Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1988 Jun;7(6):1605–1614. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb02986.x

Identification of domains involved in nuclear uptake and histone binding of protein N1 of Xenopus laevis.

J A Kleinschmidt 1, A Seiter 1
PMCID: PMC457143  PMID: 3168999

Abstract

The karyophilic protein N1 (590 amino acids) is an abundant soluble protein of the nuclei of Xenopus laevis oocytes where it forms defined complexes with histones H3 and H4. The amino acid sequence of this protein, as deduced from the cDNA, reveals a putative nuclear targeting signal as well as two acidic domains which are candidates for the interaction with histones. Using two different histone binding assays in vitro we have found that the deletion of the larger acidic domain reduces histone binding drastically to a residual value of approximately 15% of the complete molecule, whereas removal of the smaller acidic domain only slightly reduces histone complex formation in solution, but infers more effectively with binding to immobilized histones. In the primary structure of the protein both histone-binding domains are distant from the conspicuous nuclear accumulation signal sequence (residues 531-537) close to the carboxy terminus which is very similar to the SV40 large T-antigen nuclear targeting sequence. Using a series of N1 mutants altered by deletions or point mutations we show that this signal is required but not sufficient for nuclear accumulation of protein N1. The presence of an additional, more distantly related signal sequence in position 544-554 is also needed to achieve a level of nuclear uptake equivalent to that of the wild-type protein. Results obtained with point mutations support the concept of two nuclear targeting sequences and emphasize the importance of specific lysine and arginine residues in these signal sequences.

Full text

PDF
1605

Images in this article

1606Image
on p.1606
1606Image
on p.1606
1607Image
on p.1607
1607Image
on p.1607
1610Image
on p.1610
1611Image
on p.1611

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ansorge W. Improved system for capillary microinjection into living cells. Exp Cell Res. 1982 Jul;140(1):31–37. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(82)90152-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bonne-Andrea C., Harper F., Sobczak J., De Recondo A. M. Rat liver HMG1: a physiological nucleosome assembly factor. EMBO J. 1984 May;3(5):1193–1199. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb01950.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bonner W. M. Protein migration into nuclei. II. Frog oocyte nuclei accumulate a class of microinjected oocyte nuclear proteins and exclude a class of microinjected oocyte cytoplasmic proteins. J Cell Biol. 1975 Feb;64(2):431–437. doi: 10.1083/jcb.64.2.431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bürglin T. R., De Robertis E. M. The nuclear migration signal of Xenopus laevis nucleoplasmin. EMBO J. 1987 Sep;6(9):2617–2625. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02552.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bürglin T. R., Mattaj I. W., Newmeyer D. D., Zeller R., De Robertis E. M. Cloning of nucleoplasmin from Xenopus laevis oocytes and analysis of its developmental expression. Genes Dev. 1987 Mar;1(1):97–107. doi: 10.1101/gad.1.1.97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dabauvalle M. C., Franke W. W. Karyophilic proteins: polypeptides synthesized in vitro accumulate in the nucleus on microinjection into the cytoplasm of amphibian oocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Sep;79(17):5302–5306. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.17.5302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Davey J., Dimmock N. J., Colman A. Identification of the sequence responsible for the nuclear accumulation of the influenza virus nucleoprotein in Xenopus oocytes. Cell. 1985 Mar;40(3):667–675. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90215-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. De Robertis E. M., Longthorne R. F., Gurdon J. B. Intracellular migration of nuclear proteins in Xenopus oocytes. Nature. 1978 Mar 16;272(5650):254–256. doi: 10.1038/272254a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dilworth S. M., Black S. J., Laskey R. A. Two complexes that contain histones are required for nucleosome assembly in vitro: role of nucleoplasmin and N1 in Xenopus egg extracts. Cell. 1987 Dec 24;51(6):1009–1018. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90587-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dingwall C., Dilworth S. M., Black S. J., Kearsey S. E., Cox L. S., Laskey R. A. Nucleoplasmin cDNA sequence reveals polyglutamic acid tracts and a cluster of sequences homologous to putative nuclear localization signals. EMBO J. 1987 Jan;6(1):69–74. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb04720.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dingwall C., Sharnick S. V., Laskey R. A. A polypeptide domain that specifies migration of nucleoplasmin into the nucleus. Cell. 1982 Sep;30(2):449–458. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90242-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dumont J. N. Oogenesis in Xenopus laevis (Daudin). I. Stages of oocyte development in laboratory maintained animals. J Morphol. 1972 Feb;136(2):153–179. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051360203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Earnshaw W. C. Anionic regions in nuclear proteins. J Cell Biol. 1987 Oct;105(4):1479–1482. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.4.1479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Earnshaw W. C., Honda B. M., Laskey R. A., Thomas J. O. Assembly of nucleosomes: the reaction involving X. laevis nucleoplasmin. Cell. 1980 Sep;21(2):373–383. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90474-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Feldherr C. M., Cohen R. J., Ogburn J. A. Evidence for mediated protein uptake by amphibian oocyte nuclei. J Cell Biol. 1983 May;96(5):1486–1490. doi: 10.1083/jcb.96.5.1486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Feldherr C. M., Kallenbach E., Schultz N. Movement of a karyophilic protein through the nuclear pores of oocytes. J Cell Biol. 1984 Dec;99(6):2216–2222. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.6.2216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Franke W. W., Grund C., Osborn M., Weber K. The intermediate-sized filaments in rat kangaroo PtK2 cells. I. Morphology in situ. Cytobiologie. 1978 Aug;17(2):365–391. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Franz J. K., Franke W. W. Cloning of cDNA and amino acid sequence of a cytokeratin expressed in oocytes of Xenopus laevis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Sep;83(17):6475–6479. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.17.6475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Garnier J., Osguthorpe D. J., Robson B. Analysis of the accuracy and implications of simple methods for predicting the secondary structure of globular proteins. J Mol Biol. 1978 Mar 25;120(1):97–120. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(78)90297-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Glikin G. C., Ruberti I., Worcel A. Chromatin assembly in Xenopus oocytes: in vitro studies. Cell. 1984 May;37(1):33–41. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90298-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hall M. N., Hereford L., Herskowitz I. Targeting of E. coli beta-galactosidase to the nucleus in yeast. Cell. 1984 Apr;36(4):1057–1065. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90055-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hopp T. P., Woods K. R. Prediction of protein antigenic determinants from amino acid sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jun;78(6):3824–3828. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.6.3824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Horowitz S. B., Paine P. L. Cytoplasmic exclusion as a basis for asymmetric nucleocytoplasmic solute distributions. Nature. 1976 Mar 11;260(5547):151–153. doi: 10.1038/260151a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Isenberg I. Histones. Annu Rev Biochem. 1979;48:159–191. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.48.070179.001111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kalderon D., Richardson W. D., Markham A. F., Smith A. E. Sequence requirements for nuclear location of simian virus 40 large-T antigen. Nature. 1984 Sep 6;311(5981):33–38. doi: 10.1038/311033a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kalderon D., Roberts B. L., Richardson W. D., Smith A. E. A short amino acid sequence able to specify nuclear location. Cell. 1984 Dec;39(3 Pt 2):499–509. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90457-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kleinschmidt J. A., Dingwall C., Maier G., Franke W. W. Molecular characterization of a karyophilic, histone-binding protein: cDNA cloning, amino acid sequence and expression of nuclear protein N1/N2 of Xenopus laevis. EMBO J. 1986 Dec 20;5(13):3547–3552. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04681.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kleinschmidt J. A., Fortkamp E., Krohne G., Zentgraf H., Franke W. W. Co-existence of two different types of soluble histone complexes in nuclei of Xenopus laevis oocytes. J Biol Chem. 1985 Jan 25;260(2):1166–1176. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kleinschmidt J. A., Franke W. W. Soluble acidic complexes containing histones H3 and H4 in nuclei of Xenopus laevis oocytes. Cell. 1982 Jul;29(3):799–809. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90442-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kleinschmidt J. A., Scheer U., Dabauvalle M. C., Bustin M., Franke W. W. High mobility group proteins of amphibian oocytes: a large storage pool of a soluble high mobility group-1-like protein and involvement in transcriptional events. J Cell Biol. 1983 Sep;97(3):838–848. doi: 10.1083/jcb.97.3.838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kreis T. E., Birchmeier W. Microinjection of fluorescently labeled proteins into living cells with emphasis on cytoskeletal proteins. Int Rev Cytol. 1982;75:209–214. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)61005-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kristofferson D., Mitchison T., Kirschner M. Direct observation of steady-state microtubule dynamics. J Cell Biol. 1986 Mar;102(3):1007–1019. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.3.1007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Krohne G., Franke W. W. A major soluble acidic protein located in nuclei of diverse vertebrate species. Exp Cell Res. 1980 Sep;129(1):167–189. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(80)90341-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Krohne G. Immunological identification of the karyophilic, histone-binding proteins N1 and N2 in somatic cells and oocytes of diverse amphibia. Exp Cell Res. 1985 May;158(1):205–222. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(85)90444-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lanford R. E., Butel J. S. Construction and characterization of an SV40 mutant defective in nuclear transport of T antigen. Cell. 1984 Jul;37(3):801–813. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90415-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Laskey R. A., Honda B. M., Mills A. D., Finch J. T. Nucleosomes are assembled by an acidic protein which binds histones and transfers them to DNA. Nature. 1978 Oct 5;275(5679):416–420. doi: 10.1038/275416a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Laskey R. A., Mills A. D., Morris N. R. Assembly of SV40 chromatin in a cell-free system from Xenopus eggs. Cell. 1977 Feb;10(2):237–243. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90217-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Lyons R. H., Ferguson B. Q., Rosenberg M. Pentapeptide nuclear localization signal in adenovirus E1a. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Jul;7(7):2451–2456. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.7.2451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Mills A. D., Laskey R. A., Black P., De Robertis E. M. An acidic protein which assembles nucleosomes in vitro is the most abundant protein in Xenopus oocyte nuclei. J Mol Biol. 1980 May 25;139(3):561–568. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(80)90148-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Moreland R. B., Langevin G. L., Singer R. H., Garcea R. L., Hereford L. M. Amino acid sequences that determine the nuclear localization of yeast histone 2B. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Nov;7(11):4048–4057. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.11.4048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Moreland R. B., Nam H. G., Hereford L. M., Fried H. M. Identification of a nuclear localization signal of a yeast ribosomal protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Oct;82(19):6561–6565. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.19.6561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Paine P. L. Diffusive and nondiffusive proteins in vivo. J Cell Biol. 1984 Jul;99(1 Pt 2):188s–195s. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.1.188s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Pennings S., Muyldermans S., Wyns L. Limitations of the poly(glutamic acid) reconstitution method in the reassembly of mono- and dinucleosomes. Biochemistry. 1986 Sep 9;25(18):5043–5051. doi: 10.1021/bi00366a011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Peters R. Nucleo-cytoplasmic flux and intracellular mobility in single hepatocytes measured by fluorescence microphotolysis. EMBO J. 1984 Aug;3(8):1831–1836. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb02055.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Richardson W. D., Roberts B. L., Smith A. E. Nuclear location signals in polyoma virus large-T. Cell. 1986 Jan 17;44(1):77–85. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90486-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Roberts B. L., Richardson W. D., Smith A. E. The effect of protein context on nuclear location signal function. Cell. 1987 Jul 31;50(3):465–475. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90500-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Ruberti I., Worcel A. Mechanism of chromatin assembly in Xenopus oocytes. J Mol Biol. 1986 Jun 5;189(3):457–476. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90317-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Ryoji M., Worcel A. Chromatin assembly in Xenopus oocytes: in vivo studies. Cell. 1984 May;37(1):21–32. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90297-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sanger F., Nicklen S., Coulson A. R. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Dec;74(12):5463–5467. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Schmidt-Zachmann M. S., Hügle-Dörr B., Franke W. W. A constitutive nucleolar protein identified as a member of the nucleoplasmin family. EMBO J. 1987 Jul;6(7):1881–1890. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02447.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Sealy L., Cotten M., Chalkley R. Xenopus nucleoplasmin: egg vs. oocyte. Biochemistry. 1986 May 20;25(10):3064–3072. doi: 10.1021/bi00358a049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Stein A., Whitlock J. P., Jr, Bina M. Acidic polypeptides can assemble both histones and chromatin in vitro at physiological ionic strength. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Oct;76(10):5000–5004. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.10.5000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Taylor J. W., Ott J., Eckstein F. The rapid generation of oligonucleotide-directed mutations at high frequency using phosphorothioate-modified DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985 Dec 20;13(24):8765–8785. doi: 10.1093/nar/13.24.8765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Thomas J. O., Kornberg R. D. An octamer of histones in chromatin and free in solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Jul;72(7):2626–2630. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.7.2626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Walker J. M., Gooderham K., Hastings J. R., Mayes E., Johns E. W. The primary structures of non-histone chromosomal proteins HMG 1 and 2. FEBS Lett. 1980 Dec 29;122(2):264–270. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(80)80453-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Woodland H. R., Adamson E. D. The synthesis and storage of histones during the oogenesis of Xenopus laevis. Dev Biol. 1977 May;57(1):118–135. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(77)90359-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Wychowski C., Benichou D., Girard M. A domain of SV40 capsid polypeptide VP1 that specifies migration into the cell nucleus. EMBO J. 1986 Oct;5(10):2569–2576. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04536.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Wyllie A. H., Laskey R. A., Finch J., Gurdon J. B. Selective DNA conservation and chromatin assembly after injection of SV40 DNA into Xenopus oocytes. Dev Biol. 1978 May;64(1):178–188. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(78)90069-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES