Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Heart. 2015 Aug 4;101(19):1584–1590. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308098

Table 3.

LV Geometric Findings

Variable N Normotensive Pregnancy (n=2210) Hypertensive Pregnancy (n=427) P
PWTd (cm) 2552 0.75 ± 0.10 0.77 ± 0.10 <0.001
IVSd (cm) 2552 0.82 ± 0.11 0.85 ± 0.11 <0.001
RWT 2551 0.316 ± 0.043 0.323 ± 0.044 0.002
Log(LVIDd) 2552 1.60 ± 0.08 1.61 ± 0.09 0.027
 LVIDd (cm)* 4.97 5.02
Log(LVMI) 2500 4.28 ± 0.21 4.31 ± 0.23 0.005
 LVMI (g/m2)* 71.9 74.5
LVMI > 95 g/m2 2500 10.3% 15.8% 0.002
LV geometry** 2500
 Normal geometry 87.9% 82.3%
 Concentric remodeling 1.9% 2.3%
 Concentric hypertrophy 0.8% 0.8%
 Eccentric hypertrophy 9.5% 14.8%

Values shown are means ± standard deviation or percentages adjusted for age, race, education, and network.

LV: Left ventricular; PWTd: diastolic posterior wall thickness; IVSd: diastolic intraventricular septal thickness; LVIDd: End-diastolic LV internal dimension; LVMI: LV mass index (indexed to body surface area); RWT: Relative wall thickness (PWTd+IVSd)/LVIDd

*

Models were fit with log-transformed values. The means have been back-transformed to raw units for interpretability.

**

Unadjusted percentages are shown. Analyses were not done to compare LV geometry across the groups adjusting for covariates due to the limited number of subjects with concentric geometry types.