Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 14.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomed Opt. 2015 Aug 1;20(8):80503. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.20.8.080503

Quantification of light attenuation in optically cleared mouse brains

Angela d’Esposito a, Daniil Nikitichev b, Adrien Desjardins b,*, Simon Walker-Samuel a,*, Mark F Lythgoe a,*
PMCID: PMC4568291  EMSID: EMS64113  PMID: 26277988

Abstract

Optical clearing, in combination with recently developed optical imaging techniques, enables visualization and acquisition of high resolution, three-dimensional images of biological structures deep within tissue. Many different approaches can be used to reduce light absorption and scattering within the tissue, but there is a paucity of research on the quantification of clearing efficacy. With the use of a custom-made spectroscopy system, we developed a way to quantify the quality of clearing in biological tissue, and applied it to the mouse brain. Three clearing techniques were compared: BABB (Murray’s clear), pBABB (a modification of BABB which includes the use of hydrogen peroxide) and passive CLARITY. Despite being limited to autofluorescence studies, we found that pBABB produced the highest degree of optical clearing. Furthermore, the approach allows regional measurement of light attenuation to be performed, and. our results show that light is most attenuated in regions with high lipid content. This work provides a way to choose between the multiple clearing protocols available, and it could prove useful for evaluating images that are acquired with cleared tissues.

Keywords: optical clearing, refractive index, mouse brain, spectroscopy

1.Introduction

The ability to analyze tissue in 3D at the mesoscopic scale has proven essential in the study of healthy and diseased organisms and organs. Techniques such as ex-vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and X-ray computed tomography (CT) have been successful in a number of applications, but are limited by low resolution or inability to use common staining techniques. These limitations are overcome by optical imaging techniques such as Optical Projection Tomography1 and Light Sheet Fluorescence Microscopy2. However, to allow for sufficient depth penetration, these imaging techniques require specimens to be rendered transparent via a process known as optical clearing, which can be achieved using a number of techniques. In general, these techniques aim to minimize scattering and absorption of both illumination and detection light within the sample, and can achieve light penetration increase up to several millimeters3. Light in the body is absorbed by structures such as red blood cells, and is scattered at the interface of materials with different refractive indices. Some approaches obtain refractive index matching by replacing extracellular water (n ≈ 1.35) with solutions with a higher refractive index, closer to that of the cell membrane (n ≈ 1.46). As lipids are the main scatterers in biological tissue4, other approaches obtain a uniform refractive index by their removal5.

In this paper, the efficiency of three clearing techniques is compared: BABB (Murray’s clear)3, pBABB (a modification of BABB with hydrogen peroxide) and passive CLARITY6,7. A new method for measuring the clearing degree using a custom-made spectroscopy system was developed and used to evaluate the obtained transparency in the mouse brain. Three regions of the mouse brain were studied: olfactory bulb, pons, and cerebellum. These areas differ in their microscopic structure and amounts of myelin, which surrounds axons and has high lipid content. The absorption spectra for each of the mouse brain regions and for each clearing method were compared and used for quantification of the quality of clearing. Moreover, the change in the sizes of the samples induced by each clearing technique was also evaluated.

2. Methods

All experimental study protocols were conducted in accordance with institutional, UK home office regulations. MF1 nu/nu mice were individually heparinized and terminally anaesthetized. Once anesthesia was confirmed, surgical procedures for intracardial perfusion were performed for systemic clearance of blood. 30 ml of phosphate buffered saline (37°C) were administered at a flow rate of 5 ml/min, followed by administration of 40 ml of 4% formaldehyde solution. Brains were extracted and post-fixed for 12 hours in 4% formaldehyde (4 °C), then rinsed in PBS and sliced to obtain 2 mm sagittal slices. The two central slices close to the midline, one per hemisphere, were used for the light attenuation quantitation study. For each clearing technique, between 6 and 12 mice were evaluated. Tissues were then optically cleared with three procedures. For BABB clearing, samples were dehydrated in methanol (MeOH) for 48 hours at room temperature and transferred for clearing in BABB (1:2 mixture of benzyl alcohol and benzyl benzoate) for 48 hours. For pBABB clearing, samples were bleached in a 4:1:1 mixture of methanol: dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO): hydrogen peroxide (Dent’s bleach) prior to dehydration with MeOH and clearing with BABB. DMSO was used to enhance tissue penetration8. The samples cleared with CLARITY were prepared according to the passive protocol7, which aims to remove lipids by passive thermal clearing (37 °C) and preserve tissue structure by hydrogel embedding.

Light transmission spectra were acquired with a custom made spectroscopic system in three areas of the brain: pons, cerebellum and olfactory bulb (Fig.1).

Fig.1.

Fig.1

Images of 2 mm mouse brain slices before and after optical clearing. The brains, originally opaque (a), were optically cleared with (b) BABB, (c) pBABB, and (d) CLARITY to achieve tissue transparency. The areas where spectroscopic light attenuation measurements were performed are shown in (a). The images have the same spatial scale.

The light emitted by a halogen lamp was coupled to a 200 μm fiber and collimated to a 3 mm-diameter beam that illuminated the brain slice. The cleared sample was sandwiched between two glass cover slips and placed in a custom-designed, 3D printed sample holder with 2 mm spacing. To allow for regions within the sample to be selectively illuminated by the beam, the holder was placed onto two linear translation stages. Transmitted light was fibre coupled and directed to a spectrometer (MayaPro, Ocean Optics, Duiven, The Netherlands). Since light scattering and absorption are wavelength dependent10, data were acquired with the spectrometer in the wavelength range of 400 to 1100 nm. Background and reference spectra were taken with no sample in the holder and with BABB, respectively. Post processing of the data was performed with Matlab. The attenuation coefficient μT of each brain tissue slice with thickness x (mm) was estimated using Eq. (1):

μT(λ)=1xln(I(λ)Ib(λ)I0(λ)Ib(λ)), (1)

where I, I0, and Ib are the spectra acquired with light transmission through the sample, through the reference solution (BABB), and through air in the absence of light, respectively, and lambda is the wavelength.

3. Results and Discussion

Transmission spectra acquired in the brain samples showed that the efficacy of optical clearing varied depending on clearing technique and tissue region (Fig. 2). Moreover, samples cleared with pBABB and BABB resulted in lower attenuation coefficients than those cleared with CLARITY. For instance, the mean attenuation coefficients in the pons were 1.09 ± 0.28 mm−1 and 0.75 ± 0.10 mm−1 for BABB and pBABB, respectively; they were 1.89 ± 0.19 mm−1 for CLARITY. Furthermore, the shapes of the spectra acquired from CLARITY samples differed prominently from that of brains cleared with BABB and pBABB, with the attenuation peak occurring at a higher wavelength than for BABB-cleared samples (480 nm for BABB, compared with 560 nm for CLARITY in the pons).

Fig.2.

Fig.2

Light attenuation spectra acquired in three brain regions show the comparison of the tissue transparency degree obtained with three clearing techniques. The spectra were calculated with Equation (1) and averaged over all measured brains.

The data presented in this study show that light attenuation in cleared brain tissue was greatest in samples cleared with passive CLARITY, and lowest in those cleared with pBABB or BABB. The significantly lower absorption by BABB samples at higher wavelengths (> 600 nm) could perhaps be exploited for the optimization of imaging of fluorophores with emission at such wavelengths.

Structural tissue modifications such as dehydration or lipid extraction lead to tissue swelling or shrinkage. Evaluation of the change in size of brain samples was assessed from tissue cross-sectional areas before and after clearing. Measurements showed a decrease in size with BABB and pBABB clearing (58% and 56%, respectively), most likely caused by the dehydration step, and a large increase in size was found with passive CLARITY (229%). Regarding the swelling induced by the CLARITY protocol, care is needed in the hydrogel preparation step and in the incubation temperature of the sample for hydrogel polymerization (37°C). Both of the size changes cause by the examined techniques could be confounding factors in morphological studies, and should be taken into account when choosing a clearing approach for a particular application.

Of the three brain regions investigated, the pons showed the lowest clearing efficacy, most likely due to its greater grey matter density. Grey matter contains large quantities of myelin, a lipid-based substance that contributes significantly to optical scattering10,11. In this study, a new clearing technique called pBABB was also investigated, in which hydrogen peroxide is added to the dehydration medium. This step is beneficial as it enables the bleaching of endogenous tissue pigments, thereby reducing autofluorescence. Moreover, DMSO acts as a solvent increasing the clearing solution penetration without damaging the tissue12. This methodology is also particularly advantageous as it is straightforward and inexpensive, and clearing times are considerably shorter when compared to techniques such as CLARITY. However, BABB, as with most of the techniques that make use of organic solvents for refractive index matching, has the main disadvantage of decreasing the half-life of the fluorescent signal13, most probably due to peroxide contamination14. Despite the highest degree of tissue clearing which can be obtained with pBABB, this approach is only applicable to autofluorescence studies to look at tissue morphology, due to the bleaching step with hydrogen peroxide. Conversely, the CLARITY protocol produces minimal protein loss and preserves native fluorescence5.

4. Conclusion

This study demonstrated a novel method to quantify the efficacy of optical clearing protocols, which is an essential step in the process of choosing a clearing approach for a specific application and in the stage of imaging data evaluation. The results showed that the degree of clearing obtained with pBABB methodology is greater than those given by BABB and CLARITY, and that differences exist in the shape of absorption spectra, particularly at wavelengths greater than 600 nm. It is also been shown that the level of optical clearing varies within the brain, most likely due to the structure and composition of each particular area. The study focussed on three optical clearing techniques and on optical clearing of brain but could easily be applied to any other method or organ. This work could help guide the choice of the most suitable optical clearing method for a specific application. Furthermore, assessing the transparency of a tissue is particularly important when imaging cleared samples with systems like Optical Projection Tomography or light sheet microscopy, as reduced light scattering can lead to higher spatial resolution and greater contrast15.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from the Rosetrees Trust (M135). SWS is supported by the Wellcome Trust (WT100247MA). The authors thank Dr Bertrand Vernay from the Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh for insightful discussions during the study.

References

  • 1.Sharpe J, et al. Optical projection tomography as a tool for 3D microscopy and gene expression studies. Science. 2002;296(5567):541–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1068206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Huisken J, et al. Selective plane illumination microscopy techniques in developmental biology. Development. 2009;136(12):1963–75. doi: 10.1242/dev.022426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dodt H, et al. Ultramicroscopy: three-dimensional visualization of neuronal networks in the whole mouse brain. Nature Methods. 2007;4(4):331–336. doi: 10.1038/nmeth1036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Susaki EA, et al. Whole-brain imaging with single-cell resolution using chemical cocktails and computational analysis. Cell. 2014;157(3):726–39. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chung K, et al. CLARITY for mapping the nervous system. Nat. Methods. 2013;10(6):508–13. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chung K, et al. Structural and molecular interrogation of intact biological systems. Nature. 2013;497(7449):332–7. doi: 10.1038/nature12107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tomer R, et al. Advanced CLARITY for rapid and high-resolution imaging of intact tissues. Nat. Protoc. 2014;9(7):1682–97. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2014.123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ursin C, et al. Permeability of commercial solvents through living human skin. Adv. Indust. Envt. Hyg. 1995;56:651–660. doi: 10.1080/15428119591016665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Schurr A, et al. Brain Slices in Basic and Clinical Research. CRC Press; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Roggan A, et al. Determination of optical tissue properties with double integrating sphere technique and Monte Carlo simulations. Proc. SPIE. 1994;2100:42–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yaroslavsky AN, et al. Optical properties of selected native and coagulated human brain tissues in vitro in the visible and near infrared spectral range. Phys. Med. Biol. 2002;47:2059–2073. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/47/12/305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jiang J, et al. Penetration kinetics of dimethyl sulphoxide and glycerol in dynamic optical clearing of porcine skin tissue in vitro studied by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic imaging. J. Biomed. Opt. 2008;13(2):021105. doi: 10.1117/1.2899153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Becker K, et al. Chemical clearing and dehydration of GFP expressing mouse brains. PLoS One. 2012;7(no. 3):e33916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Alnuami A, et al. Oxyradical-induced GFP damage and loss of fluorescence. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2008;43:182–186. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2008.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tuchin V, et al. Light propagation in tissues with controlled optical properties. J. Biomed. Opt. 1997;2:401–417. doi: 10.1117/12.281502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES