Skip to main content
Standards in Genomic Sciences logoLink to Standards in Genomic Sciences
. 2015 Jul 24;10:44. doi: 10.1186/s40793-015-0020-2

High-quality permanent draft genome sequence of Rhizobium sullae strain WSM1592; a Hedysarum coronarium microsymbiont from Sassari, Italy

Ron Yates 1,2, John Howieson 2, Sofie E De Meyer 2, Rui Tian 2, Rekha Seshadri 3, Amrita Pati 3, Tanja Woyke 3, Victor Markowitz 4, Natalia Ivanova 3, Nikos Kyrpides 3,5, Angelo Loi 1, Brad Nutt 1, Giovanni Garau 6, Leonardo Sulas 7, Wayne Reeve 2,
PMCID: PMC4572446  PMID: 26380632

Abstract

Rhizobium sullae strain WSM1592 is an aerobic, Gram-negative, non-spore-forming rod that was isolated from an effective nitrogen (N2) fixing root nodule formed on the short-lived perennial legume Hedysarum coronarium (also known as Sulla coronaria or Sulla). WSM1592 was isolated from a nodule recovered from H. coronarium roots located in Ottava, bordering Sassari, Sardinia in 1995. WSM1592 is highly effective at fixing nitrogen with H. coronarium, and is currently the commercial Sulla inoculant strain in Australia. Here we describe the features of R. sullae strain WSM1592, together with genome sequence information and its annotation. The 7,530,820 bp high-quality permanent draft genome is arranged into 118 scaffolds of 118 contigs containing 7.453 protein-coding genes and 73 RNA-only encoding genes. This rhizobial genome is sequenced as part of the DOE Joint Genome Institute 2010 Genomic Encyclopedia for Bacteria and Archaea-Root Nodule Bacteria (GEBA-RNB) project.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40793-015-0020-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Keywords: Root-nodule bacteria, Nitrogen fixation, Rhizobia, Alphaproteobacteria, GEBA-RNB

Introduction

The accessibility and supply of nitrogen fertilizer is an ever-increasing challenge that world agriculture faces [1]. Despite the fact the Earth’s atmosphere consists of approximately 78 % dinitrogen, it is in a form that must be converted before it can be utilised by plants [2]. Conversion of N2 can be achieved by the chemical synthesis of natural gas but these methods can be considered unsustainable because of the use of exhaustible and costly fossil fuel resources [3]. In addition, the manufacturing process not only increases the greenhouse gas emissions but also field N fertiliser application have been directly linked to contaminating and leading to detrimental effects in ecosystems and waterways. Alternatively, a more sustainable and environmentally friendly process of acquiring N is through the biological process of N fixation by diazotrophs [2]. Most biological fixation in world agriculture is provided from the process of symbiotic nitrogen fixation, which occurs following the successful formation of an effective symbiosis by leguminous plants and bacterial microsymbionts [4].

The productive efficiencies of SNF in agricultural areas rely on considerable efforts by researchers and producers in matching suitable legume hosts with their compatible microsymbionts [5]. Some agricultural areas farm with indigenous legumes, while others embark on introducing exotic legumes and their compatible microsymbionts from different geographical locations that are edaphically and climatically suited to their own [4]. In Australia for instance, selection programs have enabled the domestication of new Mediterranean legume species and their microsymbionts [6]. One such grazing legume species commercially introduced into Australian and New Zealand agriculture includes the Papilionoid legume Hedysarum coronarium (also known as Sulla coronaria or Sulla). Sulla is a deep-rooted, short-lived perennial pasture legume that is grown throughout Mediterranean countries where it is fed green, used for silage or as hay [7]. It is noted that the microsymbionts of Sulla display a high level of specificity for nodulation and nitrogen fixation [8]. However, when effectively nodulated Sulla plants have the ability to biologically fix large amounts of nitrogen for increased paddock fertility [9].

Rhizobium sullae strain WSM1592 is the current Australian commercial inoculant for Sulla after replacing strain CC1335 in 2006. This strain has also been deposited in the Western Australian Soil Microbiology collection and is available for research. WSM1592 was isolated in 1995 from a nodule collected from a Sulla plant sampled on a roadside in calcareous loamy sand near the Ottava agriculture research farm, east of Sassari in Sardinia, Italy. The location has a Mediterranean climate with a long-term mean seasonal rainfall of 547 mm. Here we present a preliminary description of the general features for Rhizobium sullae strain WSM1592 together with its genome sequence and annotation.

Organism information

Classification and features

R. sullae strain WSM1592 is a motile, Gram-negative rod (Fig. 1 Left and Center) in the order Rhizobiales of the class Alphaproteobacteria. It is fast growing, forming colonies within 3–4 days when grown on half strength Lupin Agar (½LA) [10], tryptone-yeast extract agar (TY) [11] or a modified yeast-mannitol agar (YMA) [12] at 28 °C. Colonies on ½LA are white-opaque, slightly domed and moderately mucoid with smooth margins (Fig. 1 Right).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Images of Rhizobium sullae strain WSM1592 using scanning (Left) and transmission (Center) electron microscopy and the appearance of colony morphology on solid media (Right)

Figure 2 shows the phylogenetic relationship of R. sullae strain WSM1592 in a 16S rRNA gene sequence based tree. This strain is phylogenetically the most related to Rhizobium sullae IS 123T, Rhizobium leguminosarumUSDA 2370T and Rhizobium phaseoliATCC 14482T with sequence identities to the WSM1592 16S rRNA gene sequence of 100 %, 99.84 % and 99.84 %, respectively, as determined using the EzTaxon-e server [13]. Rhizobium sullae IS 123T was isolated from a Hedysarum coronarium root nodule discovered in Southern Spain [14]. In contrast, R. leguminosarumUSDA 2370T was isolated from an effective nodule of Pisum sativum and is also able to nodulate Trifolium repens and Phaseolus vulgaris [15]. R. phaseoliATCC 14482T was originally isolated from nodules of Phaseolus vulgaris and has been shown to nodulate Trifolium repens, but not Pisum sativum [15].

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of R. sullae strain WSM1592 (shown in blue print) relative to other type and non-type rhizobia strains using a 901 bp internal region of the 16S rRNA gene. Bradyrhizobium elkanii ATCC 49852T was used as an outgroup. All sites were informative and there were no gap-containing sites. Phylogenetic analyses were performed using MEGA, version 5.05 [33]. The tree was built using the maximum likelihood method with the General Time Reversible model. Bootstrap analysis with 500 replicates was performed to assess the support of the clusters. Type strains are indicated with a superscript T. Strains with a genome sequencing project registered in GOLD [18] have the GOLD ID mentioned after the strain number and represented in bold, otherwise the NCBI accession number is provided. Finished genomes are designated with an asterisk

Minimum Information about the Genome Sequence [16] of WSM1592 is provided in Table 1 and Additional file 1: Table S1.

Table 1.

Classification and general features of R. sullae strain WSM1592 [16, 34]

MIGS ID Property Term Evidence code
Classification Domain Bacteria TAS [35]
Phylum Proteobacteria TAS [36, 37]
Class Alphaproteobacteria TAS [38]
Order Rhizobiales TAS [39]
Family Rhizobiaceae TAS [40]
Genus Rhizobium TAS [41]
Species Rhizobium sullae TAS [14]
(Type) strain WSM1592 IDA
Gram stain Negative IDA
Cell shape Rod IDA
Motility Motile IDA
Sporulation Non-sporulating NAS
Temperature range Not reported
Optimum temperature 28 °C NAS
pH range; Optimum Not reported
Carbon source Not reported
MIGS-6 Habitat Soil, root nodule, on host IDA
MIGS-6.3 Salinity Non-halophile NAS
MIGS-22 Oxygen requirement Aerobic IDA
MIGS-15 Biotic relationship Free living, symbiotic IDA
MIGS-14 Pathogenicity Non-pathogenic NAS
MIGS-4 Geographic location Sassari, Italy IDA
MIGS-5 Soil collection date 20 May 1995 IDA
MIGS-4.1 Latitude 8.465 IDA
MIGS-4.2 Longitude 40.777 IDA
MIGS-4.4 Altitude 83 m IDA

Evidence codes – IDA Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [42]

Symbiotaxonomy

Hedysarum coronarium is a short-lived perennial pasture legume native to the Mediterranean basin and throughout the Hedysarum genus there is a large degree of specificity in symbiotic compatibility within this region [8]. Rhizobium sullaeWSM1592 nodulates (Nod+) and fixes nitrogen effectively (Fix+) with Hedysarum coronarium. However, inoculation of H. spinosissimum, H. flexuosum and H. carnosum with WSM1592 results in mostly Nod- but always Fix-.

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its environmental and agricultural relevance to issues in global carbon cycling, alternative energy production, and biogeochemical importance, and is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea, The Root Nodulating Bacteria chapter project at the U.S. Department of Energy, Joint Genome Institute [17]. The genome project is deposited in the Genomes OnLine Database [18] and the high-quality permanent draft genome sequence in IMG [19]. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the JGI using state of the art sequencing technology [20]. A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Project information

MIGS ID Property Term
MIGS-31 Finishing quality High-quality permanent draft
MIGS-28 Libraries used Illumina Std PE (2x150bps)
MIGS-29 Sequencing platforms Illumina HiSeq 2000
MIGS-31.2 Fold coverage 877x
MIGS-30 Assemblers Velvet 1.1.04; Allpaths-LG r39750
MIGS-32 Gene calling methods Prodigal 1.4
Locus Tag A3C1
Genbank ID ATZB00000000
Genbank Date of Release December 12, 2013
GOLD ID Gp0010240
BIOPROJECT PRJNA165333
MIGS-13 Source Material Identifier WSM1592
Project relevance Symbiotic N2 fixation, agriculture

Growth conditions and genomic DNA preparation

R. sullaeWSM1592 was cultured to mid logarithmic phase in 60 ml of TY rich media [11] on a gyratory shaker at 28 °C. DNA was isolated from the cells using a CTAB (Cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide) bacterial genomic DNA isolation method [21].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The draft genome of R. sullae strain WSM1592 was generated at the DOE Joint Genome Institute using state of the art technology [20]. An Illumina Std shotgun library was constructed and sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform which generated 29,255,624 reads. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing performed at the JGI can be found at the JGI’s web site [22]. All raw Illumina sequence data was passed through DUK, a filtering program developed at JGI, which removes known Illumina sequencing and library preparation artifacts (Mingkun L, Copeland A, Han J. unpublished). Following steps were then performed for assembly: (1) filtered Illumina reads were assembled using Velvet (version 1.1.04) [23] (2) 1–3 Kbp simulated paired end reads were created from Velvet contigs using wgsim [24] (3) Illumina reads were assembled with simulated read pairs using Allpaths–LG (version r39750) [25]. Parameters for assembly steps were: 1) Velvet (velveth: 63 –shortPaired and velvetg: −very_clean yes –exportFiltered yes –min_contig_lgth 500 –scaffolding no–cov_cutoff 10) 2) wgsim (−e 0 –1 76 –2 76 –r 0 –R 0 –X 0) 3) Allpaths–LG (PrepareAllpathsInputs: PHRED_64 = 1 PLOIDY = 1 FRAG_COVERAGE = 125 JUMP_COVERAGE = 25 LONG_JUMP_COV = 50, RunAllpathsLG: THREADS = 8 RUN = std_shredpairs TARGETS = standard VAPI_WARN_ONLY = True OVERWRITE = True). The final draft assembly contained 118 contigs in 118 scaffolds. The total size of the genome is 7.5 Mbp and the final assembly is based on 2,498,075,850 bp of Illumina data, which provides an average of 877× coverage of the genome.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [26], as part of the DOE-JGI genome annotation pipeline [27, 28]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Centre for Biotechnology Information non-redundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. The tRNAScanSE tool [29] was used to find tRNA genes, whereas ribosomal RNA genes were found by searches against models of the ribosomal RNA genes built from SILVA [30]. Other non–coding RNAs such as the RNA components of the protein secretion complex and the RNase P were identified by searching the genome for the corresponding Rfam profiles using INFERNAL [31]. Additional gene prediction analysis and manual functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes-Expert Review system [32] developed by the Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA, USA.

Genome properties

The genome is 7,530,820 nucleotides 59.87 % GC content (Table 3 and comprised of 118 scaffolds of 118 contigs. From a total of 7,526 genes, 7,453 were protein encoding and 73 RNA only encoding genes. The majority of genes (78.42 %) were assigned a putative function whilst the remaining genes were annotated as hypothetical. The distribution of genes into COG functional categories is presented in Table 4.

Table 3.

Genome statistics

Attribute Value % of Total
Genome size (bp) 7,530,820 100.00
DNA coding (bp) 6,571,312 87.26
DNA G + C (bp) 4,508,646 59.87
DNA scaffolds 118
Total genes 7,526 100.00
Protein coding genes 7,453 99.03
RNA genes 73 0.97
Pseudo genes 0 0
Genes in internal clusters 538 7.15
Genes with function prediction 5,902 78.42
Genes assigned to COGs 5,148 68.40
Genes with Pfam domains 6,174 82.04
Genes with signal peptides 659 8.76
Genes with transmembrane helices 1,699 22.58
CRISPR repeats 0 0

Table 4.

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Code Value % age COG Category
J 186 3.25 Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A 0 0.00 RNA processing and modification
K 554 9.67 Transcription
L 158 2.76 Replication, recombination and repair
B 2 0.03 Chromatin structure and dynamics
D 36 0.63 Cell cycle control, Cell division, chromosome partitioning
V 65 1.13 Defense mechanisms
T 211 3.68 Signal transduction mechanisms
M 293 5.11 Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis
N 68 1.19 Cell motility
U 112 1.95 Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport
O 167 2.91 Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C 327 5.71 Energy production and conversion
G 614 10.71 Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E 684 11.94 Amino acid transport and metabolism
F 107 1.87 Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H 174 3.04 Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I 196 3.42 Lipid transport and metabolism
P 318 5.55 Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q 138 2.41 Secondary metabolite biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R 743 12.96 General function prediction only
S 578 10.09 Function unknown
- 2378 31.60 Not in COGS

The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the genome

Conclusions

Rhizobium sullaeWSM1592 was isolated from a root nodule of Hedysarum coronarium (also known as Sulla coronaria). Phylogenetic analysis revealed that WSM1592 is the most closely related to Hedysarum coronarium IS 123T, which was also isolated from Hedysarum coronarium growing in Southern Spain. The genome of WSM1592 is the first to be described for a strain of Rhizobium sullae and is 7.5 Mbp, with a GC content of 59.87 %. As expected this genome contains the nitrogenase-RXN MetaCyc pathway characterized by the multiprotein nitrogenase complex and has been shown to fix effectively with Hedysarum coronarium. The genome attributes of WSM1592 will be important for the characterisation of the genetic determinants required for the establishment of an effective symbiosis with Hedysarum.

Acknowledgements

This work was performed under the auspices of the US Department of Energy’s Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research Program, and by the University of California, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC52-07NA27344, and Los Alamos National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-06NA25396.

Abbreviations

GEBA-RNB

Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and ArchaeaRoot Nodule Bacteria

JGI

Joint Genome Institute

TY

Trypton Yeast

CTAB

Cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide

WSM

Western Australian Soil Microbiology

SNF

Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation

Additional file

Additional file 1: Table S1. (82.7KB, pdf)

Associated MIGS record for WSM1592.

Footnotes

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

RY and JH supplied the strain and background information for this project, TR supplied DNA to JGI and performed all imaging, SDM and WR drafted the paper, RY provided financial support and all other authors were involved in sequencing the genome and editing the final paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Contributor Information

Ron Yates, Email: ronald.yates@agric.wa.gov.au.

John Howieson, Email: J.Howieson@murdoch.edu.au.

Sofie E. De Meyer, Email: sofdemey@hotmail.com

Rui Tian, Email: protein17@yahoo.com.sg.

Rekha Seshadri, Email: rseshadri@lbl.gov.

Amrita Pati, Email: APati@lbl.gov.

Tanja Woyke, Email: twoyke@lbl.gov.

Victor Markowitz, Email: VMMarkowitz@lbl.gov.

Natalia Ivanova, Email: NNIvanova@lbl.gov.

Nikos Kyrpides, Email: nckyrpides@lbl.gov.

Angelo Loi, Email: angelo.loi@agric.wa.gov.au.

Brad Nutt, Email: bradley.nutt@agric.wa.gov.au.

Giovanni Garau, Email: ggarau@uniss.it.

Leonardo Sulas, Email: l.sulas@cspm.ss.cnr.it.

Wayne Reeve, Email: W.Reeve@murdoch.edu.au.

References

  • 1.Herridge DF, Peoples MB, Boddey RM. Global inputs of biological nitrogen fixation in agricultural systems. Plant Soil. 2008;311:1–18. doi: 10.1007/s11104-008-9668-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sprent JI. Legume nodulation: A global perspective. Oxford, U.K: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vance CP. Symbiotic nitrogen fixation and phosphorus acquisition. Plant nutrition in a world of declining renewable resources. Plant Physiol. 2001;127:390–7. doi: 10.1104/pp.010331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Howieson JG, Yates RJ, Foster K, Real D, Besier B. Prospects for the future use of legumes. In: Dilworth MJ, James EK, Sprent JI, Newton WE, editors. Leguminous nitrogen-fixing symbioses. London, UK: Elsevier; 2008. pp. 363–94. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sessitsch A, Howieson JG, Perret X, Antoun H, Martinez-Romero E. Advances in Rhizobium research. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2002;21:323–78. doi: 10.1080/0735-260291044278. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Howieson JG, Loi A, Carr SJ. Biserrula pelecinus L. - a legume pasture species with potential for acid, duplex soils which is nodulated by unique root-nodule bacteria. Aust J Agric Res. 1995;46:997–1009. doi: 10.1071/AR9950997. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Foote A. Local cultivar adaptation of Mediterranean Sulla. N Z J Exp Agric. 1988;153:25–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kishinevsky BD, Nandasena KG, Yates RJ, Nemas C, Howieson JG. Phenotypic and genetic diversity among rhizobia isolated from three Hedysarum species: H. spinosissimum, H. coronarium and H. flexuosum. Plant Soil. 2003;251:143–53. doi: 10.1023/A:1022967213088. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sulas L, Seddaiu G, Muresu R, Roggero PP. Nitrogen fixation of Sulla under mediterranean conditions. Agron J. 2009;101:1470–8. doi: 10.2134/agronj2009.0151. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Howieson JG, Ewing MA, D‘antuono MF. Selection for acid tolerance in Rhizobium meliloti. Plant Soil. 1988;105:179–88. doi: 10.1007/BF02376781. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Beringer JE. R factor transfer in Rhizobium leguminosarum. J Gen Microbiol. 1974;84:188–98. doi: 10.1099/00221287-84-1-188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Terpolilli JJ. Why are the symbioses between some genotypes of Sinorhizobium and Medicago suboptimal for N2 fixation? Murdoch University: Microbiology; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kim O-S, Cho Y-J, Lee K, Yoon S-H, Kim M, Na H, Park S-C, Jeon YS, Lee J-H, Yi H, Won S, Chun J. Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2012;62:716–21. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.038075-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Squartini A, Struffi P, Döring H, Selenska-Pobell S, Tola E, Giacomini A, Vendramin E, Velázquez E, Mateos PF, Martínez-Molina E, Dazzo FB, Casella S, Nuti MP. Rhizobium sullae sp. nov. (formerly ’Rhizobium hedysari’), the root-nodule microsymbiont of Hedysarum coronarium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002;52:1267–76. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.01821-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ramirez-Bahena MH, Garcia-Fraile P, Peix A, Valverde A, Rivas R, Igual JM, Mateos PF, Martinez-Molina E, Velazquez E. Revision of the taxonomic status of the species Rhizobium leguminosarum (Frank 1879) Frank 1889(AL), Rhizobium phaseoli Dangeard 1926(AL) and Rhizobium trifolii Dangeard 1926AL. R-trifolii is a later synonym of R-leguminosarum. Reclassification of the strain R-leguminosarum DSM 30132 (= NCIMB 11478) as Rhizobium pisi sp nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2008;58:2484–90. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65621-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen M, Angiuoli SV, Ashburner M, Axelrod N, Baldauf S, Ballard S, Boore JL, Cochrane G, Cole J, Dawyndt P, de Vos P, de Pamphilis C, Edwards R, Faruque N, Feldman R, Gilbert J, Gilna P, Glöckner FO, Goldstein P, Guralnick R, Haft D, Hancock D, et al. Towards a richer description of our complete collection of genomes and metagenomes “Minimum Information about a Genome Sequence ” (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26:541–7. doi: 10.1038/nbt1360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chen IM, Markowitz VM, Chu K, Anderson I, Mavromatis K, Kyrpides NC, Ivanova NN. Improving microbial genome annotations in an integrated database context. PLoS One. 2013;8:e54859. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mavromatis K, Ivanova NN, Chen IM, Szeto E, Markowitz VM, Kyrpides NC. The DOE-JGI standard operating procedure for the annotations of microbial genomes. Stand Genomic Sci. 2009;1:63–7. doi: 10.4056/sigs.632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lowe TM, Eddy SR. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:955–64. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.5.0955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pruesse E, Quast C, Knittel K, Fuchs BM, Ludwig W, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:7188–96. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.INFERNAL. Inference of RNA alignments [ http://infernal.janelia.org]
  • 22.Markowitz VM, Mavromatis K, Ivanova NN, Chen IM, Chu K, Kyrpides NC. IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2271–8. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28:2731–9. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Field D, Amaral-Zettler L, Cochrane G, Cole JR, Dawyndt P, Garrity GM, Gilbert J, Glöckner FO, Hirschman L, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Klenk H-P, Knight R, Kottmann R, Kyrpides N, Meyer F, San Gil I, Sansone S-A, Schriml LM, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Ussery DW, White O, Wooley J. The genomic standards consortium. PLoS Biol. 2011;9:e1001088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87:4576–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chen WX, Wang ET, Kuykendall LD. The Proteobacteria. New York: Springer - Verlag; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Validation of publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005, 55:2235-2238. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 28.Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T, Class I. Alphaproteobacteria. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Kreig NR, Staley JT, editors. Bergey‘s manual of systematic bacteriology. Second. New York: Springer - Verlag; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kuykendall LD: Order VI. Rhizobiales. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Kreig NR, Staley JT, editors. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Second. New York: Springer - Verlag; 2005. p. 324. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kuykendall LD: Family I. Rhizobiaceae. In: Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, editors. Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology. 2. New York: Springer; 2005. pp. 324–58. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kuykendall LD, Young JM, Martínez Romero E, Kerr A, Sawada H. Genus I. Rhizobium. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, editors. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Second. New York: Springer - Verlag; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, Harris MA, Hill DP, Issel-Tarver L, Kasarskis A, Lewis S, Matese JC, Richardson JE, Ringwald M, Rubin GM, Sherlock G. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The gene ontology consortium. Nat Genet. 2000;25:25–9. doi: 10.1038/75556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hyatt D, Chen GL, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Reeve W, Ardley J, Tian R, Eshraghi L, Yoon J, Ngamwisetkun P, Seshadri R, Ivanova N, Kyrpides N. A genomic encyclopedia of the root nodule bacteria: Assessing genetic diversity through a systematic biogeographic survey. Stand Genomic Sci. 2015;10:14. doi: 10.1186/1944-3277-10-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Reddy TB, Thomas AD, Stamatis D, Bertsch J, Isbandi M, Jansson J, Mallajosyula J, Pagani I, Lobos EA, Kyrpides NC: The Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD) v.5: a metadata management system based on a four level (meta)genome project classification. Nucleic Acids Res 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 36.Markowitz VM, Chen I-MA, Palaniappan K, Chu K, Szeto E, Pillay M, Ratner A, Huang J, Woyke T, Huntemann M, Anderson I, Billis K, Varghese N, Mavromatis K, Pati A, Ivanova NN, Kyrpides NC. IMG 4 version of the integrated microbial genomes comparative analysis system. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D560–7. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mavromatis K, Land ML, Brettin TS, Quest DJ, Copeland A, Clum A, Goodwin L, Woyke T, Lapidus A, Klenk HP, Cottingham RW, Kyrpides NC. The fast changing landscape of sequencing technologies and their impact on microbial genome assemblies and annotation. PLoS One. 2012;7:e48837. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.CTAB DNA extraction protocol [http://jgi.doe.gov/collaborate-with-jgi/pmo-overview/protocols-sample-preparation-information/]
  • 39.JGI Website [http://www.jgi.doe.gov]
  • 40.Zerbino D, Birney E. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 2008;18:821–9. doi: 10.1101/gr.074492.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.wgsim [https://github.com/lh3/wgsim]
  • 42.Gnerre S, MacCallum I, Przybylski D, Ribeiro FJ, Burton JN, Walker BJ, Sharpe T, Hall G, Shea TP, Sykes S, Berlin AM, Aird D, Costello M, Daza R, Williams L, Nicol R, Gnirke A, Nusbaum C, Lander ES, Jaffe DB. High-quality draft assemblies of mammalian genomes from massively parallel sequence data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:1513–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1017351108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Standards in Genomic Sciences are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES