Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Immunol Res. 2015 Feb 3;3(7):727–740. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-15-0004

SOCS3 Deficiency in Myeloid Cells Promotes Tumor Development: Involvement of STAT3 Activation and Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells

Hao Yu 1, Yudong Liu 1, Braden C McFarland 1, Jessy S Deshane 2, Douglas R Hurst 3, Selvarangan Ponnazhagan 3, Etty N Benveniste 1,*, Hongwei Qin 1,*
PMCID: PMC4570503  NIHMSID: NIHMS661216  PMID: 25649351

Abstract

Suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS) proteins are negative regulators of the JAK/STAT pathway, and generally function as tumor suppressors. The absence of SOCS3 in particular leads to heightened activation of the STAT3 transcription factor, which has a striking ability to promote tumor survival while suppressing antitumor immunity. We report for the first time that genetic deletion of SOCS3 specifically in myeloid cells significantly enhances tumor growth, which correlates with elevated levels of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) in the tumor microenvironment, and diminished CD8+ T-cell infiltration in tumors. The importance of MDSCs in promoting tumor growth is documented by reduced tumor growth upon depletion of MDSCs. Furthermore, SOCS3-deficient bone-marrow-derived cells exhibit heightened STAT3 activation and preferentially differentiate into the Gr-1+CD11b+Ly6G+ MDSC phenotype. Importantly, we identify granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) as a critical factor secreted by the tumor microenvironment that promotes development of MDSCs via a STAT3-dependent pathway. Abrogation of tumor-derived G-CSF reduces the proliferation and accumulation of Gr-1+CD11b+ MDSCs and inhibits tumor growth. These findings highlight the critical function of SOCS3 as a negative regulator of MDSC development and function, via inhibition of STAT3 activation.

INTRODUCTION

The Janus kinase/signal transducers and activators of transcription (JAK/STAT) signaling pathway is utilized by numerous cytokines, and is critical for induction of innate and adaptive immunity, and ultimately suppressing inflammatory and immune responses (1). Of the seven STAT proteins, STAT3 has been implicated in inducing and maintaining an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (2, 3). The persistent activation of STAT3 mediates tumor-promoting inflammation, tumor survival and invasion, and suppression of antitumor immunity (3). Hyperactivation of STAT3 is implicated in tumor progression and poor patient prognosis in a large number of cancers, including breast, prostate, melanoma, pancreatic cancer and brain tumors (3). Activating mutations in STAT3 are rare, thus STAT3 hyperactivation is usually caused by an over-abundance of cytokines such as IL6 and/or dysregulation of endogenous negative regulators, most notably, suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS) proteins (46). There are eight SOCS proteins: SOCS1-7 and CIS, which inhibit the duration of cytokine-induced JAK/STAT signaling. The predominant function of SOCS3 is inhibition of STAT3 activation by inhibiting JAK kinase activity (5, 7). As such, loss of SOCS3 expression leads to hyperactivation of JAKs and downstream STAT3, and expression of STAT3-mediated genes.

SOCS3 is tightly linked to cancer cell proliferation, as well as cancer-associated inflammation (8). Yet, the role of SOCS3 in various types of cancer is controversial; there are reports of either increased or reduced SOCS3 expression in breast and prostate cancer (912). In other cancers, including gastric cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and colon cancer, SOCS3 functions as a tumor suppressor (8). The loss of SOCS3 expression by hypermethylation of the SOCS3 promoter is generally associated with poor clinical outcome, metastasis and aggressive phenotype (9). In pre-clinical models, conditional knock-down of SOCS3 results in accelerated tumorigenesis, which is associated with hyper-activation of various signaling pathways, including STAT3 (8).

The inflammatory milieu within the microenvironment of cancers supports tumor cell survival and angiogenesis. In tumor models and human cancers, innate leukocytes are predominantly of myeloid origin, and are composed of tumor-associated macrophages, dendritic cells (DC), and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) (13, 14). MDSCs, characterized by expression of CD11b and Gr-1, are a heterogeneous population of activated immature myeloid cells found within tumors that exert immunosuppressive properties (1315). MDSCs have the capacity to suppress the cytotoxic activities of natural killer (NK) and NKT cells, and adaptive immune responses elicited by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (15, 16). Under normal conditions, Gr-1+CD11b+ cells are maintained at very low levels, but in patients with tumors, those cells can make up to 50% of total CD45+ hematopoietic cells in the tumor mass (17). Numbers of MDSCs in tumors are negatively associated with overall survival and treatment efficacy in patients with colorectal, pancreatic and prostate cancer (18). In a tumor-promoting environment, MDSCs expand and migrate from the bone marrow (BM) into the blood, spleen and tumors induced by numerous cytokines and soluble mediators including M-CSF, G-CSF, GM-CSF, IL6, IL1, TNFα and S100A8/S100A9 (14, 1923). The expansion and functional activation of MDSCs involves numerous transcription factors, with STAT3 being the most crucial (24).

We recently demonstrated that deletion of SOCS3 in myeloid cells (neutrophils, DCs, monocytes/macrophages) leads to heightened activation of STAT3, and enhanced expression of proinflammatory genes including IL1, TNFα, IL6 and iNOS (25, 26). To investigate the function of myeloid SOCS3 in tumor growth, the TRAMP model of prostate cancer was examined in SOCS3 floxed (SOCS3fl/fl) and SOCS3 myeloid-specific deletion (SOCS3MyeKO) mice. Our results demonstrate that prostate tumor growth is significantly enhanced in SOCS3MyeKO mice, and is associated with elevated levels of Gr-1+CD11b+ MDSCs in tumors of SOCS3-deficient mice. We identify G-CSF as a critical factor secreted by the tumor microenvironment that promotes MDSC expansion via a STAT3/SOCS3-dependent pathway. Abrogation of tumor-derived G-CSF inhibits tumor growth by reducing the accumulation of MDSCs. Our results highlight the important role of myeloid SOCS3 in regulating the development of MDSCs, and demonstrate that in the absence of SOCS3, an immunosuppressive milieu is established in the tumor microenvironment that promotes tumor growth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mice

Mice 6–8 weeks of age were used. C57BL/6 and transgenic OT-1 mice (specific to OVA peptide257–264) (27) were bred at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) (Birmingham, AL). SOCS3 conditional knockout (SOCS3MyeKO) mice were generated by breeding of SOCS3fl/fl mice (28) with mice expressing Cre recombinase under the control of the LysM promoter, in which the conditional SOCS3 allele is excised in myeloid cells (25). All experiments were approved by the IACUC of UAB.

Cell Lines and Primary Cells

Murine epithelial prostate cancer cells TRAMP-C1 and TRAMP-C2 were cultured in DMEM medium with 10% FBS (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Conditioned media (CM) was generated by incubation of TRAMP-C1 or C2 cells for 48 h. Primary BM cells were flushed from the femur and tibia of mice (25, 26), and cultured under conditions to generate MDCSs, including TRAMP CM, 10 ng/ml of murine GM-CSF or 20 ng/ml of murine G-CSF for 3–4 days.

Peptides, Antibodies, Cytokines and Lentiviral Vector

OVA257–264 (SIINFEKL) was obtained from AnaSpec (Fremont, CA). Antibodies (Abs) against phospho-STAT3 (Tyr705) and STAT3 were from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA), and Ab against GAPDH was from Abcam (Cambridge, MA). Neutralizing Ab to G-CSF (MAB414) and isotype control (IgG1) were from R&D Systems (San Diego, CA). Neutralizing Ab to Gr-1 (RB6-8C5) and isotype control (IgG2b) were from BioXcell (West Lebanon, NH). Recombinant murine G-CSF and GM-CSF were from R&D Systems (San Diego, CA). Lentiviral expression of SOCS3 was generated as described (29).

Tumor Models and Ab Treatment

TRAMP-C1 or C2 cells (3.0 × 106) in 100 µl of PBS were s.c. inoculated into the flank of SOCS3fl/fl or SOCS3MyeKO mice. Tumor volumes were calculated using the formula (0.5 × l × w2, where l is length and w is width). Three weeks after s.c. inoculation of TRAMP-C1 cells, anti-mouse G-CSF Ab or isotype control Ab (10 µg per mouse) was administered intraperitoneally every two days for a total of 9 treatments (19, 20). For Gr-1+ cell depletion, mice were treated with anti-Gr-1 or control Ab (100 µg per mouse) every two days for a total of 9 treatments (21). In an orthotopic model, 5.0 × 105 TRAMP-C2 cells in 50 µl of PBS were injected into the ventrolateral prostate gland, and analyzed after 30 days (30).

Flow Cytometry

Subcutaneous TRAMP tumors, prostate-containing tumor, and normal prostate tissue were minced into fragments, and incubated in collagenase solution in the presence of DNase I (1 mg/ml) at 37°C for 1 h. Dissociated cells were passed through a 100 µm cell strainer. Spleens or BM extracted from mouse femurs were homogenized and passed through a 100 µm cell strainer. Cells were resuspended and stained with direct labeled Abs against: CD45 (30-F11), CD11b (M1/70), Gr-1 (RB6-8C5), Ly6G (1A8) and Ly6C (HK1.4) (BioLegend); and B220 (RA3-6B2), F4/80 (BM8) and CD11c (N418) (eBioscience). For T-cell analysis, Abs from BioLegend were used: CD3 (145-2C11), CD4 (GK1.5), CD8 (53-6.7), IFNγ (XMG1.2) and Foxp3 (MF-14). Mouse G-CSF R/CD114 Ab was from R&D Systems. For intracellular staining, Abs against phospho-STAT3 (Y705) and phosphor-STAT5 (Y694) (BioLegend) were used. Staining was performed as previously described (25, 31). All samples were analyzed on an LSRIIB FACS instrument and were further analyzed with FlowJo software.

Isolation of Gr-1+CD11b+ Cells and Functional T-cell Suppression Assay

Single-cell suspensions were prepared from tumors or spleens by digestion with Collagenase/Dispase and DNase for 1 h at 37°C. Gr-1+CD11b+ myeloid cells were sorted by FACSAria (>90%). Splenocytes isolated from OT-1 mice were resuspended at 10 × 106 cells/ml and incubated with CFSE (0.5 µM) at room temperature for 10 min. Suppression of T cells was evaluated in a co-culture system with OT-1 splenocytes (1 × 106 per well) with increasing ratios of Gr-1+CD11b+ cells in the presence of OVA peptide (3 µg/ml). OT-1 CD8+ T cells were evaluated on day 3 by flow cytometry for CFSE dilution. The percent of dividing cells was determined by drawing a gate outside a reference CFSE peak from unstimulated CFSE+ cells.

Nitric Oxide Detection, IFNγ Production and Arginase Activity Assay

Nitric oxide production was evaluated in supernatants from co-cultured Gr-1+CD11b+ cells and OT-1 T cells using the Griess Reagent System (Promega) (25). The same culture supernatants were evaluated for IFNγ production using an IFNγ ELISA kit (BioLegend) (25). Arginase activity was measured in cell lysates using the QuantichromTM Arginase Assay Kit (BioAssay Systems, Hayward, CA) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Cytology of Gr-1+CD11b+ Cells

CD45+Gr-1+CD11b+ cells were sorted from spleens or tumors of TRAMP-C1 tumor-bearing mice using FACSAria. Cytospin preparations were stained with Diff-Quick modified Giemsa reagent (Polysciences) according to the manufacturer’s protocols.

In Vivo Cell Proliferation Assay

Naïve or TRAMP-C1 tumor-bearing mice were injected intraperitoneally with 100 µg EdU (Invitrogen). After 20 h, mice were sacrificed and single-cell suspensions prepared from BM, spleens and tumors. Cells were stained with Alexa Fluor 647 Azide according to the Click-iT® EdU Flow Cytometry Assay Kits (Invitrogen) (31).

Histopathology and Immunofluorescence

Slides were stained with nuclear dye (hematoxylin), and then stained with counterstain (eosin). Immunofluorescence was performed with Abs to CD45 (1:50) or Gr-1 (1:100). Sections were fixed in 3% formaldehyde, blocked with 10% donkey serum for 30 min, labeled with primary antibody overnight at 4°C, then incubated with Alexa Fluor 568 secondary antibody (Invitrogen; 1:200) along with DAPI (Invitrogen; 1:1000) for 1 h at room temperature. Remaining steps were performed as described (25, 26).

RNA Isolation, RT-PCR, and Gene Expression Assays

Total RNA was isolated from untreated or cytokine-stimulated MDSCs (26). Five hundred ng of RNA was used to reverse transcribe into cDNA and subjected to qRT-PCR. The abundance of mRNA was normalized to that of 18S or HPRT (hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase) and the data analyzed using the comparative Ct method to obtain relative quantitation values (26).

Immunoblotting

Thirty µg of cell lysate was separated by electrophoresis on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and probed with specific Abs (26).

ELISA and Multiplex Analysis of Cytokine Expression

Tumor supernatants, TRAMP tumor cell CM, and serum were collected and analyzed using a G-CSF ELISA kit (R&D Systems). Millipore mouse cytokine/chemokine panel LI (MPXMCYTO-70K) (Millipore, Billerica, MA) was used for detection of cytokines and chemokines. Expression levels of cytokines/chemokines were normalized to total protein levels.

Statistical Analyses

Graphpad Prism v6.01 was used for the graphs and for statistics. ANOVA test was performed. All results are shown as mean ± SD. A p value of < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

Myeloid-specific SOCS3 Loss Promotes Tumor Growth

We utilized a syngeneic tumor model of murine TRAMP C1 and C2 prostate cancer cells (32) inoculated into the flanks of C57BL/6 SOCS3fl/fl and SOCS3MyeKO mice. Tumor growth was significantly increased in SOCS3MyeKO mice compared with SOCS3fl/fl mice (Fig. 1A). Immunofluorescence staining demonstrates enhanced tumor infiltration of CD45+ hematopoietic-derived cells and Gr-1+ myeloid cells in SOCS3MyeKO mice at day 45 (Fig. 1B). The Gr-1+CD11b+ cell population was substantially increased in SOCS3MyeKO mice compared to SOCS3fl/fl mice (Fig. 1C), whereas the percentages of other cells such as macrophages (F4/80high, CD11b+), DCs (CD11b+, CD11c+), B cells (B220+) and T cells (CD3+) were largely unchanged (Fig. 1D). Associated with the increased frequency of Gr-1+CD11b+ cells in the tumor, there was a significant reduction in infiltrating CD8+ T cells in the tumors of SOCS3MyeKO mice (Fig. 1E). The percentage of Gr-1+CD11b+ cells was elevated in the spleens of SOCS3MyeKO mice compared to that of SOCS3fl/fl mice (Fig. S1A), although no changes in CD8+ T cells were observed in the spleens (Fig. S1B). Similar percentages of CD4+Foxp3+CD25+ regulatory T cells (Treg) were detected in tumors from SOCS3MyeKO and SOCS3fl/fl mice (Fig. S1C). To determine if the increased tumor growth observed in SOCS3MyeKO mice is due to enhanced MDSC function, depletion of Gr-1+ MDSCs with anti-Gr-1 neutralizing antibody in tumor-bearing mice was conducted. TRAMP-C1 cells were injected into the flanks of SOCS3fl/fl and SOCS3MyeKO mice, and anti-Gr-1 mAb or isotype control was administrated at day 24 (Fig. S1D). We observed reduced levels of MDSCs in the spleens of SOCS3MyeKO mice after treatment with neutralizing Gr-1 mAb (Fig. S1E). More importantly, tumor growth was significantly reduced after treatment with anti-Gr-1 mAb in SOCS3MyeKO mice (Fig. 1F). These results suggest a critical role -for Gr-1+ MDSCs in contributing to tumor growth in SOCS3MyeKO mice.

Figure 1. Myeloid-specific SOCS3 Loss Promotes Tumor Growth.

Figure 1

(A) SOCS3fl/fl (n=25) and SOCS3MyeKO (n=22) mice were inoculated s.c. with 3.0 × 106 TRAMP-C1 or -C2 cells. Tumor size is indicated as volume (mm3 ± SD), and was evaluated up to 45 days. (B) H&E staining of TRAMP-C1 tumors from mice at 45 days. Scale bar, 50 µm. Immunofluorescence staining of tumor infiltrating CD45+ or Gr-1+ cells, n = 3 for SOCS3fl/fl mice, n = 3 for SOCS3MyeKO mice. Scale bar, 45 µm. (C) Flow cytometry plot of Gr-1+CD11b+ cells from tumors of TRAMP-C1 mice (top), and quantification of tumor-infiltrating Gr-1+CD11b+ cells (bottom) (n = 7 – 8 for SOCS3fl/fl mice or SOCS3MyeKO mice). (D) SOCS3fl/fl (n=3) and SOCS3MyeKO (n=3) mice were inoculated s.c. with 3.0 × 106 TRAMP-C1 cells. After 45 days of inoculation, tumor infiltrating CD45+ cells were gated, and the percentage of the indicated cell subsets determined by flow cytometry. (E) Flow cytometry plot of CD3+ and CD8+ T cells (gated in boxes) from tumors of TRAMP-C1 mice (top), and quantification of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells (bottom) (n = 8 – 10 for SOCS3fl/fl mice or SOCS3MyeKO mice). (F) SOCS3fl/fl and SOCS3MyeKO mice were inoculated s.c with 3.0 × 106 TRAMP-C1 cells. At 24 days, mice were randomly assigned to receive anti-Gr-1 or isotype antibodies (100 µg per mouse) every two days for a total 9 treatments (n = 5 for SOCS3fl/fl mice, n = 5 for SOCS3MyeKO mice). Tumor size indicated as volume (mean mm3 ± SD) was evaluated at 41 days. *p<0.05 and **p<0.01.

Gr-1+CD11b+ Cells from Tumor-bearing Mice Suppress Antigen-specific T-cell Responses

Gr-1+CD11b+ cells from the tumors of TRAMP-C1 mice displayed multi-lobed nuclei (Fig. 2A). Gr-1 identifies the monocyte and neutrophil markers Ly6C and Ly6G, respectively. MDSCs consist of two major subsets of Ly6G+Ly6Clow granulocytic and Ly6GLy6Chi monocytic cells (33). Gr-1+CD11b+ cells from TRAMP-C1 tumors are a mixture of granulocytic and monocytic cells, with the majority of cells expressing Ly6G (Fig. 2B). Further, higher percentages of both granulocytic and monocytic MDSCs were detected in SOCS3MyeKO mice (Fig. 2B). We next examined the influence of SOCS3 on various MDSC effector functions, first testing the ability of Gr-1+CD11b+ cells isolated from tumors to suppress in vitro proliferation of OVA-specific CD8+ T cells. The immunosuppressive function of tumor-associated MDSCs isolated from SOCS3MyeKO mice was more potent than MDSCs from SOCS3fl/fl mice (Fig. 2C). MDSCs from the tumors of SOCS3MyeKO mice decreased IFNã production by T cells more potently (Fig. S2A) and produced higher levels of nitrite upon co-culture with OT-1 splenocytes (Fig. S2B) than MDSCs from SOCS3fl/fl mice. Gene expression analysis of MDSCs isolated from tumors was performed. Loss of SOCS3 increased expression of mediators of immune suppression, including Arginase 1 and S100A8, with a trend of increased iNOS and S100A9 (Fig. 2D). MDSCs from the spleens of SOCS3MyeKO mice inhibited T-cell proliferation more potently (Fig. S2C) and had significantly increased arginase activity compared to MDSCs from SOCS3fl/fl mice (Fig. S2D). Furthermore, Gr-1+CD11b+ cells isolated from the BM, spleens and tumors of SOCS3MyeKO mice had elevated STAT3 activation compared to cells from SOCS3fl/fl mice (Fig. 2E).

Figure 2. Gr-1+CD11b+ Cells from SOCS3MyeKO Tumor-Bearing Mice Suppress Antigen-specific T-cell Responses.

Figure 2

(A) Diff-Quick stain of cytospin preparation of CD45+Gr-1+CD11b+ cells from TRAMP-C1 tumors at 42 days. (B) Flow cytometric analysis of myeloid cells in tumors formed by TRAMP-C1 cells at 42 days. Numbers indicate the % of CD45+CD11b+Ly6G+ or CD45+CD11b+Ly6C+ cells. Data shown are representative of 3 experiments. (C) CD45+Gr-1+CD11b+ cells were isolated from TRAMP-C1 tumors by flow cytometry at 42 days, and antigen-specific suppression of CD8+ T cells evaluated in a co-culture assay. Splenocytes from OT-1 transgenic mice were cultured in the presence of increasing ratios of Gr-1+CD11b+ cells and stimulated with OVA-derived peptide. Proliferation of OVA-specific CD8+ T cells was evaluated by flow cytometric analysis of CFSE dilution after 72 h of co-culture. Data are mean ± SD; representative of 5 experiments. (D) Gene expression of CD45+Gr-1+CD11b+ cells from tumors of TRAMP-C1 mice by qRT-PCR at day 42. Data shown are representative of 3 experiments. (E) SOCS3fl/fl (n=3) and SOCS3MyeKO (n=3) mice were inoculated s.c. with 3.0 × 106 TRAMP-C1 cells. Thirty-one days after inoculation, intracellular staining for p-STAT3 was performed in Gr-1+CD11b+ cells from BM, spleens, and tumors. Numbers indicate the quantification of mean fluorescence intensity. *p<0.05.

Orthotopic Prostate Tumor Growth is Enhanced in SOCS3MyeKO Mice

We next investigated the functional importance of SOCS3 in myeloid cells in the prostate microenvironment. TRAMP-C2 cells represent more advanced prostate cancer than TRAMP-C1 cells, due to enhanced tumor growth and elevated expression of Ras and Myc (34). TRAMP-C2 cells were injected intraprostatically into SOCS3fl/fl and SOCS3MyeKO mice (30), and prostate weight compared amongst the two groups. Orthotopic growth of TRAMP-C2 cells was significantly increased in SOCS3MyeKO mice (Fig. 3A). H&E staining of TRAMP-C2 tumors in SOCS3fl/fl and SOCS3MyeKO mice showed poorly differentiated tumors compared to control prostate (Fig. 3B). Prostate tumors from SOCS3MyeKO mice have higher numbers of infiltrating CD45+ cells and Gr-1+ cells (Fig. 3B). Orthotopic TRAMP-C2 tumors in SOCS3MyeKO mice exhibited increased Gr-1+CD11b+ cell infiltration compared to SOCS3fl/fl mice (Fig. 3C), and a significant reduction in the percentage of infiltrating CD8+ T cells (Fig. 3D). Significantly higher levels of S100A8 and S100A9, inflammation- and cancer-promoting factors expressed by Gr-1+CD11b+ MDSCs (35), were detected in prostate tumors from SOCS3MyeKO mice compared with that from SOCS3fl/fl mice (Fig. 3E).

Figure 3. Orthotopic Prostate Tumor Growth is Enhanced in SOCS3MyeKO mice.

Figure 3

(A) 1 × 106 TRAMP-C2 cells were injected into the prostates of SOCS3fl/fl (n=6) and SOCS3MyeKO (n=6) mice. Tumor weight was evaluated at 30 days. (B) H&E staining of prostate at 30 days. Scale bar, 1 mm. Immunofluorescence staining of tumor-infiltrating CD45+ or Gr-1+ cells at day 30. Scale bar, 45 µm. Prostate isolated from SOCS3fl/fl mice after intraprostatic injection of PBS was used as a control. Control mice (n = 2); SOCS3fl/fl mice (n = 4); SOCS3MyeKO mice (n = 4). (C, D) Quantification of flow cytometric analyses of prostate tumor-infiltrating Gr-1+CD11b+ cells (C) and CD8+ T cells (D) (n = 3 per group). (E) Expression of indicated genes from TRAMP-C2 prostate tumors was evaluated by qRT-PCR at day 30 post implantation. Data are mean ± SD, representative of 2 experiments. *p<0.05.

Loss of SOCS3 Promotes Proliferation of Gr-1+CD11b+ Cells

TRAMP tumor-bearing mice developed splenomegaly compared to naïve mice, and SOCS3MyeKO mice showed a significant increase in spleen size and weight compared to SOCS3fl/fl mice (Fig. 4A). Perturbed myelopoiesis and spleen hematopoiesis (36) may account for the accumulation of Gr-1+CD11b+ cells in tumors and increased spleen size. EdU cell proliferation assays were performed to address the role of SOCS3 on myeloid cell proliferation. We observed no differences in myelopoiesis (Fig. S3A), spleen size (Fig. S3B) and BM myeloid cell proliferation (Fig. S3C) between naïve SOCS3fl/fl and SOCS3MyeKO mice. Gr-1+CD11b+ cells from the spleens of naïve SOCS3fl/fl mice had ∼6.4% proliferating cells, and both TRAMP-C1 tumor-bearing SOCS3fl/fl and SOCS3MyeKO mice showed increased proliferating cells compared with naïve mice (Fig. 4B). Additionally, the percentage of proliferating Gr-1+CD11b+ cells from the spleens of SOCS3MyeKO mice was higher than that of SOCS3fl/fl mice. Similarly, Gr-1HighCD11b+ cells and Gr-1IntCD11b+ cells from the BM of TRAMP-C1 tumor-bearing SOCS3MyeKO mice exhibited an enhanced proliferation rate (Fig. 4C). TRAMP tumor development was associated with a 2 μ 3 fold increase in circulating white blood cells (WBC) in SOCS3MyeKO mice (Fig. 4D), due to a 3 – 5 fold increase in granulocytes (Fig. 4E). This suggests that factors secreted by the tumor may increase the mobility of BM progenitor cells to enter the bloodstream.

Figure 4. Loss of SOCS3 Promotes Proliferation of Gr-1+CD11b+ Cells.

Figure 4

(A) TRAMP-C1 tumor-bearing SOCS3MyeKO mice exhibit splenomegaly as indicated by spleen size (n=5 for SOCS3fl/fl mice, n=6 for SOCS3MyeKO mice). Image of spleens (top) and summary of spleen weight (bottom) are shown. (B) Naïve SOCS3fl/fl mice and TRAMP-C1 tumor-bearing SOCS3fl/fl and SOCS3MyeKO mice were injected i.p. with 100 µg of EdU, and spleens were harvested 20 h after injection. Spleen cells were stained for Gr-1+ and CD11b+, then detected by flow cytometry for EdU-positive cells. Flow plots are shown for one mouse in each category. (C) BM cells were stained for Gr-1+ and CD11b+, then detected by flow cytometry for EdU-positive cells. Number in each quadrant expressed as Gr-1High and Gr-1Int percentage of total cells (left), and histogram of EdU plot is shown (right), with numbers expressed as percentage of total Gr-1+CD11b+ cells. Data shown are representative of 2 experiments; Naïve mice (n = 2); SOCS3fl/fl mice (n = 4); SOCS3MyeKO mice (n = 4). (D, E) Blood was obtained by cheek bleeding puncture from TRAMP-C1 tumor-bearing mice 45 days after inoculation, and analyzed on the HEMAVET®950 hematology analyzer. White blood cell (WBC) (103/µl) (D), and granulocyte counts (103/µl) (E) are shown. *p<0.05 and **p<0.01.

Next, we cultured BM cells from SOCS3fl/fl and SOCS3MyeKO mice in the absence or presence of TRAMP conditioned media (CM) for 4 days, and total numbers of Gr-1+CD11b+ cells were determined by flow cytometry. The absolute number of Gr-1+CD11b+ cells generated from SOCS3MyeKO mice was ∼ 2-fold higher than SOCS3fl/fl mice (Fig. S3D). Cell cycle analysis was performed, and results indicate increased numbers of SOCS3fl/fl BM cells in S and M phase compared with that of the SOCS3fl/fl BM cells (Fig. S3E). These results indicate that factors from the tumor microenvironment contribute to the differentiation and proliferation of Gr-1+CD11b+ cells, and that SOCS3 plays a critical role in regulating myeloid cell proliferative responses to these factors.

Absence of SOCS3 Enhances STAT3 Activation and BM Differentiation into Gr-1+CD11b+ MDSCs

We utilized CM from TRAMP cells to assess functional effects on MDSCs. TRAMP CM, but not control medium, promoted BM cells to differentiate into Gr-1+CD11b+ cells, with higher percentages detected in SOCS3MyeKO mice (Fig. 5A). In addition, Gr-1+CD11b+ cells from SOCS3MyeKO mice incubated in TRAMP CM exhibited a greater capacity to suppress antigen-specific T-cell proliferation (Fig. 5B) and IFNã production (Fig. 5C) than did cells from SOCS3fl/fl mice. Gr-1+CD11b+ cells lacking SOCS3 also produced elevated levels of nitrite (Fig. 5D) and had increased arginase activity (Fig. 5E). Cells from SOCS3MyeKO mice showed enhanced and prolonged STAT3 activation in the presence of TRAMP CM compared with that in SOCS3fl/fl mice (Fig. 5F). Loss of SOCS3 increased expression of Arginase 1, iNOS, S100A8, S100A9 and IDO1 (37) by BM-derived Gr-1+CD11b+ cells incubated with TRAMP CM (Fig. 5G). TRAMP CM cultured Gr-1+CD11b+ cells had low expression of MHC class II, with SOCS3MyeKO cells expressing less MHC class II compared to that expressed by SOCS3fl/fl cells (Fig. 5H), suggesting that loss of SOCS3 maintains MDSCs in an undifferentiated state. The majority of Gr-1+CD11b+ cells generated in the presence of TRAMP CM express Ly6G (Fig. 5I). These results demonstrate that prostate tumor cells secrete factors that drive the generation of Gr-1+CD11b+ cells from hematopoietic progenitor cells of the BM, and this effect is amplified in the absence of SOCS3.

Figure 5. Absence of SOCS3 Enhances STAT3 Activation and BM Differentiation into Gr-1+CD11b+ MDSCs.

Figure 5

(A) BM cells from SOCS3fl/fl and SOCS3MyeKO mice were cultured in TRAMP-C1 CM (100% volume), and Gr-1+CD11b+ cells analyzed by flow cytometry at day 4. Numbers are expressed as percentage of total CD45+ cells. (B) BM-derived cells incubated with TRAMP-C1 CM for 4 days were co-cultured with CFSE (0.5 µM) labeled OT-1 splenocytes in the presence of OVA-derived peptide. Proliferation of CD8+ T cells was evaluated by flow cytometric analysis of CFSE dilution after 48 h of co-culture. Data are mean ± SD; representative of 3 experiments. (C) BM-derived cells incubated with TRAMP CM (100% volume) for 4 days were co-cultured with OT-1 splenocytes in the presence of OVA-derived peptide. Levels of IFNã in the supernatant of co-cultured BM-derived Gr-1+CD11b+ cells with OT-1 splenocytes (1:4 ratio) were measured by ELISA. Data are representative of 3 experiments. (D) Nitrite concentration in supernatant from co-cultured cells (1:4 ratio) was measured by Griess reaction. Data shown are representative of 3 experiments. (E) Gr-1+CD11b+ cells were sorted from cultured BM-derived cells treated with TRAMP-C1 CM for 4 days, and arginase activity was measured in lysates from sorted cells. Assay was performed in triplicate, data are the mean ± SD. (F) BM-derived cells were treated with TRAMP-C1 CM (100% volume) for the indicated times, and immunoblotting performed with the indicated antibodies. Data shown are representative of 4 experiments. (G) BM cells from SOCS3fl/fl and SOCS3MyeKO mice were treated with TRAMP-C1 CM (100% volume) for 4 h, and expression of indicated genes evaluated by qRT-PCR. (H) Expression of MHC class II by Gr-1+CD11b+ cells was detected by flow cytometry after 4 days of in vitro culture with TRAMP-C1 CM. Mature dendritic cells generated by BM cells cultured in medium containing GM-CSF (10 ng/ml) for 7 days were used as a positive control, and Rat IgG2b was used as isotype control. (I) BM cells from SOCS3fl/fl and SOCS3MyeKO mice were cultured in the presence of TRAMP-C1 CM and analyzed by flow cytometry at day 4. Numbers are expressed as percentage of total CD45+CD11b+ myeloid cells. Data are mean ± SD; representative of 3 experiments. *p<0.05 and **p<0.01.

G-CSF Induces the Differentiation of BM Precursors into Functional MDSCs in a STAT3-dependent Manner

We next examined potential prostate tumor-derived soluble factors that may contribute to the generation of Gr-1+CD11b+ cells. Expression of G-CSF in the serum of naïve and TRAMP tumor-bearing mice was examined, and elevated levels of G-CSF were detected from mice with orthotopic or s.c. TRAMP tumors (Fig. S4A). Prostate tissues from orthotopic tumor-bearing mice and flank tumor tissue were evaluated for G-CSF concentrations. Higher amounts of G-CSF were detected in TRAMP tumor-bearing mice compared to that in tissue from naïve mice (Fig. 6A), although the levels of G-CSF were not different between tumor-bearing SOCS3MyeKO and SOCS3fl/fl mice. CM from TRAMP cells also contained G-CSF (Fig. 6A). The expression of G-CSF was validated at the mRNA level (Fig. S4B). Enhanced and prolonged activation of STAT3 was observed in G-CSF−treated BM cells from SOCS3MyeKO mice (Fig. 6B), which was validated by flow cytometry (Fig. 6C). G-CSF also activated STAT5 in Gr-1+CD11b+ cells, but SOCS3 deficiency did not affect this response (Fig. 6C). SOCS3 mRNA expression was induced by G-CSF treatment of cells from SOCS3fl/fl mice, but not in cells from SOCS3MyeKO mice (Fig. 6D). Inclusion of G-CSF in BM cultures promoted differentiation into Gr-1+CD11b+ cells, with SOCS3MyeKO cells having higher levels (Fig. 6E, left). SOCS3 overexpression was utilized to validate the negative regulatory role of SOCS3 in G-CSF promotion of MDSCs (29). Overexpression of SOCS3 in BM cells from SOCS3fl/fl and SOCS3MyeKO mice diminished the generation of Gr-1+CD11b+ cells in response to G-CSF (Fig. 6E, right). To substantiate the involvement of STAT3 in MDSC differentiation, JAK and STAT3 inhibitors were tested. A significant reduction in Gr-1+CD11b+ cells in the presence of the pan-JAK inhibitor P6 (38) or the STAT3 inhibitor Stattic (39) was observed (Fig. 6F). These results indicate that SOCS3 negatively regulates G-CSF−induced generation of Gr-1+CD11b+ cells by inhibiting JAK/STAT3 activation. In the presence of G-CSF, loss of SOCS3 increased expression of Arginase 1, iNOS, S100A8, S100A9 and IDO1 (Fig. 6G). Furthermore, Gr-1+CD11b+ cells from SOCS3MyeKO mice incubated in G-CSF exhibited a greater capacity to suppress T-cell proliferation (Fig. 6H), and had increased arginase activity compared to Gr-1+CD11b+ cells from SOCS3fl/fl mice (Fig. 6I). Thus, we identify G-CSF as an important factor in the development of Gr-1+CD11b+ MDSCs via STAT3 activation, which is regulated by SOCS3.

Figure 6. G-CSF Induces the Differentiation of BM Precursors into Functional MDSCs in a STAT3-dependent Manner.

Figure 6

(A) Supernatant of prostate tumors obtained from mice with intraprostatic injection of TRAMP-C2 cells (at day 30), and flank tumors from TRAMP-C1 or -C2 tumor-bearing mice (at day 42), as well as TRAMP-C1 or -C2 tumor cell CM were analyzed for G-CSF levels by ELISA. Data are mean ± SD; representative of 3 experiments. (B) BM-derived cells were treated with G-CSF (10 ng/ml) for the indicated times and immunoblotting performed with the indicated antibodies. Data shown are representative of 4 experiments. (C) BM-derived cells were incubated in the absence or presence of G-CSF (10 ng/ml) for 2 h, then intracellular staining for p-STAT3 or p-STAT5 was performed. Data shown are representative of 2 experiments. (D) SOCS3 mRNA expression from cultured BM-derived cells treated with G-CSF (10 ng/ml) for the indicated times was evaluated by qRT-PCR. Data are mean ± SD; representative of 2 experiments. (E) BM cells from SOCS3fl/fl and SOCS3MyeKO mice were cultured in G-CSF (20 ng/ml), G-CSF (20 ng/ml) with Lentivirus expressing GFP or Lentivirus expressing SOCS3. Gr-1+CD11b+ cells were analyzed by flow cytometry at day 4. Data shown are representative of 5 experiments. (F) BM cells from SOCS3fl/fl and SOCS3MyeKO mice were cultured in G-CSF (20 ng/ml). Vehicle (DMSO), P6 (1 µM), or Stattic (1 µM) were added to the cultures at days 0 and 2, and Gr-1+CD11b+ cells analyzed by flow cytometry at day 4. Data shown are representative of 2 experiments. (G) BM cells from SOCS3fl/fl and SOCS3MyeKO mice were treated with G-CSF (10 ng/ml) for 4 h, and expression of indicated genes evaluated by qRT-PCR. Data are mean ± SD; representative of 2 experiments. (H) BM cells cultured for 4 days with G-CSF (20 ng/ml) were co-cultured with (0.5 µM) CFSE-labeled OT-1 splenocytes in the presence of OVA peptide. Proliferation of CD8+ T cells was evaluated by flow cytometric analysis of CFSE dilution after 48 h of co-culture. Numbers indicates the ratio of OT-1 splenocytes:MDSCs. Data shown are representative of 3 experiments. (I) Gr-1+CD11b+ cells were sorted from cultured BM-derived cells, then treated with G-CSF (10 ng/ml) for 4 h. Arginase activity was measured in lysates from sorted cells. Assay was performed in triplicate, data are the mean ± SD. *p<0.05, **p<0.01.

G-CSF Neutralization Limits Gr-1+CD11b+ Cell Proliferation and Tumor Growth

BM cells isolated from SOCS3fl/fl and SOCS3MyeKO mice were cultured in the presence of TRAMP CM or G-CSF. Flow cytometric analysis demonstrates that addition of anti-G-CSF Ab, but not isotype IgG, inhibits generation of Gr-1+CD11b+ cells (Fig. S5A). Neutralization of G-CSF partially inhibited BM cell proliferation in the presence of TRAMP CM, and abolished proliferation induced by G-CSF (Fig. 7A).

Figure 7. G-CSF Neutralization Limits Gr-1+CD11b+ Cell Proliferation In Vitro and Tumor Growth In Vivo.

Figure 7

(A) BM cells from SOCS3fl/fl and SOCS3MyeKO mice were labeled with CFSE, then cultured in the presence of TRAMP CM or G-CSF (10 ng/ml) with the indicated antibodies. Proliferation of Gr-1+CD11b+ cells was evaluated by flow cytometric analysis of CFSE dilution after 4 days. Numbers are expressed as percentage proliferating cells of total Gr-1+CD11b+ cells (Red, SOCS3fl/fl; Black, SOCS3MyeKO). (B) SOCS3fl/fl and SOCS3MyeKO mice were inoculated s.c with 3.0 × 106 TRAMP-C1 cells. Mice were randomly assigned to receive anti-G-CSF or isotype antibodies (10 µg per mouse). Black arrows indicate Ab administration (n = 6 for SOCS3fl/fl mice, n = 6 for SOCS3MyeKO mice). Tumor size indicated as volume (mean mm3 ± SD) was evaluated up to 39 days. (C) SOCS3fl/fl and SOCS3MyeKO mice were inoculated s.c. with 3.0 × 106 TRAMP-C1 cells. After 39 days, flank tumors were collected and weighed. Data expressed as mean ± SD. (D, E) Quantification of flow cytometric analyses of tumor-infiltrating (D) and spleen (E) Gr-1+CD11b+ cells (n=3 per group). *p<0.05 and **p<0.01. (F) Schematic model. Tumor cell-secreted G-CSF induces activation of the JAK/STAT3 pathway in myeloid cells, which leads to induction of tumor promoting genes, and to SOCS3 expression. SOCS3 is a feedback inhibitor of G-CSF-induced STAT3 activation. In the absence of SOCS3, MDSCs are hyper-responsive to tumor-produced G-CSF, aberrantly activate STAT3, and express enhanced levels of Arginase 1, iNOS and S100A8/9. Elevated levels of MDSCs suppress antitumor immune responses in the tumor microenvironment, in part by inhibiting activity of CD8+ T cells, and eventually promote tumor growth.

The contribution of G-CSF to tumor growth was next assessed. TRAMP-C1 cells were injected into the flanks of SOCS3fl/fl and SOCS3MyeKO mice, and anti-G-CSF mAb or isotype control was administrated at day 22 (Fig. 7B). In both SOCS3fl/fl and SOCS3MyeKO mice, tumor volume (Fig. 7B), weight (Fig. 7C) and serum G-CSF levels (Fig. S5B) were significantly reduced after treatment with anti-G-CSF mAb. Circulating WBC (Fig. S5C) and granulocytes (Fig. S5D) were also decreased after treatment with neutralizing G-CSF mAb in SOCS3MyeKO mice. Moreover, infiltration of MDSCs in tumors was significantly reduced after treatment with neutralizing G-CSF mAb (Fig. 7D), as were levels of MDSCs in the spleens of SOCS3MyeKO mice, but not in SOCS3fl/fl mice (Fig. 7E). These data highlight the importance of myeloid SOCS3 in regulating prostate tumor growth in response to G-CSF. To exclude a direct action of anti-G-CSF Ab on TRAMP-C1 tumor cells, G-CSF receptor (G-CSFR) expression was assessed. We observed high levels of G-CSFR expression on spleen or tumor Gr-1+ cells compared with TRAMP-C1 tumor cells and non-myeloid CD11b cells from tumor-bearing mice (Fig. S5E).

DISCUSSION

We demonstrate that SOCS3 expression in myeloid cells is an important determinant of tumor growth, indicating a critical influence of the tumor microenvironment in cancer progression. The loss of SOCS3 in myeloid cells promotes the differentiation of BM-derived progenitor cells into Gr-1+CD11b+ MDSCs, and enhances the immunosuppressive functions of these cells. Importantly, STAT3 activation is essential for this process. Tumor-derived G-CSF is crucial for the mobilization and recruitment of Gr-1+CD11b+ MDSCs to tumors, where they decrease the presence of CD8+ T cells. Neutralization of G-CSF is effective in limiting the differentiation and functionality of MDSCs, which in vivo manifests as restricted tumor growth. These findings establish a circuitry between MDSCs, tumor cells and G-CSF in the tumor microenvironment; G-CSF secreted by tumor cells promotes the recruitment and differentiation of MDSCs, which is dependent on STAT3 activation in MDSCs. In the absence of SOCS3, this response and circuitry is amplified (Fig. 7F). These results support a role for SOCS3 in repressing MDSC differentiation, which ultimately relieves immunosuppression in the prostate tumor microenvironment.

Persistent STAT3 activation is associated with poor prognosis in many cancer types, including prostate cancer patients (40). Loss of the androgen receptor (AR) leads to the development of prostate cancer stem cells, which requires STAT3 activation (41). Stem-like cells from patients with prostate cancer secrete high levels of IL6 and exhibit hyperactivation of STAT3 (42). STAT3 activation in cells of the hematopoietic lineage is also associated with creating a tumor microenvironment conducive to tumor growth. This is especially true for MDSCs, which rely on STAT3 for differentiation and functionality. Ablation of STAT3 in multiple lineages of immune cells (neutrophils, NK cells, DCs) enhanced their antitumor activity (39). While MDSCs were not directly examined, heightened activation of STAT3 in MDSCs, as shown by our study, may contribute to tumor immune tolerance. MDSCs lacking SOCS3 with STAT3 hyperactivation have potent immunosuppressive capabilities such as inhibition of antigen-specific CD8+ T-cell proliferation and IFNγ production, and enhanced nitrite production and arginase activity. Also, SOCS3-deficient MDSCs expressed MHC Class II at lower levels than SOCS3 wild-type MDSCs, suggestive of an immature suppressive phenotype. Circulating MDSCs from prostate cancer patients displayed reduced expression of HLA-DR compared to that in age-matched controls, and had more potent ability to suppress T-cell proliferation (43). It will be informative to examine SOCS3 expression and STAT3 activation status in prostate tumor cells, prostate stem cells and prostate tumor-associated MDSCs to determine the functional impact of SOCS3/STAT3 in patients with prostate cancer. Nonetheless, our findings clearly demonstrate the importance of SOCS3 in restricting MDSC-mediated antitumor immunity.

Using TRAMP C1/C2 cell lines in immune competent mice, elevated levels of MDSCs were detected in the tumors of SOCS3MyeKO mice compared to that in SOCS3fl/fl mice, in both flank and orthotopic models. This was associated with a decrease of CD8+ T cells in the tumors, which supports the notion that MDSCs interfere with T-cell activation and proliferation. MDSCs also selectively expand Foxp3+CD25+ Tregs, which promote tumor growth by a variety of mechanisms (44). In our studies, Foxp3+ Tregs were present at comparable levels in tumors from both SOCS3MyeKO and SOCS3fl/fl mice, thus, Tregs may not have a prominent role in the TRAMP prostate cancer model (45).

G-CSF plays a crucial role in hematopoiesis by stimulating the proliferation, differentiation and survival of myeloid progenitor cells, particularly cells within the granulocytic lineage (28). JAK1, JAK2 and TYK2 are recruited to the G-CSF receptor upon stimulation with G-CSF, and then in turn activate STAT1, STAT3 and STAT5, of which STAT3 is the most important. SOCS3 is induced by G-CSF in myeloid cells, and serves as a negative regulator of G-CSF-induced cellular responses by binding to the G-CSF receptor (28, 46). G-CSF is one of a number of soluble mediators that promote the expansion and migration of MDSCs from the bone marrow to tumors. While the levels of G-CSF were comparable in SOCS3MyeKO and SOCS3fl/fl tumor-bearing mice, SOCS3MyeKO BM-derived cells are hyper-responsive to G-CSF, as documented by increased duration and intensity of G-CSF-induced STAT3 phosphorylation, which led to MDSC differentiation at a greater percentage than cells from SOCS3fl/fl mice. In addition, G-CSF-induced MDSCs from SOCS3MyeKO tumor-bearing mice exhibited a greater capacity to suppress antigen-specific T-cell proliferation. Our in vivo findings demonstrate that treatment of tumor-bearing mice with neutralizing G-CSF antibody reduced circulating granulocytic cells as well as infiltration of MDSCs in tumors. These findings highlight the critical role of tumor-derived G-CSF in MDSC development, and the importance of SOCS3 as an essential negative regulator of this process. SOCS3 expression in MDSCs negatively regulates the expression of soluble mediators such as S100A8 and S100A9 and products of iNOS and arginase 1 that support an immunosuppressive milieu in tumors. In the absence of SOCS3, MDSCs are hyper-responsive to tumor-produced cytokines such as G-CSF, and aberrantly activate STAT3, which in turn contributes to chronic cancer-related inflammation and suppression of antitumor immune responses.

Clinical information regarding SOCS3 expression in prostate cancer is inconclusive at this time. Pierconti and colleagues (9) demonstrated that methylation of the SOCS3 promoter was significantly associated with intermediate-high grade Gleason score and with an unfavorable outcome. In benign prostate hyperplasia and normal controls, the SOCS3 promoter was unmethylated. Analysis of the Oncomine database demonstrates that SOCS3 mRNA expression is significantly lower in prostate carcinoma compared to prostate cancer precursor (Luo dataset), but the Tomlins dataset shows the opposite results (https://www.oncomine.org/resource/main.html#a%3A985%3Bd%3A46%3Bdso%3AgeneOverex%3Bdt%3ApredefinedClass%3Bec%3A%5B2%5D%3Bepv%3A150001.151078%2C2937%2C3508%3Bet%3Aover%3Bf%3A33306%3Bg%3A9021%3Bgt%3Aboxplot%3Bp%3A200000762%3Bpg%3A1%3Bpvf%3A3483%2C36061%2C150003%2C150004%3Bscr%3Adatasets%3Bss%3Aanalysis%3Bv%3A18). Data from cBioPortal (Prostate Adenocarcinoma MSKCC) indicates that prostate cancer patients with SOCS3 mRNA overexpression trend towards a longer disease-free time than patients with “normal” levels of SOCS3 mRNA (http://www.cbioportal.org/publicportal/index.do?cancer_study_id=prad_mskcc&genetic_profile_ids_PROFILE_MUTATION_EXTENDED=prad_mskcc_mutations&genetic_profile_ids_PROFILE_COPY_NUMBER_ALTERATION=prad_mskcc_cna&genetic_profile_ids_PROFILE_MRNA_EXPRESSION=prad_mskcc_mrna_zbynorm&Z_SCORE_THRESHOLD=2.0&data_priority=0&case_set_id=prad_mskcc_complete&case_ids=&gene_set_choice=user-defined-list&gene_list=SOCS3&clinical_param_selection=null&tab_index=tab_visualize&Action=Submit). Thus, there is clearly dysregulation of SOCS3 gene expression in patients with prostate cancer, but the functional and clinical relevance is still under investigation. Nonetheless, it is clear that a variety of mechanisms, including SOCS3 dysregulation and abundant IL6 production, do contribute to hyperactivation of JAK/STAT pathway in animal models of prostate cancer and in prostate cancer patients (4, 42, 47). Inhibitors of IL6, JAKs and STAT3 are being considered in the context of prostate cancer (4, 47), and have already proven beneficial in animal models (42). Furthermore, peptides that mimic the SOCS Kinase Inhibitory Region (KIR), which is responsible for binding to JAKs and suppressing downstream STAT3 activation (48), may prove beneficial in prostate cancer.

These studies not only highlight the significance of the STAT3/SOCS3 pathway in regulating the differentiation and function of MDSCs in cancer, but also identify this intricate protein network as important therapeutic targets to eliminate MDSC-mediated immunosuppression. This is especially important in light of the recent finding that MDSCs are responsible for resistance to immune check-point inhibitor, and that elimination of MDSCs led to cures of experimental, metastatic tumors (49).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The assistance of the UAB Comprehensive Arthritis, Musculoskeletal, and Autoimmunity Center Comprehensive Flow Cytometry Core (P30 AR48311) is gratefully acknowledged.

Financial Support: This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health grants CA158534 (ENB), CA132077 (SP) and CA133737 (SP), American Cancer Society grants RSG-11-259-01-CSM (DRH) and IRG-60-001-53 (JSD), METAvivorResearch and Support, Inc. (DRH) and a grant from the American Brain Tumor Association in honor of Paul Fabbri (BCM).

Footnotes

The authors disclose no potential conflicts of interest.

Author contributions: H.Y., J.S.D., E.N.B., and H.Q. designed research; H.Y., Y.L., B.C.M, and H.Q. performed research; H.Y., E.N.B., and H.Q. analyzed data; and H.Y., J.S.D., D.R.H., S.P., E.N.B., and H.Q. wrote the manuscript.

REFERENCES

  • 1.O’Shea JJ, Plenge R. JAK and STAT signaling molecules in immunoregulation and immune-mediated disease. Immunity. 2012;36:542–550. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.03.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Brantley EC, Benveniste EN. Signal transducer and activator of transcription-3: a molecular hub for signaling pathways in gliomas. Mol Cancer Res. 2008;6:675–684. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-07-2180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yu H, Pardoll D, Jove R. STATs in cancer inflammation and immunity: a leading role for STAT3. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9:798–809. doi: 10.1038/nrc2734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Guo Y, Xu F, Lu T, Duan Z, Zhang Z. Interleukin-6 signaling pathway in targeted therapy for cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2012;38:904–910. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yoshimura A, Naka T, Kubo M. SOCS proteins, cytokine signalling and immune regulation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7:454–465. doi: 10.1038/nri2093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Li Y, de Haar C, Peppelenbosch MP, van der Woude CJ. SOCS3 in immune regulation of inflammatory bowel disease and inflammatory bowel disease-related cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2012;23:127–138. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2012.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Babon JJ, Kershaw NJ, Murphy JM, Varghese LN, Laktyushin A, Young SN, et al. Suppression of cytokine signaling by SOCS3: characterization of the mode of inhibition and the basis of its specificity. Immunity. 2012;36:239–250. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.12.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Inagaki-Ohara K, Kondo T, Ito M, Yoshimura A. SOCS, inflammation, and cancer. Jakstat. 2013;2:e24053. doi: 10.4161/jkst.24053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pierconti F, Martini M, Pinto F, Cenci T, Capodimonti S, Calarco A, et al. Epigenetic silencing of SOCS3 identifies a subset of prostate cancer with an aggressive behavior. Prostate. 2011;71:318–325. doi: 10.1002/pros.21245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Calarco A, Pinto F, Pierconti F, Sacco E, Marrucci E, Totaro A, et al. Role of SOCS3 evaluated by immunohistochemical analysis in a cohort of patients affected by prostate cancer: preliminary results. Urologia. 2012;79(Suppl 19):4–8. doi: 10.5301/RU.2012.9392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Puhr M, Santer FR, Neuwirt H, Susani M, Nemeth JA, Hobisch A, et al. Down-regulation of suppressor of cytokine signaling-3 causes prostate cancer cell death through activation of the extrinsic and intrinsic apoptosis pathways. Cancer Res. 2009;69:7375–7384. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kneitz B, Krebs M, Kalogirou C, Schubert M, Joniau S, van Poppel H, et al. Survival in patients with high-risk prostate cancer is predicted by miR-221, which regulates proliferation, apoptosis, and invasion of prostate cancer cells by inhibiting IRF2 and SOCS3. Cancer Res. 2014;74:2591–2603. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-1606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gabrilovich DI, Ostrand-Rosenberg S, Bronte V. Coordinated regulation of myeloid cells by tumours. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12:253–268. doi: 10.1038/nri3175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Khaled YS, Ammori BJ, Elkord E. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in cancer: recent progress and prospects. Immunol Cell Biol. 2013;91:493–502. doi: 10.1038/icb.2013.29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Talmadge JE, Gabrilovich DI. History of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13:739–752. doi: 10.1038/nrc3581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mauti LA, Le Bitoux MA, Baumer K, Stehle JC, Golshayan D, Provero P, et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells are implicated in regulating permissiveness for tumor metastasis during mouse gestation. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:2794–2807. doi: 10.1172/JCI41936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Murdoch C, Muthana M, Coffelt SB, Lewis CE. The role of myeloid cells in the promotion of tumour angiogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:618–631. doi: 10.1038/nrc2444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Vanneman M, Dranoff G. Combining immunotherapy and targeted therapies in cancer treatment. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12:237–251. doi: 10.1038/nrc3237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Shojaei F, Wu X, Qu X, Kowanetz M, Yu L, Tan M, et al. G-CSF-initiated myeloid cell mobilization and angiogenesis mediate tumor refractoriness to anti-VEGF therapy in mouse models. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:6742–6747. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0902280106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Waight JD, Hu Q, Miller A, Liu S, Abrams SI. Tumor-derived G-CSF facilitates neoplastic growth through a granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cell-dependent mechanism. PLoS One. 2011;6:e27690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bayne LJ, Beatty GL, Jhala N, Clark CE, Rhim AD, Stanger BZ, et al. Tumor-derived granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor regulates myeloid inflammation and T cell immunity in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Cell. 2012;21:822–835. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.04.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhao X, Rong L, Zhao X, Li X, Liu X, Deng J, et al. TNF signaling drives myeloid-derived suppressor cell accumulation. J Clin Invest. 2012;122:4094–4104. doi: 10.1172/JCI64115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cheng P, Corzo CA, Luetteke N, Yu B, Nagaraj S, Bui MM, et al. Inhibition of dendritic cell differentiation and accumulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in cancer is regulated by S100A9 protein. J Exp Med. 2008;205:2235–2249. doi: 10.1084/jem.20080132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Waight JD, Netherby C, Hensen ML, Miller A, Hu Q, Liu S, et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cell development is regulated by a STAT/IRF-8 axis. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:4464–4478. doi: 10.1172/JCI68189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Qin H, Holdbrooks AT, Liu Y, Reynolds SL, Yanagisawa LL, Benveniste EN. SOCS3 deficiency promotes M1 macrophage polarization and inflammation. J Immunol. 2012;189:3439–3448. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1201168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Qin H, Yeh W-I, De Sarno P, Holdbrooks AT, Liu Y, Muldowney MT, et al. Signal transducer and activator of transcription-3/suppressor of cytokine signaling-3 (STAT3/SOCS3) axis in myeloid cells regulates neuroinflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:5004–5009. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117218109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rodriguez PC, Quiceno DG, Zabaleta J, Ortiz B, Zea AH, Piazuelo MB, et al. Arginase I production in the tumor microenvironment by mature myeloid cells inhibits T-cell receptor expression and antigen-specific T-cell responses. Cancer Res. 2004;64:5839–5849. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Croker BA, Metcalf D, Robb L, Wei W, Mifsud S, DiRago L, et al. SOCS3 is a critical physiological negative regulator of G-CSF signaling and emergency granulopoiesis. Immunity. 2004;20:153–165. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(04)00022-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Park KW, Nozell SE, Benveniste EN. Protective role of STAT3 in NMDA and glutamate-induced neuronal death: negative regulatory effect of SOCS3. PLoS One. 2012;7:e50874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gurusamy D, Gray JK, Pathrose P, Kulkarni RM, Finkleman FD, Waltz SE. Myeloid-specific expression of Ron receptor kinase promotes prostate tumor growth. Cancer Res. 2013;73:1752–1763. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-2474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Liu Y, Holdbrooks AT, De Sarno P, Rowse AL, Yanagisawa LL, McFarland BC, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of suppressing the JAK/STAT pathway in multiple models of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Immunol. 2014;192:59–72. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1301513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Greenberg NM, DeMayo F, Finegold MJ, Medina D, Tilley WD, Aspinall JO, et al. Prostate cancer in a transgenic mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:3439–3443. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.8.3439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Youn JI, Nagaraj S, Collazo M, Gabrilovich DI. Subsets of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in tumor-bearing mice. J Immunol. 2008;181:5791–5802. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.8.5791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Isayeva T, Chanda D, Kallman L, Eltoum IE, Ponnazhagan S. Effects of sustained antiangiogenic therapy in multistage prostate cancer in TRAMP model. Cancer Res. 2007;67:5789–5797. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Acharyya S, Oskarsson T, Vanharanta S, Malladi S, Kim J, Morris PG, et al. A CXCL1 paracrine network links cancer chemoresistance and metastasis. Cell. 2012;150:165–178. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sio A, Chehal MK, Tsai K, Fan X, Roberts ME, Nelson BH, et al. Dysregulated hematopoiesis caused by mammary cancer is associated with epigenetic changes and hox gene expression in hematopoietic cells. Cancer Res. 2013;73:5892–5904. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Smith C, Chang MY, Parker KH, Beury DW, DuHadaway JB, Flick HE, et al. IDO is a nodal pathogenic driver of lung cancer and metastasis development. Cancer Discov. 2012;2:722–735. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Meares GP, Liu Y, Rajbhandari R, Qin H, Nozell SE, Mobley JA, et al. PERK dependent activation of JAK1 and STAT3 contributes to ER stress induced inflammation. Mol Cell Biol. 2014;34:3911–3925. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00980-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Vasquez-Dunddel D, Pan F, Zeng Q, Gorbounov M, Albesiano E, Fu J, et al. STAT3 regulates arginase-I in myeloid-derived suppressor cells from cancer patients. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:1580–1589. doi: 10.1172/JCI60083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mora LB, Buettner R, Seigne J, Diaz J, Ahmad N, Garcia R, et al. Constitutive activation of STAT3 in human prostate tumors and cell lines: direct inhibition of STAT3 signaling induces apoptosis of prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2002;62:6659–6666. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Schroeder A, Herrmann A, Cherryholmes G, Kowolik C, Buettner R, Pal S, et al. Loss of androgen receptor expression promotes a stem-like cell phenotype in prostate cancer through STAT3 signaling. Cancer Res. 2014;74:1227–1237. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kroon P, Berry PA, Stower MJ, Rodrigues G, Mann VM, Simms M, et al. JAK-STAT blockade inhibits tumor initiation and clonogenic recovery of prostate cancer stem-like cells. Cancer research. 2013;73:5288–5298. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Vuk-Pavlovic S, Bulur PA, Lin Y, Qin R, Szumlanski CL, Zhao X, et al. Immunosuppressive CD14+HLA-DRlow/− monocytes in prostate cancer. Prostate. 2010;70:443–455. doi: 10.1002/pros.21078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Nagaraj S, Youn JI, Gabrilovich DI. Reciprocal relationship between myeloid-derived suppressor cells and T cells. J Immunol. 2013;191:17–23. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1300654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Degl’Innocenti E, Grioni M, Capuano G, Jachetti E, Freschi M, Bertilaccio MT, et al. Peripheral T-cell tolerance associated with prostate cancer is independent from CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. Cancer Res. 2008;68:292–300. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hortner M, Nielsch U, Mayr LM, Johnston JA, Heinrich PC, Haan S. Suppressor of cytokine signaling-3 is recruited to the activated granulocyte-colony stimulating factor receptor and modulates its signal transduction. J Immunol. 2002;169:1219–1227. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.3.1219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Shodeinde AL, Barton BE. Potential use of STAT3 inhibitors in targeted prostate cancer therapy: future prospects. Onco Targets Ther. 2012;5:119–125. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S32559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Madonna S, Scarponi C, Doti N, Carbone T, Cavani A, Scognamiglio PL, et al. Therapeutical potential of a peptide mimicking the SOCS1 kinase inhibitory region in skin immune responses. Eur J Immunol. 2013;43:1883–1895. doi: 10.1002/eji.201343370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kim K, Skora AD, Li Z, Liu Q, Tam AJ, Blosser RL, et al. Eradication of metastatic mouse cancers resistant to immune checkpoint blockade by suppression of myeloid-derived cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:11774–11779. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1410626111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES