ardavanis A, Skondra M, Misitzis J, Pectasides D, Pantos C. Are thyroid hormone and tumor cell proliferation in human breast cancers positive for HER2 associated? Int J Endocrinol. 2015;2015:765406. doi: 10.1155/2015/765406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Iodine deficiency: Where is the problem? International Council for the Control of Iodine Deficiency Disorders (ICCIDD) Global Network. [Accessed February 15, 2015]; http://www.iccidd.org/p142000253.html. Published 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Spencer CA, LoPresti JS, Patel A, et al. Applications of a new chemiluminometric thyrotropin assay to subnormal measurement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1990;70:453–460. doi: 10.1210/jcem-70-2-453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Santen RJ. Does menopausal hormone therapy initiate new breast cancers or promote the growth of existing ones? Women’s Health (Lond Engl) 2008;4:207–210. doi: 10.2217/17455057.4.3.207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, et al. Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science. 1987;235:177–182. doi: 10.1126/science.3798106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Slamon DJ, Godolphin W, Jones LA, et al. Studies of the HER-2/neu proto-oncogene in human breast and ovarian cancer. Science. 1989;244:707–712. doi: 10.1126/science.2470152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nishimura R, Arima N. Is triple negative a prognostic factor in breast cancer? Breast Cancer. 2008;15:303–308. doi: 10.1007/s12282-008-0042-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cengiz O, Bozkurt B, Unal B, et al. The relationship between prognostic factors of breast cancer and thyroid disorders in Turkish women. J Surg Oncol. 2004;87:19–25. doi: 10.1002/jso.20071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jiskra J, Límanová Z, Barkmanová J, et al. Autoimmune thyroid diseases in women with breast cancer and colorectal cancer. Physiol Res. 2004;53:693–702. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Giustarini E, Pinchera A, Fierabracci P, et al. Thyroid autoimmunity in patients with malignant and benign breast diseases before surgery. Eur J Endocrinol. 2006;154:645–649. doi: 10.1530/eje.1.02108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jiskra J, Barkmanova J, Limanova Z, et al. Thyroid autoimmunity occurs more frequently in women with breast cancer compared to women with colorectal cancer and controls but it has no impact on relapse-free and overall survival. Oncol Rep. 2007;18:1603–1611. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Prinzi N, Baldini E, Sorrenti S, et al. Prevalence of breast cancer in thyroid diseases: results of a cross-sectional study of 3,921 patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;144:683–688. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-2893-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES