Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Leukemia. 2015 Mar 19;29(10):2113–2116. doi: 10.1038/leu.2015.81

Next generation sequencing reveals clinically actionable molecular markers in myeloid sarcoma

Zejuan Li 1, Friedrich Stölzel 5, Kenan Onel 2, Madina Sukhanova 3, M Kamran Mirza 4, Kai Lee Yap 3, Olesya Borinets 3, Richard A Larson 3, Wendy Stock 3, Mark M Sasaki 2, Loren Joseph 4, Gordana Raca 3
PMCID: PMC4575593  NIHMSID: NIHMS664592  PMID: 25787914

Letter to the Editor

Myeloid sarcoma (MS) is a rare hematological neoplasm characterized by the extramedullary proliferation of myeloid blasts disrupting the normal architecture of the affected tissue1. It can occur in any organ, but is particularly common in the skin, gastrointestinal tract, lymph nodes, and bone. MS is most often found in patients with previously or recently recognized acute myeloid leukemia (AML) but may occasionally present in the absence of detectable peripheral blood (PB) or bone marrow (BM) involvement (isolated MS). Aberrant tropism of leukemic blasts for extramedullary tissues is poorly understood. Homing of tumor cells is determined by the complex interplay of factors including the expression of chemokine receptors and adhesion molecules, which are themselves controlled by genetic and epigenetic mechanisms. One may hypothesize that MS may differ in its genetic profile from typical AML, and that specific genetic abnormalities increase the tendency of MS cells to home outside of the BM.

Conventional cytogenetic analysis is rarely performed for MS, since it is frequently mistaken for a solid tumor at the time of diagnosis, and samples appropriate for cytogenetic analysis are not collected. Molecular testing thus may be especially important for the diagnosis and treatment of MS. Still, no comprehensive mutation analysis has been conducted in MS, and mutations have only been studied in a limited number of cases, and in a few selected genes such as FLT3 and NPM1 2-3.

Formalin-fixed-paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue is frequently the only sample type available from MS, but performing extensive mutation screening using DNA from FFPE MS tissue is technically challenging, and has not been previously attempted. The lack of information about molecular pathogenesis is particularly evident for MS which presents as an isolated lesion, so that concurrent or subsequent BM and PB leukemia cannot be sampled for cytogenetic and molecular studies. We performed next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based mutation analysis in 6 cases of isolated MS, to test the feasibility of systematic, comprehensive mutation testing using DNA from FFPE MS tissue, and to evaluate cases of isolated MS for the presence of mutations implicated in typical AML. Our analysis revealed the presence of mutations in a broad spectrum of AML and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)-associated genes and pathways in isolated MS.

Diagnostic FFPE tumor samples were obtained from six patients with isolated MS seen at the University of Chicago Hospital (UCH) or the Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden. At both institutions these studies were approved by their respective institutional review boards. Tumor DNA was extracted from FFPE MS tissue, while germline DNA was obtained from remission BM samples. DNA isolation was performed using the Qiagen DNA extraction kits (Qiagen Inc Valencia, CA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. NGS was performed using the Ion Torrent platform (Life Technologies), according to the manufacturer’s specifications. Tumor DNA was sequenced with a custom design panel that targets 21 AML and MDS-associated genes, DNMT3A, PDGFRA, KIT, NPM1, WT1, FLT3, TP53, RUNX1, MPL, SF3B1, IDH1, GATA2, TET2, EZH2, JAK2, CBL, ETV6, IDH2, ASXL1, ZRSR2 and UTX. The variants detected by NGS were confirmed by Sanger sequencing (primers available in the Supplementary table 2), using the BigDye® Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing chemistry together with automated capillary gel electrophoresis on the ABI 3730xl instrument (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). The available clinical and pathology data for the six studied cases are summarized in Table 1. Cytogenetic information was available for only two cases. Molecular testing for FLT3-ITD and NPM1 mutations was performed previously for four patients, and Case 1 was found to be positive for mutations in both genes (Table 1, Supplemental Figure S1). NGS of 21 genes frequently mutated in AML and MDS identified a total of 12 non-synonymous sequence variants in 8 genes (Table 2, Supplemental Table S1 and Supplemental Figure S2). Among these variants, eight have been reported in the Catalogue Of Somatic Mutations in Cancer database (COSMIC)4, while others have not been described previously. Testing of DNA from BM samples obtained at the time of remission confirmed the absence of the previously unreported variants in the patients’ germline DNA, confirming that they were acquired mutations in leukemia cells (Table 2, Supplemental Figure S3).

Table 1.

Summary of available demographic, pathology and laboratory data for six cases of MS without PB and BM involvement.

Case Age/Sex Tumor location Histopathology, flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry of the mass Conventional cytogenetics Clinically tested molecular mutations
1 61/F left breast lump Sheets of blasts with high N:C ratio, vesicular chromatin, and prominent nucleoli in a background of geographic necrosis. Consistent with MS with monocytic/myelomonocytic differentiation. CD45 (dim), CD34 (partial), CD13, CD33+, CD117+, CD15+, CD7+, and HLA-DR+. Strong immunoreactivity for CD68 and lysozyme with focal positivity for CD117 and CD34. Scattered MPO positivity. CD20 and CD3 negative. not available FLT3-ITD present; NPM1 mutation present
2 40/F clavicle Sheets of blasts with vesicular chromatin. CD45+, CD33+, CD43+, MPO+, CD68+, CD34-, CD56-, CD14-. Negative for cytokeratin, AE1/AE3, CAM 5.2, EMA, S100, TLE1, PAX5, CD20, CD3 and CD5. not available No FLT3-ITD; No NPM1 mutation
3 24/M mediastinal mass Consistent with MS. Strong aberrant CD56 and CD7 expression. not available No FLT3-ITD; No NPM1 mutation
4 38/F small bowel Extensive infiltration of small bowel by intermediate to large sized blast cells with variably prominent nucleoli, extending from the mucosal to the serosal surface. Eosinophilic myelocytes noted throughout the biopsies, consistent with MS, FAB M4eo. Positive for CD45 (leukocyte common antigen), CD34 and CD33. Strong expression of MPO, CD43 and CD117. Scattered TdT positive cells, no expression of B- or T-cell markers. 46, XX, inv(16)(p13.1q22)[7]/47, idem, +22[7]/46, XX[7] No FLT3-ITD
5 73/M scrotum Diffuse proliferation of medium sized cells with a high mitotic rate and blast-like appearance with fine chromatin; findings consistent with MS with expression of monocytic markers. Blasts with a monocytic profile: CD15+, CD11b+, CD13+, CD33+, HLA-DR+, CD38+, CD56+; 20% of cells coexpressed CD15 and CD34 by flow cytometry. The cells revealed immunoreactivity for CD43 and vimentin, lysozyme, CD14 (weak) and CD68, and were negative for B- and T-cell markers, CD117 and MPO. 47, XY, +8[20] NT
6 76/M testis Infiltration by blastoid cells of the testis, epididymis, rete testis and proximal spermatic cord into the tunica albuginea, with a negative tumor margin in the spermatic cord. Positive for CD33 and CD68 and negative for CD20 and CD79a. not available NT

N:C- nuclear-cytoplasmic; FISH- Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization; CN-LOH-copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity; ITD-internal tandem duplication; NT-not tested

Table 2.

Summary of gene mutations identified by next generation sequencing

Patient ID Gene Sequence variant Protein alteration Variant frequency Known mutation Absent in germline DNA
Case 1 FLT3 c.1805_1806ins25 p.K602Nfs*5 40.71 Yes -
NPM1 c.860_863dup p.Y288Cfs*12 25.99 Yes -
WT1 c.1137dup p.R380Tfs*5 35.72 No Yes

Case 2 SF3B1 c.1868A>G p. Y623C 41.13 Yes -
KIT c.1621A>C p. M541L 53.15 Yes No

Case 3 EZH2 c.1711T>C p. C571R 26.9 No Yes
EZH2 c.893G>A p. R298H 20.89 No Yes
KIT c.1621A>C p. M541L 54.87 Yes No

Case 4 FLT3 c.1737_1738insAGG p.V579_Q580insR 37.79 No Yes
KIT c.1621A>C p. M541L 47.07 Yes No

Case 5 FLT3 c.2503G>C p. D835H 42.86 Yes -
NPM1 c.863_864insCAGG p.W288Cfs*12 35.03 Yes -

Case 6 ASXL1 c.1816C>T p. R606W 52.05 Yes -
TET2 c.4879C>T p. Q1627* 47.8 Yes -
KIT c.1621A>C p. M541L 50.55 Yes No

Our study validated the reported high frequency of FLT3 and NPM1 mutations in MS 2-3. We confirmed the presence of FLT3-ITD and NPM1 mutations detected by routine clinical laboratory testing in Case 1. In addition, an NPM1 mutation together with the FLT3 D835H (FLT3-TKD) mutation was detected in Case 5, while Case 4 presented with a three nucleotide insertion in FLT3, but was negative for an NPM1 mutation. NPM1 and FLT3 mutations have clear prognostic significance in AML, and their detection at the time of diagnosis is critical for proper risk stratification and clinical management5.

A missense variant in the KIT gene, resulting in a replacement of the amino acid leucine at codon 541 with a methionine (M541L), was found in 4 out of 6 patients (Table 2). This variant is reported as a benign polymorphism in dbSNP with a frequency of 6.4% in general population (rs3822214), but has also been described as a somatic mutation in COSMIC (COSM28026), in association with a variety of tumors including aggressive fibromatosis6, meningiomas7, and chronic myeloid leukemia8. In all four patients sequence analysis revealed that the M541L variant was present in the germline (Table 2, Supplementary Figure S4). Although it is likely that this polymorphism is benign, some studies suggest that the KIT M541L variant may confer increased risk for hematologic malignancies9. The high frequency of the M541L allele in our cohort may suggest that this variant warrants further investigation in MS.

We detected mutations that affect several molecular pathways implicated in AML pathogenesis, including epigenetic regulation and RNA splicing.

Two patients had mutations in epigenetic-modifying genes (TET2, ASXL1 and EZH2) (Table 2, Supplemental Table S1). Case 6 had mutations in both TET2 and ASXL1. TET2 alters the epigenome through modulation of hydroxymethylation on DNA, while ASXL1 functions as an ubiquitinase component of the polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) which initiates dimethylation and trimethylation of lysine 27 of histone H3 (H3K27)10. ASXL1and TET2 mutations have been frequently observed in MDS, AML and other hematological malignancies, and have been associated with unfavorable outcome10. Case 3 had two novel heterozygous missense mutations, R298H and C571R, in the EZH2 gene. EZH2 is a histone methyltransferase and constitutes a catalytic unit of the PRC210. The two detected mutations are located in the highly conserved domain II and the cysteine-rich domain (CXC) of the protein, which is required for histone methyl transferase (HMT) activity10. Monoallelic or biallelic loss of function mutations in EZH2 have been described in myeloid malignancies, most commonly in MDS, CMML, primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and AML10. Correlative studies have demonstrated that EZH2 mutations associate with adverse outcome in MDS, PMF and AML10.

Case 2 carried a mutation in the SF3B1 gene. SF3B1 is one of the most commonly mutated genes in MDS, particularly in Refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts (RARS)11. However, mutations in SF3B1 and other genes involved in regulation of splicing have also been implicated in AML pathogenesis11-12. A novel frameshift mutation in the WT1 tumor suppressor gene was observed in Case 1, which also presented with FLT3 and NPM1 mutations. The WT1 frameshift mutation leads to the formation of a premature stop codon and a truncated protein lacking the C-terminal zinc fingers. WT1 mutations have been reported in 10–22 % of cases of cytogenetically normal AML13, and are known to co-occur with FLT3 and NPM1 mutations13. Recent studies have shown promising responses in patients with AML by using a WT1 peptide vaccine to induce WT1-specific immune responses14.

In summary, we successfully performed NGS of 21 AML-associated genes using DNA from 6 FFPE MS samples, thus demonstrating the feasibility of performing comprehensive mutation analysis for MS in research and clinical settings. Our study confirmed the previously reported frequent occurrence of FLT3 and NPM1 mutations in MS, and identified mutations in a broad spectrum of other AML associated genes. The mutated genes belong to several functional categories shown previously to be significant in AML, including tyrosine kinases (FLT3 and KIT), tumor suppressors (WT1), epigenetic modifiers (TET2, ASXL1 and EZH2) and spliceosome proteins (SF3B1). Multiple mutations were observed in the same patients, consistent with the notion that a single mutation is not sufficient to engender malignant transformation. The identification of mutations in the genes with a variety of cellular functions in MS patients provides novel insight into molecular pathogenesis of MS, which appears to overlap with pathogenesis of typical AML arising in the bone marrow. As the molecular diagnostics of AML moves towards comprehensive NGS-based testing for prognostically important or targetable genetic abnormalities in large panels of genes, our results suggest that the same approach may be feasible and warranted for MS. In addition, the unusual tropism of the MS blasts for extramedullary tissues may be based on unique subsets of genetic abnormalities that distinguish MS from AML with classical presentation. Future whole exome and whole genome sequencing studies to identify mutations specific for MS may be helpful in elucidating molecular mechanisms that underlie homing and proliferation of leukemia cells outside of the tissue of origin, resulting in systemic disease.

Supplementary Material

1

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the American Cancer Society Institutional Research Grant (#IRG-58-004) and the University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center Support Grant (#P30 CA14599).

Footnotes

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

ZL, MS, MKM, KLY and OB performed the experiments. FS, RL, WS and KO contributed patient samples and clinical data. ZL, MS, FS, KO, LJ and GR analyzed and interpreted the data. ZL, FS, KO and GR wrote the paper. GR designed and coordinated the research study.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary information is available on Leukemia’s website.

References

  • 1.Vardiman JW, Thiele J, Arber DA, Brunning RD, Borowitz MJ, Porwit A, et al. The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes. Blood. 2009;114:937–951. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-03-209262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ansari-Lari MA, Yang CF, Tinawi-Aljundi R, Cooper L, Long P, Allan RH, et al. FLT3 mutations in myeloid sarcoma. Br J Haematol. 2004;126:785–791. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.05124.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Falini B, Lenze D, Hasserjian R, Coupland S, Jaehne D, Soupir C, et al. Cytoplasmic mutated nucleophosmin (NPM) defines the molecular status of a significant fraction of myeloid sarcomas. Leukemia. 2007;21:1566–70. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bamford S, Dawson E, Forbes S, Clements J, Pettett R, Dogan A, et al. The COSMIC (Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer) database and website. Br J Cancer. 2004;91:355–358. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rollig C, Bornhauser M, Thiede C, Taube F, Kramer M, Mohr B, et al. Long-term prognosis of acute myeloid leukemia according to the new genetic risk classification of the European LeukemiaNet recommendations: evaluation of the proposed reporting system. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2758–2765. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.8500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dufresne A, Bertucci F, Penel N, Le Cesne A, Bui B, Tubiana-Hulin M, et al. Identification of biological factors predictive of response to imatinib mesylate in aggressive fibromatosis. Br J Cancer. 2010;103:482–485. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Saini M, Jha AN, Abrari A, Ali S. Expression of proto-oncogene KIT is up-regulated in subset of human meningiomas. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:212. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Inokuchi K, Yamaguchi H, Tarusawa M, Futaki M, Hanawa H, Tanosaki S, et al. Abnormality of c-kit oncoprotein in certain patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia--potential clinical significance. Leukemia. 2002;16:170–177. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Foster R, Byrnes E, Meldrum C, Griffith R, Ross G, Upjohn E, et al. Association of paediatric mastocytosis with a polymorphism resulting in an amino acid substitution (M541L) in the transmembrane domain of c-KIT. Br J Dermatol. 2008;159:1160–1169. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08827.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shih AH, Abdel-Wahab O, Patel JP, Levine RL. The role of mutations in epigenetic regulators in myeloid malignancies. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12:599–612. doi: 10.1038/nrc3343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Braggio E, Egan JB, Fonseca R, Stewart AK. Lessons from next-generation sequencing analysis in hematological malignancies. Blood Cancer J. 2013;3:e127. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2013.26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cancer Genome Atlas Research N. Genomic and epigenomic landscapes of adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:2059–2074. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1301689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gaidzik VI, Schlenk RF, Moschny S, Becker A, Bullinger L, Corbacioglu A, et al. Prognostic impact of WT1 mutations in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia: a study of the German-Austrian AML Study Group. Blood. 2009;113:4505–4511. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-10-183392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Casalegno-Garduno R, Schmitt A, Schmitt M. Clinical peptide vaccination trials for leukemia patients. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2011;10:785–799. doi: 10.1586/erv.11.56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES