Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Jun 6;93(2):436–443. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.05.049

A Preliminary Study on Racial Differences in HMOX1, NFE2L2 and TGFβ1 Gene Polymorphisms and Radiation Induced Late Normal Tissue Toxicity

Asim Alam 1, Nitai D Mukhopadhyay 1, Yi Ning 1, Leonid B Reshko 1, Robert JG Cardnell 1, Omair Alam 1, Christopher S Rabender 1, Vasily A Yakovlev 1, Linda Walker 1, Mitchell S Anscher 1, Ross B Mikkelsen 1
PMCID: PMC4575610  NIHMSID: NIHMS698276  PMID: 26238954

Abstract

Purpose

This study tests whether racial differences in genetic polymorphisms of four genes involved in wound repair and response to radiation can be used to predict the occurrence of normal tissue late effects of radiotherapy and indicate potential therapeutic targets.

Methods and Materials

This prospective study examines genetic polymorphisms that modulate the expression of four genes involved in inflammation and fibrosis and response to radiation (HMOX1, NFE2L2, NOS3 and TGFβ1). DNA from blood samples of 179 patients (~80% breast and head and neck) collected at the time of diagnosis by their radiation oncologist as exhibiting late normal tissue toxicity was used for the analysis. Patient demographics were: 56% Caucasian, 43% African-American, 1% other. Allelic frequencies of the different polymorphisms of the participants were compared to those of the general American population stratified by race. Twenty-six additional patients treated with radiation, but without toxicity at 3 months or later post-therapy, were also analyzed.

Results

Increased frequency of a long GT repeat in the HMOX1 promoter was associated with late effects in both African-American and Caucasian populations. The single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) rs1800469 in the TGFβ1 promoter and the rs6721961 SNP in the NFE2L2 promoter were also found to significantly associate with late effects in African-Americans but not Caucasians. A combined analysis of these polymorphisms revealed that >90% of African-American patients with late effects had at least one and 58% two or more of these minor alleles. No statistical significance was found relating the studied NOS3 polymorphisms and normal tissue toxicity.

Conclusions

These results support a strong association between wound repair and late toxicities of radiation. The presence of these genetic risk factors can vary significantly among different ethnic groups, as demonstrated for some of the SNPs. Future studies should account for the possibility of such ethnic heterogeneity in the late toxicities of radiation.

BACKGROUND

Radiation therapy is used in the treatment of approximately 60% of all cancer patients. Improvements in treatment delivery by increasing the amount of radiation targeted to a tumor and minimizing normal tissue exposure has enhanced the therapeutic ratio. Nonetheless, the potential for normal tissue toxicity remains a factor limiting the amount of radiation given for tumor control. With increasing effectiveness of different treatment modalities, there is a growing number of patients who are cancer survivors and potentially at risk for the late effects of radiation. Thus, preventing and reducing normal tissue toxicities of radiation are increasingly important components in any treatment plan (1,2).

Normal tissue toxicity is roughly divided into two categories, early and late. Early toxicities, such as mucositis, occur within the first few weeks of treatment and, for the most part, are self-limited and resolve with appropriate medical care. Late toxicities, such as pneumonitis and lung fibrosis, occur months to years post treatment and may be progressive and irreversible. Although the detailed mechanisms underlying normal tissue toxicities vary from tissue to tissue, the central underlying mechanism appears to be abnormal wound healing(1-4). Normal wound repair involves a transient inflammatory phase of increased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and recruitment of pro-inflammatory cells occurs followed by neovascularization and reepithelization, including the expression of anti-inflammatory molecules such as Transforming Growth Factor-β (TGFβ), recruitment of fibroblasts and deposition of collagen, and extracellular matrix formation for wound closure. When fully regenerated, remodeling occurs with apoptotic removal of fibroblasts to form an acellular scar. Radiation-induced normal tissue toxicity such as lung fibrosis is seen as a chronic inflammatory response leading to unbalanced overexpression of collagen and the extracellular matrix(2).

Interpatient variability in response to defined treatment protocols has led to the proposal that a genetic basis underlies the probability of developing radiation-induced late toxicity. This hypothesis is supported by evidence showing no intrapatient variability in severity when two different treated areas of the same patient are compared with respect to normal tissue toxicity(2). A genetic basis underlying radiation toxicity is also found in the association of rare genetic syndromes with heightened radiosensitivity, e.g. Fanconi's anemia (2). Because of these correlations and potential medical benefits for predictive assays, a new field of radiogenomics has developed to investigate potential links between normal tissue radiosensitivity and patient genetic profile. These studies have mostly focused on specific single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes thought to have a role in the pathogenesis of this injury, e.g. TGFβ1, but more recently genome wide association approaches are being considered(5). Identifying genes whose expression levels contribute to late radiation-induced tissue toxicity may offer potential therapeutic targets.

Consistent with evidence for genetic variability in risk of radiation induced toxicity is the observation of apparent differences in risk for some late effects between African-Americans and Caucasians. For example, in an analysis of >40,000 breast cancer patients treated with radiotherapy, African-American women had a statistically significant increased chance of experiencing a myocardial infarction (OR=1.33) or myocardial infarction plus ischemia (OR=1.23) after radiotherapy compared to Caucasian women(6). No candidate gene(s) has been identified to explain this finding. The demographics of our patient population, however, allows us to test whether racial differences in gene polymorphism profiles require consideration in associating the polymorphisms with the late effects of radiation.

The four candidate genes studied were chosen because of their roles in wound repair and fibrosis and their responsiveness to radiation exposure. To our knowledge, potential racial variations in the frequency of these polymorphisms and the risk of radiation-induced fibrosis have not been previously analyzed. TGFβ has been extensively studied in radiation biology because of its roles in fibrosis and inflammation (1,2,7). Heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) expression is induced by radiation in vitro(8) and in vivo in the lungs of mice(9). HO-1 deficiencies in mice and humans enhance the inflammatory effects of mild oxidative stresses consistent with its role as an anti-oxidative and anti-inflammatory molecule (10-13). Several investigations have also demonstrated that CO, a product of HO-1 catalysis, is anti-fibrotic and that TGFβ and HO-1 in general oppose each other's activities (11). Nuclear regulatory factor-2 (Nrf2), a transcription factor encoded by the NFE2L2 gene, regulates expression of several anti-oxidant proteins with the antioxidant response element in their promoters including HO-1, glutathione transferases, and glutathione peroxidase. Ionizing radiation stimulates NFE2L2 transcriptional activityand mice deficient in NFE2L2 show reduced life spans after thoracic radiation (8,14). As with HO-1, TGFβ interacts antagonistically with Nrf2 (15). We have also focused on nitric oxide synthase-3 (NOS3) based on an association of some NOS3 SNPs with the late effects of radiation and the evidence that NO stimulates Nrf2 activity and activates latent TGFβ (16-20).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients were recruited to this IRB-approved prospective study after obtaining informed consent. One group of patients (n=179) treated with curative intent were enrolled at the time they were diagnosed by their radiation oncologist with late radiation induced normal tissue injury according to the RTOG/EORTC Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring Schema (21). At enrollment, 5ml of blood was drawn and fractionated into serum and buffy coats by centrifugation. A second group of patients (n=26) were enrolled prior to beginning radiation therapy with curative intent. These patients provided blood before treatment, the day after the first treatment, every 2 weeks during treatment, at 6 months after treatment and at any subsequent time point when in the opinion of their attending radiation oncologist they developed a late complication from radiation. None of these patients had late toxicity at the time of analysis, and serve as the irradiated controls. Genomic DNA was isolated from frozen buffy coats using the ABI Prism 6100 Nucleic Acid Prep Station.

The NOS3 SNPs were genotyped using VIC® and FAM® labeled primers from Applied Biosystems in custom-made plates according to the manufacturer's instructions and amplified on a ABI 7500 Fast Real Time PCR machine. The NFE2L2 promoter SNPS were studied as described (22). The HO-1 GT repeat domain was isolated by PCR using the sense primer, 5’-AGAGCCTGCAGCT... TCTCAGA-3’ and for the antisense primer, 5’-[6-FAM]AGAGCC...GCAGCTTCTCAGA-3’. Primers for the TGFβ1 SNP were: 5′-CAGACTCTAGAGACTGTCAG-3′ (forward) and 5′-GTCCTCTTTCTCTGGTGAC-3′ (reverse). PCR products were sent to SeqWright DNA Technology Services (Houston, TX) for capillary sequencing and validation by chromatography for HMOX1 and Sanger sequencing for TGFβ1 and NFE2L2.

Each polymorphism is summarized to the observed minor allele frequency in two ethnic groups. The general population allele frequencies are from the PubMed SNP database, a research thesis for HMOX1(23), and ref. (24) for the NFE2L2 SNPs. Test of significance is done by a two sided chi-square test for the hypothesis of the equality of the observed allele frequency and the population allele frequency using continuity correction(25). Population frequency of co-occurrence of SNPs on different genes is assumed to be independent as haplotypic dependence is not expected to span multiple genes. In our sample we checked the subjects with minor alleles and compared that to our computed population proportion using a large sample chi squared test for equality of proportions. The same procedure is used to compare the minor allele frequency between high toxicity (severity =2,3) and low toxicity (severity =0,1) groups within each ethnicity. All analyses were done using the statistical computing software R v3.0.2.

RESULTS

Patient demographics are shown in Table 1. Of the 205 patients 43% were African-American and 56% Caucasian reflecting the patient population served by our institution. Approximately 80% of the patients were treated for breast or head and neck cancer. Severity scores of 0 (no late effects), 1, 2 and 3 (mildest to severe) were determined by the patients’ radiation oncologist and distributed 10%, 49%, 36% and 5% respectively. Because of small numbers within each subgroup, patients were subdivided into Low (score of 0 and 1) and High severity (score of 2 and 3) to determine if the SNPs independently predict the severity of late effects.

Table 1.

Patient Demographics (n=205)

Characteristics Number %
Gender
Female 94 46
Male 111 54
Race (self declared)
African-American 87 43
Caucasian 114 56
Asian 4 1
Site
Breast 66 32
Head and Neck 97 47
Lung 18 9
Prostate 14 7
Other 10 5
Smoking Status
Past 90 44
Never 47 23
Yes 55 27
Unknown 13 6
Dose (Gy)
≤ 50.0 40 20
50.0-69.9 84 41
≥70.0 61 39
Diabetes
African-American 28 of 87 32
Caucasian 21 of 114 18
Asian 1 of 4 25
Severity Scores
0 26 12
1 95 46
2 69 34
3 10 5
Unknown 5 3

The length of the GT repeat in the HMOX1 promoter determines transcriptional robustness –the longer the repeat the less transcriptional activity under conditions of oxidative stress (26). In the present analysis, the short or S-allele was defined as GT repeats < 26, M-allele between 26 and 32 and the L-allele >32 repeats (10-23). The results in Table 2 for HMOX1 demonstrate a strong association between the L allele and late toxicity in patients of both races relative to the general population stratified by race. With Caucasian patients, there was also a negative association between S allele frequency and late effects with a statistically significant reduced S allele frequency in these patients relative to the Caucasian population as a whole. Prior studies confirmed significant differences in the GT repeat frequencies between the two ethnic groups (23). When patients were stratified into Low and High degrees of severity, the L, M or S alleles were not predictive of severity (Supplemental Tables 1A and 1B).

Table 2.

Gene Polymorphisms of HO-1, NFE2L2, TGFβ1 and NOS3 in Patients with Radiation-Induced Normal Tissue Late Toxicities

HMOX-1
GT Repeat (L>33) NEa LL ML MM SL SM SS L Allele Freq. 95% CI Pop L Allele Freq. P-Value
African-American 12 6 17 17 8 9 4 0.30 0.23-0.39 0.16 0.00
Caucasian 28 2 6 17 2 38 4 .09 .05-0.15 0.03 0.00
GT Repeat (S<26) NEa LL ML MM SL SM SS S Allele Freq. 95% CI Pop S Allele Freq. P-Value
African-American 12 6 17 17 8 9 4 0.21 0.14-0.29 0.24 0.42
Caucasian 28 2 6 17 2 38 4 0.35 0.27-0.43 0.44 0.04
NFE2L2
A>G −653 rs35652124 NEa AA AG GG Allele Freq. 95% CI Pop. Allele Freq. P-Value
African-American 8 41 21 3 0.21 0.14-0.29 0.19 0.69
Caucasian 14 44 33 6 0.27 0.21-0.35 0.32 0.21
G>A −651 rs6706649 NEa GG AG AA
African-American 8 57 7 1 0.07 0.03-0.13 0.05 0.42
Caucasian 14 65 18 0 0.11 0.07-0.17 0.10 0.82
C>A −617 rs6721961 NEa CC AC AA
African-American 8 52 11 2 0.12 0.07-0.19 0.02 0.00
Caucasian 14 62 17 4 0.15 0.10-0.22 0.11 0.12
TGFβ1
C>T rs1800469 NEa CC CT TT Allele Freq. 95% CI Pop. Allele Freq. P-Value
African-American 19 13 32 9 0.46 0.37-0.56 0.23 0.00
Caucasian 34 27 25 11 0.37 0.29-0.46 0.40 0.60
NOS3
T>C rs2070744 NEa TT CT CC Allele Freq. 95% CI Pop. Allele Freq. P-Value
African-American 6 41 20 2 0.19 0.13-0.27 0.18 0.73
Caucasian 8 29 38 12 0.39 0.32-0.47 0.42 0.53
G>T rs1799983 NEa GG GT TT
African-American 33 26 10 0 0.14 0.07-0.25 0.15 0.92
Caucasian 43 14 25 5 0.40 0.30-0.51 0.35 0.35
a

NE : not evaluable; 95% CI: 95% Confidence interval

Presence of minor alleles in three SNPs (rs35652124, rs6706649, rs6721961) of the NFE2L2 promoter results in reduced expression of Nrf2 (27). When stratified by race, only the minor allele at rs6721961 is associated with a significantly higher risk for developing late effects in African-Americans with a trend in Caucasians (Table 2). However, the 95% CI for the allele frequency of the SNP within each ethnicity has some overlap, suggesting the effect to be broader than just one ethnicity. NFE2L2 SNPS were also analyzed in terms of severity of late effects. As shown in Supplemental Data Tables 1C and D, none of the NFE2L2 SNPs have any statistically significant predictive value for severity of late effects although trends were observed for rs6721961 and rs6706649, respectively, for African-Americans and Caucasians.

An initial analysis of the TGFβ1 promoter SNP rs1800469 revealed no predictive value when the total patient pool was analyzed in agreement with recent studies (28). When stratified by race a significant association for developing late toxicity was observed for African-Americans expressing the minor allele but not for Caucasians (Table 2). The TGFβ1 rs1800469 SNP was, however, significantly predictive of late toxicity in Caucasian patients (Tables 3A,B). In Caucasians with high toxicity indices (2 and 3) the minor allele SNP frequency was 0.47 compared to 0.26 for patients with low measures of severity (p = 0.01).

Table 3A.

Analysis of TGFβ1 and Severity of Late Effects in African American Patients

C>T rs1800469 Major Allele Het Minor Allele Minor Allele Freq P value
High 6 6 5 0.47 0.81
Low 13 29 6 0.43

Table 3B.

Analysis of TGFβ1 and Severity of Late Effects in Caucasian Patients

C>T rs1800469 Major Allele Het Minor Allele Minor Allele Freq P value
High 11 12 9 0.47 0.01
Low 25 17 3 0.26

The present study examined two NOS3 SNPs that previous studies suggested are involved in radiation-induced late effects (17,18). No significant association of either SNP with late effects was observed (Table 2).

Besides looking at individual SNPs in isolation, combinations of these SNPs as a genetic risk score were also evaluated (Table 4). Of the 71 evaluated African-American subjects 66 or 93% carry at least one minor allele among the genes showing an association for late effects. The probability of this occurring in the general population, assuming independent segregation with the SNPs being on different genes is 1-(1-0.16)*(1-0.02)*(1-0.23) =0.37. This is significantly lower than the rate of occurrence in our sample population of African-American patients that were evaluable (p<0.001). In addition, 58% of these patients showed 2 or 3 of the minor alleles of HMOX1, NFE2L2 and TGFβ1. It is important to note that 3 of the 6 African-American patients not characterized by these 3 minor alleles carried a minor allele at the other NFE2L2 promoter sites that depress Nrf2 expression. If one includes these in the analysis, 95% of the African-American patients express at least one of the minor alleles potentially associated with the late effects of radiation.

Table 4.

Combined Minor Allele Frequency Analysis

African-American* # Minor Alleles 0 1 2 3 or 4
Patient Count* 5 25 19 22
% 7 35 27 31
Cumulative % 10 42 69 100
Caucasian# # Minor Alleles 0 1 2 3 or 4
Patient Count* 12 43 28 7
% 13 48 31 8
Cumulative % 14 62 93 100
*

There were 83 African-American patients with late effects of which 12 were excluded in this combined analysis because of incomplete SNP analysis.

#

There were 92 Caucasian patients with late effects of which 5 were excluded in this combined analysis because of incomplete SNP analysis

For Caucasians, 87% have at least one of the minor alleles compared to 48% for the general population (Table 4). However, only 39% of these patients have 2 or more of the minor alleles.

Table 5 is the analysis for patients who do not show late effects and for which data from both African-Americans and Caucasians have been combined because of the fewer patient numbers in this category, e.g. only 4 African-Americans with enough usable sequence data. The SNP frequencies in this table do not differ from our Caucasian patients with toxicities but are significantly different from the African-American patients with late effects (Table 4). One explanation is that there is predictive value for these SNPs when combined in the case of African-Americans but possibly not Caucasians.

Table 5.

Combined Minor Allele Frequency Analysis for Patients without Late Effects

# Minor Alleles 0 1 2 3 or 4
Patient Count* 4 11 10 1
% 15 42 39 4
Cumulative % 10 57 96 100
*

There were a total of 26 African-American and Caucasian patients who at six months or later did not show physician-defined late effects.

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this is the first study describing a genetic explanation for possible differences in susceptibility to late radiation-induced normal tissue injury between ethnic groups. We focused on selected polymorphisms of 4 genes whose gene products interact to modulate wound repair and for which there is experimental and clinical data suggesting involvement in the development of late normal tissue toxicity. The results for HMOX1 show that regardless of race, the GT repeat in the promoter is associated with development of late toxicity. In contrast, the TGFβ1 SNP rs1800469 and the NFE2L2 SNP rs6721961 are associated with increased risk for late toxicities in African Americans but not in Caucasians.

Numerous studies have demonstrated a critical role for HO-1 in fibrotic and chronic inflammatory diseases (10-13, 29,30). One mechanism is HO-1-synthesized CO dependent suppression of TGFβ1-stimulated collagen synthesis as shown in mouse and human fibroblasts(12). Studies with endothelium show that the length of the GT repeat in the HMOX1 promoter modulates HO-1 expression levels, i.e., the longer the repeat the lower the expression. Endothelial cells expressing the shorter repeat (<26) are more resistant to oxidative stress and produce lower levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Clinical trials also suggest that the length of repeat is predictive of cardiovascular problems(10). However, like the TGFβ1 SNP studies, the results are mixed and may reflect racial differences in the populations examined that were not considered in the analyses, e.g. differences in the GT repeat frequencies between Caucasians and African-Americans(23).

Radiation induces a temporally triphasic enhanced expression of HO-1 in the rat lung (9). HO-1 expression is regulated by the NFE2L2 encoded transcription factor, Nrf2 (18). NFE2L2 knockout mice are more sensitive to thoracic radiation than wild type mice (14) and Nrf2 expression is depressed by a minor allele at rs672961 in the NFE2L2 promoter. For African-Americans, an increased minor allele frequency at rs672961 in the NFE2L2 promoter shows an association with late injury after radiation therapy. The mechanistic significance of this observation and association of the TGFβ1 rs1800469 SNP with respect to whether African-Americans have an increased probability for radiation induced late effects is unclear but given that they are functionally antagonistic their combination would be expected to promote toxicity.

The minor allele frequencies of these 2 SNPS are both lower in the African-American general population relative to the Caucasian general population. This suggests that other interacting genes may be important. Of interest are genes involved in the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis or scleroderma, an autoimmune connective tissue disease characterized by micro-vascular injury, and overproduction of collagen and other extracellular matrix components. This disease is more than twice as prevalent in African Americans as in Caucasians (31,32). Ethnic differences in anti-fibrotic hepatocyte growth factor expression and c-MET growth factor receptor activity in lung fibroblasts have been measured and decreased activities of both are characteristic of African American patients with systemic sclerosis(32). Other studies demonstrate that African American endothelial cells exhibit higher levels of oxidative stress possibly due to altered expression of NADPH oxidase subunits and this may contribute to elevated inflammation and poor wound repair (33).

The most extensively evaluated SNP in radiation toxicity studies is rs1800469 in the promoter for TGFβ1. Focus on this SNP originated in correlations found between elevated serum or tissue levels of TGFβ and the development of different fibrotic diseases or radiation injury(4,7,34-39). Attempts to demonstrate an association between radiation-induced toxicity and rs1800469 produced mixed results (36-39). A meta analysis of 2782 European breast cancer patients in 11 cohorts failed to show a significant association between rs1800469 and late toxicity or fibrosis(39). However, the demographics of this study group is unlikely to reflect the makeup of the US population, thus the findings may not be applicable to a more ethnically diverse American group of patients.

Conclusions from this study are tempered by the fact that we used as controls a relatively small group of cancer patients receiving radiation who did not develop late toxicity and a race stratified general population. While most studies assign a minimum latency of 3 months to allow for resolution of acute toxicity before scoring late effects, there is no time period beyond which the risk of late toxicity from radiation falls to zero. Thus, using a control group exposed to radiotherapy risks including patients who may, with longer follow-up actually develop late injury and thus may be misclassified. For this reason, we also chose to compare the irradiated patients to the general population stratified by race as a second control group, as this group is less likely to harbor significant groups of potentially misclassified patients. In addition, this type of comparison may provide useful risk information in the setting in which non-cancer patients might be exposed to significant amounts of ionizing radiation, such as in the setting of a nuclear accident or radiologic terrorism.

However this comparison presents its own weakness, ie. the polymorphisms are potentially involved in carcinogenesis. For example, a possible role of the (GT)n polymorphism in carcinogenesis have been examined. Results are mixed and are difficult to compare with our patient population since with many of these studies are based on Asian populations (40-44). However, in one American study comparing 500 post-menopausal women with breast cancer to 500 without found that women with HMOX1 genotypes (LS + MM + MS + SS) not including LL and LM (reference group) had a reduced breast cancer risk of borderline significance (0.78 versus 1), when age-adjusted or fully adjusted for race, age, BMI, family history of breast cancer, and numerous other factors (40). Enhanced HO-1 expression and an additional increased expression in response to therapies characterizes most tumors (45-46). The increased HO-1 expression is anti-apoptotic and promotes angiogenesis both of which promote tumor growth but also mitigate normal tissue injury (2).

The roles of the NFE2L2 promoter SNPs and Nrf2 expression in carcinogenesis have also been examined. Regardless of the tumor type Nrf2 expression is elevated in head and neck, bladder, colorectal, and lung tumors (47-50). Furthermore, the minor allele of rs6721961 SNP has not been associated with bladder, lung, gastric or colorectal carcinogenesis (48).

Our results testing only four genes in wound repair indicate that this pathway may have significant impact in the development of radiation-induced late effects. Not all polymorphisms of these genes have been analyzed and thus other polymorphisms of these genes may impact susceptibility to late radiation toxicity. These findings also indicate that racial differences represent important risk factors for normal tissue injury from radiotherapy and should be considered in future studies.

Supplementary Material

Supl.

SUMMARY.

This study shows that polymorphisms of three genes involved in wound repair and response to radiation can potentially predict late normal tissue toxicity if racial differences in polymorphism frequencies are considered. Increased frequency of a long GT repeat in the HMOX1 promoter was associated with late effects in both African-Americans and Caucasian patient populations. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the TGFβ1 and NFE2L2 promoters were significantly associated with late effects in African-Americans but not Caucasians.

Acknowledgments

Funding: Supported by NIH grants R01CA090881 and T32 CA113277, a pilot project from Massey Cancer Center and biostatistical support from VCU Massey Cancer Center Biostatistics Shared Resource supported with funding from NIH-NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA016059.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Conflicts of Interest: No conflicts of interest

REFERENCES

  • 1.Anscher MS, Vujaskovic Z. Mechanisms and potential targets for prevention and treatment of normal tissue injury after radiation therapy. Semin Oncol. 2005;32(2 Suppl 3):S86–91. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2005.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bentzen SM. Preventing or reducing late side effects of radiation therapy: radiobiology meets molecular pathology. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6(9):702–13. doi: 10.1038/nrc1950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhao W, Robbins ME. Inflammation and chronic oxidative stress in radiation-induced late normal tissue injury: therapeutic implications. Curr Med Chem. 2009;16(2):130–43. doi: 10.2174/092986709787002790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wynn TA. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of fibrosis. J Pathol. 2008;214(2):199–210. doi: 10.1002/path.2277. PMCID: 2693329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.West CM, Dunning AM, Rosenstein BS. Genome-wide association studies and prediction of normal tissue toxicity. Semin Radiat Oncol. 22(2):91–9. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2011.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Doyle JJ, Neugut AI, Jacobson JS, Wang J, McBride R, Grann A, et al. Radiation therapy, cardiac risk factors, and cardiac toxicity in early-stage breast cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;68(1):82–93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Anscher MS, Peters WP, Reisenbichler H, Petros WP, Jirtle RL. Transforming growth factor beta as a predictor of liver and lung fibrosis after autologous bone marrow transplantation for advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(22):1592–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199306033282203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.McDonald JT, Kim K, Norris AJ, Vlashi E, Phillips TM, Lagadec C, et al. Ionizing radiation activates the Nrf2 antioxidant response. Cancer Res. 2010;70(21):8886–95. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0171. PMCID: 2970706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yakovlev VA, Rabender CS, Sankala H, Gauter-Fleckenstein B, Fleckenstein K, Batinic-Haberle I, et al. Proteomic analysis of radiation-induced changes in rat lung: Modulation by the superoxide dismutase mimetic MnTE-2-PyP(5+). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;78(2):547–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.03.037. PMCID: 2939237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Grochot-Przeczek A, Dulak J, Jozkowicz A. Haem oxygenase-1: non-canonical roles in physiology and pathology. Clin Sci (Lond) 2011;122(3):93–103. doi: 10.1042/CS20110147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lundvig DM, Immenschuh S, Wagener FA. Heme oxygenase, inflammation, and fibrosis: the good, the bad, and the ugly? Front Pharmacol. 2012;3:81. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2012.00081. PMCID: 3345581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nakamura T, Matsushima M, Hayashi Y, Shibasaki M, Imaizumi K, Hashimoto N, et al. Attenuation of transforming growth factor-beta-stimulated collagen production in fibroblasts by quercetin-induced heme oxygenase-1. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2011;44(5):614–20. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2010-0338OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ryter SW, Kim HP, Nakahira K, Zuckerbraun BS, Morse D, Choi AM. Protective Functions of Heme Oxygenase-1 and Carbon Monoxide in the Respiratory System. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2007 doi: 10.1089/ars.2007.1811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Travis EL, Rachakonda G, Zhou X, Korhonen K, Sekhar KR, Biswas S, et al. NRF2 deficiency reduces life span of mice administered thoracic irradiation. Free Radic Biol Med. 2011;51(6):1175–83. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.05.038. PMCID: 3156301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Okita Y, Kamoshida A, Suzuki H, Itoh K, Motohashi H, Igarashi K, et al. Transforming growth factor-beta induces transcription factors MafK and Bach1 to suppress expression of the heme oxygenase-1 gene. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(28):20658–67. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.450478. PMCID: 3711329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Filippin LI, Moreira AJ, Marroni NP, Xavier RM. Nitric oxide and repair of skeletal muscle injury. Nitric Oxide. 2009;21(3-4):157–63. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2009.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hildebrandt MA, Komaki R, Liao Z, Gu J, Chang JY, Ye Y, et al. Genetic variants in inflammation-related genes are associated with radiation-induced toxicity following treatment for non-small cell lung cancer. PLoS One. 2010;5(8):e12402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012402. PMCID: 2928273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Liu XM, Peyton KJ, Ensenat D, Wang H, Hannink M, Alam J, et al. Nitric oxide stimulates heme oxygenase-1 gene transcription via the Nrf2/ARE complex to promote vascular smooth muscle cell survival. Cardiovasc Res. 2007 doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2007.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Terrazzino S, La Mattina P, Masini L, Caltavuturo T, Gambaro G, Canonico PL, et al. Common variants of eNOS and XRCC1 genes may predict acute skin toxicity in breast cancer patients receiving radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery. Radiother Oncol. 2012;103(2):199–205. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Vodovotz Y, Chesler L, Chong H, Kim SJ, Simpson JT, DeGraff W, et al. Regulation of transforming growth factor beta1 by nitric oxide. Cancer Res. 1999;59(9):2142–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. http://www.rtog.org/ResearchAssociates/AdverseEventReporting/RTOGEORC LateRadiationMorbidityScoringSchema.aspx.
  • 22.Hua CC, Chang LC, Tseng JC, Chu CM, Liu YC, Shieh WB. Functional haplotypes in the promoter region of transcription factor Nrf2 in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Dis Markers. 2010;28(3):185–93. doi: 10.3233/DMA-2010-0700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ferguson JM. An Examination of Genetic Polymorphisms in the Enzyme Heme Oxygenase-1 and Their Relationship to Cardiovascular Disease. Ohio State University; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Marczak ED, Marzec J, Zeldin DC, Kleeberger SR, Brown NJ, Pretorius M, et al. Polymorphisms in the transcription factor NRF2 and forearm vasodilator responses in humans. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2012;22(8):620–8. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0b013e32835516e5. PMCID: 3599320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Newcombe RG. Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Stat Med. 1998;17(8):857–72. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<857::aid-sim777>3.0.co;2-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Exner M, Minar E, Wagner O, Schillinger M. The role of heme oxygenase-1 promoter polymorphisms in human disease. Free Radic Biol Med. 2004;37(8):1097–104. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2004.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Marzec JM, Christie JD, Reddy SP, Jedlicka AE, Vuong H, Lanken PN, et al. Functional polymorphisms in the transcription factor NRF2 in humans increase the risk of acute lung injury. FASEB J. 2007;21(9):2237–46. doi: 10.1096/fj.06-7759com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Barnett GC, Coles CE, Burnet NG, Pharoah PD, Wilkinson J, West CM, et al. No association between SNPs regulating TGF-beta1 secretion and late radiotherapy toxicity to the breast: results from the RAPPER study. Radiother Oncol. 97(1):9–14. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.12.006. PMCID: 3120654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ryter SW, Alam J, Choi AM. Heme oxygenase-1/carbon monoxide: from basic science to therapeutic applications. Physiol Rev. 2006;86(2):583–650. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00011.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Loboda A, Was H, Jozkowicz A, Dulak J. Janus face of Nrf2-HO-1 axis in cancer--friend in chemoprevention, foe in anticancer therapy. Lung Cancer. 2008;60(1):1–3. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.10.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Reveille JD. Ethnicity and race and systemic sclerosis: how it affects susceptibility, severity, antibody genetics, and clinical manifestations. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2003;5(2):160–7. doi: 10.1007/s11926-003-0045-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bogatkevich GS, Ludwicka-Bradley A, Highland KB, Hant F, Nietert PJ, Singleton CB, et al. Impairment of the antifibrotic effect of hepatocyte growth factor in lung fibroblasts from African Americans: possible role in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56(7):2432–42. doi: 10.1002/art.22713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Feairheller DL, Park JY, Sturgeon KM, Williamson ST, Diaz KM, Veerabhadrappa P, et al. Racial differences in oxidative stress and inflammation: in vitro and in vivo. Clin Transl Sci. 2011;4(1):32–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00264.x. PMCID: 3077905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Anscher MS, Kong FM, Jirtle RL. The relevance of transforming growth factor beta 1 in pulmonary injury after radiation therapy. Lung Cancer. 1998;19(2):109–20. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5002(97)00076-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Anscher MS, Thrasher B, Rabbani Z, Teicher B, Vujaskovic Z. Antitransforming growth factor-beta antibody 1D11 ameliorates normal tissue damage caused by high-dose radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;65(3):876–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.02.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kelsey CR, Jackson L, Langdon S, Owzar K, Hubbs J, Vujaskovic Z, et al. A Polymorphism Within the Promoter of the TGFbeta1 Gene Is Associated With Radiation Sensitivity Using an Objective Radiologic Endpoint. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.02.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lyons AJ, West CM, Risk JM, Slevin NJ, Chan C, Crichton S, et al. Osteoradionecrosis in head-and-neck cancer has a distinct genotype-dependent cause. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 82(4):1479–84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Reuther S, Metzke E, Bonin M, Petersen C, Dikomey E, Raabe A. No Effect of the Transforming Growth Factor beta1 Promoter Polymorphism C-509T on TGFB1 Gene Expression, Protein Secretion, or Cellular Radiosensitivity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 85(2):460–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.01.090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Barnett GC, Elliott RM, Alsner J, Andreassen CN, Abdelhay O, Burnet NG, et al. Individual patient data meta-analysis shows no association between the SNP rs1800469 in TGFB and late radiotherapy toxicity. Radiother Oncol. 2012;105(3):289–95. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.10.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hong CC, Ambrosone CB, Ahn J, Choi JY, McCullough ML, Stevens VL, et al. Genetic variability in iron-related oxidative stress pathways (Nrf2, NQ01, NOS3, and HO-1), iron intake, and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16(9):1784–94. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhang L, Song FF, Huang YB, Zheng H, Song FJ, Chen KX. Association between the (GT)n polymorphism of the HO-1 gene promoter region and cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(11):4617–22. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.11.4617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Vashist YK, Uzungolu G, Kutup A, Gebauer F, Koenig A, Deutsch L, et al. Heme oxygenase-1 germ line GTn promoter polymorphism is an independent prognosticator of tumor recurrence and survival in pancreatic cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2011;104(3):305–11. doi: 10.1002/jso.21926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hu JL, Li ZY, Liu W, Zhang RG, Li GL, Wang T, et al. Polymorphism in heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) promoter and alcohol are related to the risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma on Chinese males. Neoplasma. 2010;57(1):86–92. doi: 10.4149/neo_2010_01_086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Okamoto I, Krogler J, Endler G, Kaufmann S, Mustafa S, Exner M, et al. A microsatellite polymorphism in the heme oxygenase-1 gene promoter is associated with risk for melanoma. Int J Cancer. 2006;119(6):1312–5. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hirai H, Kubo H, Yamaya M, Nakayama K, Numasaki M, Kobayashi S, et al. Microsatellite polymorphism in heme oxygenase-1 gene promoter is associated with susceptibility to oxidant-induced apoptosis in lymphoblastoid cell lines. Blood. 2003;102(5):1619–21. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-12-3733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Jozkowicz A, Was H, Dulak J. Heme oxygenase-1 in tumors: is it a false friend? Antioxid Redox Signal. 2007;9(12):2099–117. doi: 10.1089/ars.2007.1659. PMCID: 2096718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ishikawa T. Genetic polymorphism in the NRF2 gene as a prognosis marker for cancer chemotherapy. Front Genet. 2014;5:383. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00383. PMCID: 4219421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Reszka E, Jablonowski Z, Wieczorek E, Jablonska E, Krol MB, Gromadzinska J, et al. Polymorphisms of NRF2 and NRF2 target genes in urinary bladder cancer patients. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2014;140(10):1723–31. doi: 10.1007/s00432-014-1733-0. PMCID: 4160566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Tijhuis MJ, Visker MH, Aarts JM, Laan W, de Boer SY, Kok FJ, et al. NQO1 and NFE2L2 polymorphisms, fruit and vegetable intake and smoking and the risk of colorectal adenomas in an endoscopy-based population. Int J Cancer. 2008;122(8):1842–8. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Comprehensive genomic characterization of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Nature. 2015;517(7536):576–82. doi: 10.1038/nature14129. PMCID: 4311405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supl.

RESOURCES