Abstract
This study was conducted to review the abundance and diversity of radiopaque foreign bodies over a 25-year period. Overall records of 1,114 patients who underwent rigid bronchoscopy due to foreign body aspiration in the tertiary centres, Imam Khomeini and Apadana; over a 25-year period (1989–2014) were reviewed. History, clinical findings, plain radiography and bronchoscopic findings, foreign body (FB) aspiration (whether radiolucent or radiopaque), time from onset of symptoms until hospitalization, and delay time were all considered. The male/female ratio was 1.53. Most patients were aged 1–3 years (53.94 %). The most common location of foreign bodies was the right main bronchus (54.57 %). The most common type of radiopaque foreign body was meat, chicken and big fish bones (4.84 %) followed by metal objects (4.39 %). Coughing (70.82 %) and cyanosis (22.80 %) were the most common symptoms. The most common radiological findings were emphysema (32.31 %). Given that the radiological findings are highly specific as regards the detection of radiopaque FB, radiographic examination prior to bronchoscopy for FB localization and shortening the time of bronchoscopy in patients with a history of radiopaque FB aspiration can be helpful. Due to the high morbidity and mortality caused by prolong and repeated bronchoscopy, the use of newer techniques and equipment in shortening extraction time of the foreign bodies should be considered in future researches.
Keywords: Foreign body aspiration, Radiopaque, Children, Bronchoscopy, Imaging
Introduction
Foreign body (FB) aspiration is a major health problem that often affects children, and a significant proportion of FB aspiration objects are Radiopaque [1, 2]. FB aspiration accounts for 7 % of all sudden deaths in children less than 4 years old in the United States of America [3, 4]. Coughing, chocking, acute respiratory distress and acute onset of wheezing are the most common symptoms of FB aspiration, though these symptoms can be quickly relieved even while the FB remains [2]. The most common form of aspirated material is food [5–9]. Rigid bronchoscopy is recommended for children with FB aspiration impression [10, 11]. Radiopaque FB aspiration, with a prevalence of 7–27 % of FB aspiration, can leave a variety of complications if not diagnosed and treated properly.
FB aspiration has been reported, but its frequency varies widely, depending upon local conditions, different foods and the individual’s health. In previous studies carried out regarding the evaluation of FB aspiration, radiolucent FBs were more often considered in relation to radiopaque FBs, while radiopaque objects are important because were detected more quickly and easily with available equipment, such as plain radiography. Accordingly, we examine patients with radiopaque FB aspiration as a step towards improving the process of the diagnosis and treatment of these patients.
Materials and Methods
In this retrospective study all children under 14 years with FB aspiration complaints referred from clinics to general hospitals and finally referred to our subspecialty hospitals; Imam Khomeini and Apadana, Ahvaz, Iran—as tertiary centres which are the only centres for bronchoscopy in the state Khuzestan—and rigid Bronchoscopy was performed to, under general anesthesia, with different sizes depending on patients age, then foreign bodies were extracted with appropriate forceps.
This process was reviewed over a 25 year period (January 1989–January 2014) and collected data was classified based on the history, physical examination type of the FB (radiopaque or radiolucent), signs and neck, lung and abdomen plain radiography. Admission times (length of time between the beginning of symptoms and the performance of bronchoscopy) and delay times and impressions were considered. According to the elapsed time from the start of symptoms to their referral, they were classified into two groups: those who were admitted within 24 h were called ‘early’, and those were diagnosed after 24 h or else who else were admitted afterwards was called ‘late’. Data were presented using descriptive statistics and included frequency, percentage and mean ± SD criteria. The information was then analysed by SPSS 22.0.
Results
Overall, 1,114 patients with FB aspiration were admitted to the Imam Khomeini and Apadana hospitals, Ahwaz, from 1989 to 2014. The ratio of male-to-female was 1.53:1. Most of the accidents occurred at age 1–3 years, totalling 601 (53.94 %) cases (Table 1). The average age was 2.4 years (range 2 months–10 years). The youngest patient was 3 months old, who had aspirated almond.
Table 1.
Demographic data of patients
| Variable | N | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | ||
| <1 | 238 | 21.36 |
| 1–3 | 601 | 53.94 |
| 4–6 | 175 | 15.70 |
| >6 | 100 | 8.97 |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 675 | 60.59 |
| Female | 439 | 39.40 |
| Foreign body location | ||
| Right main bronchus | 608 | 54.57 |
| Left main bronchus | 213 | 19.12 |
| Trachea | 173 | 15.52 |
| Vocal cord | 97 | 8.70 |
| Both bronchus | 23 | 2.06 |
| Radiopaque FBs type | ||
| Meat, chicken and big fish bones | 54 | 47.78 |
| Metallic objects | 49 | 43.36 |
| Bullet | 5 | 4.42 |
| Coil | 5 | 4.42 |
| Total | 113 | 100 |
Represented by 712 patients (63.91 %), seeds made up the highest proportion (Table 2). Obstructive emphysema, in 360 patients (32.31 %), was the most common radiological finding (Table 3). CT scan was used to identify long-term pulmonary complications. The most frequent symptom was coughing, in 789 (70.82 %) patients. Most of the patients (466) were referred back in 1–7 days.
Table 2.
Variation of foreign bodies in the respiratory tract
| Foreign body | No. of patients | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Seed | 712 | 63.91 |
| Food material | 132 | 11.84 |
| Peanut | 99 | 8.88 |
| Meat, chicken and big fish bones | 54 | 4.84 |
| Metallic object | 49 | 4.39 |
| Plastic object | 27 | 2.42 |
| Paper | 19 | 1.70 |
| Stone | 12 | 1.07 |
| Bullet | 5 | 0.44 |
| Coil | 5 | 0.44 |
| Total | 1,114 | 100 |
Table 3.
Imaging findings in patients with foreign bodies
| Dominant radiographic changes | Number | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Emphysema | 360 | 32.31 |
| Radiopaque foreign body | 128 | 11.49 |
| Bronchiectasis/bronchitis | 140 | 12.56 |
| Atelectasis | 100 | 8.97 |
| Pneumonia | 29 | 2.60 |
| Normal CXR | 357 | 32.04 |
| Total | 1,114 | 100 |
Seeds were the most frequent organic objects. Among mineral materials, metal objects were the most common 49 (4.39 %). Meat, chicken and big fish Bones objects were the most common radiopaque FBs, at 54 found (47.78 %), followed by metal objects in 49 cases (43.36 %) (Fig. 1; Tables 2, 4).
Fig. 1.
The variety of foreign bodies. a Whistle; b Scarf pin; c Pin in lateral view; d Pin in PA view
Table 4.
Comparative studies in the world of radiopaque foreign bodies
| No. of patients | Study duration (years) | Commonest radiopaque FB | Commonest FB | Most common clinical symptoms (% Frequency) | Most common age (% Frequency) | M:F | Reference—country |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,624 | 24 years (1989–2012) | Scarf pins | Peanuts | Cough (70 %) | 1–3 years (66 %) | 1,635:989 | Boufersaoui et al.—Algeria [21] |
| 293 | 10 years (1988–1997) | Pins | Nuts | Chocking (77 %) | 1–3 years (64 %) | – | Joseph et al. 1998—USA [22] |
| 87 | 8 years (1990–1998) | Metals | Nuts | Chocking (81 %) | <3 years (79 %) | 57:30 | Metrangolo et al. 1999—Italy [31] |
| 263 | 15 years (1990–2005) | Needle | Sunflower seed | Cough (87 %) | <3 years (56 %) | 176:87 | Sırmalı et al. 2005—Turkey [32] |
| 43 | 15 years (1980–1995) | Chicken bone | Bone | Cough (67 %) | – | 35:8 | Chen et al.—China [20] |
| 1,027 | 8 years (2000–2008) | Fish bone | Peanuts | Cough (84 %) | <3 years (72 %) | 626:401 | Tang et al.—China [23] |
| 45 | 10 years (2000–2010) | Metals | Nuts | – | 1–3 years | 27:18 | Korlacki et al.—Poland [24] |
| 72 | 10 years (1995–2005) | Fish bone | Seeds | Dyspnea (77 %) | <3 years (81 %) | 46:26 | Sílvia Teresa et al. 2009—Brazil [33] |
| 115 | 4 years (2009–2012) | Metals | Peanuts | Cough (53 %) | 1–3 years (74 | 75:40 | Budensab et al.—India [25] |
| 120 | 7 years (1997-2003) | Needles | Ground nuts | Cough (70 %) | 1–3 years (55 %) | 93:27 | Gandhi et al. 2007—India [46] |
| 548 | 10 years (1987–1997) | Metals | Dried nuts | Cough (83 %) | 2–4 years (23 %) | 305:243 | Oguzkya et al. 1998—Turkey [47] |
| 44 | 5 years (2001–2006) | – | – | Cough (82 %) | <3 years (77 %) | – | Rahbarimanesh et al. 2008—Iran [34] |
| 1015 | 20 years (1998–2008) | Meat and chicken bones | Seeds | Cough (73 %) | 1–3 years (54 %) | 644:371 | Nikakhlagh et al. 2009—Iran [12] |
| 316 | 10 years (1995–2005) | Coins | Ground nuts | Breathlessness (93 %) | 1–3 years (69 %) | 139:67 | Kalyanappagol et al. 2007—India [35] |
| 40 | 4 years (1996–2000) | – | Whistle | Cough (75 %) | 5–16 (60 %) | 28:12 | Rehman et al. 2000—Pakistan [36] |
| 189 | 4 years (1997–2001) | – | Pip | Chocking (43 %) | 1–3 years (72 %) | 105:84 | Erikçi et al. 2003—Turkey [37] |
| 357 | 10 years (1990–2000) | Needle | Needle | Cough (78 %) | 10–25 years (43 %) | 151:206 | Eroğlu et al. 2003—Turkey [38] |
| 78 | 5 years (1997–2002) | – | Seeds | – | <3 years (89 %) | 45:33 | Göktas et al. 2009—Germany [39] |
| 96 | 12 years (1995–2007) | – | Peanuts | Cough (82 %) | 1–3 years (32 %) | 62:34 | Cobanoğlu et al. 2009—Turkey [40] |
| 27 | 13 years (1993–2006) | Tooth | Peanuts and watermelon seeds | Cough (100 %) and history of chocking (78 %) | – | – | Chik et al. 2009—Hong kong [41] |
| 32 | 14 years (1987–2008) | Pins | Inorganic objects | Acute infection (25 %) | – | 21:11 | Blanco et al. 2009—Spain [42] |
| 210 | 8 years (1991–1999) | – | Nuts | Suffocation history (91.5 %) | 1–2 years (53 %) | 134:76 | Skoulakis et al. 2000—Greece [43] |
| 132 | 20 years (1997-2007) | – | Peanuts | Wheeze and cough (53 %) | 1–3 years (41 %) | 80:52 | Yadav et al. 2007—Singapore [44] |
| 244 | 10 years (1994–2003) | Chicken bone | Peanuts | – | <3 years (68 %) | 107:75 | Latifi et al. 2006—Kosovo [45] |
| 1,114 | 25 years (1989–2014) | Meat, chicken and big fish bones | Seeds | Cough (70.82 %) | 1–3 years (53.94 %) | 675:439 | Saki et al. 2014—Iran (Current Research) |
Discussion
FB aspiration is a frequently discussed issue in paediatrics; however, the disease is often not diagnosed because there are no distinctive clinical manifestations. In Gursu et al.’s study regarding sensitivity and specificity of clinical history, symptoms, physical examination findings and radiological findings noted respectively, 90.5, 24.1, 97.8, 7.4 and 96.4, 46.3, 71.7, 74.1 %. Symptoms, physical examination and patient history are highly sensitive and radiological findings have maximum specificity [10]. Previous reports suggest that children in the first and second years of life are mainly exposed to FBs (63.5 %) [2, 12, 13]. Delayed diagnosis causes various complications, depending upon the location of the FB [14]. Following diagnosis, immediate bronchoscopy is necessary because it reduces the risk of complications. In a study by Karen in 2013 of 17,537 children, 160 deaths were caused by airway obstruction due to delays in performing bronchoscopy [15]. In our study, bronchoscopy was repeated twice in 11 cases (0.97 %), and in Tang’s study [16] in China this was 4.4 %. In Bittencourt’s study [17], thoracotomy was necessary in 2.1 % (3 of 140) and 1.6 % (102 of 6,393) of cases and lung resection was performed in 0.9 % of cases. With FB aspiration, bronchiectasis and lung damage can occur as a late complication [18]. In Guidi’s study [19], the proportion of males to females was (1.8:1). The most common type of FB aspiration varies from region to region. The most common type of mineral bodies in children are beads, coins, pins, small parts, small toys and stationary applications, such as pen caps. In a study of Orji and Akpehin, Nigeria 27 % of the FBs were radiopaque [3]. Sersar et al., in Egypt in a study on 3,300 patients, found that 23 % were radiopaque [2]. In a 15-year study by Chung-Hua, in China, chicken bones (12 cases) and fish bones (9 cases) (21 cases overall, 48.8 %) were the most common radiopaque FBs [20], which is consistent with our study. In a study by Nikakhlagh et al., the most common radiopaque objects were either meat and chicken bones (54 cases, 5.3 %) or metal (44 cases, 4.4 %) [12], while in Boufersaoui’s 2013 study of 2,624 patients in Algeria, metal objects (272 cases, 10.36 %) (Hairpins alone counted for 169 cases, along with nails, screws, etc.) Were most common [21]. In a study by Joseph et al. in Arizona, United States, nails and screws (6.41 %) were the most common radiopaque FBs [22], while Lan-Fang et al. in a 2009 study [23] of 1,027 children in Hangzhou, China, report 6.62 % radiopaque objects, comprising Fish bones in 27 cases (2.6 %) and pig bones in 22 cases (2.1 %). In Wojciech et al.’s study in 2011 in Poland, radiopaque bodies constituted 7.14 %, all of which were made of metal [24]. 4.34 % of total FBs aspirated in a 2012 study by Budensab noted a majority of coins among radiopaque objects [25].
In our study, the most common FBs were beans. Gang, in his 2012 research, reported peanuts as the most common FBs to be aspirated [26]. The most common FBs in East Asian countries, such as China, were organic objects, such as nuts (fresh and dried) and peanuts, while in European countries, such as Italy and Kosovo, organic materials including dried nuts where the most common. Mineral objects were most common in some countries, such as Spain [21]. Recently putting the scarf pin on the mouth while wearing the headscarf mentioned as a risk factor for FB aspiration, especially in Muslim countries, such as Turkey, Egypt, Kuwait, Jordan and Morocco [27–29]. A study was performed of 2,624 Algerian children in 2013, and the most common FBs were found to be peanuts, peas and sunflower seeds, the latter of which were the most dangerous [21]. A possible reason behind delays in recognition is that parents can be unaware of the importance of symptoms such as coughing and choking. Because the symptoms exhibited by children following choking are usually not severe, parents do not take speedy action unless the coughing or fever continues. In most cases, FB aspiration has occurred while the parents are there, and so public education is useful in reducing the phenomenon [30].
Conclusions
The diagnosis of FB aspiration in children is difficult because their symptoms can be confused with asthma or respiratory infection, which can result in delays in diagnosis and treatment. Although the mortality rate due to FB aspiration is low, cooperation between the otolaryngologists, paediatrics and radiologists for rapid diagnosis and appropriate treatment is essential. Given that the radiological findings are highly specific as regards the detection of radiopaque FB, radiographic examination prior to bronchoscopy for FB localization and shortening the time of bronchoscopy in patients with a history of radiopaque FB aspiration can be helpful.
Due to the high morbidity and mortality caused by prolong and repeated bronchoscopy, the use of newer techniques and equipment in shortening extraction time of the foreign bodies should be considered in future researches.
Acknowledgments
This paper is issued from thesis of Seyed Mohammad Heshmati and financial support was provided by Hearing and Speech Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran (Grant No. HRC-9304).
Contributor Information
Nader Saki, Phone: +98-611-3775007, Email: ahvaz.ent@gmail.com.
Soheila Nikakhlagh, Phone: +98-611-3775007, Email: nikakhlagh.s@gmail.com.
Seyed Mohammad Heshmati, Phone: +98-611-3743019, Email: mooe_360@yahoo.com.
References
- 1.Black RE, Johnson DG, Matlak ME. Bronchoscopic removal of aspirated foreign bodies in children. Am J Surg. 1994;148:778–781. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(84)90436-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sersar S, Rizk WH, Bilal M, ElDiasty MM, Eltantawy TA, Abdelhakam BB. Inhaled foreign bodies: presentation, management and value of history and plain chest radiography in delayed presentation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;134:92–99. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.08.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Orji FT, Akpeh JO. Tracheobronchial foreign body aspiration in children: how reliable are clinical and radiological signs in the diagnosis? Clin Otolaryngol. 2011;35(6):479–485. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2010.02214.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Marquette CH, Martinot A. Foreign body removal in adultsand children. In: Bolliger CT, editor. Interventional bronchoscopy. Basel: S Karger AG; 2000. pp. 96–107. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chiu CY, Wong KS, Lai SH, Hsia SH, Wu CT. Factors predicting early diagnosis of foreign body aspiration in children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2005;21:161–164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tariq SM, George J, Srinivasan S. Inhaled foreign bodies in adolescents and adults. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2005;63(4):193–198. doi: 10.4081/monaldi.2005.620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Martinot A, Closset M, Marquette CH, Hue V, Deschildre A, Ramon P. Indications for flexible versus rigid bronchoscopy in children with suspected foreign-body aspiration. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;155(5):1676–1679. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.155.5.9154875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Emir H, Tekant G, Beşik C, Eliçevik M, Senyüz OF, Büyükünal C, Sarimurat N, Yeker D. Bronchoscopic removal of tracheobronchial foreign bodies: value of patient history and timing. Pediatr Surg Int. 2001;17(2–3):85–87. doi: 10.1007/s003830000485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ozkan A, Okur M, Kaya M, Kucuk A. A case of bronchogenic cyst mimicking foreign body aspiration. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013;29(7):833–835. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31829884b2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kiyan G, Gocmen B, Tugtepe H, Karakoc F, Dagli E, Dagli TE. Foreign body aspiration in children: the value of diagnostic criteria. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;73(7):963–967. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.03.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ibarz JA, Samitier AS, Alvira RD, Prades PB, Martínez-Pardo NG, Pollina JE. Foreign body aspiration in children. Circ Pediatr. 2007;20(1):25–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Saki N, Nikakhlagh S, Rahim F, Abshirini H. Foreign body aspirations in infancy: a 20-year experience. Int J Med Sci. 2009;6(6):322–328. doi: 10.7150/ijms.6.322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Healy C, Canney M, Murphy A, Regan P. Silver nitrate masquerading as a radiopaque foreign body. Emerg Radiol. 2007;14(1):63–64. doi: 10.1007/s10140-006-0542-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sarafoleanu C, Ballali S, Gregori D, Bellussi L, Passali D. Retrospective study on Romanian foreign body’s injuries in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;76(Suppl1):S73–S75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Swanson KL (2013) Endoscopic foreign body removal. Interventions in pulmonary medicine. Springer, New York, pp 441–450
- 16.Tang FL, Chen MZ, Du ZL, Zou CC, Zhao YZ. Fibrobronchoscopic treatment of foreign body aspiration in children: an experience of 5 years in Hangzhou City, China. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41:e1–e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.10.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bittencourt PF, Camargos PA. Foreign body aspiration. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2002;78:9–18. doi: 10.2223/JPED.659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pinzoni F, Boniotti C, Molinaro SM, Baraldi A, Berlucchi M. Inhaled foreign bodies in pediatric patients: review of personal experience. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2007;71(12):1897–1903. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Midulla F, Guidi R, Barbato A, Capocaccia P, Forenza N, Marseglia G, Pifferi M, Moretti C, Bonci E, De Benedictis FM. Foreign body aspiration in children. Pediatr Int. 2005;47(6):663–668. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-200x.2005.02136.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chen CH, Lai CL, Tsai TT, Lee YC, Perng RP. Foreign body aspiration into the lower airway in Chinese adults. Chest. 1997;112:129–133. doi: 10.1378/chest.112.1.129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Boufersaoui A, Smati L, Benhalla KN, Boukari R, Smail S, Anik K. Foreign body aspiration in children: experience from 2,624 patients. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;77(10):1683–1688. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.07.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zerella JT, Dimler M, McGill LC, Pippus KJ. Foreign body aspiration in children: value of radiography and complications of bronchoscopy. J Pediatr Surg. 1998;33(11):1651–1654. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3468(98)90601-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tang LF, Xu YC, Wang YS, Wang CF, Zhu GH, Bao XE, Lu MP, Chen LX, Chen ZM. Airway foreign body removal by flexible bronchoscopy: experience with 1,027 children during 2000–2008. World J Pediatr. 2009;5(3):191–195. doi: 10.1007/s12519-009-0036-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Korlacki W, Korecka K, Dzielicki J. Foreign body aspiration in children: diagnostic and therapeutic role of bronchoscopy. Pediatr Surg Int. 2011;27:833–837. doi: 10.1007/s00383-011-2874-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Budensab AH, Annigeri VM, Bagalkot PS, Gouda VR (2012) Pattern of foreign body aspiration in children—an experience at SDM college of medical sciences and hospital. Int J Health Sci Res 2(8):20–28
- 26.Gang W, Zhengxia P, Hongbo L, Yonggang L, Jiangtao D, Shengde W. Diagnosis and treatment of tracheobronchial foreign bodies in 1024 children. J Pediatr Surg. 2012;47(11):2004–2010. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.07.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sersar SI. Radiopaque foreign body inhalations. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2012;20(3):320–323. doi: 10.1177/0218492312440431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Al-Sarraf N, Jamal-Eddine H, Khaja F, Ayed AK. Headscarf pin tracheobronchial aspiration: a distinct clinical entity. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009;9:187–190. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.207548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Albirmawy OA, Elsheikh MN. Foreign body aspiration, a continuously growing challenge: Tanta University experience in Egypt. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2011;38:88–94. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2010.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sahin A, Meteroglu F, Eren S, Celik Y. Inhalation of foreign bodies in children: experience of 22 years. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74(2):658–663. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182789520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Metrangolo S, Monetti C, Meneghini L, Zadra N, Giusti F (1999) Eight years' experience with foreign-body aspiration in children: what is really important for a timely diagnosis? J Pediatr Surg 34(8):1229–1231 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 32.Sirmali M, Türüt H, Kisacik E, Findik G, Kaya S, Taştepe I (2005) The relationship between time of admittance and complications in paediatric tracheobronchial foreign body aspiration. Acta Chir Belg 105(6):631–634 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 33. Sousa, Sílvia Teresa Evangelista Vidotto de et al. (2009) Foreign body aspiration in children and adolescents: experience of a Brazilian referral center. J bras pneumol 35(7):653–659 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 34.Rahbarimanesh A, Noroozi E, Molaian M, Salamati P (2008) Foreign body aspiration: a five-year report in a children's hospital. Iranian J Pediatrics 18(2):191–192
- 35.Kalyanappagol VT, Kulkarni NH, Bidri LH (2007) Management of tracheobronchial foreign body aspirations in paediatric age group-A 10 year retrospective analysis. Indian J Anaesth 51(1):20
- 36.Rehman A, Ghani A, Mian FA, Ahmad I, Khalil M, Akhtar N (2000) Foreign body aspiration. THE PROFESSIONAL 7(3):388–392
- 37.Erikçi V, Karaçay S, Arikan A (2003) Foreign body aspiration: a four-years experience. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 9(1):45–49 [PubMed]
- 38. Eroğlu A, Kürkçüoğlu IC, Karaoğlanoğlu N, Yekeler E, Aslan S, Başoğlu A (2003) Tracheobronchial foreign bodies: a 10 year experience. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 9(4):262–266 [PubMed]
- 39.Göktas O, Snidero S, Jahnke V, Passali D, Gregori D (2009) Foreign body aspiration in children: field report of a german hospital. Pediatr Int 52(1):100–103 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 40.Cobanoğlu U, Yalçınkaya I (2009) Tracheobronchial foreign body aspirations. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 15(5):493–499 [PubMed]
- 41.Chik KK, Miu TY, Chan CW (2009) Foreign body aspiration in Hong Kong Chinese children. Hong Kong Med J 15(1):6–11 [PubMed]
- 42.Ramos MB, Fernandez-Villar A, Rivo JE, Leiro V, Garcia-Fontan E, Botana MI, Torres ML, Canizares MA (2009) Extraction of airway foreign bodies in adults: experience from 1987–2008. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 9(3):402–405 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 43.Skoulakis CE, Doxas PG, Papadakis CE, Proimos E, Christodoulou P, Bizakis JG, Velegrakis GA, Mamoulakis D, Helidonis ES (2000) Bronchoscopy for foreign body removal in children. A review and analysis of 210 cases. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 53(2):143–148 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 44.Yadav SPS, Singh J, Aggarwal N, Goel A (2007) Airway foreign bodies in children: experience of 132 cases. Singapore Med J 48(9):850 [PubMed]
- 45. Latifi X, Mustafa A, Hysenaj Q (2006) Rigid tracheobronchoscopy in the management of airway foreign bodies: 10 years experience in Kosovo. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 70(12):2055–2059 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 46.Gandhi R, Jain A, Agarwal R, Vajifdar H (2007). Tracheobronchial Foreign Bodies- A seven years review. J Anesth Clin Pharmacol 23(1):69–74
- 47.Oguzkaya F, Akcali Y, Kahraman C, Bilgin M, Sahin A (1998). Tracheobronchial foreign body aspirations in childhood: a 10-year experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 14(4):388–392 [DOI] [PubMed]

