Beating the amorphous limit in thermal conductivity by superlattices design

Abstract

The value measured in the amorphous structure with the same chemical composition is often considered as a lower bound for the thermal conductivity of any material: the heat carriers are strongly scattered by disorder, and their lifetimes reach the minimum time scale of thermal vibrations. An appropriate design at the nano-scale, however, may allow one to reduce the thermal conductivity even below the amorphous limit. In the present contribution, using molecular-dynamics simulation and the Green-Kubo formulation, we study systematically the thermal conductivity of layered phononic materials (superlattices), by tuning different parameters that can characterize such structures. We have discovered that the key to reach a lower-than-amorphous thermal conductivity is to block almost completely the propagation of the heat carriers, the superlattice phonons. We demonstrate that a large mass difference in the two intercalated layers, or weakened interactions across the interface between layers result in materials with very low thermal conductivity, below the values of the corresponding amorphous counterparts.

Materials with low thermal conductivity, κ, are employed in many modern technologies, such as thermal management in electronic devices or thermoelectric energy conversion¹,²,³. In general, low values of κ are observed in disordered solids⁴, including topologically disordered systems and crystalline solids with size or mass disorder⁵,⁶,⁷,⁸. We refer to the former as glasses, to the latter as disordered alloys. While in glasses disorder originates both from molecules size or mass heterogeneity and the topologically amorphous structure, in disordered alloys molecules characterized by heterogeneous attributes are located at ordered lattice sites. The low κ in disordered solids can be rationalized by considering the phenomenological kinetic theory expression⁹ κ = (1/3)Cv²τ, which relates average velocity, v, and lifetime, τ, (and therefore the mean free path ) of phonons to κ (C is the specific heat per unit volume). In good crystals, phonons lifetime is primarily controlled by anharmonic interactions. In contrast, in disordered solids, the disorder (or the elastic heterogeneity¹⁰) reduces τ (or ) and, as a result, κ.

In early experimental investigations⁵,⁶, Cahill et al. have studied the disordered alloys, e.g., (KBr)_1−x(KCN)_x, (NaCl)_1−x(NaCN)_x, and shown that κ can be reduced to the glass value by controlling the relative composition x. In our work⁸ we in turn demonstrated that, in size-disordered crystal (alloy), κ progressively decreases with increasing size mismatch, eventually converging to the corresponding glass value. When this limit is reached, τ is comparable to the time scale of thermal vibrations ( to the particle size), i.e., to the minimum time (length) scale⁸. Heat propagation can therefore be described as a random walk of vibrational energies⁵,⁶, or in terms of non-propagating delocalized modes, the diffusons⁷. For this reason, the value in the glass is generally considered as a lower bound for κ of materials with homogeneous chemical composition⁵,⁶.

A crucial issue⁴ is whether thermal conductivity can be lowered below the glass limit through nanoscale phononic design³,¹¹. This possibility would allow to devise (meta-)materials which are excellent thermal insulators while preserving good electronic properties, as needed in many applications¹,²,³. The most popular design to reach this goal is that of a lamellar superlattice¹²,¹³,¹⁴,¹⁵, often composed of two chemically different intercalated layers, e.g., Si-Ge¹²,¹³ or GaAs-AlAs¹⁴,¹⁵ (see also Fig. 1). In a superlattice, the thermal conductivity tensor is anisotropic, with the cross-plane component, κ_CP, usually lower than the in-plane value, κ_IP¹⁶,¹⁷.

Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the considered superlattice structures.

The superlattice is composed of two FCC-lattice layers, A (red) and B (green). The two layers have identical thickness W/2, where W is the replication period. Here, we measure W as the number of monolayers of the lattice structure, e.g., W = 8 in the displayed case. The distance between adjacent monolayers is a/2 for the perfect FCC structure, where a is the lattice constant.

In recent experiments¹⁸,¹⁹,²⁰, ultra-low values of κ_CP, suggested to be smaller than the amorphous limit, were measured. In particular, Costescu et al.¹⁸ demonstrated that the presence of a high-density of interfaces decreases κ_CP of W-Al₂O₃ nanolaminates, below that of the amorphous Al₂O₃. An experiment by Chiritescu et al.¹⁹ achieved ultra-low thermal conductivity in layered WSe₂ crystals, by disordering the crystalline WSe₂ sheets. Finally, Pernot et al.²⁰ also observed very low values of κ_CP, below that of amorphous Si, in Ge nanodots multi-layers separated by Si crystals.

Although the above experimental works have demonstrated very low values of κ in superlattice systems, we note that these values have not been systematically compared to those assumed in the glasses with exactly the same chemical composition. Since different chemical species are expected to produce different effects on κ, it is therefore still not completely clear whether superlattice structuration alone can lower κ below the amorphous limit. Note, for instance, that very recent numerical work²¹, has shown that a superlattice composed by layers with randomized thicknesses can indeed show a κ below the value pertaining to the disordered-alloy with the same composition. This limit, however, is generally higher than that in the corresponding glass⁵,⁶,⁷,⁸, which should therefore be considered the true amorphous limit to be beaten.

In addition, a general framework to rationalize in a coherent single picture the previous observations of very low κ is, to the best of our knowledge, still lacking.

In this work, we address these two issues. Building on the comparison of the superlattice with the corresponding amorphous structure, we clarify the mechanisms allowing for ultra-low thermal conductivity in the former. We have studied by computer simulation a numerical model that allows one to exactly compare ordered and disordered systems with identical chemical composition and access detailed information on the entire normal modes spectrum, providing, as a consequence, a complete understanding of the heat transfer process. As the lifetime of heat carriers is already minimum in glasses⁸, we demonstrate that the key to even lower thermal conductivities is to suppress their propagation across the interfaces between the constituent layers.

More in details, we have focused on three distinct design principles for superlattices, mimicking similar configurations actually employed in experiments. These are based on the face-centered-cubic (FCC) lattice structure, and are composed of: (S1) two intercalated crystalline layers formed by point particles with different masses; (S2) ordered crystalline layers intercalated to mass-disordered alloy layers; and (S3) identical crystalline layers with modified (weakened) interactions across the interfaces (see the Methods section and Table 1). We show that a large mass difference between layers (S1) and weakened interactions between layers (S3) efficiently obstruct the propagation of phonons, resulting in a very large reduction of the superlattice thermal conductivity, even below the values pertaining to the glass phases with identical composition. Based on our results, we conclude with a discussion of the optimal strategy to follow towards very low thermal conductivity materials.

Table 1. Details of the three superlattice systems investigated in this work.

They are based on the FCC-crystal lattice structure and are composed of: (S1) two intercalated crystalline layers (A and B) formed by point particles with different masses m_A and m_B; (S2) ordered crystalline layers intercalated to mass-disordered alloy layers; and (S3) identical crystalline layers with modified (weakened compared to those intra-layers) interactions across the interfaces. The control parameters are the mass ratio m_B/m_A in S1, the mass ratio m_B2/m_B1 of the disordered alloy layer in S2, and the energy scale ε_AB of the interactions across the interfaces in S3. Number density and temperature were fixed to the values (corresponding to a lattice constant a = 1.58) and T = 10⁻², respectively. The quantities presented in the table are defined in the main text. In the last column we refer to the figure containing the data relative to the indicated system. Additional details about the investigated superlattices and parameters used are given in the Methods section.

In Fig. 1 we show a schematic illustration of a superlattice composed by two intercalated layers, A and B, both of thickness W/2. The competition between two length scales, the repetition period of the superlattice, W, and the mean free path of the superlattice phonons, , determines the coherent or incoherent character of phonon transport, as described in²²,²³,²⁴ and demonstrated by numerical simulations²⁵,²⁶,²⁷ and recent experiments²⁸.

For , the incoherent phonon transport is independent in the different layers, and phonons can be effectively treated as particles. In this case, the Boltzmann transport equation applies²⁹,³⁰, and the particle-like phonons are scattered within the layers (internal resistance) and at the interfaces (interfacial resistance or Kapitza resistance³¹,³²,³³). The thermal conductivity in the cross-plane direction can be written as²²

where

Here, κ_A and κ_B are the thermal conductivities of materials A and B, and is the Kapitza length³⁴. R is the interfacial resistance, which exists even at a perfect interface and depends on the nature of the contacting materials (e.g., crystal-crystal, crystal-glass)³¹,³². For (), the interfacial resistance is relatively large (small) compared to the internal resistance. Both κ_CP and κ_IP (the in-plane thermal conductivity) increase with W, due to the decrease of the interfacial resistance density²⁹,³⁰. In the diffuse limit W → ∞, where the interfacial resistance can be neglected, κ_CP and κ_IP have the upper bounds and , respectively.

When , phonon transport is coherent²²,²³,²⁴,²⁵,²⁶,²⁷,²⁸, and the wave nature of phonons cannot be neglected. In this regime, κ_CP decreases with increasing W, in contrast with the incoherent case. The reduction of κ_CP is explained with the emergence of a band gap at the Brillouin zone boundary, due to band-folding³⁵: increasing W augments the frequency gap in the dispersion relation. This, in turn, decreases the average group velocity v of phonons, finally reducing κ_CP. Mini-umklapp processes³⁶, occurring at the mini-Brillouin zone, also contribute to the reduction of κ_CP. At the crossover length , between the incoherent and the coherent transport regimes, κ_CP assumes a minimum value when plotted against W²²,²³,²⁴,²⁵,²⁶,²⁷,²⁸. We have encountered this situation in the case of superlattice S1, as we will see below.

Details of the structure of the interface between layers are also known to significantly affect phonon transport³⁷,³⁸,³⁹,⁴⁰,⁴¹,⁴²,⁴³,⁴⁴,⁴⁵,⁴⁶. It has been reported that interfacial roughness³⁷,³⁸,³⁹ or mixing⁴⁰,⁴¹ reduce both κ_CP and κ_IP, and can even suppress the coherent nature of phonons, with κ_CP(IP) increasing monotonously at any W. The interface topology is also an important factor to determine the phonon transport⁴²,⁴³. While we will not address precisely this situation in detail here, the superlattice S2 of our study bears some similarities with it.

Finally, the stiffness of interfacial bondings, which can be controlled by applying pressure⁴⁴,⁴⁵ or tuning chemical bonding⁴⁶, has significant effects on heat transport features, which will be demonstrated by the study of the S3 superlattice.

Results

In Table 1, we present the details of the three superlattice systems studied in this work, with values of the important quantities: κ_A and κ_B are the thermal conductivities of layers A and B, respectively; and are the cross- and in-plane diffuse limits of κ_CP and κ_IP; R is the interfacial resistance, the Kapitza length; κ_glass and κ_alloy are the thermal conductivities of the glass and disordered alloy with exactly the same composition as the indicated superlattice.

The number density of all systems was fixed at , with a corresponding crystal lattice constant a = 1.58. In order to minimize anharmonic couplings and focus primarily on the contribution arising from the details of the nano-structuration, we considered a low temperature value T = 10⁻².

Thermal conductivities have been estimated by the Green-Kubo formulation⁴⁷,⁴⁸. We have calculated both components of the superlattices thermal conductivities, κ_CP and κ_IP, by varying the pattern repetition period W. Note that W indicates the number of monolayers of the lattice structure, where the distance between adjacent monolayers is a/2 for the perfect FCC structure (see also Fig. 1). In the following, we systematically compare the value of κ_CP to , κ_glass, κ_alloy, to evaluate the efficiency of the superlattice structures in minimizing heat transfer in the direction of the patterning. The in-plane behaviour has been similarly quantified by comparing κ_IP to . In addition, we have also characterized the vibrational states by using a standard normal-modes analysis⁸,⁴⁹.

All important information about the system models and methods used for the simulation production runs and analysis are given in the Methods section. Additional details about specific points are included in the Supplementary Materials.

S1. Superlattice composed of two intercalated crystalline layers with different masses

In Fig. 2 we show the thermal conductivities, κ_CP and κ_IP (symbols), as functions of the replication period, W, for the layers mass ratios m_B/m_A = 2, 4, and 8. Note that we have chosen to fix the average mass, 〈m〉 = (m_A + m_B)/2 = 1, rather than fixing a reference value m_A = 1 and varying m_B. This latter protocol has indeed an obvious drawback: the average mass would increase when considering different values of the ratio m_B/m_A, implying a trivial effect on the thermal conductivity which scales as 〈m〉^−1/2. This would therefore hinder the possibility to isolate the contribution to lowering the thermal conductivity which originates from the mass mismatch alone.

Figure 2. Thermal conductivity in superlattice S1 composed of two intercalated crystalline layers with different masses.

The cross-plane, κ_CP, and in-plane, κ_IP, components of thermal conductivity are plotted as functions of the repetition period W. The ratio m_B/m_A of the masses in layers A and B is 2 in panel (a), 4 in (b), and 8 in (c). The values and of the diffuse limits (W → ∞), as well as those in the glass and the disordered alloy with the same constituent species are indicated by the horizontal lines. In panels (a) and (b) we also show (dashed black lines), the prediction of Eq. (1) for κ_CP in the incoherent regime, W > 20, with the values of R and included in Table 1. The solid curve interpolating the κ_CP data points in the entire W-range is a guide for eye. The calculation of the displayed error bars is detailed in the Methods section.

The values of the diffuse limits and as well as those of the glass and the disordered alloy constituted by the same species (see Table 1) are also shown as lines in Fig. 2. As expected, the relation holds for the pure materials. In the studied W-range, W = 2 to 40 (monolayers), the in-plane value κ_IP shows a very weak dependence on W, as was observed for superlattices with perfect interfaces in Refs ^26,39. The value of κ_IP is close to, although lower than, , indicating that slight in-plane phonon scattering at the interface is still active.

More interestingly, as W increases, the cross-plane value κ_CP decreases steeply, reaches a minimum value at , and next increases mildly at larger W. This W-dependence is consistent with previous predictions²²,²³,²⁴,²⁵,²⁶,²⁷,²⁸, and corresponds to the crossover at W^* from coherent to incoherent phonon transport. In the incoherent regime, W > 20, from Eq. (1) and the data of κ_CP (dashed line in Fig. 2) we can extract the values of the interfacial resistance, R, and the Kapitza length, , which are presented in Table 1.

Note that for m_B/m_A = 8 (Fig. 2(c)), we do not observe a clear thermal conductivity minimum. More precisely, even at the largest value W = 40, κ_CP is still orders of magnitude lower than , indicating that the interfacial resistance R results in a strong reduction of κ_CP in this range of W. Equivalently, the Kapitza length is significantly larger than the maximum period W = 40. Also, if , Eq. (1) can be approximated as , i. e., κ_CP increases linearly with W, with a slope, , which decreases by increasing the ratio m_B/m_A. For instance, it is for m_B/m_A = 2 and for m_B/m_A = 4. For m_B/m_A = 8, the slope is so small that κ_CP appears almost flat when plotted against W, for 20 ≤ W ≤ 40 (Fig. 2(c)).

The data shown in Fig. 2 demonstrate that κ_CP can be indeed lowered below the disordered alloy limit for m_B/m_A = 2, and even below the glass limit for higher mass heterogeneities, m_B/m_A = 4 and 8. These results are consistent with the experimental work of Ref. 18, and demonstrate that the interface formed between dissimilar materials effectively reduces κ_CP. It is also worth noting that the thermal conductivity tensor is very strongly anisotropic in this case, with .

The vibrational modes of the structure, i.e., the superlattice phonons, are key to understand the above behaviour of thermal conductivity. In Fig. 3 we show the vibrational density of states (vDOS), g(ω), for m_B/m_A = 4 and W = 2 to 80. g_A(ω) and g_B(ω) of the bulk crystals of type A and B as well as the vDOS of the glass and of the disordered alloy are also shown for comparison. Note that . At small W = 2, g(ω) of the superlattice roughly follows that of the disordered alloy, implying that the vibrational states in the two layers are strongly mixed. In this situation, phonons are able to propagate in both the cross- and in-plane directions. On the other hand, as W increases, g(ω) generates features increasingly similar to those identifying g_A(ω) and g_B(ω), separately. In particular, in the low-ω region g(ω) follows g_B(ω) (the heavy crystal B), whereas g_A(ω) (the light crystal A) controls g(ω) in the high-ω region. This result indicates that different parts of the vibrational spectrum are active in the two layers, with high (low)-ω modes preferentially excited in the light (heavy) layer A (B). In this situation, phonon propagation is largely obstructed in the cross-plane direction, leading to the observed large reduction of κ_CP. We remark that phonons propagate in the in-plane direction with small constraints, as shown by the large value of κ_IP close to . This implies that phonons, whose propagations are blocked in the cross-plane direction, are actually specularly reflected at the interface and confined in the in-plane direction.

Figure 3. Vibrational density of states in superlattice S1, for a mass ratio m_B/m_A = 4 with m_A = 0.4 and m_B = 1.6.

In panels (a–f) we show the data corresponding to the repetitions period values W = 2,4,10,20,40,80. For comparison, we also plot g_A(B)(ω) for the homogeneous bulk crystal composed by light (heavy) m_A(B) masses only, together with the data for the glass and the disordered alloy formed by the same constituent species.

The separation of the vibrational states found in the g(ω) becomes more clear when considering the vibrational amplitudes associated with the eigenstates k. In Fig. 4 we show the vibrational amplitudes, and (Eq. (6)), in the two layers A and B for each mode k, together with the binned average values (solid lines). Based on the relations and , we can define a relative degree of excitation of particles in the two layers, by the threshold value 0.5: large excitations correspond to , small excitations to . If , particle vibrations in both layers are of the same degree and correlated.

Figure 4. Vibrational amplitudes of normal modes in superlattice S1, for a mass ratio m_B/m_A = 4 with m_A = 0.4 and m_B = 1.6.

The vibrational amplitudes of the eigenvectors, and , in layers A (light) and B (heavy) for all normal modes k, are plotted as functions of the corresponding eigenfrequency ω^k. and are defined in Eq. (6). The repetitions period values are W = 2,4,10,20,40,80 in panels (a–f). The solid line represents the average values and calculated in bins of the form ω^k ± δω^k/2, with δω^k = 0.5. The horizontal dotted lines represent the threshold value , the vertical lines indicate , corresponding to the high frequency edge of g_B(ω).

At small W = 2,4 we find, particularly in the low-ω region, a large fraction of vibrational states with . As W increases, in the high frequency region , where is the high-frequency boundary in g_B(ω), only particles in the light layer A vibrate (), whereas those in the heavy layer B are almost immobile, as indicated by . In this ω-region, phonon propagation in the cross-plane direction is therefore almost completely suppressed. On the other hand, for , particles pertaining to the heavy layer B show large vibrational amplitudes (), while vibrations in layer A tend to be small (). More in details, for W ≥ 20, we see that the averaged amplitudes are much larger in the B layer () than in the A layer () in the 2 < ω < 7.5 range. Contrary to the case of , however, a significant number of modes are excited in both layers A and B, even with . We therefore conclude that, for , some phonons still propagate in the cross-plane direction, contributing to κ_CP.

We note that our observation of the vibrational separation in both the vDOS and vibrational amplitudes is consistent with results reported previously²⁷,⁴¹,⁵⁰. Indeed, the simulation work of Ref. 27 reported a separation in the vDOS of the Si isotopic-superlattice (²⁸Si-⁴²Si superlattice). A recent simulation work⁴¹ focused on partial inverse participation ratios in a superlattice similar to the one considered here, reporting vibrational modes separation between layers. Ref. 50 attributed the reduction of thermal conductivity to a mechanism described as phonon localization, which we consider to be essentially the same phenomenon as the vibrational separation described here.

We believe that this concept of vibrational separation is a simple and accurate framework to rationalize the behaviour of thermal conductivity in superlattices. In particular, it provides a complete characterization of the minimum in the W-dependence of κ_CP. Indeed, in the range W = 2 to 20 identifying the coherent regime, the vibrational separation hinders the coherent phonon propagation in the cross-plane direction, leading to the large reduction of κ_CP. In contrast, in-plane phonon propagation is very mildly affected by the vibrational separation and, therefore, κ_IP keeps high values. Also, by considering and (solid lines), we conclude that the separation saturates to its maximum level at . Upon further increase W > 20, although averaged values show no significant changes, we recognize an increasing fraction of modes with and for (panels (e) W = 40 and (f) W = 80 in Fig. 4). This observation indicates that the separation tendency for modes with and becomes weaker, i.e., the correlation of vibrational features in the two layers decreases, which corresponds exactly to the incoherent transport picture, and leads to the increase of κ_CP. Although transport becomes completely incoherent only for values of W of the order of the Kapitza length (note that for m_B/m_A = 4), this feature appears as soon as the vibrational separation is saturated, at the crossover point . Thus, the saturation point of the vibrational separation identifies the minimum value of κ_CP, which can be indeed below the glass limit.

S2. Superlattice composed of intercalated ordered crystalline layers and mass disordered alloy layers

This system consists of three components, with masses m_A = 1 in the crystalline layer A, and m_B1 and m_B2 in the disordered alloy layer B. Note that also in this case, on the basis of the same arguments discussed above for S1, the average mass in layer B and that of the entire system are fixed as and , respectively, in order to eliminate the trivial contribution associated with different average values in the different cases.

In Fig. 5, we plot κ_CP and κ_IP for the mass ratios of the layer B, m_B2/m_B1 = 2, 4, and 8. At small W ≤ 4, the values of both κ_CP and κ_IP are very close to those of the disordered bulk alloy formed by the same particles. As W increases, κ_IP increases gradually toward . This increase is controlled by the development of in-plane phonon propagation in the ordered crystalline layer A. Indeed, the g(ω) of the superlattice, shown in Fig. 6, roughly follows that of the disordered bulk alloy at small W = 4, whereas at large W = 20,40 it is dominated by g_A(ω). In particular, the longitudinal peak around becomes clear, corresponding to that of the crystalline layer A.

Figure 5. Thermal conductivity in superlattice S2 composed of ordered crystalline layers intercalated with mass disordered alloy layers.

The two components κ_CP and κ_IP are plotted as functions of W. The mass ratio of the disordered alloy layer m_B2/m_B1 is (a) 2, (b) 4, and (c) 8. The values and of the diffuse limits, together with those in the glass and the disordered alloy are indicated by lines.

Figure 6. Vibrational density of states in superlattice S2.

We show our results for the mass ratio of the disordered alloy layer m_B2/m_B1 = 4, with m_B1 = 0.4 and m_B2 = 1.6. The period W is 4, 20, and 40 for (a–c), respectively. For comparison, we plot g_A(ω) of the bulk crystal formed by particles of mass m_A = 1 (crystal A), g_B(ω) of the disordered alloy with masses m_B1 = 0.4 and m_B2 = 1.6 (alloy B), and the vDOS of the glass and the disordered alloy formed by the same constituent species.

The cross-plane value κ_CP also increases with W, but reaches the limit value already at Since κ_B of the disordered alloy layer B is low (see Table 1), remains low, typically less than twice the disordered alloy value. As a result, the variation of κ_CP with W is small. This result indicates that scattering in the disordered alloy layer B dominates the thermal conduction in the cross-plane direction. Both experimental work⁵¹ on Si(crystal)-SiGe(disordered alloy) nanowires and numerical simulations⁴⁰ have reported similar observations. We also note that the coherent nature of the superlattice phonons in the cross-plane direction, which we observed in the S1 system, breaks down in S2. This is essentially equivalent to previous findings that disorder in interfacial roughness³⁷,³⁸,³⁹, or interfacial species mixing⁴⁰,⁴¹ destroy the coherent features of vibrational excitations present in the investigated superlattices. As a consequence of these features, in superlattices of type S2 the variability of the cross-plane heat transport is strongly bounded, and the minimum limit of κ_CP just corresponds to the disordered alloy limit, i.e., κ_CP cannot be reduced below the glass limit.

Finally it is worth to mention that the thermal conductivity tensor becomes increasingly anisotropic at larger W due to the increase of κ_IP, showing a behaviour different than that observed in S1 where the anisotropy reaches the maximum at the crossover point .

S3. Superlattice composed by identical crystalline layers separated by weakly interacting interfaces

In Fig. 7 we show the W-dependences of κ_CP and κ_IP for the case where the energy scale associated with particles interactions across the interfaces (ε_AB) are lowered compared to those intra-layers, with ε_AB = 0.5 and 0.1 in the two panels. In the figure, we also plot as lines the data for the corresponding one-component crystal and glass with unmodified interactions. Taking the one component system as reference is justified on the basis of earlier work⁸. There, it was shown that when a system of soft spheres is frozen in a disordered state, slightly modifying even a substantial fraction of the interactions does not have any appreciable influence on the vibrational properties, including thermal transport. As a consequence, in the present case we do not expect any relevant modification to κ originating from a limited fraction (scaling with the surface of the interfaces) of modified interactions in the glass sample.

Figure 7. Thermal conductivity in superlattice S3 composed of identical crystalline layers with weakened interface.

The two components κ_CP and κ_IP are plotted as functions of W. The interface interaction ε_AB is 0.5 in (a) and 0.1 in (b). We also show, by the horizontal lines, the thermal conductivities of the corresponding one-component homogeneous bulk crystal and glass with unmodified interactions.

The in-plane value κ_IP is almost independent of W, and is very close to the value pertaining to the crystal. In contrast, κ_CP decreases monotonically by increasing W, and especially in the weaker case ε_AB = 0.1, the observed reduction of κ_CP is dramatic. At W = 10, κ_CP equals the value obtained for the glassy sample, and it is almost two orders of magnitude lower than this value at W = 20. This extremely low κ_CP is consistent with previous experimental work¹⁹.

Some insight about the origin of this observation comes from the data shown in Fig. 8, where we display the average cross-plane distance δz between adjacent crystalline planes (monolayers), normalized to the value in the perfect lattice, a/2. For ε_AB = 0.5 and W = 4, the system keeps the perfect lattice structure, with δz ≡ a/2 for all monolayers. In contrast, as ε_AB decreases and for a large value W = 20, δz becomes substantially larger than a/2 at the interfaces, which therefore assumes a local density lower than the average. At the same time, slightly reduced δz are also observed for the other intra-monolayers, leading to an increase of the local density compared to the average. This heterogeneity hinders energy propagation across the interface and, as a result, phonons are specularly reflected and confined in the in-plane direction. We remark that in the cases with W = 20, the values of δz at the interfaces located at W/2 = 10 and W = 20 are different, with a large discrepancy for ε_AB = 0.1. We rationalize this behaviour by observing that, during the preparation stage of the sample, the applied selective weakening of the interactions destabilizes the global equilibrium of the superlattice, with a concentration of mechanical stress close to the interfaces. Lattice planes far from the boundaries easily recover mechanical equilibrium by coherently reducing their mutual distance. In contrast, particles in monolayers adjacent to the interfaces move both out-of-plane and in-plane, to optimize the local effective spring constants. The optimal solution found depends in general on the details of the local environment, explaining the observed discrepancy in δz at different interfaces.

Figure 8. Distance between adjacent monolayers in superlattice S3.

The average cross-plane distance δz between adjacent crystalline planes plotted for each monolayer, identified by the corresponding order index. We present the value of δz normalized to a/2, the horizontal line δz/(a/2) = 1 therefore indicates the value in the perfect crystalline lattice. The displacements observed in the cases W = 20 are discussed in the main text.

The behaviour of κ_CP can be further elucidated by inspection of the main features of the vibrational spectrum. In Fig. 9 we plot the g(ω) of superlattice S3, together with the vibrational amplitudes and . The transverse and longitudinal phonon branches are observed in g(ω) (top panels) for all cases, similar to the homogeneous bulk crystal. For ε_AB = 0.5, W = 4, g(ω) shows an excess of lower-ω modes compared to those present in the one-component crystal, simply due to the weakened interactions at the interfaces. As ε_AB decreases and W increases, g(ω) deforms, following the appearance of an increasing fraction of modes at increasing higher frequencies. This behaviour is certainly correlated to the observation made above (see Fig. 8) for the cases of ε_AB = 0.5, W = 20 and ε_AB = 0.1, W = 20, that the distance between monolayers far from the interfaces becomes smaller than a/2. The consequent larger mass density makes higher the frequency of phonon modes of given wavelength, leading to the shift of g(ω) towards higher frequencies.

Figure 9. Vibrational density of states and vibrational amplitudes in superlattice S3.

We report data corresponding to the indicated values of the the interfacial interaction energy ε_AB and the repetition period W: (a) ε_AB = 0.5, W = 4, (b) ε_AB = 0.5, W = 20, and (c) ε_AB = 0.1, W = 20. In panels at the top, we show the vDOS g(ω) for the superlattices of type S3, together with those of the corresponding one-component homogeneous crystal and glass with unmodified interactions. In panels at the bottom we show the vibrational amplitudes, and , in layers A and B, plotted as functions of the eigenfrequency ω^k. The solid line represents the average values and , calculated in bins of the form ω^k ± δω^k/2, with δω^k = 0.5. The horizontal dotted lines indicate .

We now focus on the vibrational amplitudes, and (Fig. 9, bottom panels). In the cases with ε_AB = 0.5 and W = 4 and 20, the particles in the two layers A and B show completely equivalent and correlated vibrations for the vast majority of the modes, as indicated by . This result implies that phonons indeed propagate across the weakened interfaces in the cross-plane direction, but they are also partially reflected at the interface, causing the observed reduction of κ_CP. The situation changes drastically in the case ε_AB = 0.1 and W = 20, where the ultra-low value of κ_CP can be reached. Except for the low-ω modes, and are symmetrically randomly distributed around the average values , indicating that particles in layers A and B vibrate independently, in an uncorrelated manner. As a consequence, a very large fraction of vibrational modes do not cross at all the interfaces, but rather undergo a perfect specular reflection. In this situation, heat is not transferred between two adjacent layers A and B, leading to extremely low value of κ_CP, while keeping a high κ_IP.

We conclude by noticing that although specular reflection was also observed in the system S1, the physical mechanism behind this phenomenon is different in the two cases: vibrational separation causes reflection in the former, whereas weakened interactions across the interface, with the resulting augmented spacing between the layers, completely block cross-plane phonon propagation in the latter.

Discussion

We have provided numerically, for the first time to our knowledge, a clear demonstration of very low thermal conductivities in superlattices, below the glassy limit of the corresponding amorphous structures. Blocking phonon propagation in ordered structures via interfaces design is the key principle. We have identified two possible strategies to achieve this goal: imposing a large mass heterogeneity in the intercalated layers (as in system S1) or degrading inter-layers interactions compared to those intra-layers (as in S3). We have found that in both cases phonons are specularly reflected at the interface and confined in the in-plane direction. This reduces the cross-plane thermal conductivity κ_CP below the corresponding glass limit, while keeping the in-plane contribution κ_IP close to the pure crystalline value.

More specifically, in the case of mass mismatch (S1), propagation of phonons with high frequencies () is almost completely suppressed, whereas a fraction of low-frequency phonons () are still able to propagate across the interfaces, contributing to κ_CP (Fig. 4(d–f)). Also, the minimum in thermal conductivity as a function of the repetition period W (Fig. 2) corresponds to a maximum in the vibrational separation between the layers of type A and B. These therefore act as true filters in complementary regions of the vibrational spectrum, suppressing significantly phonons transport in the direction of the replication pattern. On the other hand, attenuated interactions across the interfaces (S3) are able to block phonons at a very wide range of frequencies (see Fig. 9(c)), which results into extremely low values of κ_CP, even orders of magnitude lower than the corresponding glass limit (Fig. 7(b)). In this sense, directly modifying the interfaces seems to be the most effective strategy to obtain very low heat transfer. Note that this is a practically feasible route, since attenuated interfaces can be designed by exploiting materials with weak van der Waals forces among adjacent crystalline planes, as demonstrated in the case of WSe₂ sheets in Ref. 19. Interfaces stiffness modification by controlling pressure⁴⁴,⁴⁵ or chemical bonding⁴⁶ are additional possible routes to directly tune the strength of interfaces.

Our data also suggest that intercalating disordered alloy layers in ordered crystalline layers (S2) is not effective in lowering κ_CP. Indeed, we have demonstrated that in this case disorder is not sufficient to block the propagation of vibrational excitations, even though it makes phonons lifetimes short. The intercalated disordered alloy layer dominates phonon transport in the entire superlattice, notwithstanding the presence of the crystalline layers. As a result, thermal conductivity is very similar to the one of the disordered alloy and is only marginally modified by modulation of the period W (see Fig. 5). Also, as suggested in previous works, disorder in the interfacial roughness³⁷,³⁸,³⁹ or interfacial mixing⁴⁰,⁴¹ seems to already dominate over phonon transport, and destroy the coherent nature of phonons.

In addition, as we understand from our analysis of vibrational amplitudes (Figs 4 and 9), it is much more problematic to block low-ω (long wavelength, λ) phonons propagation, than those with high-ω (short λ). This situation is similar to what has been observed in bulk glasses, where the long-λ acoustic waves are not scattered by the disorder and can propagate over long distances by carrying heat energy⁴⁹,⁵². Therefore, blocking or efficiently scattering the long-λ phonons is also a key factor to achieve very low thermal conductivities, as was pointed out in Ref. 53. A possibility to realize this task is embedding in the targeted material objects featuring larger typical sizes, including nano-particles⁵⁴,⁵⁵ or nano(quantum)-dots²⁰,⁵⁶. Based on this strategy, very low thermal conductivity was achieved experimentally in a Si-Ge quantum-dot superlattice²⁰, even below the amorphous Si value. The additional possibility of introducing large size defects by the porous structuring of materials has also been explored in a recent numerical work⁵⁷. Here, values of thermal conductivity 10⁴ times smaller than that of bulk Si were reached in Si phononic crystals with spherical pores.

An other important point must be underlined. In the present work we have investigated the different systems at low temperature, to both focus on plainly structural effects and keep contact with the well controlled harmonic limit. Anharmonicities, however, are expected to play a crucial role at temperatures higher than the Debye temperature, T_D, which are those relevant for technological applications. This is a crucial aspect to be explored in extended future work.

In conclusion, we note that the three superlattice structures studied in the present work show totally different W-dependences of cross and in-plane thermal conductivities. Our results therefore not only contribute to a deeper understanding of the physical mechanisms behind very-low thermal conductivity, they also provide insight for developing new design concepts for materials with controlled heat conduction behaviour.

Methods

System description

In this Section we provide details on the numerical models we have used for the superlattices. The corresponding amorphous structures (glasses) and disordered alloys with exactly the same composition were also prepared, for the sake of comparison with superlattice phases. We have considered in all cases a 3-dimensional cubic box, of volume V = L³ (L being the linear box size), with periodic boundary conditions in all directions. In the superlattice and disordered alloy cases, particles were distributed on the FCC lattice sites. In the glass phases, they were frozen in topologically random positions following a rapid quench from the normal liquid phase below the glass transition temperature T_g, avoiding crystallization (see, for instance, Ref. 49 for details on the preparation of glasses). Particles, i and j, interact via soft-sphere (SS) or Lennard-Jones (LJ) potentials:

where r is the distance between those two particles, and σ^ij and ε^ij are the interparticle diameter and interaction energy scale, respectively. The potential is cut-off and shifted at r_c = 2.5σ^ij. Particle i has mass mⁱ, and we have used σ, ε/k_B (k_B is the Boltzmann constant), and m as units of length, temperature, and mass. As a reference, for Argon σ = 3.4 Å, ε/k_B = 120 K, and m = 39.96 a.m.u. We considered the number density , corresponding to a lattice constant .

We prepared three superlattices, composed of intercalated FCC lattice layers, A and B, both of thickness W/2, as schematically illustrated in Fig. 1. The first superlattice (S1) consists of two crystalline layers formed by point particles with different masses, m_A and m_B. We have considered mass ratios m_B/m_A > 1, while keeping a constant average mass (m_A + m_B)/2 = 1. As an example, the case m_B/m_A = 4 corresponds to m_A = 0.4 and m_B = 1.6. We have dubbed A and B as the light and heavy layers, respectively. Note that a mass ratio of m_B/m_A = 2.5 corresponds to the case of the realistic Si-Ge superlattice. Except for the above mass difference in the different layers, all particles are characterized by the same properties. In particular, they interact via the SS potential , with σ^ij = ε^ij = 1.

The second superlattice (S2) is composed of an ordered crystalline layer A intercalated to a disordered alloy layer B. m_A = 1 in A, whereas in B half of the particles have mass m_B1, m_B2 the others, and are randomly distributed on the lattice sites. Again, m_B1 and m_B2 are determined by the mass ratio m_B2/m_B1> 1, keeping a constant average value (m_B1 + m_B2)/2 = 1. All particles in both layers interact via the SS potential with σ^ij = ε^ij = 1.

The third superlattice (S3) is composed of identical crystalline layers A and B, but the interactions among particles in different layers (i.e., across the interfaces) are modified (weakened) compared to those intra-layers. All particles have mass m_A = m_B = 1, and interact via the LJ potential , with σ^ij = ε^ij = 1. The energy scale of interactions between particles pertaining to different layers are, however, reduced to ε^ij = ε_AB < 1.

MD simulation and the Green-Kubo method for the calculation of thermal conductivity

In the present study, all simulations have been realized by using the large-scale, massively parallel molecular dynamics simulation tool LAMMPS⁵⁸. The systems were first equilibrated at relatively low temperature T = 10⁻² by MD simulation in the NVT-ensemble. This choice was dictated by the need to reduce anharmonic effects, in order to primarily focus on the contribution of the structural features of the superlattices on thermal conductivity. We must note that our approach is classical, and does not take into account the quantum mechanisms active in the low-T regime⁹. These effects have important implications, increasing the contribution to the thermal conductivity coming from low-ω vibrational excitations. At present, however, it is not obvious and still under debate how to effectively include quantum effects into a classical system⁵⁹,⁶⁰, and we have therefore chosen to stay within a fully classical approach.

Following the equilibration stage, we performed the production runs in the NVE-ensemble. The Green-Kubo formulation⁴⁷,⁴⁸ was next applied to calculate the thermal conductivities, in the cross-plane and in-plane directions, respectively:

Here, J_x,y and J_z are the heat currents in the in-plane (x,y) and cross-plane (z) directions, and 〈〉 denotes the ensemble average. Landry et al.⁴⁸ have carefully confirmed the validity of the Green-Kubo method for the calculation of superlattices thermal conductivity, by comparison with the direct method based on non-equilibrium simulation. In the bulk glasses and disordered alloys, , i.e., heat conduction is isotropic, whereas in the superlattices, they are expected to assume different values¹⁶,¹⁷.

More in details, the equations of motions were integrated numerically with a time step, δt = 5 × 10⁻³, for a total run-time t_run = N_runδt = 10⁵ (N_run = 2 × 10⁷ steps) for S1 and t_run = 10⁴ (N_run = 2 × 10⁶ steps) for both S2 and S3. The systems snapshots extracted from the trajectory have been used to calculate the correlation functions, of Eq. (4), which have been subsequently integrated numerically over a finite time window Δt. We have observed a clear convergence of the integrals for κ_CP,IP, to the limits of Eq. (4) for Δt = 10⁴ for S1, and Δt = 10³ for both S2 and S3. For each considered superlattice, and all repetition periods W, we have performed 10 independent calculations starting from different initial system configurations. These has allowed us to obtain 10 independent sample values for κ_CP and 2 × 10 = 20 (we have considered both the x and y components) for κ_IP. These values were used to calculate averages and sample-to-sample fluctuations (standard deviations), which are shown as error bars in Figs. 2,5 and 7. More details on these calculations are reported in the Supplementary Materials.

Analysis of finite system size effect on thermal conductivity

In the Green-Kubo calculations of thermal conductivities, one must be attentive to finite system size effects⁴⁷,⁴⁸. Indeed, long-wavelength phonons with λ > L are excluded from the simulation box due to the finite value L of the box size, which imposes important size effects on the numerical determination of κ. The box size therefore needs to be large enough to include a vibrational spectrum sufficient to establish an accurate description of anharmonic coupling (scattering) processes⁴⁷. We note that the considered T = 10⁻² is low enough to substantially reduce anharmonic effects, but anharmonic couplings are still present. We can take care of finite size effects by increasing L to values where κ_CP and κ_IP become L-independent. For the glass and disordered alloy thermal conductivities, we have confirmed that a system size L = 10a (N = 4,000) is sufficiently large to obtain correct values of , without any size effect⁸.

In the superlattice cases, the appropriate L depends on the considered structure and the periodic repetition length W⁴⁸. More in details, we paid particular attention to the number P of repetitions, defined from L = PW, necessary to produce sufficient anharmonic couplings of phonons in the cross-plane direction. We have therefore investigated the presence of finite size effects by analyzing different systems with sizes ranging from L = 10a (20 monolayers, N = 4,000) to 24a (48 monolayers, N = 55,296). We provide details of our analysis of the finite-size effects in the Supplementary Materials. In Figs. 2,5 and 7, we plot the values obtained by using the largest systems (the exact system size depends on both the superlattice type and W), which show the smallest finite-size effects.

For the S1 superlattice, we confirmed that the required number P of repetitions becomes larger for smaller W⁴⁸: one period (L = W) only is adequate for W ≥ 20, whereas four periods or more (L ≥ 4W) are required for W ≤ 8 (see the Supplementary Materials). We have therefore employed four pattern repetitions (L = 4W) for 10 ≤ W ≤ 12 and two (L = 2W) for 14 ≤ W ≤ 18. This behaviour is simple to rationalize by inspecting the data in Fig. 2, where the crossover between incoherent and coherent phonon transport occurs around . In the coherent regime W < 20, the wave character of the phonons becomes important, and therefore a larger number of repetitions is necessary to produce the coherent wave interference processes correctly. In contrast, smaller values of P are needed (even P = 1) in the incoherent regime W > 20, where the incoherent particle nature of the phonons appears.

For the S2 and S3 superlattices the system size effects issue is much less pronounced than in the S1 case. We have confirmed that P = 1 or 2 (L = W or 2W) are sufficient for W ≥ 20, while two or more repetitions (L ≥ 2W) are appropriate for W < 20, for both S2 and S3 (see the Supplementary Materials). We can understand this behaviour by noticing that phonon transport is mainly determined by the scattering processes in the disordered alloy layer in S2, and the blocking at the weak interface for S3. In both cases the missing long wavelength phonons, with λ > L, play very little role in phonon transport and finite system size effects are consequently negligible.

Normal modes analysis

We have characterized the superlattice vibrational states (superlattice phonons) by performing a standard normal-mode analysis⁸,⁴⁹. We have diagonalized the dynamical (Hessian) matrix calculated at local minima of the potential energy landscape, and obtained eigenvalues λ^k and eigenvectors (polarization vectors) . Here, j is the particle index, and k = 1, 2,…, 3N − 3 is the eigenmode number, where we have disregarded the three vanishing Goldstone modes. The eigenvectors are normalized such that , where δ_kl is the Kronecker delta function. The eigenfrequencies are next calculated as , and the associated probability distribution (normalized histogram) directly provides the vDOS:

In addition, from the eigenvector e^k we have defined the vibrational amplitudes of mode k for layers A and B:

Note that for each k and, therefore, . Based on the values of and , one can determine in which layer particles are more displaced (excited) according to the associated eigenvector e^k. In particular, if (), particles in layer A (B) contribute more to mode k than those in layer B (A). In the case , particles in both layers contribute equivalently, and in a correlated manner. Note that the normal mode analysis provides us with the system vibrational states in the harmonic limit T → 0 which, we believe, is an appropriate approximation for our case T = 10⁻², where anharmonicities are weak.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Mizuno, H. et al. Beating the amorphous limit in thermal conductivity by superlattices design. Sci. Rep. 5, 14116; doi: 10.1038/srep14116 (2015).