Abstract
Doped quantum dots (d-dots) can serve as fluorescent biosensors and biolabels for biological applications. Our study describes a synthesis of mercaptopropionic acid (MPA)-capped Mn2+:ZnSe/ZnO d-dots through a facile, cost-efficient hydrothermal route. The as-prepared water-soluble d-dots exhibit strong emission at ca. 580 nm, with a photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) as high as 31%, which is the highest value reported to date for such particles prepared via an aqueous route. They also exhibit upconversion emission when excited at 800 nm. With an overall diameter of around 6.7 nm, the d-dots could gain access to the cell nucleus without any surface decoration, demonstrating their promising broad applications as fluorescent labels.
Quantum dots (QDs) or semiconductor nanocrystals are of great interest to fundamental studies and potential applications as fluorescent probes, fluorescent biosensors, light-emitting diodes (LEDs), and solar cells.1-6 Recently, introducing transition metal ions into the intrinsic QDs has been widely explored because of the unique optical properties of the d-dots.7-11 The d-dots not only retain nearly all the advantages of intrinsic QDs but also possess new properties such as the enhancement of the thermal stability, the reduction of the chemical sensitivity, and the elimination of the self-quenching and re-absorption due to enlarged Stokes shift caused by absorption/energy transfer. Mn2+:ZnSe QD is one of the most popular d-dots because of its cadmium free, remarkable magneto-optical properties and the long fluorescence lifetime of the Mn2+ emission suitable for broad applications.11-19
Although numerous organometallic routes were reported to successfully synthesize oil-soluble Mn2+:ZnSe QDs with high PLQYs in the last decade,11-15 direct synthesis of highly fluorescent Mn2+:ZnSe QDs in aqueous medium is still a challenge. A typical approach to prepare aqueous d-dots requires at least two steps (nucleation and growth) and hours of refluxing to achieve the optimal optical properties,17-20 and the PLQYs of the most as-prepared aqueous d-dots are less than 5%, which greatly limits their applications. Although ZnS or ZnO shells can be coated around MPA or 1-thioglycerol (TG) stabilized d-dots to improve their PLQYs, the coating procedure is also time-consuming, and the PLQYs of the resulting core/shell d-dots are still less than 15%. Therefore, it is of significance and is a great challenge to develop an effective route to prepare highly fluorescent Mn2+:ZnSe QDs in aqueous solution.
In this Communication, we successfully synthesized MPA stabilized Mn2+:ZnSe/ZnO d-dots through the hydrothermal route for the first time (see Scheme 1), which is considered as a simple and highly efficient method. One-step process was used to prepare Mn2+:ZnSe d-dots by simply mixing the dopant and the host precursor together and heating the mixture in a Teflon-lined stainless autoclave for less than 1 hour; the resulting d-dots exhibited PLQY of 12.5%. Then a ZnO shell was successfully coated onto the as-prepared d-dots hydrothermally, resulting in an improved PLQY up to 19.8%. Moreover, we found that photoactivation post-treatment was an effective way to further improve their PLQY irreversibly, which can reach up to 31% after 8 W 365 nm UV lamp irradiation for about 4 hours, the highest reported value of water-soluble Mn2+: ZnSe/ZnO d-dots via the aqueous route so far.
Fig. 1a demonstrates the UV-vis absorption and PL spectra of Mn2+:ZnSe d-dots at different reaction times during the onestep hydrothermal synthesis. An obvious red shift of absorption and the PL peak toward longer wavelength could be observed with prolonged reaction time, together with a gradual decrease of the intensity of the bandgap PL corresponding to the ZnSe QDs centered at about 400 nm, trap state emission from surface defects at about 460 nm, and a gradual increase of the intensity of the pseudo-tetrahedral (4T1 to 6A1) transition of Mn2+ ions incorporated into the ZnSe QDs at about 570 nm. As Peng et al.11 have claimed, Mn2+ is a harder Lewis acid than Zn2+, which should be significantly less reactive than Zn2+ if they both have the same carboxylate ligand. Thus, in our one-step strategy, it is quite possible that the ZnSe crystals were firstly formed followed by the absorbance of the dopants onto the surface. As the reaction continued, more Mn2+ ions were incorporated into the ZnSe crystal by replacing the Zn element. As the internal doping continued, the intensity of trap emission and band gap emission gradually decreased and the 4T1 to 6A1 emission of Mn2+ became dominant. Finally, only the 4T1 to 6A1 emission of Mn2+ remained in the Mn2+:ZnSe d-dots. In our experiments, “growth-doping” was realized by a one-pot procedure, which was much more convenient, time-saving and suitable for large scale fabrication, and cubic zinc blended Mn2+:ZnSe d-dots with PLQY up to 12.5% and the average diameter of about 3 nm (Fig. 1b) can be prepared at 200 °C in 30 min.
Although the as-prepared Mn2+:ZnSe d-dots possess PLQY comparable to the core/shell d-dots prepared through other aqueous routes,17-22 the PLQY of 12.5% is still not ideal for further applications. Therefore, Mn2+:ZnSe/ZnO core/shell QDs were synthesized to further improve both the chemical stability and PLQY of Mn2+:ZnSe QDs. ZnO was chosen as the shell material due to its wide band gap (3.37 eV at room temperature), which is also believed to be non-toxic and bio-safe.23 Unlike the synthesis of core/shell QDs from organic solution, it is much more difficult to prepare water-soluble core/shell QDs from aqueous solution due to the complex solution environment. It is reported that the epitaxial growth of the ZnO shell is achieved by adding Zn2+ salt to the d-dots solution under alkaline conditions, and the added Zn2+ would be hydrolyzed into Zn(OH)2 which would then dehydrate into ZnO and deposit onto the surface of QDs and form a ZnO shell. However, it was claimed that hydrothermal conditions are not suitable for ZnO shell coating, and the QDs would aggregate and thus capping could not be achieved.24 In our experiments, a hydrothermal route was applied instead of the refluxing to successfully obtain the core/shell structure rapidly, and an excess amount of MPA (ZnSe : MPA = 1 : 3.6) was used in the synthesis to avoid aggregation. The ZnO shell was successfully installed onto the Mn2+:ZnSe d-dots (see Fig. 2b, Fig. S1 and Table S1†) to obtain the MPA-capped Mn2+:ZnSe/ZnO d-dots with an average diameter of ~6.7 nm (see Fig. 1c), and their PLQY was improved up to 19.8% in 15 min (see Fig. 2a). No change in the PL peak position was observed before and after ZnO shell coating (see Fig. 1a), which was also observed in other reports when overcoating uncapped ZnS:Mn or ZnSe:Mn nanocrystals with a ZnO shell.21,25
As the hyperfine splitting is strongly dependent on the local environment, the EPR test was carried out to determine the locality and distribution of Mn2+ ions in the d-dots. A typical EPR spectrum of the Mn2+:ZnSe/ZnO d-dots is shown in Fig. S2.† Differently from the classic six-line hyperfine splitting pattern of Mn2+, the EPR signal of the Mn2+:ZnSe/ZnO d-dots appears as a broad line feature, which is similar to that of aqueous synthesized Mn2+:ZnSe QDs.19 The broad line feature indicated that a high concentration of Mn2+ was doped into the ZnSe QDs and the strong dipolar interactions between Mn2+–Mn2+ influenced the hyperfine splitting of the EPR signal.26,27
The photostability of the as-prepared d-dots was evaluated (as shown in Fig. S3†), and an interesting phenomenon was observed that the PLQY of the d-dots would increase gradually under 8 W 365 nm UV lamp irradiation and could reach up to 31% after about 4 h irradiation (see Fig. 2a), which is much higher than those reported in other literature reports.17-22 It has been reported that the PLQY enhancement of MPA-capped Mn2+:ZnSe in some situations could result from the forming of the ZnS shell.28 We, however, found that the wurtzite structure of ZnO could either emerge or could be better crystallized for Mn2+:ZnSe or Mn2+:ZnSe/ZnO respectively under UV irradiation for a certain time (see Fig. 2b). We did not observe obvious particle size variation of Mn2+:ZnSe or Mn2+:ZnSe/ZnO d-dots after UV irradiation. It was reported that some molecules would be adsorbed on the surface of the quantum dots under UV irradiation.29-31 Some of the adsorbed molecules could be removed by simply turning the illumination source off. The other adsorbed molecules, however, would form an oxide layer irreversibly. A ZnO shell, therefore, could form under UV irradiation for a period of time (see Fig. 2b), which resulted in a great improvement of the PLQY of Mn2+:ZnSe d-dots comparable to that of Mn2+:ZnSe/ZnO d-dots. However, the hydrothermally synthesized Mn2+:ZnSe/ZnO d-dots under UV irradiation could achieve the highest PLQY in a much shorter time than that of the direct irradiated Mn2+:ZnSe d-dots (see Fig. S3†). Moreover, the thermal stabilities of Mn2+: ZnSe and Mn2+:ZnSe/ZnO d-dots were also improved after 365 nm UV irradiation, and the irradiated Mn2+:ZnSe/ZnO d-dots showed excellent thermal stability (see Fig. S4†), which is good for their further applications. pH stability of Mn2+:ZnSe and Mn2+:ZnSe/ZnO d-dots was also measured to insure their bio-application. The pH value was adjusted to 5.5 and 7.4, corresponding to the pH of lysosomal and serum respectively. As is shown in Fig. S5,† the PL intensity would decrease to some degree under low pH environment, which could still maintain over 70% of their initial value for the Mn2+:ZnSe/ZnO core/shell d-dots. The low-pH stability of the Mn2+:ZnSe/ZnO d-dots is better than that of Mn2+:ZnSe d-dots, indicating that the ZnO could improve the chemical stability of d-dots.
The crystal structure of the prepared d-dots could be confirmed by the powder XRD patterns. As shown in Fig. 2b, all the nanocrystals of Mn2+:ZnSe and Mn2+:ZnSe/ZnO before and after 8 W 365 nm UV lamp irradiation exhibit characteristic peaks at about 27.5°, 45.6°, and 54.3° corresponding to the (111), (220), and (311) reflecting planes of cubic zinc blended ZnSe. No obvious shift could be seen between the Mn2+:ZnSe and Mn2+:ZnSe/ZnO,21 indicating that the capping shell was not a ZnS and the ZnO shell does not change the lattice spacing of ZnSe nanocrystals. Different from the other reports,21,24 the emergence of the ZnO wurtzite phase could be observed while there was no obvious further shift of the characteristic peaks to higher angle, indicating that the enhancement of PLQY is not related to the formation of ZnS layers as described in the literature.28 Though the ZnO shell could be installed either by the UV irradiation or thermally, the ZnO wurtzite phase of thermally synthesized Mn2+:ZnSe/ ZnO d-dots was much clearer than that of the direct UV irradiated ones, implying that the direct UV treatment could only result in the formation of a very thin ZnO shell, while the ZnO shell could be thicker (see Fig. 1c) and better crystallized in the hydrothermal route, and a 365 nm UV treatment on the hydrothermally synthesized Mn2+:ZnSe/ZnO could make the ZnO shell further crystallized (see Fig. 2b). Moreover, the formation of ZnO layers around Mn:ZnSe d-dots could also be confirmed by measuring the PL decay of the d-dots (see Fig. 2c and Table S2†), and the Mn2+ ion emission lifetime of Mn2+:ZnSe d-dots is much shorter than that of UV irradiated Mn2+:ZnSe, Mn2+:ZnSe/ZnO and UV irradiated Mn2+:ZnSe/ ZnO d-dots. It is reported that the Mn2+ ion emission lifetime is dependent on the diameter of the nanocrystals and is longer for d-dots with a thicker overcoating layer or thicker diffusion region.17,32 The longer decay times of the core/shell d-dots, attributed to the emission of the single isolated Mn2+ ions in a cubic site,33-35 provide another evidence of the deeper embedding of Mn2+ dopant centers in these d-dots. It is worth noting that the emission lifetime of MPA-Mn2+: ZnSe/ZnO d-dots after UV irradiation can reach up to 902 μs, which could be utilized for time-resolved fluorescence detection.36,37
It is also interesting that the as-prepared MPA-Mn2+:ZnSe/ ZnO d-dots show upconversion fluorescence properties and can be excited by an 800 nm laser (see Fig. 2d and Fig. S6†). The emission spectra and the corresponding emission photographs excited by 400 nm and 800 nm lasers are displayed in Fig. 2d. The emission peaks which were excited by the 800 nm laser matched well with their respective counterparts under 400 nm UV excitation. Strong up-conversion luminescence of Mn2+ in Mn2+:ZnS nanoparticles is attributed to a two-photon absorption process,38 in which one nanocrystal simultaneously absorbs two photons, whose sum energy is equal to the energy difference between the conductive band and the valence band. Due to the similar crystal structure and the same doping ions, the up-conversion luminescence of Mn2+ in the as-prepared Mn2+:ZnSe d-dots might also be attributed to the two-photon absorption process, suggesting their applications in bio-imaging excited by multiphotons of the near-infrared region. Recently, multiphoton bioimaging has attracted much attention due to little near-infrared absorption from endogenous species and water.39,40
The synthesized MPA-Mn2+:ZnSe/ZnO d-dots are expected to show low cytotoxicity. Fig. S7† displays the cell viability of SKOV3, HeLa and L02 cells in the presence of MPA-Mn2+:ZnSe/ ZnO d-dots suspension, and the d-dots exhibited low cyto-toxicity (greater than 80% cell viability, <200 μg mL−1) and were slightly affected at higher concentrations (400 μg mL−1). The confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) images (Fig. 3a, c and e) show SKOV3, HeLa and L02 cells labeled with MPA-Mn2+:ZnSe/ZnO d-dots under 400 nm excitation. The yellow emission was clearly observed from all three kinds of cells. The multi-photon cell labeling of MPA-Mn2+:ZnSe/ZnO d-dots was also demonstrated using SKOV3, HeLa and L02 cells. As shown in Fig. 3b, d and f, strong yellow emission from the cells was detected under the excitation of the 800 nm laser. These results suggested that the obtained MPA-Mn2+:ZnSe/ ZnO d-dots showed promising cell labeling applications under either UV or near infrared excitations.
Notably, both the confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and two photon confocal microscopy (TPCM) images showed that MPA-Mn2+:ZnSe/ZnO d-dots had a strong affinity for cell nuclei (Fig. 3a–f). The fluorescent d-dots were highly concentrated in the nuclei of SKOV3, HeLa and L02 cells. To further investigate the location of the d-dots, Z-stack sections of 2D CLSM images of SKOV3, HeLa and L02 cells stained by MPA-Mn2+:ZnSe/ZnO d-dots were reconstructed into 3D images for observation (see Fig. 3e–g, Fig. S8 and Movie S1†). The 3D CLSM images clearly showed that MPA-Mn2+:ZnSe/ZnO d-dots were preferentially concentrated in the cell nuclei. Bio-TEM pictures of MPA-Mn2+:ZnSe/ZnO stained HeLa cells were also taken (see Fig. S9†). It could be obviously seen in Fig. S9a† that the MPA-Mn2+:ZnSe/ZnO d-dots were located mainly in the cell nucleus. However, the d-dots were separated randomly in the nucleus, and there was no specific location for them (see Fig. S9b†). Because of the importance of visualizing cell nuclei, many selective nuclei staining techniques, including NoLS polypeptides and antibodies to specific proteins,41,42 and those that target the genetic materials (DNA or RNA) were reported.43,44 However, it is a complicated case for nucleus-targeting QDs, and both suitable size for cell permeability and specific interaction with nucleus materials are important for QDs to achieve the nucleus-targeting function. At physiological pH, the negatively charged MPA-Mn2+:ZnSe/ ZnO d-dots might bind to positively charged basic proteins, such as histone, which are abundant in cell nuclei, and may be the driving force of the nucleus-targeting functions of MPA-Mn2+:ZnSe/ZnO d-dots. However, the size of MPA-Mn2+: ZnSe/ZnO d-dots is about 6.7 nm, which is much bigger than that of the reported nucleus-targeting QDs (glutathione (GSH)-capped CdTe (4.0 nm),45 thioglycolic acid (TGA)-capped CdTe (3.6 and 2.6 nm)46 and 1,2,3-triazole-PEG (TA)-capped CdS (<4.0 nm)47). A detailed study of the nucleus-targeting functions of MPA-Mn2+:ZnSe/ZnO d-dots will be carried out in the future.
In summary, our study describes a synthesis of mercapto-propionic acid (MPA)-capped Mn2+:ZnSe/ZnO d-dots through a facile hydrothermal route that is cost-effective. The as-prepared water-soluble d-dots exhibit strong emission at a wavelength of about 580 nm with the quantum yield as high as 31%, which is the highest reported value via the aqueous route so far. They also exhibit upconversion emission at the excitation of 800 nm. With an overall size as big as ~6.7 nm, they could surprisingly gain access to the cell nucleolus, demonstrating their promising broad applications as fluorescent labels.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was financially supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 program, 2010CB933901, 2013CB733802), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (project no. 50902093, 81272987, 81371645), a grant to Prof. Wanwan Li from the Ph.D. Programs Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China (project no. 200802481131), Medicine & Engineering Cross Research Foundation of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (project no. YG2012MS61), and Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (project no. LY12H11011). We thank the Instrumental Analysis Center of SJTU for the assistance with TEM, XRD and XPS characterization.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Experimental details, characterization and cell culture tests results. See DOI: 10.1039/c4nr03490b
Contributor Information
Kang Sun, Email: ksun@sjtu.edu.cn.
Wanwan Li, Email: wwli@sjtu.edu.cn.
Notes and references
- 1.Gao X, Cui Y, Levenson RM, Chung LW, Nie S. Nat Biotechnol. 2004;22:969–976. doi: 10.1038/nbt994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Han M, Gao X, Su JZ, Nie S. Nat Biotechnol. 2001;19:631. doi: 10.1038/90228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lim J, Jun S, Jang E, Baik H, Kim H, Cho J. Adv Mater. 2007;19:1927–1932. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Li YQ, Rizzo A, Cingolani R, Gigli G. Adv Mater. 2006;18:2545–2548. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nozik AJ. Physica E. 2002;14:115–120. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Smith AM, Duan H, Mohs AM, Nie S. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 2008;60:1226–1240. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2008.03.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Erwin SC, Zu L, Haftel MI, Efros AL, Kennedy TA, Norris DJ. Nature. 2005;436:91–94. doi: 10.1038/nature03832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stouwdam JW, Janssen RAJ. Adv Mater. 2009;21:2916–2920. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wang X, Yan X, Li W, Sun K. Adv Mater. 2012;24:2742–2747. doi: 10.1002/adma.201104861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wu P, Yan XP. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42:5489–5521. doi: 10.1039/c3cs60017c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pradhan N, Goorskey D, Thessing J, Peng X. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:17586–17587. doi: 10.1021/ja055557z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zeng R, Rutherford M, Xie R, Zou B, Peng X. Chem Mater. 2010;22:2107–2113. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zeng R, Zhang T, Dai G, Zou B. J Phys Chem C. 2011;115:3005–3010. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Shen H, Wang H, Li X, Niu JZ, Chen X, Li LS. Dalton Trans. 2009:10534–10540. doi: 10.1039/b917674h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pradhan N, Sarma DD. J Phys Chem Lett. 2011;2:2818–2826. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pradhan N, Battaglia DM, Liu Y, Peng X. Nano Lett. 2006;7:312–317. doi: 10.1021/nl062336y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Aboulaich A, Geszke M, Balan L, Ghanbaja J, Medjahdi G, Schneider R. Inorg Chem. 2010;49:10940–10948. doi: 10.1021/ic101302q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Liu Ja, Wei X, Qu Y, Cao J, Chen C, Jiang H. Mater Lett. 2011;65:2139–2141. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wang C, Gao X, Ma Q, Su X, Mater J. Chem. 2009;19:7016–7022. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Shao P, Zhang Q, Li Y, Wang H. J Mater Chem. 2011;21:151. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Aboulaich A, Balan L, Ghanbaja J, Medjahdi G, Merlin C, Schneider Rl. Chem Mater. 2011;23:3706–3713. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gao X, Zhang H, Li Y, Su X. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2012;402:1871–1877. doi: 10.1007/s00216-011-5640-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Talapin DV, Lee JS, Kovalenko MV, Shevchenko EV. Chem Rev. 2009;110:389–458. doi: 10.1021/cr900137k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Aldeek F, Balan L, Medjahdi G, Roques-Carmes T, Malval J-P, Mustin C, Ghanbaja J, Schneider Rl. J Phys Chem C. 2009;113:19458–19467. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Jiang D, Cao L, Liu W, Su G, Qu H, Sun Y, Dong B. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2009;4:78–83. doi: 10.1007/s11671-008-9205-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Norman TJ, Magana D, Wilson T, Burns C, Zhang JZ, Cao D, Bridges F. J Phys Chem B. 2003;107:6309–6317. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gonzalez Beermann PA, McGarvey BR, Muralidharan S, Sung RC. Chem Mater. 2004;16:915–918. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lan GY, Lin YW, Huang YF, Chang HT. J Mater Chem. 2007;17:2661. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cordero SR, Carson PJ, Estabrook RA, Strouse GF, Buratto SK. J Phys Chem B. 2000;104:12137–12142. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Dembski S, Graf C, Kruger T, Gbureck U, Ewald A, Bock A, Ruhl E. Small. 2008;4:1516–1526. doi: 10.1002/smll.200700997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Carrillo-Carrion C, Cardenas S, Simonet BM, Valcarcel M. Chem Commun. 2009:5214–5226. doi: 10.1039/b904381k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gan C, Zhang Y, Battaglia D, Peng X, Xiao M. Appl Phys Lett. 2008;92:241111. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bol AA, Meijerink A. Phys Rev B: Condens Matter. 1998;58:R15997–R16000. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Smith BA, Zhang JZ, Joly A, Liu J. Phys Rev B: Condens Matter. 2000;62:2021–2028. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zheng J, Yuan X, Ikezawa M, Jing P, Liu X, Zheng Z, Kong X, Zhao J, Masumoto Y. J Phys Chem C. 2009;113:16969–16974. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhu D, Chen Y, Jiang L, Geng J, Zhang J, Zhu JJ. Anal Chem. 2011;83:9076–9081. doi: 10.1021/ac202101u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wang HF, He Y, Ji TR, Yan XP. Anal Chem. 2009;81:1615–1621. doi: 10.1021/ac802375a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chen W, Joly A, Zhang J. Phys Rev B: Condens Matter. 2001;64:041202. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Cao L, Wang X, Meziani MJ, Lu F, Wang H, Luo PG, Lin Y, Harruff BA, Veca LM, Murray D, Xie S-Y, Sun Y-P. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:11318–11319. doi: 10.1021/ja073527l. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Maestro LM, Rodríguez EMn, Rodríguez FS, la Cruz MCI-d, Juarranz A, Naccache R, Vetrone F, Jaque D, Capobianco JA, Solé JGa. Nano Lett. 2010;10:5109–5115. doi: 10.1021/nl1036098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Dean KA, von Ahsen O, Görlich D, Fried HM. J Cell Sci. 2001;114:3479–3485. doi: 10.1242/jcs.114.19.3479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Korgaonkar C, Hagen J, Tompkins V, Frazier AA, Allamargot C, Quelle FW, Quelle DE. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:1258–1271. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.4.1258-1271.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Liu X, Chen H, Patel D. J Biomol NMR. 1991;1:323–347. doi: 10.1007/BF02192858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Li Q, Kim Y, Namm J, Kulkarni A, Rosania GR, Ahn Y-H, Chang Y-T. Chem Biol. 2006;13:615–623. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2006.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zheng Y, Gao S, Ying JY. Adv Mater. 2007;19:376–380. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Williams Y, Sukhanova A, Nowostawska M, Davies AM, Mitchell S, Oleinikov V, Gun’ko Y, Nabiev I, Kelleher D, Volkov Y. Small. 2009;5:2581–2588. doi: 10.1002/smll.200900744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Shen R, Shen X, Zhang Z, Li Y, Liu S, Liu H. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:8627–8634. doi: 10.1021/ja1002668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.