Abstract
Leaderless translation is prevalent in haloarchaea, with many of these leaderless transcripts possessing short 5’-untranslated regions (UTRs) less than 10 nucleotides. Whereas, little is known about the function of this very short 5’-UTR. Our previous studies determined that just four nucleotides preceded the start codon of hsp70 mRNA in Natrinema sp. J7, with residues -3A and +4G, relative to the A of the ATG start codon, acting as the preferred bases around the start codon of all known haloarchaeal hsp70 genes. Here, we examined the effects of nucleotides flanking the start codon on gene expression. The results revealed that shortening and deletion of the short 5’-UTR enhanced transcript levels; however, it led to significant reductions in overall translational efficiency. AUG was efficiently used as start codons, in both the presence and absence of short 5’-UTRs. GUG also could initiate translation, even though it was so inefficient that it would not be detected without considerably elevated transcript. Nucleotide substitutions at position -4 to +6 were shown to affect gene expression by transcript and/or translational levels. Notably, -3A and A/U nucleotides at position +4~+6 were more optimal for gene expression. Nucleotide transversions of -3A to -3C and +4G to +4T with hsp70 promoter from either Haloferax volcanii DS70 or Halobacterium salinarum NRC-1 showed the same effects on gene expression as that of Natrinema sp. J7. Taken together, our results suggest that the nucleotides flanking the start codon in hsp70 mRNAs with very short 5’-UTRs play an important role in haloarchaeal gene expression.
Introduction
Archaea possess many features distinct from bacteria and eukaryotes. On the one hand, the archaea are prokaryotic organisms closely related to bacteria in morphology and metabolism. On the other hand, many aspects of their informational processes are more related to that of their eukaryotic homologues [1, 2]. For example, the archaeal basal transcription apparatus consists of a single eukaryotic RNA polymerase (RNAP) II-like transcriptase and two general transcription factors, TATA-element binding protein (TBP) and transcription factor B (TFB). TBP and TFB are homologues of the eukaryotic TBP and basal transcription factor TFIIB. Moreover, the archaeal promoter architecture containing the consensus sequence TATA box closely resembles that of the eukaryotic RNAP II promoters in terms of nucleotide sequence, location and function [3].
Like transcription, translation is also a key step in the gene expression process. In the process of translation, translation initiation is a primary determinant of translational efficiency. Most transcripts of protein-coding genes possess a 5’-Untranslated region (UTR) preceding the open reading frame (ORF), which are designated as leadered transcripts. Translation initiation of leadered transcripts in bacteria relies primarily on the Shine–Dalgarno (SD) sequence in the 5’-UTR, located a few nucleotides upstream of the ORF [4]. Meanwhile, the majority of eukaryotic translation initiation of leadered transcripts is driven by a ribosomal scanning mechanism that requires a “cap” at the 5’-end of the processed mRNA; the presence of a Kozak sequence (“GCCRCCAUGG”, where R represents a purine and AUG is the start codon) in the 5’-UTR helps to further enhance eukaryotic translation initiation [5, 6]. In contrast to the leadered transcript, the transcript with a 5’-UTR length less than 10 bp is categorized as leaderless. Because leaderless transcripts occur in all three domains of organisms, it has been proposed that the translation initiation acting on these transcripts might be an evolutionary oldest mechanism [7]. This hypothesis is further supported by a report that leaderless mRNAs are capable of being translated in vitro by bacterial, archaeal and eukaryotic translation systems [8]. However, their translation initiation mechanisms are significantly different from that of leadered mRNA. The translation of leaderless mRNA could be driven not only by 70S or 80S ribosomes, but also 30S subunits free of IF3 [9–12]. 61S ribosomes, induced by kasugamycin, lack several 30S proteins; however, they are also capable of translating leaderless mRNAs [13]. Unlike alternative codons (AUG, GUG and UUG), which can act as start codons in leadered mRNAs, initiation translation of leaderless mRNAs shows a strong dependence on AUG in Escherichia coli and Haloferax volcanii [9, 14–15].
As like bacteria, archaeal translation is directly coupled to transcription, with translation initiation occurring immediately after the beginning of mRNA synthesis [16]. However, the mechanism of translation initiation in archaea is more complex than that of bacteria. SD-dependent translation initiation, analogous to bacterial translation, is only observed in some archaeal transcripts [7, 17]. Many archaeal transcripts are led by SD free 5’-UTR. A “SD-less mechanism” has been proposed as a novel mechanism for leadered transcripts in haloarchaea, albeit its molecular details are still unknown [15, 18]. Furthermore, leaderless mRNAs are particularly prevalent in archaea, comparing with the other two domains [17, 19–20]. Bioinformatic analyses of archaeal genomes predicted that many species contain a high fraction of leaderless transcripts [18, 21].
The growing pool of experimental data and bioinformatic analyses have revealed a lot of leaderless mRNAs containing a very short 5’-UTR. Notably, 13 of 26 Hbt. salinarum leaderless transcripts, and 11 of 15 Hfx. volcanii leaderless transcripts, have also been shown to contain 5’-UTRs less than 10 nucleotides [20]. The studies of leaderless translation to date focus mostly on mRNAs lack of 5’-UTR entirely. Little is known regarding the function of these short 5’-UTRs, as well as the sequences flanking the start codon. The Hsp70 family proteins are a highly conserved group of molecular chaperones and heat shock proteins. Our previous study determined that the 5’-UTR of hsp70 transcript from the haloarchaeon Natrinema sp. J7 had just 4 nucleotides [22]. In this study, to investigate the roles of nucleotides flanking the start codon of the transcript with this very short 5’-UTR on gene expression, we generated a panel of targeted deletions and point mutants. Gene expression was monitored using β-galactosidase gene (bgaH) as a reporter gene [23–24], and the effects of various combinations of native or mutated nucleotides on transcript level and translational efficiency were extensively examined in Hfx. volcanii.
Results
Identification of preferred nucleotides flanking the start codon in haloarchaeal hsp70 genes
The hsp70 gene exists in all reported haloarchaea and is predicted to be a highly expressed gene [25]. As in Natrinema sp. J7, the 5’-UTR of hsp70, determined by RLM-RACE PCR (RNA ligase-mediated rapid amplification of cDNA ends by PCR), was also just 4 nucleotides in Hbt. salinarum NRC-1 and Hfx. volcanii DS70, which suggested that haloarchaeal hsp70 mRNAs were likely to be with very short 5’-UTR. Further analysis of the bases flanking the start codon of hsp70 mRNA in haloarchaea revealed a regular configuration similar to that of Kozak sequences in eukaryotes (Fig 1). Except for two strains with GUG as start codon, only AUG served as the native start codon in other sequenced haloarchaea (S1 Fig). The consensus of 4 bases upstream start codon was also very obvious, especially for strong biases of A at position -3 (the A of the AUG is +1). Because of the conservation of haloarchaeal Hsp70 sequences, the identities of the bases downstream start codon in different haloarchaea were not unexpected. However, the biases of G at position +4 caught our attention, as the +4G was very important in the Kozak sequence.
Usage of alternative start codons on mRNA
Initial experiments to examine the role of the short 5’-UTR prior to bgaH transcript were carried out by constructing two deletion mutants from pTMJ, one that altered the 5’-UTR sequence from 5’-CACG-3’ to 5’-C-3’ (pTMJ-D3), and the other was entirely devoid of the 5’-UTR (pTMJ-D4). In order to analyse the requirement of the start codon in translation, both in the presence and absence of the short 5’-UTR, six mutations were generated from the above three plasmids, changing the bgaH start codon from AUG to GUG and UUG (pTMJ-GUG, pTMJ-UUG, pTMJ-D3-GUG, pTMJ-D3-UUG, pTMJ-D4-GUG and pTMJ-D4-UUG, respectively). Hfx. volcanii strain DS70, which lacks detectable bgaH transcript, as well as β-galactosidase activity [23, 27–28], was chosen as the recipient strain and transformed with these plasmids. Then the bgaH mRNA and β-galactosidase activities in the Hfx. volcanii recombinant strains were quantified simultaneously. Meanwhile, Western blots and Hfx. volcanii transformants sprayed with X-Gal were conducted to ensure of the accuracy of enzymatic analyses (Fig 2). Here the amount of bgaH mRNA and β-galactosidase specific activity (BgaH activity) represented the bgaH transcript level and BgaH protein level, respectively. Translational efficiency was calculated by dividing the protein level with the transcript level. At least three independent experiments were performed in this study.
Whether with the short 5’-UTR or not, altering the start codon from AUG to GUG did not affect the abundance of bgaH transcript; however, the translational efficiency of bgaH mRNA driven by AUG start codon was found to be 5–37 times higher than that of GUG codon. In constructs in which the start codon was mutated to UUG, bgaH transcript levels decreased to less than half that of AUG codons, with no detectable β-galactosidase activity, suggesting that the UUG start codon is incapable of driving the translation of bgaH mRNA (Fig 2).
In constructs harbouring the AUG start codon, removing either the short 5’-UTR or ACG preceding the start codon led the amount of bgaH mRNA and β-galactosidase specific activity to increase. When the start codon was mutated to GUG, deletion of the 5’-UTR also enhanced the bgaH mRNA amount, but resulted in a considerable reduction of β-galactosidase specific activity, especially for the absence of 5’-UTR. We even doubted that the β-galactosidase activity could not be detected if the transcript amount was not increased so much. Whereas, using either AUG or GUG as start codon, both shortening and deletion of the 5’-UTR led the translational efficiency to reduce.
When Hfx. volcanii DS70 transformants were sprayed with X-Gal, colonies in which bgaH expression was driven by the AUG start codon (pTMJ, pTMJ-D3, pTMJ-D4) produced a higher degree of colour change than those containing the GUG start codon (pTMJ-GUG, pTMJ-D3-GUG, pTMJ-D4-GUG) (Fig 2C). As seen in the enzyme assay, colonies containing the UUG start codon (pTMJ-UUG, pTMJ-D3-UUG, pTMJ-D4-UUG) exhibited undetectable levels of β-galactosidase activity. The abundance of BgaH protein was further validated by Western blotting using a polyclonal antibody against BgaH. The results were similar to that of other assays (Fig 2C).
The influence of nucleotide at position -3 on gene expression
Besides start codon AUG, comparative sequence alignments indicated a strong bias for A residue at position -3 upstream of hsp70 start codon in haloarchaea (Fig 1). Kozak reported that an A or G residue at position -3 is necessary for optimal translation initiation in mammalian species [29]. To determine the effect of this preferred nucleotide on gene expression, -3A was mutated to -3G, -3C or -3T (pTMJ-3G, pTMJ-3C and pTMJ-3T, respectively).
Mutation of -3A resulted in severe reductions in both the abundances of bgaH transcript and β-galactosidase specific activity. The -3G mutant retained a translational efficiency ~60% that of the -3A strain. Whereas pyrimidine residues greatly impaired gene expression, the β-galactosidase specific activities of the -3C and -3T mutants were nearly indistinguishable from that of H. volcanii DS70/pTM11. To further determine the role of nucleotides at position -3, an additional plasmid (pTMJ-3D) was constructed in which -3A was deleted from pTMJ, leaving only three bases in the 5’-UTR, and altering the nucleotide at position -3 from -3A to -3C. Compared with the native -3A (pTMJ), the deletion of this residue (pTMJ-3D) did not affect bgaH mRNA abundance; however, it did reduce translational efficiency and β-galactosidase specific activity to around half that of H. volcanii DS70/pTMJ (Fig 3).
The influence of nucleotides preceding the start codon
Besides -3A, the other three bases prior to start codon also displayed biases of C/T at position -4, A/C at position -2 and G at positon -1 (Fig 1 and S1 Fig). To unravel the effects of nucleotides other than -3A on translational efficiency, mutagenesis of the other three bases preceding the start codon was made based on the plasmid pTMJ. The β-galactosidase specific activities, bgaH transcript levels and translational efficiencies of the different derivatives were summarised in Fig 4.
Nucleotide substitution at position -4 led to different degrees of reduction (35%-79%) in transcript level. Changing -4C to -4G or -4T had no effect on translational efficiency, while the translational efficiency of -4A almost increased 2-fold. The -2C substitution showed remarkable changes in both transcript level and translational efficiency. The β-galactosidase specific activity of -2G mutant was undetectable with a 76% reduction in bgaH mRNA amount. Whereas, the translational efficiencies of -2A and -2T increased more than 4-fold and 3-fold, respectively. The mutation at position -1 had no obvious impact on transcript level, but translational efficiencies of all three mutants had different degrees of increase (-1G→-1C: 379%, -1G→-1A: 172%, -1G→-1T: 238%).
The influence of nucleotides downstream the start codon
In order to detect whether the nucleotides downstream of the start codon affect gene expression, we attempted to alter the nucleotides at positions of +4~+6. At first, +4G was changed to +4A, +4C and +4T (pTMJ+4A, pTMJ+4C and pTMJ+4T, respectively). The results showed that mutation of +4G to +4C led the translational efficiency to reduce 2-fold. Whereas, when the +4G was changed to +4A or +4T, translational efficiency rose over 4-fold, along with relatively slight increases in transcript abundance (Fig 5). It implied the nucleotides downstream of the start codon had a significant influence on haloarchaeal gene expression. Then residue +5C was mutated to +5G, +5A or +5T (pTMJ+5G, pTMJ+5A and pTMJ+5T, respectively). As seen in Fig 5, bgaH transcripts and β-galactosidase specific activities increased obviously in all the three mutants. The translational efficiency of +5A increased while the translational efficiency of +5G decreased. Because of codon-degeneracy, altering +6A to +6G did not changed the penultimate amino acid of BgaH, but led the bgaH mRNA and translational efficiency to reduce about 30%. When the penultimate amino acid codon was changed from GCA to AAA, both the bgaH mRNA and β-galactosidase specific activity had a large increase, the translational efficiency also increased 2.4-fold (Fig 5).
The influence of nucleotides at position -3 and +4 in different haloarchaeal hsp70 genes
Since the nucleotides at position -3 and +4 in hsp70 of Hbt. salinarum NRC-1 and Hfx. volcanii DS70 were also -3A and +4G, respectively. To further determine the influence of nucleotides at position -3 and +4 on gene expression, the other two hsp70 promoters from Hfx. volcanii DS70 and Hbt. salinarum NRC-1 were cloned upstream of the bgaH ORF, respectively. They were named as pTM-H and pTM-N. The sequences flanking bgaH start codon at position -4 to +4 were mutated according to that of hsp70 in Hfx. volcanii DS70 and Hbt. salinarum NRC-1, respectively. Then the plasmids pTMH and pTMN were obtained. Nucleotide transversions were made at position -3 and +4 using these two plasmids. The results showed that mutation of -3A to -3C in pTMH led to severe reductions in both bgaH transcript level and β-galactosidase specific actvity, including a 28-fold decrease in translational efficiency. -3C mutation upstream of bgaH ORF in pTMHN reduced the bgaH transcript level to nearly half that of native -3A, along with a nearly 20-fold reduction in translational efficiency. However, +4T substitution either in pTMH or pTMN conferred a remarkable increase in β-galactosidase specific activity and transcript level, even translational efficiency rose significantly (Fig 6).
Discussion
Use of alternative start codons
Though mammalian cells strictly employ AUG as a start codon [30–31], the usage of alternative start codons is rather common in Bacteria and Archaea [32]. For example, 82.0% of genes are initiated with an AUG, 17.8% with a GUG and 0.2% with a UUG in Hfx. volcanii [33]. All three combinations have been shown to act as alternative start codons on leadered transcripts in Bacteria and Archaea, while in haloarchaeal leaderless translation, the usage of start codon appears to be transcript-dependent. AUG was shown to act as the exclusive start codon in Hfx. volcanii leaderless transcript using the dhfr gene as a reporter gene [15]. However, an evidence of a GUC start codon for the initiation of leaderless mRNA translation in Hbt. salinarum showed that alternative codons are possible [34]. Our results revealed that AUG start codon was indeed more efficient than GUG start codon, regardless of the presence or absence of the very short 5’-UTR. However, GUG start codon could also drive bgaH mRNA translation, even though it was very weak (Fig 2).
The effect of the nucleotides in short 5’-UTR
Nakagawa observed a disproportionate number of A/G nucleotides at position -3, relative to the initiation codon, in all 47 eukaryote species examined [35]; replacement of this residue with either a T or C nucleotide strongly impairs translation initiations in mammals [29, 36]. The preferred nucleotide at position -3 in haloarchaeal hsp70 genes was also A residue (Fig 1 and S1 Fig). Although the -3A was essential for the optimal gene expression, deletion of this residue resulted in only a half reduction in translation efficiency (Fig 3). These data suggest that the influence of nucleotides at position -3 is context-dependent.
Besides -3A, the substitution of other bases in the 5’-UTR led the transcript level and protein level to vary with their locations (Fig 4). -4C is the original transcriptional initiation site of hsp70 gene in Natrinema sp. J7. Although altering the -4C to other bases reduced the amount of bgaH mRNA, it did not have obvious influence on translational efficiency. Whereas, changing the -1G to other bases had no obvious influence on the bgaH transcript level, but led the translational efficiency to increase. It seemed that the nucleotides at position -4 just affected transcription, and that the nucleotides at position -1 only influenced translation. The effects of base substitutions at residue -2 were complex. -2A/T may be the optimal nucleotide for hsp70 gene expression in haloarchaea. It was interesting to find that -2G mutant had no detectable β-galactosidase activity. Maybe this is the reason why there was almost no G located at position -2 in haloarchaeal hsp70 (S1 Fig).
The effect of the nucleotides downstream the start codon
Earlier studies indicated that A/U nucleotides downstream of the start codon could increase translation initiation in E. coli [37–38]. Our results of altering the nucleotides at positions of +4~+6 also showed that mutations of C/G to A/U would lead to increase in translational efficiencies in haloarchaea. Notably, when the N-terminal penultimate amino acid codon was altered from GCA to AAA, the β-galactosidase specific activity reached the largest with the large increase of bgaH transcript (Fig 5). Among the nucleotides at positions of +4~+6, the nucleotide at position +4 had a strong influence on the translational efficiency. When nucleotide A or U was located at position +4, the penultimate amino acid codon was mutated to either a threonine codon (ACA) or serine codon (UCA) and resulted in the translational efficiency to rise dramatically. Alternatively, the translational efficiency of the proline codon (CCA) was just one-third that of the control alanine codon (GCA). Compared with the nucleotide at position +4, the nucleotides at position +5 and +6 seemed to have a slight influence on the translational efficiency. It seemed that the importance of +4 residue on translation was related to its location adjacent to the start codon AUG.
The N-terminal penultimate amino acid of BgaH was altered due to the mutations of +4G and +5C to other nucleotides in this study. Post-translation modification is common and able to affect the stability of proteins in haloarchaea [39–40]. Amino acid substitutions of the penultimate glutamine for small and uncharged amino acids in α1 protein influence its post-translation modification, and then lead the protein levels to alter [41]. Thus, the observed BgaH amounts in Fig 5A might be affected by protein stabilities. So far, the information about post-translation modification of BgaH protein is only the removal of the initiating methionine, which is accomplished by methionine aminopeptidases (MAPs). Comparison analyses suggest that the cleavage efficiency of MAPs is conserved in three domains and affected by the penultimate residue [42]. If the penultimate residue has a small radius of gyration, the N-terminal methionine residue can be removed more efficiently. For Hfx. volcanii, MAPs generally cleave nascent proteins when the penultimate residues are small and uncharged amino acids (Glycine, Alanine, Proline, Valine, Serine or Threonine) [39]. In the +4G swap experiment, the penultimate alanine of BgaH and its substitutions (proline, threonine and serine) were small and uncharged amino acids. In addition, the cleavage efficiency of N-terminal methionine is high (nearly 90%-100%) if these four amino acids are in the second position [42]. This should minimize the influence of the penultimate amino acid substitution on the protein stability to a considerable extent in Hfx. volcanii. Therefore, we deemed that the differences of the observed BgaH amounts could reflect the protein levels in Hfx. volcanii. However, much more experimentation is necessary to confirm whether the penultimate amino acid affect the stability of BgaH protein in Hfx. volcanii.
The 5’-UTR and gene expression
Using either AUG or GUG as a start codon, shortening or deletion of the 5’-UTR reduced the translational efficiencies but increased the transcript levels. When GUG was used as start codon, deletion of the very short 5’-UTR led the translational efficiency to decrease sharply (Fig 2). It suggests that the presence of the very short 5’-UTR is more important for GUG to drive translation. Leaderless transcripts containing several nucleotides upstream of the start codon are common in archaea, as well as some primitive eukaryotes [20, 43]. Our results display that the very short 5’-UTR is able to affect the gene expression. The appropriate expression is essential for some genes, especially for hsp70, whose overexpression might cause a defect of the Hsp70 machine and be harmful to cell cycle and survival [44–45]. Therefore, it implies that these very short 5’-UTRs are beneficial for organisms to live, especially in a nutrient limited environment.
Phylogenetic analysis of all reported haloarchaeal strains
Hsp70 as a highly conserved molecular chaperone, the regulation of its gene has been extensively characterised in Bacteria and Eukarya. Although Hsp70 is present in all reported haloarchaea. However, whether conserved elements in the haloarchaeal hsp70 promoters exist, or what role Hsp70 might play in haloarchaea, is unknown [46]. Bioinformatic analysis of the nucleotides flanking the start codon of haloarchaeal hsp70 genes showed that the preferred nucleotides at position -3 and +4 were A and G, respectively. Different nucleotides at position -3 or +4 were observed in 15 of 92 strains included in this study (S1 Fig).
The nucleotide at position -3 is G in Halopiger xanaduensis SH-6. Both Haladaptatus paucihalophilus DX253 and Salinarchaeum sp. Harcht-Bskl have G residue at position +4. Twelve strains harbour different nucleotides at position -3 and +4; two of them use GUG as start codon. To examine the evolutionary relationship between haloarchaeal strains containing hsp70 genes, species were aligned based upon their 16S rDNA sequences using CLUSTALW and visualised using Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis software (MEGA version 5.05; Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ) [47]. Strains with different nucleotides at position -3 and/or +4 of hsp70 genes are concentrated within two groups in the phylogenetic trees (Fig 7). This means that the nucleotide sequences flanking the start codon, each with its own unique function, might evolve over time.
Why some mRNAs contain very short 5’-UTRs of less than 10 nucleotides remains unknown. Here, our studies demonstrate that the nucleotides, flanking the start codons in hsp70 mRNAs with very short 5’-UTRs, play an important role in both transcription and translation. Future studies regarding its effect under specific physiological settings, and the biological significance of these effects on transcription and translation, will provide valuable insights into the mechanisms of translation initiation and the evolution of this process.
Materials and Methods
Micro-organisms, media and growth conditions
Hfx. volcanii DS70 and Hbt. salinarum NRC-1 were kindly provided by Professors Thorsten Allers and Shiladitya DasSarma, respectively. The Natrinema sp. J7 strain was grown in 20% (salt, w/v) modified growth medium (MGM) at 45°C [22], while Hfx. volcanii and Hbt. salinarum NRC-1 were cultivated aerobically in 18% (salt, w/v) MGM at 45°C. Cultures were supplemented with 0.3 μg ml-1 novobiocin to select for resident plasmids. E. coli strains DH5α and JM110 were used as hosts for cloning vectors. The strains were grown in Luria–Bertani medium at 37°C, and ampicillin was added at 100 μg ml-1 when appropriate.
Bioinformatic analysis of the nucleotide sequences flanking the start codon
Sequenced haloarchaeal hsp70 genes were searched and downloaded from NCBI. So far, 92 hsp70 sequences were collected in total. As the first base of start codon was defined as position +1, the sequences from -10 to +10 of all hsp70 genes were retrieved and aligned to obtain the sequence logo of the flank region of translation start codon using Weblogo 3, version 2.8.2 [26].
Plasmid construction
All plasmids used in this study and their characteristic features are summarised in S1 Table. The oligonucleotides used for plasmid construction are listed in S2 Table.
The hsp70 promoter of Hbt. salinarum NRC-1 was amplified using PCR primers NRC-pro-f and NRC-pro-r, each of which contained two restriction sites: NsiI and BglII in the upstream primer, and NcoI and NotI in the downstream primer. The PCR product then was cloned into shuttle vector pTA230 using NsiI and NotI enzymes; the resulting plasmid was digested with SspI/BamHI and then ligated with the SmaI/BamHI-digested product of plasmid pMLH32, which contained the gyrB gene. The resulting plasmid was designated pTM11. Using pMLH32 as a template, the bgaH gene was amplified using primers bgaH-f and bgaH-r, and was inserted into pTM11 using NcoI and BamHI. The resulting plasmid was named pTM-N. Next, the plasmid was digested with BglII and NcoI, and the hsp70 promoter of pTM-N was replaced with the hsp70 promoter fragment of Hfx. volcanii DS70 and Natrinema sp. J7 in plasmids pTM-H and pTM-J, respectively.
pTMJ was constructed using plasmid pTM-J as a template. To maintain the same upstream sequence and +4G as that of Natrinema sp. J7 hsp70, the NcoI site (CCATGG) of pTM-J was changed to CGATGG in pTMJ. Using two pairs of primers, two different PCR fragments were generated, which comprised the promoter of hsp70, the 5’-terminal sequence of hsp70 transcripts (-4~+4) and a partial bgaH gene, respectively. These two PCR fragments were purified and fused into one fragment via overlapping PCR using primers J7 pro-f and Kozak-R2. The resulting PCR fragment was purified, digested with BglII and KpnI and used to replace an equivalent length fragment in pTM-J; the resulting plasmid was named pTMJ. Similarly, plasmids pTMH and pTMN were constructed based on plasmids pTM-H and pTM-N, respectively. The NcoI site (CCATGG) of the corresponding plasmids was changed to AGATGG in pTMH and ACATGG in pTMN, respectively. Using the same method, a series of plasmids carrying the point mutation and deletion mutation were constructed based on the corresponding plasmids.
Determination of bgaH transcript levels
Total RNA was isolated from log-phase cultures (OD600 = 1.0–1.5) using the TRIzol Max Bacterial RNA Isolation Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. DNase treatment and reverse transcription were performed using the PrimeScript RT reagent kit with gDNA eraser (Perfect Real Time; TaKaRa, Dalian, China). The reaction mixture contained less than 1 μg RNA in a final volume of 20 μl. Real-time PCR was carried out using TaKaRa SYBR Premix Ex Taq (TaKaRa); quantitative PCR samples contained 2.0 μl diluted cDNA, and 10 μM each of forward and reverse primers in a final volume of 20 μl. Reactions were conducted using a StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) under the following conditions: 95°C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 5 s and 60°C for 30 s. Each reaction was done in triplicate. To detect any possible DNA contamination, cDNA was replaced with DNase-treated RNA.
16S rRNA transcript levels were used as an internal control using primer pair 16S rRNA–RT-f and 16S rRNA–RT-r. Real-time PCR results were analysed using the ΔΔCt method [48]. The Ct levels of the control transcripts 16S rRNA were used to normalise Ct levels of the bgaH transcripts. The bgaH level of the chromosomal gene copy was determined by Hfx. volcanii DS70/ pTM11.
β-galactosidase assay and translational efficiency analysis
3 μl culture of Hfx. volcanii transformants (OD600 = 1.0) were dropped on 18% MGM solid medium and cultivated for 5 days at 45°C. A solution of X-Gal in dimethyl formamide (10 mg ml-1) was then sprayed on colonies using a hand-atomiser (perfume spray bottle) and the plates were incubated at room temperature for 2 h [49].
β-Galactosidase specific activity in cell lysates was measured using the ONPG assay, as described by Holmes et al. [50]. The protein concentration was determined by a Bradford assay using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a standard. Translational efficiencies were calculated by dividing the β-galactosidase specific activities with the transcript levels. At least three independent experiments for all analyses were performed, and average values and standard deviations were calculated.
Western blot analysis
Cells were grown at 45°C until the mid-logarithmic growth phase; then the protein concentration was determined by the Bradford assay method. Western blot analysis was performed using 2 μg total protein, resolved on a 10% acrylamide gel and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane using a Transblot cell (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). The membrane was then incubated with polyclonal anti-BgaH rabbit antiserum (1:1000 dilution). Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Millipore, Billerica, MA) was used as a secondary antibody (1:10000 dilution). Immunoblots were developed with SuperSignal West Pico Substrate (Pierce, Rockford, IL).
Phylogenetic analysis of haloarchaeal 16S rDNA
The 16S rDNA sequences of all reported haloarchaea (DQ874620, AB663462, AB663460, AB663463, AB663465, AB663449, NR 102444, AB663448, NR 074238, AB663445, AB663472, NR 029124, AB663454, AB663455, AB663476, AB663474, NR 028147, NR 074183, AB663456, AB663457, NR 102918, NR 102442, NR 028201, AB663436, NR 028169, AB663452, NR 102445, AB663468, AB663469, NR 102453, NR 103951, NR 102920, NR 040777, NR 043474, NR 043387, AB663372, NR 043744, NR 102892, AB663429, HM165235, NR 074200, NR 043987, AB663377, NR 028212, NR 043988, NR 028204, AB663381, D13378, AB081732, NR 028215, AB663373, NR 074218, NR 044108, NR 074206, AJ586107, JQ346761, NR 044337, AB605776, NR 102900, AB663358, EF645684, D14130, NR 044335, AB477984, NR 074201, NR 074204, AB663363, AH000908, NR 102519, NR 074179, NR 074194, AB663415, X82167, AB663413, AB663402, AB663416, AB663421, JQ936845, AB663406, AB663405, AB663409, D63572, AB663422) were downloaded from NCBI and aligned using the CLUSTALW multiple sequence alignment programme for Windows XP. Phylogenetic analysis was conducted using Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis software (MEGA version 5.05) [47]. Trees were constructed by neighbour-joining using the p-distance method. Bootstrap values were calculated based on 1000 computer-generated trees.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank Thorsten Allers and Mike L. Dyall-Smith for kindly providing the strain Hfx. volcanii DS70, plasmid pTA230 and pMLH32, respectively. We also sincerely thank Shiladitya DasSarma for giving the strain Hbt. salinarum NRC-1.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was funded by National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (2011CB808800), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30970070 and 30870133).
References
- 1. Allers T, Mevarech M. Archaeal genetics—the third way. Nat Rev Genet. 2005; 6: 58–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Reeve JN, Schmitz RA. Biology, biochemistry and the molecular machinery of Archaea. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2005; 8: 627–629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Bartlett MS. Determinants of transcription initiation by archaeal RNA polymerase. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2005; 8: 677–684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Shine J, Dalgarno L. Determinant of cistron specificity in bacterial ribosomes. Nature. 1975; 254: 34–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Kozak M. Possible role of flanking nucleotides in recognition of the AUG initiator codon by eukaryotic ribosomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981; 9: 5233–5252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Kozak M. An analysis of 5'-noncoding sequences from 699 vertebrate messenger RNAs. Nucleic acids Res. 1987; 15: 8125–8148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Malys N, McCarthy JE. Translation initiation: variations in the mechanism can be anticipated. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2011; 68: 991–1003. 10.1007/s00018-010-0588-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Grill S, Gualerzi CO, Londei P, Bläsi U. Selective stimulation of translation of leaderless mRNA by initiation factor 2: evolutionary implications for translation. EMBO J. 2000; 19: 4101–4110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. O'Donnell SM, Janssen GR. Leaderless mRNAs bind 70S ribosomes more strongly than 30S ribosomal subunits in Escherichia coli . J Bacterial. 2002; 184: 6730–6733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Moll I, Grill S, Gualerzi CO, Bläsi U. Leaderless mRNAs in bacteria: surprises in ribosomal recruitment and translational control. Mol Microbiol. 2002; 43: 239–246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Moll I, Hirokawa G, Kiel MC, Kaji A, Bläsi U. Translation initiation with 70S ribosomes: an alternative pathway for leaderless mRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004; 32: 3354–3363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Andreev DE, Terenin IM, Dunaevsky YE, Dmitriev SE, Shatsky IN. A leaderless mRNA can bind to mammalian 80S ribosomes and direct polypeptide synthesis in the absence of translation initiation factors. Mol Cell Biol. 2006; 26: 3164–3169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kaberdina AC, Szaflarski W, Nierhaus KH, Moll I. An unexpected type of ribosomes induced by kasugamycin: a look into ancestral times of protein synthesis? Mol Cell. 2009; 33: 227–236. 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.12.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Van Etten WJ, Janssen GR. An AUG initiation codon, not codon–anticodon complementarity, is required for the translation of unleadered mRNA in Escherichia coli . Mol Microbiol. 1998; 27: 987–1001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Hering O, Brenneis M, Beer J, Suess B, Soppa J. A novel mechanism for translation initiation operates in haloarchaea. Mol Microbiol. 2009; 71: 1451–1463. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06615.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. French SL, Santangelo TJ, Beyer AL, Reeve JN. Transcription and translation are coupled in Archaea. Mol Biol Evol. 2007; 24: 893–895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Tolstrup N, Sensen CW, Garrett RA, Clausen IG. Two different and highly organized mechanisms of translation initiation in the archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus . Extremophiles. 2000; 4: 175–179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Kramer P, Gäbel K, Pfeiffer F, Soppa J. Haloferax volcanii, a prokaryotic species that does not use the Shine Dalgarno mechanism for translation initiation at 5′-UTRs. PLoS One. 2014; 9: e94979 10.1371/journal.pone.0094979 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Slupska MM, King AG, Fitz-Gibbon S, Besemer J, Borodovsky M, Miller JH. Leaderless transcripts of the crenarchaeal hyperthermophile Pyrobaculum aerophilum . J Mol Biol. 2001; 309: 347–360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Brenneis M, Hering O, Lange C, Soppa J. Experimental characterization of Cis-acting elements important for translation and transcription in halophilic archaea. PLoS Genet. 2007; 3: e229 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Wurtzel O, Sapra R, Chen F, Zhu Y, Simmons BA, Sorek R. A single-base resolution map of an archaeal transcriptome. Genome Res. 2010; 20: 133–141. 10.1101/gr.100396.109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Zhang H, Cui P, Lin L, Shen P, Tang B, Huang YP. Transcriptional analysis of the hsp70 gene in a haloarchaeon Natrinema sp. J7 under heat and cold stress. Extremophiles. 2009; 13: 669–678. 10.1007/s00792-009-0251-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Holmes ML, Dyall-Smith ML. Sequence and expression of a halobacterial β-galactosidase gene. Mol Microbiol. 2000; 36: 114–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Patenge N, Haase A, Bolhuis H, Oesterhelt D. The gene for a halophilic β-galactosidase (bgaH) of Haloferax alicantei as a reporter gene for promoter analyses in Halobacterium salinarum . Mol Microbiol. 2000; 36: 105–113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Karlin S, Mrázek J, Ma J, Brocchieri L. Predicted highly expressed genes in archaeal genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102: 7303–7308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Crooks GE, Hon G, Chandonia JM, Brenner SE. WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res. 2004; 14: 1188–1190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Wendoloski D, Ferrer C, Dyall-Smith ML. A new simvastatin (mevinolin)-resistance marker from Haloarcula hispanica and a new Haloferax volcanii strain cured of plasmid pHV2. Microbiology. 2001; 147: 959–964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Lu Q, Han J, Zhou L, Coker JA, DasSarma P, DasSarma S, et al. Dissection of the regulatory mechanism of a heat-shock responsive promoter in haloarchaea: a new paradigm for general transcription factor directed archaeal gene regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008; 36: 3031–3042. 10.1093/nar/gkn152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Kozak M. Point mutations define a sequence flanking the AUG initiator codon that modulates translation by eukaryotic ribosomes. Cell. 1986; 44: 283–292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Peabody DS. Translation initiation at non-AUG triplets in mammalian cells. J Biol Chem. 1989; 264: 5031–5035. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Kozak M. Context effects and inefficient initiation at non-AUG codons in eucaryotic cell-free translation systems. Mol Cell Biol. 1989; 9: 5073–5080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Torarinsson E, Klenk HP, Garrett RA. Divergent transcriptional and translational signals in Archaea. Environ Microbiol. 2005; 7: 47–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Hartman AL, Norais C, Badger JH, Delmas S, Haldenby S, Madupu R, et al. The complete genome sequence of Haloferax volcanii DS2, a model archaeon. PLoS One. 2010; 5: e9605 10.1371/journal.pone.0009605 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Srinivasan G, Krebs MP, RajBhandary UL. Translation initiation with GUC codon in the archaeon Halobacterium salinarum: implications for translation of leaderless mRNA and strict correlation between translation initiation and presence of mRNA. Mol Microbiol. 2006; 59: 1013–1024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Nakagawa S, Niimura Y, Gojobori T, Tanaka H, Miura KI. Diversity of preferred nucleotide sequences around the translation initiation codon in eukaryote genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008; 36: 861–871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Kozak M. Initiation of translation in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Gene. 1999; 234: 187–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Stenström CM, Isaksson LA. Influences on translation initiation and early elongation by the messenger RNA region flanking the initiation codon at the 3′ side. Gene. 2002; 288: 1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Qing G, Xia B, Inouye M. Enhancement of translation initiation by A/T-rich sequences downstream of the initiation codon in Escherichia coli . J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003; 6: 133–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Eichler J, Maupin-Furlow J. Post-translation modification in Archaea: Lessons from Haloferax volcanii and other haloarchaea. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2013; 37(4): 583–606. 10.1111/1574-6976.12012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Falb M, Aivaliotis M, Garcia-Rizo C, Bisle B, Tebbe A, Klein C, et al. Archaeal N-terminal Protein Maturation Commonly Involves N-terminal Acetylation: A Large-scale Proteomics Survey. J Mol Biol. 2006; 362: 915–924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Humbard MA, Zhou G, Maupin-Furlow JA. The N-terminal penultimate residue of 20S proteasome α1 influences its Nα-acetylation and protein levels as well as growth rate and stress responses of Haloferax volcanii . J Bacteriol. 2009; 191: 3794–3803. 10.1128/JB.00090-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Helbig AO, Gauci S, Raijmakers R, Breukelen B, Slijper M, Mohammed S, et al. Profiling of N-Acetylated Protein Termini Provides In-depth Insights into the N-terminal Nature of the Proteome. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 2010; 95: 928–939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Li L, Wang CC. Capped mRNA with a single nucleotide leader is optimally translated in a primitive eukaryote, Giardia lamblia . J Biol Chem. 2004; 279: 14656–14664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Blum P, Ory J, Bauernfeind J, Krska J. Physiological consequences of DnaK and DnaJ overproduction in Escherichia coli . J Bacteriol. 1992; 174: 7436–7444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Sugimoto S, Saruwatari K, Higashi C, Sonomoto K. The proper ratio of GrpE to DnaK is important for protein quality control by the DnaK–DnaJ–GrpE chaperone system and for cell division. Microbiology. 2008; 154: 1876–1885. 10.1099/mic.0.2008/017376-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Hickey AJ, de Macario EC, Macario AJ. Transcription in the archaea: Basal factors, regulation, and stress gene expression. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2002; 37: 537–599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011; 28: 2731–2739. 10.1093/molbev/msr121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001; 25: 402–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Gregor D, Pfeifer F. Use of a halobacterial bgaH reporter gene to analyse the regulation of gene expression in halophilic archaea. Microbiology. 2001; 147: 1745–1754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Holmes ML, Scopes RK, Moritz RL, Simpson RJ, Englert C, Pfeifer F, et al. Purification and analysis of an extremely halophilic β -galactosidase from Haloferax alicantei . Biochim Biophys Acta. 1997; 1337: 276–286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.